Beverly Hills Unified School District

Similar documents
RE: CORRECTIONS to the 3/29/18 BHUSD Statement Regarding Impasse

Table of School Districts listing STIPENDS FOR ADVANCED DEGREES

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

SUMMARY OF ALLOCATION ALTERNATIVES

Does use of the variable crowd out or diminish the weight in the formula of a more representative variable?

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Formula Allocation / Local Return Agenda Number: 8.

UCLA Working Paper Series

STAFF REPORT. Attachments: 1. Local Streets and Roads Projected. Revenues

Understanding the Impact of a Countywide. in Los Angeles

BEVRLYRLY STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 10, 2018 To: From: Subject:

Bulletin No. 4. July 13, 2007

Business Administrators Los Angeles County School Districts, Regional Occupational Centers/Programs (ROC/Ps), and Joint Powers Agencies (JPAs)

Josie Lomack, Assistant Director Accounting, Disbursements, and Financial Systems Division of School Financial Services

Capitalization and the Voucher: An Analysis of Precinct Returns from California s Proposition 174 1

2011 California District Report Cards:

CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK Summary of Solid Waste Services Proposals

The CoStar Industrial Report

City of Inglewood. Special Meeting of City Council. Evaluation of Solid Waste and Recycling Services Proposals

Processing Entitlement. % of Coop Entitlement

APPROVE FISCAL YEAR 2012 TRANSIT FUND ALLOCATIONS AND RELATED ACTIONS

Wiseburn Unified School District

Portola Valley School District

Raising the minimum wage: What do we know? What should cities do?

REFUSE COLLECTION COST OF SERVICE STUDY CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 25, 2017

SUBJECT: CONTRACTING AND BUILDING TRADES BUSINESS LICENSE TAX REBATE

The Cost of Doing Business in Los Angeles

GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 2, 2010

Wiseburn Unified School District

Projects must have a Municipal (permittee) sponsor. Projects must be in an approved stormwater management plan.

Finance and Insurance Committee Item 8-1 April 11, 2016

Rate Structure Administrative Procedures Handbook FY 2017/18

Bond Update Presentation Azusa Unified School District

Manhattan Beach Unified School District Los Angeles County, California Continuing Disclosure Annual Report.

Securing Burbank s Financial Future

Rate Structure Administrative Procedures Handbook FY 2018/19

16501 Ventura Blvd. Suite 511 Encino California ph fx

Steven A. Preston, City Manager. David A. Lawton, Chief of Police. All City :Management Services Crossing Guard Contract

Los Angeles County Democratic Party Ballot Measures Committee 2017 Spring Elections March 7, 2017

Lennox School District

California Travel Impacts p

An Introduction to the Taxpayers Right to Know and Vote on Taxes Initiative

7/25/2012. July 25, Rate Refinement Workgroup Page 1 July 25, 2012

RE: Board Memo 5G 2: Adopt resolution maintaining the tax rate for fiscal year 2013/14 OPPOSE

Palo Alto Unified School District

Sewer Rate Study July 2016

Foreign Direct Investment

CITY OF POMONA. Financial Update Community Meetings

National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems 2010 Annual Conference

Meeting #1 June 29, 2012

Circuit Reliability Review

City of El Segundo PARS Pension Rate Stabilization Program (PRSP) August 31, 2017

CONTINUING DISCLOSURE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, Certificates of Participation. General Obligation Bonds

Agenda. Tuesday, July 17, :30AM. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority BUS OPERATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED, 2015

UPDATE ON DIRECTOR PARK'S NOVEMBER MOTION REGARDING BUS STOP BENCHES AND SHELTERS

City of Azusa Opportunity Zone Investment Prospectus

$250 MILLION RESIDENTIAL NON-PERFORMING LOAN AUCTION

Measure R Oversight Committee Annual Report on FY13 Audits

Full Time Faculty Salary Comparisons in California Community Colleges

November 8, 2005 Special Election

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY

Robla School District

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012

Measure R Oversight Committee Annual Report on FY11 Audits

PROJECTED BUDGET & LONG TERM FINANCIAL ANALYSIS & PLAN

SIX AGENCY COMMITTEE Statements of Cash Receipts and Disbursements. Years ended June 30, 2014 and (With Independent Auditor s Report Thereon)

These allocations are based on the best information available at this time.

STIFEL RBC CAPITAL MARKETS

MFS CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FUND

Mt. San Antonio College N. Grand Avenue Walnut, CA Request for Proposals. for. International Student Health Insurance program RFP #3132

TRUST AGREEMENT. by and between THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. and. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Certificate Agent

Metro VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION. January 10, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) System

Cordova Street Road Diet Project

Aromas San Juan Unified School District (CA)

Cost of Doing Business Survey

ACTION PLAN & BUDGET COMMITTEE. R December 5, 2017 AGENDA ITEM 2

Fiscal Review. December 3, Prepared By: Sheila Vickers Vice President. Lewis Wiley, Jr. Director, Management Consulting Services

Finances (Adopted 1969, updated 1975, redone 1976, 1977, 1981 and 1995.)

Central Basin Municipal Water District

NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Moody s: Aa3 S&P: AA- (See MISCELLANEOUS Ratings herein.)

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY $11,695,000 LEASE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2013

California Jurisdictions with Mobilehome Park Rent Stabilization Ordinances

California. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2017

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza ~ Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA metro.net

Local Revenue Measures November 8, 2011

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO STATISTICAL SECTION

City of Los Angeles, California Continuing Disclosure Filing Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) For the Period Ending June 30, 2017

AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES CITY MANAGER'S DEPARTMENT Paul Arevalo, City Manager

GREATER LOS ANGELES COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

El Rancho Unified School District Continuing Disclosure Annual Report For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

West Covina, California

SANTA MONICA MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

A. Approve the revised Alameda Corridor East (ACE) program scope; and

$5,730,000 COTATI-ROHNERT PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Sonoma County, California) 2013 General Obligation Refunding Bonds

GAVILAN JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MEASURE E BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND GILROY, CALIFORNIA

CA JURISDICTIONS with Mobilehome Park Rent Stabilization Ordinances (Revised 2015)

Cost of Doing Business Survey

Bakersfield City School District

Budget Introduction Proposed Budget

Transcription:

Beverly Hills Unified School District February 13, 2018 June 2018 Bond Election & Parcel Tax Considerations

Section I Bond Election Considerations

Bond Program Considerations General obligation bond programs are generally structured based on: Funding needs District projects Scope Cost Timing Financing constraints District assessed value ( AV ) Interest rates Tax rates Legal parameters State law Federal law 3

District AV The District s 2017 18 AV grew by 9.10% over 2016 17 AV ($ Billions) 40 30 20 10 District Total AV 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Fiscal Year Growth Statistics Annualized Growth Rates: Lowest Rolling Averages: 1 year: 9.10 % 3 year: 2.77 % 5 year: 7.04 5 year: 1.66 10 year: 5.75 10 year: 2.77 15 year: 6.46 15 year: 4.25 20 year: 6.70 20 year: 4.44 25 year: 4.97 25 year: 4.85 30 year: 5.76 30 year: 5.76 (1) Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. and Los Angeles County. FY Total AV (1) Annual % Change 1984 $ 3,770,009,915 1985 4,184,940,781 11.01 % 1986 4,595,225,234 9.80 1987 4,969,754,024 8.15 1988 5,924,171,850 19.20 1989 6,533,032,514 10.28 1990 7,329,089,485 12.19 1991 8,133,437,105 10.97 1992 8,924,564,007 9.73 1993 9,465,154,234 6.06 1994 9,461,150,966 0.04 1995 9,375,292,885 0.91 1996 8,875,438,269 5.33 1997 8,695,235,409 2.03 1998 8,707,045,130 0.14 1999 9,076,562,622 4.24 2000 10,164,952,942 11.99 2001 10,963,019,000 7.85 2002 11,863,249,407 8.21 2003 12,435,398,946 4.82 2004 13,177,386,529 5.97 2005 14,099,405,126 7.00 2006 15,357,318,259 8.92 2007 16,658,216,637 8.47 2008 18,192,827,010 9.21 2009 20,336,885,893 11.79 2010 21,580,660,411 6.12 2011 21,015,293,124 2.62 2012 21,270,744,327 1.22 2013 22,650,004,158 6.48 2014 24,138,138,896 6.57 2015 25,393,783,976 5.20 2016 27,706,036,395 9.11 2017 29,170,023,674 5.28 2018 31,824,217,427 9.10 4

LA County Unified School District Tax Rates (1) El Rancho Lynwood Wiseburn Bassett Paramount Pomona South Pasadena Long Beach Covina Valley Duarte Norwalk La Mirada Montebello Baldwin Park Compton Los Angeles Rowland Heights Inglewood El Segundo Azusa Pasadena Downey Hacienda La Puente Alhambra Temple City San Gabriel West Covina Charter Oak Manhattan Beach Torrance Redondo Beach Monrovia Bonita Claremont Beverly Hills Arcadia Santa Monica Malibu Walnut Valley Las Virgenes San Marino Glendora Culver City La Cañada Glendale Bellflower Burbank Acton Agua Dulce ABC Palos Verdes Peninsula $23.09 $36.52 $31.07 2017 18 Los Angeles County Unified School District Tax Rates (1) $105.91 $105.47 $105.38 $105.31 $103.00 $102.32 $100.78 $95.14 $95.11 $94.61 $88.85 $86.30 $85.36 $81.47 $80.61 $80.08 $75.51 $73.97 $73.88 $73.84 $67.57 $65.43 $64.92 $59.13 $52.85 $50.57 $49.94 (1) Source: Los Angeles County Auditor Controller as of 2017 18. Tax rates per $100,000 of AV. 5 $151.36 $147.32 $142.05 $140.61 $138.18 $135.14 $130.39 $122.30 $122.19 $118.41 $116.75 $116.47 $177.53 $174.43 $174.09 $172.92 $ $25.00 $50.00 $75.00 $100.00 $125.00 $150.00 $175.00 $200.00 $191.73 $190.14

2017 18 Total Typical Tax Rates As of 2017 18, the Beverly Hills Unified School District s bond tax rate constituted approximately 6.94% of the total property taxes assessed against homeowners (within a typical tax rate area #2410): Tax Rate (%) Tax Rate (per $100,000 of AV) Estimated Taxes for Median Single Family Home in BHUSD (1) General Tax Rate 1.00000% $1,000.00 $17,867.07 City of Beverly Hills 0.02387 23.87 426.49 Beverly Hills Unified School District 0.08008 80.08 1,430.74 Los Angeles Community College District 0.04599 45.99 821.71 Metropolitan Water District 0.00350 3.50 62.53 Total Tax Rate 1.15344% $1,153.44 $20,608.54 (1) AV of median single family home in the District as of 2017 18: $1,786,707. 6

June 2018 Election Scenario A: Two Bond Issuances Summary: Request voters to authorize a new tax in an amount of up to $60 per $100,000 of AV; tax would be added to the existing aggregate tax rate for previously issued bonds Assumptions: Two bond issuances Interest rates: 5.50% 6.00% (1) Up to 26 year financings Current interest bonds only No capital appreciation bonds ( CABs ) Annual AV growth rate: 4.00% Note: the District s 2016 election assumed a $44 tax rate to generate $260 million. Prospective Issuance Schedule (2) Estimated Issue Issue Date Proceeds Estimated % CABs Repayment Ratio Series A August 2018 $ 207,000,000 0.00 % 2.07 to 1 Series B August 2020 207,000,000 0.00 2.18 to 1 Total $ 414,000,000 0.00 % 2.13 to 1 Sensitivity Analysis Tax Rate per $100,000 of AV Bond Proceeds $60.00 $ 414,000,000 50.00 345,000,000 44.00 303,600,000 40.00 276,000,000 37.68 260,000,000 30.00 207,000,000 20.00 138,000,000 10.00 69,000,000 (1) Assumes higher than current market interest rates. Subject to market fluctuations. (2) Issuance schedule for illustrative purposes only. Actual amounts and dates will be tailored to the District s project needs. 7

Projected Tax Rates: Scenario A (1) $80 $60 $40 $20 $ 2018 Bond Election Tax Rates $180 $150 $120 $90 $60 $30 $ Aggregate District Tax Rates 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 Tax Rate (Per $100,000 of AV) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 Tax Rate (Per $100,000 of AV) Fiscal Year Series A Series B Prop 39 Max ($60) (1) Assumes AV growth of 4% annually. Prop S & Measure K Fiscal Year Measure E 2018 Election 8

June 2018 Election Scenario B: Four Bond Issuances Summary: Request voters to authorize a new tax in an amount of up to $60 per $100,000 of AV; tax would be added to the existing aggregate tax rate for previously issued bonds Assumptions: Four bond issuances Interest rates: 5.50% 6.00% (1) Up to 27 year financings Current interest bonds only No CABs Annual AV growth rate: 4.00% Prospective Issuance Schedule (2) Estimated Issue Issue Date Proceeds Estimated % CABs Repayment Ratio Series A August 2018 $ 127,200,000 0.00 % 1.98 to 1 Series B August 2020 127,200,000 0.00 2.02 to 1 Series C August 2022 127,200,000 0.00 2.14 to 1 Series D August 2024 127,200,000 0.00 2.25 to 1 Total $ 508,800,000 0.00 % 2.10 to 1 Sensitivity Analysis Tax Rate per $100,000 of AV Bond Proceeds $60.00 $ 508,800,000 50.00 424,000,000 44.00 373,120,000 40.00 339,200,000 30.66 260,000,000 30.00 254,400,000 20.00 169,600,000 10.00 84,800,000 (1) Assumes higher than current market interest rates. Subject to market fluctuations. (2) Issuance schedule for illustrative purposes only. Actual amounts and dates will be tailored to the District s project needs. 9

Projected Tax Rates: Scenario B (1) $80 $60 $40 $20 $ 2018 Bond Election Tax Rates $180 $150 $120 $90 $60 $30 $ Aggregate District Tax Rates 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 Tax Rate (Per $100,000 of AV) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 Tax Rate (Per $100,000 of AV) Fiscal Year Series A Series B Series C Series D Prop 39 Max ($60) (1) Assumes AV growth of 4% annually. Prop S & Measure K Fiscal Year Measure E 2018 Election 10

Section II Parcel Tax Considerations

Parcel Tax Overview A parcel tax is a special tax that generates proceeds which can be used for virtually any purpose (as long as it is designated), such as: Certificated and classified salaries and benefits Books, materials and supplies Computers and other equipment Educational programs Facilities Set as a fixed rate per parcel of taxable property within District boundaries May be subject to annual inflation increases No maximum term of tax Certain exemptions allowed Senior exemptions Supplemental Security Income ( SSI ) disability exemption Contiguous parcels exemption Requires approval of 2/3rds of District s registered voters 12

Assessed Values and Parcels by Land Use (1) As of 2016 17, the District had 10,102 taxable parcels 2016 17 % of # of % of Non Residential: Assessed Valuation (2) Total Parcels Total Commercial/Office/Hotel $8,080,146,374 28.25 % 549 5.43 % Vacant Commercial 87,614,470 0.31 44 0.44 Industrial 15,477,396 0.05 12 0.12 Recreational 18,046,691 0.06 8 0.08 Government/Social/Institutional 165,814,801 0.58 151 1.49 Subtotal Non Residential $8,367,099,732 29.25 % 764 7.56 % Residential: Single Family Residence $16,187,036,579 56.60 % 6,000 59.39 % Condominium/Townhouse 1,658,367,060 5.80 1,937 19.17 2 4 Residential Units 517,625,110 1.81 472 4.67 5+ Residential Units/Apartments 1,252,675,611 4.38 669 6.62 Vacant Residential 616,357,646 2.16 260 2.57 Subtotal Residential $20,232,062,006 70.75 % 9,338 92.42 % Total $28,599,161,738 100.00 % 10,102 100.00 % (1) Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. (2) Local secured assessed valuation; excluding tax exempt property. 13

Estimating the Senior Exemption Senior exemptions (and other miscellaneous fees) will result in a loss of revenue For purposes of the analysis on page five, 20% is the assumed senior exemption Age of Voters in Beverly Hills USD November 2016 Election (1) 40% Age Group Breakdown within Beverly Hills USD (2) Age Group # of Voters % of Voters Age 18 24 1,470 6.96 % Age 25 34 3,533 16.72 Age 35 44 2,982 14.11 Age 45 54 3,531 16.71 Age 55 64 3,460 16.37 Age 65+ 6,157 29.13 Total Voters 21,133 100.00 % % of District 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 21.1% 19.2% 27.3% 12.6% 19.8% <19 20 34 35 54 55 64 >65 Age Group (1) Source: Political Data Inc. (2) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 2014 American Community Survey 5 Year Estimates. 14

Illustrative Parcel Tax Amounts Tax Amount Taxable Parcels Senior Exemptions & Miscellaneous 1st Year Net Revenues 2nd Year 3% Annual Inflation Factor 3rd Year 3% Annual Inflation Factor 4th Year 3% Annual Inflation Factor 5th Year 3% Annual Inflation Factor $50 10,102 20.0% $404,080 $416,202 $428,688 $441,549 $454,796 $100 10,102 20.0% $808,160 $832,405 $857,377 $883,098 $909,591 $150 10,102 20.0% $1,212,240 $1,248,607 $1,286,065 $1,324,647 $1,364,387 $200 10,102 20.0% $1,616,320 $1,664,810 $1,714,754 $1,766,197 $1,819,182 $250 10,102 20.0% $2,020,400 $2,081,012 $2,143,442 $2,207,746 $2,273,978 $300 10,102 20.0% $2,424,480 $2,497,214 $2,572,131 $2,649,295 $2,728,774 $350 10,102 20.0% $2,828,560 $2,913,417 $3,000,819 $3,090,844 $3,183,569 $400 10,102 20.0% $3,232,640 $3,329,619 $3,429,508 $3,532,393 $3,638,365 15

Parcel Tax Considerations Tax Amount Amount? Inflation adjustment? Duration Term of the tax? Permanent tax? Exemption Include senior exemption? Other Which programs to be funded? 16