Impacts of New Tourism in Rural and Remote Communities in Jalisco State, Mexico

Similar documents
Self-Perceived Stress at Work

Cuban Public Opinion Survey

CODEBOOK QNHS microdata ad-hoc module on disability in the labour force q2 2002

Alberta Low Wage Profile April March 2017

Alberta Low Wage Profile April March 2018

LMI. Inside this abstract:

District Demographic Profile: Forest Heath

Average persons in household. Top three industries Post-secondary education (25 64 years) 7.1% Unemployment rate

Reasons to Go

41% of Palauan women are engaged in paid employment

newstats 2016 NWT Annual Labour Force Activity NWT Bureau of Statistics Overview

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

1981 Population Census Preliminary Report on Labour Force Composition

Fidelity 2013 New Year Financial Resolutions Study Executive Summary

The Kangaroo Island (DC) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report

Appendix G: La Crosse County Summary. Demographics

Cuban Public Opinion Survey June 30 July 13, 2011

Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC)

2017 Survey of Individuals in Selected Communities 1

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean. Population Entire MSA

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

City of Edmonton Population Change by Age,

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

BOTSWANA MULTI-TOPIC HOUSEHOLD SURVEY POVERTY STATS BRIEF

SECTION- III RESULTS. Married Widowed Divorced Total

Individual giving survey 2008

Canadian Clothing Manufacturing: A Comparative Perspective

Cuban Public Opinion Survey February 29 March 14, 2012

GB (numbers) All people 185,200 5,462,900 57,851,100 Males 93,500 2,680,900 28,275,200 Females 91,700 2,782,000 29,575,900.

ALBERTA LABOUR FORCE PROFILES Aboriginal People in the Labour Force Alberta Labour Force Profiles

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: 2nd quarter 2018

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: 3d quarter 2018

CONTENT ANNEX... 1 CONTENT... 2 ANNEX A TABLES... 6 HOW TO READ SMMRI TABLES DEMOGRAPHY...

Measuring the Economic Returns from Festivals and Special Events

An Investigation of Determinants and Constraints of Urban Employment in Shone Town, Ethiopia

Projections for Palmerston North

Usual Resident Population Count , , ,253. Usual Resident Population Change , % ,

Correlation of Personal Factors on Unemployment, Severity of Poverty and Migration in the Northeastern Region of Thailand

Highlands and Islands Enterprise. Location Profile Keith December 2011

SASKATCHEWAN FINANCE

The Northern Ireland labour market is characterised by relatively. population of working age are not active in the labour market at

Charlotte County SOUTHWEST FLORIDA Economic Development Office

SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Toward Active Participation of Women as the Core of Growth Strategies. From the White Paper on Gender Equality Summary

Cuentapropistas: A Survey of Cuban Entrepreneurs. October 26 November 25, 2017

2011 Annual Socio- Economic Report

Toward a resource mobilization plan

BBC Radio 5 Live: Over-60s Sex Survey

Q2 (Qualitative and Quantitative) Analysis to Understand Poverty Dynamics in Uganda

BUSI 460 Suggested Answers to Selected Review and Discussion Questions Lesson 10

Perceptions of Welfare Research 2010

Sarasota County. Citizen Opinion Survey

EAGLE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY. May 16-19, 2016

R3 Personal Debt Snapshot Wave 11 - June

Keeping San Diego Tourism Competitive. SD Commission on Revenue & Economic Competitiveness May 13, 2010

1 Botswana- Literacy Survey 2013-STATS BRIEF. 1. Introduction

Georgian National Study

Survey on the Living Standards of Working Poor Families with Children in Hong Kong

July Sub-group Audiences Report

Scenic Rim Regional Council Community Sustainability Indicators 2009

Regional emerging hubs - catalysts, drivers and constraints

Opportunity Zone Pads For Sale Or Lease

2017 Alberta Labour Force Profiles Youth

Alberta Minimum Wage Profile April March 2017

LABOR MARKET INFORMATION NEWSLETTER AGUADILLA-ISABELA-SAN SEBASTIÁN MSA APRIL TO JUNE 2012

Working conditions in Zanzibar

Factors Influencing Perceptions of Climate and Weather Effects on Property Ownership

Economic Vitality and Fiscal Health6. Cabrillo College

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

Transcription:

Impacts of New Tourism in Rural and Remote Communities in Jalisco State, Mexico Derrek Eberts, Brandon University Rodrigo Espinoza Sánchez, Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de la Costa Presented at the 2014 Annual Conference of the Canadian Association of Geographers, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON

Methods 6 towns Resident surveys: n=25 each, 20 questions, plus some demographics Key informant interviews n=2 each, tourism officials or planning officials

1. Age 3. Income 8% 8% 20% 8% 32% 20% 16% 56% 20% 15-25 years 26-35 years 36-45 years 46-55 years 66-75 years $1000 - $3000 $3001 - $5000 $5001 - more Not Answered 2. Sex 4. Education 20% 8% 24% 28% 80% 40% Male Female Elementary Secondary High School Degree

6. What is your current occupation? 4% 4% 4% 16% 72% Student Agriculture Trade Secretary Bricklayer 6.1 Occupation of other adults in your family? 12% 8% 8% 12% 60% Fishing Agriculture Trade Student Bricklayer

7. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = least important and 10 = most important), how important do you think tourism is to Campo Acosta right now? 8. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = least important and 10 = most important), how important do you think it is for Campo Acosta to develop more tourism? 4% 12% 20% 84% 80% 5 8 10 8 10 9. What do you think are the main reasons for tourists to visit Campo Acosta? 40% 60% Beachs Dam "Cajón de Peñas"

10. What do you think will be the main benefits of more tourism in Campo Acosta over the next 5 years? 11. When will the benefits occur? 4% 4% 8% 8% 28% 72% 76% More economical income More employment 5-10 years 11-20 years When the construction of hotels and restaurants start Already happening Don't know 12. Who do you think will benefit most from tourism in Campo Acosta? 13. How long will the benefits last? 8% 20% 4% 4% 4% The town people 92% The government and investors 68% Of 5-10 years Of 11-20 years Always Long time Don't know

14. What do you think will be the main negative effects of more tourism in Campo Acosta over the next 5 years? 15. When do you think negative effects will be felt? 8% 8% 36% 44% 44% 56% 4% Insecurity Don't know Social problems (drug addiction and prostitution) In 4-6 years Already happening When the development tourism start Don't know 16. Who do you think will suffer most as a result of tourism in Campo Acosta? 4% 17. How long will the negative effects last? 4% 24% 32% 56% 72% 8% Who doesn't work in tourism No one Environment Of 10-20 years While tourism beech Always Don't know

18. Do you expect your family to be economically better off, worse off, or no different if there is more tourism here? 0% 100% Better off Worse off No different 20. Do you think health care amenities will be better, worse, or no different if there is more tourism development here? 8% 4% 22. Do you think infrastructure will be better, worse, or no different if there is more tourism development here? 0% 88% Will be better off Will be worse off No different 100% Better Worse No different

San Sebastian del Oeste

1.Age 2. Sex 15% 0% 10% 35% 50% 50% 15% 25% 15-25 Years 26-35 Years 36-45 Years 46-55 Years 56 or more 2. Sex Male Female 3.Income 4.Education 30% 25% 15% 25% 5% 20% 30% 20% $1000 - $2000 $2001 - $3000 $3001 - $4000 $4001 or More Not Answered 30% Degree Technical Degree Secundaria Primaria

6.what is yout current occupation? 5% 5% 20% 30% 5% 20% 10% 5% Student Administration Restaurant Taxi driver Housewife Trade Hotel Tourism Office 6.1 Occupation of other adults in your family? 5% 10% 5% 80% Work Trade Hotel Not Answered

7. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = least important and 10 = most important), how important do you think tourism is to San Sebastian del Oeste right now? 15% 8. On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = least important and 10 = most important), how important do you think it is for San Sebastian del Oeste to develop more tourism? 5% 10% 45% 15% 30% 65% 5% 10% 5 8 9 10 5 7 8 9 10 9. What do you think are the main reasons for tourists to visit San Sebastian del Oeste? 5% 5% 25% 20% 5% 20% 20% Antiquity Magical Town Nature Ecotourism Tranquility History Discover

10. What do you think will be the main benefits of more tourism in San Sebastian del Oeste over the next 5 years? 10% 15% 11. When will the benefits occur? 10% 5% 25% 15% 15% 5% 15% 40% 10% Employ Economy Infrastructure More Enterprises Tourist promotion Not Benefits 35% Short Term Medium Term Long Term Tourism Not Answered Never 12. Who do you think will benefit most from tourism in San Sebastian del Oeste? 10% 5% 5% 15% 13. How long will the benefits last? 0% 25% 35% 15% 50% 10% 30% Town Community Tourism Enterprises Trade Restaurants Goverment Always Long Term Short Term Tourism Not Answered

14. What do you think will be the main negative effects of more tourism in San Sebastian del Oeste over the next 5 years? 15. When do you think negative effects will be felt? 0% 5% 5% 5% 10% 5% 40% 50% 20% 15% 5% 10% 10% 20% Pollution Environmental Impact acculture Deterioration Nothing Tourism Seasonality Insecurity Type of tourists Short Term Medium Term Long Term Never Tourism Not Answered 16. Who do you think will suffer most as a result of tourism in San Sebastian del Oeste? 10% 20% 17. How long will the negative effects last? 5% 35% 25% 25% 5% 10% 5% 10% 30% Environment Buildings Town Population Nobody Trade 20% Short Term Medium Term Long Term Tourism Not Answered Never

18. Do you expect your family to be economically better off, worse off, or no different if there is more tourism here? 25% 0% 75% Better off Worse Off No different 20. Do you think health care amenities will be better, worse, or no different if there is more tourism development here? 22. Do you think infrastructure will be better, worse, or no different if there is more tourism development here? If better or worse, describe how? 25% 30% 0% 5% 65% 75% Will be Better Will Be Worse No different Will be Better Will be Worse Not Different

A couple of comparisons to Punta de Mita

Some Conclusions Generally very positive view of tourism development (or expansion) Anticipated benefits economic Anticipated costs much less certainty, but common theme is environment Little recognition of social or cultural impacts Reality may not meet expectations we will see in 5 years, 10 years (hopefully!)