Purchasing Chief Fiscal Officer Purchasing

Similar documents
2013 Approved General Government Operating Budget. Municipality of Anchorage. Purchasing 23-1

Public Works Administration

2016 Approved General Government Operating Budget. Internal Audit. Internal Audit IA - 1

Chief Fiscal Officer

Chief Fiscal Officer

Traffic Municipal Manager Traffic

Traffic Municipal Manager Traffic

Internal Audit. Internal Audit 13-1

2019 Proposed General Government Operating Budget. Assembly. Assembly. Assembly Counsel. Clerk. Ombudsman. Elections ASM - 1

Chief Fiscal Officer

Economic & Community Development

2018 Proposed General Government Operating Budget. Appendix Q. Employee Relations. Police & Fire Retiree Medical Funding Program Q - 1

Public Transportation

Public Transportation

2018 Approved General Government Operating Budget. Appendix Q. Employee Relations. Police & Fire Retiree Medical Funding Program Q - 1

2012 Approved General Government Operating Budget. Assembly. Assembly. Assembly Counsel. Clerk. Ombudsman. Elections 3-1

Public Transportation

2013 Approved General Government Operating Budget. Municipality of Anchorage. Finance 9-1

Municipality of Anchorage. Finance

Public Works. Municipal Manager. Public Works. Maintenance and Operations. Engineering. Communications. Design. Administration.

Assembly. Assembly Assembly Counsel Clerk Ombudsman Elections

Public Transportation

Public Transportation

2013 Proposed General Government Operating Budget GLOSSARY. Glossary - 1

Council Action: Certification of Funds: Creates: A negative fiscal impact in the amount of: $ 314, A positive fiscal impact in the amount of: $

Public Works Proposed General Government Operating Budget. Municipal Manager. Public Works. Maintenance and Operations.

Glossary of Terms. Anchorage Municipal Employee Association, Inc. A change to a budget that is made after the budget has been proposed.

Anchorage Police Department

OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY

Public Works Municipal Manager Public Works Maintenance and Administration Engineering Traffic Operations

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES, COLORADO APPROVING A PURCHASING POLICY

2016 Approved General Government Operating Budget. Assembly. Assembly. Assembly Counsel. Clerk. Ombudsman. Elections ASM - 1

2018 Approved General Government Operating Budget. Assembly. Assembly. Assembly Counsel. Clerk. Ombudsman. Elections ASM - 1

Maintenance and Operations

GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET

Anchorage Fire Department

CAR 7-1 PURCHASING REGULATION CAR 7-1 OPR: Finance 4/90 (Revised 2/10)

Anchorage Water & Wastewater Utility

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PROCUREMENT THRESHOLDS AND PROCEDURES...

City of Charlotte Uniform Guidance Procurement Policy

CROW WING COUNTY BRAINERD, MINNESOTA

Calleguas Municipal Water District Procurement Policy

Anchorage Fire Department

In short, the 2019 Proposed Budget addresses our current responsibilities and paves the way to a strong, sustainable fiscal future for the MOA.

OFFICE OF PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS

FINANCE. Executive Manager. Finance. Administration. Treasury Treasury Administration Cash Management Delinquent Collections 1345

Management & Budget Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TRASH AND RECYCLABLES COLLECTION CITY OF JONESVILLE, MICHIGAN

IMPORTANT FACTS ABOUT PUBLIC PROJECTS UNDER IOWA LAW

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Addendum No. 2 Q&A Responses ADDENDUM NO. 2. State of Florida Department of Management Services

4.11 Procurement Procedures with Federal Funds

Purchasing Policies and Procedures

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

SECTION II: PURCHASING POLICY & CONTRACTS

FEDERAL GRANT ADMINISTRATION PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES Regulation Code: 8305

CALIFORNIA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Webinar 1 - Financial Management

Municipal Budget Process

Chapter 3.24 PURCHASING PROCEDURES

Core Principles of Financial Management. Webinar 1

STAFF REPORT. March 30, Audit Committee. Audit Recommendations Follow-up. Purpose:

CITY OF MADISON 2017 OPERATING BUDGET Agency Request

IV. Orders, Quotations, Bids and Request for Proposal (RFP) Requirements

Anchorage Police Department

CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. Operating Procedures. Pursuant To. Section of the Connecticut General Statutes

Improving the Procurement Process Unbalanced Bids

To establish NUAMES policy and procedure governing the initiation, authorization, and review of all expenditures of the school.

CITY OF TACOMA SMALL WORKS ROSTER PROGRAM FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTS

This project is subject to Title 49, Part 26.13(b), Code of Federal Regulations [49 CFR 26.13(b)]:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL BROKERAGE SERVICES FOR HEALTH INSURANCE AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS. A Direct Cost by Expenditure Type A-1. B Overhead Charges by Fund B-1

TOWN OF PALM BEACH Town Manager s Office

Policy Statement. The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for purchasing services.

PROCUREMENT PLAN FOR CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS

FISCAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PREPARATION

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN CONTRACTOR: ADDRESS: DUNN & BRADSTREET NUMBER: SOLICITATION OR CONTRACT NUMBER: ITEM/SERVICE (Description):

The MOA will continue its discussion with the Anchorage School District to develop a shared services program.

INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT

Quote A written or verbal price a supplier can provide for material or services for a specified period of time.

Appendix T. Financial Policies

Procurements by states General procurement standards.

This project is subject to Title 49, Part 26.13(b), Code of Federal Regulations [49 CFR 26.13(b)]:

Lexington Center Corporation. Purchasing Policy & Procedures

ASD INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT

The Redevelopment Authority of the City of York. Request for Proposals (RFP) Accounting and Fiscal Management Services

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL PALM BEACH COUNTY

CONTRACTING - BID LAWS

Department of Natural Resources. VENDOR: Name: Address: Phone #: Address: Contact Name: Contact Vendor #:

Federal and State Grant Procurements. Procurement and Contracts Division

SOUTH CAROLINA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Land Surveying Services for Airport Development IDC State Project #U30-D008-MJ

MATRIX OF STRATEGIC VISION AND ACTIONS TO SUPPORT SUSTAINABLE CITIES

GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET

These regulations are issued pursuant to the following Sections of the Municipal Code of Chicago:

SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 12/ LR APPROVED SURVEYOR LIST. Table of Contents

The Procurement Paw. Presented by: Clint Everhart, CPA Senior Manager

Cash Disbursement Policy

POLICY TITLE: Purchasing District Purchasing POLICY NO: 850 PAGE 1 of 11 PURCHASING POLICY 1 - DISTRICT PURCHASING

MOJAVE WATER AGENCY PURCHASING POLICY

August 2, 2017 Illinois State Board of Education. Conference

Transcription:

Chief Fiscal Officer PUR - 1

Description The Department is the office responsible for the acquisition of supplies, services, and construction supporting the operations of the Municipality. The Department is the entity within the Municipality authorized to issue Invitations to Bid and Requests for Proposals. The Department issues purchase orders, and contracts to acquire supplies and services. The Department also disposes of all municipal surplus property and equipment. The Department is conscious of its responsibility and accountability in the expenditure of public funds. Therefore, the Department maintains a competitive bidding process in accordance with Federal and State laws, regulations, and Municipal ordinances. It is the Department's policy to encourage the participation of qualified vendors in the bidding process, emphasizing opportunities for small businesses and disadvantaged and women owned businesses. Preference may be given to local bidders when not prohibited by the funding source. Projects and requirements for the Municipality vary widely and as a result, rely heavily upon the local business and contractor community to meet its needs. We encourage the local contractor community to participate in the various solicitation processes offered. A local bidder's preference is applied for these local businesses & contractors residing within the corporate boundaries of the Municipality. The use of minority and women owned businesses is encouraged, and participation goals for sub-contracting may be required depending on the source of funding. Department Goals Provide departments with the knowledge needed to successfully procure items/services at the best value for the City with minimal difficulty (standardize and streamline processes) Ensure that procurements are made in compliance with all laws and policies Provide contract administration training to departments Continually explore alternative procurement methods Minimize Appeals Department Goals that Contribute to Achieving the Mayor s Mission: Administration Make city government more efficient, accessible, transparent, and responsive Provide departments with the knowledge needed to successfully procure items/services at the best value for the City with minimal difficulty (standardize and streamline processes). Ensure that procurements are made in compliance with all laws and policies Provide contract administration training to departments. Provide training to departments on the purchasing processes. Continue to work with and explore alternative procurement methods when contracting situations would benefit from their use. PUR - 2

Department Summary 2017 Actuals 2018 Revised 2019 Proposed 19 v 18 % Chg Direct Cost by Division 1,703,599 1,717,336 1,797,522 4.67% Direct Cost Total 1,703,599 1,717,336 1,797,522 4.67% Intragovernmental Charges Charges by/to Other Departments (1,184,318) (1,447,841) (1,528,025) 5.54% Function Cost Total 519,281 269,495 269,497 - Program Generated Revenue (579,942) (269,500) (269,500) - Net Cost Total (60,661) (5) (3) (33.73%) Direct Cost by Category Salaries and Benefits 1,514,127 1,625,769 1,705,955 4.93% Supplies 5,153 5,964 5,964 - Travel 2,053 - - - Contractual/OtherServices 182,267 85,603 85,603 - Debt Service - - - - Direct Cost Total 1,703,599 1,717,336 1,797,522 4.67% Position Summary as Budgeted Full-Time 15 13 13 - Part-Time - - - - Position Total 15 13 13-2017 Positions: end-of-year count is 14 due to 1 FT position being eliminated July 1, 2017 due to SAP go-live. PUR - 3

Reconciliation from 2018 Revised Budget to 2019 Proposed Budget Positions Direct Costs FT PT Seas/T 2018 Revised Budget 1,717,336 13 - - Changes in Existing Programs/Funding for 2019 - Salaries and benefits adjustments 40,186 - - - 2019 Continuation Level 1,757,522 13 - - 2019 One-Time Requirements - Add funding for long-term employee retirement leave cash-out 40,000 - - - 2019 Proposed Budget 1,797,522 13 - - PUR - 4

Division Summary (Fund Center # 138100, 138179) 2017 Actuals 2018 Revised 2019 Proposed 19 v 18 % Chg Direct Cost by Category Salaries and Benefits 1,514,127 1,625,769 1,705,955 4.93% Supplies 5,153 5,964 5,964 - Travel 2,053 - - - Contractual/Other Services 182,267 85,603 85,603 - Manageable Direct Cost Total 1,703,599 1,717,336 1,797,522 4.67% Debt Service - - - - Non-Manageable Direct Cost Total - - - - Direct Cost Total 1,703,599 1,717,336 1,797,522 - Intragovernmental Charges Charges by/to Other Departments (1,184,318) (1,447,841) (1,528,025) 5.54% Function Cost Total 519,281 269,495 269,497 - Program Generated Revenue by Fund Fund 101000 - Areawide General 579,942 269,500 269,500 - Program Generated Revenue Total 579,942 269,500 269,500 - Net Cost Total (60,661) (5) (3) (33.73%) Position Summary as Budgeted Full-Time 15 13 13 - Position Total 15 13 13-2017 Positions: end-of-year count is 14 due to 1 FT position being eliminated July 1, 2017 due to SAP go-live. PUR - 5

Direct Cost by Category Net Cost Division Detail (Fund Center # 138100, 138179) 2017 Actuals 2018 Revised 2019 Proposed 19 v 18 % Chg Salaries and Benefits 1,514,127 1,625,769 1,705,955 4.93% Supplies 5,153 5,964 5,964 - Travel 2,053 - - - Contractual/Other Services 182,267 85,603 85,603 - Manageable Direct Cost Total 1,703,599 1,717,336 1,797,522 4.67% Debt Service - - - - Non-Manageable Direct Cost Total - - - - Intragovernmental Charges Direct Cost Total 1,703,599 1,717,336 1,797,522 4.67% Charges by/to Other Departments (1,184,318) (1,447,841) (1,528,025) 5.54% Program Generated Revenue 406625 - Reimbursed Cost-NonGrant Funded 333,907 105,000 105,000-408570 - Sale of Contractor Specifications 9,118 4,500 4,500-408580 - Miscellaneous Revenues 236,917 160,000 160,000 - Program Generated Revenue Total 579,942 269,500 269,500 - Direct Cost Total 1,703,599 1,717,336 1,797,522 4.67% Charges by/to Other Departments Total (1,184,318) (1,447,841) (1,528,025) 5.54% Program Generated Revenue Total (579,942) (269,500) (269,500) - Net Cost Total (60,661) (5) (3) (33.73%) Position Detail as Budgeted 2017 Revised 2018 Revised 2019 Proposed Full Time Part Time Full Time Part Time Full Time Part Time Administrative Coordinator 1-1 - 1 - Administrative Officer 3-2 - 2 - Deputy Officer 2-2 - 2 - Director 1-1 - - - Junior Administrative Officer 2-2 - 2 - Office Associate 1 - - - - - Principal Admin Officer 2-2 - 2 - Director - - - - 1 - Senior Administrative Officer 2-2 - 2 - Senior Office Associate 1-1 - 1 - Position Detail as Budgeted Total 15-13 - 13-2017 Positions: end-of-year count is 14 due to 1 FT position being eliminated July 1, 2017 due to SAP go-live. PUR - 6

Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results PUR - 7

Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results Measure #1: Cost to provide efficient purchasing services as a percent of total MOA purchases and compare to national benchmarks: 2015--.4% 2016--.1% 2017--.1% 2018--.2% Benchmark: Below 1% Measure #2: Number of formal protests sent to Bidding Review Board (BRB) 2015-1 (Solid Waste Service Garbage Trucks) 2016 1 - (Upper O Malley LRSA) 2017 0 2018 1 (Asplund Wastewater Treatment Facility Process and Facility Improvements) Goal: O Measure #3: Expenditures in the local area 2015-57% (this remains artificially low due to the ML&P power plant contract and other specialized contracts not available from in state sources. Without these actions, the instate % is 86%) 2016-41% (this remains artificially low due to the ML&P power plant contract and other specialized contracts not available from in state sources. Without these actions, the instate % is 79%) 2017 65% (this remains artificially low due to the ML&P power plant contract and other specialized contracts not available from in state sources. Without these actions, the instate % is 68%) 2018 Waiting on SAP report to accurately disclose expenditure information No formal Goal but matter of local interest PUR - 8