ITE TRIP GENERATION AND BEYOND

Similar documents
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Methodology

System Development Charge Methodology

sources for FY , only a portion of the statedistributed revenue would be available for new capital projects.

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

ARTICLE 8.6 PROPORTIONATE FAIR-SHARE PROGRAM [Enacted by Ord /5/06]

PLEASANT GROVE, UTAH TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN AND ANALYSIS

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

Capital Improvements

CUSTOMS PROCEDURES, TRADE SYSTEM,

RE: Takoma Junction SHARED PARKING STUDY Takoma Park, Maryland Our Job No.:

GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY

VOLUSIA COUNTY COUNCIL IMPACT FEE DISCUSSION

Fully Utilized Transportation Funding Sources

Rates Effective 1/1/2018 Water Residential and Commercial Charges CPI not applicable to base and consumption rates for Rates Effective 1/1/2017

CHAPTER 3: GROWTH OF THE REGION

North Fair Oaks Zoning Workgroup Fair Oaks Community Center February 15, 2017

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PORT HUENEME FILMING AND STILL PHOTOGRAPHY PERMITS

Okaloosa-Walton 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Amendment

Options Mastery Day 1 System Training

Committed to Service

Also Present: Malcolm O Hara, Attorney for the Town and Joe Patricke, Building Inspector.

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RTC) REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (RRIF) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Meeting Minutes Thursday, August 28, 2014

2012 Road Program. County Council Workshop July 21, 2011 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. We must manage our road assets.

Pasco County, Florida. Multi-Modal Mobility Fee 2018 Update Study

Draft-Fiscal Impact Analysis of Union Square and Boynton Yards

TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MAY 7, 2013

95 Express Dynamic Pricing

2. When Jenny was a kid,

IT WAS MOVED (DENNIS) AND SECONDED (MARK) TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 14, 2014 MEETING, AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

OKEECHOBEE COUNTY ROAD STRIPING AND MARKING SERVICES

Impact Fee Trends. Growth & Infrastructure Consortium, Atlanta. Clancy Mullen

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

Moab City Planning Commission Meeting 217 E. Center Street Thursday, June 14, 2018 WORKSHOP AGENDA 5:30 PM

Presented By: L. Carson Bise II, AICP President

FIRE DEPARTMENT ALTERNATE RESPONSE VEHICLE (ARV) PROGRAM By Deputy Chief Steve Mims

SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAMS. The goals of this rule are as follows:

Zoning Board of Appeals TOWN OF BRUNSWICK 336 Town Office Road Troy, New York 12180

Della Rucker, AICP, CEcD Wise Economy Workshop Doug Walker, Placeways LLC Chris Haller, Urban Interactive Studio

Reassessment New Castle County. R. Douglas Sensabaugh Manager Office of Property Assessment

ST LUCIE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT FIRE PREVENTION CODE. RESOLUTION NO

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION

Tampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG CITY COUNCIL. JULY 11, :00 PM Law Enforcement Center, 1601 E. Main St.

OFFERING MEMORANDUM. Perimeter Road Development Site Miami, Florida

SANFORD PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MEETING September 7, :30 P.M. Town Hall Annex Third Floor Chambers

Hurricane Charley - Executive summary. Hurricane Charley. Nature s Force vs. Structural Strength

June 24, Lely Resort (PUD) Insubstantial Change (PDI) PL Dear Ms. Beasley:

Final Report Water and Sewer Rate Model Town of Denton, MD

FY20 BUDGET TIMETABLE

RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy Adopted June 7, 2012

TRIP GENERATION RATES FOR RETIREMENT HOMES AND VILLAGES IN SOUTH AFRICA

STATE OF MAINE. I. CALL TO ORDER On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. a Council Meeting was held in the City Hall Auditorium.

11/28/2018. Overview. Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. Multiple regression. Multiple regression. Multiple regression. Multiple regression

CITY OF BOCA RATON ACTION AGENDA Update March 31, 2017

University Link LRT Extension

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

Decommissioning Regulatory Process

OPTIONAL DOMESTIC TIME-OF-USE CRITICAL PEAK PRICE + DAILY DEMAND PRICING

Introduced by the Council President at the request of the Joint. Planning Committee & substituted by the Land Use and Zoning Committee:

SYCAMORE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA December 5, 2016

Subdivision Staging Policy (SSP) By Dan Wilhelm, As of 11/15/2016

City of Antioch Development Impact Fee Study

ACHD. Transportation Funding

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA REGULAR AGENDA

Business Survey Report

AGENDA ITEM 3 A MINUTES

RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE

August 7 11, Reminder: inside draped spaces are 10 wide and 8 deep; outside spaces are to fit your request.

ITEM 7 ESTIMATED INITIAL INVESTMENT YOUR ESTIMATED INITIAL INVESTMENT. Single Franchise Agreement. New Construction Space. $2,035,000 to $2,117,500

Private Equity Investment in U.S. Banks

8" SOUTHRIDGE STORM SEWER CURB INLET S.RIM= I.E.= " 58 STORM SEWER CURB INLET E.RIM= I.E.= th STREET 8" 18" 30" 60

ORLANDO-ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY Traffic Volumes At Mainline Toll Plazas Existing System

Optimizing the service of the Orange Line

CHAPTER 6: COST ESTIMATES

BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF NAPA COUNTY

8. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Citrus Notes ! 3! !!!! !!! March 2015! Vol ! Inside this Issue: "!

Manor Township, Lancaster County, PA Zoning Permit Application ( section 702) App. number App. date

How did we get here?

Special Conditions, Regulations and Instructions for Right of Way Permit Applications

Economic Impact of the Hotel Roanoke and Conference Center. Prepared by the

Paperless Lending Made Easy Streamling the loan management process

THE LOCAL IMPACT OF HOME BUILDING IN WINNEBAGO COUNTY, WI. Presented by: Elliot F. Eisenberg, Ph.D. December 8, 2010 Oshkosh, WI

Business Statistics: A First Course

Development of the Cost Feasible Plan

COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA ITEM #2.a

General Shafter School District STYLE. General Obligation. Government Financial. for Strategies. Presented by Lori Raineri September 3, 2015

COMMON COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR STATED MEETING NOVEMBER 5, :30 PM. Youth of the Year. Small Business Saturday

Stormwater Management Program

Appendix B Example Project Designs and Engineers Opinion of Costs

Empirical Bayes Analysis For Safety. Larry Hagen, P.E., PTOE

Stormwater Needs Assessment

Section II: Overview of the Annual Growth Policy 1. Background

P.O. Box 1766 Binghamton, New York (607) April 27 th, 2006 Meeting Minutes

TOWNSHIP OF LOWER IF YOU FIND COMPLETION OF THE APPLICATION DIFFICULT, WE SUGGEST THAT YOU OBTAIN LEGAL COUNSEL.

October 3, 2017 Redwood City, CA Regular Meeting Ph: :00 p.m. Accessible to Disabled

Planning Commission Work Meeting Minutes Thursday, August 4, 2016 City Council Chambers 220 East Morris Avenue Time 6:30 p.m.

Sidewalk Cafés. Who is the Sidewalk Café Permit issued to and where can it be used?

PETER STUTO, CHAIRMAN KATHY DALTON LOU MION TIMOTHY LANE KAREN GOMEZ ELENA VAIDA, ESQ., Counsel to the Planning Board

CHAPTER 10 FIREWORKS REGULATIONS

Transcription:

ITE TRIP GENERATION AND BEYOND Eric J. Tripi, P.E., PTOE Iteris, Inc. 1156 Bowman Road, Suite 200 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 November 4 th, 2010

Presentation Agenda I. Traffic Engineering II. Basics of ITE Trip Generation III. Presentation #2 - Impact Fee Schedules and ITE Trip Generation Adjustments - Jonathan Young IV. Berkeley County, SC Impact Fee Ordinance V. Two Independent Impact Fee Studies VI. Final Agreement Questions 2

I. Traffic Engineering 3

What Do I Do? Traffic Impact Studies Level of Service Analysis Parking Studies Traffic Signal Design Signal Systems/Timing Optimization Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Data Collection 4

II. Basics of ITE Trip Generation 5

Basics of ITE Trip Generation What is a Trip? A single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination inside a study site. What is Trip Generation? The estimated peak hour and daily site traffic volumes for a particular land use. Source Documents: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2 nd Edition ITE 2004 ITE Trip Generation, 8 th Edition ITE 2008 6

Basics of ITE Trip Generation ITE s Trip Generation Manual Purpose is to compile trip generation data submitted to ITE (contained in two volumes) 1,000 s of studies conducted in US/Canada since the 1960 s Independent Variables (SF, # of Units, Employees, Seats, etc.) Contains Plots / Weighted Averages / Regression Equations Pass-by and Internal Capture trip data 7

Trip Generation Table 8

2010 Growth and Infrastructure Consortium Conference

Trip Generation Table 9

2010 Growth and Infrastructure Consortium Conference 2

Basics of ITE Trip Generation Trip Generation Procedure 10

Basics of ITE Trip Generation Pass-by Trips Trips already on the roadway Not new trips Trip deductions for retail uses Example of a Pass-by Trip: Stopping at the dry cleaners on the way home from work. 11

12 Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition ITE 2004

Internal Capture Trips Trips made within mixed-use developments Trips are on internal roadways only and do not use adjacent main roadways Result in trip reductions for mixed-use developments Example of Internal Capture Trip: Driving/Walking from your office to a restaurant within a large mixed-use development, but via internal roadways only. 13

14 Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition ITE 2004

Internal Capture Trips Notes Existing data based on 1990 s FDOT methodology/research New Florida Community Capture Methodology - 2009 Newly completed research (NCHRP 8-51), results have shown * : ITE Method overestimated traffic NCHRP 8-51 method found to be most accurate, e.g., reduced estimation errors by 1/5 th to 1/3 rd of other methods More data needed * Source: TTI, 2010 ITE Annual Meeting Presentation 15

Basics of ITE Trip Generation Trip Generation Summary Use the data carefully Understand how the data was collected Understand the sites surveyed within each land use Pass-by and Internal Capture Trip Deductions Weighted Averages vs. Regression Equations THESE ARE ESTIMATES! 16

III. Presentation #2 - Impact Fee Schedules and ITE Trip Generation Adjustments - Jonathan Young 17

Thank you Jonathan, now back to Eric. IV. Berkeley County, SC Impact Fee Ordinance 18

Berkeley County, SC Impact Fee Ordinance Berkeley County, SC has an Impact Fee Ordinance Two existing businesses wished to build new facilities in Berkeley County, SC Each owner was assessed an Impact Fee they were not happy about so we were called to assess the situation. 19

Berkeley County, SC Impact Fee Ordinance 20

Berkeley County, SC Impact Fee Ordinance Berkeley County Ordinance Impact Fee Calcs Impact Fee = (NNWT) x (TED) x (COST) x (CDR) Where: NNWT = Net New Weekday Trips (includes pass-by and capture trip reductions) TED = Trip end discount of 50% COST = Cost per trip for Service Zone 1, $402.25 CDR = Per County Council Policy 70% of maximum allowable impact fee will be charged (85% for Independent Studies). 21

Berkeley County, SC Impact Fee Ordinance 22

V. Two Independent Impact Fee Studies 23

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies What kind of land use is this? Sells motorcycles, watercrafts, ATV s, utility vehicles Sells parts Provides on-site service Typically low number of employees (<20) Building space dedicated to showroom, service area, and storage 24

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies SITE #1 Existing Site Characteristics Building 5,000 sf, with additional 1,250 sf of storage outside the building 7 employees Open 10AM-6PM, Mon-Sat Future Site Characteristics 17,000 sf 7 Employees Open 10AM-6PM, Mon-Sat 25

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies SITE #2 Existing Site Characteristics Building 9,950 sf, with additional 15,820 sf of storage outside the building 15 employees Open 9AM-6PM, Mon-Sat Future Site Characteristics 43,559 sf 15 Employees Open 9AM-6PM, Mon-Sat 26

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies Site #1 Assessed $41,700 in impact fees based on existing Berkeley County Ordinance methodologies Site #2 Assessed $126,000 in impact fees 27

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies Impact Fee Calcs for Site #1 (per County Ordinance): 17,000 Square Feet of Future Building Area Apportioned: 11,000sf = Warehouse (11 x 4.96 = 55 Trips) 5,000sf = Retail (5 x 86.56 = 433 Daily Trips x.52 Pass-by = 225 Trips) 1,000sf = Office (1 x 15.65 = 16 Trips) NNWT = Net New Weekday Trips (296 Trips) Impact Fee = (NNWT) x (TED) x (COST) x (CDR) = (296) x (0.50) x (402.25) x (0.70) = $41,673 Total Fee = $41,673 28

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies 29

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies Data Collection for Independent Study (per Berkeley County Ordinance) Surveyed Ins/Outs of existing sites during business hours Study conducted on an average weekday (Tuesday-Thursday) for two different weeks Classified number of Motorcycles versus Cars/Trucks trips 30

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies Conclusions of Site #1 Independent Study 31

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies Conclusions of Site #1 Independent Study 76 average daily trips Conservative assumption that 25% of the trips are pass-by in nature NNWT value of 76 x 0.75 = 57 was used (vs. 296) The Impact Fee becomes: Impact Fee = (57) x (0.50) x ($402.25) x (0.85) = $9,744.51 A $33,000 Savings 32

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies BUT WAIT.THE NEW BUILDING IS BIGGER!!! Doesn t this mean there will be more trips? Not necessarily Number of Employees to remain the same Much of the increased space being used for storage and workshop No new services offered Hours of operation remain the same 33

Two Independent Impact Fee Studies BUT WAIT AGAIN.YOU DIDN T THINK IT WOULD BE THAT EASY DID YA? 34

VI. Final Agreement 35

Final Agreement County Comments/Recommendations for Site #1 Study: 25% Pass-by assumption ok Insisted the site would generate additional trips with larger building Compromise: assume existing building square footage is 50% bigger Thus NNWT value increases to 117.97 The Impact Fee becomes: Impact Fee = (117.97) x (0.50) x ($402.25) x (0.85) = $20,167.71 Still a $21,410 Savings 36

Final Agreement SITE #2 Existing Site Characteristics Building 9,950 sf, with additional 15,820 sf of storage outside the building 15 employees Open 9AM-6PM, Mon-Sat Future Site Characteristics 43,559 sf 15 Employees Open 9AM-6PM, Mon-Sat 37

Final Agreement Conclusions of Site #2 Independent Study 38

Final Agreement Conclusions of Site #2 Independent Study 323 average daily trips Conservative assumption that 25% of the trips are pass-by in nature Assumed existing square footage was 50% higher (per prior study County recommendation) NNWT value of 323 x 0.75 = 242 was used The Impact Fee becomes: Impact Fee = (316) x (0.50) x ($402.25) x (0.85) = $54,022.18 A $72,000 Savings 39

Final Agreement County Comments/Recommendations on Site #2 Study: 25% Pass-by assumption ok Compromise: assume existing building square footage is 20% bigger Thus NNWT value increases to 380 The Impact Fee becomes: Impact Fee = (380) x (0.50) x ($402.25) x (0.85) = $64,963.38 Still a $61,000 Savings 40

Final Agreement Moral of Story: ITE Trip Generation used to calculate Impact Fees needs to be carefully reviewed especially for small unique developments. 41

Thank You Questions are Welcome! 42