KAPI'OLANI CC OPERATIONAL POLICY

Similar documents
Policy, Planning and Assessment Council (PPAC)

North Orange County Community College District Integrated. Planning Manual March 2014 Update

Budget Reform Update. Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning

UW-STOUT Annual Operating Budget Process

Administrative Procedures Integrated Planning and Budgeting (IPB) Model

Chancellor s Advisory Council Meeting Notes Tuesday, June 13, :30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Naio 203 Facilitator: Interim Chancellor Louise Pagotto

Title: Chancellor's Advisory Council Meeting Agenda Place: Tamarind Room, `Ōhelo Building Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 Time: 2:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m.

Accreditation Action Plan for Removal of Probation presented to the LACCD Board of Trustees. Aug. 22, 2012 Los Angeles Harbor College

Resource Allocation Charter Document

UW-Platteville Pioneer Budget Model

Planning and Budgeting Integration (PBI) Model

CHARTER PLANNING COUNCIL

UNTHSC. Annual Budget Development Process Fiscal Year 2019 Guidelines & Instructions - Spring 2018

ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING WORKSHEET (APPW)

I. INTRODUCTION II. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

California State University, Los Angeles University Resource Allocation Process for Change CURRENT ALLOCATION MODEL OVERVIEW

Version 2.0- Project. Q: What is the current status of your project? A: Completed

California Community Colleges/Districts Funding Model Proposal Submitted to Chancellor Oakley December 20, 2017

IDENTIFICATION AR II /15/06 THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE. Part 1. THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE

Sacramento City College

We produced the Strategic Planning Process (SPP) using the following design principles:

Saddleback College Strategic Planning Process. Recommended by the Consultation Council, 6/16/09 Approved by the President, 6/23/09 Revised, 8/6/09

Carry Forward of Year End Funds

q. PLANNING, RESOURCE, AND BUDGET COMMITTEE CURRENT

EXHIBIT A ENDOWMENT AGREEMENT. THE ENDOWMENT FUND at the University of Houston

GUIDING PRINCIPLES UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA STRATEGIC INVESTMENT FUND

POLICY STATEMENT NO EFFECTIVE: February 15, 1986 PAGE: 1 of 3. REVISED: August 30, 2004

Finance Reform. Speaker Series March

Integrated Resource Planning Process University of Wisconsin-Parkside June 21, 2012

On behalf of the Resource Allocation Task Force (RATF), I am pleased to forward you our final report. Your charge to the RATF was:

Educational Master Plan for

Competency Profile: A breakdown of the general areas of competencies into specific competency statements.

ACCJC March 2015 Response - Recommendation 8. Draft as of September 29, 2014

Standard III. D FINANCIAL RESOURCES

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROCESS

USF SYSTEM ANNUAL STRATEGIC BUDGET PLANNING PROCESS OVERVIEW

Resource Allocation Handbook FY

New Mexico Highlands University Annual Operating Budget Process. approved Fall 2016

Budget Preparation Manual FY

Office of the Academic Senate One Washington Square San Jose, California Fax:

Resource Allocation, Management, and Planning Steering Committee #7

Transition Review Team Report to President Stearns August 2017

FAQs Finance and Budget Modeling Initiative

December 13, The Asia-Pacific Risk Management and Insurance Program

ANNUAL STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT AUGUST 21, 2012

CATEGORY 8 PLANNING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

The Criterion Two Team found that Estrella Mountain has demonstrated effective organization of its financial resources through the following

University Budget Advisory Committee Composition

Strategic Plan Design, Execution & Assessment to Meet Governing Board Priorities

BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS University Administrators Forum February 6, 2013

District Office Administrative Services Unit Review (ASUR) and Annual Operational Planning

POLICY RECOMMENDATION THE PLANNING AND BUDGET PROCESS AT SJSU

Resource Allocation, Management, and Planning Presentation for Board of Regents

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Hostos Community College Budget Process

Sequoias Community College District RESOURCE

The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Annual Operating Budget Preparation FY

Budget Model Assessment

BP 2220 Committees of the Board

Version Page 1 of 7

SUMMARY OF KEY BUDGET MODEL ISSUES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS

ASL Budget Forum. May 8, 2017

DEANS, VICE CHANCELLORS, UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN, ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NKU s New Budget Model

UWM Budget Model Development: Proposal for a New Incentive Based Resource Allocation Model Prepared by the Budget Model Working Group

Transition to a New Budget Model at the University of Toronto. CAUBO June 17, 2008

What is Responsibility Centered Management?

Finance and Budget Modeling Town Hall. March 27 & 28, 2018

University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh Green Fund Committee Policies and Procedure Manual

October 2, Integrated Planning Resource Allocation & Achievement

Adopting a Different Approach to University Budgeting February 10, 2016

A "bottom-line" constraint, which in itself becomes a financial performance target

Components of the Implementation Process

POLICY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

1.103 Policy Development and Approval Process

New Campus Budget Model

KSU Policy Category: Facilities Page 1 of 5

STRATEGIC PLAN CORE DOCUMENT

CW/P. F a c i l i t i e s M a s t e r P l a n S e p t e m b e r 8,

MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY Budget Stakeholder Report Fiscal Year 2016

THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY STRATEGIC BUDGET PLANNING FISCAL YEAR 2015

Approve Student Housing Rental Rates at UW Tacoma

SUBJECT: Auxiliary & Self Supporting Activities (ASSA) - Differential Income Rate Review

University Financial and Budget Planning Principles Vice-President (Finance & Corporate Services)

STRATEGIES ASSESSMENT

UW Bothell Student Housing: Budget and Rate Development Process Improvement Plan HOUSING BUDGET & RATES DEVELOPMENT PROCESS PLAN

Best Practices in Budgeting for Community Colleges

GFOA Best Practices and Budget Awards Program (Community Colleges) April 8, Spring ICCCFO Conference

Facilities Planning (Revised 2016)

21 st Century Budgeting April 29, ICCCFO Spring Conference

Breakfast for Progress. Ensuring a Sustainable Financial Future at Ohio University

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I COMMUNITY COLLEGES POLICY

PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND STUDENT LEARNING

THE DEVELOPMENT AND ISSUANCE OF COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES. 4.1 Development and Issuance of College Administrative Policies

Policy on Policies Policy

Oral and written testimony of M. Angelo before the BOR on 2/11/16 regarding the UHM budget model

Budget Town Hall Meeting

USF System Annual Strategic Budget Planning Process

Introduction to the UND s New Budget Model

University Planning Phase 1. Organizational and Process Enhancements

Transcription:

KAPI'OLANI CC OPERATIONAL POLICY KOP #1.111 Created March 14, 2014 Revised January 31, 2017 SUBJECT: Planning and Assessment Integration with Resource Allocation (PAIR) 1. Purpose: a. The primary purpose of this policy is to serve as the framework for a transparent and participatory planning, assessment and resource allocation process that integrates the various components of these activities into a systemic process that assures that academic, administrative, and facilities planning and resource allocation are related to student success, strategic planning and program outcomes assessment. The process will have established tasks and milestones and can be completed in time to meet established University system budget making deadlines and to ensure systematic participation from among the established college governing bodies as well as program faculty, staff, and administrators; b. This policy will also serve to ensure that: i. The College s integrated process is consistent with the University of Hawai'i Board of Regents approved mission for the University, the Community Colleges and the College ii. iii. iv. Planning takes into consideration the evolving economic, educational, and social needs of the community; Program design and improvement efforts are consistent with priorities detailed in the currently approved University system and college Strategic Plan; Resource allocation decisions are consistent with the implementation of the college Student Success Pathway and the improvement of established programs and services; v. The results of a regular assessment of program and service outcomes inform the planning, budgeting and program design and delivery; and, vi. A transparent planning, resource allocation, and assessment process that has established tasks and milestones to ensure systematic participation from among the established college governing bodies as well as program faculty, staff, and administrators is implemented. 2. Policy: It is the policy of Kapi olani Community College that the planning, budgeting, and assessment process consist of the following:

Planning and Assessment Integrated with Resource Allocation (PAIR) January 31, 2017 Page 2 a. A college Student Success Pathway that is reviewed annually for progress, and by which the college Strategic Plan, Annual Report of Program Data (ARPD), and Comprehensive Program Review (CPR) are aligned. The Comprehensive Program Review is reviewed every five years and the college Strategic Plan is reviewed yearly for progress and updated every six years. b. An implementation plan, which details the activities that will be undertaken to accomplish the established Student Success Pathway and Strategic Plan Outcomes and Performance Measures. The implementation plan includes (see attachment 2 for an example of the elements): i. The administrator accountable for the specific implementation activity; ii. Other individuals involved in the implementation; iii. A brief description of the implementation activity; iv. The additional resources (if any) needed to accomplish the planned implementation; and v. Estimated timeline for completion or established objectives as described. c. A resource allocation process that includes: i. A current service annual base budget determined by an analysis of the continued need for the level of service or instructional capacity. 1. The continued need and level of service required shall be discussed in the program review. ii. An opportunity for each program and service to seek additional resources beyond the Current Service to achieve a Student Success Pathway outcome. iii. A 5-year needs requirements (budget) projection that is completed by all programs, offices, and activities. 1. The 5-year projection shall include all expenditures that a program, office, or activity will incur and all revenues that will be gained by the program, office, or activity. iv. A multi-year campus financial plan incorporating anticipated revenues and expenses, including the resource requirements of full implementation of the Student Success Pathway. v. A published annual schedule or timeline of major activities and deadlines (See Attachment 3 for the Annual Budget Development Flow Chart) as it relates to the College Cycle. d. An assessment process that includes: i. Annual program health indicators assessment of programs and services; ii. A multi-year roll-up assessment of programs and services; and iii. An annual report or review on the progress toward accomplishing outcomes as established in the Student Success Pathway.

Planning and Assessment Integrated with Resource Allocation (PAIR) January 31, 2017 Page 3 e. A campus-wide consultation process that involves the Administrative Staff Council, as well as each of the established governing bodies (see KOP #1.112) in the implementation of strategic priorities and resource allocation decisions. f. Attachment 1 is a graphic representation of the process. 3. Related Policies: a. University of Hawai`i Board of Regents Policy Chapter 4, PLANNING; (http://www.hawaii.edu/offices/bor/policy/borpch4.pdf) b. University of Hawaii Executive Policy 4.201, INTEGRATED LONG-RANGE PLANNING FRAMEWORK (http://www.hawaii.edu/apis/ep/e4/e4201.pdf) c. University of Hawaii Community Colleges Policy; UHCCP 4.101 STRATEGIC ACADEMIC PLANNING (http://www.hawaii.edu/offices/cc/docs/policies/4.101.pdf) d. University of Hawaii Community Colleges Policy; UHCCP 5.202 REVIEW OF ESTABLISHED PROGRAMS (http://www.hawaii.edu/offices/cc/docs/policies/5.202.pdf) e. Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC); ACCREDITATION STANDARDS 2014. (http://www.accjc.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/10/accreditation_standards_2014_with_ba_degree_highlights_10 _19_2015.pdf) 4. Responsibilities The Chancellor s Advisory Council (CAC), consistent with its approved charter and by-laws, shall make recommendations to the Chancellor on the college Student Success Pathway, including the major priorities within the plan; the Implementation Plan, including annual revisions; and the resource allocation plan, including the annual allocation plan. Each of the college governing groups established through KOP #1.112, consistent with their respective charters and by-laws, shall evaluate all resource requests, make additional requests if necessary, and transmit their priorities to the CAC for consideration in the development of the college resource allocation plan. The Chancellor in consultation with other administrators and the established governing bodies shall develop and maintain a policy framework that integrates the planning, implementation, resource allocation, and assessment processes into an integrated well functioning system; shall approve an annual college budget and resource allocation plan; and shall periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the planning, resource allocation, and assessment system. The Vice Chancellor for Administrative Services shall establish and publish an annual Resource Allocation timetable that allows for adequate participation from each program and division, as well as consultation with the College leadership as well as each established governing group. The Vice Chancellors and Deans shall establish and maintain up-to-date implementation plans that are designed to meet the requirements of the College s strategic plan. The Vice Chancellor for Academic

Planning and Assessment Integrated with Resource Allocation (PAIR) January 31, 2017 Page 4 Affairs in collaboration with the Deans, Directors, and other Vice Chancellors shall consolidate the various implementations into a single plan for review and consultation with the Planning Council each fall according to the annual Resource Allocation timetable published by the Vice Chancellor for Administrative Services. The Vice Chancellors and Deans in collaboration with the College Leadership Team shall solicit from among their programs all requests for additional resources according to the annual Resource Allocation guidelines and timetable published by the Vice Chancellor for Administrative Affairs. This policy supersedes all existing KCC policies and procedures related to strategic planning, budgeting and assessment. APPROVED Louise Pagotto, Interim Chancellor January 31, 2017

Academic Year 16-17 Budget Process Flowchart Strategic Plan ARF discussion to properly vet and prioritize should be ongoing Program Review/Annual Report Student Success Pathway(s) (2/24/17) ARF(s) Prepared ARF(s) due to DC/Unit Hd or Administrator* (3/3/17) ARF(s) due to Dean or VC for further discussion (3/10/17) ARF(s) due to VC for further discussion (3/24/17) *Administrator that is next in line CAC Budget Workgroup Recommendation made to full CAC (6/2/17) AGOs prioritized ARFs due to VCAS (5/5/17) Town Hall (optional) (4/21/17) ARF listing and completed ARFs sent to AGOs for further discussion (4/14/17) Submit vetted and prioritized ARFs due to VCAS (Budget Admin) (3/31/17) CAC makes ARF recommendations to Chancellor (6/16/17) Chancellor makes final decision on approved ARFs (6/30/17) 5 yr budget plan (base budget and new funding) revision submitted to VCAS (6/9/17) Final Budget Allocation

Annual Budget Development Time Line Attachment 4