STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE

Similar documents
STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE

STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE

In this petition short point is involved which is. with respect to the petitioner s right to get the benefit of

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 06 of 2018

Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi. OA No.571/2017

$~5-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision: April 29, W.P.(C) 1535/2012. versus W.P.(C) 2348/2012.

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 11 of Thursday, this the 15th day of March, 2018

A very simple but ticklish issue arises in this writ. petition. The issue is whether a person retiring from a higher grade

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, UCKNOW. Original Application No. 166 of Tuesday, this the 13 th day of March, 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VINOD VERMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS

CWP No of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. versus

T. A. NO.01/2015 THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 HON BLE JUSTICE N. K. AGARWAL, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

.1. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM BENCH. Original Application No.180/00797/2017. HON'BLE Mr.E.K.BHARAT BHUSHAN, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 221 of Tuesday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.-

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1045 of 2014

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR. TA No.1139 of 2010 (arising out of C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus

INDIAN RAILWAYS TECHNICAL SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION (Estd. 1965, Regd. No.1329, Website )

$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7131/2015 % Judgment dated 29 th July, versus

4. The Officer in charge, Madras Engineer Group Record Office Madras Engineering Group Sivanchetty Garden (PO) Post Box No.4201, Bangalore

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Date of decision: 7th March, LPA No. 741/2011

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1989 of 2012

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 324 of Friday, this the 09 th day of February, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT Judgment delivered on W.P.

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A. No. 87 of 2014

Indian Employees [ Judgment - 68 ] NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 199 of Thursday, this the 30 th day of August, 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 3598 of 2013

No. 38/37/08-P&PW (A) Government of India Ministry of Personnel, PG & Pensions Department of Pension & Pensioners' Welfare OFFICE MEMORANDUM

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Decided on GROUP 4 SECURITAS GUARDING LTD. Versus AND. Versus

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) No.236 of 2018

, Other income Profit from operations before finance costs and

OF AUDITED STANDALONE FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED MARCH

FAQ ABOUT CPF-GPF ISSUE

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 537 of Friday, this the 16 th day of November, 2018

THE INDIAN JURIST

BEFORE THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DLEHI ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 655 OF 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A. No.23 of 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.360 of 2016 (Arising from the SLP(Civil) No.

Petition No. 816 of 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Transferred Application No of Monday this the 8th day of May 2017

No:- AIBSNLEA/CHQ/CMD/ Dated

ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL EXCISE GAZETTED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

CASE No. 103 of CASE No. 104 of 2016

it has been received or not. We have heard Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant herein. She has brought t

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No.12711/2009. % Date of Decision : Through Mr. Rajat Gaur, Adv.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. W.P (C ) No. 5562/2002. Judgment reserved on: October 05, 2006

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF Versus. The State of Bihar & Ors. Etc...

K.J.S. Buttar Vs Union of India and Anr (Civil Appeal No of 2006) MARCH 31, 2011 [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ] SERVICE LAW: ARMED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of decision : 26 th November, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. Through Mr.P.K.

STATEMENT OF AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 (` in crores) SL NO. PARTICULARS QUARTER ENDED

2009 NTN 40) [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]

FORM NO 21 (See Rule 102 (1) ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOLKATA APPLICATION NO: O.A. 10 OF 2011 THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013

Case No. 129 of Shri V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member

Decided on: 08 th October, 2010

, , Other income Profit from ordinary activities before finance costs and

AUDITED STANDALONE FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VERSUS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.9365 OF 2017 VERSUS WITH

STATEMENT OF AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 (` in crores)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 969/2014

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5636/2010. versus W.P.

Additional Pension on the basis of Contribution over and above Wage Limit of either Rs.5,000/- or Rs.6,500/- per Month.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD. Judgment reserved on Judgment delivered on Income Tax Appeal No.

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 2952 of 2012

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.62 of 2014

Public Interest Litigation Petitions filed by AIFTP & Associate Members

DETAILS OF STATUTORY CREDITORS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Fertiliser Association Of India... vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 March, 2015

STATEMENT OF AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2017

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus

Pension Related Circulars/ Orders

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 633 of Friday, this the 18 th day of January, 2019

SUPREME COURT RULING (INCOME TAX)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

DLF Limited Regd. Office: Shopping Mall 3rd Floor, Arjun Marg, Phase I DLF City, Gurgaon (Haryana), India

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : FINANCE ACT, 1994 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 4456/2012 & C.M.No.9237/2012( for stay)

ITA No. 140 of had been sold on , had been handed over to him. The assessee furnished the desired information and documents, including

Versus P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR This writ application has been filed for the following. reliefs:

Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench. OA No.2461/2012. Reserved on: Pronounced on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Ex F.A 7/2011. Reserved on : Date of Decision :

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

VERSUS M/S. BHAGAT CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD... Respondent. VERSUS M/S. M.R.G. PLASTIC TECHNOLOGIES AND ORS... Respondent

REVISIONAL APPLICATION NO ) & 122 OF 2011 M/S. KHADI GRAMODYOG DEVELOPMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF JULY 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos /2010. Date of Hearing:

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

BEFORE THE CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 ISSN

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved On: 3 rd August, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 6 th August, W.P.(C) NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO.

REPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision : December 06, 2010 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

IN THE ITAT BANGALORE BENCH C. Vinay Mishra. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. IT Appeal No. 895 (Bang.) of s.p. no. 124 (Bang.

Transcription:

STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON 01.07.2 COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE / Chief Communication Engineer, N.E. Railway, (Rtd.) Ite m HEARD BY 1 CAT-PB Delhi PETITION NO. & YEAR OA 1165 / 2011 LEAD PETITIONER Pratap Narain & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP NEXT DATE FIXED FOR HEARI NG 25.07.2 REMARKS IN BRIEF Case is for modified parity plus full pension on 20 years of service w.e.f. 1.1.2006. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12. Copy of Counter received on 17.12.12 and four weeks time was allowed for submission of Rejoinder. In the meanwhile, MOP,DOP&PW vide OM No. 38 /37 / 08- P&PW(A) dated 28.01.13 has unilaterally issued orders accepting fixation of revised pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band corresponding to the Table from which a pensioner had retired but prospectively i. e. from 24.09.12. Two issues are still remaining to be settled, namely, arrears from 1.1.06 and full pension at 20 years of service as per Cabinet approved Resolution dated 29.08.08. 2 CAT-PB Delhi 3 CAT-PB Delhi OA 2165 / 2011 OA 247 of 2012 KR Srinivasan & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP 25.07.2 17 Petitioners 25.07.2 Same as for item 1 above. Same as for item 1 above. 1 P age

4 Lucknow HC Ser.Ben.20 3 / 2010 s29 UP Officers 15.07.2 The case is for modified parity i.e. revision of pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre revised pay scale from which a pensioner had retired, in terms of Resolution dated 29.08.08, effective 1.1.2006. Petitioners are pre 2006 Pensioners belonging All India Service Officers of Govt. of U.P. retired from pre revised pay scale of Rs. 18,400-22,400. The U.P. Govt. implemented SCPC Report with certain modifications and issued G.O. No. Sa/3/1358 /Das-2010 dated 19.07.2010 fixing their revised pension at Rs. 26,500 w.e.f. 1.1.2006. The Pensioners grieance is that thier pension shold have been fixed at Rs. 27,350 w.e.f. 1.1.2006. The heard the case last on 1.7.2, when as asked for by the earlier, UOI submitted a copy of the SCPC Report through a detailed affidavit. The is likely to hear the case again in two week's time. 2 P age

5 Delhi HC WP(C)335 9/ 2010 s29,s26 Ex.ParaMil. No further date fixed for hearing so far as per website till 01.07.1 3. The case is for modified parity i.e. revision of pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre revised pay scale from which a pension had retired, in terms of Resolution dated 29.08.08, effective 1.1.2006. MOP,DOP&PW vide OM No. 38 /37 / 08-P&PW(A) dated 28.01.13 has unilaterally issued orders accepting fixation of revised pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band plus grade pay corresponding to the Table concerning to pre revised pay scale from which pensioner had retired effective 24.9.12. Issue remains to be settled is for arrears from 1.1.06 as per Cabinet approved Resolution dated 29.08.08. 3 P age

6 Supreme Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009 SPS Vains, Major General & Ors. 29.07.1 3 This case is for grant of Modified Parity in terms of MOP, DOP Resolution dated 29.8.2008, after including the same in Special Instructions. Petitioners are pre 2006 retirees Major Generals. MOD vide letter No. 1(11)/2012-D(Pen Policy) dated 17.01.13 has already stepped their revised pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band 4 plus grade pay and MSP, all corresponding table of pre revised pay scale from which they retired but w.e.f. 24.9.2012 and NOT 1.1.2006. Issue remains to be settled is for arrears from 1.1.06, the date of implementation of SCPC Report. 7 Supreme Civil Appeal 2966 / 2011 U0I Vs SPS Vains Mj. General & Ors 29.07.1 3 This case is same as CP(C) No.64 of 2009 except that in this case Petitioners are UOI & Ors. and Respondents are Pensioners. Issue remains to be settled is for arrears from 1.1.06, the date of implementation of SCPC Report. Both cases are being heard together by the hon.ble Supreme. 4 P age

8 Supreme Civil Appeal 8875-8876 of 2011. U0I & Ors.Vs. Vinod Kumar Jain & Ors (Avtar Singh) 09.07.13 The case is for modified parity i.e. revision of pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre revised pay scale from which a pension had retired, in terms of Resolution dated 29.08.08, effective 1.1.2006. AFT has given Judgment in favour of Pensioners but UOI has gone in appeal to Supreme. In the meanwhile, MOD vide letter No. 1(11)/2012-D(Pen Policy) dated 17.01.13 has unilaterally issued orders accepting fixation of revised pension at 50% of sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band corresponding to the Table but prospectively i.e. from 24.09.12. Issue remains to be settled is for arrears from 1.1.06, the date of implementation of SCPC Report. 9 Supreme Civil Appeal 5367-5368 OF 2005 Principal Sec.(F & P), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Vs. A.P. Pensioners Samaj. 19.07.1 3 Three Judge Bench Matter. 5 P age

10 Delhi HC WPC No. 4572 of 2012 All India S30 Pensioners Association Vs. UOI 02.07.2 Full parity case wherein writ, order or direction sought are : (a) setting aside the impugned judgment dated 6 th March, 2012 passed by the Hon ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.937 of 2010; (b) calling for the records of the case from the Respondent Authorities; (c ) granting the reliefs prayed for by the Petitioners in their Original Application No.937 of 2010 filed before the Hon ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi; and Judgment thereof. 11 CAT- PB/Delhi Contempt No.158 of 2012 CG SAG (S29) Pensioners Association, Shri Satish Verma, Rtd.CE Vs. Shri RC Mishra, Sec. DOP, MOP,GOI. and Shri Sumit Bose, Sec.DOE,MO F,GOI. 07.08.2 This Petition is against noncompliance of orders passed by CAT-PB while giving Judgment in case of OA 0655/2010 with other OAs. In view of IR granted by Delhi HC on 21.5.12, hon.ble on 30.5.12 closed the case with liberty to move application for revival of CP as per the Orders of hon.ble Delhi HC. Accordingly, after the dismisal of UOI Petition in Delhi HC, the revival application was put up which was heard on 24.5.13 and 28.5.13 and orders for isuue of notices to respondents were passed. 6 P age

12 Supreme SLP (Civil) 19784 of 2 Haryana Viduat Prasaran Nigam Ltd & Ors Vs R K Agarwal and Ors Date of listing for hearing for admissi on is not fixed till updatin g on 1.7.13 This SLP is againsst Punjab and Haryana High Judgment in case of CWP No. 19641 of 2009 R K Agarwal &Ors. Vs. HVPN Ltd & Ors. dated 21.12.2012. 7 P age