Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

Similar documents
Simsbury. Challenges Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 356

Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 90

East Hartford. Challenges

Avon. Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100- Year Flood

Existing Strategies. Challenges

5.0 Town of Berlin Annex

9.10 HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.2 ALBURTIS BOROUGH. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for Alburtis Borough. A. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.24 WEISENBERG TOWNSHIP

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.8 FOUNTAIN HILL BOROUGH

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For Local Governments

ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

Village of Blue Mounds Annex

9.36 TOWN OF VAN BUREN

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Greater Greenburgh Planning Area Planning Process

1 Rare Hazard event is not likely to occur within 100 years. 2 Occasional Hazard event is likely to occur within 100 years

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Flood Insurance THE TOPIC OCTOBER 2012

Town of Montrose Annex

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Planning in Water s Way: Flood Resilient Economic Development Strategy for the I-86 Innovation Corridor

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

9.35 VILLAGE OF TULLY

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

SECTION V THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY BLUEPRINT

Flooding. Frequent occurrence. Can be severe and result in significant property damage. Major risk

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.11 BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

9.12 VILLAGE OF FABIUS

9.28 Village of New Berlin

CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT

Hazus: Estimated Damage and Economic Losses. South Carolina United States

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

Emergency Management. December 16, 2010

APPENDIX H TOWN OF FARMVILLE. Hazard Rankings. Status of Mitigation Actions. Building Permit Data. Future Land Use Map. Critical Facilities Map

Priority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago

Priority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago

Flood Risk Products. New Techniques for Identifying and Communicating Flood Risk

9.46 NAZARETH BOROUGH

SECTION 6 - RANGE OF ALTERNATIVE MITIGATION ACTIONS CONSIDERED

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Public Meeting 28 November Presented by: Deepa Srinivasan, Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Dr. Michael Scott, ESRGC, Salisbury University

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

A.) HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Table presents the numerical rating, weighted factor and description for each impact category

Hazard Mitigation Planning

9.15 MACUNGIE BOROUGH

Mapping Flood Risk in the Upper Fox River Basin:

Federal Flood Insurance Changes (National Flood Insurance Program NFIP)

Hurricane SANDY DR-4086-NJ

Repetitive Loss Area Revisit # 6 Walter Road Area Jefferson Parish

Community Incentives for Nature-Based Flood Solutions

Stormwater Utility Fund Delivery of Services

Appendix F: Ozark special Road District Addendum

Chemung HUC-8 Watershed Project. February 1, 2011

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND Department of Environmental Services

Name Title/ Department Address Telephone Fax

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Mitigation Action Plan Alamance County

CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Nicola Sapp County Budget Officer El Paso County, Colorado

The Citadel. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Disaster Resistant University Plan

CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

Priority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

9.24 TOWNSHIP OF WALPACK

9.27 Village of Greene

Dade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan

Osceola County Hazard Mitigation Plan. Part 3 - Mitigation Strategy

City of Sea Isle City Department of Construction and Zoning Physical Location: 4501 Park Road (rear entrance)

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF LISBON

On March 21, 2014, President Obama signed the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 into law.

Transcription:

Newington Newington is a fully suburban town in central Connecticut with a population of about 30,562. The Town encompasses 13.2 square miles and ranges in elevation from 40-350 feet above sea level. The northern section of Newington lies in the Park River Watershed, while the southern section is within the Mattabesset River watershed. The principal watercourses in Town include the Mill, Piper, Rockhole and Webster Brooks. Many state highways run through Newington, including the limited access Route 9, and the Berlin Turnpike (Routes 5/15). Major industries in Newington include printing and manufacturing of airplane parts, dies, gauges, tools and plumbing supplies, as well as significant retail development along the Berlin Turnpike. Newington also houses the Veterans Administration s Connecticut Health Primary Care Facility, the Connecticut Department of Transportation and the Connecticut International Skating Center. The town has recently experienced the development of three major residential complexes; Newington Ridge, Waverley Drive, and Woodland Estates. In addition, there are various elderly housing campuses around town; Cedar Village, Kelliher Park, Millbrook Village, and the newly developed New Meadow Village. Challenges The Town has not permitted any new structures in the 100 year flood zone since the adoption of the 2008 Plan and thus has not increased its vulnerability to flooding. Nonetheless, flooding is a major concern for Newington. The National Flood Insurance Program has paid 43 property damage claims in Newington totaling nearly $665,000 to-date. There have been 17 Repetitive Loss Property claims on five properties totaling over $643,000. A significant flood event could result in much damage. CRCOG used FEMA s Hazus-MH model to analyze the risks that the community might face from a major flood. The model estimates that economic losses to the town including residential and commercial damage and business interruptions due to a flood having a 1% chance of occurring any given year (the 100-year flood) would be nearly $16 million. The impacts of such a flood are summarized below: Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood Households Displaced 144 People Needing Shelter 283 Buildings at Least Moderately Damaged 23 Total Estimated Economic Losses $15,730,000 Total Residential Building & Content Losses $4,690,000 Total Commercial, Industrial & Other Building & Content Losses $8,930,000 Total Business Interruption Losses $70,000 The Town frequently experiences flooding in the Stamm Road area, which encompasses an industrial area and the Amtrak rail line. In fact, the Town contracted the Natural Resources Conservation Service to conduct a study of flood reduction alternatives for the area due to concern for the safety of residents, property owners, and Amtrak riders in light of recent flooding events. The existing flood insurance study did not factor in the potential for failures of the railroad embankment, which occur relatively frequently, therefore, a study using a more realistic flood model was needed. The NRCS study, completed in 2004, documents the flooding problems in this area and reviews several mitigation strategies. The report recommends removing the railroad spur line culvert, replacing existing culverts with box culverts sized to the 100-year flow level along the rail line, and installing various flood proofing measures for eight buildings on Stamm Rd. and Liberty St. The replacement of culverts would reduce the cost of flood 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 339

proofing measures. In addition, minor flooding conditions continue to be a problem in the following areas; at the intersection of Main and Dowd and Main and Harding, in the area of Mill Brook. To implement the recommendations of the 2004 NRCS study would require cooperation from Amtrak, as rail service would have to be suspended while tracks are removed and replaced. Given the amount of planned activity in this area, including the Hartford-New Britain Busway, New Haven- Springfield commuter rail service and plans for the Central CT State University campus, the risks for damages to property and life appear likely to increase. Therefore, the implementation of the NRCS flood reduction recommendations is a top priority although it will require the cooperation of multiple agencies, (Town, State, and Federal), and other regulating authorities and neighboring towns. In addition to flooding, the Town is also concerned with hurricanes and severe storms. Recently, the town has added the use of the Everbridge Notification System, providing the ability to target the whole town or selected areas. CRCOG also used FEMA s Hazus-MH model to analyze the risks that the Town of Newington might face from a hurricane as powerful as the 1938 hurricane. The model estimates that economic losses to the town including residential and commercial damage and business interruptions due to such a Category 3 hurricane would be almost $169 million. The impacts of such a storm are summarized below: Estimated Damages from a 1938 Strength Hurricane Households Displaced 55 People Needing Shelter 7 Buildings at Least Moderately Damaged 1,340 Buildings Completely Damaged 90 Total Estimated Economic Losses $168,800,000 Total Residential Building Losses $119,715,000 Total Commercial, Industrial & Other Building Losses $30,630,000 Total Business Interruption Losses $18,415,000 Total Debris Generated 30,900 tons Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 616 According to information from the Connecticut Department of Emergency Management and Homeland Security, the three federally declared natural disasters of 2011 resulted in total expenses to the municipality and other local agencies of over $2 million. These expenses include debris and snow removal, emergency protective measures and repairs to damaged infrastructure and buildings but do not include damages experienced by private citizens and businesses. 2011 Disasters Damage Amounts Eligible for 75% Reimbursement Under FEMA Public Assistance Program 100% of Amount Eligible for 75% Reimbursement Applicant: Municipality DR-1958-CT 2011 Snow DR-4023-CT Irene August 2011 DR-4046-CT Severe Weather Oct 2011 Alfred) Total Damages Eligible for Public Assistance Due to 2011 Disasters Town of Newington $65,803.73 $140,941.77 $1,975,847.48 $2,182,592.98 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 340

Goals, Objectives and Strategies GOAL: REDUCE THE LOSS OF LIFE AND PROPERTY AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES AS A RESULT OF FLOODING, HIGH WINDS AND SEVERE WINTER STORMS Objective 1: Reduce the likelihood of flooding by improving existing natural and artificial drainage systems. Strategic Actions: 1.1 Coordinate with Central CT State University, Amtrak, CT Department of Transportation and Northeast Utilities to implement recommendations of the NRCS study of Piper Brook/Stamm Road area and\or explore other alternatives (design initiatives) to ameliorate the flooding., Engineering Priority: Status: High This is an established practice. Town will review and continue correspondence with the State. Potential Funding Source: C.I.P., State and Federal Grants 1.2 Ensure that Amtrak properly maintains existing drainage system around rail bed. Status: This is an established practice. Potential Funding Source: Amtrak 1.3 Ensure Town properly maintains its drainage facilities near Stamm Road/Piper Brook complex. Status: This is an established practice. Potential Funding Source: C.I.P., General Fund 1.4 Notify Wilbur Smith, who is conducting the New Haven-Springfield commuter rail study, of town's flooding and rail safety concerns, and of NRCS study's recommendations. Lead: Town Planner Status: Completed. The NHHS rail project Environmental Assessment addresses the need to repair/replace the Piper Brook and Webster Brook stream crossings. (For the Plan Update, this strategic action will be replaced by the broader action below.) 1.5 Reduce the likelihood of flooding by improving existing natural and artificial drainage systems. Lead: Town Planner 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 341

Status: This is a new Initiative for this Plan Update, however, efforts are underway. In 2013, the Town established a Low Impact Development and Stormwater Manual and in March 2014, the Zoning Regulations were revised to require use of low impact development techniques. Efforts will continue through the development review process. Potential Funding Source: General Fund 1.6 Continue to support Metropolitan District Commission efforts to disconnect residential tie-ins to the sewer system. MDC will provide public outreach updates by informational sheets (i.e. flyers) and community meetings. Status: This is an established practice. Potential Funding Source: MDC : annual updates are expected Objective 2: Improve the ability of public works to prepare and respond to severe winter storms and other natural emergencies. Strategic Actions: 2.1 Plan and implement enhanced salt road treatment technology, including storage facility construction. Status: Completed 2.2 Continue to support CT DOT in state road treatment. Status: This is an established practice and will continue on an as needed basis. Potential Funding Source: general fund, state aid Objective 3: Improve the ability of public works and parks and recreation to prepare and respond to hurricanes/high wind events. Strategic Action: 3.1 Develop and implement street and public tree maintenance plan. Lead: Parks & Grounds 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 342

Status: Efforts have begun to develop this plan Potential Funding Source: general fund : completion is expected by the end of 2019. Objective 4: Ensure ability of municipal departments to respond to emergencies resulting from natural hazards. Strategic Actions: 4.1 Continue training through Local Emergency Planning Committee. Lead: Police, Fire, and other Management personnel Status: This is an established and sustained practice. Potential Funding Source: general fund, grants : annual training is anticipated 4.2 Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Lead: Town Manager, Fire, Police, and other Management personnel Status: This is a newly identified initiative; however, efforts are underway to ensure that local officials are familiar with the functions and capabilities of the EOC. The EOC is located in the new Police Station. The operations of the EOC will be maintained through the annual budget process. Potential Funding Source: general funds 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 343

Map 44: Newington Population Density, Dams and Flood Zones 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 344

Map 45: Newington Flood Plains, Repetitive Loss Areas, Dams and Important Facilities 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 345