Energy and commodity price benchmarking and market insights London, Houston, Washington, New York, Portland, Calgary, Santiago, Bogota, Rio de Janeiro, Singapore, Beijing, Tokyo, Sydney, Dubai, Moscow, Astana, Kiev, Porto and Johannesburg Market Reporting Consulting Events
The future of natural gas bid week Presented to the Ohio Gas Association July 16, 2014 David Givens Head of gas and power services, North America Givco Grancharov Statistician/Data Analyst
Topics to be covered FERC actions over time Changes to market fundamentals Emerging trends for Ohio and the nation Role of Argus Analysis shows changes in North America Decline in one-month trading activity
How we got here
Key FERC orders 1983 -- 319: Self-implementing transport 1984 -- 380: No minimum commodity bill 1985 -- 436: Open access 1991 -- 636: Unbundling 2005 -- AD04-11: Market based-rates for storage 2008 -- 712: Capacity release
Recent major FERC order 11/13 -- 787: Gas-electric coordination Pipelines, grid operators share non-public information No passing on to third parties Grid operators must get FERC authorization to share interstate pipeline information with LDCs Driver: power grid reliability Generators have no interest in purchase of FT
Results of Order 787 New England, New York and PJM used Order 787 to improve gas dispatch in winter 2013-14 But the two markets still don t work hand in glove Duke Energy wants $9.8mn back Gas already is the top fuel in New England, New York PJM, MISO may eventually follow
NAESB tackles gas-electric changes FERC wants two more intraday cycles PLUS a 4am CT start to gas day Gas and electric groups could not agree on gas day start But the industries are in agreement that one more intraday cycle will suffice Consensus deadline is late September
Recent history
Bid week existed for specific reasons Transfer and use of well logs and flow data Determine purchase quantity, available transportation Reservations of transport (mail, phone, fax, EBB) Price discovery, trading Pipeline confirmation
Evolution from bid week has been in play Traders respond to reliable storage data Hedge funds Commodity index funds And the traditional parties Producers Marketers LDCs Generators End-users Capacity release Around-the-clock electronic execution
Some are dissatisfied with bid week tools Fixed price, physical basis, indexes have been used for almost 25 years Physical basis trades, used for index calculation, based on Nymex Henry Hub expiration day All have drawbacks if Nymex is volatile near expiry Common complaint: early basis (trigger) deals deviate from later fixed price trades which comprise the index
Positive developments occurred since 1985 Self scheduling, end to pipeline sales gas Low barriers to entry Cycles of margin compression
Undesirable outcomes could not be avoided Credit risk Moral hazard Regulatory risk Atomized markets
Gas proliferates after deregulation Marcellus domination New play: Bakken Gas patch persistence Barnett Haynesville Eagle Ford Fayetteville Woodford Unreachable for now New York State Monterey (Calif.) B.C. interior (Canada) Hubei province (China) Hoback (Wyo.) Uncertain Niobrara (Colo.) Utica
Fundamentals have changed 1983 2013 Dry production 16 Tcf 24 Tcf Consumption 16.8 Tcf 26 Tcf Population 234 mn 316 mn
Impact in Ohio and the midcontinent
Emerging trends: Marcellus Philadelphia-NYC reaps benefits Transco zone 5 does not Rising production continually weakens basis Utica methane, NGLs a great boon
Rockies Express flows drop on Marcellus growth Flows at far eastern end of Rockies Express down since 2011 Marcellus displaces demand for Rockies supply Extreme cold in winter 2013-14 boosts flows in Illinois 1,200 1,000 mn cf/d 800 600 400 200 - Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Blue Mound CS to Illinois-Indiana border Indiana-Ohio state line to Hamilton CS Chandlersville CS to Clarington, Ohio Source: Ventyx
Rockies Express advances east-to-west project 1.2 Bcf/d westbound capacity in zone 3 Bidirectional between Moultrie County, Illinois and Clarington, Ohio FERC application filed 10 June 2014 Seneca lateral flowing in June 2014
Appalachia producers drive east-to-west project Rockies Express east-to-west zone 3 project Shipper Capacity (Bcf/d) American Energy 0.53 EQT 0.29 Gulfport Energy 0.17 Rice Drilling 0.17 Total 1.16 Source: Rockies Express Pipeline
Utica production ramps up to 0.9 Bcfe/d in 2014 1Q 2014 production from Ohio s Utica shale reaches 867mn cfe/d: 748mn cfe/d Natural gas and NGLs (86pc of output) 21,678 b/d Crude (14pc of output) 406mn cfe/d Chesapeake Energy, 177mn cfe/d Gulfport Energy, 106mn cfe/d Antero Resources Utica 1Q 2014 output up by 56pc from 4Q 2013 2012 output at 45mn cfe/d
Emerging trends: Midcontinent Higher prices than Gulf, Northeast in winter Reduced production from US, Canada Storage benefits are more evident OK, KS output not net add to shale gale
The role of Argus is to provide transparency
London Houston Washington New York Portland Calgary Santiago Bogota Rio de Janeiro Singapore Beijing Tokyo Sydney Dubai Moscow Astana Kiev Porto Johannesburg
Argus Natural Gas Americas Began 2009 US & Canada 100 daily indexes 80 bid week indexes RFPs issued using Argus indexes
FERC PL03-3 creates new indexation order Gone are Faxes Phone calls Survey method New Emphasis Data quality Transparency Auditability Reduced importance Volumes ending in 000 Daisy chaining Pools/Zones/Hubs Successful firms Specific volumes Meter numbers Real customers
Bid week activity has declined
Canadian trading has changed 1,200 1,000 1,178 Winter (Nov-Mar) bid week trade counts 979 1,054 800 718 799 600 400 339 415 373 376 453 200 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Dawn NIT (Aeco)
Some hub trading volumes have declined 1.20 Bid week volumes, mn mmbtu/d 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Mar 09 Nov 09 Aug 10 Jun 11 Mar 12 Nov 12 Aug 13 Jun 14 NGPL TexOk Columbia Gulf mainline Tennessee 500 line Columbia Appalachian
Dominion, Panhandle winter deals are down 500 400 437 Winter (Nov-Mar) bid week trade counts 398 300 294 262 265 303 309 317 200 206 200 100 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Panhandle Eastern OK Dominion, Appalachian
Scope of analysis influenced by many factors Argus is one North American gas index publisher out of several Census methodologies are identical Data contributors come and go There are barriers to participation Economic changes: consumption, technology
Marcellus gas needs a home 250 Trades 200 150 100 50 0 Mar 09 Mar 10 Apr 11 Apr 12 May 13 Jun 14 SOUTHWEST LOCAL GULF Linear (SOUTHWEST) Linear (LOCAL) Linear (GULF)
Marcellus gas replaces traditional sources 1,900,000 1,600,000 1,300,000 1,000,000 700,000 400,000 Volume, mmbtu 100,000 Mar 09 Mar 10 Apr 11 Apr 12 May 13 Jun 14 SOUTHWEST LOCAL GULF Linear (SOUTHWEST) Linear (LOCAL) Linear (GULF)
Bid week has become less important Most volumes, trade counts fall over four years Notable exceptions Eagle Ford: NGPL, Transco Marcellus: mostly markets off of Tetco, Transco Tennessee Gas Pipeline, all zones Rockies: CIG, NW, Kern/Opal, Cheyenne hub, Malin Deep South: Transco zone 4, SoNat Mich Con
Does relative value drive contracting practices? Henry hub monthly spot cash in $/mmbtu May 1990 (first month futures delivery): $1.49 November 2013: $3.49 June 2014: $4.62
Prices reflect market changes Natural Gas US PPI 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1967 1974 1982 1990 1998 2006 2014
Price does not account for bid week trend 8.5 7.5 6.5 Prices $/mmbtu 5.5 4.5 3.5 2.5 1.5 Mar 09 Mar 10 Apr 11 Apr 12 May 13 Jun 14 SOUTHWEST LOCAL GULF Linear (SOUTHWEST) Linear (LOCAL) Linear (GULF)
Number of US natural gas customers rises Commercial Residential 5.6 70 5.2 64 Commercial, mn 4.8 4.4 58 52 Residential, mn 4.0 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 46 EIA
Nymex, bid week volumes diverge Bid week volumes vs. Nymex prompt open interest 20,000,000 350,000 300,000 mmbtu/d 16,000,000 12,000,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 Open interest 50,000 8,000,000 0 Nov 09 Jun 10 Feb 11 Oct 11 Jun 12 Feb 13 Oct 13 Jun 14 Volume Open Interest Linear (Volume) Linear (Open Interest )
Weak correlation of Nymex, bid week trades Bid week trades vs. Nymex prompt open interest 3,400 350,000 Trades 2,800 2,200 300,000 250,000 200,000 Open Interest 1,600 150,000 1,000 100,000 Nov 09 Jun 10 Feb 11 Oct 11 Jun 12 Feb 13 Oct 13 Jun 14 Matched Trades Trades Open Interest Linear (Matched Trades) Linear (Trades)
Regression results: 56 monthly observations Matched trades-open interest as prompt R square 0.018 Correlation function is insignificant Matched trades-bid week volume-open interest R square 0.784 Can be seen as meaningful with change to function
Bid week suffers as industry succeeds Ubiquitous supply Deregulated, plentiful storage and transport Some major participants say they do not use it Why not use other options? Daily Asset Management Arrangements Term contracts favor buyers
Difficult to foresee changes for bid week Regulators understand indexing Hedging forces contested evaluation of Purchase Hedge Index Stable market conditions Utility focus may be elsewhere Decoupling Other initiatives
Key Takeaways Natural gas pricing mechanisms Driven by regulation, legacy No longer constrained Variety of supply, transport, contract choices Bid week loses significance, BUT The mind of a regulator is hard to change Some gas is still searching for a home in bid week
Any questions?
David Givens Head of gas and power services, North America Email: david.givens@argusmedia.com Phone: 1-202-349-2891 Givco Grancharov Statistician and data analyst Email: givco.grancharov@argusmedia.com Phone: 1-202-349-2877 Copyright notice Copyright 2013 Argus Media Ltd. All rights reserved. All intellectual property rights in this presentation and the information herein are the exclusive property of Argus and and/or its licensors and may only be used under licence from Argus. Without limiting the foregoing, by reading this presentation you agree that you will not copy or reproduce any part of its contents (including, but not limited to, single prices or any other individual items of data) in any form or for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Argus. Trademark notice ARGUS, ARGUS MEDIA, the ARGUS logo, DeWitt, FMB, FUNDALYTICS, ARGUS publication titles and ARGUS index names are trademarks of Argus Media Limited. Visit www.argusmedia.com/trademarks for more information. Disclaimer All data and other information presented (the Data ) are provided on an as is basis. Argus makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, adequacy, timeliness, or completeness of the Data or fitness for any particular purpose. Argus shall not be liable for any loss or damage arising from any party s reliance on the Data and disclaims any and all liability related to or arising out of use of the Data to the full extent permissible by law.
Argus Direct Alerts: Respond to the the natural gas market changing conditions in a timely manner Argus Direct Alerts provide immediate access to market moving news, intelligent analysis and robust price assessments. They are: Flexible: Get alerted on your desktop, phone or through email Relevant: Choose what news, analysis and prices you want to be alerted on Immediate: There is no quicker way to receive Argus content Experience Argus Direct via the video presentation here Not currently an Argus subscriber? Click here to request a complimentaty trial