Tomah Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2015

Similar documents
School District of Somerset Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

Sheboygan Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

School District of West De Pere Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

Muskego Norway Schools Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

Beaver Dam Unified School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

Marathon School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Freedom Area School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Gillett School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

76% The comprehensive solution put forward by the Community Steering Committee addresses a wide variety of needs at the high school:

School District of Slinger Community Survey Report

Oakfield School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

Burlington Area School District Community Survey Results. Winter 2016

Barneveld School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2017

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

West Bend School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Third Draft Budget March 5, 2019

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

Third Draft Budget March 6, 2018

DeKalb County School District FY Proposed Budget SUPERINTENDENT S PROPOSED BUDGET

Cherry Creek School District Profile of Student-Based Budgeting for Schools FY

Board of Education Meeting

BUDGET UPDATE PART II. Board of Education Meeting March 26, 2018

Budget. Draft #1

Shenandoah County Public Schools Budget April 23, 2015

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Cherry Creek School District Profile of Student-Based Budgeting for Schools FY

EVESHAM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT

Hampton City Schools Job Classification Listing SY 16/17

Total Community Parent Student Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %

School District of Horicon Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

Introduction. Board Members

Board of Education. Daniel A. Nerad, Superintendent. Date: March 11, Citizen s Budget

Budget Overview Daniel G. Lowengard, Interim Superintendent of Schools Everton Sewell, Chief Financial Officer March 19,

Budget General Information (characteristics of district) Supplemental Information for Tables in Summary of Expenditures

Fiscal Year 2017 Budget

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM

Budget Development. Today s Kindergartners Tomorrow s Leaders

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GEORGIA LOCAL UNITS OF ADMINISTRATION. 10/30/91 II Financial Reporting. 1 March 2017 II-7 QBE Program Reporting/Budgeting

Budget Update Budget Amendments Fiscal 2019

Salary Scales

ADMINISTRATION S RECOMMENDED FY14 OPERATING BUDGET. Presented to the Wellesley School Committee December 18, 2012

Superintendent s Proposed BUDGET Fiscal Year Public Hearing April 8, 2015

Budget. Draft #1

ADOPTED BUDGET

Fall 2015 Staff Update

Budget Development for Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011

Albuquerque Public Schools Fiscal Year 2019 Budget APS & APS Charter Schools

William Floyd School District Budget Presentation #4

FY16 BUDGET BASICS. Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office Community Presentation

PRESENTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #16 PROSPECT / BEACON FALLS MAY 5, 2008

Wrentham Public Schools

Mart ISD Salary, Wage, & Retention Schedules

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Agenda Item

Wheatland-Chili Central Schools Budget Development

Highland School District Licensed Salary Schedule

Proposed Budget (Revised Draft as of) April 12, Balancing Economic Realities with Maintaining Quality and Excellence

Regional School Unit Budget Presentation

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018

BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUDGET SOLUTIONS

DAVIS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION PROGRAMS PARCEL TAX (MEASURE H)

St. Tammany Parish School Board. BUDGET General Fund. Fiscal Year July 1, 2018 June 30, 2019

Wheatland-Chili Central Schools Budget Development

Frederick County Public Schools. Salary Scales Amherst Street Winchester, Virginia

Registration for Junior Year CLASS OF 2019

PRELIMINARY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2018

McCracken County Public Schools Salary Schedule

EVESHAM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT Preliminary Budget Presentation

Manassas City Public Schools Administrative Salary Schedule FY

California Department of Education Form J-90 CDS Code For the Certificated Bargaining Unit

Cherry Creek School District Profile of Student-Based Budgeting for Schools FY

East Baton Rouge Parish School System Salary Schedules

April 8, Volusia County School Board DeLand Administrative Complex

Highland School District Salary Schedules

Review of Financial Context for Budget Development. Tough Options: Summary and Rationale of Proposed. Marie Wiles, Superintendent of Schools

Burbank Unified School District Issues Survey

APPENDIX Budget. Florida Charter Foundation / Franklin Academy Charter Application for Campus C

Berkeley Heights Public Schools. Budget Presenta-on for the School Year

Wheatland-Chili Central Schools Budget Development. Board of Education Meeting February 13, 2017

Caddo Parish School Board

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Monarch Montessori of Denver Charter 161 Job Prog Proj Code Obj

Uxbridge School Department School Administration Recommended Budget

PROFILE INFORMATION. Humboldt USD #

Superintendent s Preliminary Budget

Highland School District Licensed Salary Schedule

Wappingers Central School District Financial & Budget Terms

The Florida International University Budget Town Hall Discussion. March 9, 2009

Proposed Budget

Orange Unified School District (C) Copyright March 2018 All Rights Reserved

Community Budget Workshop Broad Street School April 4, Preliminary School Budget

Maine School Administrative District No. 1 Castle Hill * Chapman * Mapleton * Presque Isle * Westfield BUDGET PROPOSAL OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Local District South Title I Meeting

Lower Merion School District

FY 19 SCHOOL DEPARTMENT OPERATING BUDGET Annual Town Meeting: March 10, 2018

School District of Philadelphia Budget 101: Understanding the District s Budget. April 17, 2018

Budget General Information (characteristics of district) Supplemental Information for Tables in Summary of Expenditures

FY18 Budget Development Update

South Orange-Maplewood School District. January 30, 2017

LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET

Transcription:

Tomah Area School District Community Survey Results Spring 2015

Survey Summary The community survey was conducted in April and early May of 2015 All residents within the District were mailed a paper survey. Each survey included a unique survey access code for those who preferred to take the survey online. Total responses = 1,408/511 paper (15% response rate) Margin of error for the full sample +/- 2.7%

Section I: Respondent Information

What is your age? 30% 26% 25% 21% 20% 16% 16% 19% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2% 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-64 65+

Is your primary residence in the Tomah Area School District (TASD)? 8% Yes No 92%

Are you an employee of the Tomah Area School District? 25% 75% Yes No

Do you have child(ren) attending the District? 45% 55% Yes No

If you have school-aged children, what school(s) do they attend? Tomah High School Tomah Middle School LaGrange Elementary Miller Elementary Private/Parochial School Lemonweir Elementary Warrens Elementary Wyeville Elementary Other Camp Douglas Elementary Offsite 4K site Oakdale Elementary TimberPUPS Center (4K) Public school outside of District Virtual/online school Homeschooled Robert Kupper Learning Center 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0.29% 8% 8% 12% 17% 30% 44% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

In which city or township do you reside? City of Tomah Town of Tomah Town of La Grange Town of Lincoln Other Town of Byron Town of Greenfield Town of Adrian Town of Oakdale Village of Warrens Town of Grant Village of Camp Douglas Town of Orange Town of Clifton Town of Cutler Town of Bear Bluff Town of Knapp Village of Oakdale Town of Wilton Village of Wyeville Town of Scott Town of Ridgeville Town of Kingston 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0.97% 0.97% 0.9% 0.82% 0.67% 0.6% 0.37% 0.15% 0.15% 11% 10% 41%

Please mark ALL other relationships you have with the Tomah Area School District: 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 41% 32% 26% 16% 11%

How often have you attended a District-sponsored event (athletics, performances etc.) in the past year? 40% 38% 35% 30% 26% 25% 21% 20% 15% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0 1-5 6-10 More than 10

Section II: Communication

How would you like to receive school/district information? (Does not include staff members) Email 20% 76% School and District websites 28% 55% From my child(ren) 6% 47% District mailings 44% 44% Family Access (Infinity) 3% 43% School newsletters 21% 43% Conversations with staff 11% 39% Text Messaging 5% 32% Facebook 15% 31% Tomah Journal 29% 62% Meetings at school 5% 21% Automated phone 4% 16% Parent organizations 2% 12% Radio 10% 28% Cable/Local TV 9% 29% School board meetings 8% 11% Twitter 1% 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Non-Parents Parents

Section III: The Tomah Difference

How important are the following? Very important (3), Somewhat important (2), Not important (1) Item Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non- Parents, Non-Staff Focusing improvements in reading/literacy 2.79 2.82 2.80 Developing student employability skills 2.82 2.79 2.73 Focusing improvements in math 2.69 2.75 2.71 Recruiting, hiring, and retaining high-quality staff 2.91 2.82 2.71 Helping students develop a plan for life after high school 2.78 2.79 2.65 Focusing improvements in science 2.52 2.63 2.59 Connecting families, community and businesses to the educational experience 2.73 2.54 2.54 Programming for students with disabilities 2.70 2.63 2.52

How important are the following? Very important (3), Somewhat important (2), Not important (1) Item Programming for struggling students at-risk of not graduating Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non- Parents, Non-Staff 2.54 2.48 2.46 Creating more hands-on learning spaces/experiences 2.63 2.70 2.42 Improving school safety/security 2.36 2.5 2.40 Programming for gifted and talented students 2.22 2.36 2.19 Offering a variety of school activities (forensics, theater, FFA, etc.) 2.38 2.43 2.17 Scoring high on state and national tests 2.17 2.14 2.09 Maintaining competitive high school athletics 1.85 2.08 1.82 Programming for non-english speaking students (ELL) 2.17 1.79 1.78

Please respond to the following statements. Strongly agree (5), Agree (4), Disagree (2), Strongly disagree (1) Item Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non- Parents, Non-Staff I feel welcomed when I visit a school in TASD. 4.32 4.06 3.94 TASD builds strong community partnerships. 4.04 3.78 3.78 I am satisfied with TASD communication. 3.8 3.7 3.68 I believe TASD is heading in the right direction. 3.73 3.55 3.65

Overall, how satisfied are you with TASD? 80% 72% 70% 60% 50% 59% 51% 40% 30% 28% Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents, Non-Staff 20% 10% 0% 17% 17% 9% Very satisfied Satisfied 15% 8% 10% Not satisfied 6% 1% 3% 2% 2% Very unsatisfied No opinion

Section IV: Educational Initiatives

How important are the following? Very important (3), Somewhat important (2), Not important (1) Item Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non- Parents, Non-Staff Continue to offer the ACE (Architecture, Construction and Engineering) Academy which integrates academics with technical instruction in construction related fields. Continue to offer Project Lead the Way, a pre-engineering program that expands science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) offerings and explores careers in those fields. Establish a Medical Career Academy offering courses that expose students to a variety of careers in the healthcare field. 2.42 2.39 2.38 2.40 2.37 2.36 2.27 2.30 2.24 Continue offering training and certification for students interested in becoming nursing assistants (CNA program). Establish a one-to-one technology (laptop or tablet computer) initiative to improve student learning and provide students with 21st Century skills. 2.27 2.15 2.19 2.25 2.36 2.17

How important are the following? Very important (3), Somewhat important (2), Not important (1) Item Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non- Parents, Non-Staff Establish online courses as a way to expand course offerings. 2.04 2.11 2.10 Continue to offer multiple online language opportunities through the use of Rosetta Stone software. Establish a different elementary school calendar as an option/choice for parents. Students would attend school for 45 days and then have a 15 day break. This approach would have the same number of school days, but dispersed more evenly. This approach addresses the summer learning loss that often occurs over the extended summer break. Continue support of a Montessori Charter School which emphasizes learning through all five senses. Students work at their own individual pace and master concepts by participating in specifically designed Montessori activities of their own choice. 1.77 1.95 1.89 1.81 1.70 1.85 1.97 1.82 1.80

Section V: Financial Planning (Residents only)

Should the District continue to increase elementary class sizes to save money? 90% 90% 85% 79% 80% All Residents 67% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 25% 16% 11% 7% 8% 5% 3% 4% Yes No No opinion Staff Residents Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Non-Parent, Non- Staff Residents

Should the District increase middle/high school class sizes to save money? 90% 80% 70% 60% 74% 82% 81% 62% All Residents Staff Residents 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 29% 20% 15% 15% 9% 6% 3% 4% Yes No No opinion Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Non-Parent, Non- Staff Residents

Should the District decrease middle/high school course offering to save money? 80% 76% 76% 70% 68% All Residents 60% 57% 50% Staff Residents 40% 30% 20% 34% 25% 19% 20% Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Non-Parent, Non- Staff Residents 10% 7% 5% 4% 9% 0% Yes No No opinion

Should the District consider implementing a student fee schedule? 80% 76% 70% 60% 50% 61% 58% 55% All Residents Staff Residents 40% 30% 20% 10% 35% 35% 32% 20% 7% 4% 10% 7% Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Non-Parent, Non- Staff Residents 0% Yes No No opinion

Should the District reduce the number of bus routes not required by law and increase ride times to save money? 70% 60% 50% 65% 60% 60% 55% All Residents Staff Residents 40% 30% 28% 29% 29% 25% Parent Residents (Non-Staff) 20% 10% 16% 12% 11% 10% Non-Parent, Non- Staff Residents 0% Yes No No opinion

Section VI: Programs/Services (Residents only)

If funding cuts are needed, how should the District budget? Expand (3), Keep (2), Reduce (1) Item All Residents Staff Residents Parents Residents (Non-Staff) Non- Parent, Non-Staff Residents Reading Teachers 2.03 2.07 2.08 1.96 STEM 1.91 1.84 1.88 1.96 Physical Education (PE) 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.94 Special Education 2.00 2.07 2.03 1.94 Library Media (formerly called librarians) 1.84 1.82 1.8 1.89 Business Education 1.92 1.91 1.95 1.88 Summer PACK 1.76 1.68 1.69 1.88

If funding cuts are needed, how should the District budget? Expand (3), Keep (2), Reduce (1) Item All Residents Staff Residents Parents Residents (Non-Staff) Non- Parent, Non-Staff Residents Technology Staff 1.84 1.73 1.94 1.80 Gifted & Talented (TAG) 1.77 1.67 1.79 1.79 Teacher Aides 1.85 2.02 1.84 1.77 Music 1.81 1.85 1.83 1.76 Alternative Education 1.71 1.74 1.66 1.73 Buildings/Grounds/Custodial Staff 1.73 1.78 1.72 1.71 Family & Consumer Ed. 1.73 1.75 1.75 1.70

If funding cuts are needed, how should the District budget? Expand (3), Keep (2), Reduce (1) Item All Residents Staff Residents Parents Residents (Non-Staff) Non- Parent, Non-Staff Residents Agriculture 1.73 1.78 1.73 1.69 Art 1.76 1.84 1.80 1.67 Athletics & Co-Curriculars 1.59 1.52 1.70 1.52 Social Workers, Counselors & Psychologists 1.67 1.88 1.69 1.52 World Language 1.55 1.57 1.58 1.51 Administration 1.49 1.64 1.47 1.42

Section VII: Funding Support (Residents only)

What advice would you give the Board in regards to future budget planning? (Mark all that apply) Item All Residents Staff Residents Parents Residents (Non-Staff) Non- Parent, Non-Staff Residents Consider holding a referendum to maintain current programs/services 56% 81% 59% 41% I'm not sure/need more information 26% 12% 25% 33% Consider holding a referendum to attract/retain quality staff Do not hold a referendum, continue to cut programs and services to balance the budget Consider holding a referendum to increase student and staff technology access 41% 53% 46% 30% 15% 4% 11% 25% 30% 38% 32% 23%

Would you help the District maintain current programs and services by supporting a $1,000,000 ($1 million) referendum? At the end of three years, this would be a total tax increase of approximately $28 on each $100,000 of property valuation All Residents Definitely yes 40% 63% Yes Probably yes 23% Undecided 17% Probably no Definitely no 9% 11% 20% No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Would you help the District maintain current programs and services by supporting a $1,000,000 ($1 million) referendum? At the end of three years, this would be a total tax increase of approximately $28 on each $100,000 of property valuation Staff Residents Definitely yes 69% Probably yes 16% 85% Yes Undecided 10% Probably no Definitely no 3% 2% 5% No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Would you help the District maintain current programs and services by supporting a $1,000,000 ($1 million) referendum? At the end of three years, this would be a total tax increase of approximately $28 on each $100,000 of property valuation Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 41% Probably yes 26% 67% Yes Undecided 20% Probably no Definitely no 7% 6% 13% No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Would you help the District maintain current programs and services by supporting a $1,000,000 ($1 million) referendum? At the end of three years, this would be a total tax increase of approximately $28 on each $100,000 of property valuation Non-Parent, Non-Staff Residents Definitely yes 23% Probably yes 25% 48% Yes Undecided 17% Probably no Definitely no 14% 21% 35% No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Would you help the District update classroom technology and replace aging computers by supporting a $500,000 referendum? At the end of three years, this would be a total tax increase of approximately $16 on each $100,000 of property valuation All Residents Definitely yes 34% Probably yes 28% 62% Yes Undecided 18% Probably no Definitely no 10% 10% 20% No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Would you help the District update classroom technology and replace aging computers by supporting a $500,000 referendum? At the end of three years, this would be a total tax increase of approximately $16 on each $100,000 of property valuation Staff Residents Definitely yes 49% Probably yes 25% 74% Yes Undecided 17% Probably no 7% 9% No Definitely no 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Would you help the District update classroom technology and replace aging computers by supporting a $500,000 referendum? At the end of three years, this would be a total tax increase of approximately $16 on each $100,000 of property valuation Parent Residents (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 39% Probably yes 27% 66% Yes Undecided 20% Probably no Definitely no 7% 7% 14% No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Would you help the District update classroom technology and replace aging computers by supporting a $500,000 referendum? At the end of three years, this would be a total tax increase of approximately $16 on each $100,000 of property valuation Non-Parent, Non-Staff Residents Definitely yes 21% Probably yes 29% 50% Yes Undecided 18% Probably no 14% 32% No Definitely no 18% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Thank you!