PUBLIC DEFENDER SOURCE OF FUNDS USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating Capital Positions $ 9,272,526

Similar documents
PUBLIC DEFENDER SOURCE OF FUNDS USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating Capital Positions $ 10,290,180 -

SOCIAL SERVICES SOURCE OF FUNDS. USE OF FUNDS Other Financing Uses 1% STAFFING TREND. Budget & Staffing Operating Capital FTEs

ALCOHOL, DRUG & MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

Court Special Services

AUDITOR-CONTROLLER SOURCE OF FUNDS USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating $ Capital Positions 5,422,872 10,

City of. Carmelita Flagpole, circa 1927

Northern Branch Jail Project

AGRICULTURE & COOPERATIVE EXTENSION

District Attorney. Joyce E. Dudley District Attorney. Administration & Support BUDGET & FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART

Public Defender RECOMMENDED BUDGET & STAFFING SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 12,293,600 Capital $ 0 FTEs 64.

District Attorney BUDGET & FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 23,331,118 Capital $ 0 FTEs 133.2

Social Services BUDGET & FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 172,296,373 Capital $ 743,500 FTEs 893.

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAN SCULLY DISTRICT ATTORNEY MEDIA ADVISORY. DA Scully s Budget Presentation to Board of Supervisors

Department Program $ Under/(Over) Budget. Notes

No data was reported to P.E.A.K.

Defender Association of Philadelphia FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET TESTIMONY April 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FY Recommended and Proposed Budgets at a Glance. (in millions)

Probation. Leading the Way to a Safer Community BUDGET & FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART

Probation BUDGET & FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 51,708,206 Capital $ - FTEs 338.0

General Fund Contribution and/or FTE Requests-All Depts ( ) Ongoing Requested GFC

Recommended Budget Hearings Fiscal Year

BUDGET WORKSHOP

JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS DISTRICT COURT Earl J. Conklin, Director of Court Services. FY 2020 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

GENERAL SERVICES SOURCE OF FUNDS. USE OF FUNDS Other Financing Uses 10.93% STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating Capital Positions

Circuit Court of Cook County Performance Metrics Department Social Service. 1-Administration

Our Mission: Partnering to make the justice system work

Social Services BUDGET & FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 167,706,391 Capital $ 1,577,500 FTEs 735.

Department of Juvenile Justice. FY2011 Amended and FY2012 Impact Statements for Budget Reductions. August 2010

206 Child Support Services Jim Kucharek, Child Support Services Director

Attachment A-1 CEO Recommended Expansions ( )

FY Bill Brown Sheriff. Custody Operations. Countywide Law Enforcement. Administration. Courts Services ONE COUNTY. ONE FUTURE.

PUBLIC DEFENDER 0101 GENERAL FUND

PUBLIC DEFENDER. Mission

PUBLIC DEFENDER Keri Klein, Public Defender

TARRANT COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT

CITY OF PASADENA CITY ATTORNEY

Summary Probation William Burke, Chief Probation Officer

GENERAL SERVICES SOURCE OF FUNDS USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating. Department Director/ Administration

General County Programs

BUDGET WORKSHOP

FY16 Actual FY17 Budget FY18 Budget

Increase/ Departmental Summary Actual Actual Actual Actual Request Adopted (Decrease)

Public Defender RECOMMENDED BUDGET FY

Third Quarter Financial Report July 2015 March 2016

Section F. Annual Budgetary Processes, Policies, & Fund Structure

City and County of San Francisco

FY 05 Actual FY 06 Budget FY 07 Budget

Sheriff RECOMMENDED BUDGET & STAFFING SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 147,239,600 Capital $ 182,000 FTEs

GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS

MID-YEAR FISCAL REVIEW - FISCAL YEAR

Community Corrections Partnership AB 109 Funds

COUNTY COUNSEL. Alison Barratt-Green, County Counsel. County Counsel (10301) $ 1,393,544. Total $ 1,393,544 NEVADA COUNTY BUDGET

County Executive Office

CLERK-RECORDER-ASSESSOR

¾Adult Detention Center

FY17 Actual FY18 Budget FY19 Budget

Circuit Court Judges. Mission Statement. Citizens. Chief Judge. Judges. Circuit Court Judges Chamber. Judicial Administration

PUBLIC SAFETY & LEGAL SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS

LB 472 and Leveraging Federal Dollars to Reform Corrections

PUBLIC DEFENDER EXPANSION IDS PRESENTATION TO HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE February 20, 2014

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

County Executive Office

Mental Health Services Department Budget Unit 4120 Department Head: James Waterman, Appointed

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S 2015 BUDGET SUMMARY

GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS

Auditor Controller RECOMMENDED BUDGET & STAFFING SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 9,056,800 Capital $ 15,000 FTEs 48.

District Attorney. Department Narrative and Strategic Plan 2. Summary of Revenue and Expense District Attorney Fund 6

KANSAS BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Section F. Annual Budgetary Processes, Policies, & Fund Structure

COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE

FY 2016 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

ASSISTANCE. Actu al Ado pted Est. Actual Recommended Source of Funds FY FY FY FY 10-11

Santa Barbara County

District 3 Dan Miller Chair

Community Corrections. Department Narrative and Strategic Plan 2. Summary of Revenue and Expense Community Corrections Fund 4

Clerk of Courts. Clerk of Courts * General Court Support * Alternatives to Incarceration * Guardian ad Litem

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

County of Orange. Chairwoman Lisa A. Bartlett, Supervisor, Fifth District Members, Board of Supervisors. Fiscal Year Recommended Budget

Public Safety. Sheriff's Office $10,185, % General District Court $271, % Public Safety Expenditure Budget: $302,556,394

Harris County, Texas Justice of the Peace Court Staff Workload Project National Center for State Courts. Justice of the Peace Court Staffing Survey

Adult Detention Center

Rock County 2019 Recommended Budget and Administrative Report. Josh Smith, County Administrator October 11, 2018

O r g a n i z a t i o n s

Department Budget. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Actuals Adopted Requested Recommended

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff and Respondent, ) v. ) Defendant and Appellant.

Meeting of the Community Corrections Partnership Executive Committee (CCPEC)

Pierce County, Washington 2017 Budget

Fire. Public Safety D-75

OFFICE MEGAN A. RING. Tuesday, OSPD 1

PROGRAM I - PUBLIC PROTECTION FY BUDGET AUGMENTATION REQUEST SUMMARY

County Counsel BUDGET & FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART. Operating $ 7,438,480 Capital $ - FTEs 38.5

FY Adopted. Beginning Available Balance $46,537, $56,700, $10,162,737.00

DENVER SHERIFF DEPARTMENT BUDGET REVIEW

COUNTY COUNSEL Alison Barratt-Green, County Counsel

FISCAL YEAR BUDGET REQUEST. November 1, Lindy Frolich, Director

Note: Further meeting documents can found online at:

Stanislaus County. Mental Health Services Act. Community Services and Supports. Additional Planning Estimate Funds Request For Fiscal Year 2008/09

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW Fiscal Year Recommended Budget

FY 2015 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

Cumberland County. Strategic Results

Transcription:

Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating Capital Positions $ 9,272,526-58.6 FTEs Gregory C. Paraskou Public Defender SOURCE OF FUNDS Other Financing Sources 4% Departmental Revenues 27% Administration Juvenile Legal Services Adult Legal Services Investigative Services General Fund Contribution 69% Support Services USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND Support Services 15% Administration 8% Adopted Positions (FTEs) 75 65 71.7 71.4 69.1 68.7 68.7 69.7 68.8 69.1 68.1 55 58.6 45 2-1 21-2 22-3 23-4 24-5 25-6 26-7 27-8 28-9 29-1 Investigative Services 12% Juvenile Legal Services 6% Adult Legal Services 59% D-65

Department Summary Use of Funds Summary Operating Expenditures Administration $ 68,55 $ 683,88 $ 84,57 $ 717,977 Adult Legal Services 6,25,762 6,318,782 5,681,531 5,449,69 Juvenile Legal Services 463,769 596,38 488,622 59,758 Investigative Services 1,7,64 1,187,11 1,261,173 1,121,758 Support Services 1,193,598 1,54,83 1,64,6 1,392,424 Expenditure Total 9,433,248 1,29,181 9,876,496 9,272,526 Other Financing Uses Operating Transfers 6,551 6,874 6,874 6,873 Department Total $ 9,439,799 $ 1,297,55 $ 9,883,37 $ 9,279,399 Source of Funds Summary Departmental Revenues Federal & State Revenues $ 2,795,891 $ 2,786,329 $ 2,467,922 $ 2,349,524 Other Charges for Services 174,4 158,193 16,3 16, Revenue Total 2,97,291 2,944,522 2,627,925 2,59,524 General Fund Contribution 6,391,353 6,571,9 6,318,325 6,381,3 Other Financing Sources Operating Transfers 12,171 427, 427, -- Use of Prior Fund Balances 65,984 353,633 51,12 388,575 Department Total $ 9,439,799 $ 1,297,55 $ 9,883,37 $ 9,279,399 Character of Expenditures Operating Expenditures Regular Salaries $ 6,23,887 $ 6,654,617 $ 6,312,91 $ 6,82,56 Overtime 923 -- 5 -- Extra Help 356,264 -- 221,293 -- Benefits 2,149,424 2,653,73 2,415,147 2,349,355 Salaries & Benefits Sub-Total 8,53,498 9,37,69 8,949,355 8,431,861 Services & Supplies 92,75 982,491 927,141 84,665 Expenditure Total $ 9,433,248 $ 1,29,181 $ 9,876,496 $ 9,272,526 Position Summary Pos. FTE Pos. FTE Pos. FTE Pos. FTE Permanent Administration 8. 5.5 8. 4.9 8. 4.3 8. 4.9 Adult Legal Services 3. 32.3 31. 3.3 31. 31.8 3.8 25.9 Juvenile Legal Services 4. 2. 3. 2.9 3. 2. 3. 2.9 Investigative Services 12. 11.9 12. 11.7 12. 11.5 12. 9.7 Support Services 18.8 17. 18.8 18.3 18.8 16.7 18.8 15.1 Total Permanent 72.8 68.6 72.8 68.1 72.8 66.2 72.5 58.6 Non-Permanent Extra Help -- 6.2 -- -- -- 3.7 -- -- Total Positions 72.8 74.8 72.8 68.1 72.8 69.9 72.5 58.6 Note: Presentation of the individual program amounts for fiscal years 27-8 and 28-9 have been adjusted to provide a consistent level of detail with the fiscal year 29-1 budget, however, the totals for 27-8 and 28-9 have not been changed. Note: FTE and position totals may not sum correctly due to rounding. D-66

MISSION STATEMENT To provide zealous and professional legal representation of the highest quality to all clients and to create an environment that motivates and enables all employees to achieve this mission. Budget Organization The cost centers of the Law Office of the Public Defender are Administration, Adult Legal Services, Juvenile Legal Services, Investigative Services, and Support Services. All employees are located in offices adjacent to Court facilities in Santa Maria (Superior Court and Juvenile), Lompoc (Superior Court), and Santa Barbara (Superior Court and Juvenile). The Law Office employs thirty attorneys including the Public Defender and two Assistant Public Defenders (one manages the North County Office and the other manages the South County Office) and a support staff of thirty-one including a business manager, departmental analyst, information systems administrator, investigators, social service practitioners, a paralegal, legal secretaries, accounting assistant, and data entry operators. Activity Indicators 8 6 4 2 25 2 15 1 5 3 25 2 15 1 5 New Adult Felony Therapeutic Cases 499 526 525 716 613 512 5 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 *8-9 *9-1 19,713 New Adult Crim inal Cases 21,246 22,4 22,566 2,988 18,533 17,5 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 *8-9 *9-1 2,57 New Juvenile Crim inal Cases 2,462 2,299 2,434 2,281 2,145 1,931 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 *8-9 *9-1 * Projected Adult therapeutic court cases include Clean & Sober, Domestic Violence Review, Proposition 36 and Substance Abuse Treatment Court. These cases place Public Defender clients in treatment programs thus relieving jail overcrowding. Adult criminal cases have decreased approximately 21% in the last five years The juvenile caseload has decreased approximately 16% in the last five years. Significant Changes (FY 28-9 Adopted to FY 28-9 Estimated Actual) Estimated Actual operating expenditures decreased by $414,, to $9,876,, from the Adopted Budget of $1,29,. This 4.% decrease is the result of: -$284, Retirement contributions lower than anticipated due to leaves of absence and vacancies; -$271, Salary expense lower than anticipated due to leaves of absence and vacancies; -$8, Decrease in miscellaneous expenses; +$221, Additional extra help costs to fill in behind leaves of absence and to meet caseload demands. Estimated Actual operating revenues decreased by $317,, to $2,628,, from the Adopted Budget of $2,945,. This 1.8% decrease is the result of: -$31, Lower than anticipated Public Safety Sales Tax revenue; -$7, Decrease in miscellaneous other revenues. Additionally, the Department released $156, from the salary and retirement offset designation to fund ongoing operations for Fiscal Year 28-9. Significant Changes (FY 28-9 Estimated Actual to FY 29-1 Recommended) The Recommended Budget s operating expenditures decreased by $63, to $9,273, from the prior year s Estimated Actual of $9,876,. This 6.1% decrease is the result of: -$23, Decreased salaries due to layoffs; -$221, Reduced extra help attorney staff; -$133, Decreased workers compensation expense; -$19, Decreased various expenses. The Recommended Budget s operating revenues decreased by $118,, to $2,51,, from the prior year s Estimated Actual of $2,628,. This 4.5% decrease is the result of: -$127, Lower Public Safety Sales Tax revenue; +$9, Change in SB 9 mandated costs reimbursement. Capital Asset Expenditures: Public Defender Capital Asset expenditures for FY 29-1 is $ as the Department s Santa Barbara office remodel project is budgeted in the General Services Department for $3,657, pending action on the issuance of Certificates of Participation and Board direction to proceed with the project. D-67

The Fiscal Year 29 21 constraints require the Public Defender to implement additional service level reductions. In FY 28-9, the Public Defender declared unavailability on certain numbers of cases due to budget reductions and the loss of attorney staff. For FY 29-1 the cuts to the department budget result in a loss of five attorneys (16% of existing staff) and six support staff. The Public Defender has indicated unavailability will be declared on an even greater number of cases since the reduced staff will not be able to handle the current case and work loads. Thus, in order to avoid declaring unavailability, the Public Defender will seek additional funding based on the estimated caseload in FY 29-1. This cost issue is compounded because it is almost certain that if the Public Defender receives additional funded positions, the District Attorney will request the 3 to 2 (DA's to PD's) ratio which would result in further drawdown of the Strategic Reserve or additional reductions to other departments. The issue of an administrative official being able to compel the County to commit budget resources (either staff or contract) raises a fundamental constitutional question. This is ostensibly under Court doctrine (Gideon v. Wainwright and subsequent cases which require that all defendants have a lawyer). Is the Legislative Branch (in this case the Board of Supervisors) in charge of financing or not? Departmental Priorities and Their Alignment With County Goals The Law Office of the Public Defender s strategic actions are primarily aligned with the following adopted County Strategic Goals: Goal 1: Efficient and Responsive Government: An Efficient, Professionally Managed Government Able to Anticipate and to Effectively Respond to the Needs of the Community; Goal 2: Health and Safety: Safe and Healthy Community in Which to Live, Work and Visit; and Goal 6: Families and Children: A Community that Fosters the Safety and Well-Being of Families and Children. Among the eight Critical Issues, the issue of Health Care & Social Services Delivery will take priority for FY 29-1 in the form of continued development of therapy court s alternative sentencing and continued zealous representation of adult and juvenile clients. The Office of the Public Defender continues providing effective leadership and promoting collaborative partnerships to deliver the highest quality of service to our clients. Focus Area: Therapeutic Courts: Current Year (FY 8-9) Accomplishments: Collaborated with the Courts, Mental Health, Probation, Sheriff, District Attorney, and community organizations to improve the functioning of the Therapeutic Courts (Substance Abuse Treatment Court, Proposition 36, Juvenile Drug Court, Domestic Violence Review Court, Dual Diagnosis and Mental Health Treatment Court, and the new DUI Review Court). Assisted 721 clients to enter the alcohol and drug treatment programs instead of incarceration, saving the County money and helping to reduce the jail overcrowding problem. Continued to represent 1,71 clients in these ongoing Therapeutic Court review appearances. These court programs have proven to be successful at rehabilitation, reducing recidivism, enhancing public safety, and helping individuals to become productive members of the community. Proposed Strategic Action: Improve and increase the Department s ability to more quickly transition in-custody clients out of the jail and into treatment programs. Proposed Key Project: Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of the Treatment Programs. A UCLA Study of Proposition 36 outcomes found that for every dollar spent there was a savings of $2.5 $4.. A UCSB Report of the 27-28 data shows that 66% of both Proposition 36 and Substance Abuse Treatment Court Program participants successfully completed the Program. It calculated the jail cost savings to be $838,831 (7,49 jail days at $119/day). The five year total amounts to a savings to county taxpayers of $5,192,92 in jail costs. The Public Defender s Office would seek additional funds of $42,55 for a new Social Services Case Aide to enhance the Department s ability to more expeditiously identify those incustody clients who can benefit from the treatment programs, find a placement for them, and get them out of the jail as soon as possible. 3 25 2 15 1 5 2,281 1,245 1,36 1,35 1,189 Santa Barbara County Public Defender Total Number of Therapeutic Cases 2,539 2,622 1,494 1,313 1,128 1,15 2,463 2,469 2,541 1,78 1,391 1,6 1,535 721 1,792 1,71 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 *8-9 New Carryover Total * Projected D-68

Focus Area: Litigation: Current Year (FY 8-9) Accomplishments: Initiated a collaborative process with the courts to establish an automatic mechanism for the assessment of Public Defender attorney fees. Continued to work with Department and County staff to maintain the assessment and collection levels. The Department is currently on pace to exceed $143, in assessed fees and $152, in collected fees. Continued to enhance Department effectiveness through in-house training for attorneys as a California State Bar approved provider of Mandatory Continuing Legal Education. A success rate of 4% in jury trials (clients found not guilty, guilty of a lesser offense, dismissal after a hung jury or mistrial) in 28. Completed the design for the remodel of the Santa Barbara office space in the historic Courthouse Annex to provide a safe and secure facility for employees, increase client and public access (including disabled access), and improve efficiency and workflow. Proposed Strategic Actions: Bring in outside speakers on various legal, ethical, and trial practice topics to provide low cost training to the attorney staff and provide training for all support staff at minimal cost to the County. Collaborate with the District Attorney s Office to increase the use of electronic information transfer of reports and other discovery material. Redesign the Public Defender website to make it more user-friendly, informative and professional. Proposed Key Projects: Obtain funding for the remodel project of the South County office space in the historic Courthouse Annex. Continue to collaborate with the courts to complete the process to increase the assessment of Public Defender attorney fees. Santa Barbara County Public Defender Total Number of New Cases 3 25 25,723 27,118 25,68 25,984 24,49 21,859 2 15 1 13,293 12,43 13,826 13,292 13,298 13,731 12,31 12,253 13,9 11,4 11,179 1,68 5 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 *8-9 North County South County Total * Projected The Santa Barbara Courthouse, a National Historic Landmark. D-69

Position Detail Pos. Pos. Pos. Pos. Administration Public Defender 1. 1. 1. 1. Assistant Public Defender 2. 2. 2. 2. Business Leader 1. 1. 1. 1. Computer Systems Specialist 1. 1. 1. 1. Departmental Analyst 1. 1. 1. 1. Executive Secretary 1. 1. 1. 1. Accounting Assistant 1. 1. 1. 1. Sub-Division Total 8. 8. 8. 8. Adult Legal Services Deputy Public Defender 29. 3. 3. 29.8 Paralegal 1. 1. 1. 1. Sub-Division Total 3. 31. 31. 3.8 Juveni le Legal Services Deputy Public Defender 4. 3. 3. 3. Sub-Division Tot al 4. 3. 3. 3. Investigative Services Chief Investigator 1. 1. 1. 1. Legal Office Professional -- -- -- 3. Investigat or 6. 6. 6. 6. Social Services Practitioner 2. 2. 2. 2. Investigative Assistant 3. 3. 3. -- Sub-Division Total 12. 12. 12. 12. Support Services Legal Office Professional -- -- -- 18.8 Legal Secretary 13. 13. 13. -- Legal Interpreter 1.8 1.8 1.8 -- Data Entry Operator 2. 2. 2. -- Office Assistant 2. 2. 2. -- Sub-Division Total 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 Division Total 72.8 72.8 72.8 72.5 Recurring Performance Measures Administration To ensure an efficient and responsive government, the County will maintain the number of General Liability claims filed at no more than 9-1% of the previous year's actual claims filed. As an efficient and responsive government, the County will maintain the number of Workers' Compensat ion claims f iled between 9-1% of the previous year's actual claims f iled. As an efficient and responsive government, the County will maintain a productive workforce through a countywide Lost Time Rate of 5.9% or less when measuring lost hours to total budgeted hours. As an efficient and responsive government, the County will maintain a quality workforce through completing 95-1% of departmental Employee Performance Reviews (EPRs) by the Anniversary Due Date. Adult Legal Services 1% of 28 attorneys will attend at least three criminal law and education programs annually. Public Defender will meet annually with 13 Superior Court adult and juvenile criminal law judges to assess quality, representation, and service to the Court. Collaborate with Criminal Justice and County government partners on 6 projects annually to accomplish systemic improvements. 1% 1% 2% 1% 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1% 1% 1% 1% 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 7% 8% 7% 7% 1,461 1,624 1,997 9,238 142,448 141,648 148,611 124,833 51% 1% 42% 1% 37 74 31 63 72 74 74 63 33 33 11 28 14 14 13 13 6 6 6 6 D-7

Recurring Performance Measures Investigative Services 1% of 1 investigators/social workers will attend at least two specialized criminal law/investigation programs annually. 1% 1% 1% 1% 24 24 24 2 24 24 24 2 Investigative staff will personally contact 1% of an estimated 284 clients who are deemed unable to care for themselves or a threat to themselves or others within 48 hours of receiving such notices to determine if an appeal is requested 1% 1% 1% 1% 276 258 292 284 276 258 292 284 Support Services 1% of 15 secretarial/clerical employees will attend at least one job-related class taught by a qualified instructor/organization or the County's Employee's University 1% 1% 1% 1% 18 18 18 15 18 18 18 15 This page intentionally left blank. Complete appropriate file documentation within 1 working days for 1% of an estimated 21,5 cases closed. 94% 1% 94% 94% 23,593 25,5 21,388 2,21 25,228 25,5 22,753 21,5 D-71

D-72