Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboard CMSP

Similar documents
Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboard Riverside

Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboard Santa Cruz

Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboard Tulare

Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboard San Mateo

Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboard Orange

Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboard San Diego

Profile of Ohio s Medicaid-Enrolled Adults and Those who are Potentially Eligible

State and Federal Health Care Reform in Alameda County:

Healthy Michigan Plan signing, September 2013

AIDS Drug Assistance Program. Improving Health... Promoting Wellness

California s New Low Income Health Programs (LIHPs)

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

SMALL AREA ESTIMATES OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE:

Covered California Delivering on the Promise of Care. State of Reform Health Policy Conference Anne Price November 6, 2015

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

Arkansas Works (formerly Health Care Independence Program Private Option )

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

Jackie Prokop, RN, MHA Director Program Policy Division Medical Services Administration Michigan Department of Health and Human Services

HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACES 2016 OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD: JANUARY ENROLLMENT REPORT For the period: November 1 December 26, January 7, 2016

MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)

CMSP Data Update: Tuolumne County - December 2009

Evaluation of Wisconsin s BadgerCare Plus Health Care Coverage Program

City of Los Angeles Periodic Utilization Report 3rd Quarter 2017 (10/1/2016 9/30/2017)

NEWLY ENROLLED MEMBERS IN THE INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MARKET AFTER HEALTH CARE REFORM: THE EXPERIENCE FROM 2014 AND 2015

Board of Directors October 2018 and YTD Financial Report

The Impact of Program Changes on Health Care for the OHP Standard Population: Early Results from a Prospective Cohort Study

The Affordable Care Act and Covered California. A Guide for Health Care Providers

Arkansas Works Overview. Work And Community Engagement Requirement

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

PENT-UP HEALTH CARE DEMAND AFTER THE ACA

How Medicaid Enrollees Fare Compared with Privately Insured and Uninsured Adults

Understanding Pay For Performance and DIR Impact to Pharmacy Reimbursement

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. January 2019

Health Insurance Coverage in the District of Columbia

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

Issue Brief. Does Medicaid Make a Difference? The COMMONWEALTH FUND. Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2014

Yang Jiang Sonji Harrington

Setting Capitation Rates in a Changing Medicaid Market

Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. CSP Membership (as at 1 st March 2018) & NHS Data (2009 to 2017) UK/England /N Ireland/Scotland/Wales

Sara R. Collins, Ph.D. Vice President, Health Care Coverage and Access The Commonwealth Fund. Alliance for Health Reform Briefing July 11, 2014

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

Research & Policy Brief Number 4 December 2009

The Oklahoma Tier Payment System (ETPS)

Implications/Impact of Healthcare Reform and Parity for Behavioral Health. Sacramento County September 2, 2010 Sandra Naylor Goodwin, PhD

The Kidney Health Care Program Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Report

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. October 2018

2016 ELIGIBILITY and PREMIUM RULES

Disease Management Initiative. Legislative Authorization. Program Objectives

Table 1. Underinsured Indicators Among Adults Ages Insured All Year, 2003, 2005, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016

What does your Community look like and how is it changing?

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

Medicare Advantage: Early Views and Trend Spotting: What We Know From Analyzing Public Data Files

Since 2014, California implemented multiple program changes and expansions, bringing millions of uninsured Californians into coverage, including:

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. October 2017

The Affordable Care Act in Action. Carla Haddad, MPH The Health Resources and Services Administration Office of Planning, Analysis and Evaluation

C H A R T B O O K. Members Dually Eligible for MaineCare and Medicare Benefits MaineCare and Medicare Expenditures and Utilization

THDA STIMULUS SECOND MORTGAGE PROGRAM REPORT

Active Membership An Evolving Picture. October 8, 2015

Understanding Your Medicare Options. Medicare Made Clear

BTP Stop and Search Data - August 2012

Part III: Plan Design

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

Webinar: CMSP Low Income Health Program (LIHP) County Medical Services Program Governing Board Presented on April 14 & 20, 2011

A Medicare Information

Technical Appendix. This appendix provides more details about patient identification, consent, randomization,

ACCELERATING CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT (ACE) Bridging the Gap. U.S. Department of Labor Workforce Innovation Fund (WIF)

HealthStats HIDI A TWO-PART SERIES ON WOMEN S HEALTH PART ONE: THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE JANUARY 2015

Class 8 - Medicaid. Ellen Andrews, PhD PCH 358 SCSU Spring 2018

Expanding Health Benefit Eligibility: Impacts on the IHSS Workforce

Affordable Care Act and Covered CA: Where We are One Year Later. Wonha Kim, MD, MPH, CPH, FAAP

Health Insurance and Children s Well-Being

August Summary: Senate Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA) Incorporating The Graham- Cassidy- Heller Amendment

March MEDICAID & CHIP Enrollment Service Use & Payments

HEDIS CAHPS HEALTH PLAN SURVEY, ADULT AND CHILD Beneficiary Satisfaction Survey Results

Affordable Care Act Overview and the Role of Schools

Pay or Play Penalties Look-back Measurement Method Examples

Presenters Marc J. Smith Mary-Michal Rawling

OTHER DEPOSITS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DEPOSIT BARKAT SAVING ACCOUNT

PRESS RELEASE. Securities issued by Hungarian residents and breakdown by holding sectors. April 2016

Financial Statements For Seven Months Ended January 2014 (Unaudited)

INDIVIDUAL SHARED RESPONSIBILITY PROVISION

Summary of Healthy Indiana Plan: Key Facts and Issues

Medicaid and Access To Care: Implications of DRA. Donna A. Boswell November Be Careful What You Wish For

White Pine County. Economic and Demographic Profile, 1999

A Profile of African Americans, Latinos, and Whites with Medicare: Implications for Outreach Efforts for the New Drug Benefit.

The Impact of Program Changes on Enrollment, Access, and Utilization in the Oregon Health Plan Standard Population

The Uninsured at the Starting Line in California: California findings from the 2013 Kaiser Survey of Low-Income Americans and the ACA

Medicare Made Simple. A guide to your health plan options

QUARTERLY REPORT AND CERTIFICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER For Quarter Ending June 30, 2009 COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

MDwise Annual IHCP Seminar. Exclusively serving Indiana families since 1994.

Special Enrollment Periods

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

MNsure Metrics Dashboard. Prepared for Board of Directors Meeting July16, 2014

kaiser medicaid commission on and the uninsured How Will Health Reform Impact Young Adults? By Karyn Schwartz and Tanya Schwartz Executive Summary

Implementation of the Affordable Care Act in California

2018:IIIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

MNsure Metrics Dashboard

Medicaid Expansion and Behavioral Health. Suzanne Fields Senior Advisor to the Administrator on Health Care Financing SAMHSA

Transcription:

Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboard CMSP January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2013

About the Low Income Health Program The Low Income Health Program (LIHP), authorized under the 2010 Bridge to Reform 1115 Medicaid Waiver, is an optional program implemented by counties or other governmental entities, offering health care coverage to low income uninsured adults. LIHP includes two components distinguished by family income level: Medicaid Coverage Expansion (MCE) for non-elderly adults with family incomes at or below 133% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), and Health Care Coverage Initiative (HCCI) for non-elderly adults with family incomes from 133.01 through 200% FPL. Local LIHPs can set the income levels below the maximum allowable amount, but must operate an MCE in order to implement a new HCCI. Standard program eligibility criteria are established by the waiver Special Terms and Conditions: Resident of participating county Adult, age 19 through 64 Not eligible for Medicaid or CHIP Not pregnant US Citizen, or Legal Permanent Resident with at least 5 years in the US Income at or below 200% of the FPL (or less based on county eligibility standards) 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 2

About the Evaluation The UCLA Center for Health Policy Research is contracted to conduct an independent evaluation of the Low Income Health Program, as required by the Special Terms and Conditions. A primary goal of the evaluation is to provide timely feedback of evaluation findings to LIHPs and other stakeholders. The LIHP Performance Dashboard reports are produced on a quarterly basis and contain standard metrics describing program performance in enrollment and health care services. This dashboard is specific to CMSP, for the time period January 1, 2012 December 31, 2013. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 3

Methods Enrollment and demographic data are used to describe the population enrolled in the program. Enrollment metrics are based on individual enrollment history records for each LIHP enrollee. Findings presented in this dashboard report are based on data submitted to UCLA as of December 31, 2013. There is a one quarter delay in reporting utilization metrics to allow sufficient time for claims processing. Future dashboard reports will include updated data on enrollment, demographics, and utilization, and will be revised to reflect retroactive changes to enrollment and utilization. All analyses contained in this report are dependent on the quality, completeness, and timeliness of data provided by LIHPs. They represent analysis conducted by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research on the data provided by LIHPs for the purposes of the LIHP evaluation. Detailed methods are available upon request. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 4

Program Facts: CMSP Implementation Date: January 1, 2012 Current Income Limit: 100% FPL New LIHP Did not participate in the Health Care Coverage Initiative, the previous waiver demonstration A Consortium of Primarily Rural Counties in California Hybrid Payor/Provider County Network includes both public and private contract providers Total Population: 3,318,000 Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey Visit: DHCS Contract Documentation Page 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 5

ENROLLMENT AND DEMOGRAPHICS

Total Unduplicated Monthly Enrollment, Program-to-Date 46,503 47,490 49,101 50,713 52,188 53,656 55,129 56,239 56,050 56,889 56,942 56,583 58,364 58,358 59,351 60,320 61,545 62,978 63,763 64,632 65,651 66,472 65,087 65,957 This chart displays the number of individuals enrolled during each month of the program. This can also be interpreted as the number of member months. Total Member Months to Date: 1,389,961 Jan'12 Feb'12 Mar'12 Apr'12 May'12 Jun'12 Jul'12 Aug'12 Sep'12 Oct'12 Nov'12 Dec'12 Jan'13 Feb'13 Mar'13 Apr'13 May'13 Jun'13 Jul'13 Aug'13 Sep'13 Oct'13 Nov'13 Dec'13 The monthly number of enrollees is dependent on both enrollment and disenrollment. Program strategies for outreach, enrollment, and retention/redetermination, as well as the demand for care within the eligible population and other factors may influence enrollment trends. Note: Eligibility processing time is continuous, therefore enrollment data for latter months may be retroactively adjusted in the following quarter s dashboards as new data becomes available. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 7

Trend of Monthly Enrollment and Disenrollment 70,000 60,000 50,000 Existing Enrollees Newly Enrolled Disenrolled Existing Enrollees are individuals enrolled in their local LIHP during the month prior to the specified month. New Enrollees are individuals newly enrolled in LIHP during the specified month. 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Feb'12 Mar'12 Apr'12 May'12 Jun'12 Jul'12 Aug'12 Sep'12 Oct'12 Nov'12 Dec'12 Jan'13 Feb'13 Mar'13 Apr'13 May'13 Jun'13 Jul'13 Aug'13 Sep'13 Oct'13 Nov'13 Dec'13 Disenrolled are individuals that are no longer enrolled in the program during the month prior to the specified month. The sum of Existing Enrollees and New Enrollees is the total unduplicated monthly enrollment. Note: Eligibility processing time is continuous, therefore enrollment data for latter months may be retroactively adjusted in the following quarter s dashboards as new data becomes available. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 8

Demographic Characteristics of Cumulative Unduplicated Enrollees Age and Gender 17.0% 25.0% 55 + 20% 12.4% 14.7% 50-54 13% 10.9% 11.2% 45-49 11% 9.3% 7.5% 40-44 9% 9.0% 6.0% 35-39 8% 12.8% 8.7% 30-34 11% 15.8% 13.0% 25-29 15% 12.9% 13.8% <=24 13% Male: (57.9%) Female: (42.1%) Total Cumulative Unduplicated Enrollees: 143,264 Overall Age Distribution 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 9

Demographic Characteristics of Cumulative Unduplicated Enrollees Race/Ethnicity 66.5% 18.9% 6.7% 3.6% 4.3% White African American Latino Asian/PI Other Total Cumulative Unduplicated Enrollees: 143,264 Note: Asian includes Native Hawaiian. Other includes American Indian or Alaska Native. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 10

Demographic Characteristics of Cumulative Unduplicated Enrollees Preferred Language 93.0% 6.0% 0.6% 0.4% English Spanish Asian/PI Languages Other Total Cumulative Unduplicated Enrollees: 143,264 Note: Classification of Languages follows the US Census guidelines. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 11

Chronic Conditions Prevalence of Diabetes, Asthma/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)/ Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Dyslipidemia, or Hypertension among Enrollees 20.1% 14.1% 8.9% 10.1% 3.4% Diabetes Asthma/COPD CAD/CHF Dyslipidemia Hypertension Total Cumulative Unduplicated Enrollees: 143,264 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 12

UTILIZATION OF HEALTH SERVICES

Utilization Methods and Time Frame of Analyses UCLA utilization analyses are based on claims or encounter data provided to UCLA. Utilization metrics describe the volume of health care services paid for by LIHP and the rate of health care utilization among active and all enrollees. An active user is defined as an enrollee with at least one claim/encounter record in a given quarter. To control for variation in claims data availability and completeness, the number of active users is used as the denominator for rate calculations. Rates represent the frequency of use among users, excluding enrollees without health care service use. Emergency room and inpatient records that occur on the same or consecutive days are counted as one visit. Outpatient evaluation and management (E&M) visits include claims with the following CPT codes: 99201-99205, 99211-99215, 99241-99245, 99271-99275, 99381-99387, 99391-99397. Any outpatient E&M claims that occurred on the same day, with the same provider, are counted as one service/visit. There is a one-quarter delay in reporting utilization metrics to allow sufficient time for claims processing. The timeline below illustrates the time frame for the utilization analyses. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 14

Proportion of Enrollees Who Were Active Users of Health Services, by Service Type January 1, 2012 - September 30, 2013 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Any Service Emergency Room (ER) Inpatient (IP) Evaluation and Management (E&M) 64.2% 42.2% 65.9% 43.8% 16.3% 16.4% 16.5% 64.8% 64.8% 65.3% 66.0% During each time period, a proportion of the enrollees who are beneficiaries of the program will use health services. This proportion, called active users, varies by time period, service type, and other factors. Non-user enrollees are enrolled, but did not access care paid for by LIHP. The proportion of enrollees who are active users is an important indicator of the demand for care and access to care. However, it may not fully represent utilization by enrollees. There may be unknown gaps in data completeness. Total Enrolled Quarter 1: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 2: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 3: 58,118 Quarter 4: 62,125 Quarter 5: 66,663 Quarter 6: 67,510 Quarter 7: 69,726 Quarter 8: 72,041 Quarter 9: 75,004 Note: There is a one quarter delay in reporting utilization metrics to allow sufficient time for claims processing. Additionally, claims data for latter quarters may be retroactively adjusted in the following quarter s dashboards as new data becomes available. Out-of-network ER benefits are a new benefit covered under LIHP and are included in ER utilization, which may result in ER use increases across quarters. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 15 64.8% 42.5% 42.4% 43.3% 44.1% 43.2% 15.4% 15.9% 16.3% 15.6% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 3.9% 4.1% 4.1% 4.0% Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Quarter 5 Quarter 6 Quarter 7 Quarter 8 Quarter 9

Volume of Utilization Emergency Room Visits, Inpatient Admissions and Evaluation & Management Visits January 1, 2012 - September 30, 2013 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 Emergency Room (ER) Inpatient (IP) Evaluation and Management (E&M) 81,110 82,511 75,884 70,289 70,280 67,885 61,275 The total volumes of emergency room (ER), inpatient (IP) admissions, and outpatient evaluation and management (EM) visits represent the total number of services paid for by LIHP. These measures are valuable as assessments of total activity and proxy for expenditures. Total volumes of services and admissions are influenced by the number of enrollees and their characteristics and health seeking behaviors. As enrollment increases, total volumes of utilization are expected to grow. 30000 20000 10000 0 14,020 15,201 16,467 15,412 16,303 17,519 17,456 3,612 3,910 4,374 4,184 4,333 4,692 4,937 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Quarter 5 Quarter 6 Quarter 7 Quarter 8 Quarter 9 Total Enrolled Quarter 1: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 2: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 3: 58,118 Quarter 4: 62,125 Quarter 5: 66,663 Quarter 6: 67,510 Quarter 7: 69,726 Quarter 8: 72,041 Quarter 9: 75,004 Note: There is a one quarter delay in reporting utilization metrics to allow sufficient time for claims processing. Additionally, claims data for latter quarters may be retroactively adjusted in the following quarter s dashboards as new data becomes available. Out-of-network ER benefits are a new benefit covered under LIHP and are included in ER utilization, which may result in ER use increases across quarters. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 16

Rate of Utilization per 1,000 Enrollees Inpatient Admissions, Emergency Room and Evaluation & Management Visits January 1, 2012 - September 30, 2013 1400 1200 1000 800 Emergency Room (ER) Inpatient (IP) Evaluation and Management (E&M) 1,285 1,301 1,293 1,316 1,260 1,276 1,237 The rates of emergency room (ER), inpatient (IP), and outpatient evaluation and management (EM) utilization per 1,000 enrollees per quarter represent standardized measures of utilization. Rates are adjusted for the level of enrollment in each quarter. Initial increases in rates of utilization may be due to pent-up demand. 600 400 200 0 294 291 295 271 278 284 270 76 75 78 74 74 76 76 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Quarter 5 Quarter 6 Quarter 7 Quarter 8 Quarter 9 Total Member Months Quarter 1: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 2: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 3: 143,094 Quarter 4: 156,557 Quarter 5: 167,418 Quarter 6: 170,414 Quarter 7: 176,073 Quarter 8: 184,843 Quarter 9: 194,046 Note: There is a one quarter delay in reporting utilization metrics to allow sufficient time for claims processing. Additionally, claims data for latter quarters may be retroactively adjusted in the following quarter s dashboards as new data becomes available. Out-of-network ER benefits are a new benefit covered under LIHP and are included in ER utilization, which may result in ER use increases across quarters. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 17

Rate of Utilization per 1,000 Active Enrollees Inpatient Admissions, Emergency Room and Evaluation & Management Visits January 1, 2012 - September 30, 2013 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Emergency Room (ER) Inpatient (IP) Evaluation and Management (E&M) 1,509 1,476 1,498 1,516 1,461 1,425 1,398 The rates of emergency room (ER), inpatient (IP) and outpatient evaluation and management (EM) utilization per 1,000 active enrollees per quarter represent standardized measures of utilization. Rates are adjusted for the level of enrollment in each quarter amongst active users. Initial increases in rates of utilization may be due to pent-up demand. 600 400 200 0 345 330 334 307 314 323 321 89 85 89 83 83 87 91 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Quarter 5 Quarter 6 Quarter 7 Quarter 8 Quarter 9 Active User Member Months Quarter 1: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 2: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 3: 121,826 Quarter 4: 138,016 Quarter 5: 147,948 Quarter 6: 150,807 Quarter 7: 155,778 Quarter 8: 162,476 Quarter 9: 163,329 Note: There is a one quarter delay in reporting utilization metrics to allow sufficient time for claims processing. Additionally, claims data for latter quarters may be retroactively adjusted in the following quarter s dashboards as new data becomes available. Out-of-network ER benefits are a new benefit covered under LIHP and are included in ER utilization, which may result in ER use increases across quarters. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 18

Average Length of Inpatient Stay January 1, 2012 - September 30, 2013 10 9 8 The average number of inpatient (IP) days per admission, or average length of stay is the total number of IP days divided by the total number of IP visits, per quarter. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Quarter 5 Quarter 6 Quarter 7 Quarter 8 Quarter 9 Total Number of IP Days Quarter 1: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 2: Not Yet Implemented Quarter 3: 6,243 Quarter 4: 6,850 Quarter 5: 7,887 Quarter 6: 7,426 Quarter 7: 8,376 Quarter 8: 8,465 Quarter 9: 9,024 Note: There is a one quarter delay in reporting utilization metrics to allow sufficient time for claims processing. Additionally, claims data for latter quarters may be retroactively adjusted in the following quarter s dashboards as new data becomes available. 1/1/2012-12/31/2013 LIHP Performance Dashboard - CMSP 19

Data Source: The data sources for the LIHP Performance Dashboard are from quarterly enrollment, encounter and claims data. These data are provided to UCLA by the participating LIHPs as part of the Low Income Health Program Evaluation. Data Analysts: Xiao Chen, PhD Erin Salce, MPH Natasha Purington, MS Candidate UCLA Center for Health Policy Research Completed with the support of the California Medicaid Research Institute, University of California Funded by Blue Shield of California Foundation and the California Department of Health Care Services Low Income Health Program Performance Dashboards. Analysis by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, April 30, 2014. FOR MORE INFORMATION www.coverageinitiative.ucla.edu UCLA Center for Health Policy Research 10960 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1550 Los Angeles, CA, 90024 www.healthpolicy.ucla.edu