The Knowledge Problem

Similar documents
Politics and Economics: The Struggle of Reason with Emotion

Deficit Day to Bankruptcy Day

ECON 256: Poverty, Growth & Inequality. Jack Rossbach

Taxes and Gimmicks. Antony Davies Duquesne University.

Law and Economic Justice

ECON 256: Poverty, Growth & Inequality. Jack Rossbach

Economics 448: Lecture 14 Measures of Inequality

ECON 1100 Global Economics (Fall 2013) The Distribution Function of Government portions for Exam 3

THIRD EDITION. ECONOMICS and. MICROECONOMICS Paul Krugman Robin Wells. Chapter 18. The Economics of the Welfare State

Poverty and Inequality in the Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States

Income inequality an insufficient consumption in China. Li Gan Southwestern University of Finance and Economics Texas A&M University

The US Economy: A Global View Part II. So the American economy needs the world, and the world needs the American economy.

The Moldovan experience in the measurement of inequalities

Topic 11: Measuring Inequality and Poverty

Poverty, Inequality, and Discrimination. Wen-Jui Han New York University

Income Inequality and Poverty

Poverty, Inequity and Inequality in New Zealand

Using Refundable Tax Credits to Help Lowincome

SKEMA BUSINESS SCHOOL Global risk and the mounting wealth gap Michel Henry Bouchet

Income Inequality and Poverty (Chapter 20 in Mankiw & Taylor; reading Chapter 19 will also help)

Income Distribution and Poverty

Income and Wealth Inequality A Lack of Equity

Source: Oxfam Issue Briefing, Having It All and Wanting More, January 2015

Inequality: Why should we care?

Poverty and Social Transfers in Hungary

Central Administration for Statistics and World Bank

The Impact of Taxation and Public Expenditure on Income Distribution in Indonesia

1 Income Inequality in the US

Medicaid Insurance and Redistribution in Old Age

Understanding Income Distribution and Poverty

Resolved: Student loans should be limited to those students and amounts that are highly likely to be repaid in full.

2.6 Wealth Inequality in America Focus Question

METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN POVERTY RESEARCH

Capitalism, Inequality & Globalization. Public University of Navarre Pamplona, Spain May 21 st 2018 J. E. Stiglitz

Inequality in China: Recent Trends. Terry Sicular (University of Western Ontario)

Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Concepts and Measurement

Recall the idea of diminishing marginal utility of income. Recall the discussion that utility functions are ordinal rather than cardinal.

CHAPTER 9 DISTRIBUTION: EXCHANGE AND TRANSFER Microeconomics in Context (Goodwin, et al.), 2 nd Edition

Where Does the Money Go?

Econ 102: Lecture Notes #7. Human Capital. John Knowles University of Pennsylvania. October 6th, 2004

Maurizio Franzini and Mario Planta

Second Hour Exam Public Finance Fall, Answers

9) According to research, which of the following countries is the strongest supporter of free markets? A) China B) India C) France D) Ukraine

Inequality and Social Mobility. Econ 101

Why the Next US Recession Could Be Worse Than the Last

ECONOMIC COMMENTARY. Income Inequality Matters, but Mobility Is Just as Important. Daniel R. Carroll and Anne Chen

Economic Standard of Living

Poverty, Inequality and the Welfare State

The Economy Today 14th Edition SOLUTIONS MANUAL Schiller Gebhardt

Intergenerational Transfers and Old-Age Security in Korea

Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory. Costas Azariadis. Costas Azariadis. Lecture 3: Productivity and Labor

Harnessing Demographic Dividend: The Future We Want

Optimal Taxation : (c) Optimal Income Taxation

Distributive Impact of Low-Income Support Measures in Japan

Income Changes in Metro Atlanta: Meandering Through The Research

U.S. Income Inequality: It s Not So Bad

INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND POVERTY IN THE OECD AREA: TRENDS AND DRIVING FORCES

Economic Standard of Living

THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL TRANSFERS ON POVERTY IN ARMENIA. Abstract

GDP can be measured in mainly two ways. 1. Income Approach. 2. Expenditure Approach. Expenditure Approach:

Basic Macroeconomics Relationships. Business, Computers, & Information Technology

Poverty and social inclusion indicators

Exploring Lognormal Income Distributions 11 Oct, 2014

Economic Impacts of Basic Income in Korea --Multiplier and Redistribution effect

Brazil. Poverty profile. Country profile. Country profile. November

Lecture 13: Efficiency vs. Equity & International Trade

Inequality and Poverty in Japan. Toshiaki TACHIBANAKI Japanese Economic Review 57(1), March 2006

Table 1. Job growth in Ames, Des Moines, and Iowa, June 2010 June 2016 since 2015 since 2014 since Des Moines Iowa Ames. Des Moines Iowa Ames

Introduction to International Economics Update to Chapter 20 Growth

Labor Markets, Poverty, and Income Distribution. Chapter 12. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Copyright 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Labor Markets, Poverty, and Income Distribution. Chapter 12. Learning Objectives

Chapter Outline. Chapter 6 Every Macroeconomic Word You Have Ever Heard: Gross Domestic Product, Inflation, Unemployment, Recession and Depression

arxiv: v2 [q-fin.ec] 1 Sep 2014

Wealth inequality and accumulation. John Hills, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics

The Impact of Social Security Reform on Low-Income Workers

Brian Nolan University of Oxford APPAM-UNED Conference Segovia September 2014

Measuring Unemployment Economic Growth and Productivity. unemployed. News

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION. having a higher poverty rate at the same time. The World Bank reported that some

Unemployment. What are the different types of unemployment? How are unemployment rates determined? What is full employment?

Poverty and income inequality

How does social mobility in the United States compare to that in Britain? Why do you think this is so? References. Multiple Choice

CIE Economics A-level

Redistribution via VAT and cash transfers: an assessment in four low and middle income countries

Minimum Wage as a Poverty Reducing Measure

Table 13.1 shows the top 10 wealthiest people in the United States in 2006 and These names come from lists

THE IMPACT OF CASH AND BENEFITS IN-KIND ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN INDONESIA

Poverty, Inequality, and Development

Economic Standard of Living

Social Situation Monitor - Glossary

Real Median Family Income is Falling. Family incomes have stagnated since the mid-1980s. Income in 2012 ($51,017) is lower than in 1989 ($51,681).

The 2008 Statistics on Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage by Gary Burtless THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION

QUESTIONNAIRE A I. MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS (4 points each)

Income and Wealth Inequality in OECD Countries

Economic Standard of Living

Inequality and Redistribution

For release at 2:00 p.m., EDT, September 26, 2018

1. Poverty and social inclusion indicators

DECEMBER State of Working Vermont

turn the Fear of Losing Money

Entitlement Reform and the Future of Pensions

Transcription:

The Knowledge Problem March 28, 2014 copies of this presentation can be found at www.antonydavies.org www.antonydavies.org 1

The Players and the Goals In this experiment, each of you is a member of a community. You have skills with which your produce either 12 units of Red or 12 units of Blue stuff. www.antonydavies.org 2

The Players and the Goals You eat both Red and Blue stuff to gain happiness. The more you eat, the happier you are. www.antonydavies.org 3

Blue Chips The Players and the Goals Suppose you have 5 Red chips and 4 Blue chips. Your happiness is 123. Red Chips 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 16 22 26 31 35 39 43 47 50 2 0 20 32 43 53 62 70 78 86 93 100 3 0 30 49 65 79 93 105 117 129 140 150 4 0 40 65 86 106 123 140 156 171 186 200 5 0 50 81 108 132 154 175 195 214 233 251 6 0 60 97 129 158 185 210 234 257 279 301 7 0 70 114 151 185 216 245 273 300 326 351 8 0 80 130 173 211 247 280 312 343 372 401 9 0 90 146 194 238 278 315 351 386 419 451 10 0 100 162 216 264 309 351 390 429 466 501 www.antonydavies.org 4

Controlled Economy A benevolent dictator will take the stuff that the people produce and distribute it among the people. The dictator s goal is to maximize the sum of the people s happinesses. www.antonydavies.org 5

www.antonydavies.org 6

Chaos Chaos Free to act Free market Free to act provided you don t harm others All of the stuff you produced is at the front of the room. Come and take what you want. www.antonydavies.org 7

Free Market Free to act but you may not violate others property rights. Each person starts with either 12 Blue stuff or 12 Red stuff. You may trade with other people in an attempt to maximize your happiness. www.antonydavies.org 8

www.antonydavies.org 9

Results www.antonydavies.org 10

Total Happiness (by economic system) 36000 34000 32000 30000 28000 26000 24000 22000 20000 Command Economy Chaos Free Economy www.antonydavies.org 11

Total Happiness (by economic system) 36000 34000 32000 30000 28000 26000 24000 22000 20000 Command Economy Chaos Free Economy Ideal www.antonydavies.org 12

Gini Inequality Index 0.000 Ukraine Mexico 1.000 0.264 U.S. 0.450 0.483 Haiti 0.592 www.antonydavies.org 13

Command Economy Gini Inequality Index: 0.177 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 People Arranged in Order of Happiness (Command Economy) www.antonydavies.org 14

Chaos Gini Inequality Index: 0.428 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 People Arranged in Order of Happiness (Chaos) www.antonydavies.org 15

Free Economy Gini Inequality Index: 0.168 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 People Arranged in Order of Happiness (Free Economy) www.antonydavies.org 16

Conclusion The knowledge problem prevents the benevolent dictator from achieving the best outcome. www.antonydavies.org 17

Conclusion The knowledge problem prevents the benevolent dictator from achieving the best outcome. Corollary Government does have a role to play in protecting property rights. www.antonydavies.org 18

Is the experiment a fair representation of the real world? www.antonydavies.org 19

Experiment versus Real World Information Experiment: The dictator didn t know what made people happy. Real World: The dictator won t know what makes people happy. Changing Information Experiment: People s preferences were constant. Real World: People s preferences are constantly changing. www.antonydavies.org 20

Experiment versus Real World Decisions Experiment: The dictator had to make under 60 decisions in ten minutes 6 per minute. Real World: A dictator would have to make 300 m. x (maybe ten?) = 3 billion decisions daily 2 million per minute. Quantifiability Experiment: The preference data was quantifiable. Real World: Most preferences aren t easily quantifiable. www.antonydavies.org 21

Experiment versus Real World Motivation Experiment: The dictator was altruistic. Real World: Good luck with that. Conclusion It should be easier for the dictator to satisfy people s wants in the experiment than in the real world. www.antonydavies.org 22

Assumptions About Economic Freedom Command Market Assumptions: Left to themselves, people will consolidate power, stifle competition, exploit each other, and confiscate wealth. Free Market Assumptions: Left to themselves, people will disseminate power, promote competition, cooperate with each other, and create wealth. www.antonydavies.org 23

More badness If the command market assumptions were correct, then we would expect to see patterns in the data like this More freedom Freedom www.antonydavies.org 24

Less goodness and this. More freedom Freedom www.antonydavies.org 25

Economic Freedom of North America Economic Freedom of the World Size of government Government consumption Transfers and subsidies Social Security payments Takings and discriminatory taxes Tax revenue Top marginal income tax rate and threshold Other tax revenues Labor market freedom Minimum wage Public sector employment Union density www.antonydavies.org 26

For each year, divide the states into two groups 25 least free 25 most free www.antonydavies.org 27

Economic Freedom of North America States Always Among the 25 Least Free States: 1985 2009 www.antonydavies.org 28

Economic Freedom of North America States Always Among the 25 Most Free States: 1985 2009 www.antonydavies.org 29

Economic Freedom of North America States That Switched Groups At Least Once: 1985 2009 Average state switched groups 3 times. www.antonydavies.org 30

Employment www.antonydavies.org 31

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Data Source: Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 32

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Data Source: Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 33

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Data Source: Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 34

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Less free: 5.8% More free: 5.2% The difference in unemployment rates = 1 million jobs. Data Source: Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 35

Income and Growth www.antonydavies.org 36

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Income Tables: Households, Table H-8; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 37

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Income Tables: Households, Table H-8; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 38

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Income Tables: Households, Table H-8; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 39

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Less free: $35,300 More free: $38,000 Median household income averaged $4,000 more in the most free states. Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Income Tables: Households, Table H-8; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 40

Poverty www.antonydavies.org 41

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Less free: 13.6% More free: 11.9% The difference in poverty rates = 5 million people living in poverty. Data source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, GDP and Personal Income Regional Data; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 42

Do these results hold across countries?? www.antonydavies.org 43

Child Labor www.antonydavies.org 44

Economic Freedom of the World (75 reporting countries, 2000-2009) Less free: 28% More free: 13% Data source: Childinfo.org, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 45

Economic Freedom of the World (75 reporting countries, 2000-2009) Less free: 28% More free: 13% Data source: Childinfo.org, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 46

Economic Freedom of the World Big country effect? www.antonydavies.org 47

Economic Freedom of the World (45 below median income countries, 2000-2009) Less free: 36% More free: 17% Data source: Childinfo.org, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 48

Economic Freedom of the World (26 poorest quartile countries, 2000-2009) Less free: 41% More free: 27% Data source: Childinfo.org, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 49

Environment www.antonydavies.org 50

Economic Freedom of the World (85 countries, 2007) Less free: 85 More free: 30 Data source: World Health Organization, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 51

CO 2 Metric Tons per $1000 GDP Economic Freedom of the World (118 countries, 2000) Less free: 2.5 More free: 0.5 Data source: World Resource Institute (World Bank), Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 52

Economic Freedom of the World (136 countries, 1990-2005) Less free: 7% More free: +7% Data source: Mongabay.com, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 53

Economic Freedom of the World Big country effect? www.antonydavies.org 54

Economic Freedom of the World (29 poorest quartile countries, 1990-2005) Less free: 13% More free: 7% Data source: Mongabay.com, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 55

Peace www.antonydavies.org 56

Global Peace Index (inverse scale) Economic Freedom of the World (133 countries, 2009) Data source: Institute for Economics and Peace, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 57

Global Peace Index (inverse scale) Economic Freedom of the World (133 countries, 2009) Countries that are more free are also more peaceful. Data source: Institute for Economics and Peace, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 58

Poverty, and Inequality www.antonydavies.org 59

Economic Freedom of the World (79 countries, 2000-2010) Less free: 59% More free: 17% Data source: World Bank, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 60

Economic Freedom of the World Big country effect? www.antonydavies.org 61

Economic Freedom of the World (25 poorest quartile countries, 2000-2010) Less free: 81% More free: 64% Data source: World Bank, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 62

Poverty figures only measure the lower extreme. What about income inequality? www.antonydavies.org 63

Per-Capita Income Can Hide Inequality Average = $40,000 Average = $40,000 www.antonydavies.org 64

No one ever died from income inequality. www.antonydavies.org 65

Economic Freedom of the World (123 countries, 1995-2009) www.antonydavies.org 66

Economic Freedom of the World (123 countries, 1995-2009) Less free: 43 More free: 35 Data source: CIA World Factbook, Economic Freedom of the World, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 67

Economic Freedom of North America That inequality thing happens in the U.S. also! www.antonydavies.org 68

Economic Freedom of North America (all levels of government) Data source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey, B19083; Ashby, Bueno, and McMahon, Economic Freedom of North America 2011, Fraser Institute www.antonydavies.org 69

Correlation Causation Data don t show that economic freedom causes goodness. www.antonydavies.org 70

No Correlation No Causation Data do show that economic freedom doesn t cause badness. www.antonydavies.org 71

Conclusions Across states, across countries, and across time, societies with more economic freedom have Less unemployment More income Less poverty Less income inequality Better environmental outcomes www.antonydavies.org 72

The Knowledge Problem March 28, 2014 copies of this presentation can be found at www.antonydavies.org www.antonydavies.org 73

But Free people will act selfishly! www.antonydavies.org 74

More freedom greater ability to act selfishly, greater ability to harm each other, greater ability to harm the environment. More freedom greater ability to act altruistically, greater ability to help each other, greater ability to protect the environment. www.antonydavies.org 75

Appropriate role for government is in preventing people from harming each other. More freedom greater ability to act selfishly, greater ability to harm each other, greater ability to harm the environment. More freedom greater ability to act altruistically, greater ability to help each other, greater ability to protect the environment. www.antonydavies.org 76

We have to do something! The rich are getting richer while the poor get poorer! www.antonydavies.org 77

U.S. Households According to Income 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Under $15,000 $15,000 - $25,000 $25,000 - $35,000 $35,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $75,000 $75,000 - $100,000 Over $100,000 Incomes are in 2009 dollars. 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1995-2012. www.antonydavies.org 78

U.S. Households According to Income 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Under $15,000 $15,000 - $25,000 $25,000 - $35,000 $35,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $75,000 $75,000 - $100,000 Over $100,000 Incomes are in 2009 dollars. 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1995-2012. www.antonydavies.org 79

U.S. Households According to Income 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Under $15,000 $15,000 - $25,000 $25,000 - $35,000 $35,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $75,000 $75,000 - $100,000 Over $100,000 Incomes are in 2009 dollars. 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1995-2012. www.antonydavies.org 80

U.S. Households According to Income 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Under $15,000 $15,000 - $25,000 $25,000 - $35,000 $35,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $75,000 $75,000 - $100,000 Over $100,000 Incomes are in 2009 dollars. 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1995-2012. www.antonydavies.org 81

U.S. Households According to Income 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Under $15,000 $15,000 - $25,000 $25,000 - $35,000 $35,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $75,000 $75,000 - $100,000 Over $100,000 Incomes are in 2009 dollars. 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1995-2012. www.antonydavies.org 82

Problems with Inequality Measures Assumes that the pie is fixed. Assumes that the population is stagnant. www.antonydavies.org 83

Fraction of Total Income Received by Each Fifth 50% 45% 40% 46.6% 49.7% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% In 2000, the poorest Americans earned 3.8% of all income. 3.8% In 2007, the poorest Americans earned 3.4% of all income. 3.4% 0% Poorest Lowest Quintile Highest Richest Quintile 2000 2007 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010, Table 678. www.antonydavies.org 84

Fraction of Total Income Received by Each Fifth 50% 45% 40% 46.6% 49.7% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% The Pie Isn t Fixed 2000 RGDP = $11,216 b. x 3.8% = $425 b. 2007 RGDP = $13,206 b. x 3.4% = $450 b. 10% 5% 3.8% 3.4% 0% Poorest Lowest Quintile Highest Richest Quintile 2000 2007 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010, Table 678. www.antonydavies.org 85

Average Age 70 65.7 66.8 60 50 40 30 20 In 2000, the youngest Americans were 7.1 years old. In 2010, the youngest Americans were 6.9 years old. 10 7.1 6.9 0 Youngest Lowest Quintile Highest Oldest Quintile 2000 2010 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010, Tables 8, 9. www.antonydavies.org 86

Average Age 70 65.7 66.8 60 50 40 30 The Population Isn t Stagnant The young grew up and were replaced. 20 10 7.1 6.9 0 Youngest Lowest Quintile Highest Oldest Quintile 2000 2010 Data source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010, Tables 8, 9. www.antonydavies.org 87

Inequality and the Gini-Coefficient Line up people from poorest to richest. Total income = $1 million These people earn a total of $200,000 These people earn a total of $400,000 These people earn a total of $300,000 These people earn a total of $100,000 www.antonydavies.org 88

Inequality and the Gini-Coefficient Line up people from poorest to richest. Total income = $1 million These people earn 20% of all income. These people earn 40% of all income. These people earn 30% of all income. These people earn 10% of all income. www.antonydavies.org 89

Inequality and the Gini-Coefficient Line up people from poorest to richest. Total income = $1 million These people earn 20% of all income. These people earn 40% of all income. These people earn 30% of all income. These people earn 10% of all income. www.antonydavies.org 90

Median Income Within Each Quintile (2006$) $120,000 $100,000 25% 0% $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 100% 52% 27% $20,000 $0 Bottom Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Top Quintile Parents Children Source: Pew Economic Mobility Project www.antonydavies.org 91

Median Income Within Each Quintile (2006$) $120,000 $100,000 25% 0% $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 + 100% 52% 27% $20,000 $0 Bottom Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Top Quintile Parents Children Source: Pew Economic Mobility Project www.antonydavies.org 92

Median Income Within Each Quintile (2006$) $120,000 $100,000 25% 0% $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 + 100% + 52% 27% $20,000 $0 Bottom Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Top Quintile Parents Children Source: Pew Economic Mobility Project www.antonydavies.org 93

Median Income Within Each Quintile (2006$) $120,000 $100,000 25% 0% $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 + 100% + 52% + 27% $20,000 $0 Bottom Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Top Quintile Parents Children Source: Pew Economic Mobility Project www.antonydavies.org 94

Median Income Within Each Quintile (2006$) $120,000 $100,000 + 25% + 0% $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 + 100% + 52% + 27% $20,000 $0 Bottom Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Top Quintile Parents Children Source: Pew Economic Mobility Project www.antonydavies.org 95

Employment Measures Population Non-working age population Working age population Institutionalized Non-institutionalized Non-employed Labor Force Unemployed Employed Unemployment Rate = Unemployed / Labor Force www.antonydavies.org 96

Employment Measures Population Non-working age population Working age population Institutionalized Non-employed Non-institutionalized 20 100 Labor Force Unemployment Rate = 10 / 100 = 10% 90 people employed Unemployed 10 90 Employed Suppose 2 unemployed people become discouraged. www.antonydavies.org 97

Employment Measures Population Non-working age population Working age population Institutionalized Non-employed Non-institutionalized Labor Force 20 + 2 = 22 100 2 = 98 Unemployed Employed Unemployment Rate = 8 / 98 = 8.2% 10 2 = 8 90 Unemployment rate drops from 10% to 8.2%, yet the same 90 people are working. www.antonydavies.org 98

Employment Measures Reported unemployment rate Data Source: freelunch.com www.antonydavies.org 99

Employment Measures Unemployment rate after adding back discouraged workers The Year of Weirdness Reported unemployment rate Data Source: freelunch.com www.antonydavies.org 100