THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Similar documents
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

2011 Winston & Strawn LLP

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

The Importance of Bilateral Investment Treaties When Structuring Foreign Investments

Choosing Investment Structure

Dutch tax treaty overview Q3, 2012

Dutch tax treaty overview Q4, 2013

TRENDS AND MARKERS Signatories to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime

Argentina Bahamas Barbados Bermuda Bolivia Brazil British Virgin Islands Canada Cayman Islands Chile

Scale of Assessment of Members' Contributions for 2008

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 CANADA

Request to accept inclusive insurance P6L or EASY Pauschal

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

ide: FRANCE Appendix A Countries with Double Taxation Agreement with France

2019 Daily Prayer for Peace Country Cycle

GEF Evaluation Office MID-TERM REVIEW OF THE GEF RESOURCE ALLOCATION FRAMEWORK. Portfolio Analysis and Historical Allocations

Withholding Tax Rates 2014*

International Trade Data System (ITDS) Source: Last Updated: 4/23/2004

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

HEALTH WEALTH CAREER 2017 WORLDWIDE BENEFIT & EMPLOYMENT GUIDELINES

Other Tax Rates. Non-Resident Withholding Tax Rates for Treaty Countries 1

2 Albania Algeria , Andorra

Legal Indicators for Combining work, family and personal life

Annex Supporting international mobility: calculating salaries

Non-resident withholding tax rates for treaty countries 1

Cross-Border Tax Regimes. Steven Sieker Partner, Baker McKenzie 28 June 2018

Luxembourg-Kazakhstan business relations A focus on financial services. 2 March 2017

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Gerry Weber International AG

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS

ANNEX. to the. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council

International Investment Arbitration in North America: Year in Review 2016

THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE )

GUIDE TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE ICSID CONVENTION

THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE )

ORD ISIN: DE / CINS CUSIP: D (ADR: / US )

TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF TUNISIA CONCERNING THE RECIPROCAL ENCOURAGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENT The

ILLEGALITY IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION. Sylvia T. Tonova

Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development Office of Workforce, Community Development, and Research

ANNEX 2: Methodology and data of the Starting a Foreign Investment indicators

YUM! Brands, Inc. Historical Financial Summary. Second Quarter, 2017

MAXIMUM MONTHLY STIPEND RATES FOR FELLOWS AND SCHOLARS. Afghanistan $135 $608 $911 1 March Albania $144 $2,268 $3,402 1 January 2005

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2017 UNITED STATES

WGI Ranking for SA8000 System

APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 UKRAINE. New paths ahead for international tax controversy

Panama Bilateral Investment Treaty

EMBARGOED UNTIL GMT 1 AUGUST

Pros and Cons of BITs for Developing Countries

International trade transparency: the issue in the World Trade Organization

THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE )

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

Information Leaflet No. 5

JPMorgan Funds statistics report: Emerging Markets Debt Fund

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE )

Total Imports by Volume (Gallons per Country)

Clinical Trials Insurance

Signed at Seoul May 17, 1994 Entered into force September 24, 1996

The Government of the Republic of Chile and the Government of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties),

Information Leaflet No. 5

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA FOR

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

When is an employee considered to be living away from their normal place of residence?

SANGAM GLOBAL PHARMACEUTICAL & REGULATORY CONSULTANCY

Section 872. Gross Income. Rev. Rul

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE )

Withholding Tax Handbook BELGIUM. Version 1.2 Last Updated: June 20, New York Hong Kong London Madrid Milan Sydney

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF GOVERNORS. Resolution No General Capital Increase

The Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the Republic of Nicaragua (hereinafter referred to as the "Contracting Parties"),

Switzerland Country Profile

Spain Country Profile

France Country Profile

Hannover Rueckversicherung AG

BERMUDA COPYRIGHT AND PERFORMANCES (APPLICATION TO OTHER COUNTRIES) ORDER 2009 BR 71/2009

Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 2011

ONLINE APPENDIX (DE NEVE AND WARD, HAPPINESS AT WORK)

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

Switzerland Country Profile

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA AND GEORGIA THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

Long Association List of Jurisdictions Surveyed for Which a Response Has Been Received

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

Today's CPI data: what you need to know

Country Documentation Finder

IBRD/IDA and Blend Countries: Per Capita Incomes, Lending Eligibility, IDA Repayment Terms

Article 1. The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Government of Romania, (hereinafter referred to as "the Contracting Parties")

Porsche Automobil Holding SE

France Country Profile

Transcription:

1 106TH CONGRESS 2d Session " SENATE! TREATY DOC. 106 46 PROTOCOL AMENDING INVESTMENT TREATY WITH PANAMA MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING PROTOCOL BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AMENDING THE TREATY CONCERNING THE TREAT- MENT AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS OF OCTOBER 27, 1982. PROTOCOL WAS SIGNED AT PANAMA CITY, ON JUNE 1, 2000 SEPTEMBER 12, 2000. Protocol was read the first time, and together with the accompanying papers, referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations and ordered to be printed for the use of the Senate 79 118 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, September 12, 2000. To the Senate of the United States: With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Protocol Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Panama Amending the Treaty Concerning the Treatment and Protection of Investments of October 27, 1982. This Protocol was signed at Panama City, on June 1, 2000. I transmit also, for the information of the Senate, the report of the Department of State with respect to this Protocol. The 1982 bilateral investment treaty with Panama (the 1982 Treaty ) was the second treaty to be signed under the U.S. bilateral investment treaty (BIT) program. The 1982 Treaty protects U.S. investment and assists Panama in its efforts to develop its economy by creating conditions more favorable for U.S. private investment and thereby strengthening the development of its private sector. As explained in the Department of State s report, the Protocol is needed in order to ensure that investors continue to have access to binding international arbitration following Panama s 1996 accession to the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, done at Washington, March 18, 1965 (the ICSID Convention ). The Protocol provides each Party s consent to international arbitration of investment disputes under the 1982 Treaty before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, established under the ICSID Convention. The Protocol also provides for arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. The Protocol thus facilitates the use of such procedures by investors of the Parties to resolve investment disputes under the 1982 Treaty. The Protocol also sets forth each Party s consent to ICSID Additional Facility arbitration, if Convention Arbitration is not available. Convention Arbitration would not be available, for example, if either Party subsequently ceased to be a party to the ICSID Convention. I recommend that the Senate consider this Protocol as soon as possible, and give its advice and consent to ratification of the Protocol at an early date. WILLIAM J. CLINTON. (III) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, August 11, 2000. The President, The White House. THE PRESIDENT: I have the honor to submit to you the Protocol Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Panama Amending the Treaty Concerning the Treatment and Protection of Investments of October 27, 1982. The Protocol was signed at Panama City, on June 1, 2000. I recommend that this Protocol be transmitted to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification. The 1982 bilateral investment treaty with Panama ( 1982 Treaty ) was the second treaty to be signed under the U.S. bilateral investment treaty ( BIT ) program. To date, 31 BITs are in force for the United States with Albania, Argentina, Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Cameroon, the Republic of the Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire), the Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Georgia, Grenada, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Panama, Poland, Romania, Senegal, Slovakia, Sri Lanka, Trinidad & Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, and Ukraine. The United States has also signed, but not yet brought into force, BITs with Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belarus, Bolivia, Croatia, El Salvador, Honduras, Jordan, Lithuania, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Russia, and Uzbekistan. One of the important objectives of the 1982 Treaty was to ensure that investors could arbitrate investment disputes with a Party in at least one forum, specified in the Treaty, by providing the prior consent of each Party to arbitrate investment disputes in that forum. This important investment protection was lost when the forum specified in the 1982 Treaty subsequently ceased to be available to the Parties. The Protocol restores this investment protection by providing the prior consent of the Parties to the use of specified alternative fora or arbitration rules to resolve investment disputes. The forum specified in the 1982 Treaty was the Additional Facility of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes ( ICSID ). ICSID was established by the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, done at Washington, March 18, 1965 ( ICSID Convention ) as a forum for international arbitration of investment disputes between Contracting States and nationals of other Contracting States ( Convention Arbitration ). The United States has been a Party to the ICSID Convention since its entry into force on October 14, 1966. (V) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 18:49 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm01 PsN: TD046

VI When the 1982 Treaty was signed, Panama was not a party to the ICSID Convention. Convention Arbitration therefore was not available for disputes involving Panama or its nationals. The ICSID Additional Facility, however, does provide a forum for arbitration of international investment disputes arising between parties where one party is not an ICSID Contracting State or a national of a Contracting State. The 1982 Treaty therefore specifies the ICSID Additional Facility as the primary forum for international arbitration, and under Article VII of the 1982 Treaty provides the prior consent of the Parties to the use of the Additional Facility. Under the 1982 Treaty, the parties may also mutually agree to use other dispute resolution procedures to resolve their investment dispute. The ICSID Convention entered into force with respect to Panama on May 8, 1996. As of that date, the Additional Facility ceased to be available for the settlement of investment disputes under the 1982 Treaty. The 1982 Treaty does not provide each Party s prior consent to the use of any other procedures for the resolution of investment disputes. Although an investor may still request a Party s consent to use any other dispute settlement procedures for the resolution of their investment dispute, the Party may withhold its consent. The Parties negotiated the Protocol to restore assured investor access to dispute settlement by providing each Party s prior consent to Convention Arbitration as well as arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law ( UNCITRAL Rules ). The Protocol thus facilities the use of such procedures by investors of the Parties to resolve investment disputes under the 1982 Treaty. The Protocol also sets forth each Party s consent to ICSID Additional Facility arbitration, if Convention Arbitration is not available. Convention Arbitration would not be available, for example, if either Party subsequently ceased to be a party to the ICSID Convention. The terms of the Protocol are described below. Article I (Amending Article VII of the 1982 Treaty) Paragraph 1 amends Article VII(3) of the 1982 Treaty by replacing that paragraph with the text set forth in Article I(1) of the Protocol. Under amended Article VII(3)(a), at any time after 6 months from the date upon which an investment dispute has arisen, the national or company concerned ( investor ) may consent in writing to the submission of the dispute to binding arbitration. In providing its consent, the investor may choose among convention Arbitration, the Additional Facility of ICSID (if Convention Arbitration is not available), or ad hoc arbitration using the UNCITRAL Rules. Once the investor has so consented, either party to the dispute may institute proceedings, provided that the dispute has not, for any reason, been submitted for resolution in accordance with any applicable dispute resolution procedure previously agreed upon and the investor has not brought the dispute before a judicial, administrative or agency tribunal of competent jurisdiction of either Party. Amended Article VII(3)(b) constitutes each Party s consent to the submission of investment disputes to binding arbitration in accord- VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

VII ance with the choice of the investor under amended Article VII(3)(a). Amended Article VII(3)(c) provides that if the parties elect conciliation or arbitration using Convention Arbitration or the Additional Facility, the regulations and rules of ICSID or the Additional Facility, as applicable, will govern. Under amended Article VII(3)(d), each Party commits to enforcing arbitral awards rendered pursuant to Article VII. The Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) satisfies the requirement for the enforcement of non-icsid Convention awards in the United States. The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Act of 1966 (22 U.S.C. 1650 1650a) provides for the enforcement of ICSID Convention awards. Amended Article VII(3)(e) provides that any non-convention Arbitration shall take place in a country that is a party to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards done at New York, June 10, 1958. This provision facilitates enforcement of arbitral awards. Paragraph 2 amends Article VII(5) of the 1982 Treaty by replacing that paragraph with the text set forth in Article I(2) of the Protocol. Amended Article VII(5) provides that, for the purposes of Article 25(2)(b) of the ICSID convention and Article VII of the 1982 Treaty, the nationality of a company in the host country will be determined by ownership or control, rather than by place of incorporation. This provision allows a company that is an investment covered by the 1982 Treaty to bring a claim in its own name. Article II (Entry into Force and Duration) Article II provides that the Protocol forms an integral part of the 1982 Treaty. The Protocol will enter into force upon an exchange of notes confirming that the Parties have completed their domestic legal requirements for entry into force of the Protocol. The Protocol will remain in force for so long as the 1982 Treaty is in force. If the 1982 Treaty is terminated, the Protocol will continue to be effective (as will the other Articles of the 1982 Treaty) for an additional 10 years as provided in Article XIII(4) of the 1982 Treaty. The 1982 Treaty was negotiated jointly by the Department of State and the Office of the United States Trade Representative, with the active participation of the Departments of Commerce and the Treasury. These agencies join me in recommending that it be transmitted to the Senate at an early date. Respectfully submitted. STROBE TALBOTT. VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

PROTOCOL BETWEE)I THE GOVERNMENT OF TlIE UNUED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVER."lMENT OF THE REPCBLlC OF P A:\IAMA AMENDING THE TREATY CONCERNING TIlE TREATMENT AJ\D PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS OF OCTOBER 27, 1982 The Government of the United States of America and the Govermnent of the Republic of Panama (hereinafter "the Parties"); Desiring \0 make more effeclive the Treaty Concenung the Treatment and Protection of Investments between!he Parties, signed at Washington on October 27, 1982 (hereinafter "!he Treaty"); Have agreed to amend the Treaty as follows: (1) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

2 -:2 - ARTICLE I 1. The te1.'t of Article VJI(3) shall read as tallows: (a) At any time after six months from the date upon which the dispute arose, the national or company concemed may choose to consent in writing to the submission of the dispute: (i) to the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes ("Centre"), established by the Convention on the Settlement ofinvestment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States, done at Washington, March 18, 1965 ("ICSID Convention"), for settlement eitller by conciliation or binding arbitration; (ii) to the Additional Facility ofthe Centre, if the Centre is not available, for settlement either by conciliation or binding arbitration; or (iii) in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on Intemational Trade Law ("UNCITRAL Rules"), for settlement by binding arbitration. Once the national or company concerned has so consented, either party to the dispute may institute proceedings before the Centre, the Additional Facility or in accordance with the UNCITRAL Rules, provided the dispute has not, fur any reason, been submitted for resolution in accordance with any applicable dispute settlement procedures previously agreed to by the parties to the dispute, and the national or company concerned has not brought the dispute before the courts of justice, administrative tribunals or agencies of competent jurisdiction of either Party. (b) Each Party hereby consents to the submission of an investment dispute in accordance with the choice of the national or company under paragraph 3(a)(i), (ii), and (iii). This consent and the submission of the dispute by a national or company under paragraph 3(a) shall satisfy the requirement of: (i) Chapter II of the ICSID Convention (Jurisdiction of the Centre) and the Additional Facility Rnles for written consent of the parties to the dispnte; and VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

3-3 ~ (il) Article II of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards done at New York, June 10,1958, under the auspices of the United Nations for an "agreement in wtiting." ( c) Where the national or company chooses to submit the dispute to the Centre or the Additional Facility, in. accordance with paragraph 3(a), conciliation or binding arbitration of such disputes shall be done in accordance with the provisions of the Regulations and Rules of the Centre or of the Additional Facility respectively. (d) Eaeh Party shan provide for the enf')tcement within its terrholy of arbitral awards rendered pursuant to this Article. (e) Any arbitration under paragraph 3(a)(jj) or 3(a)(iii) shall be held in a state that is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards done at New York, June 10, 1958, underthe auspices of the United Nations. 2. The text of Article VIl(5) shall read as follows: 5. For the purposes of Article 25(2)(b) of the ICSID Convention and this Article. any company duly incorporated, constituted or othervvise duly organized under the applicable laws and regulations of either Party or a political subdivision thereofbllt that. immediately before the occurrence of the event or events giving rise to the dispute, was owned or controlled by nationals or companies of the other Party, shall be treated as a national or company of the other Party. ARTICLE II 1. This Protocol shall form an integral part of the Treaty, and shall enter lnto force upon an exch:lnge of notes confitming that the Parties have completed their domestic legal requirements forenity into force of this Protocol. 2. This Protocol shall remain in force for so long as the Treaty shall remain in force. If the Treaty i"s terminated, this Protocol shall continue to be effective fm' a further period of ten years as provided in Article Xm( 4) of the Treaty. VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046

4-4 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, duly authorized by their respective Governments, have signed this Protocol. DONE in duplicate at Panama, this first day of June, 2000, in the English and Spanish languages, both texts being equally authentic. FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA: VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:06 Sep 13, 2000 Jkt 079118 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 E:\HR\OC\TD046.XXX pfrm02 PsN: TD046