SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Similar documents
SAN JOSH CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY F/ZZ/IL. Memorandum. FROM: Kim Walesh Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

Memorandum SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY. FROM: Julia H. Cooper Julie Edmonds-Mares TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PROJECT COMPLETION AGREEMENT WITH CMK, LLC (DBA BAPC, LLC)

(b) Approve a ten percent contingency in the amount of $304,024; and

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION AND MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE OUTREACH PLAN

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

ACTIONS RELATED TO THE RECYCLE PLUS RATES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY SERVICES

SUBJECT: CITY OF SAN JOSE DATE: June 5, TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE

Memorandum \[\<<\\* /7/ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Barry Ng Jennifer A. Maguire

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND. FROM: Toni J. Taber, CM1 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: November 5, Approval of Adjusted Campaign Contribution Limits.

RESOLUTION NO

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Carla Hansen, Management Analyst II Peggy Flynn, Public Communications Coordinator Cathy Capriola, Assistant City Manager

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: October 27, 2016

1. Accept staff report on the updated study of cost of service to provide potable water to San Jose Municipal Water System (SJMWS) customers; and

To approve and provide input on key start-up activities toward a targeted April 2018 launch for the first phase of San Jose Clean Energy customers.

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

San Jose Downtown Association. Financial Statements

REPORT ON RFP AND ACTIONS RELATED TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES

CITY OF CARPINTERIA Downtown-T Business Advisory Board Special Meeting Agenda Thursday, March 14, :00 am

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

zst FROM: Kip Harkness Kim Walesh Margaret McCahan TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 19,2018 Approved g (_ Date

City Council Agenda Report October 16, 2018

SANJOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

ACTIONS RELATED TO BOARD OF FAIR CAMPAIGN AND POLITICAL PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE CITY'S GIFT ORDINANCE UNDER TITLE 12.

Memorandum SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Barry Ng

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS FOR REVENUE ENHANCEMENT SERVICES RELATING TO SALES AND USE TAX, TELEPHONE LINE TAX, UTILITY USERS TAX AND FRANCHISE FEES.

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: May 5, 2016

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY

SUBJECT: SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE FY ANNUAL ACTION PLAN

Approve the following amendments to the Proposed Operating Budget and the Capital Improvement Program:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Michael Caplan, Manager, Office of Economic Development

Accept the report on the status of the development of the proposed citywide Softball facility.

OPERATING PLAN FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2016 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF WAUSAU, WISCONSIN

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA. ivt

SUBJECT: AUDIT OF TEAM SAN JOSE'S PERFORMANCE

3 Resolution of Formation: Establishing a business-basedbusiness improvement

GREAT OAKS WATER COMPANY

CITY COUNCIL NEW BUSINESS MAY 18, 2015

WHEREAS, after due notice, the City Planning Commission and the City Council did conduct public hearings on this matter; and,

City of Los Angeles OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Memorandum. Adopt a resolution:

ORDINANCE NO

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: March 23, 2017

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION (A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation) *** FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Office Hours, Scheduling Appointments, Attorney Fees, Directions to Office and Courts, Office Parking, and Other Office Services and Information

CITY COUNCIL. c-r. Agenda Item No.: Date : July 14, Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council TO:

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

City and County of San Francisco

GREAT OAKS WATER COMPANY

Memorandum. FROM: Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. SUBJECT: BANKING SERVICES REP DATE: June 23, 2017 REASON FOR ADDENDUM

Ordinance No

City of Grand Island Tuesday, July 25, 2017 Council Session

SAN JOSE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION (A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation) *** FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

AGENDA. A.) CALL TO ORDER Current SEDA Chair, VanGordon. B.) ROLL CALL Staff 2 minutes. C.) ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chair 3 minutes

OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY COUNCIL Quasi-Judicial Matter

Report to the City Council

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF MULTIPLE SERIES OF. TAX ALLOCATION REFUNDING BONDS AND RELATED BOND DOCUMENTS

SUBJECT: CITY OF SAN JOSE'S DATE: February 6, 2017 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

San Jose Water Company

Orchard Hill Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No Fiscal Year 2018/19 Engineer s Report

WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT

GREAT OAKS WATER COMPANY

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

COMMITTEE SESSION ************************************************************** ************************************************************* AGENDA

Heather Hafer, Senior Management Analyst Kate Whan, Public Works Administrative Manager SAN PABLO SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT A-03

A Resolution. Apral the Crty Council received a petition for the reestablishment of Fort Worth Public Improvement Distract No 1 ( the "PID")

building will provide space for a concession stand, storage and a second restroom facility to serve the park.

ORDINANCE NO

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Toni J. Taber, C City Clerk SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: October 13, 2016

CITY OF LOS ANGELES. June 23, Honorable Members of the City Council City Hall, Room North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012

AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL OF A CORRESPONDING CHANGE PURCHASE ORDER TO ZAHRA FARIMANI DBA ZF ALEXANDER, INC. FOR THESE SERVICES

AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: February 20, 2018 Item Number: D 14 To: From:

ORDINANCE NO. CID-3193

SUBJECT: BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION DATE: July 29, 2016

Friday, September 23, Post Council Debrief. Budget Highlight Legislative Reserve Funds

1898-W Rule No. 15 Main Extensions (Continued) 993-W 1899-W Table of Contents (Continued) 1780-W 1900-W Table of Contents 1897-W

Calcasieu Parish Recording Page

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT LONG RANGE CAPITAL FUNDING OPTIONS:

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

NAPA VALLEY TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLAN

FLAGSTAFF DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AND REVITALIZATION DISTRICT OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA RESOLUTION NO

NOTICE AND CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE KERMAN CITY COUNCIL. The sole business to be conducted is as follows:

REVISED Supplemental Agenda

Request for Proposal

Cottonwood Park Subdivision Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No Fiscal Year 2018/19 Engineer s Report

CITY OF ROCK ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. O AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROCK ISLAND, ROCK ISLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION FI

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

TEAM SAN JOSE PERFORMANCE

CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION TRANSMITTAL April 7, Proceeds from Sale of Parkland... 4 Public Art Program... 5

Transcription:

CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW Approved COUNCIL AGENDA: 06/28/16 ITEM: ^ Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh DATE: June 6, 2016 Date COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE 2016-2017 BUDGET REPORT, TO LEVY DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 AND TO SUSPEND THE COLLECTION OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR BUSINESSES THAT QUALIFY FOR THE BUSINESS TAX FINANCIAL HARDSHIP EXEMPTION UNDER THE CITY'S GENERAL BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION Conduct a Public Hearing and adopt a resolution to approve the Downtown Business Improvement District budget report for fiscal year 2016-2017, as filed or modified by Council, to levy the Downtown BID assessments for 2016-2017, and to suspend collection of the Downtown BID assessments for the businesses that qualify for the business tax financial hardship exemption under the City's general business tax ordinance. OUTCOME Approval of this action will result in the levy of assessments for the upcoming fiscal year of the Downtown Business Improvement District and will exempt businesses from the Downtown BID assessments, if they qualify for a financial hardship exemption under the City's general business tax ordinance. BACKGROUND The Downtown Business Improvement District ("BID") was established by Council in 1988 pursuant to the California Parking and Business Improvement Area Law ("BID Law") to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of the Downtown Business

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL June 6, 2016 Subject: Approval of 2016-2017 Budget Report - Downtown BID Page 2 District. In 1989, Council appointed the Downtown Association as the Advisory Board ("Advisory Board") for the BID, to advise Council on the levy of assessments in the BID and the expenditure of revenues derived from the assessments for the benefit of the BID. Pursuant to BID Law, an annual public hearing is required in order to approve the annual budget report and levy the annual BID assessments. On June 14, 2016, the Council set June 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. as the date and time for the public hearing on the proposed 2016-2017 assessments. On June 14, 2016, the Council preliminarily approved the 2016-2017 budget report as filed by the Advisory Board or as modified by the City Council and adopted a resolution of intention to levy the annual assessments for fiscal year 2016-2017 in the BID. The 2016-2017 budget report submitted to the Council on June 14, 2016 is attached to this memo as Exhibit 1. As part of its annual budget report, the Advisory Board is recommending that the Downtown BID assessments be suspended for those businesses that qualify for a financial hardship exemption under the City's general business tax as set forth in Section 4.76.345 (Financial hardship exemption) of the Municipal Code. In order to qualify, the business must be a sole proprietorship which means a business owned and operated by one person or owned and operated jointly by a husband and wife or domestic partners, without other principals or employees, where its gross receipts do not exceed the poverty level established by the Department of Health and Human Services for a single person (multiplied by 2) for the calendar year in which the assessment is due. It is anticipated that the impact to City Finance's collection efforts of the Downtown BID will be negligible because of the small segment of downtown businesses likely to apply and be eligible for the financial hardship program. ANALYSIS When a hearing is held under BID Law with regard to the levy of assessments of a BID, the City Council shall hear and consider all protests against the continued authorization of the BID, the extent of the area, the assessments, or the furnishing of specified types of improvements or activities. Protests may be made orally or in writing. Written protests must be filed with the City Clerk at or before the time fixed for the public hearing. BID Law requires that the proceedings shall terminate if protests are made in writing against the continued authorization of the BID by businesses or property owners in the proposed district that will pay a majority of the charges to be assessed. If the majority protest is only against the furnishing of a specified type or types of improvement or activity within the area, those improvements or activities shall be eliminated. The Advisory Board has prepared a budget report ("report") attached as Exhibit 1, for Council's consideration as the proposed budget for the Downtown BID for Fiscal Year 2016-2017. As required by BID Law, the report has been filed with the City Clerk and contains, among other things, a list of the improvements and activities proposed to be provided in the BID in Fiscal

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL June 6.2016 Subject: Approval of 2016-2017 Budget Report - Downtown BID Page 3 Year 2016-2017, an estimate of the cost of providing the improvements and activities, and a recommendation to suspend the collection of the Downtown BID where a business qualifies for a financial hardship exemption under the City's general business tax ordinance. The Advisory Board has recommended no change to the BID boundaries or to the method and basis for levying assessments (other than to recommend suspending the collection of the Downtown BID assessments in certain instances where financial hardship is sufficiently demonstrated). Therefore, the proposed assessments in the BID for Fiscal Year 2016-2017, unless otherwise noted, are the same as the assessments for Fiscal Year 2015-2016. During the course or upon the conclusion of the public hearing the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the Advisory Board's report. At the conclusion of the public hearing the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the report as originally filed or as modified by the Council. The adoption of the resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the fiscal year 2016-2017 and suspension of the BID assessments in certain instances as noted above. EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP The Advisory Board will come before Council next year to present a report that proposes a budget for the 2017-2018 fiscal year. PUBLIC OUTREACH In accordance with the BID Law, the City Clerk has published the required legal notice with regard to the levy of assessments for fiscal year 2016-2017. The budget for Fiscal Year 2016 2017 was reviewed and approved at the Advisory Board's meeting on April 14, 2016. This memorandum will be posted on the City's website for the June 28, 2016 City Council agenda. COORDINATION This memorandum has been coordinated with the City Attorney's Office, the Finance Department, Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, the City Manager's Budget Office, the Downtown Business & Professional Association, and the City Clerk's Office. FISCAL/POLICY ALIGNMENT This action is consistent with the Economic Development Strategy approved by Council, specifically Initiative No. 1, "Encourage Companies and Sectors that Can Drive the San

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL _Iune_6,_20J.6 Subject: Approval of 2016-2017 Budget Report - Downtown BID Page 4 Jose/Silicon Valley Economy and Generate Revenue for City Services and Infrastructure" and Initiative No. 10, "Continue to Position Downtown as Silicon Valley's City Center." A healthy Business Improvement District will encourage growth of the retail community and consequently result in additional sales tax revenue for the City. COST SUMMARY/IMPLICATIONS Adoption of the proposed Downtown BID budget does not impact City revenue. The Downtown BID assessments are restricted for use exclusively by the Downtown BID. It is anticipated that a healthy Downtown Business Improvement District will encourage growth of the retail community and consequently result in additional business tax and sales tax revenue for the City. It is anticipated that the impact of the financial hardship exemption to Finance's collection efforts of the BID assessments will be negligible because of the small segment of downtown businesses likely to apply and be eligible for the financial hardship program. CEOA Exempt, File No.PP08-048. /s/. KIM WALESH Deputy City Manager Director of Economic Development For questions, please contact Sal Alvarez, Executive Analyst, at (408) 793-6943. Attachments

-Apr-i-1 1-4-, 2 016 Exhibit 1 Downtown BID Report for Fiscal Year 2016-17 1. The boundaries of the Downtown BID are as follows: 1-280 at Fourth Street west along- Reed Street to west side of Market Street to south side of Balbach Street to east side of Almaden Boulevard to continue on West Reed Street to Highway 87, Highway 87 north to West San Fernando Street, south side of West San Fernando Street to CalTrain tracks, CalTrain tracks to West Julian Street, south side of West Julian Street east to Montgomery Street, west side of Montgomery Street south to south side of West St. John Street to the Guadalupe River, north along east side of the Guadalupe River to the western most set of Union Pacific Railroad tracks, north side of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks north to West Taylor Street, south side of West Taylor Street east to Coleman Avenue, southwest side of Coleman Avenue east to. Highway 87, Highway 87 south to West Julian Street, both sides of West Julian Street east to First Street, south side of East Julian Street east to Fourth Street, both sides of Fourth Street south back to I- 280. See Exhibit 3. 2. As of July 1, 2014, businesses that are exempt from paying the City's Business Tax under Chapter 4.76 of the San Jose Municipal Code no longer pay the Downtown Business Improvement District assessment fee. If the business qualifies for the hardship exemption for the City of San Jose Business License Tax, the business will automatically qualify for the BID assessment fee waiver. 3. The Downtown BID will assess current year BID charges only when a business within the Downtown BID already in possession of a Business License and already assessed the Business License Tax is discovered to have not been assessed the BID in previous years. 4. Improvements and activities for FY 2016-17: See Exhibit 2 5. An estimate of the total cost of providing the improvements and activities for fiscal year 2016-17 is approximately $3,592,000. Estimated BID funds of $777,000 contribute to total program and staffing costs. Additional costs estimated at $2,815,000 are paid through Downtown Association revenue raised by programs and activities, projected City of San Jose contract services, and other sources. 1

The current -method and basis- fo-r levying- the annual assessment are as follows: CATEGORY PROPOSED RATE I. Retail $29.04 per FTE/$264 min. II. Non-Retail $19.35 per FTE/$185 min. III. Apartments & Hotels $7.92 per room/$264 min. IV. Parking Lots see commercial landlord V. Non-profits $100 VI. Independent Contractors/Rolling Vendors $55 VI. Commercial Landlords/Parking Lots Less than 10,000 square feet $440 10,001 to 50,000 square feet $990 50,001 to 100,000 square feet $1,540 More than 100,000 square feet $2,200 Maximum annual charge in all categories is $6,000. If any single business falls into more than one category, charges are assessed based upon the category producing the highest revenue for the BID. 7. It is estimated that there will be $47,000 carryover in the BID fund from current fiscal year 2015-16. 8. Total Downtown Association program and staffing costs are funded by the following sources of revenue, in addition to assessment district revenue of $777,000: Downtown Association program and activity, expected Office of Economic Development contract services and other revenue sources (estimated): $2,726,000. 2

Downtown Business Improvement District FY 2016-17 Budget Exhibit 2 REVENUE Amount BID FY 2016-17 (Estimated) 730,000 Carryover from FY 2015-16 47,000 Total Revenue $ 777,000 EXPENSE Operating / Administration 210,000 Live and Local campaign 27,000 Ice Rink 100,000 Farmers' Market 45,000 Music in the Park 60,000 Dine Downtown 30,000 Marketing and Advertising 76,000 Communications/Publicity 76,000 Parking Promotions 10,000 District Promotions (SoFA, San Pedro Square, Historic) 15,000 Downtown for the Holidays 20,000 Membership Services 36,000 Planning, Retention & Recruitment 57,000 Partner Programs Public Space Activation 15,000 Total Expenses 777,000 Notes: 1. Program budget are estimates. Additional or unused BID revenue will be applied to similar programs or carry forward into the next year.

W TAYLOR ST^,,,11111- V \ \ -P' % 1 W JOUAN $TjU»«,, *s 5 So m * -Z. - ^5 i* ^ /Ar* to* V «/ & B 9 M a u S SAN JOSE MARKET o* ""'»»««- # CENTER T 5 "f'in# niniiniifwstjohn ST SAP CENTER / = i Si a DOWNTOWN SAN JOSE Z 3 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID) July 2013 Z I lining E JULIAN ST >* : W JULIAN ST SAN PEDRO SQUARE ST JAMES PARK EST JAMES ST EST JOHN ST Exhibit 3 C 0/fi/DON <? STATION FOUNTAIN ALLEY E SANTA CLARA ST CITY HALL '' illiimiiiimiiif W SAN FERNANDO ST CESAR CHAVEZ PARK PASEPOFSAN NIO ESAN FERNANDO ST (LOS cw 0*- VPS QtJ SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY = DISCOVERY S ; MEADOW SOFA DISTRICT E SAN SALVADOR ST,SSIf s E WILLIAM ST I*, "l "nz E REED ST "111 I s & 3