UACES Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Statement

Similar documents
New York University UNIVERSITY POLICIES

Subrecipient monitoring responsibilities are shared among the following:

University of Missouri System Accounting Policies and Procedures

Subrecipient Assessment and Monitoring - It Takes a Village!

NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

The University Maryland Baltimore County

Subrecipient Monitoring Guide

POLICY STATEMENT: Policy #: 1.1. Sub-recipient award management. Issue/Effective Date: December 26, Revision/Effective Date:

Subrecipient Monitoring & Risk Assessment Guidelines

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING GUIDE

Subrecipient Monitoring on Sponsored Projects Policy No. GSU: University Research Services and Administration

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY POLICY ON SPONSORED PROJECT SUBAWARDS

PART 6 - INTERNAL CONTROL

Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR)

STANDARD ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

Responsibilities and Requirements for Subrecipient Financial Monitoring

Uniform Guidance Overview

SPA and Outgoing Subawards. Molly Epstein, Karin Bourassa, Kathy McConnell, Erin Fitzgerald 12/8/2017

Account Monitoring and Reconciliation Can Reduce Cost Transfers

Procedures for the Administration of Subcontracts

SINGLE AUDIT UPDATE. Presented By Joel Knopp, CPA

Indirect costs, on the other hand, are expenses that cannot be specifically identified with a particular project or activity.

SUB-RECIPIENT DUE DILIGENCE AND MONITORING POLICY

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Housing Counseling

No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during 2016.

March 23, /1/2018 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY. Subcontracting. Overview. Recording date of this workshop is

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY STATEMENT

Uniform Guidance: Key Points of the UNC Implementation - Getting to the Real Impacts of 2 CFR Part 200

2 CFR 215 (A-110) or 2 CFR 230 (A-122) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.

A8.900 ACCOUNTING FOR RESEARCH & TRAINING CONTRACTS & GRANTS. A8.930 Services with the Research Corporation of the University of Hawai i

OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS SUBAWARD PROCESS MANUAL

Program Income on Sponsored Projects Policy No. GSU: University Research Services and Administration

PROGRAM INCOME PROCEDURES

Guidelines & Procedures for Monitoring Subrecipients

Board of Directors Arkansas Health Insurance Marketplace Little Rock, Arkansas

HIV/AIDS Bureau, Division of Service Systems Monitoring Standards for Ryan White Part A and B Grantees: Part A Fiscal Monitoring Standards

Award Close Out Procedures

Subgrantee Monitoring and Risk Assessment Principles. Brian Sass, OVC

MONITORING THE COUNCIL S INVESTMENTS

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY. Page 1 of 9. Finance and Administration. Fiscal Roles and Responsibilities ADAMS STATE COLLEGE. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 15, 2006

Florida MIECHV Initiative Provider Fiscal Policy Manual

Exhibit B ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE DJ-R: FEDERAL PROCUREMENT MANUAL

CHAPTER 11: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Single Audit Fundamentals Part 3: Understanding and Testing Compliance Requirements and Related Internal Control over Compliance

530: Accounts Payable Policy

Subcontract Request Form

HIV/AIDS Bureau, Division of Metropolitan HIV/AIDS Programs National Monitoring Standards for Ryan White Part A Grantees: Fiscal Part A

Compliance Auditing Considerations in Audits of Governmental Entities and Recipients of Governmental Financial Assistance

DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

Monitoring of WIOA Programs Interim Policy & Procedures

Post Award Overview OSP or IAC reviews terms and conditions and negotiates any terms which AU cannot accept

Welcome Packet for New Johns Hopkins University Subrecipients Receiving Cost-Reimbursable Federal Subawards

Boston College: OFFICE FOR SPONSORED PROGRAMS Definitions and Glossary of Terms

Management Representation Letter (PHA) PROJECT S LETTERHEAD

STANDARD STATEMENT OF WORK FOR FINANCIAL AUDITS OF NON-U.S. ORGANIZATIONS CONTRACTED BY THE RECIPIENT

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Housing Counseling

The Uniform Guidance: Changes and Strategies for Implementation

Introduction to IDEA Part B Fiscal Accountability Plan

General Accounting Policies & Procedures

SuperCircular and Budget and Accounting PIN

Federal Property Management Standards

ALLOWABLE COSTS ON GRANTS February 2010

2) Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund and All Major Special Revenue Funds

Webinar 1 - Financial Management

Virginia Department of Transportation Indirect Cost Rate Submission and Review Process Effective January 1, 2019

Amy Roberts, Appalachian State University

Contracts & Grants ESTABLISHING THE CONTRACT OR GRANT SYSTEM ACCESS & USER GROUP SECURITY ONLINE FINANCIAL REPORTS

Schedule of Federal Audit Findings and Questioned Costs

Research & Sponsored Programs Accounting Policy Recharge Centers and Annual Approval of Rates POLICY STATEMENT

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS ROUND TABLE. June 7, 2016 Health Sciences Center June 8, 2016 Brooks Hall

CROSSWALK OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

Washington State Auditor s Office. Financial Statements and Federal Single Audit Report. Skagit County

Procedures for the Administration of Sponsored Projects Subcontracts

Uniform Guidance Super Circular 2 CFR Part 200

Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards Key Changes and Lessons

University of Central Florida

GRANT AWARD NOTIFICATION

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 SECTION II FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS

March 4, 2015 To the Board Members of the Housing Finance Authority of Pinellas County and Kathryn Driver, Executive Director We are pleased to

Uniform Guidance vs. OMB Circulars

CONTRACT COST STATEMENT

Policy on Cost Allocation, Cost Recovery, and Cost Sharing

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR ELDERLY PERSONS AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES JOB ACCESS REVERSE COMMUTE

Weston School District E2511 HWY S Cazenovia, WI July 1, 2017

CHILD CARE INFORMATION SERVICES (CCIS) Audit Guidelines. Fiscal Year

City of Spokane Spokane County

The American University in Cairo Financial Policies and Procedures

Chicago Department of Family Services Head Start

21 st Century Community Learning Centers Program. Monitoring Document Fiduciary Responsibilities

FHA-Lender ENGAGEMENT LETTER

SPA & SPAC UPDATE MEETING SECOND QUARTER 2013

University of Missouri System Accounting Policies and Procedures

PART 3 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICY 7A-5 COST TRANSFER POLICY. This policy applies only to cost transfers between or to sponsored projects.

Discussion of Single Audit in North Carolina

Uniform Grant Guidance Policies & Procedures

Department of Education. Federal Compliance Audit Year Ended June 30, 2008

UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY / KANSAS CITY, KANSAS

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR RECIPIENT CONTRACTED AUDIT OF USAID RESOURCES MANAGED BY THE WEST AFRICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WAHO)

OMB. Uniform Guidance

Transcription:

UACES Subrecipient Monitoring Policy Statement UACES monitors the financial and programmatic performance of Subrecipients, and evaluates their capacity to effectively manage a Subaward. The university s objective is to monitor that sponsor funds are appropriately spent, that performance goals are met, and that Subrecipients comply with all applicable law, regulations, and prime award terms. UACES may impose specific controls, as needed, for certain Subrecipients based on relevant risk factors. The terms of the Subrecipient s relationship with the university are documented in a written Subaward agreement between the university and the Subrecipient organization. Reason for Policy/Purpose: UACES becomes responsible for the financial and programmatic monitoring of the sponsor s funds upon acceptance of a sponsored agreement. Subawards become necessary when UACES wishes to assign responsibility for conducting a portion of the project work to another entity (Subrecipient). UACES remains ultimately responsible to the sponsor for the programmatic and financial management of all funding. To ensure proper stewardship of sponsored projects adherence to applicable federal, state and local regulations is required. UACES undertakes specific monitoring activities as it relates to Subrecipients, including but not limited to Subrecipient pre-qualification(risk assessments), reporting, regular contact, and other means as necessary to provide reasonable assurance that Subrecipients administer and perform Subawards in compliance with applicable law, regulations, and the provisions of the sponsored agreement. This policy applies to all Subawards issued under all sponsored projects awarded to the UACES regardless of the primary source of funding. This policy does not apply to consultant agreements or the procurement of goods or services from Contractors. Policy/Procedures This policy includes the following elements: 1. Determination Subrecipient versus Contractor With each agreement UACES makes for the disbursement of federal and non-federal funds there is a determination as to whether the entity receiving the funds is in the role of a Subrecipient or a Contractor. Subrecipients follow different rules and regulations than Contractors. This policy only applies to Subrecipients. 2. Pre-Qualification of Subrecipients (Risk Assessment) 3. Subrecipient Monitoring (Procedures): During the period of the Subaward, the university performs the following activities with regard to Subrecipients:

SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UACES PROCEDURES Background University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service (UACES) is responsible for ensuring that sponsored funds, including those provided by UACES to other entities, are spent in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. UACES is required to monitor its subrecipients as if it were the primary sponsor. This monitoring requirement places UACES in much the same position as if it were a federal agency dealing with its own primary recipient. The Uniform Guidance, specifically 200.305, 200.330, 200.331, 200.332 and 200.338, sets forth the responsibilities and obligations of institutions such as UACES, for determining eligibility of subrecipients, issuance of subawards, monitoring subrecipients and applying remedies for noncompliance, when federal funds are transferred to subrecipients. As such, whenever UACES issues a subaward to a subrecipient, the University must first assess the subrecipient s eligibility to receive federal funds and follow up by monitoring the subrecipient to ensure its compliance with federal laws and regulations. Although Principal Investigators have primary responsibility for monitoring the technical progress and claimed costs of subrecipients 1, it is understood that some responsibilities are frequently delegated by Principal Investigators to departmental staff or administrators. The following guidance is provided to assist Principal Investigators and those to whom they have delegated some of these responsibilities. Definitions Pass-Through Entity: defined as a non-federal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a federal program. The pass-through entity assumes responsibility for negotiation, issuance, oversight, and management of a subaward. The pass-through entity assumes many of the responsibilities typically assigned to a prime sponsor in issuance and oversight of an award to a grantee or contractor, including verification of the financial viability, adequacy of compliance controls and audit status of its subrecipients as well as oversight and verification of the subrecipient s fulfillment of its portion of the programmatic effort. UACES serves as the pass-through entity for subawards issued under its sponsored projects. Subrecipient: means a non-federal entity that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity (e.g., UACES) to carry out part of a federal program; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such program. Characteristics which support the classification of the non-federal entity as a subrecipient include when the non-federal entity: (1) Determines who is eligible to receive what federal assistance; (2) Has its performance measured in relation to whether objectives of a federal program were met; (3) Has responsibility for programmatic decision making; (4) Is responsible for adherence to applicable federal program requirements specified in 1 Certification and authorization of payment may not be delegated. Principal Investigator s must certify project monitoring activities with a signature.

the federal award; and (5) In accordance with its agreement, uses the federal funds to carry out a program for a public purpose specified in authorizing statute, as opposed to providing goods or services for the benefit of the pass-through entity. Subaward: is defined, for the purpose of this guidance, as the legal agreement between UACES and a subrecipient to carry out part of a federal assistance award received by UACES. It does not include a legal agreement to provide payments to a contractor for goods or services or payments to an individual that is a beneficiary of a federal program. Subrecipient Monitoring Guidelines The following are Specific Responsibilities for principal investigator monitoring of subrecipients: 1. Monitor the activities of the subrecipient sufficiently to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Principal Investigator s monitoring of subrecipients, in this regard, must include: (1) Reviewing financial and programmatic reports on an on-going basis; (2) Following-up and ensuring that subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the subaward which are detected through on-site reviews, monitoring of progress and financial reports and other means. 2. Certify all subrecipient s invoices, evidencing performance goals were met and authorizing payment. Sub recipients send their invoices to the Principal Investigator (PI). The PI is responsible for reviewing each invoice to verify the validity of expenses related to his/her project, ensure sponsor terms and conditions specified in the award are being met, and the guidance in the Invoice Monitoring Checklist has been followed. The PI will review the invoice in a timely manner of receipt. If during the review of an invoice, the PI determines there is a concern, the PI will contact the sub recipient for clarification or additional documentation. Should the PI determine there are unallowable charges that are not reimbursable, he/she will request a revised invoice from the sub recipient. Once the PI approves an invoice for reimbursement, he/she will sign and date the invoice and forward it to the Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP). OSP will review the invoice for accuracy in accordance with the Invoice Monitoring Checklist and send the approved invoice to Financial Services for payment. 3. Respond in a manner to allow for timely payments for all proper invoices from subrecipients. The Subrecipient Monitoring UACES Procedures, Subrecipient Monitoring Certification Form and Invoice Monitoring Checklist should be shared with the Principal Investigator during the Bridge Conference. The signed Certification Form should be filed with OSP at that time.

Invoice Monitoring Checklist How to use: This guide is a list of questions to consider when monitoring invoices for completeness and compliance with UACES s procedures. Guide for review of subaward invoices. Responsibilities for specific subrecipient tasks PI OSP may differ as indicated by the checked boxes under Principle Investigator (PI) and Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP). 1. Are the correct Subaward No., PO No., and Account Number provided? 2. Are the expenses allowable per the subaward and the prime award? Remember the prime award requirements and budget restrictions flow down to the sub-recipient. 3. Are the invoiced expenses included in the subaward budget? The subrecipient should only invoice for approved expenses per the subaward or ask for approval to modify budget? 4. Are invoiced expenses consistent with the programmatic plan, work completed to date and progress reports? The expenses invoiced should agree with the work incurred. 5. Obtain Principal Investigator s (PI) signature on the sub recipient invoice. By signing the PI certifies as follows: Approval of Invoice payment, attest the charges appear reasonable, and progress to date for this project is satisfactory and in keeping with the statement of work. 6. Were all the expenses incurred within the subaward start and end dates? Ensure that the dates on the invoice are within the subaward dates. 7. Are the cumulative expenses within the overall approved budget amount? Ensure that subrecipients are not invoicing for amounts over the approved total budget. 8. Are the invoice expenses per budget category in agreement with the budgeted amount per line item category or within an allowable deviation? 9. Does Invoice include cost share/match as required in the subaward? 10. Are the fringe rates and amounts accurate for the current invoice? 11. Does the invoice total correctly? If invoice is final, subrecipient must indicate FINAL on the invoice. 12. Are the Indirect Costs (IDC) calculated correctly with the correct and agreed upon rate for the subrecipient? Ensure the calculated IDC agrees with the methodology in the budget. 13. Does the invoice have an institutional official signature and contain the following statement: I certify that all expenditures reported (or payment requested) are for appropriate purposes and in accordance with the provisions of the application and award documents. (Requirement of OMB Uniform Guidance). NOTE: Most invoices do not include a large amount of detail. Ask the sub recipient for back-up documentation on specific budget line items if something does not appear correct. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE INVOICES, DO NOT APPROVE UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE APPROPRIATELY RESOLVED.

SUBRECIPIENT CERTIFICATION FORM University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service (UACES) is responsible for ensuring that sponsor funds, including those provided by UACES to other entities, are spent in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. UACES is required to monitor its subrecipients as if it were the sponsor. This monitoring requirement places UACES in much the same position as if it were a federal agency dealing with its own primary recipient. Therefore, the following responsibilities are required to be carried out by the principal investigator for their grant funded project. The following are Specific Responsibilities for principal investigator monitoring of subrecipients: 1. I will monitor the activities of the subrecipient sufficiently to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. I agree to review financial, programmatic and progress reports on an on-going basis; follow-up and ensuring that subrecipients take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the subaward which are detected through on-site reviews or other means. 2. I agree to certify all subrecipient s invoices, review the evidence that performance goals are met and authorize payment, prior to submission to OSP for review and submission to Accounting for payment. 3. I will respond throughout the subrecipient monitoring process in a manner to allow for timely payments for all proper invoices received from subrecipients. In signing below, I have reviewed and understand the subrecipient monitoring guidelines established by UACES and agree to 1) monitor both financial and programmatic activities of all project sub-awards and 2) approve payment on each invoice and attest that charges appear reasonable and progress to date on the below referenced project is satisfactory and in keeping with the statement of work. Grant Project Number: Principal Investigator Date Sponsored Program s Official Date