How Solar-Plus-Storage Can Re-Align Customer and Utility Values. Presented by Brock Mosovsky and Cory Welch

Similar documents
Power Accountants Association Annual Meeting Potential Impacts from Oct 2015 Rate Change

Solar PV where the sun doesn t shine: Estimating the economic impacts of support schemes for residential PV with detailed net demand profiling

Residential Rate OIR Rate Design and Bill Impact Analysis Model

Schedule 19 POWER PURCHASES FROM COGENERATION AND SMALL POWER PRODUCTION QUALIFYING FACILITIES

The Sharing Economy for the Smart Grid

OPTIONAL DOMESTIC TIME-OF-USE CRITICAL PEAK PRICE + DAILY DEMAND PRICING

MAR 2017 JAN 2017 DEC 2016 FEB 2017 HOEP*

Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E Cancelling Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E. ELECTRIC SCHEDULE ET Sheet 1 MOBILEHOME PARK SERVICE

Community Solar Rate Rider: Schedule No February 13, 2018

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

SCHEDULE TOU-M Sheet 1 T

BC HYDRO S RATE DESIGN APPLICATION FARM AND IRRIGATION CUSTOMER ISSUES. Presentation to the BC Cranberry Marketing Commission (BCCMC) June 15, 2015

Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E Cancelling Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E. ELECTRIC SCHEDULE A-1 Sheet 1 SMALL GENERAL SERVICE

Summary of Value of Distributed Energy Resources Phase 1 Order

SCHEDULE DR-SES Sheet 1

Technical Summary of Proposals Regarding Net Metering in New York

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY BPU NJ

Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E Cancelling Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E

PAUL CHERNICK ELLEN HAWES

Integrating Wholesale and Retail DR Programs: National Grid s New C&I DR Offering

SCHEDULE EECC-TOU-A-P Sheet 1

Jefferson County PUD. Rate Hearing November 10, 2016

PV Plant s Transformer Evaluation Tool: Guide Memo

Actual neighborhood of Sunrun customer homes

Rate W: Applies to customers who were on Rate W as of May 1, A-6: Applies to customers who were on A-6 as of May 1, 2006.

MHC s bold idea on solar premium feed-in tariff reform gaining traction in Queensland

Development of the Renewable Dispatchable Generation Model. Overview of SEPA & ScottMadden Engagement

SECOND QUARTER 2017 RESULTS. August 3, 2017

NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a EVERSOURCE ENERGY SUMMARY OF ELECTRIC SERVICE DELIVERY RATES. M.D.P.U. No E Page 1 of 10

For the Efficiency Maine Trust October 15, 2009 Eric Belliveau, Optimal Energy Inc.

Economics of Distributed Resources

EPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc. ( EEA GPI ) Price Schedule Applicable to Default Supply Customers within the City of Edmonton

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a EVERSOURCE ENERGY SUMMARY OF ELECTRIC SERVICE DELIVERY RATES. M.D.P.U. No C Page 1 of 10

The Energiesprong concept is based on the assumption that the capital investment required to deliver net-zero-energy refurbishments is covered by:

Management Comments. February 12, 2015

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E Cancelling Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E

ELECTRIC SCHEDULE A-10 Sheet 1 MEDIUM GENERAL DEMAND-METERED SERVICE

Saving Money On Electricity Bills With Solar

Cost of Service Study and Recommended Rate Design

Cooperative Electric Rates 2013 Power System Engineering, Inc.

FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR 2017 RESULTS. February 23, 2018

Comverge Qualifications

Austin Energy Load Cooperative Program Enrollment Form

5 Minute Settlements. Ray Fernandez Manager, Market Settlements Development Market Settlements Subcommittee November 10,

Welcome. Welcome to the VDER Phase I Solar Installer Roundtable Info Session April 26, 2017

EPCOR Energy Alberta Inc. ( EEAI ) Price Schedule Applicable to Default Supply Customers within the City of Edmonton

Dynamic Pricing Proposals of Southern California Edison Company in Compliance with D

Load and Billing Impact Findings from California Residential Opt-in TOU Pilots

microfit RULES Version 4.1 January 1, 2017

Superseding Revised Sheet No. 65 REVISED SHEET NO. 65 Effective June 20, 2008 Effective March 1, 2011 RIDER M. Off-Peak and Curtailable Service

AMEU Convention Tuesday 28 SEPTEMBER 2010 Stellenbosch

The Economics and Financing of Distributed Generation Investment. Budapest, Hungary November 17, 2016

SURPLUS ENERGY PROGRAM TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Schedule NEM-V-ST Sheet 1 VIRTUAL NET METERING FOR MULTI-TENANT AND MULTI-METER PROPERTIES SUCCESSOR TARIFF

Please see Sunrun s 2018 Impact Report, available on the company s Investor Relations website, for more information, including information on the

Brooklyn Queens Demand Management Demand Response Forum

It Don t Mean a Thing Without Good Marketing!! Marketing Solar for Agricultural Uses

OPTIONAL LARGE GENERAL SERVICE - HIGH OFF-PEAK USE

ROCKLAND ELECTRIC COMPANY PROPOSAL FOR BASIC GENERATION SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO BE PROCURED EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2016

Brooklyn Queens Demand Management Demand Response Webinar

Large Commercial Rate Simplification

by the QF in excess of the customer's total load, and

2019 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Public Input Meeting January 24, 2019

TNUoS Tariffs in 10 minutes March 2018

SCHEDULE FIT TIER 1 AND TIER 2

THE NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY RENEWABLE ENERGY GROWTH PROGRAM FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS

2015 Load Impact Evaluation of Pacific Gas and Electric Company s Residential Time-Based Pricing Programs: Ex-Post and Ex-Ante Report.

RATE RTPD REAL TIME PRICING - DAY AHEAD (RESTRICTED)

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

Review of LADWP Feed-In-Tariff Proposal for City Council

Approved Prices and Structures for Electricity Pricing Pilots Board File No.: EB

NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a EVERSOURCE ENERGY SUMMARY OF ELECTRIC SERVICE DELIVERY RATES. M.D.P.U. No C Page 1 of 9

KEY FINDINGS AND RESOURCE STRATEGY

Dated: October 24, 2016 BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

Value of DER. Con Edison and Orange & Rockland. Developer Workshop

$in000's Deficiency Impact

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Electric Rate Schedule GS-2 General Service - Demand

BUSINESS INCENTIVE PROGRAM APPLICATION

Long Run Marginal Cost (LRMC)

WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

The following words and terms shall have the following meanings when used in this Tariff:

Interconnection Application and Compliance Form For Photovoltaic Systems Up to 2 MW

Schedule NEM-V Sheet 1 VIRTUAL NET ENERGY METERING FOR MULTI-TENANT AND MULTI-METER PROPERTIES

May 3, Dear Ms. Bordelon:

Actual neighborhood of Sunrun customer homes

20 ANNU 17 AL REPORT

Value of Solar Tariff

An Assessment of Incentives for Solar Power in Washington State. Prepared by: Center for Economic and Business Research Western Washington University

Creating a planet run by the sun

Transcription:

How Solar-Plus-Storage Can Re-Align Customer and Utility Values Presented by Brock Mosovsky and Cory Welch

Customer Perspective Mid-day solar gen has significant value Image Source: https://www.caiso.com/documents/flexibleresourceshelprenewables_fastfacts.pdf

Utility Perspective Mid-day solar gen presents significant risk Image Source: https://www.caiso.com/documents/flexibleresourceshelprenewables_fastfacts.pdf

How Can Residential Solar + Storage Systems Help? Shift Energy Provide dispatchable solar gen Open additional value streams BUT Residential customers will install storage systems only if there is value in doing so!

Questions Explored in this Talk What does optimal solar + storage system operation look like? How does the value of storage depend on: Differences between time-of-use rates? Demand charges? Export compensation rates? Under what conditions are residential solar + storage systems cost-effective?

4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 Load (kw) Solar PV Only Significant mid-day over-generation 3.5 3 Mon Tues Wed Thurs 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Hour of Day Raw Cust Dmd Solar Gen Image Source: Navigant Analysis

4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 Load (kw) Solar PV Only Net load goes negative: export to grid 3.5 3 Mon Tues Wed Thurs 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Hour of Day Raw Cust Dmd Solar Gen Net Cust Dmd Image Source: Navigant Analysis

4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 Load (kw) Solar PV + Storage Storage charges during over-generation 3.5 3 Mon Tues Wed Thurs 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Hour of Day Raw Cust Dmd Solar Gen Storage Charge Image Source: Navigant Analysis

4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 2 Load (kw) Solar PV + Storage, Demand Charge Storage discharges to reduce peak demand 3.5 3 Mon Tues Wed Thurs 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Hour of Day Raw Cust Dmd Solar Gen Storage Charge Net Cust Dmd Image Source: Navigant Analysis

Load (kw) Solar PV + Storage, Time-of-Use Rate 3.5 3 2.5 Storage reduces demand during the time-ofuse peak period On Peak 2 1.5 1 0.5 0-0.5 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 1 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 2 22:00 Hour of Day Raw Cust Dmd Solar Gen Storage Charge Net Cust Dmd Export to Grid Image Source: Navigant Analysis

Load (kw) Solar PV + Storage, Time-of-Use Rate 3.5 3 2.5 Peak demand is only marginally reduced, since there is no demand charge. On Peak 2 1.5 1 0.5 0-0.5 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 1 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 2 22:00 Hour of Day Raw Cust Dmd Solar Gen Storage Charge Net Cust Dmd Export to Grid Image Source: Navigant Analysis

What/Where is the Value? Valuation assumptions: Full system cost incurred: no incentives Revenue neutrality against raw customer load A customer with no solar or storage should have the same annual bill under each TOU and demand charge scenario. 5.5 kw solar system, 3.3 kw/7kwh battery 20 year lifetime, replace battery at year 10

Electricity Rate Scenarios Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) TOU Peak Rate Multipliers 1 (Peak / Off-Peak) Demand Charge 2 ($/kw-month) Export Comp. Rate (% of Retail) $0.10 1 $0 100% $0.20 1.25 $2 60% $0.40 2.5 $10 20% 5 $20 1 Avg. On-peak Illinois periods: weekdays residential only, 10 AM-8 retail PM in summer, rate 7 AM-11 in 2014 AM and was 5 PM-9 PM $0.119 in winter 2 Monthly demand charge assessed based on highest hourly demand in each month Source: EIA Form 861 Annual Electric Power Industry Report

Flat Rate, Net Metering Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) TOU Peak Rate Multipliers 1 (Peak / Off-Peak) Demand Charge 2 ($/kw-month) Export Comp. Rate (% of Retail) $0.10 1 $0 100% $0.20 1.25 $2 60% $0.40 2.5 $10 20% 5 $20 1 On-peak periods: weekdays only, 10 AM-8 PM in summer, 7 AM-11 AM and 5 PM-9 PM in winter 2 Monthly demand charge assessed based on highest hourly demand in each month

Annual System Value ($) Flat Rate, Net Metering PV Only and PV+Storage have equal value $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) PV Only PV+Storage

Flat Rate, Net Metering Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) TOU Peak Rate Multipliers 1 (Peak / Off-Peak) Demand Charge 2 ($/kw-month) Export Comp. Rate (% of Retail) $0.10 1 $0 100% $0.20 1.25 $2 60% $0.40 2.5 $10 20% 5 $20 1 On-peak periods: weekdays only, 10 AM-8 PM in summer, 7 AM-11 AM and 5 PM-9 PM in winter 2 Monthly demand charge assessed based on highest hourly demand in each month

Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) TOU Peak Rate Multipliers 1 (Peak / Off-Peak) Demand Charge 2 ($/kw-month) Export Comp. Rate (% of Retail) $0.10 1 $0 100% $0.20 1.25 $2 60% $0.40 2.5 $10 20% 5 $20 1 On-peak periods: weekdays only, 10 AM-8 PM in summer, 7 AM-11 AM and 5 PM-9 PM in winter 2 Monthly demand charge assessed based on highest hourly demand in each month

Annual System Value ($) Flat Rate, Net Metering $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) PV Only PV+Storage

Annual System Value ($) Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp Value falls for both systems, but much more so for PV Only $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) PV Only PV+Storage

Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) TOU Peak Rate Multipliers 1 (Peak / Off-Peak) Demand Charge 2 ($/kw-month) Export Comp. Rate (% of Retail) $0.10 1 $0 100% $0.20 1.25 $2 60% $0.40 2.5 $10 20% 5 $20 1 On-peak periods: weekdays only, 10 AM-8 PM in summer, 7 AM-11 AM and 5 PM-9 PM in winter 2 Monthly demand charge assessed based on highest hourly demand in each month

Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp, $10/kW Demand Chg Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) TOU Peak Rate Multipliers 1 (Peak / Off-Peak) Demand Charge 2 ($/kw-month) Export Comp. Rate (% of Retail) $0.10 1 $0 100% $0.20 1.25 $2 60% $0.40 2.5 $10 20% 5 $20 1 On-peak periods: weekdays only, 10 AM-8 PM in summer, 7 AM-11 AM and 5 PM-9 PM in winter 2 Monthly demand charge assessed based on highest hourly demand in each month

Annual System Value ($) Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) PV Only PV+Storage

Annual System Value ($) Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp, $10/kW Demand Chg PV+Storage value increases, PV Only value decreases $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) PV Only PV+Storage

Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp, $10/kW Demand Chg Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) TOU Peak Rate Multipliers 1 (Peak / Off-Peak) Demand Charge 2 ($/kw-month) Export Comp. Rate (% of Retail) $0.10 1 $0 100% $0.20 1.25 $2 60% $0.40 2.5 $10 20% 5 $20 1 On-peak periods: weekdays only, 10 AM-8 PM in summer, 7 AM-11 AM and 5 PM-9 PM in winter 2 Monthly demand charge assessed based on highest hourly demand in each month

Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp, $10/kW Demand Chg, 5x TOU Mult Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) TOU Peak Rate Multipliers 1 (Peak / Off-Peak) Demand Charge 2 ($/kw-month) Export Comp. Rate (% of Retail) $0.10 1 $0 100% $0.20 1.25 $2 60% $0.40 2.5 $10 20% 5 $20 1 On-peak periods: weekdays only, 10 AM-8 PM in summer, 7 AM-11 AM and 5 PM-9 PM in winter 2 Monthly demand charge assessed based on highest hourly demand in each month

Annual System Value ($) Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp, $10/kW Demand Chg $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) PV Only PV+Storage

Annual System Value ($) Flat Rate, 20% of Retail Export Comp, $10/kW Demand Chg, 5x TOU Mult Value increases for both systems, but more so for PV+Storage $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 Base Electricity Rate ($/kwh) PV Only PV+Storage

How do System Costs Affect Value for the Customer? Value varies with electricity rates, but costs do not Bill Ratio = Annual Bill With System Annual Bill Without System Bill Ratios less than one are cost-effective Bill with system includes loan payments and O&M Financing at 6% interest, $0 down payment

A Cost-Effective Scenario 2016 solar PV and battery storage costs $0.40/kWh energy rate (e.g., Hawaii) Export compensation at 20% of retail

Bill Ratio (Lower is More Cost Effective) A Cost-Effective Scenario 1.00 PV+Storage more cost effective than PV Only at high TOU peak rate multipliers 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 TOU Peak Rate Multiplier PV Only PV+Storage

Bill Ratio (Lower is More Cost Effective) A Cost-Effective Scenario 50% 2016 Battery Costs 1.00 At lower battery costs, economics improve considerably 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 TOU Peak Rate Multiplier PV Only PV+Storage

Conclusions Solar+storage can be more cost effective than solar alone, given the proper electricity rates. Rate structure components interact in a complex way to prescribe optimal solar+storage system operation. With an understanding of how rate components contribute to system value, utilities can design rates that shape solar+storage dispatch.

Acknowledgements Thanks to: All of you in the audience for participating AESP for hosting a wonderful event Navigant for financial support

Questions? 1 t-e S P ASSOCIATlON OF ENERGY SERVICES PROFESSIONALS