BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION

Similar documents
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY ELANA FOLEY SENIOR RATE CASE ANALYST

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

FLED D I RECTOR OF THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

APSC FILED Time: 5/18/2017 2:32:41 PM: Recvd 5/18/2017 2:32:37 PM: Docket U-Doc. 200 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ORDER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY BARBARA L. CASEY MANAGER, REGULATORY FILINGS ENTERGY SERVICES, INC.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DIRECT TESTIMONY LOVITA GRIFFIN, EEP RATE ANALYST

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE ANNUAL DETERMINATION OF THE INTEREST. 3URL C, ROTENBERRY, Administrative Law Judge

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS

Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-1) Decoupling

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT OF DAVID E. DISMUKES, PH.D. ON BEHALF OF

RR16 - Page 1 of

KEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS March 17, 2014

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044

Exhibit A Affidavit of Alan Varvis

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

RR1 - Page 181 of 518

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. State of Minnesota

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

STATE OF ALASKA. Kate Giard Paul F. Lisankie T.W. Patch Janis W. Wilson

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF TH M E Q ~R 13 2C0 9 STATE OF OKLAHOMA COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - Gh;C CORPQRAT;ON C:J;,' ;::t!;~,tliij OF OKLAHOM A

Investor Update MARCH 2019

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding

I c*- 1 DOCKET NO U APPROVAL OF CHANGES IN RATES FOR RETAIL ELECTRIC SERVICE OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR DIRECT TESTIMONY

Board of Public Utilities Prepared Testimony of Lori Austin September, 2010

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

2015 General Rate Case

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF AMANDA D. WHITE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

January 30, Southern Company Services, Inc., Docket No. ER15- Filing of Updated Depreciation Rates for Mississippi Power Company

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

APSC FILED Time: 9/24/2015 9:01:10 AM: Recvd 9/24/2015 9:01:04 AM: Docket u-Doc. 104 ORDER

Department of Finance Post Office Box 3278 and Administration

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN WALLACH

Exhibit SCE-1

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH,

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA. on behalf of.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

165 FERC 61,140 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ACCEPTING COMPLIANCE FILING SUBJECT TO CONDITION

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION TODD EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Duke Energy South Bay, LLC ) Docket No. ER

---! FD IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) BEFORE THE 65

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.

2003 Management s Discussion and Analysis

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY MELISSA L. OSTROM.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY GREGORY R. ZAKRZEWSKI REGULATORY PROJECT COORDINATOR, REGULATORY ACCOUNTING

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PREPARED TESTIMONY DON MALONE PUBLIC UTILITY AUDITOR ON BEHALF OF THE STAFF OF THE

ORDER. On June 1, 2015, the General Staff (Staff) of the Arkansas Public Service

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-2) Decoupling and Sales True-Up

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main

MARK E. GARRETT ON BEHALF OF AND. May 2, 2018

Control Number : Item Number: Addendum StartPage: 0

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) NON-PROTECTED SURREBUTTAL EXHIBITS JEFF HILTON DIRECTOR OF REVENUE REQUIREMENTS

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

RR9 - Page 356 of 510

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Overview of Formula Rates in 7 States

Earnings Conference Call Fourth Quarter 2018 February 21, 2019

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. The following Commissioners participated in the disposition of this matter:

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG LIBERTY UTILITIES (ENERGYNORTH NATURAL GAS) CORP. d/b/a LIBERTY UTILITIES

BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward

STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANTE MUGRACE ON BEHALF OF THE DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE ATTORNEY GENERAL. June 5, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 600 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. 8 Proceedings held in the above-entitled. 9 matter before Sharon L. Feldman, Administrative Law Judge

BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 600 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

Transcription:

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SEEKING A DECLARATORY ORDER FINDING ITS MUSTANG GENERATION PLANT MODERNIZATION PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION ON BEHALF OF THE GENERAL STAFF OF THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION NOVEMBER, 0 - -

0 0 INTRODUCTION Q. Please state your name and business address. A. My name is Regina L. Butler and my business address is Arkansas Public Service Commission (Commission, 000 Center Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 0. Q. By whom are you employed and in what capacity? A. I am currently employed by the Commission s General Staff (Staff as Director of the Electric Section. In that capacity, I am responsible for coordination and development of Staff s case in electric utility filings, including rate cases, certificate cases, rulemakings, and tariffs. I analyze utility company filings, identify and evaluate issues, develop positions on those issues and present those positions, when necessary, in written and oral testimony before the Commission. Q. Please state your qualifications and background. A. I have more than twenty-seven years of experience in utility accounting and regulation. I was employed by Entergy Services, Inc., for more than five years and served as an Accountant in Property Accounting and General Accounting. I was employed by Alltel Communications, Inc., for nine years and served in various capacities, including Supervisor in General Accounting and Revenue Analyst in Revenue Assurance. I joined Staff in April 00 as a Rate Analyst. In June 00, I was promoted to Audit Supervisor. In October 00, I was - -

0 promoted to Senior Rate Case Analyst. In October 0, I was promoted to my current position. My educational qualifications include a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from the University of Central Arkansas and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. I am a Certified Public Accountant licensed to practice in Arkansas. Since joining Staff, I have received specialized training, including the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Annual Regulatory Studies Program at Michigan State University. I have previously presented testimony before the Commission concerning various ratemaking, revenue requirement, and policy issues for electric utilities. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY Q. What is the purpose of your testimony? A. I address the Application Seeking a Declaratory Order Finding its Mustang Generation Plant Modernization Plan is Consistent with The Public Interest (Application filed by Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (OG&E or Company on August, 0. Specifically, I address cost recovery issues associated with the Mustang Plant as described in the Direct Testimony of Company witness Donald Rowlett. Staff witness Clark Cotten addresses the need for the proposed facilities. Staff witness Gerrilynn Wolfe addresses OG&E s proposed 0 depreciation rates for the Mustang Plant. - -

COST RECOVERY Q. How does OG&E propose to recover the costs associated with its Mustang Modernization Plan? A. OG&E proposes to seek recovery of the new Mustang combustion turbines (CTs through its Formula Rate Plan Rider (Rider FRP approved in Docket No. - 0-U. OG&E s first filing under Rider FRP will be made in October 0 and 0 will include the projected year of April, 0 through March, 00. Q. Did OG&E estimate the revenue requirement for the Mustang Plant? A. Yes. Based on the estimated total cost of $0 million, OG&E witness Rowlett provided an estimated Arkansas-jurisdictional revenue requirement of $. million for the term of the Company s first Rider FRP filing. Q. Do you agree with this estimate? A. I agree that the method OG&E used to calculate the estimated revenue requirement is consistent with the requirements of Rider FRP. However, I have calculated an estimated Arkansas-jurisdictional revenue requirement of $. million by applying Staff witness Wolfe s proposed depreciation rates to the Company s most recent estimate of the total capitalized costs for the Mustang Plant by FERC account. The actual revenue requirement to be recovered will be reviewed in OG&E s October 0 Rider FRP filing. Because the project will be Direct Testimony of Donald Rowlett, p., lines -. Id. at lines -. - -

completed and final costs will be known at the time of the Company s first Rider FRP filing, actual costs will be reflected at the time of the filing. Q. Are there any issues associated with OG&E s request related to the Mustang Plant? A. Yes. Company witness Rowlett describes two issues associated with OG&E s decision to construct the Mustang Plant that must be addressed. First, Mr. Rowlett acknowledges that OG&E has failed to comply with Ark. Code Ann. - -0 which requires the Company to obtain the express written approval of the Commission prior to commencing construction of generating facilities outside of 0 the state. Second, OG&E did not comply with Section. of the Commission s 0 Resource Planning Guidelines for Electric Utilities (Resource Planning Guidelines, which requires a self-build option to be compared to market opportunities identified through a competitive bidding process. According to Mr. Rowlett, the Company did not conduct a competitive bidding process for the capacity that would be needed after the retirement of the old Mustang units because the Company had investigated other existing generation in and around OG&E s service territory and determined that none of those alternatives were available in 0 or consistent with the Company s needs. Q. Are you recommending an adjustment due to OG&E s failure to comply with the requirements of Ark. Code Ann. --0? Id. at lines -. Id. at, lines -. Id. at, line -0. - -

0 A. Yes. Ark. Code Ann. --0(c states that failure to comply with the requirements of this section shall constitute grounds for disallowance of all of the costs and expenses associated with the facility. Because Staff witness Cotten has found that constructing the new generation facilities at the Mustang Plant is in the public interest, I do not recommend a disallowance of the entire investment in the seven new CTs at the Mustang Plant. However, an adjustment is warranted due to OG&E s failure to comply with the requirements of Ark. Code Ann. --0. In lieu of a disallowance of the entire investment in the seven new CTs at the Mustang Plant, I recommend a downward adjustment to the amount OG&E is allowed to recover in rates. Specifically, I recommend that the Commission implement this adjustment by requiring OG&E to credit Arkansas ratepayers $00,000 annually for four years for a total of $. million. The effect of this adjustment is to the recovery of the revenue requirement associated with the seven CTs installed at the Mustang Plant from OG&E s ratepayers during the first four year of those units operation. Although I am not recommending the downward adjustment on this basis, I provide the following solely for the purpose of demonstrating the order of magnitude. The $00,000 credit to Arkansas 0 customers is comparable in effect to reducing OG&E s authorized return on equity on OG&E s investment in the seven new CTs located at the Mustang Plant by 0 basis points. The downward adjustment I recommend is based solely on OG&E s failure to comply with Ark. Code Ann. --0. The parties can - -

0 address the mechanism through which this bill credit will flow to OG&E s ratepayers in subsequent filings in this docket. RECOMMENDATIONS Q. Please summarize your recommendations. A. I recommend that recovery of the revenue requirement for the seven CTs installed at the Mustang Plant be addressed in OG&E s Rider FRP. Due to OG&E s failure to comply with the requirements of Ark. Code Ann. --0. I also recommend that OG&E be required to credit Arkansas ratepayers $00,000 annually for four years for a total of $. million as discussed herein. Q. Does this conclude your testimony? A. Yes, it does. - -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on all parties of record by electronic mail via the Electronic Filing System this th day of November, 0. /s/ Justin A. Hinton Justin A. Hinton - -