Economics Group Special Commentary Mark Vitner, Senior Economist mark.vitner@wellsfargo.com (74) 4-3277 Anika R. Khan, Senior Economist anika.khan@wellsfargo.com (74) 4-3271 Misa Batcheller, Economic Analyst misa.n.batcheller@wellsfargo.com (74) 4-36 Housing Continues to Show Improvement Continued turmoil in the global financial markets and slower growth overseas continues to fuel doubts about the U.S. economic outlook. Overall growth has held up relatively well, however, with real GDP expanding at an upwardly revised 3.9 percent annual rate during the second quarter and nonfarm employment continuing to post solid gains. Conditions have improved so much that several Federal Reserve Bank presidents and Federal Reserve Board governors have pointedly noted that they feel the Federal Reserve should boost short-term interest rates before the end of this year. Such a move would hardly come as a surprise, as most forecasts, including ours, have incorporated at least one quarter-point increase in the federal funds rate for 215. That said, a rate hike is still far from a sure thing and will depend upon economic conditions leading up to the next two Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings. Assessing the strength of the U.S. economy is not an easy task. GDP growth has been unusually volatile in recent years, with weakness during the early and latter parts of the year and robust gains during the spring and summer. The pattern has defied the statistical agencies best efforts to correct for ordinary seasonal variations. Swings in economic growth have been amplified by unusually harsh winter weather, port disruptions, government shutdowns and possibly some echo from the Great Recession, which has led to more pronounced seasonal swings in measured economic activity. As we sift through the data, one trend seems abundantly clear the further you get away from the global economic slowdown the better the economy seems to be. The four areas most directly affected by the global economic slowdown energy, mining, agriculture and manufacturing collectively account for 16 percent of real GDP and accounted for 2 percent of real GDP growth during the first five years of the recovery. These four sectors are exceptionally capital-intensive, however, and account for a smaller share of employment. Continued turmoil in the global financial markets and slower growth overseas continues to fuel doubts about the U.S. economic outlook. Figure 1 Figure 2 2.4 2.1 1.5 Multifamily Starts Multifamily Forecast Single-family Starts Single-family Forecast Housing Starts Millions of Units Forecast 2.4 2.1 1.5 1,6 1, 1,3 1,2 1, 9 7 New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Thousands of Units, SAAR, Index New Home Sales: Aug @ 552. (Left Axis) NAHB Wells Fargo Index: Sep @ 62. (Right Axis) 1 9 8 7 6.9.9 4 4 3 2.3.3 1.. 8 82 84 86 88 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, NAHB and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC This report is available on wellsfargo.com/economics and on Bloomberg WFRE.
The demand for housing is largely derived from the underlying growth in local economies around the country. While uncertainty about the global economy and interest rates has increased, we remain optimistic about housing. Domestic Economic Conditions Are More Important for Housing Demand The further you get away from global economic conditions the better the economy looks and it is hard to find an industry that is more insulated from the ups and downs of the global economy than housing. The demand for housing is largely derived from the underlying growth in local economies around the country. The past couple of years have shown steady improvement throughout most of the country, with unemployment rates falling in 365 of the nation s 387 metropolitan areas over the year. Of the 51 metropolitan areas with a 2 Census population of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in August, at 3.2 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively. San Jose, CA, Charlotte, NC and Portland, OR posted the largest year-over-year job growth, with employment rising 5.5 percent, 4. percent and 4. percent, respectively. The largest year-to-year job gains were in New York City, Dallas and Los Angeles, which posted gains of 127, jobs, 84,9 jobs and 76, jobs, respectively. The increased strength and improving breadth of job growth has led to a fairly dramatic increase in household formations across the country. So far, nearly all of the growth in households has shown up in the rental market but that appears to be changing. Homebuilders continue to report strengthening demand, particularly from first-time home buyers and retirees. Demand for apartments remains exceptionally strong, however, particularly in markets that have experienced strong job growth in recent years. The improvement in employment conditions has led to an increase in state-to-state migration. Many new arrivals tend to rent for some period of time before buying, adding further fuel to the apartment boom. The overall apartment vacancy rate was just 4.2 percent during the second quarter of 215, roughly unchanged from a year earlier. We continue to closely monitor housing markets in Texas and the rest of the energy patch as well as other major metropolitan areas with outsized exposure to the slowing global economy. Some areas have already felt a significant effect on employment, but most are fairly small metropolitan areas. The largest year-over-year job losses have been in Moline-Davenport-Rock Island, IA-IL, Lafayette, LA and Peoria, IL. All of have been adversely affected by weakening commodity prices and the related impact on manufacturers located in their area. The slowdown here, however, has little impact on housing, as these regions have seen little population growth in recent years. While uncertainty about the global economy and interest rates has increased, we remain optimistic about housing. The fundamentals continue to improve and interest rates remain near historic lows. Tight supplies present somewhat of a hurdle, however, and have allowed prices to rebound much faster than incomes have risen. However, higher prices have also made suburban residential development more attractive. We expect homebuilding to strengthen next year, even if the global economic slowdown winds up taking an even larger bite out of U.S. growth in 216. Figure 3 Figure 4 Portland Baltimore Riverside San Diego Houston Charlotte Detroit Orlando Phoenix San Jose Chicago Seattle Miami Washington D.C. Boston Atlanta San Francisco Dallas New York Los Angeles MSA Employment Growth Number of Jobs Added Year-over-Year, in Thousands Jobs Added 2 4 6 8 12 14 % -1, 66 7 74 78 82 86 9 94 98 2 6 14 Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor and U.S. Dept. of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 7 7% 6 6% 5 U.S. Homeowners vs. Renters Percent; Annual Change in Occupied Units, In Thousands Renters: 214 @ 26.3 Thousand (Right Axis) Homeowners: 214 @ -234.5 Thousand (Right Axis) Homeownership Rate: 214 @ 64. (Left Axis) Series Break 1981 3, 2,2 1, 7-7 2
National Housing Outlook Forecast 28 29 2 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 Real GDP, percent change -.3-2.8 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.4 Nonfarm Employment, percent change - -4.3 -.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.5 Unemployment Rate 5.8 9.3 9.6 8.9 8.1 7.4 6.2 5.3 4.8 4.5 Home Construction Total Housing Starts, in thousands 95.5 553.9 586.9 68.8 78 924.9 3.3 1,12. 1,2. 1,3. Single-Family Starts, in thousands 622. 445. 471.1 43.5 535.3 617.7 647.8 72. 82. 9. Multifamily Starts, in thousands 283.5 8.9 115.8 178.3 245.3 37.2 355.5 4. 43. 44. Home Sales New Home Sales, Single-Family, in thousands 485. 374. 321. 35. 369. 429. 437. 54. 63. 7. Total Existing Home Sales, in thousands 4,1. 4,34. 4,19. 4,26. 4,66. 5,9. 4,94. 5,37. 5,. 5,. Existing Single-Family Home Sales, in thousands 3,66. 3,87. 3,78. 3,787. 4,128. 4,484. 4,344. 4,7. 4,8. 4,8. Existing Condominium & Townhouse Sales, in thousands 4. 464. 474. 477. 528. 63. 591. 62. 6. 6. Home Prices Median New Home, $ Thousands 232.1 216.7 22 227.2 245.2 268.9 282.8 296. 38. 318. Percent Change -6.4-6.6 2.4 2.4 7.9 9.7 5.2 4.7 4.1 3.3 Median Existing Home, $ Thousands 198.1 172.5 172.9 166.1 176.8 197.1 28.3 218.6 227.7 236.8 Percent Change -9.5-12.9.2-3.9 6.4 11.5 5.7 4.9 4.2 4. FHFA (OFHEO) Home Price Index (Purch Only), Pct Chg -7.9-5.7-3. -4.1 3.2 7.5 5.5 4.8 4.2 3.9 Case-Shiller C- Home Price Index, Percent Change -16.7-12.9 2.1-3.5.3 11.7 7.9 4.5 3.9 3.7 Interest Rates - Annual Averages Prime Rate 4.88 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.31 4.13 5.13 Ten-Year Treasury Note 3.66 3.26 3.22 2.78 2.35 2.54 2.22 2.61 2.92 Conventional 3-Year Fixed Rate, Commitment Rate 6.4 5.4 4.69 4.46 3.66 3.98 4.17 3.98 4.38 4.82 One-Year ARM, Effective Rate, Commitment Rate 5.18 4.71 3.79 3.3 2.69 2.61 2.44 2. 3. 3.65 Forecast as of: Source: Federal Reserve Board, FHFA, MBA, NAR, S&P, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 3
Mortgages 1, New Home Sales vs. 3-Year Mortgage Rate Thousands, SAAR, FHLMC Conventional Fixed Rate Mortgage 3% Mortgage applications trended lower in August, but picked back up in September. Purchase applications are up more than 25 percent from a year ago and refinancing activity grew 18 percent in the week ending Sept. 18. The recent volatility in mortgage applications was largely due to the uncertainty that surrounded the September FOMC meeting (Sept. 16-17). There appears to have been a rush to lock in mortgage rates ahead of the FOMC meeting and, after soaring in the week prior to the meeting, applications fell the following week. Mortgage rates are essentially the same as they were prior to the meeting. Mortgage Applications for Purchase Seasonally Adjusted Index, 199= 1,4 1,2 1, 275 2 8 4 2 New Home Sales: Aug @ 552. (Left Axis) 3-Year Fixed Mortg. Rate: Sep @ 3.9% (Inverted Right Axis) 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 Conventional Mortgage to -Year Treasury Spread Basis Points Mortgage Spread: Sep @ 17 bps 6% 7% 9% % 11% 275 2 4 4 225 225 2 2 175 175 2 2 1 1 125 125 Weekly Figure: Sep-18 @ 214.2 Up From: Sep-18 @ 196.3 8-Week Average Up 2% From Same Period Last Year Mort. Appl.: 8-Week Average: Sep-18 @ 22.3 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 25 26 27 28 29 2 211 212 213 214 215 9 MBA Mortgage Credit Availability Index Index, Mar 212 = 9 12,, Mortgage Applications for Refinancing 4-Week Moving Average, Seasonally Adjusted, Index 199 = Weekly Figure: Sep-18 @ 1,833 Up from 1,558 on Sep-11 4-Week Average: Sep-18 @ 1,752 4-Week Average Up 28.% from Same Period Last Year 12,, 8 7 MCAI: Aug @ 126.1 8 7 8, 8, 4 4 6, 6, 2 2 4, 4, 2, 2, 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 Source: Mortgage Bankers Association, FHLMC, U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 4
Single-Family Construction 2. Single-family housing starts slipped for the second straight month in August, declining to a 739,-unit annual rate. Despite the dip, single-family starts remain 14.9 percent above their year ago level. There have also been encouraging signs for the outlook of residential construction. Permits for single-family homes rose to a 699,-unit annual rate in August and are up 8.7 percent over the year. Inventories of completed new homes also remain near historic lows, at just 48, homes nationwide in August. The low level of completed new home inventory means that just about any incremental boost to sales will provide a lift to starts. Single-Family Building Permits SAAR, In Millions, 3-Month Moving Average 2. 1..8.4.2 Existing & New Single-Family Home Sales Both Series In Millions of Units, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate New Home Sales: Aug @ Million (Left Axis) Existing Home Sales: Aug @ 4.7 Million (Right Axis). 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 2. Single-Family Housing Starts SAAR, In Millions, 3-Month Moving Average 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. 2. 1. 1..8.8 1. 1..8.4 Single-Family Building Permits: Aug @ 69K.2 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14.8.4.2.4 Single-Family Housing Starts: Aug @ 729K.2 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 % Expected Single-Family Home Sales Percent, NAHB Housing Market Index.4.2 % 2. Single-Family Housing Completions Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate, In Millions 2. 9% 9% 7% 7% 6% 6% % 3% % 3% 1. 1. 2% 2%.8.4 Single-Family Housing Completions: Aug @ 646K.2 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15.8.4.2 % In the Next 6 Months: Sep @ 68.% % 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Source: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Association of Realtors, NAHB and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC % % 5
Multifamily Construction 5 Multifamily Housing Starts SAAR, In Thousands, 3-Month Moving Average 5 1 12% % Multifamily starts fell 3. percent in August following a 23.9 percent plunge the prior month. We suspect that some of this weakness could be payback for the almost 4 percent surge in June, fueled by the impending expiration of a tax break for new apartment construction in New York City. We had noted then that we would likely see a payback in coming months. The fundamentals for the apartment market and multifamily construction in general remain positive. Stronger job growth has helped drive household formation higher and has also encouraged more state-to-state migration, which is fueling demand for apartments. Millennials are also reaching a time in their life where owning a home becomes more likely, which is creating demand for townhomes. Private Multifamily Construction Spending Percent 3-Month Annual Rate: Jul @ 18. Year-over-Year Percent Change: Jul @ 2% 1 12% % 4 4 3 2 2 1 Multifamily Starts: Aug @ 387K Multifamily Housing Starts: Aug @ 437K 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 4 Multifamily Building Permits SAAR, In Thousands, 3-Month Moving Average 4 4 3 2 2 1 4 6% 6% 2 2 2% % 2% % -2% - -2% - Multifamily Building Permits: Aug @ 522K 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14-6% -6% - 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14-9% Apartment Supply & Demand Percent, Thousands of Units 5.% Apartment Effective Rent Growth Quarter-over-Quarter Percent Change 2.% 75 4.% % 7% 3.% % 6% 25 2.%. 1.%..%.% -25-1.% -2.% -3.% -4.% Quarter-over-Quarter: Q2 @ 1.1% (Right Axis) Year-over-Year: Q2 @ 3.7% (Left Axis) -. -. -% -% 3% Apartment Net Completions: Q2 @ 46,417 Units (Right Axis) Apartment Net Absorption: Q2 @ 44,48 Units (Right Axis) Apartment Vacancy Rate: Q2 @ 4.2% (Left Axis) 2% 25 26 27 28 29 2 211 212 213 214 215 - -75-5.% 26 27 28 29 2 211 212 213 214 215-2.% Source: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, REIS Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 6
Buying Conditions % 9% While buying conditions remain relatively favorable, they have fallen back from the highs reached in 213. Tight inventories and the entrance of institutional investor buyers have allowed home prices to rise faster than incomes, which has reduced affordability. With the Fed looking to begin normalizing its short-term target rate this year, we expect mortgage rates to gradually rise over the next few years, which will likely reduce affordability even further. Despite a further decline in overall housing affordability, mortgage rates should remain low relative to their historical norms. Demographics should also turn more favorable, with more Millennials forming families and buying homes. Confidence: Plans to Buy a Home Percent of Consumers, Conference Board Plans to Buy a Home Within Six Months: Sep @ 6.3% 12-Month Moving Average: Sep @ 5. % 9% 22 2 18 16 14 12 Housing Affordability, NAR-Home Sales Base = Housing Affordability Index: Jul @ 15 6-Month Moving Average: Jul @ 163.2 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 19 17 1 13 U.S. Real Home Prices Index, Jan. 2=, Not Seasonally Adjusted U.S. Real Home Prices: Jul @ 134.5 Trough Trend * CoreLogic HPI Deflated with CPI Less Shelter 22 2 18 16 14 12 8 19 17 1 13 7% 7% 1 1 6% 6% 9 9 7 7 3% 3% 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 3 6 9 12 15 2% 2% 1% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 6% Occupied Housing Units Year-over-Year Percent Change Owner Occupied: Q2 @ -.3% Renter Occupied: Q2 @ 5.1% 1% 6% 2. S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index P/E Ratio January 1987=1, Seasonally Adjusted S&P Case-Shiller P/E Ratio: Jul @ 1.33 S&P Case-Shiller C- Home Price Index Divided by CPI Owners' Equivalent Rent 2. 3% 3% 2% 2% 1% % 1% % 1. 1. -1% -1%.8 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15.8-2% -2% -3% 85 88 91 94 97 3 6 9 12-3% Source: CoreLogic, S&P, Federal Reserve, Conference Board, NAR, U.S. Dept. of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 7
New Home Sales New home sales rose 5.7 percent in August to a 552,-unit annual pace. Sales have risen in four of the past five months and are up more than 5 percent this year. The rise in sales is consistent with the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index, which hit a new cycle high in September. Although inventory levels have risen moderately over the past few months, the level of completed homes inventory remains exceptionally tight. Completed inventories fell in August and remain near an all-time low at 48, units. With overall sales still historically low, builders have been focusing on higher-priced, highermargin homes. The median sales price rose.3 percent over the year to $294,7 in August. 4 1 14 Inventory of New Homes for Sale Non-Seasonally Adjusted, In Thousands Inventory: Aug @ 221, Completed New Homes: Aug @ 46, 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Months' Supply of New Homes Seasonally Adjusted 4 1 14 1,6 1, New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Thousands of Units, SAAR, Index New Home Sales: Aug @ 552. (Left Axis) NAHB Wells Fargo Index: Sep @ 62. (Right Axis) 1 12 12 1,3 9 1,2 8 8 8 1, 7 9 6 6 6 7 4 4 4 4 3 2 Months' Supply: Aug @ 4.7 2 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 2 1 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 18 New Home Sales New Homes Sold During Month, Index 22=, 3-MMA 18 $325 $ Median New & Existing Home Sale Prices In Thousands, Single-Family Median New Sales Price: Aug @ $292,7 Median Existing Sales Price: Aug @ $23,2 $325 $ 16 14 12 16 14 12 $275 $275 8 8 $2 $2 6 6 $225 $2 $175 $225 $2 $175 4 South: Aug @ 73.4 Midwest: Aug @ 34.3 2 West: Aug @ 54.6 Northeast: Aug @ 46.3 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 4 2 $1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 $1 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Association of Realtors and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 8
Existing Home Sales 7.5 Existing home sales slipped slightly in August, and fell to a 5.31 million-unit pace. Although sales slowed moderately, they remain up 6.2 percent over the past year. Inventory levels remain low relative to historical norms and declined 1.7 percent year-over-year in August. Tight supplies and rising home prices are likely keeping some potential buyers on the sideline, and restraining overall sales. The proportion of first-time home buyers rose to 32 percent and is back at its cycle high. The increase in first-time buyers is an encouraging sign and may indicate that the long slide in the homeownership rate is finally reaching a bottom. Existing Home Sales Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate, In Millions 7.5 5 % 4 3 3% 2 2% 1 % U.S. Distressed Home Sales Percent of Total Sales Total Distressed: Aug @ 7.% % 29 2 211 212 213 214 215 36% 33% First-Time Home Buyers Share of Existing Home Sales Share of Total Existing Home Sales: Aug @ 32.% 5 % 4 3 3% 2 2% 1 % % 36% 33% 7. 7. 6.5 6.5 3% 3% 6. 6. 5.5 5.5 27% 27% 5. 5. 4.5 4.5 2 2 4. 4. 3.5 Existing Home Sales: Aug @ 5.31M 3.5 3. 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 3. 2 Percent Change in Existing-Home Sales Year-over-Year Percent Change, By Price Range 2 4.5 4. Single-Family Home Inventory Millions of Units New Homes: Aug @.22M Existing Homes: Aug @ 2.3M 4.5 4. 2% 1 % 2% 1 % 3.5 3. 3.5 3. 2.5 2.5 % % 2. 2. - - 1.5 1. 1.5 1. -% -1 August 215 $-K $-2K $2-K $-7K $7-1M $1M+ -% -1.5.5. 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15. Source: NAR, U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 9
Home Prices 2 2% 1 % % - -% Most measures of home price appreciation have stabilized around 5 percent year-over-year growth. According to the S&P Case Shiller 2-City Index, prices grew 5. percent year-over-year in July with San Francisco, Denver, Dallas and Portland reporting the largest price gains from a year earlier. On the other hand, housing markets in New York City, Chicago and Washington, D.C., saw the pace of price appreciation slow modestly. Some of the largest gains in home prices have been in large gateway markets, such as San Francisco, Los Angeles Seattle, Miami, New York City and Chicago. Foreign purchases have cooled a bit more recently, however, and may be contributing to the recent moderation in price appreciation. Home Prices Year-over-Year Percentage Change 2 2% 1 % % - -% 15.% 12..% 7. 5.% 2..% -2. -5.% -7. -.% FHFA Purchase-Only Index, NSA Bars = Q/Q % Change Line = Yr/Yr % Change Purchase-Only Index: Q2 @ 3. (Right Axis) Purchase-Only Index: Q2 @ 5. (Left Axis) -12. 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 San Francisco Denver Dallas Portland Seattle Miami Las Vegas Los Angeles Atlanta Tampa San Diego Detroit Charlotte Phoenix Boston Minneapolis Cleveland New York City Chicago Washington, D.C. S&P/Case-Shiller Home Prices Year-over-Year Percent Change, NSA 7.3% 7.3% 6.2% 6.1% 5. 5. 5. 5. 4.9% 4.6% 4.3% 3.6% 3.1% 1.9% % 1.7% 8.7% 8...3% 5.% 4.% 3.% 2.% 1.%.% -1.% -2.% -3.% -4.% -5.% -6.% -1-2% Median Sale Price: Aug @ $23,2 Median Sale Price, 3-M Mov Avg: Aug @ 5.6% -2 FHFA Purchase Only Index: Jul @ 5. S&P/Case-Shiller Composite-: Jul @ 4. -3% 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15-1 -2% -2-3% 2% C- C-2 4. 5.% July 215 % 2% 6% % 12% Median Single-Family Existing Home Price Year-over-Year Percentage Change 2% CoreLogic HPI: United States Year-over-Year Percent Change 16% 12% 16% 12% 2% 2% 16% 16% 12% 12% % - - -12% % - - -12% % % -16% -16% - - -12% - - -12% -2% Median Price Change: Aug @ 5.1% -2 6-Month Moving Average: Aug @ 7.1% Median Sale Price: Aug @ $23,2-2 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15-2% -2-2 -16% United States: Jul @ 6.9% -2% 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14-16% -2% Source: CoreLogic, NAR, S&P, FHFA, U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Renovation and Remodeling $1, $1, Spending for renovations and remodeling continues to trend higher. Spending was driven primarily by investor purchasers earlier in the recovery who converted single-family homes and condominiums into rental units. More recently, remodeling outlays have been driven by rising home values and improving consumer confidence. In recent years, many homeowners refinanced their homes and are now more apt to remain in place, given that they are building equity in an appreciating asset, something that is hard to find right now. Moreover, the increased appeal of urban living continues to support renovations to the existing stock of homes located close to key major cities and key employment centers. $9 $8 $7 $ $ $4 $ $2 Residential Investment Billions of Dollars Other: Q2 @ $7.7 B Brokers' Commissions: Q2 @ $142.6 B Improvements: Q2 @ $176.7 B New Building: Q2 @ $263.6 B $1, $1, $9 $8 $7 $ $ $4 $ $2 3% 2% % % -% -2% -3% - Residential Investment Year-over-Year Percent Change Improvements: Q2 @ 4.% Res. Investment Ex. Improvements: Q2 @ 14. -% 1996 1998 2 22 24 26 28 2 212 214 65 6 55 45 4 35 3 25 2 NAHB Remodeling Market Index Index, Seasonally Adjusted Overall Index: Q2 @ 58.8 15 Future Expectations: Q2 @ 58.4 Backlog of Remodeling Jobs: Q2 @ 58.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 3% 2% % % -% -2% -3% - -% 65 6 55 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 $ $ 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 12 14 $ $ Share of Owner-Occupied Housing Year Structure Built - 213 $16 Leading Indicator of Remodeling Activity In Billions, 4-Q Moving Total, Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies JCHS Forecast $16 199 to 1999 1 2 to 29 1 $1 $1 198 to 1989 12% $14 $14 $13 $13 197 to 1979 17% 1969 or earlier 41% $12 $12 $1 $1 $ 29 2 211 212 213 214 215 $ Source: Joint Center for Housing Studies, U.S. Department of Commerce, NAHB and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 11
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC Economics Group Diane Schumaker-Krieg Global Head of Research, Economics & Strategy (74) 4-181 (212) 214-7 diane.schumaker@wellsfargo.com John E. Silvia, Ph.D. Chief Economist (74) 4-3275 john.silvia@wellsfargo.com Mark Vitner Senior Economist (74) 4-3277 mark.vitner@wellsfargo.com Jay H. Bryson, Ph.D. Global Economist (74) 4-3274 jay.bryson@wellsfargo.com Sam Bullard Senior Economist (74) 4-328 sam.bullard@wellsfargo.com Nick Bennenbroek Currency Strategist (212) 214-5636 nicholas.bennenbroek@wellsfargo.com Eugenio J. Alemán, Ph.D. Senior Economist (74) 4-3273 eugenio.j.aleman@wellsfargo.com Anika R. Khan Senior Economist (74) 4-3271 anika.khan@wellsfargo.com Azhar Iqbal Econometrician (74) 4-327 azhar.iqbal@wellsfargo.com Tim Quinlan Economist (74) 4-3283 tim.quinlan@wellsfargo.com Eric Viloria, CFA Currency Strategist (212) 214-5637 eric.viloria@wellsfargo.com Sarah House Economist (74) 4-3282 sarah.house@wellsfargo.com Michael A. Brown Economist (74) 4-3278 michael.a.brown@wellsfargo.com Erik Nelson Economic Analyst (74) 4-3267 erik.f.nelson@wellsfargo.com Alex Moehring Economic Analyst (74) 4-3247 alex.v.moehring@wellsfargo.com Misa Batcheller Economic Analyst (74) 4-36 misa.n.batcheller@wellsfargo.com Michael Pugliese Economic Analyst (74) 4-3156 michael.d.pugliese@wellsfargo.com Donna LaFleur Executive Assistant (74) 4-3279 donna.lafleur@wellsfargo.com Cyndi Burris Senior Admin. Assistant (74) 4-3272 cyndi.burris@wellsfargo.com Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group publications are produced by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, a U.S broker-dealer registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and the Securities Investor Protection Corp. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, distributes these publications directly and through subsidiaries including, but not limited to, Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, Wells Fargo Securities International Limited, Wells Fargo Securities Asia Limited and Wells Fargo Securities (Japan) Co. Limited. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. ("WFS") is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a futures commission merchant and is a member in good standing of the National Futures Association. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("WFBNA") is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a swap dealer and is a member in good standing of the National Futures Association. WFS and WFBNA are generally engaged in the trading of futures and derivative products, any of which may be discussed within this publication. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not compensate its research analysts based on specific investment banking transactions. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC s research analysts receive compensation that is based upon and impacted by the overall profitability and revenue of the firm which includes, but is not limited to investment banking revenue. The information and opinions herein are for general information use only. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, nor does Wells Fargo Securities, LLC assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice, are for general information only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sales of any security or as personalized investment advice. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is a separate legal entity and distinct from affiliated banks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company 215 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. Important Information for Non-U.S. Recipients For recipients in the EEA, this report is distributed by Wells Fargo Securities International Limited ("WFSIL"). WFSIL is a U.K. incorporated investment firm authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this report has been approved by WFSIL a regulated person under the Act. For purposes of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority s rules, this report constitutes impartial investment research. WFSIL does not deal with retail clients as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 27. The FCA rules made under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2 for the protection of retail clients will therefore not apply, nor will the Financial Services Compensation Scheme be available. This report is not intended for, and should not be relied upon by, retail clients. This document and any other materials accompanying this document (collectively, the "Materials") are provided for general informational purposes only. SECURITIES: NOT FDIC-INSURED/NOT BANK-GUARANTEED/MAY LOSE VALUE