Gillett School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Similar documents
Sheboygan Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

Oakfield School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

School District of West De Pere Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

Marathon School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

School District of Somerset Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

Beaver Dam Unified School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

Freedom Area School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

Tomah Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2015

School District of Horicon Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

School District of Slinger Community Survey Report

Barneveld School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2017

Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Burlington Area School District Community Survey Results. Winter 2016

Third Draft Budget March 5, 2019

Muskego Norway Schools Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

76% The comprehensive solution put forward by the Community Steering Committee addresses a wide variety of needs at the high school:

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

Total Community Parent Student Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %

Understanding the Costs: Frequently Asked Questions

2016 Bond Steering Committee Meeting

West Bend School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Third Draft Budget March 6, 2018

Franklin Township Public Schools PRELIMINARY BUDGET PRESENTATION BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING MARCH 23, 2017

Frequently asked questions on the Ridgewood Public School Budget. 2. Why does the Board approve a preliminary budget?

PROPOSITION FARMINGTON SCHOOLS. April 8, 2014 Bond Issue

Downtown Cincinnati Perceptions Survey Results

Understanding the K-12 General Education Funding Program

BUDGET UPDATE PART II. Board of Education Meeting March 26, 2018

Engagement Study February 2014

Financial Plan

PORTA CUSD Bluejay Rd, Petersburg IL Tel Fax PORTA AT A GLANCE FY 2018

SPOTLIGHT FORSYTH COUNTY BOND REFERENDA. Three bonds totaling $430 million. Taxpayers should get the facts. CITY AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT #481

Budget Development for Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011

2016 School Budget Vote Exit Survey Report

Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative Action Plan

MASTER SCHEDULING GUIDE TO CREATING CREDIT RECOVERY SECTIONS IN PERIODS 50-75

Continuing Education Employee Perception Survey. Briefing. Prepared by: SDCCD Office of Institutional Research and Planning September 4, 2009

Summary of Significant Forecast Assumptions Amanda-Clearcreek Local School District July 1, 2017 June 30, 2022 October 2017.

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

ROCKWALL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. Official Budget Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2019

Advertising in this newsletter does not imply endorsement by Poudre School District.

FY 19 SCHOOL DEPARTMENT OPERATING BUDGET Annual Town Meeting: March 10, 2018

Chapter 17 School Cash Catalog

Montville Township Public Schools

BUDGET MESSAGE. June 15, 2017

Introduction. Board Members

COD and Studentloans.gov (SLG)- Optimize your Processing PASFAA October, 2014

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM

LITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Executive Administration. Office of Community Engagement

North Tonawanda City School District NT SPIRIT BUDGET EDITION

Budget. Draft #1

School Board s Advertised Budget Fiscal Year 2014

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Dollars. sense. 2015/2016 Adopted Budget

COLUMBUS MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Centennial School District Budget Message April 19, CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2017/2018 BUDGET MESSAGE April 19, 2017

PARK HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Galloway Township Public Schools

Right direction 33% 34% Wrong track 57% 56% Neither 3% 2% Don t know / Refused 7% 7%

Franklin Township Public Schools FINAL BUDGET PRESENTATION BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING - APRIL 27, 2017

National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community,

Burbank Unified School District Issues Survey

Governing Board Guide to Elementary School Budgets

Community Survey 2014

OXNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE R OXNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX RATE STATEMENT BOND MEASURE R

I. Study Background. A. Purpose of Study. B. General Methodology

Community Survey 2017

Cherry Creek School District Profile of Student-Based Budgeting for Schools FY

Little Known Avenues for Funding Technology

First Fridays with the Budget Office. November 3, 2017

Loveland City Schools FY Revenue

PROFILE INFORMATION. Wellsville

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

What Matters Most? A Community Forum to Discuss School District Funding Priorities

Key Considerations for Referendum Planning

ADOPTED BUDGET

Grace Period Counseling for Student Loan Repayment Success FAFSAA 2016

Coffee Talk March 9 th, 2017

WESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY POLLING INSTITUTE 2018 Massachusetts Statewide Survey October 10-27, 2018

Queensbury. Union Free School District School Budget Vote Exit Survey Report

Back to Table of Contents Total Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %

BUDGET. Summary. Successful Learners Strengthening Our Community. Mount Vernon High School. Madison Elementary. Mount Baker Middle School

Budget General Information (characteristics of district) Supplemental Information for Tables in Summary of Expenditures

TOWN OF ACTON, MAINE SCHOOL BUDGET FY SPECIAL TOWN MEETING WARRANT TO ROBERT ANDERSON A CONSTABLE IN THE TOWN OF ACTON, MAINE - YORK, SS

CONTRACT FOR ENROLLMENT Financial Agreement for 18 19

2015 State Fair Opinion Poll Minnesota State Senate Survey Results

2008 Cecil County Public Opinion Survey Results Summary

BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR Working Together, Achieving Excellence

Budget General Information (characteristics of district) Supplemental Information for Tables in Summary of Expenditures

Plainedge Public Schools Budget Presentation

Stetson University Internal Communication Survey. May 2018

Updated 20 th January Annual School Fees

La Plata County Ballot Measure Poll May 2015

Recommendation Report

Thornton Annual Citizen survey

Proposed Budget

PARK HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT INFORMATIONAL SECTION

Transcription:

Gillett School District Community Survey Results Spring 2018

Survey Summary The survey was conducted in April of 2018. Residents within the District were mailed a paper survey. Each survey included a unique survey access code for those who preferred to take the survey online. Total responses = 396 (175 paper) Participation rate = 21%

Respondent Information

What is your age? 25% 23% 25% 25% 20% 15% 13% 13% 10% 5% 1% 0% 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-64 65 and older

In which municipality do you reside? 35% 30% 30% 25% 22% 20% 18% 15% 10% 5% 11% 8% 5% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0%

Is your primary residence in the Gillett School District? 13% 1% 86% Yes No Don't know

Are you an employee of the Gillett School District? 23% 77% Yes (n=92) No (n=351)

Do you currently have children attending the Gillett School District? 35% 65% Yes (n=138) No (n=258)

If you have school-aged children, what school(s) do they attend? 60% 50% 50% 40% 35% 35% 30% 20% 10% 0% 11% 5% 3% 2% 1%

Please mark ALL other relationships you have with the Gillett School District: 60% 50% 43% 40% 30% 29% 24% 20% 18% 12% 10% 0% Graduate of Gillett School District Parent/guardian of Gillett School District graduate(s) Grandparent/relative of Gillett School District student(s) Volunteer in the Gillett School District Parent/guardian of child(ren) younger than elementary school age

Overall, what impact do you believe the quality of the Gillett School District has on your home value? (All Respondents) 60% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 20% 14% 10% 0% Positive impact Little to no impact Negative impact Do not own a home in the District 6%

Student Preparation

How well are we doing in each of the following Item areas? Great (4), Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (1) Staff Parents Non-Parents Maintaining school facilities 3.14 3.15 3.08 Providing a safe and welcoming learning environment 3.43 3.28 2.98 Building pride in our community 3.20 3.14 2.92 Delivering a high-quality educational experience 3.43 3.20 2.88 Hiring and retaining high-quality faculty and staff 3.21 2.98 2.80 Providing career and college preparation 3.21 3.03 2.76 Developing student character 3.14 2.99 2.75 Preparing students for life after high school 3.15 2.98 2.71 Keeping the public informed 3.08 2.86 2.64 Spending tax dollars wisely 3.27 2.77 2.51

Overall, how satisfied are you with the Gillett School District? (All Respondents) 75% 60% 50% 45% 30% 29% 15% 8% 3% 10% 0% Very satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Very unsatisfied No opinion

District Communications

How would you prefer to receive information Email Phone notifications District newsletter: Tiger Times Text messaging Parent/Teacher conferences Facebook District/school website Infinite Campus Open house Electronic newsletters Times Herald Teacher websites School Board agendas and minutes Parent-Teacher Organization (PTO) meetings Oconto County Reporter Attending School Board meetings YouTube Radio Other Twitter Blogs from the District? 10% 21% 4% 5% 18% 21% 1% 23% 12% 19% 5% 18% 18% 1% 15% 12% 13% 2% 8% 7% 18% 4% 5% 1% 2% 2% 9% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% 55% 50% 45% 42% 37% 36% 55% 71% 82% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Non-Parents Parents

Overall, how would you rate the District s communication over the last year? 100% 80% 60% 40% 49% 32% 36% 35% Parents Non-Parents 20% 11% 13% 4% 20% 0% Effective Somewhat effective Not effective No opinion

How effective is the District's website in providing timely and meaningful information? 100% 80% 60% 60% Parents 40% 33% 34% Non-Parents 20% 16% 17% 17% 16% 7% 0% Effective Somewhat effective Not effective No opinion

How often do you visit the District s website? 100% 80% 60% 60% Parents 40% 32% 24% 28% 20% 17% 12% 9% 14% 4% 0% 0% One or two times a yearmonthly Weekly Daily Never Non-Parents

Why do you visit the District's website? Search for upcoming events/view calendar 76% 80% To view sports/co-curricular schedules 33% 46% Access staff contact information Access Infinite Campus parent portal/check grades 3% 22% 45% 41% Non-Parents To view lunch menu Review School Board agendas/minutes 5% 30% 19% 23% Parents Check lunch account balance 0% 23% Other 10% 10% To view District policies, bylaws and guidelines 6% 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Do you follow the Gillett School District on any of the following forms of social media? 100% 80% 58% Parents 60% 40% 28% Non-Parents 20% 0% Facebook

Financial Background

Declining Tax Mill Rate The Gillett School District has worked hard to control costs while still providing high-quality programs and services for our students. Since 2014, the District s tax levy, which is used to calculate property taxes, has decreased by 34%. Low Tax Mill Rate The graph below compares the 2018 tax mill rates with those of neighboring school districts. The Gillett School District is one of the lowest in the area and 21% lower than the state average.

In August of 2016, a referendum to support school district operations failed to win voter approval. Since that time, in an effort to maintain programs and services for students, the District: Utilized funding from the District s fund balance, which reduced the fund balance from 41% to 22% of annual expenditures Reduced building and program budgets Reduced staffing levels and cut costs by sharing staff with neighboring school districts Changed insurance providers and coverage for employees Reduced busing and other transportation costs Delayed the replacement of District vehicles and maintenance projects including roof and parking lot replacement Increased energy efficiencies/reduced utility costs Secured new grants and federal funding sources for staffing and educational programs Even with these reductions, a budget shortfall of $600,000 is projected for each of the next 3 years. We are concerned what additional cuts will mean to educating our students, retaining high-quality staff and our ability to maintain our facilities. Under current state law, a referendum is required for the District to increase revenue to fund school operations.

What advice would you give the District? (Residents Only) 100% 89% 80% 60% 40% 55% 59% 45% 37% 27% 28% 28% 20% 17% 4% 4% 7% 0% Hold an operating referendum to maintain programs/services Make further cuts to programs and services to balance the budget Not sure/need more information All Residents Staff Parents Non-Parents

Budget Reduction Options

Item If an operational referendum fails, consider which of the following the District should address to save money: Yes (10), No (1) Should the District change to an every other day 4- year-old kindergarten program to save money? Should the District increase class sizes or create multigrade classes to save money? All Residents Staff Residents Parent Residents Non-Parent Residents 6.55 5.02 6.00 7.24 4.64 1.87 3.70 5.89 Should the District increase the athletic/activity fees? 5.54 4.69 5.60 5.73 Should the District reduce busing services to save money? Should the District postpone curriculum updates to save money? Should the District reduce the number of athletic/activity offerings? Should the District delay implementing the technology plan to save money? Should the District decrease course offerings to save money? 4.37 4.55 3.22 4.96 4.15 4.50 3.09 4.65 3.52 2.25 2.70 4.39 3.94 3.07 3.57 4.36 1.98 1.21 1.37 2.54

Funding to Support Operations

The following options have been developed for community feedback: OPTION 1: Hold a $600,000 operating referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs/services for each of the next 3 years. OPTION 2: Hold a $750,000 operating referendum, allowing the District to maintain all current programs/services AND address critical safety/security and maintenance needs for each of the next 3 years. The District has identified updates that would improve the safety and security of our school including creating more secure building entrances, increasing the number of security cameras and updating the school s emergency communication/ public address system. Additionally, critical building maintenance, including replacing roof sections and windows, as well as vehicle replacement has been postponed due to limited funds. OPTION 3: Do not hold an operating referendum. Make significant cuts to programs and services. The following table shows tax impact for the two referendum amounts.

Which option would you support? (Residents Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 49% 73% 64% 35% OPTION 2: Hold a $750,000 operating referendum, allowing the District to maintain all current programs/services AND address critical safety/security and maintenance needs for each of the next 3 years. 17% 20% 16% 17% 19% OPTION 1: Hold a $600,000 operating referendum, allowing the District to maintain current programs/services for each of the next 3 years. 2% 6% 31% OPTION 3: Do not hold any operating referendum. Make significant cuts to programs and services. 15% 14% 17% 5% I'm not sure/need more information All Residents Staff Parents Non-Parents

Thank you!