Approved Operating and Capital Budget January 2, 2007

BUDGET 2007 Approved Operating and Capital Budget January 2, 2007 Budget and Business Plans Council approved policy in August of 2003 requiring that administration prepare three-year business plans as part of the annual budgeting process. The purpose was to establish goals and develop longer- term strategies. The 3-year business plans acts as a guide for the development of the annual budget. The Capital budget is prepared as a 5-year plan. Guiding Principles Mayor and Council in the spring of 2006 discussed and agreed on a list of Priorities. These Priorities were provided to Administration for inclusion into the 3-year business plans and 2007 Budget proposal. These priorities included Land Release for Housing Development of additional Housing Development of Performance Measures Assisted Living Facility development Implementation of Facility Review recommendations Maintaining and meeting formal service delivery standards Completion of Town Trail Acquiring new funding sources Proceed with an integrated Community Planning process. Centennial Park Improvements Approved Budget The $10,230,784 operating budget for 2007 maintains the current high level of municipal services residents currently receive, and provide funding to proceed with new priorities and initiatives. Revenues from municipal taxation will be increased by 7.6%, from $4,796,194 (2006 budget) to $5,160,625 (2007 budget). Details on page 5. Tax Impacts A single detached home assessed at $360,000 will see in an increase of $ 65 per year or $ 5.43 per month. A commercial property assessed at $1,000,000 would see in an increase of $1,195 per year or $99.59 per month. Note - projections based on the tax split remaining at 6.5 to 1.

Until such time as alternative revenue sources are provided to Alberta Municipalities, it is predicted that similar increases will be necessary in the future if existing services are to be maintained. A comparison of tax increases in other Alberta communities over the past three years is on page 6. Tax Splits and impact on Tax Rates A 6.5 to 1 tax split means the commercial tax rate is 6.5 times higher than the residential tax rate. In 2006 the 6.5 to 1 tax split resulted in 81% of the Municipal tax revenues being collected from Commercial properties and 19% from residential properties. If the tax split is lowered, then a greater portion of the Municipal tax is collected from the residential sector. Mayor and Council review the tax split when the tax rate bylaw is considered in April/May. The tax rate bylaw is prepared after the Province sets the Education tax requisition with the tabling of the Provincial budget, usually about the 1 st week of April. The tax split was decreased from 7.5 to 6.5 in 2004. Factors impacting the tax split in the are the education tax burden on residential property and land rents becoming $1 per year in 2001 at which time Commercial property owners realized the largest savings. Residential Taxes Residential taxes in the are slightly lower than a comparison of 13 other Alberta Municipalities. The comparison used is a bungalow - 10-15 years old with 3 bedrooms 2 baths and single detached garage. This comparison on page 7, indicate the 2005 taxes in the Municipality of Jasper were approximately $200 less than the sample average. Commercial Municipal Taxes A comparison of 128 Alberta towns indicate the Commercial Municipal tax rate, with a 6.5 to 1 tax split is slightly higher than the average for Commercial properties. In 2006 the tax rate for municipal purposes was 15.802. The average of the 128 Municipalities was 14.129 with the range being 4.578 to 35.000. Utility Fees (water, sewage and solid waste) A survey of 25 similar sized communities indicates that the utility rates are very close to the sample average. This information is on pages 8 & 9. Water and Sewage rates Water and Sewage operations include the distribution and treatment systems. Water and Sewage is funded entirely by utility fees and conditional grants. Municipal taxation is not used in the water and sewage operations. Proposed expenditures in Water and Sewage require a 2% increase in 2007 from the 2006 rates. Page 2 of 10

Solid Waste Fees A committee consisting of residents and municipal staff in 2006 reviewed the rates and rate structure. Based on this review, it was recommended to Council on December 16 th, 2006 that adjustments to the rate structure occur. The bear proof garbage receptacle system required in Jasper, prohibits a pay as you throw system which is becoming the generally accepted form of paying for solid waste. Information gathered indicate the solid waste pick up costs for the commercial sector account for 60% of the costs, however the commercial sector contributes 46% of the revenues, apartments account for 9% of costs & contribute 15% of revenue and residential account for 33% of the costs and contribute 38% of the revenue. The approved budget requires an increase of 20% in solid waste revenue from user fees with municipal taxation contributing $75,000 in 2007 towards the total operational costs of $530k. The Solid Waste review committee presented their report and recommendations to Council on December 16, 2006. A copy of this presentation is on the Municipal Website. Council will be considering a bylaw to approve the recommended solid waste fees in January and February of 2007. Day Care Early Childhood Programmes The is one of only two Municipalities in Alberta that directly provide Day Care services. The 2007 budget approved continued operations of the Child Care program, with user fee rates increasing 4%. This will require an increase in the municipal tax contribution for FCS, COS and Day Care from $274,360 to $328,925. A number of parents have submitted letters to Council requesting that the integration of Day Care and the former Nursery School program revert back to a separate society operation in September of 2007. A decision on this request will occur in the near future. The combination of higher than average wages provided under the CUPE agreement, the desire to maintain fees at affordable levels, and the provision of services to part time and casual users results in high quality programming that meets the needs of many. Continuing to be the direct and sole provider of these services requires additional municipal tax subsidies in the future. Continuation of Federal and Provincial funding subsidies for Day Care remains uncertain. The options as identified by Administration are: Continue as the sole provider for this service this requires additional facilities and increased support from municipal taxes. It is projected that, subject to Provincial and Federal funding remaining as is the additional cost per year to continue to provide this service will likely grow by $20k to $30k per annum. This would represent an annual.5 % increase in Municipal tax. Provide a maximum number of spaces that can be accommodated in the current facility (approx 33-35) and encourage, possibly through the provision of subsidies to private operators or societies, provided they meet operating criteria established and approved by Council to pick up the excess need. This might result in a somewhat lower demand on municipal taxes. Page 3 of 10

Phase out operating Day Care on a direct basis but continue to provide municipal tax subsidies to private operators or societies, provided they meet operating criteria and standards approved by Council. Summary of Approved Budget Revenues 7.6% increase in Municipal taxation revenues 20% increase in solid waste fees Increase water rates by 2% - sewage by 2% 4% increase in Day Care and majority of Recreation rentals and fees. Increase fine revenues in Bylaw from $22k (2006 budget) to $35.5k (2007 budget) - this increase is based on the elimination of the current practice of issuing warning tickets on a 7 1 ratio to actual tickets. Expenditures Fund Solid waste operations $75k from Municipal Taxation Provide for inflationary increase in ambulance and dispatch contracts Emphasis and funding for increased marketing of Culture and Recreation facilities. Provision of $81,000 for new initiatives in Community Planning and costs involved in proceeding with land release for Housing. Provision of taxation support for CFS programs such as summer fun, after school care, community dinners Provides funding for an additional ½ staff position for environmental services roads & streets operations. Maintains current service levels in Grounds & Parks service levels. Provision of funding to implement compensation review recommendations Reduction of 1 FT staff in W & S Capital Budget Progress continues to be made on the 10-year capital plan that was developed and presented at the time of the vote on local governance in 2001. Approximately $25 Million in improvements to the Municipal Infrastructure have occurred to date. In 2007 there is $11.1 Million in capital projects are proposed, with some of this work being carried over from the 2006 Capital plan. The details on the 2007 Capital budget are on page 10. The Five-Year Capital plan projects total expenditures of approximately $21 Million. It is projected that more than $16 Million or 78% of the five year capital program will be financed through Conditional Capital funding sources. The Capital budget continues to fully fund the recapitalization program This is vital to maintaining the assets of the Municipality. Page 4 of 10

2007 Approved Operating Budget 2007 2006 Revenues Expenditures Taxation Support Taxation Support Governance and Administration 170,300 1,037,471 867,171 817,296 6.1% Corporate, Bylaw and Housing 112,000 470,691 358,691 363,255-1.3% Inflationary costs and funding for integrated community planning, & land release for housing Ambulance 156,000 212,440 56,440 71,840-21.4% FCS, COS and Day Care 817,450 1,146,375 328,925 274,360 19.9% Environment Services 2,549,378 3,832,471 1,283,093 1,192,571 7.6% Expect Provincial support to continue Inflation - tax support for programming Inflationary increases, taxation support for solid waste, recycling. Fire - Emergency Services 219,653 592,977 373,324 357,704 4.4% Inflationary costs Culture - Recreation/Parks - Facility Operations 795,378 1,910,687 1,115,309 1,085,569 2 Inflationary costs Culture - Library - 127,042 127,042 112,156 13.3% Inflation & agreement with regional association Culture - Museum - 27,184 27,184 26,265 3.5% Inflationary increase Community Culture and Economic Development funds - 35,000 35,000 30,000 16.7% Funding allocation for distribution Land Rent and Planning - 538,446 538,446 515,178 4.5% Inflationary increase Capital - 250,000 250,000 250,000 0.0% Annual contribution Compensation review contingency - 50,000 50,000 Franchise Fees 250,000 - - 250,000-300,000-16.7% 5,070,159 10,230,784 5,160,625 4,796,194 7.6% Page 5 of 10

Comparison of Municipal Tax Increases over the past 3 years Municipality Population 2004 2005 2006 3 yr avg BANFF 8,352 0.00% 3.50% 2.80% 2.10% DRUMHELLER 7,785 5.76% 2.78% 6.92% 5.15% EDMONTON 712,391 5.30% 4.61% 3.20% 4.37% EDSON 8,365 5.00% 5.00% 6.50% 5.50% GRIMSHAW 2,435 7.22% 3.61% 3.81% 4.88% HIGH RIVER 9,522 15.70% 13.10% 14.70% 14.50% JASPER 4,511 1.10% 3.50% 6.00% 3.53% LETHBRIDGE 77,202 9.50% 8.70% 10.30% 9.50% STETTLER 5,226 4.25% 7.24% 11.34% 7.61% SYLVAN LAKE 8,504 13.77% 12.10% 11.77% 12.55% AVERAGE 6.76% 6.41% 7.73% 6.97% Page 6 of 10

2005 Residential Tax rate Comparison Municipal Tax Rate Education Tax Rate Seniors Lodge Tax Rate Total Tax Rate Municipality Assessment Residential ** Residential Residential Residential 1 PINCHER CREEK 200,000 13.462 4.737 0.171 18.370 2 DRUMHELLER 180,000 11.567 4.569 0.000 16.136 3 DIDSBURY 200,000 10.000 4.295 0.142 14.437 4 CORONATION 130,000 16.417 5.103 0.515 22.035 5 NANTON 190,000 10.007 4.622 0.258 14.887 6 OYEN 120,000 17.900 5.106 0.343 23.349 7 EDMONTON 275,000 5.883 3.800 0.000 9.683 8 CALGARY 325,000 3.968 4.062 0.000 8.030 9 CANMORE 410,000 3.187 2.781 0.119 6.087 10 JASPER 360,000 2.431 4.398 0.059 6.888 11 BANFF 360,000 2.427 4.160 0.050 6.637 12 SUNDRE 180,000 7.683 4.383 0.145 12.211 13 STETTLER 150,000 8.562 4.747 0.367 13.676 Average 236,923 8.730 4.366 0.167 13.263 Comparison of Municipal Taxes Total Taxes Payable Residential Seniors Education Taxes Lodge Taxes Total Taxes Residential Residential Residential Assessment 1 PINCHER CREEK 200,000 $ 2,692 $ 947 $ 34 $ 3,674 2 DRUMHELLER 180,000 $ 2,082 $ 822 $ - $ 2,904 3 DIDSBURY 200,000 $ 2,000 $ 859 $ 28 $ 2,887 4 CORONATION 130,000 $ 2,134 $ 663 $ 67 $ 2,865 5 NANTON 190,000 $ 1,901 $ 878 $ 49 $ 2,829 6 OYEN 120,000 $ 2,148 $ 613 $ 41 $ 2,802 7 EDMONTON 275,000 $ 1,618 $ 1,045 $ - $ 2,663 8 CALGARY 325,000 $ 1,289 $ 1,320 $ - $ 2,610 9 CANMORE 410,000 $ 1,307 $ 1,140 $ 49 $ 2,496 10 JASPER 360,000 $ 875 $ 1,583 $ 21 $ 2,480 11 BANFF 360,000 $ 874 $ 1,498 $ 18 $ 2,389 12 SUNDRE 180,000 $ 1,383 $ 789 $ 26 $ 2,198 13 STETTLER 150,000 $ 1,284 $ 712 $ 55 $ 2,051 Average 236,923 $ 1,661 $ 990 $ 30 $ 2,681 ** based on a modern 1,200 to 1,500 sq. ft house, 10-15 years old, 3 bdrms, 2 baths, few upgrades Page 7 of 10

Annual Utility Charges for Standardized Residential 2006 Rates Based on a consumption of 360 Cubic meters per annum. If amount is 0 -- it means the costs are likely being funded by Municipal tax. Municipality Water Sewer Storm Solid Waste Total City of Camrose 693 316 0 90 1,098 Town of Olds 558 352 0 177 1,086 Town of Morinville 515 366 0 138 1,018 Town of Strathmore 452 427 17 115 1,012 City of Leduc 393 344 60 144 941 Town of Canmore 268 494 0 164 926 Town of Beaumont 346 402 0 172 921 City of Fort Saskatchewan 432 317 0 158 906 Town of Stony Plain 389 346 0 153 888 City of Cold Lake 464 232 0 180 876 Town of Devon 389 361 0 102 852 Town of Chestermere 408 440 0 0 848 Town of Rocky Mountain House 440 293 0 110 843 Town of Sylvan Lake 366 296 0 180 842 Average 409 297 3 120 829 City of Spruce Grove 449 225 0 142 816 256 403 0 148 807 Town of Whitecourt 332 332 0 138 801 Town of Edson 392 196 0 206 794 Town of Stettler 476 168 0 144 788 Town of St. Paul 411 206 0 120 737 Town of Wainwright 540 162 0 0 702 City of Brooks 331 162 0 157 650 Town of Banff 230 364 0 0 594 Town of Grande Cache 339 206 0 23 568 Town of Hinton 214 117 0 63 394 Page 8 of 10

Annual Cost of Water & Sew age for typical household (360 cubic Meters) & Solid Waste ** No User fee for Solid Waste - Water and sew age only City of Camrose Town of Olds Town of Morinville Town of Strathmore City of Leduc Town of Canmore Town of Beaumont City of Fort Saskatchew an Town of Stony Plain City of Cold Lake Town of Devon ** Town of Chestermere Town of Rocky Mountain House Town of Sylvan Lake Average of 25 communities City of Spruce Grove Town of Whitecourt Town of Edson Town of Stettler Town of St. Paul ** Tow n of Wainw right City of Brooks ** Town of Banff Town of Grande Cache Town of Hinton - 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Page 9 of 10

2007 Approved Capital Plan 2007 Budget Funding Sources Tonquin Turret, Birch, Larch & Miette - phase 1 - Use Funding from AB infrast deferred from 2006 (832,278) + 2007 grants from infrast, gas & streets grants 2,154,258 Prov. Ab. Infrastructure Program - (2006) 832,278 Prov. Ab. Infrastructure Program - (2007) 832,278 Federal & Prov fuel / road grants 429,350 Municipal Sponsorship Progam 60,352 Central Business District Utility and Street Upgrades - Patricia lane & Hazel 145,000 Jasper - Banff Special Grant 145,000 Pedestrian Underpass -- subject to obtaining $1.2M from CNR. 2,400,000 Jasper - Banff Special Grant 1,200,000 CNR 1,200,000 Water: Hydrant upgrades storz connector 20,000 Utility Reserves 20,000 Patricia Circle Planning 10,000 Utility Reserves 10,000 Activity Centre - Funding application for 3 Million from Fed - Prov Infrastructure (CAMRIF) 4,500,000 CAMRIF 3,000,000 General Reserves 1,500,000 Medical Clinic 750,000 Provincial Building Improvements 700,000 General Reserves Borrowing by Debenture General Reserves (deferred from 2006 budget) 300,000 450,000 700,000 Boulevard Replacement program 50,000 General Reserves 50,000 Public Works Security fencing 17,000 General Reserves 17,000 Community Cameras 30,000 From General Reserves 30,000 Administration capital - recap 60,000 From Operating Budget 60,000 Recreation capital - recap 142,000 From Operating Budget 142,000 Fire Dept capital - recap 22,000 From Operating Budget 22,000 Mobile Equipment 110,000 From Operating Budget 110,000 Total 2007 11,110,258 11,110,258 Page 10 of 10