SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO CQ DANNY KELLY, Appellant VERSUS. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee CIVIL ACTION

Similar documents
COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff Appellant,

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO CQ DANNY KELLY, Appellant VERSUS. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee CIVIL ACTION

May 30, c. Brief of Amicus Curiae United Policyholders in Support of Harold Fils Application for Rehearing from the May 9, 2018 Decision.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERIN SANBORN-ADLER, * v. * * No LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF * NORTH AMERICA, et al.

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO C-588. DANIEL ARCENEAUX, LOUIS DAVEREDE, JR., VIVES LEMMON AND JULES MENESSES, ET AL. Plaintiffs-Appellees,

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF UNITED POLICYHOLDERS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO SAMUEL DE DIOS, INDEMNITY INSRUANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, and BRODSIPRE SERVICES, INC.

COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2009 CA 1248 ROBERT REICH VERSUS. Judgment Rendered February Plaintiff Appellant.

F I L E D September 1, 2011

MARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

* * * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION L-6 Honorable Kern A. Reese, Judge

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. **********

Received by Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW AUERNHEIMER,

Certificate of Interested Persons

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv CW

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

CA NOS , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY. v. No CA ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO CA COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL.

Request for Depublication of Montrose Chemical Corp. of Cal. v. Superior Court, No. B (Issued, Aug. 31, 2017; Final, Sept.

Case 3:18-cv CWR-FKB Document 35 Filed 11/12/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION R S U I INDEMNITY COMPANY * CIVIL ACTION NO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC. Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC th DCA Case No. 5D

IN THE UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION. Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-655

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT KAWA ORTHODONTICS, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

No CV. In the Fifth Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

No. 47,333-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. JOHN C. GORMAN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant

J cj g f NUMBER 2007 CA 1493

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A

Appealed from the Office of Workers Compensation District 6. Livingston LA. Judgment Rendered February Attorney for.

No. 47,320-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * *

BOARD OF TAX APPEALS STATE OF LOUISIANA

Insurance Bad Faith Law, Revisited. By Dean A. Sutherland

No , , Consolidated with Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA-01274

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

APPELLANT S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE S MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appealed Family Court Parish of East Baton Rouge NO 2007 CA from the. Trial Court No NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

BRIEF OF THE ACADEMY OF FLORIDA TRIAL LAWYERS, AMICUS CURIAE, SUPPORTING RESPONDENTS' POSITION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAY Of nee of the Clerk Suprorne Court Court of Appalll..

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

No. 42,281-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO: SC v. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D Lower Tribunal No.:

Case 2:07-cv SRD-JCW Document 61 Filed 06/17/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

Case No. 2018SC694. COLORADO SUPREME COURT 2 East 14th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80203

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No CV-T-17MAP.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Defendants-Appellees.

Alfred Seiple v. Progressive Northern Insurance


Mississippi Supreme Court

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

F I L E D September 14, 2012

BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RULING. This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Debtors. Polaroid Consumer Electronics, LLC; Polaroid Latin America I Corporation;

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIFTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv RNS

No. 51,892-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

MARIO DIAZ NO CA-1041 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EUDOLIO LOPEZ, ASSURANCE AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, DARRELL BUTLER AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

EXCESS V. PRIMARY: THE EXPANSION OF BAD FAITH DEFENSE CLAIMS IN LOUISIANA. Submitted by Ryan C. Higgins

MENTZ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. NO CA-1474 COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT JULIE D. POCHE STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM TAKAGI & ASSOCIATES, INC., INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: March 17, 2006

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ELEVATED TANK APPLICATORS, INC.

Court of Appeals. Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM TERRITORY OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM Appellee, vs. BEAU BRUNEMAN, Appellant.

Case 4:11-cv Document 143 Filed in TXSD on 06/25/13 Page 1 of 5

ANTHONY J. RUSSO NO CA-0952 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LIONEL BURNS, JR., AND THE HONORABLE ARTHUR A. MORRELL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT ACCELERATED DOCKET LARRY FRIDRICH : : JOURNAL ENTRY. For defendant-appellee : :

2015 IL App (5th) U NO IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Docket No In The United States Court of Appeals For The First Circuit. Appellee, DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, Defendant Appellant.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO. 2014-CQ-1921 DANNY KELLY, Appellant VERSUS STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee _ CIVIL ACTION _ On Certified Questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Docket No. 12-31064; United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, Docket No. 09-619-BAJ-SCR, Honorable Brian A. Jackson, Judge Presiding _ UNITED POLICYHOLDERS S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF _ Respectfully submitted: /s/ Michael J. debarros Michael J. debarros (#32422) Todd A. Rossi (#11478) Mark Mese (#14214) KEAN MILLER LLP 400 Convention St., Suite 700 Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Telephone: 225-387-0999 Facsimile: 225-388-9133 Attorneys for United Policyholders

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: NOW INTO COURT, through undersigned counsel, comes United Policyholders, who respectfully moves this Honorable Court for leave to file an original brief of amicus curiae in support of Plaintiff-Appellant, Danny Kelly, on the questions certified from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to the Louisiana Supreme Court in Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 582 F. App x 290 (5th Cir. 2014), certified question accepted, 2014-1921 (La. 11/21/14). United Policyholders is a unique national non-profit organization founded in 1991 that helps preserve the integrity of the insurance system. Donations, grants and volunteer labor support the organization s work. Through a Roadmap to Preparedness, Roadmap to Recovery and Advocacy and Action program, United Policyholders helps Louisiana residents to prepare for and recover from disasters and to protect their assets by making good insurance decisions. United Policyholders assisted Louisiana property owners after Hurricane Katrina, and regularly coordinates with Commissioner Jim Donelon and his staff to serve the State s insured home and business owners. By submitting a brief in this matter, United Policyholders seeks to fulfill the classic role of amicus curiae in a case of general public interest, supplementing the efforts of counsel, and drawing the court s attention to law that escaped consideration. Miller-Wohl Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Labor & Indus., 694 F.2d 203, 204 (9th Cir. 1982). This is an appropriate role for amicus curiae. As commentators have often stressed, an amicus is often in a superior position to focus the court s attention on the broad implications of various possible rulings. R. Stern, E. Greggman & S. Shapiro, Supreme Court Practice, 570-71 (1986) (quoting Ennis, Effective Amicus Briefs, 33 Cath. U.L. Rev. 603, 608 (1984)). Since it was founded in 1991, United Policyholders has filed over three hundred and fifty amicus briefs in state and federal appellate courts throughout the United States. United Policyholders amicus brief was cited in the U.S. Supreme Court s opinion in Humana Inc. v. Mary Forsyth, 525 U.S. 299 (1999). The organization has participated by court invitation in briefing and oral argument, and many of the arguments from United Policyholders amicus curiae briefs have been cited with approval by reviewing courts. 2

United Policyholders has previously been granted leave to file amicus curiae briefs in the Louisiana Supreme Court, in the matters of Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co., 2007-2441 (La. 4/8/08), 988 So. 2d 186, on reh g in part (July 7, 2008), and Ducote v. Koch Pipeline Co., L.P., 98-0942 (La. 1/20/99), 730 So. 2d 432, opinion modified on reh g (Feb. 26, 1999). United Policyholders has also been granted leave to file amicus curiae briefs in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in the matters of Pendergest-Holt v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd s of London, 600 F.3d 562 (5th Cir. 2010), Tuepker v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 507 F.3d 346, 348 (5th Cir. 2007), and Motiva Enterprises, LLC v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 445 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 2006). The certified questions concern the scope of duties owed by an insurer to its policyholder while it handles claims on its insured s behalf. The Court s resolution of these issues will have significant ramifications for insurance policyholders seeking to ascertain and understand their rights while insurers are defending or otherwise handling claims on behalf of their insureds. This matter will have a substantial impact on the abilities of policyholders to hold their insurers accountable, and will also impact the consistency of court decisions on a statewide basis. This is an area of the law in which United Policyholders and the undersigned attorneys submit it would be useful to the Court to allow the insurance policyholders perspective to be heard. The undersigned counsel for United Policyholders have significant experience in insurance litigation against major insurance companies, and believe that they will be able to provide assistance in analyzing the issues in this case and their public policy implications in a way that compliments the arguments raised by counsel for the parties to this appeal. Counsel for United Policyholders are retained pro bono, and will accept no money for their legal work in this case. The issues before this Honorable Court are of great importance to the citizens of the State of Louisiana. WHEREFORE, United Policyholders respectfully requests leave of Court to file the attached brief as amici curiae. 3

Respectfully submitted: /s/ Michael J. debarros Michael J. debarros (#32422) Todd A. Rossi (#11478) Mark Mese (#14214) KEAN MILLER LLP 400 Convention St., Suite 700 Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Telephone: 225-387-0999 Facsimile: 225-388-9133 Attorneys for United Policyholders 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that copies of United Policyholders s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Appellant, Danny Kelly, have been mailed by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to the following: Lee Ann Archer THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE A. ARCHER 1225 Rustic Ln Lake Charles, LA 70605 Frank Tomeny, III TOMENY LAW FIRM, APLC 6421 Perkins Rd Bldg B Ste A Baton Rouge, LA 70808-4263 Counsel for Appellant, Danny Kelly Henry Gerard Terhoeve Stephen Dale Cronin GUGLIELMO, MARKS, SCHUTTE, TERHOEVE & LOVE 320 Somerulos St Baton Rouge, LA 70802-6129 Counsel for Appellee, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company Hon. Lyle W. Cayce Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 600 S. Maestri Place New Orleans, LA 70130 Baton Rouge, Louisiana this 20 th day of January, 2015. /s/ Michael J. debarros Michael J. debarros 5

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO. 2014-CQ-1921 DANNY KELLY, Appellant VERSUS STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee ORDER Considering the foregoing United Policyholders s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief: IT IS ORDERED that United Policyholders is hereby GRANTED leave to file the attached brief as amicus curiae. THUS DONE AND SIGNED this day of January, 2015, in New Orleans, Louisiana. JUSTICE, LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT