Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Arlington County

Similar documents
Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. Fairfax County, Fairfax City and Falls Church Cities

Demographics. Housing Security in the Washington Region. District of Columbia

May 17, Housing Sector Overview

Milestones Program Stabilize housing, through a monthly rental subsidy, of chronically homeless individuals with serious mental illness.

Program Assessment Report 2017

Universal Intake Form

Continuum of Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) 2015 Policy Manual

EASTERN PANHANDLE HOME CONSORTIUM HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM FUNDING APPLICATION

Rental housing affordability in Pennsylvania. Eileen Divringi Community Development Research Analyst Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO

JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON

SECTION 8 FUND FUND SUMMARY

National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

CABELL-HUNTINGTON-WAYNE HOME CONSORTIUM - HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM - FUNDING APPLICATION

Grantee: Only complete blue sections. Do NOT type in sections other than blue. 3-5 Year Quantities. % of Goal. Actual. Actual. Actual. Goal.

COMM22 For-Sale Housing First-Time Homebuyer Assistance May 6, 2016

SOLANO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

DAVIS COUNTY, UTAH. County Community Data Profile

Homelessness Analytics Initiative Methodology Last Updated: 5/3/2013

2009 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR)

KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH, ALASKA

MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA

EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA

The state of the nation s Housing 2013

Federal Home Loan Banks Affordable Housing Program. April 17, 2018

LINN COUNTY, OREGON. County Community Data Profile

TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

IMPERIAL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Rural Housing, Inc. 1

How the Ross Plan Would Raise Rents on HUD-Assisted Households

APACHE COUNTY, ARIZONA

San Diego Affordable Housing Fund Annual Plan. Fiscal Year 2014 (July 1, 2013 June 30, 2014)

NAVAJO COUNTY, ARIZONA

KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON

PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA. County Community Data Profile

Standards for Success HOPWA Data Elements

Population and Housing Demand Projections for Metro Boston Regional Projections and Provisional Municipal Forecasts

House Subcommittee Holds Mark-Up of Affordable Housing and Self Sufficiency Improvement Act of 2012

Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

DESTINATION Which of the following most closely matches where the client will be staying right after leaving this project?

Community Development Block Grant Program

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Idaho Balance of State 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

STANISLAUS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Tarrant County/Ft. Worth 10/1/2012-9/30/2013

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

National Coalition for Homeless Veterans. May 28, USDA Rural Development Housing Programs Community Facilities Programs

Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle s Community Investment Programs. Chris Thomas, Relationship Manager

Jeff Davis Executive Vice President and Chief of Staff. Tracey McDermott Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

New Hampshire Continua of Care APR Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) Exit Form for HMIS

VHPD HMIS DATA: PROGRAM EXIT FORM

MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Boulder Housing Partners, 4800 N. Broadway, Boulder, CO Moving to Work Annual Report

WASHINGTON COUNTY HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CONSUMER GUIDELINES FOR HOMEBUYERS

2019 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) Guidance Document

Florida s Assisted Housing Tenants:

January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report

THURSTON COUNTY AFFORDABLE & HOMELESS HOUSING PROGRAMS 2012 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL GUIDELINES

IBO. Mayor Bloomberg s Housing Plan: Down Payment on the Future. City Spending On Housing Preservation Grows. Also available on our Web site...

Public Meeting Agenda Youngsville

San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC) Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Proposed Budget (July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017)

COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Reforming and Rationalizing Tax Expenditures: Developing and Testing a Framework

State of New Mexico 2017 National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

B-08-MN April 1, 2018 thru June 30, 2018 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

HHS PATH Intake Assessment

The Affordable Housing Crisis and the People it Affects. February America s Neighbors

FAMILY ASSETS FOR INDEPENDENCE IN MINNESOTA (FAIM) FAIM New Participant Application Form AGENCY USE ONLY : Agency Name:

Brunswick Housing Authority

Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. GROW Fund POLICY AND APPLICATIONS

Health Care and Homelessness 2014 Data Linkage Study

Economic Status of. Older Women. The. Status Report CONTACT INFORMATION. Acknowledgements

Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC)

The Section 8 Homeownership Program. Section 8 Families: Are You Ready for Homeownership? Introducing the Section 8 Homeownership Program

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

CLIENT CHECKLIST HOMELESS PREVENTION FUNDING Requirements That Must Be Met Before An Application Will be Processed

Universal Intake Form

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

SOURCES AND METHODS USED TO ESTIMATE COMPONENTS OF CHANGES IN SECTION 8 EXPENDITURES FROM 1996 TO 2003 by Will Fischer and Barbara Sard

Making Affordable Housing Work Act of 2018

K-1 APPENDIX K. SPENDING FOR INCOME-TESTED BENEFITS, FISCAL YEARS

Thank you for choosing Southeast CDC for Housing Counseling. We hope to help you make one of the most important purchases of your life.

FY 2018 Accomplishments

Puerto Rico Department of Housing 5 Year Plan for Fiscal Years Annual Plan for Fiscal Year 2000

CRS Report for Congress

Affordable Housing Finance. Jim Mather, Chief Lending Officer Housing Trust Silicon Valley 2018 Affordable Housing Week

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

Moving Forward. Moving to Work Program. Annual Plan for Fiscal Year 2011

Summary of 3 County CoC SPM Report Data

COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Joint Office of Homeless Services FY 2018 Proposed Budget

HMIS INTAKE - HOPWA. FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME LAST NAME (and Suffix) Client Refused. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander LIVING SITUATION

ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN FOR THE HOMEOWNERSHIP PROGRAM. Housing Authority of the County of Riverside

Colorado Division of Housing & Colorado Housing and Finance Authority Updates. October 5, 2016

National Housing Market Summary

Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation

City of Bellingham Housing Levy

Transcription:

Demographics Total Population 208,700 Pct. age 17 and under 16 Pct. age 18-64 76 Pct. age 65 and over 9 Households by HUD Area Median Income Level N % Extremely low (0 30% AMI) 9,100 10 Very low (31 50% AMI) 7,300 8 Low (51 80%) 5,100 5 Middle (81 120%) 27,500 30 High (over 120%) 43,200 47 Total households 92,100 100 Extremely low Very low Low Middle High Total Housing Tenure Pct. renter households 83 77 70 58 39 53 Pct. owner households 17 23 30 42 61 47 Household Composition Pct. of households: single adult 61 43 44 54 29 41 Pct. of households: families with children 26 21 21 14 22 20 Pct. of households: other family households 8 26 25 20 33 26 Pct. of households: non-family 6 10 9 11 16 13 Household Size Pct. one person 61 43 44 54 29 41 Pct. two people 18 30 24 25 42 32 Pct. three people 9 10 11 10 15 12 Pct. four to six people 13 17 21 9 15 13 Pct. seven or more people - - 0 1 0 1 Elderly or Disabled Household Members Pct. of households with elderly member 28 23 17 13 11 15 Pct. of households with a member with moderate or severe disabilities 13 9 4 3 3 4 Pct. of households with elderly member with moderate or severe disabilities 9 6 2 2 2 3 Household Employment (Mutually Exclusive Categories) Pct. households with one or more full-time workers 42 71 88 88 93 84 Pct. households with no full-time workers and one or more part-time workers 18 14 3 3 3 5 Pct. households with no one working (all adults are over age 65) 24 13 8 6 3 7 Pct. households with no one working (at least one working-age member) 15 2 1 3 2 4 Notes: Extremely low income = 0 30% of HUD area median income (AMI); very low income = 30 50% of AMI; low income = 50 80% of AMI; middle income = 80 120% of AMI; and high income = 120% of AMI or higher. Jurisdictions in the table are defined by their Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA), except where noted. Percentages have been rounded to the nearest integer and counts have been rounded to the nearest 100. Source: Urban Institute analysis of 2009 11 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata from the University of Minnesota Integrated Public Use Microdata Series. 1

Homelessness 2013 N % N % Total Population 266 100 211 100.0 Age Children ages 17 and under - - 123 58 Young adults ages 18-24 24 9 23 11 Adults age 25 and over 242 91 65 31 Age - no response - - - - Gender Male 208 78 72 34 Female 58 22 139 66 Transgender - - - - Gender - no response - - - - Employment N % N % Adults employed 57 21 64 73 Adults not employed 209 79 24 27 Adults employed - no response - - - - Income Adults with monthly income 172 65 76 86 Adults with no monthly income 57 21 12 14 Adults with monthly income - no response - - - - Primary Source of Income, Adults Job 53 20 62 70 Social security 4 2 1 1 Disability 32 12 3 3 TANF 19 7 5 6 Other 64 24 5 6 No income 57 21 12 14 No response 37 14 - - Assessing Need - All Homeless Total 266 100 211 100 Chronically homeless and need permanent supportive housing 156 59 - - Not chronically homeless and do not need permanent supportive housing 110 41 211 100 Assessing Need - In Emergency Shelter Total 120 100 211 100 Chronically homeless and need permanent supportive housing 63 53 - - Not chronically homeless and do not need permanent supportive housing 57 48 211 100 Assessing Need - Unsheltered Single Adults Persons in Families Total 146 100 - #VALUE! Chronically homeless and need permanent supportive housing 93 64 - #VALUE! Not chronically homeless and do not need permanent supportive housing 53 36 - #VALUE! 2

Homelessness 2013 Single Adults Persons in Families N % N % Bed Supply Total beds for the homeless 211 100 236 100 Total, excluding permanent supportive housing 139 66 236 100 Emergency shelter 46 22 71 30 Transitional housing 12 6 165 70 Winter/hypothermia 75 36 - - Safe Haven 6 3 - - Permanent supportive housing 72 34 - - Beds Occupied Total beds for the homeless 124 100 211 100 Total, excluding permanent supportive housing 120 97 211 100 Emergency shelter 46 37 70 33 Transitional housing 3 2 141 67 Winter/hypothermia 68 55 - - Safe Haven 3 2 - - Permanent supportive housing 4 3 - - Gap Analysis Chronically homeless 156 - - - Available beds 68 - - - Gap (or surplus) 88 - - - Unsheltered 146 - - - Available beds 19-26 - Gap (or surplus) 127 - (26) - Chronically homeless In emergency shelter 63 - - - Gap (or surplus) if chronically homeless are housed in permanent supportive housing 64 - (26) - Note: Permanent supportive housing besides currently occupied by individuals who were formerly homeless are not considered to be available to housing currently homeless individuals in need of permanent supportive housing. Source: Urban Institute analysis of Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments 2013 Point-in-Time Enumeration of the homeless. 3

Rental Housing N % Total renter-occupied units 49,300 90 Vacant rental units 5,600 10 Total rental units 54,900 Occupied units All units Monthly Gross Rent for Renter Households N % N % No rent paid 700 1 700 1 Under $800 3,200 7 3,500 6 $800 1,330 12,800 26 14,300 26 $1,330 1,690 11,600 24 13,100 24 $1,690 3,190 20,000 41 22,100 40 $3,190 or more 1,000 2 1,200 2 Subsidized Units by Program Type, 2012 N % All HUD programs 2,700 100 Public housing - - Section 8 certificates and vouchers 1,500 58 Section 8 moderate rehabilitation - 1 Section 8 new construction or substantial rehabilitation 900 35 Section 236-1.6 All other multifamily assisted projects 100 4.6 Low Income Housing Tax Credit 3,100 N/A Monthly Housing Costs as a Percent of Household Income for Renter-Occupied Units N % All renter households 49,300 Paying less than 30% of income in rent 29,800 61 Paying 30%-50% of income in rent 10,500 21 Paying 50% or more of income in rent 8,900 18 Extremely low income renter households 7,500 Paying less than 30% of income in rent 600 9 Paying 30%-50% of income in rent 700 9 Paying 50% or more of income in rent 6,200 82 Very low income renter households 5,600 Paying less than 30% of income in rent 500 9 Paying 30%-50% of income in rent 3,100 56 Paying 50% or more of income in rent 2,000 35 Low income renter households 3,600 Paying less than 30% of income in rent 1,300 37 Paying 30%-50% of income in rent 1,700 48 Paying 50% or more of income in rent 500 15 Middle income renter households 15,900 Paying less than 30% of income in rent 11,200 71 Paying 30%-50% of income in rent 4,400 28 Paying 50% or more of income in rent 200 1 High income renter households 16,700 Paying less than 30% of income in rent 16,100 97 Paying 30%-50% of income in rent 500 3 Paying 50% or more of income in rent - - 4

Rental Housing Occupancy of Affordable Rental Units (Supply) Extremely low Very low Low Middle High Total Higher income occupants (not available) 1,800 7,200 8,000 11,100-28,100 Same or lower-income occupants (available) 2,100 5,600 3,600 8,900 1,000 21,200 Vacant (available) 300 1,600 1,500 2,100 200 5,600 Total units 4,200 14,300 13,100 22,100 1,200 54,900 Percent of Affordable Units Not Available to Income Group 43 50 61 52 - Affordability Gap (Renter Households-Available Units ) 5,100 (1,500) (1,500) 4,900 15,500 Notes: Extremely low income = 0 30% of HUD area median income (AMI); very low income = 30 50% of AMI; low income = 50 80% of AMI; middle income = 80 120% of AMI; and high income = 120% of AMI or higher. Jurisdictions in the table are defined by their Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA), except where noted. Percentages have been rounded to the nearest integer and counts have been rounded to the nearest 100. Sources: Urban Institute analysis of 2009 11 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata from the University of Minnesota Integrated Public Use Microdata Series and Picture of Subsidized Housing 2012, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5

Homeownership N % Owner-occupied units 42,900 98 Vacant owner units 900 2 Total owner units 43,700 100 Monthly Housing Costs for Owner-Occupied Units N % Under $740 4,700 11 $740 1,240 5,500 13 $800 1,580 2,800 6 $1,580 2,970 17,700 41 $2,970 or more 12,200 29 Occupied units All units Monthly Housing Costs if Unit Sold to First-Time Homebuyer N % N % Under $740 700 2 800 2 $740 $1,240 1,200 3 1,200 3 $1,240 1,580 2,200 5 2,200 5 $1,580 2,970 12,100 28 12,400 28 $2,970 or more 26,700 62 27,200 62 Monthly Housing Costs if Unit Sold to Repeat Homebuyer Under $740 1,000 2 1,100 3 $740 $1,240 2,200 5 2,200 5 $1,240 1,580 3,800 9 3,800 9 $1,580 2,970 15,100 35 15,500 35 $2,970 or more 20,800 48 21,100 48 Monthly Housing Costs as a Percent of Household Income for Owner-Occupied N % All owner households 42,900 Paying less than 30% of income in housing costs 31,900 74 Paying 30%-50% of income in housing costs 8,000 19 Paying 50% or more of income in housing costs 3,000 7 Extremely low income owner households 1,600 Paying less than 30% of income in housing costs 200 10 Paying 30%-50% of income in housing costs 200 13 Paying 50% or more of income in housing costs 1,200 77 Very low income owner households 1,600 Paying less than 30% of income in housing costs 500 30 Paying 30%-50% of income in housing costs 500 28 Paying 50% or more of income in housing costs 700 41 Low income owner households 1,500 Paying less than 30% of income in housing costs 600 40 Paying 30%-50% of income in housing costs 800 51 Paying 50% or more of income in housing costs 100 9 Middle income owner households 11,600 Paying less than 30% of income in housing costs 7,100 61 Paying 30%-50% of income in housing costs 3,600 31 Paying 50% or more of income in housing costs 800 7 High income owner households 26,500 Paying less than 30% of income in housing costs 23,500 89 Paying 30%-50% of income in housing costs 2,900 11 Paying 50% or more of income in housing costs 100 1 6

Homeownership Occupancy of Affordable Owner Units (Supply) Extremely low Very low Low Middle High Total Higher income occupants (not available) 600 900 1,500 6,300-9,300 Same or lower-income occupants (available) 100 300 600 5,800 26,700 33,600 Vacant (available) 100 - - 300 500 900 Total units 800 1,200 2,200 12,400 27,200 43,700 Percent of Affordable Units Not Available to Income Group 73.5 72.5 71.2 50.9 - Affordability Gap (Owner Households-Available Units) 1,400 1,300 900 5,500 (600) Notes: Extremely low income = 0 30% of HUD area median income (AMI); very low income = 30 50% of AMI; low income = 50 80% of AMI; middle income = 80 120% of AMI; and high income = 120% of AMI or higher. Jurisdictions in the table are defined by their Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA), except where noted. Percentages have been rounded to the nearest integer and counts have been rounded to the nearest 100. Source: Urban Institute analysis of 2009 11 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata from the University of Minnesota Integrated Public Use Microdata Series. 7