Report on Ward 3. Prepared by the Burlington Economic Development Corporation

Similar documents
Average persons in household. Top three industries Post-secondary education (25 64 years) 7.1% Unemployment rate

Ward 3 Barrhaven. City of Ottawa Ward Profiles 2011 Census and National Household Survey POPULATION* 46, ,390. Total City of Ottawa Population

EMPLOYEE TENURE IN 2014

Kansas Department of Revenue Office of Policy and Research State Sales Tax Collections by NAICS

City of Edmonton Population Change by Age,

ECONOMIC OVERVIEW DuPage County, Illinois

Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX. January 8, 2018

Oxford County Labour Market Overview

FRIENDSWOOD PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM FORM

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

Economic Overview New York

Economic Overview. Lawrence, KS MSA

Market Study Report for the Municipality of Sioux Lookout. Prepared by:

Economic Overview Long Island

Economic Overview York County, South Carolina. February 14, 2018

Kansas Department of Revenue Office of Policy and Research State Sales Tax Collections by NAICS Calendar Year 2007 January-07.

June 9, Economic Overview Billings, MT MSA

Economic Overview Monterey County, California. July 22, 2016

Economic Overview Loudoun County, Virginia. October 23, 2017

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7

Economic Overview Long Island

Economic Overview Western New York

October 28, Economic Overview Yellowstone County, Montana

GOAL 6 FIRMS PARTICIPATING IN FOREIGN EXPORT TRADE

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION Office of Workforce Information and Performance 1100 North Eutaw Street Baltimore, MD 21201

Economic Overview Fairfax / Falls Church. October 23, 2017

Economic Overview Marlboro County Labor Shed. June 29, 2016

Economic Overview Capital District

Economic Overview Mohawk Valley

Economic Overview 45-Minute Commute From Airport Park. June 6, 2017

Economic Overview Prince William/Manassas. October 23, 2017

Economic Overview Plant City Region. April 5, 2017

An Economic Impact Analysis of a Proposed Downtown Centre for the City of Moncton

A Profile of Workplaces in Waterloo Region

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Procter Properties P.O. Box 3484 Greensboro, NC

2016 Labor Market Profile

Mid - City Industrial

Ontario Economic Accounts

Sole Proprietorship Returns, 2004

Daniel Jung CRENSHAW BLVD CRENSHAW BLVD INGLEWOOD CA, CA Priming Capital 6 Centerpointe Dr La Palma, CA

Economic Impact Analysis of Fort Steele National Heritage Town. Final Report. By:

Tyler Area Economic Overview

September Caddo Kiowa Technology Center. Economy Overview

7409 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28411

Glanworth Neighbourhood Profile

Brockley Neighbourhood Profile

Shingle Creek. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis. October 2011

Economy Overview Champaign-Urbana, IL

White Pine County Economic Overview

Québec City. Summary and Highlights. Innovation Systems Research Network. City-Region Profile

Economic Overview Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC MSA. October 27, 2017

Savannah Agee Direct:

Toronto. Summary and Highlights. Innovation Systems Research Network. City-Region Profile, Gregory M. Spencer a and Tara Vinodrai b

Economy Overview Champaign County, IL

Labrador City. Summary and Highlights. Innovation Systems Research Network. City-Region Profile

Kitchener. Summary and Highlights. Innovation Systems Research Network. City-Region Profile, Gregory M. Spencer a and Tara Vinodrai b

Edmonton. Summary and Highlights. Innovation Systems Research Network. City-Region Profile, Gregory M. Spencer a and Tara Vinodrai b

Calgary. Summary and Highlights. Innovation Systems Research Network. City-Region Profile, Gregory M. Spencer a and Tara Vinodrai b

Saskatoon. Summary and Highlights. Innovation Systems Research Network. City-Region Profile, Gregory M. Spencer a and Tara Vinodrai b

Québec. Summary and Highlights. Innovation Systems Research Network. City-Region Profile, Gregory M. Spencer a and Tara Vinodrai b

Employment Data (establishment)

University of Minnesota

newstats 2016 NWT Annual Labour Force Activity NWT Bureau of Statistics Overview

Kavet, Rockler & Associates, LLC

St. Catharines - Niagara

Demographics for 2020 S Main St, South Jacksonville, Illinois, United States

2017 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

542 employers completed the EmployerOne Survey

Camden Industrial. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis.

Rathwood. Community Profile. expansion and parks development completed most of the community.

Table 1: Major Indicators of Labor Market Activity for New Jersey Seasonally Adjusted 2016 Benchmark Labor Force Data (resident)

Economic Impact Study Sports City, St. Albert, Alberta

SASKATCHEWAN WAGE SURVEY 2013: MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY DETAILED REPORT

Make it Fair in Sudbury! Regional Perspective Who would improvements to employment laws directly affect?

Reference Point May 2015

Regional Prosperity Initiative: Labor Market Information Supplement

Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education

Town Profiles: Demographic, Economic, and Housing Statistics for De Smet City and Wall Town, SOuth Dakota

4.0 Retail Market: Demand Analysis

Economic Base Analysis

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

October Mid-Del Technology Center. Economy Overview

SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

New products and studies 19

Unemployment Rate Edges Lower to 5.0 Percent Employment Down in December

Community Colleges of Spokane

Socio-economic Profile for Northeastern Region Community Futures Development Corporation. Prepared for: FedNor/Industry Canada

A Collection of Statistical Data for Huron County and its Census Subdivisions

Woodlands County Economic Indicators 2015

A Profile of the Aboriginal Population in Surrey, BC

Highlights. For the purpose of this profile, the population is defined as women 15+ years.

Trends in Labour Productivity in Alberta

Highlands and Islands Enterprise. Location Profile Keith December 2011

Special Purpose Industrial. Commercial. Residential. Mixed Use. Use Category Specific Use Type. Zoning Districts. Ref NAICS.

Economy Overview. Navarro County, TX. Emsi Q Data Set

DALRON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED

Merchant Referral Program Introduction

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

IAG Commercial. Albertville Retail - Land. For Sale. Prepared By:

Transcription:

Report on Ward 3 Prepared by the Burlington Economic Development Corporation

Contents 1. Business Composition Data... 1 2. Labour Force Data... 3 3. Consumer Spending Data... 5 4. Demographic Data... 6 5. Transportation and Commuting Patterns... 8 6. Development Activity and Vacant Land... 9 Data for Burlington is available from multiple sources. There may be discrepancies in some numbers. This report uses demographic and economic data as provided by Environics Analytics, adapted by Burlington Economic Development Corporation (BEDC). It is worth noting that business counts in particular vary considerably from Canadian Business Counts statistics.

The data included in this report details the current state of Ward 3, an economy based heavily in services. Nearly a third of employment is in knowledge-based and institutional industries and is supplemented by a diverse array of economic activities (Table 1). Ward 3 is populated by well educated, and fiscally prosperous residents with 25% having attained a university degree and 47% of households earning over $100,000 annually, with an average household income of $127,445. 1. Business Composition Data Knowing the make-up of businesses within an area is essential to understanding that area s economy. Business composition is an effective way to evaluate the demand for specific goods and services in the area, as well as a location s economic diversity. Below is the makeup of businesses by industry within Ward 3, organized by the industry with the most business to the fewest. Source: Environics Analytics, 2017 Table 1 Business Composition in Ward 3 Business Classification Number of Businesses Percentage Other Services - Repair, Personal Care, Laundry, Religious, etc. 84 17.14% Retail: Home, Food, Automobiles, Personal Care 64 13.06% Health Care and Social Services 50 10.20% Construction 44 8.98% Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 37 7.55% Accommodation and Food Services 32 6.53% Retail: Hobby, Media, General Merchandise 25 5.10% Banking, Finance and Insurance 23 4.69% Administrative and Support and Waste Management and 22 4.49% Remediation Services Arts, Sports, Entertainment, and Recreation 18 3.67% Wholesalers 14 2.86% Education 14 2.86% Manufacturing - Electronics, Furniture, Machinery, Metal, 12 2.45% Transportation, Misc. Transportation and Warehousing: Private and Public 11 2.24% Transportation, Oil and Gas Pipelines, Sightseeing Information 11 2.24% Unclassified 10 2.04% Real Estate and Rentals 9 1.84% Public Administration 4 0.82% Manufacturing - Chemical, Fuel, Paper, Plastic, Wood 3 0.61% Manufacturing - Processed Food, Textiles, Clothing 2 0.41% Mineral, Oil and Gas Extraction 1 0.20% Total 490 100.00% 1 B E D C

Figure 1 Business Composition in Ward 3 18% 24% Knowledge-Based & Institutional Population-Related Employment Land 56% Source: BEDC Calculation based on Environics Analytics, 2017 The business composition Figure above displays the classification of businesses within Ward 3, which have been aggregated into more succinct categories from Table 1: - Knowledge Based & Institutional: Banking and financial fields, law, real estate, professional, scientific, and technical services, government, and education. - Population Related: Retail, healthcare and social services, food and accommodation services, arts and entertainment, and other service related establishment; repair, personal care, laundry, etc. - Employment Land: Wholesale, manufacturing, construction, transportation and warehousing, and resource related; agriculture, oil, utilities, etc. The Figure indicates that the makeup of Ward 3 s business community is highly population-related based, with 56% of 490 businesses falling into the category with high retail and other services present. The knowledge-based and institutional category makes up nearly a quarter of businesses with 120 being present. Table 1 above, provides a more detailed business composition view by breaking down the categories into more specific classifications. Retail (home, food, automobiles, personal care) and Other Services (repair, personal care, laundry, religious, etc.) make up 30% of total business and fall into the population-related category. The construction industry in the employment land category makes up 8.98% of businesses and is the fourth largest classification. The top five classifications make up 57% of all businesses in Ward 3. 2 B E D C

Table 2 Largest Employers in Ward 3 Employer Full-Time Onsite Total Employees Employees Business Description Halton District School Board 305 3035 Educational support services Sunshine Building Maintenance Inc. 20 392 Janitorial services (except window cleaning) Costco 174 375 Department stores Source: Halton Employment Survey, 2017 2. Labour Force Data Labour Force Data is important to augment understanding of economic activity in Ward 3 in addition to the aforementioned business composition. This is based on the people that live in the area and may work inside or outside of it. The following data displays labour force employment by occupation. Table 3 Labour Force Employment in Ward 3 Occupations in Ward 3 Number of Employees Percentage Sales and service occupations 2,847 24% Business, finance and administration occupations 1,772 15% Trades, transport and equipment operators and related 1,655 14% occupations Occupations in education, law and social, community and 1,399 12% government services Management occupations 1,265 11% Natural and applied sciences and related occupations 926 8% Health occupations 915 8% Occupations in art, culture, recreation and sport 376 3% Occupations in manufacturing and utilities 337 3% Natural resources, agriculture and related production 256 2% occupations Total 11,748 100% 3 B E D C

Percent of Residents Figure 2 Labour Force Data for Ward 3 8% 8% 3% 3% 2% Sales and service occupations 24% Business, finance and administration occupations Trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations Occupations in education, law and social, community and government services Management occupations 11% 12% 14% 15% Natural and applied sciences and related occupations Health occupations Occupations in art, culture, recreation and sport Occupations in manufacturing and utilities Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations The labour force data shows that Ward 3 has a high number of sales and service job employees, with nearly a quarter of employment in this category. The second and third largest categories: business, finance and administrative, and trades, transport and equipment operators and related occupations make up 29% of employment and are knowledge based. Figure 3 Employment Type by Gender in Ward 3 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Full-Time Part-Time At Home Male Female Source: BEDC Adaptation based on Transportation Tomorrow Survey, 2018 4 B E D C

Dollars Spent 3. Consumer Spending Data BEDC also has available consumer spending data. This is yet another way to analyse Ward 3 s economy. Below is a table and graphical representation of this data. Table 4 Household Spending in Ward 3 Consumption in Ward 3 Spending per Household Percentage Shelter $25,187 24.50% Transportation $16,320 15.88% Food $14,820 14.42% Recreation $6,679 6.50% Insurance and Pension Contributions $6,370 6.20% Household Operations $5,739 5.58% Household Furnishings and Equipment $4,675 4.55% Clothing $4,466 4.34% Health Care $4,442 4.32% Tobacco and Alcohol $3,201 3.11% Personal care $2,588 2.52% Gifts and Contributions $2,539 2.47% Education $2,122 2.06% Miscellaneous Expenditures $1,830 1.78% Games of Chance $1,331 1.29% Reading/Printed Matter $492 0.48% Total $102,801 100.00% Figure 4 Household Spending in Ward 3 $30,000 $25,000 25% $20,000 $15,000 16% 14% $10,000 6% 6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% $5,000 $0 Goods and Services 5 B E D C

Number of Residents 4. Demographic Data Ward 3 has a population of 24,060 people, making up 8,875 households of which nearly 85% are owneroccupied. The average household income is $127,445. Figure 5 Residents by Gender Figure 6 Residents by Home Ownership 16% 1,421 51% 12,202 49% 11,858 Male Female 84% 7,454 Owner-Occupied Dwellings Renter-Occupied Dwellings 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 Figure 7 Highest Level of Educational Achievement in Ward 3 0 < Grade 9 High school Apprenticeship or trade diploma College or CEGEP diploma Educational Attainment University diploma below bachelor University degree Table 5 Household Summary, Ward 3 Source: Transportation Tomorrow Survey, 2018 6 B E D C

Number of Households Number of Residents 2.19% 1.94% 3.14% 5.52% 5.12% 4.55% 5.37% 5.41% 6.00% 6.12% 6.16% 5.52% 7.41% 7.19% 6.48% 6.52% 7.38% 8.00% Figure 8 Age Distribution in Ward 3 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Age Groups Figure 9 Household Income Distribution in Ward 3 4500 47.01% 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 5.21% 9.88% 12.85% 13.25% 11.81% 0 Less than $20,000 $20,000 To $39,999 $40,000 To $59,999 Income Levels $60,000 To $79,999 $80,000 To $99,999 $100,000 Or Over 7 B E D C

5. Transportation and Commuting Patterns A significant population travels into Ward 3 from surrounding areas during normal commuting hours. The vast majority of these trips are made by car, with 83% of the 6,100 trips taken by either drivers or passengers. Within Ward 3, 12% of residents use alternative modes of travel (Transit, GO Train, Walk/Cycle and Other) during morning commuting hours. Table 6 Trips Made by Residents of Ward 3 HB-W: Home-based work: Home to work and work to home HB-S: Home-based school: Home to school and school to home HB-D: Home-based discretionary: All other home-based trips N-HB: Non-home-based: All trips where neither end is home Source: Transportation Tomorrow Survey, 2018 Table 7 Trips Made to Ward 3 by Residents of Survey Area Source: Transportation Tomorrow Survey, 2018 Figure 10 Mode of Transportation by Ward 3 Residents, 6:00-9:00AM 4% 2% 2% 4% 12% 75% Driver Passenger Transit GO Train Walk/Cycle Other Source: Transportation Tomorrow Survey, 2018 8 B E D C

6. Development Activity and Vacant Land Figure 11 Ward 3 Development Applications Table 8 Current Development Applications Applicant Site Address Notes 1053052 Ontario Inc. and 2076 and 2086 Meadowbrook Rd. Proposal for a total of 7 townhouse units 1906452 Ontario Ltd, Table 9 Vacant Employment Land Applicant Site Address Size (Ha) Zoning 946489 Ontario Limited 1150 Pettit Rd. 0.16 GE2 9 B E D C