Japan experiences of evaluating insurance effectiveness: The role of governments

Similar documents
Announcement on the Revision of the Standard Full Rates for Earthquake Insurance

Establishing the earthquake

EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE IN JAPAN

EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE IN JAPAN

Earthquake Insurance. Establishing the earthquake insurance system. Mechanism of the earthquake

Regional Economic Report (Summary)

Business Outline. Business Report

Elderly people based on seven types of data


1.Consolidated Operating Results

Wholesale trade Retail trade. 10 Value of goods in stock. Annual sales of goods

White Paper on Local Public Finance, 2017

Life Insurance Fact Book (2017)

FY2014 Settlement White Paper on Local Public Finance, Illustrated

Flash Report on the Consolidated result for the third quarter ended November 30, 2006

the Great East Japan earthquake

White Paper on Local Public Finance, 2011

1. Main Results Data Main Financial Data Information Disclosure 145. Disclosure Brochures 145 Japan Post Websites 145

What types of firms relocate their headquarters and why? Analyzing the effects of the dual corporate tax system

Table of Contents P 2 P 4 P 10 P 11 P 12 P 13 P 14 P 17 P 18 P 19

Fund Trends in the Household Sector from 2011

FamilyMart. Summary of selected data for the 1st half of FYE February 2007

THE AP-GfK POLL: JAPAN

Results for FY2014 ended Mar. 31, 2015

White Paper on Local Public Finance, 2009

The Financial Problems of the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief

Financial Literacy Survey: 2016 Results*

Table of Contents. Introduction... 2

Annual Report. Introduction to Earthquake Reinsurance in Japan

FY2016 Earnings Results Briefing (Reference materials) June 1, 2017

1H FY2016 Earnings Results Briefing (Reference materials) December 2, 2016

Long-Term Unemployment in Japan in the Global Financial Crisis and Recession *

(3) Status of cash flows during the current fiscal year Cash and cash equivalents (hereinafter, funds ) at the end of the current fiscal year

Ranking Name of Prefecture GNS

Flash Report on the Consolidated Result for the First Half Ended February 28, 2014

CGC s Basic Principle

A New Departure in the Japanese Minimum Wage Legislation

&KDOOHQJHV#DQG#3URVSHFWV#IRU#WKH#-DSDQHVH#3),

The Present Situation and Problems of the FCA in Japan

Financial Results for FY15/16

Regional Differences in the Sale of Individual Annuities in Japan

IR Seminar in December 2017

Regional Banks in Japan 2008

Is There a Stable Money Demand Function under the Low Interest Rate Policy? A Panel Data Analysis

Community Rating, Cross Subsidies and Underinsurance: Why So Many Households in Japan Do Not Purchase Earthquake Insurance *

Panel Data Research Center at Keio University DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES

Profile of Japan Post Bank

Flash Report on the Consolidated Financial Results for the Third Quarter of the Fiscal Year Ending February 28, 2019 January 10, 2019

Aging and Real Estate Prices: Evidence from Japanese and US Regional Data

Brief Summary of FY2018

Trends in Structural and Frictional Unemployment

Regional Divergences in Unemployment Rates in Japan and Their Factors

Changes in Japan's Labor Market Flows due to the Lost Decade

Discussion Paper Series A No.603. An Analysis of Regional Business Cycles using Prefectural Composite Indexes in Japan

Taxes and Transfers in Japan s Local Public Finances

ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF INFRASTRUCTURE JAPAN S EXPERIENCE AFTER WORLD WAR II*

BUSINESS REPORT Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2016

Revisiting finance-trade linkage during the Great Trade Collapse. September 2016 (Work in Progress, not to be cited)

Is Minimum Wage an Effective Anti-Poverty Policy in Japan?

Ⅱ Explanation of Terms

Financial Report 2009

Fully diluted profit per share. Return on equity. Total assets Net assets

Annual Report. For the year ended March 31, 2016

Homeless People in Japan:

First Quarter of the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2018 Results of Operations. Evolable Asia Corp. TSE 1st Section : 6191 February 14, 2018

NOTICE OF THE 26TH ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Flash Report on the Consolidated Result for the Year Ended February 28, 2015 April 9, 2015

NITTSU SHOJI REPORT. (April 1, 2004 March 31, 2005)

THE SAMURAI BOND: CREDIT SUPPLY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN PRE-WAR JAPAN SERGI BASCO UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III JOHN P. TANG

Kyoto Prefecture Financial Profile and Fiscal Reforms Oct.

Tackling Global Environmental Issues Focusing on Climate Change

How Inclusive Is Abenomics?

FY17/6 Earnings. 1. Financial Results for FY17/6 (October 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017) (1) Earnings (JPY million; year-on-year change) Operating

SEMIANNUAL REPORT. Fiscal Period Ended May 31, 2013

Regional Population Projections for Japan: Overview of the Method

The 35th Term Reports

2008 INCOME TAX GUIDE

NITTSU SHOJI REPORT. (April 1,2015-March 31,2016)

NITTSU SHOJI REPORT. (April 1, 2005 March 31, 2006)

Targeting New Sources of Growth

Year-end Report 2013/14

Content of the Financial Documents, Etc. Pertaining to the 15th Fiscal Year of Circle K Sunkus Co., Ltd. FamilyMart Co., Ltd.

PMDA update on GMP. QRM related to recall

Explanation of Surveys

ASEAN Investment Flash Japan March 2015

Great Hanshin Earthquake -

Providing fixed-rate housing loans through collaboration with private financial institutions

SECURITIES REPORT. (Report under Section 1, Article 24 of the Securities and Exchange Law)

Year-end Report 2016/17

Flash Report on the Consolidated result for the year ended February 28, 2006

JFC JFC Activities

Grouped multivariate and functional time series forecasting: an application to annuity pricing

Ⅱ Explanation of Terms

Insurance: Limiting the Impact of Natural Catastrophes on the Balance Sheet. Dr. Oliver Kübler Dr. Matthias Schaub

News Release Survey on Privately Placed Real Estate Funds in Japan July 2012 Results

Analysis of the Macroeconomic Impact of the Tohoku-Pacific Ocean Earthquake

Area-focused supplement

National Institute of Population and Social Security Research

Interactions between Regional Public and Private Investment: Evidence from Japanese Prefectures

Fiscal Status of Kobe City. October 2017

Transcription:

Japan experiences of evaluating insurance effectiveness: The role of governments Teruo Saito Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Risk Management Inc. 1

Contents 1 Earthquake insurance and Great East Japan Earthquake 2 The risk of Water-related disasters 3 Development of new insurance products 2

Responsibility of the government of Japan Legal responsibility of the government is stipulated by the Basic Act for National Resilience -- the government has the responsibility to establish and implement measures concerning National Resilience (Article 3) Insurance plays an important role for recovery from disaster and developing resilience. -- It provides disaster victims with financial support and assistance to recover their lives. The government should closely cooperate with insurance industry for fulfilling its responsibility. 3

The effectiveness of the earthquake insurance was tried In March 2011, the Great East Japan Earthquake struck, centered on the Tohoku district, brought enormous, widespread damage. - a total of 19,009 people dead or missing - 383,246 buildings completely or partially destroyed The effectiveness of the earthquake insurance was severely tried by the Earthquake. The government and insurance industry strived for fulfilling their responsibility, and got over the test. 4

The insurance was appreciated by victims as being effective During one year from the earthquake, victims could receive payment on 772,403 claims, totaling 1,241 billion yen (12 billion US$) During two chaotic months, insurance industry managed to pay about 60 percent of total claims. One year later, it reached 99 percent. Insurance industry completed its responsibility without significant financial impairment. In 2012, a project team of the Ministry of Finance reviewed effectiveness of insurance, in conclusion valued it highly. The government decided on the continuance of the system. 5

Number Change of the total number and amount of insurance claims paid out due to the Great East Japan Earthquake 1 year later Billion yen 1,241 1,200 2 months later Number 1,000 800 600 400 200 4/15 14 20 27 5/6 12 18 26 6/2 9 15 21 29 7/7 14 20 28 8/3 17 31 9/14 2810/12 28 11/9 24 12/14 28 2/1 3/1 12 4/2 0 Total amount money of insurance claims paid Total number of insurance claims paid General Insurance Association of Japan 6

Outline of the earthquake insurance The earthquake insurance is an insurance exclusively for earthquake disasters. It indemnifies against damage caused by fire, destruction, burying or washing away, resulting from an earthquake or volcanic eruption or from a tsunami following either of these events. Fire insurance does not indemnify against damage caused by fire resulting from an earthquake or fire damage that spreads because of an earthquake. The earthquake insurance is attached to fire insurance. The earthquake insurance is established with the government reinsurance underwriting. 7

Key point 1 government s role as a reinsurer The earthquake insurance system stipulates Liability sharing of insurance companies and the government, and Maximum Payment Limit (MPL) Based on liability sharing, the government shared the payment of 1.2 trillion yen with insurance industry and it lightened the burden imposed on insurance industry. Due to a revision reflecting a rapid decrease in insurance industry s reserve after the earthquake, liability share of the government increased. And Maximum Payment Limit also increased to 7 trillion yen due to increase in the earthquake risk. 8

Liability sharing of insurance companies and Japanese government Former liability sharing and MPL (applied to the Great East Japan Earthquake) Total payment 1,241 billion yen 5,500 billion yen 115 billion yen 1,925 billion yen (Maximum Payment Limit) 50% Liability of Government 4,301 billion yen 95% Liability of insurance companies 1,198 billion yen 50% 5% Current liability sharing and MPL (as of April 2014) 100 billion yen 362 billion yen 7,000 billion yen Liability of insurance companies 261.4 billion yen Liability of Government 6,738 billion yen General Insurance Association of Japan General Insurance Rating Organization of Japan About 99.5% About 0.5% 9

Key point 2 introduction of new approaches for payment of claims For proper and prompt payment of insurance claims, insurance industry introduced many new approaches under the leadership of the General Insurance Association of Japan (GIAJ). Insurance companies deployed many staffs needed to respond to damage of the earthquake. Sompo Japan set up 12 local headquarters in nationwide, and dispatched more than 3,000 staffs to the affected areas. The governments supported insurance industry s efforts. For instance, the government approved a car for use of insurance assessment as emergency vehicle, which enabled to pass Tohoku expressway in chaotic times when general vehicle couldn't pass there. 10

Example of new approaches Designation of the total loss areas, using 23,000 aerial and satellite photographs, which enabled to assess the degree of damage without building-by-building damage investigation. Introduction of written investigations based on self-submitted reports by policyholders such as the exclusion zone related to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Consulting system for answering policyholder s inquiries, in cases that it was not clear which company had underwritten, for reasons including loss of the insurance policy due to the tsunami or the death of the policyholder. 11

Key point 3 affordable premiums Earthquake insurance premium has been kept at a level that as many people as possible can afford. For that purpose, the scope of indemnity is limited and the rates are established in eight risk classes derived from the four insurance zones (location) and the two types of building structures. Penetration of the earthquake insurance has been improving due to the government and industry s promotion activities and rising consumer awareness of earthquake risk. In 2012, 56.5 % of fire insurance policyholders have earthquake insurance policy cover. The governments aims at 61.6% in 2014. Limiting the scope of indemnity The policyholder is required to set the amount insured under earthquake insurance within a range of 30-50% of the insured amount of fire insurance. However, the amount insured is limited to a maximum of 50 million yen for a building and 10 million yen for personal property. 12

Basic premium rates Nonwooden Wooden Prefecture Zone 4 Zone1 17 prefectur es Zone2 15peifect ures Zone3 6prefect ures 0.50yen 1.00yen Iwate, Akita, Yamagata, Fukushima, Tochigi, Gunma, Toyama, Ishikawa, Fukui, Tottori, Shimane, Yamaguchi, Fukuoka, Saga, Nagasaki, Kumamoto, Kagoshima 0.65yen 1.27yen Hokkaido, Aomori, Miyagi, Niigata, Nagano, Gifu, Shiga, Kyoto, Hyogo, Nara, Okayama, Hiroshima, Oita, Miyazaki, Okinawa 1.o5yen 1.88yen Ibaraki, Saitama, Yamanashi, Osaka, Kagawa, Ehime Zone 3 Zone 2 Zone 1 Zone4 9prefect ures 1.69yen 3.13yen Chiba, Tokyo, Kanagawa, Shizuoka, Aichi, Mie, Wakayama, Tokushima, Kochi (As of April 2014) Per one year insurance period and \1,000 of amount thousand insured General Insurance Rating Organization of Japan 13

Coverage of the earthquake insurance The ratio of households with earthquake insurance and the ratio of fire insurance policyholders with earthquake insurance coverage (%) The number of earthquake insurance policies The number of earthquake insurance policies The ratio of households with earthquake insurance to all households The ratio of fire insurance policyholders with earthquake insurance coverage to all fire insurance policyholders General Insurance Association of Japan 14

A challenge to the risk of hydrometeorological disasters In Japan, there is an increasing tendency of torrential rainfall as a long-term trend. It will become stronger due to the impact of climate change. General insurance capacity may be influenced by the increase of the risks of water-related disasters in the future. Change of annual number of occurrences of torrential rainfall of 80mm or more in one hour Annual number of occurrences per level of hourly rainfall (per 1,000 measurement points) year Japan Meteorological Agency 15

Research for evaluation of future flood risk with Kyoto University In 2010, Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Risk Management Inc. launched a research project on an estimate of future flood risk together with Disaster Prevention Research Institute of Kyoto University. The joint team developed flood simulation models, for the Kinki metropolitan area ( Yodo River basin) in 2011, for the Tokyo (Tone River Basin) and Chukyo metropolitan areas (Kiso River Basin) in 2012. Kyoto Shiga The team is studying on quantifying the flood risk Hyogo using these models taking account of the impact of climate change. Osaka Nara Mie Yodo river basin (8,240km2), 16

Development of new insurance products for vulnerable people Insurance can play also an important role to contribute to mitigating the impact of climate change for vulnerable people in developing countries. But existing insurance products in developed country, just as it is, may not be suitable for them. Insurance companies have responsibility to develop new insurance products. It necessitates partner s participation. Sompo Japan has been endeavoring to develop insurance products that will contribute to mitigating damage from climate change in cooperation with partners. 17

Provision of weather index insurance in northeast Thailand From 2007, Sompo Japan began researching risk financing methods to address climate change together with the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) In 2010, Sompo Japan Insurance Thailand started providing weather index insurance in northeast Thailand through the Thai Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC), to farmers who had contracted BAAC s loans. In 2012, sale of the product has expanded to cover nine provinces in northeast Thailand (one province in 2010, five provinces in 2011). NKSj Holdings, CSR Communication Report 2013 18

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance Pilot Program For mitigating the impact of climate change on small island countries, regional risk pooling such as CCRIF has occupied the attention. In 2013, the World Bank and five pacific countries launched the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance Pilot Program. In 2014, Cook Island joined the program. Sompo Japan, joined the program as a private insurance company when it was established in 2013. NKSj Holdings, CSR Communication Report 2013 19