For Discussion at the WG meeting

Similar documents
CONTACT(S) Jelena Voilo

IASB Staff Paper May 2014

Conceptual Framework Project Update

Issues Paper for Conceptual Framework Working Group

Conceptual Framework December 2013 IPSASB

Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Outreach event Oslo 16 September 2015

ICAP COMMENTS ON IASB DISCUSSION PAPER ON CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

KEY FEATURES OF THE NEW IFRS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Misunderstandings about the IASB s conceptual framework project

Comments on the Discussion Paper A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Conceptual Framework (Revised) Issued June Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting 2018

IFRS News. Special Edition

Accounting Standards Advisory Forum The Conceptual Framework September 2016 The Linkage between Financial Performance and Measurement

AOSSG comments on IASB Exposure Draft ED2015/3 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH

Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

AOSSG comments on IASB Exposure Draft ED/2015/8 IFRS Practice Statement: Application of Materiality to Financial Statements

Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. 24 November Dear Hans

COUNCIL OF AUDITORS GENERAL. IASB Discussion Paper DP/2013/1 - A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom.

IASB Discussion Paper of A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

IFRS Conceptual Framework Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

PAAB SUBMISSION ON ED 2015/7- CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

Rio de Janeiro, January 14, 2014 CONTABILIDADE 0006/2014

Insurance Europe comments on the Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.

Exposure Draft ED/2015/3: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting Exposure Draft ED/2015/4: Updating References to the Conceptual Framework

AOSSG comments on IASB Exposure Draft ED/2014/4 Measuring Quoted Investments in Subsidiaries, Joint Ventures and Associates at Fair Value

Discussion Paper DP/2013/1 A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Applying IFRS. IASB issues revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. April 2018

AOSSG comments on IASB Discussion Paper DP/2013/1 A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

CHAPTER TWO Concepts and principles

Identification, Description and Classification of Measurement Bases

Framework sets out agreed concepts that underlie financial reporting Objective, qualitative characteristics, element definitions,

New Zealand Equivalent to the IASB Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (2018 NZ Conceptual Framework)

CHAPTER 2 THE FRAMEWORK OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD (IASB) INTRODUCTION

RESPONSE TO DISCUSSION PAPER ON A REVIEW OF THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Latest Progress of the Conceptual Framework

Date: 17 November2015 * * ESMAJ2O15/1 734 ***

Submitted electronically through the IFRS Foundation website (

Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. To: Date: 14 January 2014

Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom

Re: IASB Discussion Paper A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

AOSSG comments on IASB Exposure Draft ED/2013/10 Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements

Comments on the International Accounting Standards Board s Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Conceptual Framework 26 July 2013

The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

28 September Russell G. Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, Connecticut

Conceptual Framework. December Profit or Loss/OCI. This paper has been prepared by the ASBJ for the December 2013 ASAF meeting.

A OSSG Comments on I ASB Request for Information Comprehensive Review of the I F RS for SM Es

Welcome to the October IASB Update

Our Comments on IASB Discussion Paper A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Other Comprehensive Income: A New Concept in India

DATE ISSUED IASB AcSB

IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts Phase II Revised ED. Interim AOSSG Meeting 22 September 2013, London Agenda paper 6.1

Comment Letter on the Discussion Paper: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

REVIEW OF THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK IASB DISCUSSION PAPER INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING BULLETIN 2013/18

EQUITY INSTRUMENTS - IMPAIRMENT AND RECYCLING EFRAG DISCUSSION PAPER MARCH 2018

Conceptual Framework Elements of financial statements definitions and recognition

Accounting Standards Advisory Forum Insurance Contracts March 2015 Insurance Contracts: Use of OCI for Presentation of Unearned Profits

STAFF PAPER. IASB Agenda ref. October IASB Meeting Conceptual Framework Paper topic Sweep issue: a flowchart for Chapter 1.

Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements

International Financial Reporting Standards Der 16. IFRS Kongress 2017 in Berlin Better Communication and Conceptual Framework

The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

FEDERATION BANCAIRE FRANCAISE

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL REPORTING BY PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES: ELEMENTS AND RECOGNITION IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

IFRS update Israel December 2013

PUBLIC BENEFIT ENTITIES FRAMEWORK

Committee e.v. Accounting Standards

Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street EC4M 6XH LONDON United Kingdom

Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements

FRAMEWORK FOR THE PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Click to edit Master title style. Presentation of Financial Statements ( LKAS 1)

Summary note of the Accounting Standards Advisory Forum

REVENUE RECOGNITION PROJECT UPDATED OCTOBER 2013 TOPICAL CONTENTS

Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors

Discussion Paper: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

FRAMEWORK FOR THE PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements

A Framework-based approach to teaching of IFRSs

EFRAG Update. Summary of EFRAG meetings held in September October Highlights. October 2011

Re: Comments on Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Recognition Criteria in the Conceptual Framework

January Global financial crisis

Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements

IASB update: Progress and Plans

Presentation of items of Other Comprehensive Income

Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standard for Private Entities

Understanding IFRSs A Framework-based approach to applying IFRSs

Re: EFFAS Comment Letter on the Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Communiqué November 2014

IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 2.0 June 2008 Moscow, Russia Page 1 of 5

Summary of potential inconsistencies between the existing Standards and the Conceptual Framework Exposure Draft

CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli +44 (0)

Discussion Paper: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Role of Nature of an Entity s Business Activities in Accounting Standard-Setting

Comments on IASB Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

Decree approving the Accounting system for the Business Sector in Mozambique

Transcription:

For Discussion at the WG meeting Conceptual Framework WG Tomo Sekiguchi WG Leader: Accounting Standards Board of Japan 25 November 2014 1 Objective of the Session To better understand the recent IASB s tentative decisions and rationales thereof regarding the Conceptual Framework project. To identify issues that the WG may want to highlight during the AOSSG annual conference, in addition to those already identified in the Issues Paper. 2 1

Current Status Index IASB Tentative Decisions (DP Sections 1-4) IASB Tentative Decisions (DP Sections 5-9) Copyright 2013 Accounting Standards 3 CURRENT STATUS 2

Conceptual Framework WG Members Lead Japan Working Group members Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Korea, Macao, Malaysia, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, Singapore 5 Activities of the WG The AOSSG submitted its comment letter on the DP A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Since then, the WG members have been closely monitoring the IASB s deliberation. In addition, the WG has continued to provide inputs to the AOSSG representative each time the ASAF meeting was convened. The AOSSG had preliminary discussion about the recent IASB s tentative decisions regarding the Conceptual Framework project in its interim meeting in September 2014. 6 3

Status of the IASB s deliberation After the comment period of the DP, the IASB restarted its deliberation of the Conceptual Framework project. The IASB has had discussion in its meetings of March 2014 to October 2014. The IASB plans to have discussion in its meeting of November 2014, so as to discuss a few sweep issues that have surfaced after the IASB deliberated issues in its meetings. The IASB plans to publish the ED in the first quarter of 2015, with a comment period of 150 days. 7 IASB s November 2014 meeting (1/2) In its meeting of November 2014, the IASB plans to discuss the following topics: Revision to definitions of income and expenses Income: increases in assets or decreases in liabilities that result in increases in equity, other than those relating to contributions from equity participants Expenses: decreases in assets or decreases in liabilities that result in decreases in equity, other than those relating to distributions to equity participants The discussion of income and expenses in the existing Conceptual should be amended, so that discussion that refers to revenue and gains as well as expenses and losses will not be included. 8 4

IASB s November 2014 meeting (2/2) (Continued) The Conceptual Framework should not comment on whether the objective of disclosure guidance in Standards include providing information that enables a user of financial statements to recalculate the amounts recognized in the financial statements. No further work will be done regarding the role of matching in the recognition of assets and liabilities 9 IASB S TENTATIVE DECISIONS (DP SECTIONS 1-4) 5

Section-1 Purpose and Status of the Conceptual Framework The purpose of the Conceptual Framework should be to identify the concepts that: (i) assist the IASB to develop and revise the Standards; (ii) assist preparers to develop accounting policies when no Standard applies to a particular transaction, event or condition; and (iii) assist all parties to understand and interpret the Standards. In a limited number of cases, the IASB may depart from aspects of the Conceptual Framework. If the IASB does so, the IASB will explain the departure in the Basis for Conclusions on the Standard in question. 11 Section-2 Definitions of Assets and Liabilities Asset of an entity: a present economic resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events. Liability of an entity: a present obligation of the entity to transfer an economic resource as a result of past events. Economic resource: a right that is capable of producing economic benefits. (Note) The phrase or other source of value was deleted from the definition of an economic resource that was proposed in the Discussion Paper. 12 6

Section-2 Other Elements Definitions of Incomes and Expenses will be unchanged (revenues/gains & expenses / losses will not be separately defined). The Conceptual Framework will not define elements for: The statement of changes in equity; and The statement of cash flows. The Conceptual Framework will not define elements for profit or loss. 13 Section-3 Additional Guidance to Support the Asset Definition Guidance on economic resources based on paragraph 3.5 of the DP Guidance on economic benefit broadly consistent with the guidance in paragraph 3.6 of the DP The purpose of depreciation and amortization is to depict consumption of the economic resources that constitutes an asset. 14 7

Section-3 Additional Guidance to Support the Liability Definition (1/2) An entity has a present obligation to transfer an economic resource as a result of past events if both: the entity has no practical ability (see the next slide) to avoid the transfer; and the amount of the transfer is determined by reference to benefits that the entity has received, or activities that it has conducted, in the past. 15 Section-3 Additional Guidance to Support the Liability Definition (2/2) No practical ability Constructive obligation can result in a entity having no practical ability to avoid the transfer In some situations, an entity has a present obligation if the entity has no practical ability to avoid the particular course of actions that would require the transfer, and the other criterion (with regard to determination of the amount) is also met. An entity has no practical ability avoid the transfer: When all courses of action that avoid the transfer would cause significant business disruption or have economic consequences significantly more adverse than the transfer itself. When the obligation could be avoided only by liquidating the entity or ceasing trading. 16 8

Section-3 Executory Contracts Executory contract contains a right and an obligation to exchange economic resources (or to pay or receive the difference in values between two economic resources if the contract will be settled net). The combined right and obligation would constitute a single asset or liability. If an entity enters into a forward contract to purchase a resource at a future date, the entity s asset is normally its right to buy the underlying resource, not the underlying resource itself. However, in some circumstances the terms of a forward contract to purchase a resource may give the purchaser control of that resource. In such circumstances, the contract is not executory. 17 Section-3 The concept of Control Supporting guidance should identify exposure to the significant risks and rewards of ownership as an indicator of control. The terminology relating to control should be consistent with that in IFRS 10, instead of using the term risks and rewards of ownership. The Conceptual Framework should state that an entity controls an economic resource if it has the present ability to direct the use of the economic resource and obtain the economic benefits that flow from it. 18 9

Section-4 Recognition The Conceptual Framework should not establish criteria that govern the recognition of an asset or liability, but should describe factors to consider, including the following: If the asset or liability exists is uncertain. If future flows of economic benefits will likely to occur. If there is very significant measurement uncertainty. 19 Section-4 Derecognition The Conceptual Framework should describe the approaches available, and discuss what factors to consider, in deciding at the Standards-level: how best to portray the changes that result from a transaction in which an entity retains only a component of an asset or a liability, by either (i) full derecognition, (ii) partial derecognition, or (iii) continued recognition); and how to account for modifications of contracts. 20 10

COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS? Do you agree with the IASB s tentative decision about recognition? Or, do you think that probability and/or reliability criteria should be explicitly stated in the Conceptual Framework? Do you have any comments or questions on the IASB s tentative decisions, regarding: Purpose and status of the Conceptual Framework? Definitions of Assets and Liabilities and their supporting guidance? Not defining profit or loss and/or OCI? Not establishing criteria for derecognition? Other matters? IASB S TENTATIVE DECISIONS (DP SECTIONS 5-9) 11

Section-5 Liability and Equity (1/2) The Conceptual Framework should keep the existing binary distinction of liabilities and equity (not to amend those definitions at this time). The Conceptual Framework should not provide detailed guidance on how to distinguish liabilities from equity instruments. The Conceptual Framework should neither require nor preclude any accounting requirements for classes of claims within equity. 23 Section-5 Liability and Equity (2/2) The ED for the Conceptual Framework will propose retaining the existing definition of equity and clarifying some aspects of the definition of a liability that are not directly related to distinguishing liabilities from equity. The proposed definitions of a liability and of equity to be included in the ED for the Conceptual Framework will not constrain the work in the research project. The research project will consider various approaches to distinguishing between liabilities and equity, including approaches that could require changes to the definitions of a liability or of equity in the Conceptual Framework. Nevertheless, any such changes are unlikely to reverse the characteristics to be suggested in the ED for the Conceptual Framework. 24 12

Section-6 Measurement (1/4) The Conceptual Framework should Not define a separate measurement objective. Describe the following: "Measurement is the process of quantifying in monetary terms information about the resources of an entity, claims against the entity and changes in those resources and claims. Such information helps users to assess the entity s prospects for future cash flows and assess management s stewardship of the entity s resources. It is likely that the IASB selects different measurement bases for different assets and liabilities. Measurement categories will be based on historical cost and current value. 25 Section-6 Measurement (2/4) The Conceptual Framework should state that when the IASB selects a measurement basis, it should consider the nature and relevance of the resulting information produced in both the statement of financial position and the statement(s) of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (OCI). The Conceptual Framework state that: The level of uncertainty associated with the measurement of an item is one of the factors that should be considered when selecting a measurement basis. If a measurement is subject to a high degree of measurement uncertainty, that fact does not, by itself, mean that the measurement does not provide relevant information. Cash flow-based measurement is a technique to implement one of the measurement bases. 26 13

Section-6 Measurement (3/4) Factors to be considered when selecting a measurement basis for an asset or liability should include: How the asset or liability will contribute to future cash flows. This will depend in part on the nature of the business activities being considered. The characteristics of the asset or liability (for example, the nature or extent of the variability in the item s cash flows, the sensitivity of the value of the item to changes in market factors or other risks inherent in the item) The relative importance of each of the factors to be considered when selecting a measurement basis will depend upon facts and circumstances. It may be appropriate to use one measurement basis for BS and a different measurement basis for the PL when such an approach better reflects the nature of the business activities conducted. 27 Section-6 Measurement (4/4) Measurement basis used on initial recognition should be consistent with measurement basis subsequently. However, this should not prevent: Current values being used in some circumstances as a deemed cost on initial measurement; and A change in measurement basis if such a change increases the relevance of the information provided. 28 14

Section-7 Presentation and Disclosure The Conceptual Framework should include certain communication principles. The Conceptual Framework should include the discussion of disclosure of risks and forward-looking information proposed in the Discussion Paper. In particular: The IASB would normally consider requiring disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from the entity s assets and liabilities. The IASB should require forward-looking information to be included in the notes to the financial statements only if it provides relevant information about the assets and liabilities that existed at the end of, or during, the reporting period. 29 Section-8 Presentation in the statement of comprehensive income (1/3) The Conceptual Framework should: require profit or loss as a total or subtotal. describe profit or loss as the primary source of information about an entity s performance for the period but emphazise that it is not the only source of such information. For example, items included in OCI also provide information about an entity s performance. describe the dual objectives for profit or loss as depicting the return that an entity has made on its economic resources during the period, and providing information that is helpful in assessing prospects for future cash flows. 30 15

Section-8 Presentation in the statement of comprehensive income (2/3) The Conceptual Framework should include: Include a rebuttable presumption that all items of income and expense should be included in profit or loss unless the IASB concludes in a particular Standard that including an item of income and expense or a component of such an item in OCI would enhance the relevance of profit or loss as the primary source of information about an entity s performance for the period. State that one example when the rebuttable presumption discussed above could be rebutted is when the IASB concludes that one measurement basis is appropriate for an asset or a liability in the statement of financial position and another measurement basis is appropriate for profit or loss. In such cases, the resulting difference would be reported in OCI. Include a rebuttable presumption that all items of income and expense included in OCI should be recycled to profit or loss. 31 Section-8 Presentation in the statement of comprehensive income (3/3) The Conceptual Framework should include: propose that the presumption for including items of income and expense in profit or loss can only be rebutted for changes in current measures of assets and liabilities, and only if including those changes or components of those changes in OCI enhances the relevance of profit or loss as the primary source of information about an entity s performance for the period; and emphasise that including items of income and expense resulting from changes in current measures of assets and liabilities or components of those changes in OCI is an application of the classification, aggregation and disaggregation principle for presentation and disclosure. 32 16

Section-9 Other Issues (1/4) Stewardship OB2 The objective of general purpose financial reporting is to provide financial information about the reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors in making decisions about providing resources to the entity. Those decisions involve buying, selling or holding equity and debt instruments, and providing or settling loans and other forms of credit. OB3 Decisions by existing and potential investors about buying, selling or holding equity and debt instruments depend on the returns that they expect from an investment in those instruments, for example dividends, principal and interest payments or market price increases. Similarly, decisions by existing and potential lenders and other creditors about providing or settling loans and other forms of credit depend on the principal and interest payments or other returns that they expect. Investors, lenders and other creditors expectations about returns depend on their assessment of the amount, timing and uncertainty of (the prospects for) future net cash inflows to the entity and their assessment of management s stewardship of the entity s resources. Consequently, existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors need information to help them assess the prospects for future net cash inflows to an entity and information to help them assess management s stewardship of the entity s resources. OB4 To assess an entity s prospects for future net cash inflows and to assess management s stewardship of the entity s resources, existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors need information about the resources of the entity, claims against the entity, and how efficiently and effectively the entity s management and governing board have discharged their responsibilities to use the entity s resources. [ ] 33 Reliability Section-9 Other Issues (2/4) IASB will not replace the qualitative characteristic of faithful representation with reliability; IASB will not include reference to reliability as either an additional qualitative characteristic or an aspect of either relevance or faithful representation; and IASB Staff will consider in drafting whether it is possible to give greater prominence to the idea expressed in paragraph QC16 of the existing Conceptual Framework that if the level of uncertainty associated with an estimate is sufficiently large, that estimate might not provide relevant information. Not to replace the qualitative characteristic of faithful representation with reliability. 34 17

Section-9 Other Issues (3/4) Prudence QC14A Neutrality is supported by the exercise of prudence. Prudence is the exercise of caution when making judgements under conditions of uncertainty to ensure that assets or income are not overstated and liabilities or expenses are not understated. However, the exercise of prudence does not allow, for example, the creation of hidden reserves or excessive provisions, the deliberate understatement of assets or income, or the deliberate overstatement of liabilities or expenses, because the financial statements would not be neutral and, therefore, would not faithfully represent the entity s financial performance and financial position. 35 Section-9 Other Issues (4/4) Reporting Entity Business model Unit of account Going concern Capital maintenance Transition and effective date Consequential amendments Replacing the references to the Framework in Standards and Interpretations of IFRSs with the reference to the Conceptual Framework. 36 18

COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS? (1/3) Liabilities and equity Do you agree with the IASB s tentative decision to keep the binary classification for claims (as liability and equity)? Do you agree with the IASB s direction to proceed with the research project on liabilities and equity? Measurement and profit or loss Do you agree with the IASB s tentative decision regarding the two measurement categories (historical cost and current value)? COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS? (2/3) Do you agree with the IASB s tentative decision about how to select measurement bases for an asset or a liability, including the connection between measurement and profit or loss? Do you think that more explanation should be necessary for how business activities are conducted in the context of selecting a measurement basis? Do you think that the discussion of profit or loss should be improved? In particular, do you think that profit or loss should be all-inclusive (or all OCI should be recycled at some point of time)? 19

COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS? (3/3) Others Do you have any comments or questions on the IASB s tentative decisions, regarding: Nature and extent of detail with regard to the discussion of presentation and disclosure? Changes relating to stewardship, reliability and prudence? Not addressing several items that were suggested in the comments to the DP? Consequential amendments? Other issues? REMAINING QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? 20