INTRODUCTION. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("UBER" or "Defendant") pursuant to North Carolina's Unfair and

Similar documents
Case 3:17-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Filing # E-Filed 05/23/ :26:50 PM

8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Case No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.

The plaintiff complaining of defendants, alleges and says: INTRODUCTION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

Filing # E-Filed 12/15/ :11:41 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv HZ Document 23-1 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#: 87

Case 2:17-cv JMV-SCM Document 1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Filing # E-Filed 04/07/ :06:24 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, v. Case No. COMPLAINT

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT COMPLAINT. 17 RCW , RCW , and RCW The Attorney General brings this

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. IN AND FOR DUVAL f} C A. Plaintiff, Case No. COMPLAINT

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

Case 2:12-cv CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

MAR 2 Z Los Angeles, CA Telephone: (21 3) Facsimile: (2 1 3)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. ) Civil Action No.

Case 2:16-cv JEO Document 1 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:18-cv JAW Document 1 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff R.J. Zayed ( Plaintiff or Receiver ), through his undersigned counsel

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JUDGMENT

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Angelo Bottoni, Paul Roberts, Tracie Serrano, and Shawnee Silva, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.

Case 1:16-cv JFM Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/18 Page 1 of 13

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCTION. 1. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, by and through )mey GemeB

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Civil Action No. 09-CV-367

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:16-cv ROS Document 1 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 20

COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Cyber Risks & Insurance

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv PWG Document 1 Filed 08/21/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv DW *SEALED* Document 3 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 23

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:16-cv MCR-CJK Document 18 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Privacy and Data Breach Protection Modular application form

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/31/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/31/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Cyber, Data Risk and Media Insurance Application form

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.: JUDGE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/07/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2016 EXHIBIT B

Defendant. Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants

{,US 18 1S N. Figueroa, 16th floor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ECF CASE DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Negligence

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. Plaintiff ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly

Case 1:18-cv MKB-RML Document 5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 14

13 JArl Jr. ~N 1/= 25

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/14/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION RALEIGH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

ORIGINAL. -l^ K CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2 '7 L'I FEB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 1:13-cv PLM Doc #8 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#44

Case 1:16-cv SMV-WPL Document 1 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:16-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 9

IN CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

Case 1:12-cv ELH Document 1 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 59 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO th Street Boulder, Colorado THE STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. John W. Suthers, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/02/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv LRH-WGC Document 11 Filed 08/16/11 Page 1 of 11

2: 16-cv GMN-NJK

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/03/18 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case: 5:12-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/15/12 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ELECTRONIC RECORDING VENDOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Transcription:

1 g,...\1\', \ \llc I l.,tu U STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. JOSHUAH. STEIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. Plaintiff, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT ~ ~., INTRODUCTION l.r NOW COMES the Plaintiff, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, by and through its Attorney General, JOSHUA H. STEIN, and brings this action against Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("UBER" or "Defendant" pursuant to North Carolina's Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, N.C.G.S. 75-1.1, et seq. FOLLOWS: PLAINTIFF COMPLAINS OF DEFENDANT AND ALLEGES AND SAYS AS THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff is the State of North Carolina, acting on relation of its Attorney General, Joshua H. Stein, who brings this action pursuant to authority found in Chapters 75 and 114 of the North Carolina General Statutes. 2. Defendant is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1455 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94103. C-,':,'", ~:.,,, r..; -o '.'; 1

3. As used herein, any reference to "UBER" or "Defendant" shall mean UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., including all of its officers, directors, affiliates, subsidiaries and divisions, predecessors, successors and assigns doing business in the United States. COMMERCE 4. UBER was at all times relevant hereto, engaged in trade and commerce in the State of North Carolina as defined in North Carolina's Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, N.C.G.S. 75-1.1, et seq., in that UBER is a technology company that provides a ride hailing mobile application that connects drivers with riders, including in North Carolina. Riders hail and pay drivers using the UBER platform. BACKGROUND 5. UBER's Privacy Policy recognizes that users trust and rely on it to safeguard their personal information: "When you use UBER, you trust us with your information. We are committed to keeping that trust." In this regard, the frequently asked questions on UBER's Privacy Policy webpage states, "We take the security of your data seriously. UBER uses technical safeguards like encryption, authentication, fraud detection, and secure software development to protect your information. We also have an extensive team of data security and privacy experts working around the clock to prevent theft, fraud, or abuse of your information." 6. In November 2016, hackers contacted UBER to inform them that they had accessed and acquired UBER data and to demand payment in exchange for deleting the data. 7. UBER was able to determine the security vulnerability that the hackers had exploited and eliminate the vulnerability. 8. In December 2016, the hackers deleted the data. 2

9. Among the data the hackers acquired was personal information pursuant to the North Carolina Identity Theft Protection Act, N.C.G.S. 75-60, et seq.: name and driver's license information pertaining to some UBER drivers. 10. The hackers violated the North Carolina Identity Theft Protection Act, N.C.G.S. 75-60, et seq. with respect to that personal information. 11. UBER did not disclose the data breach to affected UBER drivers in 2016 when the breach was discovered. 12. In August 2017, UBER named a new CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi. 13. In September 2017, Khosrowshahi was informed that UBER had suffered a data breach and ordered an investigation into the data breach, hiring a third party cyber security provider to conduct the investigation. 14. The cyber security provider verified the 2016 data breach, and, on November 21, 2017, UBER notified regulators and consumers of the 2016 breach. 15. UBER offered affected drivers free credit monitoring and identity theft protection. COUNT I - UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT 16. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference as if the same were fully set forth. 17. UBER failed to implement and maintain reasonable security practices to protect the sensitive personal information it maintains for its users. 18. UBER failed to disclose a data breach to affected users. 19. UBER represented to users that UBER protects the sensitive personal information of its users, when in fact the hackers were able to gain access to some UBER user personal information. 3

20. UBER's failures to maintain reasonable security practices and protect personal information, and its representation that personal information was protected was likely to mislead consumers. 21. Defendant has therefore engaged in unfair or deceptive acts and practices in violation of North Carolina's Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, N.C.G.S. 75-1.1, et seq. COUNT II - IDENTITY THEFT PROTECTION ACT 22. The preceding paragraphs are incorporated herein by reference as if the same were fully set forth. 23. UBER is an owner or licenser of personal information pursuant to the North Carolina Identity Theft Protection Act, N.C.G.S. 75-760, et seq. 24. The UBER information the hackers acquired included personal information pursuant to the North Carolina Identity Theft Protection Act, N.C.G.S. 75-760, et seq. 25. UBER violated N.C.G.S. 75-65 in that UBER suffered a breach of the security of its system data and failed to notify affected North Carolina residents without unreasonable delay. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, State of North Carolina, respectfully requests that: A. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 75-1.1, the Court permanently enjoin and restrain UBER, their agents, employees, and all other persons and entities, corporate or otherwise, in active concert or participation with any of them, from engaging in false, misleading, or deceptive practices in the handling of personal information as it pertains to UBER's ride hailing mobile application. 4

B. The Court fashion equitable relief to cure UBER's deceptive practices; C. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 75-16.1, the Defendant be ordered to pay costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the State in connection with the investigation and litigation of this matter; and D. The Court grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary or appropriate to remedy the effects ofuber's unlawful trade practices. Respectfully submitted this the 26th day of September, 2018. JOSHUAH. STEIN Attorney General ~ Kihiberley A. D' Arruda Special Deputy Attorney General N.C. Department of Justice P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602-0629 Telephone: (919 716-6013 Facsimile: (919 716-6050 Email: kdarruda@ncdoj.gov NC State Bar No.: 25271 5