COUNTY OF DUKES COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO OMB CIRCULAR A-133 FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

Similar documents
TOWN OF WRENTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY

TOWN OF FOXBOROUGH, MASSACHUSETTS AUDITORS REPORT AS REQUIRED BY OMB CIRCULAR A-133 AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS AND RELATED INFORMATION

TOWN OF BURLINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS REPORTS ON FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

American Sociological Association. OMB Circular A-133 Supplementary Financial Report Year Ended December 31, 2008

MARSHALL ISLANDS NUCLEAR CLAIMS TRIBUNAL (A GOVERNMENT FUND OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS)

Left Hand Water District. Federal Awards Report in Accordance with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133 December 31, 2014

COMMONWEALTH HEALTH INSURANCE CONNECTOR AUTHORITY (A Component Unit of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts)

TOWN OF MANSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS

PHOENIX-MESA GATEWAY AIRPORT AUTHORITY SINGLE AUDIT ACT REPORTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018

San Jacinto River Authority

SHEPHERD PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT Shepherd, Michigan. Federal Awards (Supplementary Information To Financial Statements) June 30, 2009

CITY OF HEALDSBURG Single Audit Report on Federal Award Programs

Fiscal year ended June 30, 2012

LOWELL REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (A Component Unit of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation)

TOWN OF WELLESLEY, MASSACHUSETTS REPORTS ON FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015

MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY. Auditors Reports as Required by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 and Related Information

Greater New Haven Water Pollution Control Authority. Federal Compliance Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA SINGLE AUDIT REPORT AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

NANTUCKET REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (a component Unit of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation)

City of Redwood City Single Audit Reports

SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Laurel, Mississippi

City of Bowling Green, Kentucky. Single Audit Reports Under Uniform Guidance. Year Ended June 30, 2016

NANTUCKET REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (a component Unit of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation)

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AVIATION DEPARTMENT

SOUTHWEST TRANSIT Eden Prairie, Minnesota

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

Incorporated Village of Greenport, New York

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AVIATION DEPARTMENT

City of Trenton, Michigan. Federal Awards Supplemental Information June 30, 2016

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

CITY OF HEALDSBURG. Single Audit Report on Federal Award Programs June 30, 2015

YAP STATE PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000

Single Audit Report June 30, 2014

Independent Auditors Report

Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants. Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas

City of Des Moines, Iowa. Single Audit Compliance Report Year Ended June 30, 2018

MAINE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT NO. 11. Reports Required by Government Auditing Standards and OMB Circular A-133

NONPROFIT TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES, INC. JULY 31, Independent Auditor s Report 1-2

THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORTS. For The Year Ended December 31, 2017

THE TOWN OF HEBRON, CONNECTICUT

REPORT ON FEDERAL AWARDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133

CITY OF SAN FERNANDO. Single Audit Report on Federal Award Programs June 30, 2018

Section III. Reports on Internal Controls and Compliance

MIAMI-DADE AVIATION DEPARTMENT

Part II. Reports on Internal Control and Compliance

Valley Metro Rail, Inc. Single Audit Reporting Package

CAPE COD REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (a component Unit of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation)

City of McKinney, Texas

SOUTHWEST TRANSIT Eden Prairie, Minnesota

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT REPORT. Year Ended December 31, 2010

Single Audit Report June 30, 2013

CITY OF RICHARDSON, TEXAS. Independent Auditors Reports on Federal Awards in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 Report

FLORENCE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.1 SINGLE AUDIT REPORTING PACKAGE FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015

CATHEDRAL OF FAITH REACHING OUT FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 20, 2017

Valley Metro Rail, Inc.

MIAMI DADE COUNTY AVIATION DEPARTMENT

COMPLIANCE SECTION 121

GREATER ATTLEBORO-TAUNTON REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY SINGLE AUDIT REPORT. Year Ended June 30, 2016

RIVERSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 SINGLE AUDIT REPORTING PACKAGE FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Section III. Reports on Internal Controls and Compliance

To the Members of the Board of Education The Winnetka Public Schools District No. 36 Winnetka, Illinois

LOS ANGELES COUNTY CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST-PROPOSITION 10 COMMISSION (a Component Unit of the County of Los Angeles, California)

BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS. OMB Circular A-133 Single Audit Report. Year ended December 31, 2014

Spokane Airport Board

Part II Reports on Internal Control and Compliance

CITY OF NORFOLK, NEBRASKA. Financial Statements and Reports Required by Governmental Auditing Standards and OMB Circular A-133

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL RAILWAY. Independent Auditors Single Audit Reports. Year ended June 30, 2008

SOUTH BUFFALO CHARTER SCHOOL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2010

LINCOLN LAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT NO. 526 SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS. SINGLE AUDIT Year Ended June 30, 2018

MINNESOTA LITERACY COUNCIL, INC. SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORTS. For The Year Ended June 30, 2014

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD, CONNECTICUT

El Paso County Hospital District d/b/a University Medical Center of El Paso

EL DORADO COUNTY FIRE SAFE COUNCIL GOVERNMENT REPORT (OMB CIRCULAR A-133) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010

CHICO URBAN AREA JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY SINGLE AUDIT REPORT (OMB CIRCULAR A-133) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

CITY OF NORFOLK, NEBRASKA. Financial Statements and Reports Required by Governmental Auditing Standards and OMB Circular A-133

Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority. Single Audit Report June 30, 2015

CONNECTICUT AIRPORT AUTHORITY (A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT)

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY, CALIFORNIA SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015

Single Audit. Reports. For the year ended December 31, 2016

CITY OF CLARKSTON, GEORGIA

COMPLIANCE SECTION 127

THE TOWN OF HEBRON, CONNECTICUT. FEDERAL AND STATE FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE REPORTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011

COMPLIANCE SECTION 113

ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY Irvine, California. Single Audit Report on Federal Awards. Year ended June 30, 2010

TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, MAINE. Reports Required by Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance. For the Year Ended June 30, 2018

Center City Public Charter Schools, Inc. OMB Circular A-133 Supplementary Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2015

City of Overland Park, Kansas. Compliance Report Year Ended December 31, 2017

Valley Metro Rail, Inc.

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District Of Oregon

Lapeer Community Schools of Lapeer County. Federal Awards Supplemental Information June 30, 2017

HARRIS COUNTY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND REPORT ON SINGLE AUDIT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018

COMMISSIONERS OF ST. MARY S COUNTY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS WITH REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE

North Carolina Housing Finance Agency

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District Of Oregon

PARK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE REPORTS. Year Ended June 30, 2018

Jefferson County Public Transportation Benefit Area (Jefferson Transit Authority)

CITY OF RIPON CALIFORNIA SINGLE AUDIT REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015

West Village Academy. Federal Awards Supplemental Information June 30, 2017

Transcription:

COUNTY OF DUKES COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO OMB CIRCULAR A-133 FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

COUNTY OF DUKES COUNTY. MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO OMB CIRCULAR A-133 FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 INDEX Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to each Major Program and Internal Control over Compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 3 5 6 7

Malloy, Lynch, Bienvenue, LLP Certified Public Accountants & Advisors 99 Longwater Circle, Suite 200, NOlwell, MA 02061 Telephone (781) 871-5850 Fax (781) 871-5840 9 Baystate Court, Brewster, MA 02631 Telephone (508) 255-2240 Fax (508) 255-2351 Internet: www.mlbcpa.net REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINACIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the Honorable County Commissioners County of Dukes County, Massachusetts We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the County of Dukes County as of and for the year ended June 30, 2009, which collectively comprise the County of Dukes County's basic financial statements and have issued our report thereon dated December 1,2009. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, and the standards applicable to fmancial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the County of Dukes County's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Dukes County's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Dukes County's internal control over financial reporting. A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the County of Dukes County's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the County of Dukes County's financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected by the County of Dukes County's internal control. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected by the County of Dukes County's internal control. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above.

Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the County of Dukes County's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. We noted certain matters that we reported to management ofthe County of Dukes County, in a separate letter dated December 1, 2009. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, County Commissioners, and federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. December I, 2009 2

Malloy, Lynch, Bienvenue, LLP Certified Public Accountants & Advisors 99 Longwater Circle, Suite 200, Norwell, MA 02061 Telephone (781) 871-5850 Fax (781) 871-5840 9 Baystate Court, Brewster, MA 02631 Telephone (508) 255-2240 Fax (508) 255-2351 Internet: www.mlbcpa.net REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 To the Honorable County Commissioners County of Dukes County, Massachusetts Compliance We have audited the compliance of the County of Dukes County with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-J33 Compliance Supplement that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2009. The County of Dukes County's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the responsibility of the County of Dukes County's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion On the County of Dukes County's compliance based on our audit. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-I33, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-I33 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the County of Dukes County's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination on the County of Dukes County's compliance with those requirements. In our opinion, the County of Dukes County complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2009. Internal Control Over Compliance The management of the County of Dukes County is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the County of Dukes County's internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the County of Dukes County's internal control over compliance. A control deficiency in an entity's internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the entity's ability to administer a federal program such that there is more than a remote likelihood that noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of federal program that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected by the entity's internal control. 3

A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented or detected by the entity's internal control. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the County of Dukes County as of and for the year ended June 30, 2009, and have issued our report thereon, dated December I, 2009. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming our opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the County of Dukes County's basic financial statements. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by OMB Circular A-133 and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, County Commissioners, and federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. December 1, 2009 4

COUNTY OF DUKES COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 FEDERAL AGENCY OR FEDERAL GRANTOR/PASS THROUGH CFDA PASS THROUGH GRANTOR/PROGRAM TITLE NUMBER NUMBER FEDERAL EXPENDITURES U.S. Del!artment of Homeland Securib: Transportation Security Administration Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Agreement Program 97.090 HSTS0208HSLR222 Total U.S. Department of Homeland Security $ 151,801 151,801 U.S. Del!artment of Transl!ortation Federal Aviation Administration passed through Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission: Airport Improvement Program 20.106 3-25-0031-30 Install RW 15-33 MIRLS and Remark RW 15-33 20.106 3-25-0031-31 Runway 6-24 Approach Study 20.106 3-25-0031-32 Construct Runway 6-24 Safety Area 20.106 3-25-0031-34 Total U.S. Department of Transportation 599,659 67,772 2,660 134,578 804,669 Total $ 956,470 See accompanying notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. 5

COUNTY OF DUKES COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL A WARDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 1. Scope of Audit The County of Dukes County (the County) is a governmental agency established by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. All operations related to the County's Federal Grant Programs are included in the scope of the OMB Circular A-133 Audit Requirements for audits of state, local governments, and non-profit organizations (the single audit). The U.S. Office of Management and Budget has been designated as the District's oversight agency for the single audit. 2. Period Audited Single audit testing procedures were performed for the County's federal grant transactions during the year ended June 30, 2009. 3. Summary of Significaut Accouuting Policies Accounting policies and financial reporting practices permitted for municipalities in Massachusetts are prescribed by the Uniform Municipal Accounting System (UMAS) promulgated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Revenue. The significant accounting policies followed by the County are as follows: (a) Basis ofpreseutatiou The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant transactions of the County and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-I33, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. 6

COUNTY OF DUKES COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS JUNE 30, 2009 A. SUMMARY OF AUDIT RESULTS I. The auditor's report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the County of Dukes County, Massachusetts. 2. No significant deficiencies relating to the audit of the financial statements are reported in the Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards. 3. No instances of noncompliance material to the financial statements of the County of Dukes County, which would be required to be reported in accordance with Governmental Auditing Standards, were disclosed during the audit. 4. No significant deficiencies over major federal award programs were disclosed during the audit. 5. The auditor's report on compliance for the major federal awards programs for the County of Dukes County, Massachusetts. 6. There are no audit findings relative to the major federal awards programs for the County of Dukes County, Massachusetts. 7. The programs tested as major programs included: U.S. Department of Transportation: Airport Improvement Program (CFDA #20.106). 8. The threshold for distinguishing Types A and B programs was $300,000. 9. The County of Dukes County, Massachusetts was determined to be a low-risk auditee. B. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT None. C. FINDINGS - MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS None. D. FINDINGS - PRIOR YEAR AUDIT None. 7