Working Group Social Protection

Similar documents
Working Group Social Protection April Data validation: rules for the core system

Working Group Social Protection. 4-5 April Data validation: rules for the core system

Working Group Social Protection

Working Group Social Protection

Belgium analysis on pensions

Working Group Social Protection

Working Group Social Protection statistics

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES REFERENCE YEAR: 2015

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES REFERENCE YEAR: 2013

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES

PROPOSALS FOR IMPROVING QUALITY REPORTING

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES MEMBER STATE: REFERENCE YEAR: 2010

State of play regarding ESSPROS

ESSPROS Task Force on Methodology November 2017

IESS (Integrated European Social Statistics) Framework regulation: state of play and impact on the LFS

ESSPROS. Task Force on Methodology November 2017

ESSPROS Task Force on Methodology November Comparison of expenditure for social benefits between ESSPROS and national accounts

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES REFERENCE YEAR: 2013

Working Group Social Protection statistics

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES MEMBER STATE: REFERENCE YEAR: 2014

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES REFERENCE YEAR: 2014

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES

Second SHA2011-based pilot data collection 2014

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT

Item 3.5 MODERNISATION OF SOCIAL STATISTICS: Roadmaps for SILC, LFS, Education/Health and Population

Directorate F: Social Statistics and Information Society Unit F-3: Living conditions and social protection statistics ESSPROS TASK FORCE MEETING

ESSPROS Manual and user guidelines

The Resource use and management expenditure account (RUMEA)

Point 2.4. Feedback from LAMAS on IESS issues

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES

Meeting of the Article 83 of the Staff Regulations Working Group

QUALITY REPORT. Module on Net Social Protection Benefits (Restricted approach) REFERENCE YEAR: 2015 REPORT ISSUED:

Glossary of Concepts. Methodology for the Financial Data Standardisation Project (M4FDS)

Short minutes & Conclusions Item 13 of the agenda. Christine Coin ESTAT-F April 2017 Working Group Social Protection Statistics

Working Group meeting Statistics on Living Conditions / HBS June Eurostat-Luxembourg. BECH Building, Room Quetelet

AHM 2012 on TRANSITION FROM WORK TO RETIREMENT. Explanatory notes, list of variables and filters

Changes in the Overview matrix

Orig: EN 28 TH MEETING OF THE GNI COMMITTEE 6-7 MAY 2014 LUXEMBOURG, JMO BUILDING ROOM M1 STRUCTURE AND FORMAT OF THE GNP/GNI QUESTIONNAIRES 2014

Working Group Public Health Statistics

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

In 2009 a 6.5 % rise in per capita social protection expenditure matched a 6.1 % drop in EU-27 GDP

Point 5 of the agenda

ITEM 11b PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ON CULTURE

Eurostat Questionnaire on. Recording of flows and stocks relating to pension schemes in national accounts. August 12, 2003

Attempt of reconciliation between ESSPROS social protection statistics and EU-SILC

Payable tax credits Item 10 of the agenda

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. EUROSTAT Directorate C: National accounts, prices and key indicators Task Force EPSAS

Working Group meeting Statistics on Living Conditions May 2012 Eurostat-Luxembourg BECH Building, Room Quetelet

METHODOLOGY ESSPROS SYSTEM

In 2008 gross expenditure on social protection in EU-27 accounted for 26.4 % of GDP

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) of 6 July amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1165/98 concerning short-term statistics

EuroStat Occasional Paper: March 2011 February 2012

CYPRUS 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT WORKING GROUP. Document for item 4.3 of the agenda. Definition of indicators to supplement the unemployment rate

QUALITY REPORT ON STRUCTURE OF EARNINGS SURVEY 2010 IN SLOVENIA

Data collection on benefit recipients (SOCR) Updated figures and links with ESSPROS databases

Working Group on Population Statistics

Item 3.2 COMPLIANCE MONITORING

REPORTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. version 3.0 DIRECTORATE GENERAL STATISTICS. 15 December 2017

Draft agenda of the DIMESA Bureau March 2015

Statistical reporting of securitisation vehicles

REPORTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. version DIRECTORATE GENERAL STATISTICS. 18 July 2017

Economic Policy Committee s Ageing Working Group

Guidance Note. Validation and verification of the 3.5 OTC - Equities Sheet. Relevant to the JFSC s prudential reporting requirements of JIBs

QUALITY REPORT ESSPROS PENSION BENEFICIARIES

Guidelines for the use of Pension SEDs, Flows and Portable Document P1

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A G E N E R A L E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T P L

T HE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS D EFINITION & T REATMENT OF DAS ERRORS

Income Distribution Database (

THE SEVENTH CZECH REPORT ON THE FULFILMENT OF THE EUROPEAN CODE OF SOCIAL SECURITY. for the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017

PY010G/PY010N: Employee cash or near cash income

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

European Railway Agency Recommendation on the 1 st set of Common Safety Methods (ERA-REC SAF)

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

CYPRUS FINAL QUALITY REPORT

POLAND 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN SERVICES STATISTICS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Errors in Operational Spreadsheets: A Review of the State of the Art

EXCLUSION. Reduce the number of long-term unemployed by 320,000 by 2020, measured against the annual average in 2008.

Fourteenth Meeting of the IMF Committee on Balance of Payments Statistics Tokyo, Japan, October 24-26, 2001

Social protection in the European Union

ECB-PUBLIC REGULATION (EU) [2018/[XX*]] OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of [date Month 2018] amending Regulation (EU) No 1333/2014

Comparison of Income Items from the CPS and ACS

QUALITY REPORT. Module on Net Social Protection Benefits (Restricted approach) REFERENCE YEAR: 2015

1. Overview of the pension system

THE BOARD OF THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA. ORDINANCE No 158-N On approving Regulation 20/02

Republic of Slovenia

Official Journal of the European Union

Pension Scheme of European Officials (PSEO) Actuarial assumptions used in the assessment

Proposal for new modules for inclusion in Regulation 691/2011 Environmental Protection Expenditure module

Twinning, social-statistics Israel Denmark. Social statistics

In 2006, gross expenditure on social protection accounted for 26.9% of GDP in the EU-27

CZECH REPUBLIC. 1. Main characteristics of the pension system

D R A F T A G E N D A

Closing assessment and overview of recommendations

Development of the Basic Living Standard Indicators in the Czech Republic

In-Depth Policy Analysis

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate F: Social statistics Unit F-5: Education, health and social protection Luxembourg, 23 March 2017 DOC SP-2017-06-Annex 2 https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/26803710-8227-45b9-8c56-6595574a4499 ESSPROS Expert Group (1486): https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/96adef83-8ee4-4c76-8c37-83502f932ec9 Working Group Social Protection 4-5 April 2017 Data validation: rules for the module on pension beneficiaries Item 6 of the Agenda Meeting of the Working Group Social Protection statistics Luxembourg, 4-5 April 2017 BECH Building Room Quetelet

ANNEX 2 OF ITEM 6 DATA VALIDATION RULES FOR THE MODULE ON PENSION BENEFICIARIES This document lists the validation rules for data collected through the ESSPROS module on pension beneficiaries. Note: In this document a cell refers to the actual value of a single observation (described by a set of dimensions). 0. Validation level 0 (format and file structure) Checks that fall within validation level 0 concern the format and the structure of the files transmitted to Eurostat. As the file structure is under discussion (see point 4 of the Working Group agenda) a detailed list will be provided at a later date. DICTIONARIES CHECK A number of dimensions are used to identify individual observations. Certain dimensions, such as those specifying the country and detailed classifications (see Appendix I of the ESSPROS methodology), are fixed according to predefined code lists (or dictionaries). The values used to specify fixed dimensions of the data must conform to the agreed values laid out in the respective code lists (or dictionaries) for each dimension. In the current data structure the coded dimensions are: Country, Item, and Scheme. Please note that period is a dimension identifying an observation but is not coded. When the new data structure (see item 5 of the agenda) is adopted these rules will be updated according to the new dimensions and associated code lists. 0.1. Country codes are valid entries in the country code list (dictionary) The country codes used must be one of the values in the country list. 0.1 Country codes used are defined in the country code lists (dictionary) _ Fatal ERROR 0.1: code for country not defined in the country_list. Examples: = GR Fatal error = FX Fatal error = CR Fatal error 2

0.2. Items codes are valid entries in the item code list (dictionary) The items codes used must be one of the values in the item list. 0.2 Item codes used are defined in the item code lists (dictionary) _ Fatal ERROR 0.2: code for item not defined in the item_list. Examples: = 1000001 Fatal error = 2000000 Fatal error = "1151111" Fatal error 0.3. Schemes codes are valid entries in the schemes code list (dictionary) The scheme codes used must be one of the values in the scheme list. 0.3 Scheme codes used are defined in the scheme code lists (dictionary) _ Fatal ERROR 0.3: code for item not defined in the scheme_list. Examples: = SCH1 Fatal error = allschemes Fatal error = "All Schemes" Fatal error 0.4. Flags are valid entries in the flags code list (dictionary) The flags used must correspond to those available in the flag code list ("b", "e", "p"). 0.4 Flags used are defined in the flag code list _ Fatal ERROR 0.4: code for flag used (dictionary) in cell is not defined in the flag_list. Examples: = 12 z Fatal error = 12 S Fatal error = - Fatal error 1. Validation level 1 (checks on the content of the file) A) Format and content of dimension identifiers 1.1. Cell contents are not negative The cell values must be 0 or positive. A negative value will generate a fatal error 1.1 Cell contents are positive or "0" _ Fatal ERROR 1.1: The value in cell cell is negative 3

1.2. Number of pension beneficiaries is an integer The number of pension beneficiaries should be an integer number. The cell values of the current questionnaires can take the form of a string because flags are concatenated to the end of the number of beneficiaries (without any space in between). Taking this into account, if the length of the cell value is "N": Cell value must be an integer if N=1. Sub-string of cell value from 1 to "N-1 must be an integer for N>1 Any cases where this does not hold will generate a fatal error. 1.2 Number of pension beneficiaries is an integer _ Fatal ERROR 1.2: The value in cell cell is not an integer. Examples: Cell value= 1.2 Fatal error Cell value= 1.2*3p Fatal error 1.3. Flags are correctly concatenated to the numeric values Flags are concatenated to the end of numerical values without any space in between. This rule is applicable only to the current data transmission format (Excel questionnaire). In the proposed file structure (discussed under item 5 of the Agenda), this rule will be obsolete. If the length of the cell value is "N" and cell value is not a number: Sub-string of cell value from 1 to "N-1 must be an integer and character "N" must be a non-numeric character (<> blank) for N>1 Any cases where this does not hold will generate a fatal error. 1.3 Flags are concatenated to the numeric values without any space _ Fatal ERROR 1.3: flag in cell cell is not correctly concatenated. Examples: = 12 e Fatal error = "12*e" Fatal error = "12@1" Fatal error 4

1.4 For each item and scheme the total number of beneficiaries is equal to the sum of data by gender. For each item and scheme (included Total schemes), the sum of the number of beneficiaries by gender must be equal to the total number of beneficiaries. 1.4 For the optional item e) and for each scheme the _ Fatal ERROR 1.4: sum of data by sum of data by gender = total number of gender for item and scheme beneficiaries doesn t sum up to the total The two following checks are conceptually the same. They differ only for the threshold. 1.5 For each item the total number of beneficiaries (Total schemes) is greater than or equal to the number of beneficiaries of the scheme with the largest value. For each item, the number of beneficiaries at Total scheme level is by definition <= to the sum of number of beneficiaries by scheme. This is due to the required elimination of double counting at Total scheme level in case a beneficiary receives the same kind of pension from two different schemes (double counting type 2). However the Total number of beneficiaries can t be < of the number of beneficiaries of any scheme. 1.5 - Fatal ERROR 1.5: Total number of The number of beneficiaries at all schemes beneficiaries for item is level for the item X has to be greater or equal smaller than the value for to the number of beneficiaries for the scheme item and scheme[i] with the largest number of beneficiaries. ItemX (All schemes)>= max(itemx (Scheme [i]) for i = 1 to n. of schemes 1.6 Integrity rules linking items are satisfied (Absolute value) The items in the code lists are linked by equations (integrity rules) that must be respected for data consistency (see list below). In the Pension beneficiaries module the operator linking the aggregated data and their components is not "=". In fact, due to the elimination of double counting, the aggregated data can be "<" or "=" to the sum of the components. If an equation is not satisfied, it can be due to the unavailability of one of the components for any reason or to an error in the data reported. This should be explained. Any absolute difference greater than 1 generates a warning. 1.6 The integrity rules defined on the items are satisfied (aggregate <= sum of components) Threshold for difference 1 Fatal ERROR 1.6: equation eq_number not satisfied for cell Absolute difference greater than 1 5

Examples (equations expressed with the current codes classification): 1000000 = 1120110 + 1130110 + 1140111 + 1160113 1000000 = 115200 1120110 + 1130110 + 1140111 + 1160113= 115121 115200 > 115121 Fatal error The integrity rules defined on the items used in the pension beneficiaries module are: Total pension beneficiaries <= Total pension beneficiaries in disability function + Total pension beneficiaries in old age function + Total pension beneficiaries in survivors' function + Total pension beneficiaries in unemployment function Total pension beneficiaries in disability function <= Disability pension beneficiaries + Beneficiaries receiving early retirement benefits due to reduced capacity to work Total pension beneficiaries in old age function <= Old-age pension beneficiaries + Anticipated old age pension beneficiaries + Partial pension beneficiaries Old-age pension beneficiaries <= Old-age pension beneficiaries NMT + Old-age pension beneficiaries MT Anticipated old age pension beneficiaries <= Anticipated old age pension beneficiaries NMT + Anticipated old age pension beneficiaries MT Partial pension beneficiaries <= Partial pension beneficiaries NMT + Partial pension beneficiaries MT Total pension beneficiaries in survivors' function <= Survivors' pension beneficiaries NMT + Survivors' pension beneficiaries MT Total pension beneficiaries in unemployment function <= Beneficiaries receiving early retirement benefits for labour market reasons NMT + Beneficiaries receiving early retirement benefits for labour market reasons MT DOUBLE COUNTING CHECKS Pension beneficiaries are defined as recipients of periodic cash benefits reported under the ESSPROS pension classifications identified in Appendix III of the ESSPROS manual. It is possible that individuals receive multiple pensions. In the ESSPROS pension beneficiaries module, the beneficiaries reported for any classification corresponding to a particular type of pension or group of pension types should relate to the number of beneficiaries and should not double count those who receive multiple pensions within the classification. The ESSPROS identifies 6 different types of such double counting. The following validation rules detect the treatment of the double counting. 1.7 Double counting type 1 in the data When more than one benefit is classified under a single type of pension (the same elementary item) recorded in one cell of a single scheme, the pensioners receiving more than one of the benefits should only be counted once. See Appendix III, paragraph 4.2, section A of the ESPROSS manual. This check generates a warning. 6

section of Quality Report (section 2.2 (a)) Item d (supplementary optional item) corresponds to the number of benefits by scheme and gender. This check is possible only when item d is transmitted. 1.7 Double counting type 1: Pensioners receiving more than one of the >0 Warning WARNING 1.7 : Double counting of Type 1 has been benefits classified under the same item are treated only counted once. item d -1160113-1140111-1130110-1120110 > 0 1.8 Double counting type 2 in the data Beneficiaries may receive the same type of pension (the same elementary item) from more than one scheme. This double counting has to be removed when reporting beneficiaries at all scheme level so that those pensioners who receive a specific type of pension from two or more schemes are only counted once. See Appendix III, paragraph 4.2, section B of the ESPROSS manual. This check generates a warning. section of Quality Report (section 2.2 (b)) 1.8 Double counting type 2: For item X the value at total schemes level is less than or equal to the sum of values at schemes level. ItemX (All schemes) <= ItemX (Scheme [i]) for i = 1 to n. of schemes _ Warning WARNING 1.8: Double counting of Type 2 has been treated Example: Item 1121111, 2 schemes Scheme 01 =5000 Scheme 02= 3000 Total = Scheme 01+ Scheme 02 = 2000 Warning 7

1.9 Double counting type 3 in the data Beneficiaries may receive both a non means-tested and means-tested version of a pension of a specific type. This double counting has to be treated when adding up the beneficiaries to derive the total number of beneficiaries receiving that type of pension. This shall be treated only at level of the corresponding category. See Appendix III, paragraph 4.2, section C of the ESPROSS manual. This check generates a warning. section of Quality Report (section 2.2 (c)). 1.9 Double counting type 3: _ Warning WARNING 1.9: Double Pensioners are receiving both a non meanstested and a means-tested version of a specific counting of Type 3 has been treated pension type. Category pension X < category pension X (NMT) + category pension X (MT) Example: 1121111 = 6000 1122111 = 2000 NMT+MT = 8000 1120111 = 7000 Warning 1.10 Double counting type 4 in disability function Beneficiaries may receive pensions from two or more pension benefits within the Disability function. Such beneficiaries should only be counted once in the total beneficiaries reported for the function as a whole. See Appendix III, paragraph 4.2, section D.1 of the ESPROSS manual. This check generates a warning. section of Quality Report (section 2.2 (d)). 1.10 Double counting 4: Pensioners are receiving _ Warning WARNING 1.10 Double pensions from two or more pension benefits within the disability function. counting of Type 4 has been treated in disability function 1120110 < 1120111+1120112 Examples: 1120111 = 5800 1120112 = 320 1120110 = 5800 Warning 8

1.11 Double counting type 4 in old age function Beneficiaries may receive pensions from two or more pension benefits within the Old age function. Such beneficiaries should only be counted once in the total beneficiaries reported for the function as a whole. See Appendix III, paragraph 4.2, section D.1 of the ESPROSS manual. This check generates a warning. section of Quality Report (section 2.2 (d)). 1.11 Double counting 4: Pensioners are receiving _ Warning WARNING 1.11 Double pensions from two or more pension benefits within the old age function. counting of Type 4 has been treated in old age function 1130110 < 1130111+1130112+1130113 Examples: 1130111 = 1720 1130112 = 120 1130113 = 0 1130110 = 1720 Warning 1.12 Double counting type 5 in the data The total number of beneficiaries receiving at least one pension classified within either the old age function or the survivors' function has to be calculated for the cell Total beneficiaries in old-age and survivors functions (item 1190110). Pensioners who simultaneously receive pensions reported within both functions should only be counted once. See Appendix III, paragraph 4.2, section D.2 of the ESPROSS manual. This check generates a warning. section of Quality Report (section 2.2 (d)). 1.12 Double counting type 5: _ Warning WARNING 1.12 Double In the cell Total beneficiaries in old-age and survivors functions (item 1190110) the counting of Type 5 has been treated between old age and beneficiaries simultaneously receiving survivors function pensions within both functions are only counted once. 1190110< 1130110+1140111 Examples: 1130110 = 100 1140110 = 250 1190110 =300 Warning 9

1.13 Double counting type 6 in the data The total number of beneficiaries receiving at least one pension of any type has to be calculated for the cell Total number of pension beneficiaries (item 1000000). Pensioners who simultaneously receive pensions reported under multiple functions should only be counted once. See Appendix III, paragraph 4.2, section D.2 of the ESPROSS manual This check generates a warning. section of Quality Report (section 2.2 (d)). 1.13 Double counting type 6: In the cell "Total number of pension beneficiaries" (item 1000000), the beneficiaries receiving more than one pension, no matter of which type, are counted only once. 1000000 < 1120110+1130110+1140111+1160113 _ Warning WARNING 1.13 There is a risk of double counting Type 6. Examples: 1120110 = 100 1130110 = 150 1140110 = 250 1160113 = 70 1000000 = 500 Warning Rules for the optional data by residence For more detailed information about the rules defined on optional data by residence please refer to the document DOC SP-2016-07-Annex 5. 1.14 The total number of pension beneficiaries is greater than or equal to the number of beneficiaries living outside the country The total number of pension beneficiaries should be greater than or equal than the number of pension beneficiaries living outside the country. 1.14 Item 1000000 >= Number of pension _ Warning WARNING 1.14: Total beneficiaries living outside the country number of pension (optional data e)) beneficiaries is less than number of pension beneficiaries living outside the country Some countries provide data on the number of beneficiaries living outside the country at the scheme level and by gender. In these cases, the following validation rules should be applied to the optional data. 10

1.15 The total number of beneficiaries is equal to the sum of data by gender For each scheme (including Total schemes) the sum of number of beneficiaries by gender must be equal to the total number of beneficiaries. For the optional data the Error severity is Warning (Fatal error for the mandatory data). 1.15 For each item and scheme the sum of data by gender = total number of beneficiaries _ Warning WARNING 1.15: sum of data by gender for item and scheme doesn t sum up to the total 1.16 The total number of beneficiaries (Total schemes) is greater than or equal to the number of beneficiaries of the scheme with the largest value The number of beneficiaries at Total scheme level is by definition <= to the sum of number of beneficiaries by scheme. This is due to the required elimination of double counting at Total scheme level in case a beneficiary receives the same kind of pension from two different schemes (double counting type 2). However, the Total number of beneficiaries can t be < of the number of beneficiaries of any scheme. For the optional data the Error severity is Warning (Fatal error for the mandatory data). 1.16 - Warning WARNING 1.16: Total The number of beneficiaries at all schemes number of beneficiaries for level for the optional item e) has to be greater item is smaller than the value or equal to the number of beneficiaries for the for item and scheme[i] scheme with the largest number of beneficiaries. Item e) (All schemes)>= max(item e) (Scheme [i]) for i = 1 to n. of schemes 11

Validation level 2 (intra-domain, intra-source) 2.1 Time series checks: outliers detection The time series checks are performed at Scheme level. The range of years analysed in the time series check can varies according to the tool used. A 4 years range seems a reasonable choice. The current threshold is roughly fixed to 10%. As for the core system data a definition of thresholds for each specific item (possibly by country) should be identified. If the thresholds is not respected it should be explained. This check generates a warning. 2.1 Time series checks: outliers detection Warning ERROR 2.1: cell is a 10 % potential outlier 2.2 Revision checks: compare the revised values with those previously transmitted The revision checks are performed at scheme level. Any cases where a value within a scheme is revised by more than the threshold should be explained. The current threshold is roughly fixed to 10%. This check generates a warning. 2.2 Revision checks: compare the revised values Warning with those previously transmitted 10 % ERROR 2.2: Value in cell is significantly different to data provided previously. 12