ON: Negotiating Objectives for a U.S.-European Union Trade Agreement. TO: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. BY: U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Similar documents
RE: American Chemistry Council Public Comments on U.S. Objectives for U.S.-UK Trade Negotiations

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

2019 USCIB Trade and Investment Agenda

Comments in Response to Executive Order Regarding Trade Agreements Violations and Abuses Docket No. USTR

Statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the U.S.-Japan Business Council

November 26, Re: USTR ; Request for Comments on Negotiating Objectives for a U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement

Summary of negotiating objectives

USCIB Comments on Negotiating Objectives Regarding U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement December 19, 2018

ENHANCING TRADE AND INVESTMENT, SUPPORTING JOBS, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: OUTLINES OF THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

Multi-Industry Association Recommendations on the China Section 301 Tariff Product Exclusion Process

ON: Principles for Ensuring Retirement Advice Serves the Best Interest of Working Families and Retirees

Statement of the. U.S. Chamber of Commerce

NOTE FOR THE TPC/INTA EU-US Relations: Interim Report on the work of the Executive Working Group 30 January 2019

Public Comments. National Association of Manufacturers Washington, DC. Before the United States Trade Representative

Trade Policy. U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Plan

Trade in New England. Export-Supported U.S. Jobs (2014) Merchandise Exports (2015)

Trade Policy. U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Plan

overview FACT SHEET trans-pacific partnership TPP

Chapter 2 Development of rules, including trade agreements

RE: Request for comments concerning free trade agreement with Colombia (Docket No. USTR )

India s Trade Policy and Global Trade Initiatives

Pre-Hearing Statement of Linda M. Dempsey, Vice President, International Economic Affairs, National Association of Manufacturers

CONSULTATION ON TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE UNITED STATES

Submission of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the U.S.-Japan Business Council

This page features information, deadlines and resource documents on the various U.S. tariff actions and the responses by the rest of the world.

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) TTIP explained

Stabilizing Premiums and Helping Individuals in the Individual Insurance Market for 2018: Governors

June 12, To: Members of the California Congressional Delegation. From: (Mrs.) Susanne Stirling, Vice President-International Affairs

Re: Consulting Canadians on a possible Canada-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

SINGAPORE AND COSTA RICA SIGN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

USCIB Trade and Investment Agenda 2018

ON: The Department of Labor s Proposed Fiduciary Rule. TO: Subcommittee on Oversight of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means

Transatlantic Financial Regulatory Coherence Coalition: Financial Regulation in the TTIP

Re: Request for Comments on Negotiating Objectives for a U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on International Trade WORKING DOCUMENT

Increasing Productivity and Competitiveness through Trade (EU-Japan FTA/EPA, TPP) June 2014 Jun ARIMA Director General, JETRO London

Canada Gazette, 12 April 2003; volume 137, no. 15

USCIB Comments on Negotiating Objectives Regarding U.S.-EU Trade Agreement Docket Number: USTR December 10, 2018

National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones National Press Building th Street NW, Suite 1071 Washington, DC

ON: Legislative Proposals to Enhance Capital Formation and Reduce Regulatory Burdens, Part II. TO: House Committee on Financial Services

Renegotiating NAFTA: Impact on the U.S. Auto Care Industry

AmCham EU position on Customs & Trade Facilitation in TTIP

A new EU trade agreement with Japan

Comments to the Draft Resolution on TTIP negotiations

SUBMISSION TO THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE PROPOSED NEW ZEALAND/EUROPEAN UNION FREE TRADE AGREEMENT FEBRUARY 2016

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

BUILDING THE FUTURE A LOOK AT THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF EAST AFRICA

Brexit: Deal or No Deal. Written Testimony for the UK House of Lords EU Select Committee Inquiry

and Ensuing Retaliatory Measures from other Countries Note: Views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter

April 18, Overview of a New Transatlantic Partnership Vision

TOOL #26. EXTERNAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT

Testimony. of Linda Dempsey Vice President, International Economic Affairs National Association of Manufacturers

Statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce

BUDGET Pre-budget consultation submission

How CETA Will Benefit the

BRIEFING ON The TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (TPPA)

The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)

Open for business: The European Union's relations with Mexico in a changing world

FAQ on the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership ( TTIP') Contents

TPP11 Agreement in Principle: Japan s Role in Mega-regional Trade Agreements

Updating NAFTA: Implications of the Trans-Pacific and Trans-Atlantic Partnerships

OBSTACLES TO TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INVESTMENT

Canadian American Business Council (CABC) Pre-Budget 2016 Submission

Comparison of the UK Government, European Council and European Parliament s positions on future UK-EU relations (5 June 2018)

CONTENTS. Topic At A Glance A free trade area with the EU: what does it mean for Georgia? 4

STANDARDS AND TRADE. Eileen Hill Team Leader for Standards International Trade Administration U.S. Department of Commerce

Country note on Trade and Investment Policy Coordination Country: Indonesia

Emeritus Professor Dr Zakariah Abdul Rashid. Executive Director Malaysian Institute of Economic Research

International Trade Bulletin

WRITTEN SUBMISSON OF THE NATIONAL FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL

The US China trade dispute: phase two

Addressing Trade Restrictive Non Tariff Measures on Goods Trade in the East African Community

OVERLOOKED FACTS ABOUT

Outlook for Changes in Maritime and Trade Policy Under the Trump Administration

The voice of the energy industry. Brexit & the future EU-UK energy relationship

United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality

Re: Proposed Determination of Action Pursuant to Section 301 Docket No. USTR

The TransPacific Partnership (TPP) is a regional trade agreement being negotiated

INSIDE KORUS FTA - A Five-year Achievement -

EU Trade Policy and CETA

Trans-Pacific Partnership

FAQ REGULATORY COOPERATION, HARMONIZATION AND GOOD REGULATORY PRACTICES IN USMCA

THE ALUMINUM PERSPECTIVE: U.S. MARKET & TRADE POLICIES

International Trade Update

Comparing Dispute Settlement Systems: NAFTA and WTO. CREP Workshop 13 September 2005 Junji Nakagawa (ISS)

The CSC is Canada s leading voice in promoting the importance of services to the Canadian economy. We have two core mandates:

Our position. Towards a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Indonesia

10 Commitments China made when it joined the WTO and has not respected

U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. International Affairs

23 March U.S. plans to impose tariffs on Chinese imports, raising trade war fear

The Coalition s Policy for Trade

Services Trade: Essential Fuel for U.S. and Global Economic Growth

Submission to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance. Priorities for the 2015 Federal Budget

The new EU Japan EPA: How can your company leverage on improved trade cooperation and market access?

Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) Services and Investment Unit, Trade Negotiations Division Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade

EFTA FREE TRADE RELATIONS

GLOBAL LOGISTICS & THE US TRADE DEFICIT

Consumers at the heart of Trade Policy

September 6, The Honorable Robert Lighthizer United States Trade Representative th Street NW Washington, DC 20508

Transcription:

ON: Negotiating Objectives for a U.S.-European Union Trade Agreement TO: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative BY: U.S. Chamber of Commerce DATE: December 14, 2018 1615 H Street NW Washington, DC 20062 The Chamber s mission is to advance human progress through an economic, political and social system based on individual freedom, incentive, initiative, opportunity and responsibility.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is the world s largest business federation representing the interests of more than three million businesses of all sizes, sectors, and regions, as well as state and local chambers and industry associations. The Chamber is dedicated to promoting, protecting, and defending America s free enterprise system. More than 96% of Chamber member companies have fewer than 100 employees, and many of the nation s largest companies are also active members. We are therefore cognizant not only of the challenges facing smaller businesses, but also those facing the business community at large. Besides representing a cross-section of the American business community with respect to the number of employees, major classifications of American business e.g., manufacturing, retailing, services, construction, wholesalers, and finance are represented. The Chamber has membership in all 50 states. The Chamber s international reach is substantial as well. In addition to 117 American Chambers of Commerce abroad, an increasing number of our members engage in the export and import of both goods and services and have ongoing investment activities. The Chamber favors strengthened international competitiveness and opposes artificial U.S. and foreign barriers to international business. 2

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce appreciates the opportunity to present the following testimony in response to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative s Federal Register Notice entitled Negotiating Objectives for a U.S. European Union Trade Agreement. The U.S. business community is encouraged that the U.S. and the European Union (EU) have returned to the negotiating table and are committed to securing tangible improvements in the transatlantic commercial relationship. In recent years, the EU has negotiated major new market opening agreements with a number of countries. Indeed, just this week the European Parliament ratified an agreement between the EU and Japan, a deal that is expected to enter into force early next year. It is vital that the U.S. pursue a robust and positive trade agenda, and these negotiations with the EU present an important opportunity to do just that. We cannot afford to fall further behind in securing closer commercial ties with our allies and major trading partners. In keeping with the Chamber s mission to advocate for free enterprise, competitive markets, and rules-based trade and investment, one of the Chamber s primary objectives in these negotiations will be to pursue measures that remove and do not raise barriers to trade. To ensure this, we recommend hewing closely to the negotiating objectives established in the Trade Promotion Authority law. There are a range of near term opportunities for forward momentum in the transatlantic economic relationship. Taken collectively, these measures would provide a significant boost to the U.S. economy and strengthen our partnership with Europe at a time when joint leadership is essential. Among the near term opportunities, the two sides should strive to: Remove expeditiously the U.S. Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from the EU and the corresponding EU retaliatory measures. 3

Avoid imposition of new Section 232 tariffs on imported autos or auto parts. Eliminate all tariffs on non-auto industrial goods, as agreed in the presidential joint statement in July. Eliminate or significantly streamline licensing requirements for U.S. LNG exports to non-fta partner countries such as the EU. Resolve longstanding market access issues, such as increasing EU imports of non-hormone treated beef from the U.S. Agree to maintain existing market access levels for services, and establish a framework for cooperation towards elimination of services trade restrictions in third countries. Launch a dialogue on standards and conformity assessment that includes active stakeholder engagement. Our written submission identifies additional opportunities for near term advances in several sectors, including automobiles, energy, medical devices, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, agriculture and biotechnology, and services - including financial services and express delivery. There are also clearly several long-standing barriers to transatlantic trade and investment whose elimination would significantly boost the longterm economic outlook on both sides of the Atlantic. Greater cooperation in these areas would also provide a pathway for joint leadership in response to shared challenges in a rapidly changing global economy. As a result of this U.S.-EU dialogue, the two sides should: Cooperate to protect companies and workers from non-market oriented policies and practices by third countries. Work together to strengthen global trade rules and institutions, including via ongoing U.S.-EU-Japan trilateral talks. Promote binding commitments to increase services market access, including for new services. Address non-science-based restrictions on agricultural trade in a transparent and timely fashion. 4

Establish new rules to protect trade secrets, eliminate forced technology transfers, and reduce barriers to foreign direct investment. Ensure the highest standards of intellectual property protection across all industries to enhance leadership in innovative industries. Create new meaningful regulatory cooperation dialogues. Formalize a joint commitment to follow good regulatory practices. Pursue new sectoral agreements that minimize duplicative testing and certification requirements. Promote effective regulatory cooperation to jointly address emerging technologies and prevent unnecessary regulatory divergences Prevent restrictions on the free flow of data. As we begin these new negotiations, the business community has looked to recent agreements including the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) for signals of where USTR will seek to take these negotiations. Our reactions are mixed. On the one hand, USMCA included very strong provisions in a number of rules chapters, some of which surpass the quality achieved in any earlier U.S. trade agreement. Among the successes are chapters on Digital Trade, Intellectual Property, Financial Services, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Technical Barriers to Trade, Competition Policy, State-Owned Enterprises, Good Regulatory Practices, Telecommunications, and Customs and Trade Facilitation. However, the USMCA fell short in other areas. USMCA outcomes on investment protection, government procurement, de minimis, and Canada s cultural exemption are disappointing and must not be viewed as precedents for future trade agreements. Other USMCA elements of concern are those that appear to be managed trade measures that limit trade and may violate the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Safeguards. 5

The Chamber encourages the U.S. and the EU to negotiate in good faith to expand our trade and investment relationship. We are each other s largest trade and investment partners, and approximately 15 million highpaying jobs rely on that trade and investment today. There are multiple opportunities to deepen and expand our economic ties, and to collaborate to address common challenges in the world economy. By contrast, raising new barriers between the U.S. and EU would be counterproductive and undercut growth in both economies. We welcome the opportunity to continue to provide input and work with you as these negotiations progress. 6