IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Similar documents
Case 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * ******* SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : Hon. INDICTMENT

Case 2:17-cr GMS Document 3 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 3:13-cr KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:13-cr AWT Document 2 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Criminal NO. 3:13CR~S (llwrj -'"

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT V. INDICTMENT NO. * * * * * COUNT 1 18 U.S.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. No. INDICTMENT UNDER SEAL COUNT ONE

2G17 SEP 2 6 Prl 3 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,('--,,; _.._ "9RIMINAL NO. 3:17CFJ:lj._J_/ftfn

Case 2:14-cr JAR Document 1 Filed 08/06/14 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2017 EXHIBIT A

Case 4:15-cr WTM-GER Document 1 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

3:06-ar Date Filed 11/01/2006 Entry Number 259 (Court only) Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * ****** INDICTMENT. COUNT ONE (Wire Fraud)

INDICTMENT COUNT ONE. The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland charges that: Introduction

Case 1:10-cr BEL Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:17-cr AT-CMS Document 7 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 18

Case 1:05-cr RWR Document 1 Filed 08/04/2005 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:13-cr ES Document 11 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID: 62

Case 1:14-cr PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

RECEIVED SEP Case 3:18-cr MAS Document 64 Filed 09/25/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 89 WILLAM T. WALSHJ.D STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. Introduction

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (TOPEKA DOCKET)

Case 5:09-cr D Document 1 Filed 04/16/09 Page 1 of 8

- - X CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE IEEPA AND THE ITR AND TO CONDUCT AN UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS. Background

Case 1:18-cr LY Document 3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS jp PH 1: 21 AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cr CMH Document 12 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39

us OJ $TRICT COUR-1 RIO/\

FILED IN OPEN COURT U.S.D.C. Atlanta

-v.- : 10 Cr. ( ) Defendant. : COUNT ONE (Bank Fraud) THE DEFENDANT AND HIS ACCOMPLICE, HASSAN NEMAZEE

Case 3:18-cr BTM Document 1 Filed 06/29/18 PageID.9 Page 1 of 11. saf/\laif;\ co CASE UNSEALED PER ORDER OF COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City Docket) Case No. 09- I N D I C T M E N T COUNT ONE THE CONSPIRACY

Case 1:10-cr REB Document 5 Filed 06/08/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment: 1. The defendants MATTHEW BURSTEIN, ELIAS COMPRES,

Case 2:18-cr JS Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 INTRODUCTION

Case 1:13-cr RWS-ECS Document 1 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. No. 1 : 18 - C R - Q 74. Count One

DAVID B. CHALMERS, JR., : S1 05 Cr. 59 (DC) JOHN IRVING, LUDMIL DIONISSIEV, : BAYOIL (USA), INC., and BAYOIL SUPPLY & TRADING LIMITED, : COUNT ONE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:06-cr Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN (WATERLOO) DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 18-CR-2058.

COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud) RELEVANT PERSONS AND ENTITIES

Case 2:12-cr RWS Document 1 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: INTRODUCTION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

COUNT ONE (The Tax Shelter Fraud Conspiracy) Background

Case 3:06-cr JWS-JDR Document 149 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 27

Case 1:14-cr JEI Document 28 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID: 105 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THEDISTRICTOFNEW JERSEY

2:11-cr MPM -DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cr EWN Document 169 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:10-cr PLF Document 1 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:09-cr PAB Document 1 Filed 08/27/2009 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:12-cr SD Document 1 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:12-cr WYD Document 1 Filed 10/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

ROOKSIJOHNSON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. BERRY LOUIDORT RALPH MICHEL and LAUREN JASKY,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 4:15-cr Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/27/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 2:12-cr WHW Document 1 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE. INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA INDICTMENT FOR HOBBS ACT EXTORTION, FAILURE TO FILE TAX RETURNS, AND ILLEGAL STRUCTURING

Case 2:13-cr LDD Document 24 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:12-cr CM Document 1 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 1 Filed 12/20/2005 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

INTRODUCTION TO ALL COUNTS. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless otherwise indicated:

- 1 - IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cr CM Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

Case 1:08-cr Document 3 Filed 08/07/2008 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINE SVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 1 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOF EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 12 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 27

Case 3:07-cr RRB Document 366 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 1 of 34

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

ALI-ABA Topical Courses Offshore Tax Evasion & Bank Secrecy Update September 13, 2010 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast. Indictment

Case 3:15-cr JRS Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:17-cr AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of X X. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act)

ORIGINAL c:iled \!'\ CH..1E.EHS

.~---- UNITED STATES DISTRICT. June 2 O O 1 Grand Jury UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, .Plaintiff,

Case: 5:12-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/15/12 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division. Count 1: Count 2: CRIMINAL INFORMATION.

FILED SEP A. Parties, Relevant Persons, and Entities

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

v. INDICTMENT NO. "-;fklt',j ~-- lfr/t

Case 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 192 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA ) ) )

Case 1:17-cr NGG Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1. - against - Cr. No. (T. 15, U.S.C., 80b-6, 80b-I4 and 80b-17;

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

#"WrBr, :1'ly3':lT:i9iI1YI95.!. rmk:sss MAtsuMoTO, J. ---x. Derendan. tt;l&#iuti,u,u;:etljfr'i!t'j*, I F\A/ [/ I

Case: 4:15-cr CDP-JMB Doc. #: 2 Filed: 07/23/15 Page: 1 of 16 PageID #: 11

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 7. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

INTRODUCTION TO ALL COUNTS. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless otherwise indicated:

DAVID MAKOL, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and charges as follows: COUNT ONE

Case 2:16-cr RWS-JCF Document 1 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION INDICTMENT. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud) A.

COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy To Commit Securities Fraud) RELEVANT PERSONS AND ENTITIES. 1. At all times relevant to this Indictment, SafeNet,

Transcription:

MJC/2008R00659 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : Criminal No. v. : : OTIS RAY HOPE, and : (Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE, : 18 U.S.C. 1349; Bank Fraud, 18 : U.S.C. 1344; Aiding and Abetting, Defendants. : 18 U.S.C. 2; Forfeiture, 18 U.S.C. : 982(a)(2)(A))...oOo... INDICTMENT COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud) The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland charges that: Introduction 1. At all times relevant to this Indictment, Shiloh Ministries of Hagerstown, Inc. (the Shiloh Company ), was a Maryland corporation organized as a nonprofit company for the purpose of conducting religious and charitable activities within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. At all times relevant to this Indictment, the defendants, OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE, were trustees of the Shiloh Company and at various times served as its president. 2. At all times relevant to this Indictment, the Shiloh Company owned a commercial building located at 149 North Potomac Street, Hagerstown, Maryland, having purchased it on January 17, 2002 from the Young Men s Christian Association of Hagerstown, Maryland, Inc. 3. At all times relevant to this Indictment, the Shiloh Company operated a business within the building at 149 North Potomac Street, Hagerstown, Maryland. The name of the business was the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center. At all times relevant to this

Indictment, OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE supervised and managed the business affairs of the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center, including renovating and maintaining the building and leasing the space therein to groups for conferences and retreats. 4. On or about March 7, 2006, OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE applied for a commercial loan from the Sovereign Bank on behalf of the Shiloh Company in the amount of $1.7 million. The purpose of the loan was to refinance existing debt and to make improvements to the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center. On or about May 31, 2006, the Sovereign Bank approved the loan and provided the Shiloh Company with the requested funds except for approximately $390,000, which was held in escrow to pay for renovations and the remediation of environmental problems. Some of the escrow funds were subsequently released to construction companies associated with OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE. 5. On or about June 21, 2006, there was a fire at the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center that caused substantial damage to the building. As the primary lienholder on the property, Sovereign Bank received the proceeds from the fire insurance policy and held those funds in escrow until completion of the fire restoration. Most of the escrow funds were subsequently released to the Kabel Company, LLC, a company that had been incorporated by OTIS RAY HOPE in the State of Nevada on July 25, 2006. 6. On or about August 24, 2006, the Sovereign Bank sent the Shiloh Company a letter stating that a final disbursement of funds from the fire restoration escrow would not be made until certain conditions were met, including the issuance of a Fire Marshal Inspection Report and a new Certificate of Occupancy. Notwithstanding this letter, the Shiloh Company never sought approval from the Building Inspector or the Fire Marshal for the City of Hagerstown 2

to reoccupy the building. The company never held any more retreats or conferences after the date of the fire, and the building remained unoccupied except for a live-in caretaker. 7. On or about September 28, 2006, OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE contacted a mortgage broker with the initials J.B. for the purpose of refinancing the mortgage with Sovereign Bank and to bring about the release of the balance of the escrow funds that Sovereign Bank had been holding for renovations, fire restoration and environmental remediation. 8. On or about December 28, 2006, the Bank of America, N.A. ( Bank of America ), issued a preliminary commitment to refinance the mortgage with Sovereign Bank in the amount of $1.75 million. At all times relevant to this Indictment, the Bank of America was a financial institution within the meaning of Title 18, Unites States Code, Section 20, its deposits were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and it had offices in Rockville, Maryland and elsewhere in the State of Maryland. 9. As part of the loan application process, the Shiloh Company was required to provide the Bank of America with various documents to substantiate the company s ability to repay the loan from the rental income received from the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center. At all times relevant to this Indictment, OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE, on behalf of the Shiloh Company, compiled and submitted, and caused to be compiled and submitted, the documentation required by the Bank of America, including the company s past and current year s financial statements, minutes from the company s annual meetings, and a corporate resolution authorizing the company to borrow money from the Bank of America. 10. On or about February 28, 2007, the Bank of America gave final approval for the loan and provided the Shiloh Company with funding in the amount of $1.75 million. In addition 3

to being credited at settlement for the loan amount of $1.75 million, which was sufficient to pay off the outstanding loan balance and fees owed to Sovereign Bank, the Shiloh Company also received a credit from Sovereign Bank in the amount $108,835, which represented the remaining balances in the various escrow accounts. 11. On March 2, 2007, the settlement company wired the net proceeds from the loan closing, totaling approximately $77,640, to a bank account in the name of the Kabel Company, LLC, at the Hancock Bank in Gulfport, Mississippi. OTIS RAY HOPE had opened the bank account in the name of the Kabel Company, LLC, on December 4, 2006 and he was the only signatory on the account. 12. Subsequent to receiving the loan proceeds from the Bank of America, the Shiloh Company never made a monthly loan payment. Ultimately, the Bank of America was forced to write off virtually all of the outstanding loan balance and accrued interest. The Conspiracy and Scheme to Defraud 13. From in or about the month of August 2006 until in or about the month of March 2007, in the State and District of Maryland and elsewhere, OTIS RAY HOPE, and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE, the defendants herein, did unlawfully, knowingly and willingly conspire, combine, confederate and agree with each other to knowingly execute, and attempt to execute, a scheme and artifice to defraud a financial institution, to wit, the Bank of America, and to obtain moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by or under the custody and control of the Bank of America, by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1344 ( the scheme to defraud ). 4

Objects of the Conspiracy and Scheme to Defraud 14. The objects of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud were to defraud the Bank of America by making material, false and fraudulent representations concerning the nature and scope of Shiloh Company s business activities, the physical condition of the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center, the value of the company s assets and monthly cash flow, and the overall financial state of the company, in order that: (a) the Bank of America would agree to lend sufficient funds to the Shiloh Company so it could pay off the existing mortgage and outstanding fees that were owed to Sovereign Bank; and (b) the refinancing of the Shiloh Company s mortgage would cause the release of the escrow funds being held by Sovereign Bank. Manner and Means of the Conspiracy and Scheme to Defraud 15. It was part of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud that OTIS RAY HOPE, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE and others at their direction falsely represented to the Bank of America that the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center had reopened for business after the June 2006 fire. 16. It was part of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud that OTIS RAY HOPE, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE and others at their direction supplied false and fraudulent financial statements to the Bank of America which overstated the company s assets and monthly cash flow for the period of June 2006 to December 2006. 17. It was part of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud that OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE submitted to the Bank of America an accountant s compilation report of corporate financial records, which report had been altered to mislead the bank into 5

believing that an accountant had compiled the company s financial records for the period of April 2006 to December 2006 when, in truth and fact, the accountant had not. 18. It was part of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud that OTIS RAY HOPE, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE and others at their direction supplied false and fraudulent information to the Bank of America about the extent of the renovations at the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center. 19. It was part of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud that OTIS RAY HOPE, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE and others at their direction submitted to the Bank of America a bogus corporate resolution and fraudulent minutes of corporate meetings that never took place in order to give the impression that the Board of Directors and trustees of the Shiloh Company had voted to authorize the application for the loan and to permit Richard Wayne Hope to act on behalf of the company during the application process and at settlement. Overt Acts In furtherance of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud, and to effect the objects thereof, the defendants committed the following overt acts in the State and District of Maryland and elsewhere: 20. On or about October 9, 2006, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE sent an email to a mortgage broker with the initials J.B. stating that RICHARD WAYNE HOPE and OTIS RAY HOPE were unhappy with the service provided by Sovereign Bank; all the building renovations and environmental issues had been completed and, consequently, retreats at the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center had restarted about a month earlier; and the defendants wanted to refinance the mortgage and get the money that Sovereign Bank had been holding in escrow. 6

21. On or about October 20, 2006, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE sent an email to J.B. stating that OTIS RAY HOPE was in touch with an accountant who would be providing the Bank of America with the financial statements for the Shiloh Company. 22. On or about December 4, 2006, OTIS RAY HOPE opened a bank account in the name of the Kabel Company, LLC, for which he was the only signatory. 23. On or about December 11, 2006, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE provided the Bank of America with a Statement of Income and Retained Earnings and a Balance Sheet for the first eleven months of 2006, which falsely reflected that the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center had been open for business and had received rental income during some of the months following the fire on June 21, 2006. 24. On or about December 11, 2006, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE provided the Bank of America with an altered compilation report of corporate financial records from a certified public accountant with the initials C.J.C., which falsely asserted that the accountant had compiled the Statement of Income and Retained Earnings and the Balance Sheet for the period ending on November 30, 2006. 25. On or about January 18, 2007, OTIS RAY HOPE signed a loan commitment check from the bank account of the Kabel Company, LLC, made payable to the Bank of America in the amount of $9,000. 26. On or about January 19, 2007, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE hand-delivered the $9,000 loan commitment check to a loan officer for the Bank of America and signed the bank s Commitment Letter. 27. On or about January 19, 2007, during a site tour of the Shiloh Conference and Retreat Center, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE told representatives of the Bank of America that the lack of activity within the building on that particular day was due to the fact that January was not 7

a busy month for conferences and retreats and the lack of heat in the building was just a costsaving measure. 28. On or about February 6, 2007, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE provided the Bank of America with fraudulent corporate Meeting Minutes for the Shiloh Company that purported to summarize two meetings of the company s trustees on January 15, 2007 and February 1, 2007, which meetings, in fact, never occurred. 29. On or about February 26, 2007, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE provided the Bank of America with a corporate Resolution Authorizing the Borrowing of Money on behalf of the Shiloh Company. The Resolution, which bore the forged signature of the purported Secretary, falsely stated, among other things, that there had been a meeting of the Board of Directors on that same date for the purpose of voting on the Resolution. 30. On or about February 28, 2007, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE attended the loan closing and signed the settlement statement, which accounted for the $1.75 million in funds from the Bank of America and a total credit of $108,835 from the Sovereign Bank escrow accounts. 18 U.S.C. 1349 8

COUNT TWO (Bank Fraud) And the Grand Jury for the District of Maryland further charges that: 1. Paragraphs 1 through 12 and 14 through 19 of Count One are hereby realleged and incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth in this Count of the Indictment. 2. From in or about December 2006 until in or about February 2007, in the State and District of Maryland and elsewhere, the defendants, OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE, knowingly and willfully executed and attempted to execute the scheme and artifice to defraud the Bank of America and to obtain moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, and other property under the custody and control of the Bank of America by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses and representations, as set forth in paragraphs 1 through 12 and 14 through 19 of Count One, in that they supplied and caused to be supplied to the Bank of America the following: (a) financial statements for the Shiloh Company for the first eleven months of 2006 and an accountant s compilation report for the same period, which both contained false and fraudulent representations about the company s income and assets, and (b) minutes of meetings of the trustees of the Shiloh Company, which purportedly took place on January 15, 2007 and February 1, 2007, and a corporate resolution, which both contained false and fraudulent representations about the business activities and the financial state of the Shiloh Company and its ability and authority to apply for and repay the loan extended by the Bank of America. 18 U.S.C. 1344 18 U.S.C. 2 9

FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS 1. As a result of the offenses set forth in Counts One and Two, the defendants, OTIS RAY HOPE and RICHARD WAYNE HOPE, shall forfeit to the United States all property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of those offenses, and all property traceable to such property, including but not limited to $1,750,000 and all interest and proceeds traceable thereto. SUBSTITUTE ASSETS 2. If any of the property described in paragraph 1 above as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants, a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; d. has been substantially diminished in value; or e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code Section 853(p) to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of the property charged with forfeiture in paragraph 1. Fed.R.Cr.P 32.2(a) 18 U.S.C. 982(a)(1) & (a)(2)(a) 21 U.S.C. 853 A TRUE BILL: Foreperson Date: Rod J. Rosenstein United States Attorney for the District of Maryland 10