Avon. Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100- Year Flood

Similar documents
Simsbury. Challenges Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 356

Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 90

Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

East Hartford. Challenges

Existing Strategies. Challenges

Flood Insurance THE TOPIC OCTOBER 2012

Town of Montrose Annex

9.10 HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

9.24 WEISENBERG TOWNSHIP

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.2 ALBURTIS BOROUGH. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for Alburtis Borough. A. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

5.0 Town of Berlin Annex

Emergency Management. December 16, 2010

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

Mitigation Action Plan Alamance County

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

9.8 FOUNTAIN HILL BOROUGH

9.36 TOWN OF VAN BUREN

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

Garfield County NHMP:

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.46 NAZARETH BOROUGH

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

History of Floodplain Management in Ascension Parish

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For Local Governments

10/23/2014. Presented by: Erike Young, MPPA, CSP, ARM-E. Public Sector Disaster Planning/Emergency Response

Flood Vulnerability Assessment for Critical Facilities. Molly Woloszyn Lisa Graff, GISP, CFM

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

Survey of Hazus-MH: FEMA s Tool for Natural Hazard Loss Estimation

Biggert-Waters The Changing Script

Third Appropriation Funding Recommendation

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Planning in Water s Way: Flood Resilient Economic Development Strategy for the I-86 Innovation Corridor

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT

ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

City of Ocean City Permit and Application Process Quality Improvement

Stoddard County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan-Five Year Update SECTION 3

Overview of HAZUS for Earthquake Loss Estimation. September 6, 2012

9.35 VILLAGE OF TULLY

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

Emergency Preparedness. Emergency Preparedness & the Senior Housing Provider. The Speakers LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Greater Greenburgh Planning Area Planning Process

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

T-318. Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Section 2. Introduction and Purpose of the LMS

SECTION 6 - RANGE OF ALTERNATIVE MITIGATION ACTIONS CONSIDERED

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Integrating Hazard Mitigation and Comprehensive Planning Workshop

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

City of Sea Isle City Department of Construction and Zoning Physical Location: 4501 Park Road (rear entrance)

According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the Town was 4,024.

9.24 TOWNSHIP OF WALPACK

Proactive Location Identification for Emergency Response and 911 Purposes

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

National Institute of Building Sciences

Lake County Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Plan Lake County Hazard Mitigation Committee

Hazard Mitigation Planning

Karlstad, Sweden. Local progress report on the implementation of the 10 Essentials for Making Cities Resilient ( )

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

PEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION (ESF) 14 LONG-TERM RECOVERY

Pinellas County Local Mitigation Strategy Progress Report

Hazus: Estimated Damage and Economic Losses. South Carolina United States

Dunklin County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan-Five Year Update SECTION 3

Public Meeting 28 November Presented by: Deepa Srinivasan, Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Dr. Michael Scott, ESRGC, Salisbury University

Mitigation Works. 0 With its devastating combination of water, mud, and sewage, the damages caused by flooding are particularly wrenching.

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

APPENDIX H TOWN OF FARMVILLE. Hazard Rankings. Status of Mitigation Actions. Building Permit Data. Future Land Use Map. Critical Facilities Map

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Dade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan

Sussex County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Plan Executive Summary

Priority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION

APPENDIX D PLANNING PROCESS DOCUMENTATION

Rainy Days and Hot Summer Nights: Planning for Hazards in a Changing Climate

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Transcription:

Avon Avon is a suburban town in north-central Connecticut with a population of about 18,000. It has an average elevation of about 350 ft. The Town encompasses 23.5 square miles, lying entirely within the Farmington River watershed. The Farmington River forms the Town s western border then makes a u- turn in neighboring Farmington, to flow south to north in the eastern section of Avon. Major tributaries that course through Town include Big, Chidsey, Cider, Hawley, Nod, Roaring, Thompson, and Wiggin Brooks. Major state routes that pass through Avon include Routes 10 and 44. Insurance, printing, concrete products, poultry processing, reflective tapes, fiber optics and medical facilities are the major industries in Avon. Challenges Flooding and wintery weather can easily disrupt the transportation network in Avon, given the vast floodplain area and the steep terrain on the eastern edge of Town. Town staff also lack some basic resources to target mitigation and/or response measures, e.g. maps of structures in the floodplain and maps of Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) infrastructure that can be shared among public safety, planning, engineering and public works departments; however efforts have been made over the past five years to improve the Town s mapping capabilities. Flooding is a concern for the Town of Avon and it has taken steps to reduce its vulnerability. No new development or changes in land use have been approved recently in the floodplain. Addressing repetitive flood claims is another challenge for the Town of Avon and its property owners. Among the property owners in Avon with flood insurance, three properties have filed multiple claims amounting to total payments of $45,197. These repetitive flood claims make up most of the total flood loss claims filed in Avon. Overall, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) has paid 15 claims in Avon totaling over $50,000 to-date. CRCOG used FEMA s Hazus-MH model to analyze the risks that the Town of Avon might face from a major flood. The model estimates that economic losses to the town including residential and commercial damage and business interruptions due to a flood having a 1% chance of occurring any given year (the 100-year flood) would be nearly $180 million. The impacts of such a flood are summarized below: Estimated Damages from 100- Year Flood Households Displaced 312 People Needing Shelter 673 Buildings at Least Moderately Damaged 114 Total Estimated Economic Losses $179,770,000 Total Residential Building & Content Losses $45,310,000 Total Commercial, Industrial & Other Building & Content Losses $133,460,000 Total Business Interruption Losses $970,000 Losses from strong hurricanes would also be significant. The model estimates that economic losses to the town including residential and commercial damage and business interruptions due to a Category 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 201

3 hurricane such as the 1938 Hurricane would be nearly $70 million. The impacts of such a storm are summarized below: Estimated Damages from a 1938 Strength Hurricane Households Displaced 19 People Needing Shelter 2 Buildings at Least Moderately Damaged 372 Buildings Completely Damaged 15 Total Estimated Economic Losses $69,000,000 Total Residential Building Losses $51,100,000 Total Commercial, Industrial & Other Building Losses $11,200,000 Total Business Interruption Losses $6,700,000 Total Debris Generated 30,082 tons Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 220 According to information from the Connecticut Department of Emergency Management and Homeland Security, the three federally declared natural disasters of 2011 resulted in total expenses to the municipality of nearly $2.6 million. These expenses include debris and snow removal, emergency protective measures and repairs to damaged infrastructure and buildings but do not include damages experienced by private citizens and businesses. Storm Alfred, by far, wreaked the most havoc on the town. 2011 Disasters Damage Amounts Eligible for 75% Reimbursement Under FEMA Public Assistance Program 100% of Amount Eligible for 75% Reimbursement Total Damages Eligible DR-4023-CT DR-4046-CT DR-1958-CT for Public Assistance Applicant Irene Severe Weather 2011 Snow Due to 2011 Disasters August 2011 Oct 2011 Alfred) Town of Avon $60,686.78 $148,578.36 $2,388,663.29 $2,597,928.43 Goals, Objectives and Strategies GOAL: REDUCE THE LOSS OF LIFE AND PROPERTY AND CONSEQUENCES AS A RESULT OF NATURAL DISASTERS Objective 1: Have a plan for emergency responders to respond to high winds. 1.1 Develop and maintain agreements with local contractors for emergency tree and debris removal, to quickly restore access throughout town, for emergency response. Lead: Public Works No agreement has been made. Service purchase approval process has been developed. 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 202

Timeframe: 2014 2019 Objective 2: Improve emergency responders knowledge of emergency action plans. 2.1 Continue to participate in regional National Incident Management System (NIMS) and other emergency response trainings. Lead: Police and Fire Staff has updates as required; new staff continues to train. Potential Funding Source: FEMA funding through CRCOG and General funds. Timeframe: Periodically, as available during the 2014 2019 2.2 Inform municipal staff of revisions to emergency response action plan. All departments have updated their plan annexes and have access to the EOP. The plan is routinely updated due to staff changes and new procedures. Timeframe: 2014 2019 Objective 3: Ensure equipment is maintained in proper operative condition. 3.1 Fully implement new fleet management system. Lead: Public Works Completed. System is operating and managed by Public Works. 3.2 Investigate CRCOG services sharing initiative, and potential for shared equipment, such as a chipper. Lead: Public Works, Administration Completed. Equipment has been purchased for regional use, Skid steer, and mini-excavator. 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 203

GOAL: REDUCE THE LOSS OF LIFE AND PROPERTY DURING ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS Objective 1: Monitor weather conditions and relocate personnel in key locations to lower response times. 1.1 Continue with current practices of relocating personnel to the east side of the Farmington River as needed. Lead: Fire and Police This is an established practice which is implemented on an as needed basis. The Town has also developed an automatic response plan with UCONN Fire Department. Potential Funding Source: Funds are not required; UCONN response is provided through mutual aid.. 1.2 Use Connecticut Department of Transportation highway garage as staging area for local personnel. Lead: Fire and Police This action was previously stated as Talk to CT Department of Transportation about using State highway garage as staging area for local personnel. This action was accomplished. Units can be staged if necessary. The Town will continue to maintain a working relationship with ConnDOT and will use the garage for staging on an as needed basis throughout the 2014-2019 plan period. Potential Funding Source: Not required (State and Local staff will implement.) 1.3 Provide satellite televisions for Public Works and Fire Departments to monitor information when power and cable are out. Lead: Fire, Public Works Completed. Police and Fire Departments have satellite TV. Objective 2: Ensure adequate staffing and provide staff with necessary tools to respond to event. 2.1 Upgrade more staff members to wireless communication systems. 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 204

Priority: Medium Completed. All EOC staff have smart phones; many have laptops w/wifi. 2.2 Implement web-based GIS, and provide access to sensitive information for emergency responders., Planning Complete. We have a web based program known as Community Explorer Online (CEO) available to all responders. Continual and ongoing updates to the system will be made as plan program changes. 2.3 Map structures located in floodplains, and develop a targeted Reverse-911 list for those property owners. Lead: Engineering GIS staff continues to develop data. Continual development and updates to the system will be made throughout the 2014 2019 planning period. 2.4 Acquire a portable generator and enable hook-ups at shelters and emergency response facilities. Completed. All public safety facilities have backup generators; however, two communication sites have been identified as needing generators. Main shelter site is equipped with backup power. Potential Funding Source: General fund, grants Timeframe: Project is expected to be initiated between 2014 and 2018. Completion will follow receipt of funding - estimated to be 2015-2019. Objective 3: Coordinate with all local, state and federal agencies and authorities. 3.1 Map, or obtain mapping of, MDC infrastructure in town. Lead: Planning This is an established practice. Engineering is attempting to get data from MDC. Continual development and updates to the system will be made throughout the 2014 2019 planning period. 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 205

3.2 Meet with MDC staff to discuss coordinated emergency response planning. Participated in MDC yearly drills; Engineering is attempting to get data from MDC. Will continue to maintain a working relationship with MDC and will participate in future drills throughout the 2014 2019 planning period. 3.3 Coordinate with other agencies on an as needed basis. This is an established practice. Timeframe: 2014 2019 GOAL: REDUCE THE LOSS OF LIFE AND PROPERTY DURING SIGNIFICANT FLOODING EVENTS Objective 1: Continue to enforce the towns of Avon's flood plain regulations. 1.1 Continue with current development review and enforcement practices. Lead: Planning, Engineering Regulations require structures be built above the 500 flood zone. Proposed development is routinely evaluated for conformance with floodplain regulations during the development review process. This practice will continue throughout the 2014-2019 plan period. Note: the following strategy was in the 2008 Plan but will not be identified as a separate action in the 2014-2019 Update. 1.2 Ensure that an equal amount of compensation for any project that negatively affects flood flows. Lead: Planning, Engineering 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 206

Proposed development in the floodplain is required to be constructed in accordance with the Town s floodplain regulations, including compensatory storage. Implementation of this strategy is covered within the strategic action above (1.1 Continue with current practices). For this reason, the Town has opted not to include this as a separate strategic action for the update. Objective 2: Educate public in regards to town's emergency plan and emergency shelter. 2.1 Use municipal website and town newsletter to periodically update residents. The Town has undertaken a number of activities over the past five years to implement this strategic action. For example, relevant information is routinely posted on the town web site; pertinent articles have been written for the town newsletter and FEMA STEP training has been provided for all 5 th grade students., DEMHS funds : Periodic informational updates; annual STEP training 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 207

Map 12: Avon Population Density, Dams and Flood Zones 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 208

Map 13: Avon Flood Plains, Repetitive Loss Areas, Dams and Important Facilities 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 209