Prospects for a Closer Brent/WTI Relationship in Europe Platts proposes adding U.S. crude to Brent assessment.

Similar documents
Third-Quarter U.S. Crude Review and Outlook Higher prices, production, and exports.

Can LOOP Ever Be a Gulf Coast Cushing? Part 2 Searching for a sour crude benchmark.

Quality and Location Count for WTI Contracts Houston futures specifications differ.

The Permian Triangle: Midland Discounts Encourage Exports Pipeline congestion expected for another year.

thousand b/d Exhibit 1 PADD 2 Refinery Coker Capacity by District Eastern Midwest Northern Midwest Southern Midwest Oct-16 Oct-10 Oct-12 Oct-15 Oct-14

Calmer Markets Suggest Crude Price Consensus Speculators burned by lower volatility.

Signs of a Return to the Drilling Fields The impact of OPEC s agreement on U.S. shale production.

Is the Permian Still King of the Hill? Crude growth rate slows compared to other basins.

Pipeline Plans Suggest Tsunami of Crude Exports Midstream companies looking to double Gulf Coast shipments.

Atlantic Sunrise Coming On Line U.S. Power and Gas Weekly

Forties pipeline outage opens way to US Gulf benchmarking

Summer ERCOT U.S. power and gas weekly.

Session 5 US Gulf Coast Export Infrastructure Developments

The Oil Market s Mixed Price Signals

Welcome to NYMEX WTI Light Sweet Crude Oil Futures

Joint IEA-IEF-OPEC Report. Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of the Principles for Oil Price Reporting Agencies on the Physical Oil Market

2016 Americas Crude Viewpoints & News Round-up

Yoshiki Ogawa, Ph. D. General Manager, the Second Research Department

CME Group and the Benefits of the Tighter WTI Specifications

Shai Even Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Citi One-on-One MLP/Midstream Infrastructure Conference - August 2014

Crude benchmarks: A global market, but not one global number

Methodology and specifications guide. Last Updated: July 2018 The most up-to-date Argus Crude methodology is available on

NGL s Markets Beyond Mont Belvieu

Methodology and specifications guide. Last Updated: December 2017 The most up-to-date Argus Crude methodology is available on

How Governments Sell Their Oil John van Schaik

New and emerging price benchmarks in the Americas

SELF-CERTIFICATION NEW PRODUCT LISTING OF FUTURES CONTRACTS ON CANADIAN CRUDE OIL (WCH)

response to the immense volatility that resulted from the oil price

Can Russia Use Its Energy Endowment and the World Oil System To Its Advantage?

The United States: Center of the Global Oil Market

1993 ISDA Commodity Derivatives Definitions

Energy and commodity price benchmarking and market insights

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No May 14, 2010

Jet Fuel Spot Markets & Price Reporting

SECTION TTT PART II C: DIFFERENTIALS CRUDE OIL AND REFINED PRODUCTS PART II: SPECIFIC STANDARD TERMS FOR SWAP FUTURES CONTRACTS:

Review of trading and delivery data for the DME Window volumes (for Oman OSP)

10 TH ANNUAL OIL TRADER ACADEMY SUMMER SCHOOL

Evolving Benchmarks in the New Oil Order

Gasoline-Naphtha-Crude-MTBE Methodology

Price formation for small crude streams. 6 th Joint IEA-IEF-OPEC Workshop. Market Reporting Consulting Events

Exchange Futures for Physical (EFPs) October 13, 2005

Oiltanking s Houston Ship Channel Pipeline and Storage Project September 21,

2019 economic outlook:

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports Second Quarter 2017 Results and Declares Quarterly Cash Distribution

Alon USA Reports Third Quarter Results

Oil Value Chain & Markets. Global Oil Markets

Alon USA Energy, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2014 Results

Alon USA Energy, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Oil price. Laura Lungarini

Paul Eisman President & Chief Executive Officer January 2015

Investor Presentation

Oxford Energy Comment March 2009

Alon USA Energy, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2016 Results

Recent oil market volatility

Crude oil methodology. Last updated: 4 August 2014

Morningstar Global Category TM Classifications

Alon USA Energy, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2016 Results

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q

America s Crude Exports: Challenge and Opportunity. David Blackmon The Energy Summit October 24, 2018

Reversing flow: How the shale revolution redefined where oil trades, how it moves and how it is priced USAEE Washington, DC

Cement and Clinker Price Markers: Med Basin, Persian

Valero Energy Reports First Quarter 2018 Results

Alon USA Reports Second Quarter Results

FOURTH QUARTER 2017 Report to Shareholders for the period ended December 31, 2017

EDF Trading. The wholesale energy market specialist. At a Glance

Alon USA Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2012 Results

World Crude Methodology

Volatility in Energy Markets. Measures of Volatility Oil Gas Electricity Permits

Diamondback Energy, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2018 Financial and Operating Results and Announces Accretive Acquisition

NYMEX OTC Clearing. Presented at. North American Energy Standards Board ANNUAL MEETING September 25, 2002 HUNT VALLEY,MD

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results and Declares Quarterly Cash Distribution

Crude Oil Methodology

Key Priorities and Challenges for Canadian Oil

ALON USA ENERGY, INC.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CHEVRON ISSUES INTERIM UPDATE FOR THIRD QUARTER 2012

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

WELCOME, WE ARE BUYERS OF:

P R E S E N T S. U.S. Economic Outlook Virtuous Growth

Methodology For Crude Oil And Natural Gas Price Assumptions For Corporates And Sovereigns

Chapter 200 Light Sweet Crude Oil Futures

Canadian Natural Resources Limited MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction to Fuel Hedging. 23 rd April 2010

THE US: GROWING GLOBAL SIGNIFICANCE

Monthly oil sands production is available for purchase from the Alberta Energy

LNG market evolution, contracting & asset value

Energy and commodity price benchmarking and market insights

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports First Quarter 2017 Results and Declares Quarterly Cash Distribution

Pairs trading: opportunities in oil. 28th January 2009 Anthony Grech Research Analyst IG Index

Shai Even. Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Citi 2015 MLP/Midstream Infrastructure Conference August 2015

Energy Business Unit & Marketing. March 31, 2015 Ray Reipas, Senior Vice President, Energy

It Don t Come Easy: Low Crude Prices, Producer Breakevens and Drilling Economics

RMB EXCHANGE TRADED NOTES

Adjusted Net Income (Non-GAAP) $ 887,010 $ (197,544) $ 689,466 $ 1.19 $ 133,783 $ (44,381) $ 89,402 $ 0.15

Dietrich Domanski, Jonathan Kearns, Marco J. Lombardi and Hyun Song Shin

Alon USA Partners Reports Second Quarter Results

CHEVRON ISSUES INTERIM UPDATE FOR FOURTH QUARTER 2007

Paul Eisman President & Chief Executive Officer Credit Suisse Annual Energy Summit February 2015

Driven to Create Value

ALON USA ENERGY, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

FULL CORPORATE OFFER CIF-FOB-DIP & PAY

Transcription:

? Prospects for a Closer Brent/WTI Relationship in Europe Platts proposes adding U.S. crude to Brent assessment. Morningstar Commodities Research Oct. 15, 2018 Sandy Fielden Director, Oil and Products Research +1 512 431-8044 sandy.fielden@morningstar.com Data Sources for This Publication U.S. Energy Information Administration CME Group To discover more about the data sources used, click here. Delivered Pricing Alternatives for Export WTI Earlier this month, we detailed efforts by industry price-reporting agencies, or PRAs, and futures exchanges to provide Houston and Gulf Coast pricing contracts for growing U.S. crude exports (see Houston, We Need a Contract). These instruments assume international buyers provide their own tankers to pick up export crudes at Houston or other Gulf Coast ports or that delivery is made into the Houston pipeline/storage network. An alternate pricing mechanism would be based on delivery to a refining region outside the Gulf Coast such as northwest Europe or the Far East. In this follow-up note, we look at possible delivered pricing alternatives for U.S. exports of West Texas Intermediate crude. FOB or CIF Our previous analysis noted that most exports today are shipped from Gulf Coast ports, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Buyers price these transactions based on crude delivered free on board, or FOB, to tankers provided by the buyer at a Gulf Coast location or delivered to the destination region using a tanker provided by the seller, who pays for shipping cost, insurance, and freight, CIF. Most major equity producers and national oil companies transact their international sales on an FOB basis, leaving the buyer to arrange transport. Until recently, there was no liquid waterborne Gulf Coast FOB crude price, and traders had to use domestic crude pipeline prices instead. Pipeline prices have the advantage of liquidity and transparency, but their delivery mechanism of X thousand barrels/day over a month differs significantly from an FOB export, where 600 thousand barrels or more are delivered onto a tanker in three days or less. Pipeline pricing is governed by domestic market considerations, such as refinery demand, pipe capacity, and tariff rates. Waterborne prices are more heavily influenced by international supply/demand fundamentals. Added considerations in the U.S. export trade include differences in crude quality and consistency based on the origin of the barrels. Refiners prefer consistent quality from a known production stream, such as the current favorite Gulf Coast flavor field-grade WTI delivered from Midland, Texas. Dated Brent Rotterdam In September, Platts proposed changes to its industry benchmark North Sea Dated Brent assessment that is used as a price reference in about two thirds of the world s crude sales outside the United States. These proposals include using WTI Midland crude delivered to the Rotterdam, Netherlands, northwest Europe trading hub as one of the components making up the Dated Brent assessment. The Brent market is a complex mixture of spot and forward prices for individual North Sea crude streams, the Dated Brent assessment, and Brent futures traded on the London-based ICE exchange.

Page 2 of 6 Platts publishes daily FOB spot market assessments for dated cargoes of five North Sea crude streams, namely Brent Ninian Blend, Flotta, Oseberg, Ekofisk, and Troll. Dated cargoes represent parcels of production crude assigned to load dates between 10 days and a month ahead. The Platts Dated Brent assessment is the most competitive of these grades on any day based on price and quality adjustments. The Dated Brent assessment is the basis used by producers to sell crude into European as well as Asian markets with a negotiated premium or discount based on quality and market differences. Forward assessments are also published for trades involving crude parcels not yet assigned load dates (the Brent paper market). A Brent Index price calculated by ICE based on published assessments and futures exchange trades provides a link between the futures and physical market. Ongoing concerns about declining physical volumes of crude grades in the Dated Brent assessment (now covering about 900 thousand barrels/day of production) led to the September Platts proposal to broaden the benchmark s coverage. The proposal, open for industry comment until December, has two suggestions. The first is to broaden the range of Dated Brent transactions to include CIF cargoes delivered to Rotterdam in the Netherlands. The inclusion of CIF Rotterdam trades in the five North Sea grades would increase the liquidity behind the benchmark Dated Brent assessment. The second suggestion is to broaden the number of CIF Rotterdam crudes included in Dated Brent by adding similar grades from other regions, including Nigeria, Russia, and WTI from the United States. That would make WTI CIF Rotterdam part of the Dated Brent assessment. In this scenario, individual WTI cargoes would still be traded CIF northwest Europe, but these trades would also be considered part of the group of similar-quality light sweet crudes included in the Dated Brent benchmark assessment. Liquidity Such a Brent crude link to WTI in Europe would recognize the growing significance of U.S. crude exports to world supply. This makes sense, given Dated Brent is currently assessed based on 900 mb/d of North Sea production and U.S. crude exports so far in 2018 (through September) have averaged double that volume, or 1.8 million barrels a day, according to the Energy Information Administration. Linking WTI to the Brent market in northwest Europe also makes sense because Brent is widely traded and sits behind the second largest crude futures contract after CME WTI. Exhibit 1 shows quarterly average total volume and open interest traded on Brent ICE since 2000. Volumes in the past five years ranged from 0.5 to 1 million contracts/day and open interest has increased to over 2 million contracts/day. Each contract is 1,000 barrels of crude. Exhibit 1 Brent ICE Total Volume and Open Interest

million contracts Page 3 of 6 3 Total Volume Total Open Interest 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 Source: ICE, Morningstar Refiner's Delight Including WTI deliveries in the Dated Brent assessment would permit European refiners buying U.S. crude to better manage exposure to the spread between WTI prices in Houston and Brent in Europe. Brent and WTI are similar-quality light sweet crudes with differences in price largely based on location. Before the shale era when the U.S. imported significant light sweet crude at the Gulf Coast, Brent typically priced about $1/barrel below WTI delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, to account for the freight cost between the North Sea and U.S. Midwest refineries. Now U.S. refiners enjoy a surplus of domestic shale crude and rarely import light sweet cargoes. [Note: Brent and other light sweet crudes like Nigerian Bonny Light are still imported by East Coast refineries that don't have access to competitive shale supplies (see our July 2017 note East Coast Refineries Recover From Shale Loss ).] With WTI now an export-grade crude selling into Europe and Asia as well as to domestic refiners pricing for WTI is complicated by divergence between the export market at the Gulf Coast and the domestic market at Cushing, Oklahoma. We detailed this divergence as well as a third market for WTI crude in the Midland, Texas, producing region in a July note (see "The Permian Triangle and U.S. Crude Dynamics"). Although large spreads have recently opened between WTI prices in Midland, Cushing, and Houston, these are related to pipeline congestion out of the Permian Basin and have little impact on Houston export prices. So while WTI price spreads between Midland and Houston have blown out to more than $15/barrel lately (see our August note "The Permian Triangle - Midland Discounts Encourage Exports"), the spread between WTI Houston and Brent has traded in a narrower range between $1 and $3/barrel (Exhibit 2). For European WTI buyers, this Brent premium over Houston WTI is better managed by negotiating a delivered WTI price that fixes the freight cost. Including WTI in the Dated Brent

$/barrel Page 4 of 6 assessment makes hedging the final price more efficient by removing Brent/WTI volatility from the equation. Exhibit 2 Monthly Average Brent Premium Over WTI Houston 3.5 Brent Premium to WTI Houston (Monthly Average) 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Source: CME Group, Morningstar Sellers Beware For U.S. producers and sellers, a CIF northwest Europe price is less convenient than FOB Gulf Coast since it requires them to organize transport and bear the freight risk. In this case, their realized netback (destination price minus transport) would also be exposed to Brent prices if the Dated assessment included CIF WTI. And while the ICE provides liquidity and transparency for hedging, it is a less familiar instrument for U.S. sellers than using CME Nymex. Hedging transactions in the Brent market also adds timing risk between the Dated assessment and prompt futures that needs to be managed using relatively complex over the counter swaps known as contracts for difference. Because it is less attractive to the seller than the buyer, the use of a delivered northwest Europe price for WTI will therefore only be agreed to by sellers when buyers are scarce or when the seller wants to encourage a term contract that guarantees sales and keeps its customer buying on a regular basis. We expect these kind of term deals to develop over time and to include destination terms just like buying from the Saudis. In the short term, though, northwest Europe is a net buyer of crude so that refiners probably have less bargaining power over spot transactions. Asia Delivery An Asian equivalent delivered price mechanism that could provide similar buyer assurance to the European Brent market doesn t exist today. Current term crude sales to Asia by Middle East producers

Page 5 of 6 are based on FOB Brent pricing, or an average of FOB Dubai and Oman Mideast crude assessments. Hedging is limited to Brent Dubai swaps or the DMX Exchange Oman contract. Both Dubai and Oman are medium-sour crudes introducing a major quality differential into the price equation. Since the Asian market offers higher growth potential to U.S. exporters than Europe, there is an incentive to develop such an instrument. In the absence of an existing physical mechanism a WTI delivered Asia price marker could take years to develop. Its availability will be invaluable in building long-term relationships with Asian buyers. Slow Development As the U.S. crude export market takes off, we expect more producers and buyers to negotiate term deals that resemble the pricing basis used by other major suppliers. This process will start with the development of a liquid WTI FOB Houston or Gulf Coast market and could then expand to a delivered European price. Although a delivered Asia price is practically valuable, buyers and sellers will take time to agree on a WTI delivered Asia price mechanism. If U.S. exports follow precedent in the oil market, then the use of new instruments will develop more slowly than participants desire because it takes time to establish confidence in any new trading mechanism. In the meantime, we expect to see other proposals like Platts CIF Rotterdam emerge as buyers and sellers navigate the new market. K

Page 6 of 6 About Morningstar Commodities Research Morningstar Commodities Research provides independent, fundamental research differentiated by a consistent focus on the competitive dynamics in worldwide commodities markets. This joint effort between Morningstar's Research and Commodities & Energy groups leverages the expertise of Morningstar's 23 energy, utilities, basic materials, and commodities analysts as well as Morningstar's extensive data platform. Morningstar Commodities Research initially will focus on North American power and natural gas markets with plans to expand coverage of other markets worldwide. Morningstar, Inc. is a leading provider of independent investment research in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. The company offers an extensive line of products and services for individuals, financial advisors, and institutions. Morningstar's Commodities & Energy group provides superior quality market data and analytical products for energy data management systems, financial and agricultural data management, historical analysis, trading, risk management, and forecasting. For More Information +1 800 546-9646 North America +44 20 3194 1455 Europe commoditydata-sales@morningstar.com? 22 West Washington Street Chicago, IL 60602 USA 2018 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in the country in which its original distributor is based. The information, data, analyses, and opinions presented herein do not constitute investment advice; are provided solely for informational purposes and therefore are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete, or accurate. The opinions expressed are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice. Except as otherwise required by law, Morningstar shall not be responsible for any trading decisions, damages, or other losses resulting from, or related to, the information, data, analyses, or opinions or their use. References to "Morningstar Credit Ratings" refer to ratings issued by Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC, a credit rating agency registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization ("NRSRO"). Under its NRSRO registration, Morningstar Credit Ratings issues credit ratings on financial institutions (e.g., banks), corporate issuers, and asset-backed securities. While Morningstar Credit Ratings issues credit ratings on insurance companies, those ratings are not issued under its NRSRO registration. All Morningstar credit ratings and related analysis are solely statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or make any other investment decisions. Morningstar credit ratings and related analysis should not be considered without an understanding and review of our methodologies, disclaimers, disclosures, and other important information found at https://ratingagency.morningstar.com. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of Morningstar and may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, or used in any manner, without the prior written consent of Morningstar. To license the research, call +1 312 696-6869.