Game Theory. Important Instructions

Similar documents
CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015

M.Phil. Game theory: Problem set II. These problems are designed for discussions in the classes of Week 8 of Michaelmas term. 1

Lecture 6 Dynamic games with imperfect information

Simon Fraser University Spring 2014

Microeconomics I. Undergraduate Programs in Business Administration and Economics

In reality; some cases of prisoner s dilemma end in cooperation. Game Theory Dr. F. Fatemi Page 219

Microeconomic Theory II Spring 2016 Final Exam Solutions

1 Solutions to Homework 4

Prisoner s dilemma with T = 1

Introduction to Game Theory Lecture Note 5: Repeated Games

14.12 Game Theory Midterm II 11/15/ Compute all the subgame perfect equilibria in pure strategies for the following game:

Spring 2017 Final Exam

SI 563 Homework 3 Oct 5, Determine the set of rationalizable strategies for each of the following games. a) X Y X Y Z

(a) (5 points) Suppose p = 1. Calculate all the Nash Equilibria of the game. Do/es the equilibrium/a that you have found maximize social utility?

Game Theory: Additional Exercises

Player 2 L R M H a,a 7,1 5,0 T 0,5 5,3 6,6

Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games

Not 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers

ECE 586BH: Problem Set 5: Problems and Solutions Multistage games, including repeated games, with observed moves

Beliefs and Sequential Rationality

Economics 502 April 3, 2008

Repeated Games. EC202 Lectures IX & X. Francesco Nava. January London School of Economics. Nava (LSE) EC202 Lectures IX & X Jan / 16

Economics 171: Final Exam

ECON402: Practice Final Exam Solutions

Finitely repeated simultaneous move game.

MKTG 555: Marketing Models

Repeated, Stochastic and Bayesian Games

CHAPTER 14: REPEATED PRISONER S DILEMMA

Problem 3 Solutions. l 3 r, 1

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY. Department of Economics. January Written Portion of the Comprehensive Examination for

Eco AS , J. Sandford, spring 2019 March 9, Midterm answers

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 5

preferences of the individual players over these possible outcomes, typically measured by a utility or payoff function.

Microeconomics Comprehensive Exam

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions

CSE 316A: Homework 5

Agenda. Game Theory Matrix Form of a Game Dominant Strategy and Dominated Strategy Nash Equilibrium Game Trees Subgame Perfection

1 R. 2 l r 1 1 l2 r 2

Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

Answer Key: Problem Set 4

CMSC 474, Introduction to Game Theory 16. Behavioral vs. Mixed Strategies

Economics 209A Theory and Application of Non-Cooperative Games (Fall 2013) Repeated games OR 8 and 9, and FT 5

The Nash equilibrium of the stage game is (D, R), giving payoffs (0, 0). Consider the trigger strategies:

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

Extensive form games - contd

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 12

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

An introduction on game theory for wireless networking [1]

Name. Answers Discussion Final Exam, Econ 171, March, 2012

Warm Up Finitely Repeated Games Infinitely Repeated Games Bayesian Games. Repeated Games

Topics in Contract Theory Lecture 1

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma

1. (15 points) P1 P2 P3 P4. GAME THEORY EXAM (with SOLUTIONS) January 2010

Simon Fraser University Fall Econ 302 D200 Final Exam Solution Instructor: Songzi Du Wednesday December 16, 2015, 8:30 11:30 AM

Out of equilibrium beliefs and Refinements of PBE

Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4)

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017

Extensive-Form Games with Imperfect Information

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 2017

1 x i c i if x 1 +x 2 > 0 u i (x 1,x 2 ) = 0 if x 1 +x 2 = 0

IPR Protection in the High-Tech Industries: A Model of Piracy. Thierry Rayna University of Bristol

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. August 2010

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Econ 601 Prof. James Peck Extra Practice Problems Answers (for final)

ECONS 424 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY HANDOUT ON PERFECT BAYESIAN EQUILIBRIUM- III Semi-Separating equilibrium

1 Solutions to Homework 3

Answers to Problem Set 4

Name. FINAL EXAM, Econ 171, March, 2015

Chapter 8. Repeated Games. Strategies and payoffs for games played twice

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 11

Université du Maine Théorie des Jeux Yves Zenou Correction de l examen du 16 décembre 2013 (1 heure 30)

CS 798: Homework Assignment 4 (Game Theory)

Game Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Repeated Games

Microeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.

Sequential Rationality and Weak Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium

Games of Incomplete Information

CMPSCI 240: Reasoning about Uncertainty

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

In Class Exercises. Problem 1

University at Albany, State University of New York Department of Economics Ph.D. Preliminary Examination in Microeconomics, June 20, 2017

ECON/MGEC 333 Game Theory And Strategy Problem Set 9 Solutions. Levent Koçkesen January 6, 2011

Outline for today. Stat155 Game Theory Lecture 13: General-Sum Games. General-sum games. General-sum games. Dominated pure strategies

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 3: Strategic Form Games - Solution Concepts

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2017

Preliminary Notions in Game Theory

Lecture 5 Leadership and Reputation

CMPSCI 240: Reasoning about Uncertainty

Economics 431 Infinitely repeated games

HW Consider the following game:

REPEATED GAMES. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell. Frank Cowell: Repeated Games. Almost essential Game Theory: Dynamic.

Extensive Form Games II

Sequential-move games with Nature s moves.

University of Hong Kong ECON6036 Stephen Chiu. Extensive Games with Perfect Information II. Outline

14.12 Game Theory - Midterm I 10/13/2011

CHAPTER 15 Sequential rationality 1-1

Today. Applications of NE and SPNE Auctions English Auction Second-Price Sealed-Bid Auction First-Price Sealed-Bid Auction

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

ECO303: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory Benjamin Balak, Spring 2008

Transcription:

Prof. Dr. Anke Gerber Game Theory 2. Exam Summer Term 2012 Important Instructions 1. There are 90 points on this 90 minutes exam. 2. You are not allowed to use any material (books, lecture notes etc.). 3. You are not allowed to use a calculator. 4. Please answer the questions only on the paper that is handed out to you. 5. Please write your name on each sheet of paper, number the pages and leave a margin (2.5cm) on each page. 6. Please write legibly and make sure that your answers are coherent and complete. Good Luck! 1

Exam, Game Theory, October 5, 2012 2 Problem 1 (20 Points) Determine all pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibria of the following 2-player strategic game: Player 2 A B A 2, 2 4, 2 Player 1 B 2, 4 0, 0 Give a brief reason why the strategy profiles you determined are indeed Nash equilibria of the game.

Exam, Game Theory, October 5, 2012 3 Problem 2 (34 Points) Two firms compete on the same product market. They can either sell their product at a high price (H) or a low price (L). The firms simultaneously choose their prices. If both firms choose a high price, every firm makes a profit of 9. If both choose a low price, every firm makes a profit of 1. If one firm chooses a high price and the other firm chooses a low price, all consumers buy at the low price firm. In this case, the low price firm makes a profit of 21, while the high price firm makes zero profits. 1. Represent the firms price competition as a strategic game in matrix form. (8 Points) 2. Determine the Nash equilibrium of the game. Give a brief reason for your answer. (4 Points)

Exam, Game Theory, October 5, 2012 4 3. Suppose the firms not only compete once, but every period for infinitely many periods. Both firms discount future profits with the discount factor δ = 1, where r is the riskless interest 1 + r rate. (a) In order to sustain high prices the firms consider playing the grim-trigger strategy in the infinitely repeated game. Give a definition of the grim-trigger strategy, i.e. write down under which conditions a firm chooses a high or low price in a given period of the infinitely repeated game if it plays grim-trigger. Determine the discounted average profit of a firm if both firms play the grim-trigger strategy. (10 Points) (b) Determine the range of values of δ (or r), for which both firms playing grim-trigger is a Nash equilibrium of the infinitely repeated game. (12 Points)

Exam, Game Theory, October 5, 2012 5 Problem 3 (10 Points) Consider the following version of the centipede game: 1 C 2 C 1 C 2 C 1 C 2 C 7, 7 S S S S S S 1, 1 2, 4 3, 3 4, 6 5, 5 6, 8 In this game, player 1 moves first and either stops the game (S) or continues (C), in which case player 2 moves and either stops or continues and so on until the final move of player 2, where both actions, S and C, lead to a terminal node. The first number at a terminal node always denotes the utility payoff for player 1, the second number the utility payoff for player 2. Determine the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game.

Exam, Game Theory, October 5, 2012 6 Problem 4 (26 Points) Consider the following 3-player extensive game with imperfect information: 1 2 L 1 R 1 L 2 R2 3... 2, 1, 3 L 3 R 3 L 3 R 3 0, 0, 2 1, 1, 1 1, 1, 1 3, 2, 2 The first number at a terminal node denotes the utility payoff for player 1, the second number the utility payoff for player 2, and the third number the utility payoff for player 3. The dotted line indicates that player 3 does not observe the action chosen by player 2.

Exam, Game Theory, October 5, 2012 7 1. Determine all pure strategy Nash equilibria of the game. (14 Points) 2. For all pure strategy Nash equilibria determine the belief of player 3 at his information set, so that the Nash equilibrium strategy profile together with the belief of player 3 is a weak perfect Bayesian equilibrium. (12 Points)