ABBOT GROUP LIMITED TO PAY 5.6 MILLION AFTER CORRUPTION REPORT

Similar documents
Submission on the Bribery Act 2010

GUIDANCE NOTE TO SCOTLAND S COLLEGES AND COLLEGE BOARDS OF MANAGEMENT ON THE BRIBERY ACT 2010

Justice Committee evidence session: The Work of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) Pre-hearing memorandum from the Serious Fraud Office

Overview on anti-corruption rules and regulations in the UNITED KINGDOM

Serious Fraud Office. Introduction

Confiscation orders: progress review

The Bribery Act 2010:

QUESTIONNAIRE Country self-assessment report on implementation and enforcement of G20 commitments on foreign bribery

Fraud In The Private Sector

Summary: Analysis & Evidence Policy Option 1

The UK Government has published Guidance Notes to help companies ensure they are in step with the new requirements ( the Guidance ).

Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols. Document Details. Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Strategy

James Sale Project Officer, Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare Programme (PHP) Transparency International UK

THE BRIBERY ACT 2010 A SHORT GUIDE. Sean Larkin QC QEB Hollis Whiteman

Called Contact Senior Clerk - John Pyne Telephone Fax

ADVISORY White Collar

NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL SECTION. Dublin 21 April 2017

Anti-Bribery Policy. Copyright Oceanscan All rights reserved 2012 Page 1 of 5

Bribery Act 2010: The Impact on U.K. Business

Services of the International Criminal and Regulatory Bar

Anti - Fraud and Corruption Policy

Report. by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Criminal Justice System. Confiscation orders

Member States capabilities in fighting tax crimes

Public Expenditure Provisional Outturn

Serious Economic Crime A boardroom guide to prevention and compliance

Unexplained wealth orders explained

Serious Fraud Office Heads of Division candidate information pack

Impact Assessment (IA) Summary: Intervention and Options. Title:

Bribery and Corruption

Anti-Bribery Policy. The Company Compliance Officer is the Director of Organisational Effectiveness.

Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Bill

FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY DRAFT GUIDANCE POLITICALLY EXPOSED PERSONS

Lucy Sutcliffe Fiscal Crime Liaison Officer Pretoria, South Africa

1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary

Fraud Control Framework

Performance Measurement in the UK Justice Sector

Response to DPA Consultation Paper CP9/2012

New Corporate Offence for failing to prevent Tax Evasion: Are you prepared?

Anti-Bribery & Corruption Policy. OneMarket Limited ACN (Company)

The UK Bribery Act 2010: what you need to know. CMS Cameron McKenna

Insurance Fraud Enforcement Department. Referral guide

The Bribery Act A Brave New World for Business?

Doing business and the Bribery Act 2010

Anti-Money Laundering - A Practical Guide 27th September Doug Hopton Director DTH Associates Limited

Financial Crime & Punishment

APPENDIX 2 CORPORATE ANTI-FRAUD AND CORRUPTION STRATEGY

gamevy Anti- Money Laundering Detecting and Preventing Financial Crime Training for Gamevy

STATEMENT OF INTENT E.40 SOI 2014

UNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

Setting up and Registering as a Charity

Crime and Courts Act 2013: Deferred Prosecution Agreements Code of Practice

NFA response to government consultation on social housing fraud

Executive summary...v. About the authors...ix

Fraud and Error Penalties and Sanctions. Equality impact assessment March 2011

Data Protection Privacy Notice for people not directly involved in the accident

He also acts in murder and other cases of serious crime and is instructed in regulatory matters, for example on behalf of the Football Association.

The Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) & Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS)

Financial Crime Policy

ARNOLD PORTER (UK) LLP

NEW UK CRIMINAL OFFENCES OF FAILURE TO PREVENT FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE SERIOUS CRIME ACT 2007 (SPECIFIED ANTI-FRAUD ORGANISATIONS) ORDER No. 2353

Corruption?! slaughter and may. April 2008

Failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion

ANTI-FRAUD, BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY

U.K. Bribery Act Implications for Companies Doing Business in the United Kingdom. Wednesday, 28 July 2010

an increased likelihood, in appropriate cases, of a civil rather than a criminal outcome;

bribery and corruption helping you keep your business in-check

XS Direct Insurance Brokers Limited s Terms of Business

The Bribery Act 2010: what you need to know. CMS Cameron McKenna

Financial Policies and Procedures Preventing Bribery, Corruption and Money Laundering (August 2018)

Criminal Finances Act 2017 Update

Joint Equity. Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Manual

Corporate Anti-Fraud Team (CAFT) Q3 Progress Report: 1 st October 31 st December 2014

Bar Council response to the consultation paper on Tackling offshore tax evasion: A new criminal offence

LEGISLATIVE CONSENT MEMORANDUM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE AND CLAIMS BILL

REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 226 SESSION JUNE HM Revenue & Customs. Progress in tackling tobacco smuggling

Report of the Finance Director to the meeting of the Governance & Audit Committee to be held on 29 th

Fraud Bulletin. Issue 9, October 2015

NATIONAL MINIMUM WAGEAND NATIONALLIVING WAGE. PolicyonHMRevenue&Customs enforcement,prosecutionsand namingemployerswhobreak NationalMinimum Wagelaw

SCOTTISH CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL AND CRIMINAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE BILL

Bermuda s Bribery Act 2016 What Your Organisation Should Be Doing to Comply

Mr Robert Wardle The Director Serious Fraud Office Elm House Elm Street London WC1X 0BJ. Fax:

Ministry of Justice Memorandum on Main Estimate

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES INTERIM REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Anti-Money Laundering. Renu Kiran

Review of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007: The Government Response

PUBLIC SECTOR AUDIT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

Privacy Notice Student Loans Company Ltd

Ian Unsworth QC. clear compelling approachable. Year of Call 1992, Year of Silk 2010

Corporate M&A APPLICATION OF THE UK BRIBERY ACT 2010 TO IRISH COMPANIES AND PARTNERSHIPS CARRYING ON BUSINESS IN THE UK

The Most Innovative Law Firm in Europe. Shale Gas Toolkit. Managing Protest Action Part 4

IAP Conference Bangkok Asset Recovery in Major Fraud and Corruption Cases: The SFO s Recent Experience

Institute of Actuaries DPB Compliance Bulletin No. 23 October 2011 Anti Money Laundering

Cameron Scott Essex Street London WC2R 3AA Profile

Who Leads the Way in Anti-Corruption Enforcement: A Comparison Between the UK, the United States and France

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING/ COUNTERING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM STRATEGY GROUP

IN THE CROWN COURT AT SOUTHWARK IN THE MATTER OF s. 45 OF THE CRIME AND COURTS ACT Before :

The new UK Bribery Act: why you need to be prepared

Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

Focus Underwriting. Policy Summary Commercial Legal Expenses Insurance A PARTNER YOU CAN TRUST

Transcription:

Nov. 23, 2012 Press Release Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Services Scotland (Retrieved from http://www.crownoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/2012/11/abbot-group- Limited-pay-%C2%A356-million-after-corruption-report) ABBOT GROUP LIMITED TO PAY 5.6 MILLION AFTER CORRUPTION REPORT The Civil Recovery Unit is to recover 5.6 million under Proceeds of Crime legislation after a Scottish drilling company accepted that it had benefited from unlawful conduct. Abbot Group Limited ( Abbot ), which is based in Aberdeen, admitted that it had benefited from corrupt payments made in connection with a contract entered into by one of its overseas subsidiaries and an overseas oil and gas company. The contract was entered into in 2006 and the payments were made in 2007. The sum to be paid by Abbot represents the profit made by the company under the contract. Since then, the ownership and structure of Abbot has changed significantly. The corrupt payments were brought to light in May 2011 following enquiries by an overseas tax authoritity which resulted in an investigation by a firm of solicitors and a firm of accountants instructed by Abbot itself. Abbot reported the results of the investigation to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service in July 2012 under the self-reporting initiative. In view of any criminal investigation of others that may follow, it is not possible to provide any further details of the corrupt payments. In accordance with the published guidance on self-reporting, the following criteria were considered in the decision to refer this case to the Civil Recovery Unit for an extra-judicial settlement:- the nature and seriousness of the offence and the extent of the harm caused; the extent of the wrongdoing within the business, including whether the conduct was authorised by, or connived in, by senior management, or restricted to a small number of lower-ranking individuals; whether it is clear that the business is taking action as soon as the matter comes to the attention of senior management (as opposed to taking no action until it becomes aware that there is a risk that the conduct is going to come to light);

whether the business (or the individuals involved in the matter reported) has any previous record for this type of conduct. This would go beyond a previous criminal conviction, and would include any regulatory enforcement action or warning; whether the individuals involved in the wrongdoing have left the business and, where decisions were taken at Board level, whether there is a new Board in place, and in both cases the timing and reasons for the departure of these individuals; whether the business has honoured its commitment to engage with the Crown meaningfully and in particular to disclose the full extent of the wrongdoing; whether the business had in place adequate anti-bribery systems at the time of the criminal conduct and whether it has further addressed this following the conduct; whether there are particular considerations which may weigh against prosecution, such as the consequences of prosecution for the company s employees and stakeholders. Abbot is the first company to enter into a civil settlement under the self-reporting initiative since it was introduced in 2011. Speaking of the case, the Solicitor General, Lesley Thomson QC said, Bribery and corruption cause worldwide damage to business and economic development. The self-reporting initiative creates a mechanism for businesses to recognise their corporate responsibility and take a rigorous approach to the investigation and elimination of such practices. While consideration must first be given to prosecution of appropriate cases, I am pleased that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and the Civil Recovery Unit are committed to taking effective steps to ensure that businesses face up to their responsibilities and relinquish any unlawfully obtained profits. Ruaraidh Macniven, Head of the Civil Recovery Unit said, Abbot is the first company to have met the strict criteria of the self-reporting initiative since it was introduced in 2011. That initiative enables responsible businesses to draw a line under previous conduct and, providing the criteria are met, affords the possibility of a civil settlement. Self-reporting is an important way to ensure that corruption is exposed and that companies put in place effective systems to prevent it. The funds which have been recovered will be remitted to the Scottish Consolidated Fund. Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said:

This significant recovery made through the excellent work of the Civil Recovery Unit will be invested in the Scottish Government s hugely successful CashBack for Communities Programme which takes cash from the Proceeds of Crime and invests it in a range of sporting, cultural, community mentoring projects and sports facilities for the benefit of our young people and their communities. The 5.6m will be used to further expand the 46m CashBack Programme by funding projects that will contribute towards delivering youth employability, healthy lifestyles and reducing re-offending for the young people of Scotland. Ends Further information 1. The Bribery Act 2010 creates offences of bribing another person and of being bribed, and creates a separate offence of bribing a foreign public official. There is a new offence of commercial organisations failing to prevent bribery by persons associated with them. The Act also makes provision for prosecution in the United Kingdom of acts of bribery committed abroad by those with a close connection to the UK. 2. Each case reported to COPFS under the self-reporting initiative is considered on its own merits. The Serious Organised Crime Division considers what action requires to be taken in the public interest in these cases. There may be self-reported cases where it is in the public interest to refer the case to the Civil Recovery Unit with a view to a civil settlement being agreed. There will be other cases that are so serious that they will merit prosecution and confiscation proceedings. As with Bribery Act cases reported by the police, decisions about proceedings in self-reported cases will be made by Crown Counsel. 3. The self-reporting initiative was launched on 1 July 2011 when the Bribery Act 2010 came into force and was to last for an initial period of 12 months. The initiative was reviewed at the conclusion of this period and a decision was made that the initiative was to be extended for a further 12 months, until 30 June 2013. 4. The sum to be recovered in this case is to be paid in three stages by 31 March 2015 with interest on any outstanding sums being payable by Abbot at the judicial rate of 8% per year. 5. The Lord Advocate has given his approval to the publication of Guidance on the Approach of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service to the

Reporting of Bribery Offences by Businesses. - http://www.copfs.gov.uk/publications/2012/11/guidance-approach-crown- Office-and-Procurator-Service-Reporting-Businesses-Bribery-Offences. This Guidance sets out in detail how reports by a company should be made and how COPFS will approach these. The Guidance sets out the criteria that SOCD will apply when assessing self-reported cases. 6. This initiative is similar to a scheme operated in England, Wales and Northern Ireland by the Serious Fraud Office. There has been discussion between staff at Crown Office and the SFO as to the introduction of the initiative in Scotland and there will be continuing liaison between Crown Office and the SFO in relation to any cases where there are cross-border issues. 7. The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) came into force early in 2003. One of the major innovations of POCA was the establishment of a non-conviction based civil recovery scheme. That scheme is set out in Part 5 of POCA. Under that scheme, the enforcement authority for Scotland is the Scottish Ministers. 8. The Civil Recovery Unit acts on behalf of the Scottish Ministers in the exercise of their functions under Part 5 of POCA. In practice, the CRU investigates and recovers the proceeds of crime without the need for criminal conviction. The CRU is a multi-disciplinary team comprising solicitors, financial investigators, support staff and forensic accountants. The civil recovery functions of the CRU are exercised independently of the prosecutorial functions of the rest of COPFS. 9. The Civil Recovery Unit works together with colleagues at the Crown Office Serious and Organised Crime Division, and other law enforcement agencies, such as the Scottish Crime anddrug Enforcement Agency, UK Police Forces, HM Revenue and Customs and Department for Work & Pensions (DWP) to identify and recover the proceeds of crime. 10. Since 2003, the use of the Proceeds of Crime Act in Scotland has allowed over 60m to be recovered from criminals. Since the inception of CashBack in 2007, over 46m or 90% of those monies recovered from that time have been ploughed back into a wide range of sporting, cultural, educational and mentoring activities and facilities for children and young people and their communities. Since the programme's inception in 2007, over 600,000 young people across Scotland have benefited from CashBack activities and projects..details can be found at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/topics/justice/public-safety/17141/cashback. 11. The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service is a committed member of the Scottish Government s Serious Organised Crime Task Force. The Task Force has a remit to pursue serious organised crime in all its forms by bringing together all agencies involved in tackling organised crime groups. Task Force members include the Cabinet Secretary for Justice, the Lord Advocate, representatives from COPFS, the Scottish Government, ACPOS, SCDEA, HMRC, SOCA and SPS. Details of the work of the Taskforce can be accessed here:http://www.scotland.gov.uk/topics/justice/crimes/organised-crime