Broadband Readiness Index

Similar documents
Connect Every Acre Broadband Legislation. IUB Board Member Nick Wagner MARC - June 19, 2017

Docket ID: RUS-18-TELECOM-0004

Florida: An Economic Overview Focusing on County Differences

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Broadband and Employment: Does Speed Matter?

I submit the following testimony to urge the Committee s support for HB 2184 with the -6 amendments.

BROADBAND SUPPORT AND FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES:

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

New Jersey Counties by Region

Electronic Supplementary Material for the Article: The Impact of Internet Diffusion on Marriage Rates: Evidence from the Broadband Market

CAF USF ORDER: A-CAM IMPACTS

Alaska Telephone Association

2014 Memphis Poverty Fact Sheet (Data from 2013 ACS)

Missouri employment grew a total of 2.5% between 2004 and 2014, the 42 nd slowest rate among the 50 states.

Clay County Comprehensive Plan

First-time Homebuyers in Rural and Urban Pennsylvania

Did States Maximize Their Opportunity Zone Selections?

Dissertation Proposal Presentation

Summary of USF & ICC Reform Order & NPRM MOSS ADAMS LLP 1

Trend Analysis of Changes to Population and Income in Philadelphia, using American Community Survey (ACS) Data

Broadband Subscription and Internet Use in New Mexico

SuperNet and Broadband Update Eastern Alberta Trade Corridor Local to Global Forum

Testimony of Jeanne Shearer, Regional Vice President of State Government Affairs Windstream Communications, Inc.

The importance of ICT data to measure its economic impact

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE CONSUMER AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

STATE AND LOCAL TAXES SPENDING GUIDED READING

CLEAR CREEK AND GILPIN COUNTIES STRATEGIC BROADBAND PLAN

Exploring the Geography of College Opportunity

Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) Country Report Romania

Public Notice Page 1 of 2 INFORMATION REQUESTED BY MTS ALLSTREAM

The current study builds on previous research to estimate the regional gap in

NRRI Training for the Oklahoma Corporation Commission March 14-16, Topic 7. Telecommunications

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

Demographic and Economic Profile. Texas. Updated April 2006

Digital divide and broadband divide some multiple regression results

Regional Data Snapshot

THE TAX BURDEN IN ARIZONA

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

Demographic and Economic Trends in Rural America

Determinants of Federal and State Community Development Spending:

Pennsylvania. Demographic and Economic Profile. Metro and Nonmetro Counties in Pennsylvania

Exploring the Geography of College Opportunity

Population & Demographic Analysis

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators New York. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Measuring the Recession: An Impact Index

Town Profiles: Demographic, Economic, and Housing Statistics for De Smet City and Wall Town, SOuth Dakota

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

THE STATE OF WORKING ALABAMA

Economic Profile. Capital Crossroads. a vision forward

State Profile: Michigan

Page 1. Instructions for Completing FCC Form 481 OMB Control No (High-Cost) OMB Control No (Low-Income) November 2016

Florida: An Economic Overview

FCC USF REFORM LEGACY AND A-CAM SUPPORT. October 11, Presenters: Gary Smith JSI and Chad Duval Moss Adams

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators South Carolina. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

NCUA QUARTERLY U.S. MAP REVIEW Fourth Quarter 2016

For Information Contact: David Lasser, SIOR/CCIM

2016 Labor Market Profile

Demographic and Economic Profile. North Dakota. Updated June 2006

September Timothy D. McBride, PhD Washington University in St. Louis Brown School. RUPRI Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis

Six Pillars Data Appendix

2017 Regional Indicators Summary

Truth and Integrity in State Budgeting

NORTH MINNEAPOLIS: INTRODUCTION

HOUSING REPORT NORTHWEST MICHIGAN 3RD QUARTER 2018

State Profile: Colorado

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Independence, MO Data Profile 2015

Examining the Rural-Urban Income Gap. The Center for. Rural Pennsylvania. A Legislative Agency of the Pennsylvania General Assembly

Utah. Demographic and Economic Profile. Metro and Nonmetro Counties in Utah

Access to Care and the Economic Impact of Community Health Centers

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators United States. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

Minnesota s Economics & Demographics Looking To 2030 & Beyond. Tom Stinson, State Economist Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer July 2008

An Introduction to the American Community Survey Health Insurance Coverage Estimates

A Look at Tennessee Mortgage Activity: A one-state analysis of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Data

House Bill 3146 Ordered by the House July 1 Including House Amendments dated April 21 and July 1

Demographic and Economic Profile. Kentucky. Updated June 2006

Written for state Housing Finance Agencies (HFAs), this report furthers the work of the Innovations in Manufactured Homes (I M HOME) initiative s

Demographic and Economic Profile. Delaware. Updated December 2006

EXCELLENCE INNOVATION SERVICE VALUE

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan - Demographics Element Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 II. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

Connect America Fund Summary of Draft Report and Order, FNPRM and Order on Reconsideration Released Nov. 21, 2018

Household Income for States: 2010 and 2011

Demographic and Economic Profile. Nevada. Updated May 2006

Internal Auditor s Report. July 25, The County Council and County Executive of Wicomico County, Maryland:

State Handbook of Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Indicators New York. by David Baer PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE AARP

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. June 4, 2012 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Utah Independent Bank RSSD #

The High Cost of Segregation: Exploring the Relationship Between Racial Segregation and Subprime Lending

LIFELINE TELEPHONE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)

ECONOMY AT A GLANCE. Figure 1. Leading indices. 10/1711/1712/17 1/18 2/18 3/18 4/18 5/18 6/18 7/18 8/18 9/18 10/18 Mississippi

FINDINGS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE 2014

In Baltimore City today, 20% of households live in poverty, but more than half of the

The State of African American Homeownership in Oregon, 2000

Competitive Market Analysis

UCOA Accounting Manual Supplement for Phase I: Functional Level Information. Connecticut Office of Policy & Management

Tyler Area Economic Overview

Q Results & 2019 Financial Guidance Call. February 7, 2019

Demographic and Economic Profile. New Jersey. Updated December 2006

Transcription:

Broadband Readiness Index Connected Nation s Broadband Readiness Index measures how prepared each county across the nation is to meet the national broadband goals set by the White House and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The Broadband Readiness Index provides a transparent, easy- to- use means to benchmark how mature the broadband infrastructure in each community across the nation is information that will help trigger meaningful strategies to address the local broadband challenge. Using NTIA s National Broadband Map fall 2010 data across the nation s 3,219 counties in all 50 states, the District Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Connected Nation s Broadband Readiness Index focuses on three key metrics: wireline capacity at basic speeds, mobile wireless access, and high- capacity speeds greater than 50 Mbps. In particular, the Broadband Readiness Index compares county- level measured inventory with White House and FCC stated goals for broadband development: universal broadband access at least 4 Mbps download/1 Mbps upload speeds; near- ubiquitous mobile broadband to 98% U.S. households by 2016;1 and at least 50 Mbps broadband capacity to 100 million households by 2015.2 1 White House Press Release, 2/10/2011. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the- press- fice/2011/02/10/remarks- president- national- wireless- initiative- marquette- michigan 2 FCC s National Broadband Plan.

Table 1 Readiness Index Scale A 100% B 70.0% to 99.9% C 60.0% to 69.9% D 0.01% to 59.9% F 0% Based on these national goals, the readiness benchmark is as follows: 100% households served at 3 Mbps download/ 768 Kbps upload speeds, 3 98% households served by mobile service, and 85% households served by 50 Mbps download speed broadband service. 4 Connected Nation s Broadband Readiness Index assesses current attainment the three metric benchmarks by county and generates a readiness grade from A to F for each metric, as described in Table 1. Each county then receives an overall grade based on the average across the three metrics. Are Communities Across the Nation Ready to Meet the Broadband Goals? Based on Connected Nation s Broadband Readiness Index, over two- thirds all counties containing 91.6% all households receive a passing grade. By contrast, 32% counties containing approximately 8.4% the population receive a failing grade. Most communities are ready to meet the national broadband goals, but important challenges remain across counties in all 50 states and territories across the nation. Goals Met Only 115 counties, or less than 4% the 3,219 across the nation, receive an A and already meet the national broadband goals. These 115 counties represent almost a fourth the total population the country (24.6%). Household density in these counties is high, with 443.3 homes per square mile land, and they include some the nation s largest cities such as New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, and Atlanta. Prepared to Meet Goals A total 474 counties, or almost 15% all counties containing approximately 30% U.S. households, receive a B grade. Broadband inventory in these counties falls short the targeted benchmarks, but is in line to Readiness Table 2 Connected Nation s Broadband Readiness Index Number U.S. Households A 115 3.6% 24.6% B 474 14.7% 29.8% C 1,594 49.5% 37.2% D 1,007 31.3% 8.4% F 29 0.9% 0.09% Source: Readiness Index - Connected Nation. Demographic Data - U.S. Census, 2010 and GeoLytic, 2009. meet national goals in the coming years. The broadband challenge across these counties will likely be met by market forces. 3 This speed tier is the closest approximation available via NTIA s National Broadband Map data to the FCC s National Speed Target 4 Mbps download /1 Mbps upload speeds. 4 The National Broadband Plan target 100 million households served by 50 Mbps by 2015 equates to 85% all U.S. households in 2010. 2

Progress Remains Almost 50% all counties, or 1,594 counties containing 37% all U.S. households, receive a C grade. With a score between 60% and 70% the national broadband goals achieved, progress remains across these counties to meet the national goals in the coming years. Local and regional broadband awareness and stimulation programs along with targeted local private- public partnership initiatives can effectively help move these areas up the grade ladder to meet the national goals. Dire Challenge Ahead A total 1,007, or 31% all counties containing 8% U.S. households, have a failing grade D. Across these counties less than 60% the national broadband goals have been met, indicating a significant challenge to fulfill the national goals in the medium timeframe. Coordinated federal and state programs to help bridge the gap, complemented with targeted regional and local broadband stimulation programs, will be essential to address this challenge across these areas. Completely Unserved Only 29 counties across the nation, with less than one tenth one percent U.S. households, receive an F grade. These are counties where there is no measured terrestrial broadband access. These counties are primarily in remote areas Alaska, where 12 these counties are located, and other sparsely populated regions. What is Driving Broadband Readiness Across the Nation? Density households is the main driver readiness among counties. As expected, broadband providers have prioritized investment in robust broadband infrastructure in high- density, urban areas where the cost serving each customer is lowest. Readiness Number Table 3 Key Demographics by Broadband Readiness Index - Level U.S. Households Household Density Average Median Household Income Population Living Below Poverty Line Unemployment Rate Minority Population A 115 24.6% 443.3 $ 63,613 11.8% 8.7% 42.4% B 474 29.8% 78.5 $ 50,307 12.3% 10.2% 38.1% C 1,594 37.2% 29.6 $ 42,360 14.6% 9.4% 27.7% D 1,007 8.4% 7.9 $ 37,494 18.7% 10.7% 21.7% F 29 0.09% 0.4 $ 47,086 15.1% 8.4% 25.8% National 3,219 100% 33.3 $ 42,810 13.5% 9.6% 34.1% Sources: Readiness Index - Connected Nation. U.S. Households - U.S. Census, 2010 and GeoLytic, 2009. Household Density U.S. Census, 2010 for Households, 2000 Census and Colorado Department Local Affairs, 2007 for Land Area. Medium Household Income, Minority Population and Population Living Below the Poverty Line American Community Survey, 2005-2009. Unemployment Rates Bureau Labor Statistics, Feb. 2011. 3

Density population is the most significant factor driving the Broadband Readiness Index. The household density across counties with an A grade is 443.3 homes per square mile, indicating highly populated, urban areas. Household density across counties with a B grade is 78.5 homes per square mile. These areas are a combination urban and suburban, with household density significantly above the national average 33.3 homes per square mile. In contrast, counties with a failing grade D have on average only 7.9 homes per square mile, and counties with an F grade have 0.4 homes per square mile. Households in counties with grades D and F are in primarily rural, sparsely populated areas. There is a positive correlation between income and the Broadband Readiness Index, where a high Broadband Readiness Index score equates to higher average median household incomes. Similarly, counties with higher grades have lower levels population living under the poverty line. This is true for all grades except the failing F grade. However, 12 the 29 counties with an F grade are located in Alaska, where idiosyncratic income patterns exist that could be responsible for this anomaly. age minority population does appear to play a role in the Broadband Readiness Index, where high scores equate to higher percentage minority populations. Forty- two percent residents are classified as minority across counties receiving an A, and 38% in counties with a B grade. By contrast, fewer than 22% residents are minorities in counties with a D grade, and 26% across counties receiving an F. Such patterns may be explained by the higher concentration minorities in urban areas, where, in turn, the Broadband Readiness Index is highest. The unemployment rate does not appear to be driving the Broadband Readiness Index, since there is no correlation unemployment rates across counties with different grades. How is the Broadband Readiness Index Relevant to the Local Community? The Broadband Readiness Index can be a catalyst for action across a community. Connected Nation is working with communities across the nation to measure and identify the local challenge and promote action to fill the gaps and expand broadband resources. Nacogdoches County, East Texas, with a failing grade D, is home to the town Chireno where in mid- 2010 the National Broadband Map program revealed 99% homes had no fixed broadband service available. Working with Connected Nation, this tactical information prompted local leaders, including local elected ficials, media, and residents, to seek a regional broadband provider that would be willing to expand into their community. In September 2010, broadband provider East Texas DSL erected a new WiMAX tower that today provides broadband service to the community. This new inventory will be reflected in future bi- annual iterations the Broadband Readiness Index and help Chireno leadership understand where their community stands in the race to meet the national broadband challenge. 4

Leelanau County, Lower Peninsula Michigan, a community on the shores Lake Michigan close to Traverse City, has a passing grade C. In this community the Broadband Readiness Index and broadband inventory have helped connect consumers who thought they were Community Table 4 Broadband Readiness Index by Metric 3 Mbps Download Speed Mobile Wireless 50 Mbps Download Speed Overall Nacogdoches County, TX B B F D Leelanau County, MI B B F C Perry County, TN B B F D Source: Connected Nation. unserved with existing WiMAX solutions, and today they are fully benefiting from high- speed Internet. This increased subscribership will help strengthen business cases to continue investing in ever faster and more ubiquitous broadband capacity. Real estate entrepreneurs in the Traverse City area, fully aware the impact high- capacity broadband on home prices, use the Broadband Readiness Index and broadband maps to showcase value and increase awareness for the need ever greater broadband capacity. Perry County, Western Tennessee, has a failing grade D. After the loss a major employer, in mid- 2010 Perry County had the nation s second highest unemployment rate at 25.4%. Community leaders searched for new growth opportunities and, with the help private- public partnerships, has created a Digital Factory where citizens can receive training in IT skills and use local computing centers to provide IT services to remote customers who they are able to serve through the digital highway. The maturity the broadband network is essential to sustain and help grow this nascent local telework industry. Through the Broadband Readiness Index and the broadband map, local leadership is able to assess the present and plan for the future infrastructure growth needed to keep the community online and on track. 5