Rate Case Process and Rate-Based Ratemaking

Similar documents
U.S REGULATORY ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS IN PRACTICE

Matthew Wurst Aspassia Staevska Patrick Donlon

APPENDIX IX ATTACHMENT 1 FORMULA RATE PROTOCOLS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPLICATION OF LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO ELECTRIC) LLC (U 933 E)

ELECTRICITY ACT, 2005

STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION : : : : ORDER

Energy Bar Association

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

M E M O R A N D U M. Issue

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ORDER IDENTIFYING ISSUES

MISO Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee Analysis. PJM Energy Market Uplift Senior Task Force Meeting April 1, 2015

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main

STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION. Supplemental Notice of Inquiry

November 16, Ms. Donna Mitchell, CPA Controller/Treasurer City of Dover 5 East Reed Street Weyandt Hall, Suite 300 Dover, Delaware 19901

AEP Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

Report to the 85 th Texas Legislature

Regulatory Authority Competences in Monitoring the Bookkeeping of the Regulated Companies. Robin Kliethermes Rachel Lewis

Community Solar Rate Rider: Schedule No February 13, 2018

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

Three other items are noteworthy in comparing Big Rivers 2004 financial results to those of First, based upon a favorable ruling from the

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.

Electric Utility Transmission

IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15 (Schedule B);

Total Capitalization: $2.1 billion Total Capital Expenditures: $322 million Total Employees: 1,430

Assembly Bill No. 428 Committee on Commerce and Labor

Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario DECISION AND RATE ORDER EB WEST COAST HURON ENERGY INC.

Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario DECISION AND RATE ORDER EB VERIDIAN CONNECTIONS INC.

Available In all territory served by the Company in the State of Wyoming.

RR16 - Page 1 of

Board of Directors Policy

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. (Appearances are listed in Appendix H.)

RATES FOR EXPORT TRANSMISSION SERVICE

THE NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY RENEWABLE ENERGY GROWTH PROGRAM FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS

Electricity (Development of Small Power Projects) GN. No. 77 (contd.) THE ELECTRICITY ACT (CAP.131) RULES. (Made under sections 18(5), 45 and 46))

Tariff and Business Rules. For Electric Service Provided by. Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc.

SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CUSTOMER-OWNED RESOURCES.

TRIEAGLE COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER AGREEMENT FIXED RATE PRODUCT

Revenue Requirements, Rate Base and Cost of Capital Analysis and Process By the Office of Accounting & Finance New York State Department of Public

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (GND-5) Docket No ER-15 Witness: Gregory N. Duvall BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario

FERC Order on Base ROE Complaint against New England Transmission Owners

PJM INTERCONNECTION, L.L.C. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

NOTICE OF FILING OF ELECTRIC RATE INCREASE AND PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CUSTOMERS OF ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY

MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Rick Sites Tom O Brien. members. INGS. AEP Ohio is. DIR are: Amount. including. unclear v1

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.

TRANSMISSION OWNER ZONAL PLACEMENT PROCESS

September 25, General Rate Application of Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro, Requests for Information, Round #1

Cost of Service Ratemaking Overview Before the House Economic Matters Committee. January 10, Maryland Public Service Commission

Public Utility District No. 1 of Lewis County. Customer Information. and. Electric Rate Schedules

Criteria for Eligibility

Chapter 38. UTILITIES* ARTICLE III. ELECTRIC SERVICE*

Docket No U Docket No U FINAL ORDER

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA. on behalf of.

Traditional Economic Regulation of Electric Utilities

PAUL CHERNICK ELLEN HAWES

IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15 (Schedule B);

NEW HAMPSHIRE CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RULES. CHAPTER Puc 2000 COMPETITIVE ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIER AND AGGREGATOR RULES

Greene County. Electric Power Aggregation Plan of Operation and Governance

Cooperative Electric Rates 2013 Power System Engineering, Inc.

Business Update Supplement SCE 2015 General Rate Case Decision

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

The following words and terms shall have the following meanings when used in this Tariff:

Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on May 31, 2017, E STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UTILITIES BOARD

Re: PPL Electric Utilities Corporation Transmission Service Charge Effective June 1, 2011 Docket No. M

THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND

CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. & CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT. for the period ended

PJM INTERCONNECTION, L.L.C. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

THE CITY ELECTRIC AGGREGATION PROGRAM IS A SMART CHOICE:

BC HYDRO S RATE DESIGN APPLICATION FARM AND IRRIGATION CUSTOMER ISSUES. Presentation to the BC Cranberry Marketing Commission (BCCMC) June 15, 2015

APPROVED February 27, 2018 DIRECTOR of PUBLIC UTILITY DIVISION

ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD

Senate Bill No. 146 Senator Spearman

GASUM CONSOLIDATED (IFRS) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2013

DRAFT. National Electric Power Regulatory Authority Guidelines For Determination of Consumer-end Tariff (Methodology &Process)

Rate Code: L L-16 SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY (SANTEE COOPER) LARGE LIGHT AND POWER SCHEDULE L-16

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY

Carbon Offset Natural Gas and/or Electricity and RECs Terms and Conditions

Application Terms & Conditions and Final Payment Agreement

O.C.G.A GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session ***

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE LOW INCOME PANEL

Miami County, Ohio FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2013 through 2017

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. The following Commissioners participated in the disposition of this matter:

4. Supply Rewards 5. Renewable Energy Certificates.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BELMONT MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT NET METERING AND BUYBACK TARIFF FOR EMISSION FREE RENEWABLE GENERATING FACILITIES SERVING CUSTOMER LOAD

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC. Docket No. R Direct Testimony. Lisa A. Boyd

Guide to Customer Contributions and FortisAlberta Investment

9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. Each Participating TO shall enter into a Transmission Control Agreement with the

BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES KANSAS CITY, KANSAS

OHIO LEGISLATIVE SERVICE COMMISSION

NEW YORK SHARED METER LAW

RESIDENTIAL TERMS & CONDITIONS ( Agreement )

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014

Ontario Energy Board RP Board Proposal Regulated Price Plan for Electricity Consumers. Submission of Aegent Energy Advisors Inc.

Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario RATE ORDER EB HYDRO ONE NETWORKS INC.

ROCKLAND ELECTRIC COMPANY PROPOSAL FOR BASIC GENERATION SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TO BE PROCURED EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2016

Public Service Commission

Transcription:

Rate Case Process and Rate-Based Ratemaking

Why Ratemaking? The obvious. Cost recovery for investments Risk minimization Hedging against outside fluctuations Economic development 2

Growth Economic growth is directly related to electric growth Energy is a key input to economic growth Energy demand and GNP have a direct correlation both have grown over 60% in the past 25 years Low-cost reliable electric power is the key to economic well-being 3

Why Ratemaking? Maybe the not so obvious Ohio has reinstituted integrated resource planning within resource planning, environmental compliance is addressed from an accepted resource plan flows forecasting modeling resource analysis and fuel mix analysis all of the above will allow for a rate case proceeding 4

State Regulatory Commissions Price Risk Reliability Generation Physical availability Transmission Being able to deliver Environmental Performance 5

Initiating a Rate Case Why? By a company to obtain more revenue; by a customer through a complaint case; or by the PUCO through a Commission Ordered Investigation (COI) How? Company makes a Pre-Filing Notice (PFN) and informs mayors and legislative bodies 30 days before filing the full application at the Commission Application filed no earlier than 30 days after the PFN Company has the burden of proof in the request for an increase in rates Company files work papers, testimony and a set of proposed rates Company publishes notice once a week for 2 weeks in newspapers 6

Rate Case Steps Staff investigates the company s expenses, revenues and investment Revenue Requirement the amount of money that allows the company to cover expenses and earn a fair return on investment Rate Design how the revenue be collected from the various classes (residential, commercial, industrial) and based upon cost-of-service (i.e. the charge levied against a customer is proportional to the expense of service to the customer) 7

Rate Case Procedure Staff Report is filed - usually within 5 months of the application. (not a statutory timeline) Objections to the Staff report must be filed within 30 days. (supported by testimony) Objections & Testimony frame the issues if not objected to, then Staff report carries the burden 8

The Parties to a Rate Case The Attorney General s office represents the PUCO Staff in the hearing and /or negotiations Office of Consumer s Counsel (state agency representing residential consumers) Commercial customers Industrial customers Cities 9

Rate Case Hearings Publish notice of upcoming hearings Two types of hearings: 1. Public Hearing: the public gets to hear about the proposed rate change an make comments. Public hearings are held in the communities affected by the application. 2. Evidentiary Hearing: an attorney examiner presides and witnesses testify to support their positions and are subject to cross-examination from other parties. PUCO staff testify at the evidentiary hearing in support of the staff report. 10

After the Hearings Parties file briefs with the Commission within a time established by the PUCO attorney examiner. Usually file initial briefs and reply briefs. PUCO attorney examiner writes an order and circulates it to the Commissioners. The Commissioners provide input and vote on the order at a commission meeting. PUCO Order is issued within 275 days of the application filing otherwise the company can put requested rates into effect subject to refund. Applications for Rehearing must be filed within 30 days. Any issue appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court must be raised in the application for rehearing 11

Appeal of Commission Order Appealing party must file a notice of appeal with the Ohio Supreme Court within 60 days of the date of denial of the application for rehearing by the Commission. No deadline in which the Court must act; however, the Court must hear PUCO appeals. Most appeals to the Ohio Supreme Court are discretionary the court chooses what it will hear. Court can affirm/agree with the Commission order. Court can reverse the PUCO decision. Court can reverse and remand to the Commission 12

Rate Case Timeline Month 1 Commission accepts the filing/application within 30 days, establishes test year & Staff investigation begins Month 5 Staff Report filed Month 6 Objections to Staff report filed within 30 days (with supporting testimony) Months 7 & 8 Local public hearing & evidentiary hearing completed Briefs filed Month 9 Commission issues decision (275 days) Applications for Rehearing before Commission Appeal to Ohio Supreme Court 13

Electric Restructuring Timeline 9/08-4/09 3/26/98 HB 732 (Mead) and SB 237 (Johnson) introduced. Both bills die in committee 7/6/99 Gov. Taft signs SB 3, bill takes effect 10/5 1/1/01 Ohio Electric Choice begins 10/02 1/05 PUCO approves Rate Stabilization Plans 1/1/06 Rate Stabilization Plans take effect 5/1/08 Gov. Strickland signs SB 221 PUCO develops and adopts SB 221 rules 12/31/08 Rate Stabilization Plans expire 12/31/10 Recovery of regulatory stranded costs ends 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 3/96 HB 653 (Amstutz) introduced. 1/1/99 SB 3 (Johnson) and HB 5 (Mead) introduced 7/00-10/00 PUCO adopts transition plans for electric utilities 1/01-12/05 SB 3 Market Development Period 12/31/05 9/25/07 Recovery of generation stranded costs ends SB 221 (Schuler) introduced 7/31/08 SB 221 takes effect 12/08-3/09 PUCO approves initial Electric Security Plans (ESP) 8/25/10 PUCO approves FirstEnergy ESP 2 14

Why Regulation? Electricity has historically been considered a natural monopoly. Entry into this market required huge investments in infrastructure. Electricity was considered a public good. Very few people could make the investment to get into the electric business and those who did could take advantage of the monopoly. 15

Company Submission Rate Base Income Statement Cost of Capital Required Total Revenues Class Cost of Service Study Rate Design and Tariff Changes Testimony/Explanation of Schedules 16

Application For Establishment or Change in Rate If the application is for an increase in rates it shall also contain: A report of property that is used and useful in providing utility service; A complete operating statement of its last fiscal year, showing in detail all its receipts, revenues, and incomes from all sources, all of its operating costs and other expenditures, and any analysis such public utility deems applicable to the matter referred to in said application; A statement of the income and expense anticipated under the application filed; A statement of financial condition summarizing assets, liabilities, and net worth; A proposed notice for newspaper publication fully disclosing the substance of the application; Such other information as the commission may require in its discretion 17

Parties to a Rate Case The Attorney General s office represents the Staff in the hearing and /or negotiations Office of Consumer s Counsel (state agency representing residential consumers) Commercial customers Industrial customers Cities 18

Rate Case Steps Staff investigates the company s expenses, revenues and investment Revenue Requirement the amount of money that allows the company to cover expenses and earn a fair return on investment Rate Design how the revenue will be collected from the various classes? residential, commercial, industrial. Based upon cost-of-service the charge levied against a customer are proportional to the expense of service the customer 19

Uniform System of Accounts for Electric Companies Electric light companies are required to keep their books of accounts and records in accordance with the uniform system of accounts prescribed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio reserves the right to require the creation and maintenance of additional accounts to cover the accounting procedures of electric light companies operating within the state of Ohio. 20

Staff Investigation Time Prior to Application Being Filed: Develop an overall understanding of the applicant's operations and financial position and a general understanding of the applicant's industry. Develop a specific familiarity with the applicant and to develop an understanding of : The prior rate case issues The staff's treatment of the prior issues Commission rulings on these prior issue 21

FIRST, the total revenue requirement for a utility is determined; THEN, the revenue requirement for individual classes of customers (i.e. Residential, Commercial, Industrial and other street and traffic lighting) must be determined; and, THIRD, rates must be designed such that each class pays for its own costs. The total revenue received from all the classes equals the total revenue requirement. The most important step in determining the revenue distribution between and among the classes and in developing rates is the cost of service study. 22

Revenue Requirement Formula In determining the total revenues a utility should receive through electric service rates, the PUCO, by law, uses the following general formula: Revenue Requirement = Expenses + Depreciation + Taxes + (rate of return X Rate Base) 23

Setting Base Rates Operating Income Base Revenues Fuel Revenues Misc. Revenues Total Revenues Operation and Maintenance Exp. Depreciation Exp. Tax Expense Total Operating Expenses Total Operating Income Rate Base Plant in Service Less: Depreciation Reserve Net Plant in Service C.W.I.P. Working Capital Cash Materials and Supplies Fuel Other Rate Base Items Rate Base 24

The Commission computes the gross annual revenues to which a utility is entitled by adding the dollar amount of a fair and reasonable rate of return on the valuation of its property to the cost of rendering the public service for the test period. 25

METHODS OF COMPUTING AN AUTHORIZED RETURN ON EQUITY 26

Constant Growth Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Model E(r) = (D 1 /P 0 ) + g E(r) = expected return, cost of equity capital D 1 = Dividend at the end of period one P 0 = current stock price g = expected growth rate 27

Non-Constant Growth Discounted Cash Flow Model P 0 = D 1 /(1+E(r)) + D 2 /(1+E(r)) 2 + + D n /(1+E(r)) n + P n /(1+E(r)) n E(r) = expected return, cost of equity capital D 1 = dividend at the end of period one P 0 = current stock price P n = expected stock price in year n, or P n = ((D n (1+g))/(E(r) g)) if the growth rate beyond year n is expected to be constant g = expected growth rate 28

Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) E(r) = R f + β(r m R f ) E(r) = the expected return, cost of equity capital R f = the risk free rate R m = the required rate of return on the overall market β = the beta risk measurement. 29

Risk Premium Method E(r) = R f + R p E(r) = expected return, cost of equity capital R f = Risk Free Rate R p = Risk Premium 30

Basic Sources Utilities accounting records Plant investment data Detailed property records Balance sheets Operating expenses Performance of generating units Load research System maps Operating results for a particular 12-month period Normalization 31

Key terms Test period = unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, the test period shall be the 12-month period beginning the six months prior to the date the application is filed and ending six months subsequent to that date. In no event shall the test period end more than nine months subsequent to the date the application is filed. The revenues and expenses of the utility shall be determined for the test period. Date Certain = the date certain shall fall within the test period, but be no later than the date of the application. The valuation of the used and useful property of the public utility shall be determined as of the date certain. 32

Key terms Expenses = the day-to-day costs of providing customers with electricity. Expenses generally include operation and maintenance expenses (e.g. fuel, labor) and administrative and customer-service-related expenses. Depreciation and taxes are also expenses, but are generally broken out separately in the revenue requirement calculation. Rate Base = the amount of money invested in plants and equipment needed to supply electricity, and a working capital allowance. Rate base items generally include Gross Plant (plant = production, transmission, distribution and general facilities and equipment), the Accumulated Depreciation on those facilities and equipment, Construction Work In Process (CWIP) and Working Capital. 33

Key terms Return on Rate Base = the amount of money needed to cover the cost of funds invested in rate base. Revenues = the amount of money the utility receives from charging the approved rates. Net Operating Income = Rate Base X rate of return Gross Revenue Conversion Factor (GRCF) = The factor which shows the relationship between increases in revenue and expenses used in order to calculate the corresponding increase in expenses (primarily due to tax effects) due to an increase in revenues. 34

The Cost of Service Study (COSS) Provides cost information that allows the rate analyst to allocate costs to the various classes of customers. Provides cost information that is functionalized, classified, and allocated to various customer classes for a particular utility company. The schedule should an be account by account detail of all expenses and revenues over the twelve-month test year period 35

Purpose of Cost Studies Attribute costs to different categories of customers based on how those customers cause costs to be incurred Determine how costs will be recovered from customers within each class Calculate costs of individual types of service based on the costs each service requires to utility to expend Determine revenue requirement for the services offered Separate costs between different regulatory jurisdictions 36

Functionalization Costs are functionally separated into: Production related Transmission related Distribution related 37

Production Costs Costs related to the production of electricity such as the electric generating plant in service variable costs such as fuel operation and Maintenance Can also include purchase of power (wholesale) And delivery INTO the bulk system at the bus-bars of the power stations interconnection points 38

Transmission Costs Predominantly fixed costs Does not vary with the quantity of energy transmitted Associated with the transmitting of the energy from the generating plant to the distribution facilities Transmission of power to and from interconnected utilities Transfer of power from one geographical location to another, various regions or load centers 39

Distribution Costs Costs associated with plant, equipment, maintenance and operation required to move the energy from the transmission system to the customer s premises. Affected primarily by demand and number of customers 40

Classification Once the costs are functionalized, they can then be classified into Demand, Energy, and Customer related costs. Service characteristics Demand usage Energy consumption Number of customers 41

Demand Costs Demand costs are generally the fixed costs related to plant in service. Rate base and expense items related to PEAK USAGE of electric power Basis of demand (KW) imposed on the system during specific peak hours Most generation and transmission supply facilities fall into this category Demand costs are generally allocated to various customer classes based on the coincident demand of the class during the utility system peak period. This could be anything from a 1 C.P. (coincident peak) to a 12 C.P., depending on the operating characteristics of the utility company 42

Energy Costs Energy costs are generally variable costs. Allocated among customer classes on the basis of energy (KWH) which the system must supply to serve the customers. Rate base and expense items related to total kilowatthours consumed during a period of time. Fuel and operation/maintenance. Energy costs are allocated to the various classes based on each class energy usage compared to the total energy usage from all classes. For example, if Residential customers use 33% of the total energy consumed then the residential class will be assigned 33% of all energy related expenses. 43

Customer Costs Customer costs are generally fixed Customer costs are allocated to the various classes based on the number of customers in those classes. Directly related to an individual customer taking service from the utility, such as meter expense or service drop 44

Typical Cost Classifications Typical Cost Function Production Transmission Distribution Customer Service Typical Cost Classification Demand Related Energy Related Demand Related Energy Related Demand Related Energy Related Customer Related Customer Related Demand Related 45

Allocation Once the costs are classified they can then be allocated to the various customer classes such as Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Other. 46

Rate Design Once all costs have been allocated to the classes you can design rates for the classes. Each customer class generally has several different rate schedules in an attempt to provide appropriate rate designs to meet individual customer characteristics. Each rate schedule can have a separate rate for Customer, Demand and Energy Not all rate schedules have all three rate components. If there is not a separate demand charge, the demand costs are likely included in the energy charge. Often, Residential and Small Commercial schedules are designed this way, since such customers generally have inexpensive kwh-only metering. 47

Customer Charge The customer charge is determined by taking the amount of customer-related costs that were allocated to this class and dividing the amount by the number of customers in the class. $100,000 of customer-related costs class of 100 customers divide the $100,000 by the 100 customers and then divide by 12 to get a monthly customer charge. (($100,000/100)/12) = $83.33 48

Demand Charge The demand charge is calculated by dividing the total demand related costs allocated to a class by the total class demand (kw). Rates may be blocked (different rates for different blocks of demand) to reflect variations in costs due to a customer s demand pattern. 49

Energy Charge The energy charge is calculated by dividing the total energy related costs allocated to a class by the total kwh s used by that class. Rates may also be blocked (different rates for different blocks of usage) to reflect variations in costs due to a customer s usage patterns. 50

A typical tariff schedule will look like : Schedule A Customer Charge $83.33/mo. Demand Charge First 50 kw/kw $10.00 Over 50 kw/kw $8.00 Energy Charge First 1,000 kwh/kwh $ 0.085 Next 1,000 kwh/kwh $ 0.045 Over 2,000 kwh/kwh $ 0.025 51

While it is practical to design rates as described above, other criteria must be considered Some other non-cost causation generally accepted principles of rate design are: gradualism continuity resulting customer bills ease of understanding 52

Rate Design Base rates typically include a fixed component and a variable component Historically, the fixed component was small relative to the variable component. Ohio has recently moved away from this approach and replaced it with a Straight Fixed Variable rate design in gas cases. 53

Straight Fixed Variable (SFV) Rates Under SFV, all distribution costs (base rates) are recovered in the fixed component. There is no variable charge. SFV recognizes that an LDCs distribution costs do not vary with volumes. Under SFV, all residential customers pay the same for distribution service. No more subsidies from high-use to low-use customers 54

Regulation is an art, not a science. 55

All regulation is incentive regulation. 56

Rate of Return Regulation Prices set to generate allowed rate of return Used and useful plant Reasonable earnings Earnings stability Prices and revenues tied to cost of production/delivery Consumers bear risk Limited incentives for exceptional performance 57

Rate of Return Regulation Prices are set to generate a rate of return Utility allowed reasonable earnings Prices are linked to costs Departure from earnings trigger regulatory reviews Pass-through mechanisms used for variable expenses, such as fuel 58

Positive Attributes of Rate of Return Prices are reflective of costs Utility provided revenue stability Prevents against excessive over- and under- earnings Customer provided rate certainty Potential for cost containment with regulatory timing lag 59

Some Problems Information intensive Subjective Contentious and costly proceedings They may also be frequent Cross subsidies can occur 60

And Potential Disadvantages If rate of return is not equal to the actual cost of capital, can lead to over- or under- investment When pass-through mechanisms are utilized for operating costs, price risk hedging is not needed or used Nor are there rewards for cost containment Consumer bears the risk No incentives for good performance Investment decisions may be perverted Long run cost reductions minimal Short-run costs reductions favorable to utility, a reward due to regulatory lag 61