ANNEX. to the Commission decision on the reimbursement of personnel costs of beneficiaries of the Connecting Europe Facility

Similar documents
MODEL ANNEX 2 FOR H2020 GENERAL MGA MULTI ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR THE ACTION. Total costs subcontracting. [F.2 Costs of ] 5

Questions and Answers. Fund Accounting and Support Services RFP

Capital and Risk Management Report 2016

PCT WO 2005/ A3

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

Briefing Note. Fiscal transparency in Pakistan: rapid improvement in two provinces

Official Journal of the European Union

(Text with EEA relevance)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Official Journal of the European Union L 143/49

DECISIONS. (Text with EEA relevance)

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 18

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

GW, KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). (74) Agents: GARDNER, Jason D. et al; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Suite 1400, 4208 Six Forks Road, F G.

Official Journal of the European Union

L 263/20 Official Journal of the European Union

Prerequisites for a Social Security Agreement (SSA) Stephan Cueni Head of International Agreements

Country Classification System

Scopes *only applicable for Hapag-Lloyd called ports Valid to: Until further notice

Motion Federal Credit Union

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

The Role of Regulations and Networks in Firms Offshoring Decisions. Work in Progress

MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

COMMISSION DECISION. of

For further information, please see online or contact

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 20

Protecting the EU budget through the statistical detection of anomalies in international trade data

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 13

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 22 FROM TO LOCALITIES

Part C. Impact on sample design

Uncovering Offshore Financial Centers: Conduits and Sinks in the Global Corporate Ownership Network

DESIGNATION SUBSEQUENT TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION. For use by the holder/office Holder s reference: Office s reference:

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 16

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 14. FROM TO LOCALITIES None

ISCC General Assembly ISCC State of Affairs One Year after Take Off. Brussels, February 8, Supported by:

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 16 FROM TO LOCALITIES

EU Budget 2009: billion. implemented. 4. The European Union as a global player; ; 6.95% 5. Administration ; 6.

Contents. 1 Outline of the WTM system Introduction System design Methodological issues 4. 2 Country classification 9

REQUEST FOR THE RECORDING OF A LIMITATION OF THE LIST OF GOODS AND SERVICES. Office s reference:

MM, EFES EN. Marc Mathieu

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 12 FROM TO LOCALITIES , 999

Adverse scenario for the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority s EU-wide insurance stress test in 2018

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 18 FROM TO LOCALITIES 106 N/C 999

ANNUAL ECONOMIC SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 2008

L 303/40 Official Journal of the European Union

Security Research. FP7-ICT-SEC Joint Call (ENTR + INFSO) on Critical Infrastructure Protection. Seventh Framework Programme

ANNUAL ECONOMIC SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 2008

State of play of CAP measure Setting up of Young Farmers in the European Union

A new approach to education PPPs in the Eurostat/OECD exercise

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

The growing footprint of EME banks in the international banking system 1

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT

Panel on Family Social and Government Policies World Congress of Families VI Madrid, Spain, 25 May 2012

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 17

Annex I Data definitions and sources

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 21 FROM TO LOCALITIES , 999

Growth, competitiveness and jobs: priorities for the European Semester 2013 Presentation of J.M. Barroso,

H2020-Galileo Call evaluation outcome

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: FROM TO LOCALITIES N/C N/C

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 13 FROM TO LOCALITIES

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

The European SME Instrument

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 12

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 15 FROM TO LOCALITIES

CODES FOR PHARMACY ONLINE CLAIMS PROCESSING

EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SPENDING IN SUPPORT OF R&D ACTIVITIES

ADVANCED SEARCH GUIDE: Supported fields and operators for Boolean searching in Cipher

Facilitating youth access to finance: Opportunities provided by financial instruments. Dr Nivelin NOEV EC / DG AGRI F.3

HOW RECESSION REFLECTS IN THE LABOUR MARKET INDICATORS

SME Instrument. Gregor Novak Project Advisor / Dep. A / Unit A.2 09/11/2016

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET No 6 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2018

in focus Statistics Trade in high-tech products Contents China on the rise The EU is the leading trader in high-tech products in 2005

Making Finance Work for Africa: The Collateral Debate. World Bank FPD Forum April 2007

EBA REPORT ON HIGH EARNERS

La partecipazione italiana alle azioni Marie Curie

Neoclassicism in the Balkans

Item 3.2 COMPLIANCE MONITORING

Welcome to the SCOAP 3 Forum!

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 16

China passes the EU in High-tech exports

Lessons from Past Emerging Markets Cycles: Part II (Bonds)

The entitlement to and use of sickness benefits by persons residing in a Member State other than the competent Member State

RETIREMENT Differences in State of Affairs and legacies across the EU28

EU Budget for the future New legislative package for cohesion policy #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion

On 19/06/2012 the Court delivered its ruling in Case C-307/10 IP Translator, giving the following answers to the referred questions:

FOCUS AREA 5B: Energy efficiency

Costs of exporting: evidence from Russia

World IPv6 Trends. George Michaelson APNIC

COMMISSION DECISION. of

Working Group Social Protection

Reform strategies: the experience of emerging European economies and their effects on sustainability and equity

Page 1 of 9 SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDICES: Locality Loccode CCOD From To Barbados BB001 BB

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 14

FOCUS AREA 6C: Access to and quality of ICT

DATA SET ON INVESTMENT FUNDS (IVF) Naming Conventions

Axis 4 (Leader) Implementing Local Development Strategies

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Capital and Risk Management Report 2016

SECTION A APPENDIX J - COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES: Page 1 of 14 FROM TO LOCALITIES

European Innovation Policy. an Economic perspective

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 3.2.2016 C(2016) 478 final ANNEX 1 ANNEX to the Commission decision on the reimbursement of personnel costs of beneficiaries of the Connecting Europe Facility [ ] EN EN

ANNEX to the Commission decision on the reimbursement of personnel costs of beneficiaries of the Connecting Europe Facility [ ] Introduction In order to simplify the declaration and verification of costs of beneficiaries under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) programme, this decision authorises the reimbursement of personnel costs declared as unit costs on the basis of beneficiaries' usual accounting practices and the reimbursement of personnel costs of SME owners who do not receive a salary declared as unit costs. It further lays down methods to determine annual productive hours and hourly rates. 1. Rationale for the reimbursement of personnel costs declared as unit costs (1) Experience from the TEN-T Programme Based on experience drawn from the implementation of the TEN-T Programme, the use of unit costs would facilitate the implementation of the CEF programme for the following reasons: - Majority of beneficiaries have long established systems for the use of unit costs declared on the basis of the beneficiary s usual cost accounting practices for direct personnel costs; - Direct personnel costs are typically a minor cost component of actions co-funded under the CEF. However, the admistrative effort required to report (and verify) actual personnel costs is disproportionately high; - Use of unit costs will bring a simplification and reduce administrative burden for all concerned parties, the beneficiaries, Member States and the Commission/ INEA. (2) The specific case of SME owners who do not receive a salary SMEs are expected to participate in actions funded under the CEF. It should thus be possible to provide support for the work carried out by SME owners who do not receive a salary. However, in the absence of a salary, there is no actual cost recorded in the accounts of the beneficiary related to the work of these persons. This leads to the EU being incapable of cofinancing such work which is otherwise real and necessary for the implementation of an action. The use of unit costs to support SME owners who do not receive a salary carried out in EU funded actions in accordance with Article 124(5) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 966/2012 would allow overcoming this difficulty. EN 2 EN

Therefore, costs related to the work of SME owners who do not receive a salary shall be declared on the basis of unit costs in grants awarded under the CEF programme taking the form of reimbursement of eligible costs. 'Innovation' related actions are addressed under both CEF and the H2020 programmes, which attract the same population of beneficiaries. For the sake of consistency and administrative simplification for the beneficiaries, the same rules should be applied to the same beneficiaries which may receive funding under both programmes. (3) Reduction of risk The use of unit costs will reduce the risk of irregularities, overstatements and fraud since personnel costs will be calculated according to established formulas set out in point 2. In addition, it will also contribute to the objective of simplification and cost-effectiveness of controls. 2. Methods to determine and update the amounts 2.1. Unit costs determined according to the beneficiary's usual cost accounting practices Beneficiaries may declare eligible costs for the work carried out under the action for all categories of personnel, other than SME owners and natural persons not receiving a salary, using unit costs determined according to the beneficiary's usual cost accounting practices using annual productive hours. Eligible staff costs shall be calculated according to the following steps: STEP 1: Determine actual annual personnel costs for the year, as recorded in the beneficiary's accounts, excluding ineligible costs, costs included in other budget categories, and costs covered by other forms of grant (where applicable), in particular any indirect costs and provisions. "Personnel" means staff working under an employment contract (or equivalent appointing act) assigned to the action, under the conditions set in the grant agreement. The personnel costs must be limited to salaries (including during parental leave), social security contributions, taxes and other costs included in the remuneration, if they arise from national law or the employment contract (or equivalent appointing act). Personnel costs may also cover additional remuneration of personnel, the costs for natural persons working under a direct contract and the costs of personnel seconded by a third party against payment. Calculating the actual annual personnel costs must be done according to the participant's usual cost accounting practices, provided that they comply with the following cumulative criteria: a) they are calculated on the basis of the total actual personnel costs recorded in the participant's general accounts for the personnel carrying out work for the action; this may be adjusted by the beneficiary on the basis of budgeted or estimated elements; b) the cost accounting practices are applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria independent from the source of funding; EN 3 EN

c) they ensure compliance with the non-profit requirement and the avoidance of double funding of costs. Among the boundary conditions to be applied, beneficiaries must ensure that the costs declared can be directly reconciled with the amounts recorded in their general accounts. STEP 2: Determine a person's 'annual productive hours', for which beneficiaries may choose among 3 options: (a) On the condition that either the contract of employment, or the applicable collective labour agreement, or the national working time legislation allow to determine the annual workable hours, the total number of hours worked by the person in the year for the beneficiary calculated as follows: Annual productive hours = {annual workable hours of the person } plus {overtime worked} minus {absences} annual workable hours means the period during which the personnel must be working at the employer s disposal and carrying out his/her activity or duties under the employment contract, applicable collective labour agreement or national working time legislation; absences means for example trainings, sick leave and special leave. (b) The standard number of annual hours generally applied by the beneficiary for its personnel in accordance with its usual cost accounting practices. This number must be at least 90% of the standard annual workable hours. If there is no applicable reference (i.e. employment contract, collective labour agreement or national law) for the standard annual workable hours, this option cannot be used. (c) 1 720 hours for persons working full time (or corresponding pro-rata for persons not working full time). For all options under (a), (b) and (c), the actual time spent on parental leave by a person assigned to the co-funded action may be deducted from the number of annual productive hours. The total number of hours declared in EU or Euratom grants, for a person for a year, cannot be higher than the annual productive hours used for the calculations of the hourly rate. Therefore, the maximum number of hours that can be declared for the grant are: {number of annual productive hours for the year minus total number of hours declared by the beneficiary, for that person for that year, for other EU or Euratom grants}. STEP 3: Determine the hourly rate for a person (the 'unit cost') as follows: actual annual personnel costs for the person for the year divided by EN 4 EN

number of annual productive hours. The beneficiaries must use the annual personnel costs and the number of annual productive hours for each financial year covered by the reporting period concerned. If a financial year is not closed at the end of the reporting period, the beneficiaries must use the hourly rate of the last closed financial year available. STEP 4: Multiply the hourly rate (the 'unit cost') with the number of actual hours worked on the action. The number of actual working hours declared for a person must be identifiable and verifiable; they must be necessary for implementing the action and must be actually used during the action. Evidence regarding the actual hours worked shall be provided by the participant, through a time recording system for which the minimum requirements are set out in section 2.3. 2.2. Unit costs for SME Owners and natural persons not receiving a salary The direct personnel costs of SMEs owners not receiving a salary shall be based on a unit cost per hour worked on the action to be calculated as follows: {Monthly living allowance fixed at EUR 4 650 multiplied by the country-specific correction coefficient as set out in the Appendix} divided by 143 hours The value of the work of the SME owners not receiving a salary shall be determined by multiplying the unit cost by the number of actual hours worked on the Action. The standard number of annual productive hours per SME owner is equal to 1 720 hours. The total number of hours declared, in a year, in EU and Euratom grants for one SME owner not receiving a salary may not be higher than the standard number of annual productive hours (1 720 hours). 2.3. Time records The time recording system should record all working time including absences and may be paper or electronically based. The time records must be approved by the persons working on the action and their supervisors, at least monthly. The absence of an adequate time recording system is considered to be a serious and systematic weakness of internal control. As an exception, for persons working exclusively on the co-funded action, there is no need to keep time records, if the beneficiary signs a declaration confirming that the persons concerned have worked exclusively on the action, or it is clearly indicated in their contract of employment (or equivalent appointing act). 3. No-profit and co-financing principles and absence of double financing The conditions for reasonably ensuring that the no-profit principle is complied with are: The calculation method of unit costs is based on the actual costs recorded on an annual basis in the beneficiary's accounts; EN 5 EN

The unit cost covers only a part of the eligible costs; The absence of profit will be verified at the time of payment of the balance according to the conditions stated in each grant agreement. The conditions for reasonably ensuring the absence of double funding are: The specification/identification of the categories of eligible costs subject to the unit cost; Ex-Ante and Ex-Post controls may verify the declaration of hours / units across several funded actions in order to ensure there is no abuse of the number of hours for individuals declared in a given action. Compliance with the co-financing principle will be ensured by application of a co-financing rate laid down in each grant agreement to the amount of the eligible costs. Verification of compliance with the above principles for the funding on the basis of unit costs of the work carried out by SME owners not receiving a salary is limited, since the value of their work are not personnel costs borne by the beneficiaries. This exception is foreseen by Article 124(5) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 966/2012. EN 6 EN

APPENDIX: Country correction coefficient EN 7 EN

MT 89.6% AM 89.9% CR 76.7% Country Code 1 CCC NL 104.3% AO 114.6% CU 83.8% AT 104.8% PL 76.4% AR 58.5% CV 76.4% BE 100.0% PT 89.1% AU 105.0% DJ 93.4% BG 71.5% RO 68.3% AZ 93.0% DO 66.9% CY 91.8% SE 111.7% BB 116.6% DZ 81.7% CZ 83.8% SI 86.1% BD 47.2% EC 68.8% DE 98.8% SK 82.6% BF 93.8% EG 48.6% DK 135.3% UK 120.3% BJ 92.6% ER 61.2% EE 78.3% BM 151.5% ET 85.2% EL 92.7% AL 76.1% BO 51.3% FJ 68.1% ES 97.6% BA 73.6% BR 92.0% GA 113.1% FI 116.6% CH 113.1% BW 55.3% GE 89.5% FR 111.0% FO 134.1% BY 65.0% GH 68.2% HR 97.5% IL 108.7% BZ 75.3% GM 67.7% HU 76.2% IS 116.6% CA 86.4% GN 60.4% IE 113.5% LI 110.0% CD 127.6% GT 78.8% IT 106.7% MD 61.1% CF 114.3% GW 102.7% LT 73.1% ME 66.9% CG 124.9% GY 58.9% LU 100.0% MK 68.4% CI 102.0% HK 93.8% LV 75.9% NO 131.9% CL 67.1% HN 69.0% 1 ISO 3166 alpha-2, except for Greece and the United Kingdom (EL and UK used respectively instead of GR and GB). RS 67.1% TR 86.6% CM 103.3% CN 85.0% CO 76.6% HT 108.7% ID 75.3% IN 52.8% EN 8 EN

JM 94.9% NC 128.9% SZ 56.8% ZW 47.2% JO 75.5% NE 87.9% TD 125.3% JP 115.9% NG 92.4% TG 88.7% KE 78.1% NI 57.3% TH 65.0% KG 83.1% NP 73.5% TJ 64.9% KH 70.5% NZ 94.1% TL 78.3% KR 105.2% PA 57.0% TN 70.5% KZ 100.2% PE 75.5% TO 85.0% LA 77.7% PG 83.0% TT 74.1% LB 86.4% PH 65.8% TW 83.6% LK 61.6% PK 49.4% TZ 65.2% LR 100.1% PS 100.4% UA 92.3% LS 56.7% PY 71.9% UG 65.7% LY 60.0% RU 115.5% US 99.4% MA 83.5% RW 87.3% UY 75.3% MG 80.0% SA 84.8% UZ 51.4% ML 90.4% SB 93.3% VE 70.0% MR 64.5% SD 65.1% VN 51.1% MU 72.7% SG 102.5% VU 112.6% MW 76.0% SL 85.2% WS 75.8% MX 70.4% SN 86.2% XK 58.6% MY 71.6% SR 50.6% YE 68.1% MZ 71.6% SV 74.3% ZA 55.8% NA 68.3% SY 74.8% ZM 66.4% EN 9 EN