Local 25 S.E.I.U. and Participating Employers Pension Plan Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of October 1, 2014 under IRC Section 432

Similar documents
Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of January 1, 2015 under IRC Section 432

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of January 1, 2014 under IRC Section 432

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of January 1, 2016 under IRC Section 432

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of January 1, 2018 under IRC Section 432

Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of June 1, 2017 under IRC Section 432

Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of June 1, 2018 under IRC Section 432

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2012

Review of October 1, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Results

International Union of Operating Engineers Local 487 Pension Trust Fund Actuarial Valuation and Review as of April 1, 2014

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2010

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, Copyright 2009

National. as of December 31, this report may not be applicable for other purposes.

Automotive Industries Pension Plan

Special Study to Provide Adopted Retirement Benefits for County General Tier 4 and County Safety Tier 4 Employees. Copyright 2012

The Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles

SEIU Affiliates Officers and Employees Pension Plan

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

SEIU National Industry Pension Fund

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund

Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan

The Water and Power Employees Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan

The Water and Power Employees Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan

Copyright 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund Withdrawal Liability Valuation as of December 31, 2014

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2014

City of Orlando Police Officers' Pension Fund

Fire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

Proposed New Tiers of Benefit for New Entrants Based on Proposals from the City (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2011

Copyright 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund

Fresno County Employees Retirement Association

CITY OF BARTLETT, TENNESSEE RETIREMENT PLAN. Results of Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2016

Proposed New Tier of Benefit for New Entrants Based on Union Proposal (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2011

The Water and Power Employees Retirement, Disability and Death Benefit Insurance Plan

Imperial County Employees Retirement System

City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan

Proposed New Tier of Benefit for New Entrants Based on Union Proposal (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2011

August 13, Segal Consulting, a Member of The Segal Group, Inc. By: JB/hy

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Employees Retirement System

Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Insured Lives Death Benefit Fund

City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation and Review as of October 1, 2016

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of June 30, 2009

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Insured Lives Death Benefit Fund for Noncontributing Members

City of Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension Plan

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2012

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of June 30, 2009

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan

City of Holyoke Retirement System Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2016

Employees' Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth Revised Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2014

Proposed New Tiers of Benefit for New Entrants (Pension Plan and Retiree Medical Plan) Copyright 2010

Orange County Employees Retirement System

Re: Actuarial Impact Statement for City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan Pension Reform

100 Montgomery Street Suite 500 San Francisco, CA T

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority

Sacramento County Employees Retirement System (SCERS)

Ventura County Employees Retirement Association

Re: City of Sarasota General Employees Pension Fund Lower Investment Return to 6.9%

San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Association

Alameda County Employees Retirement Association

C I T Y O F O R L A N D O G E N E R A L E M P L O Y E E S P E N S I O N F U N D C H A P T E R , F. S. C O M P L I A N C E R E P O R T S E

City of Orlando General Employees Pension Fund Chapter , F.S. Compliance Report September 30, 2017

City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power

Minnesota State Retiement System Legislators Retirement Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2006

The next regular meeting of the Retirement Board will be held at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, March 15, 2018.

Alameda County Employees Retirement Association

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2016

Orange County Employees Retirement System

Re: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund

Fire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2017

Orange County Employees Retirement System

University of California Retirement Plan

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust

AGENDA EBMUD EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM January 17, 2013 Training Resource Center (TRC1) 8:30 a.m.

February 11, Mr. Tom Mann Executive Director Kansas City Public School Retirement System 4600 The Paseo Kansas City, MO 64110

Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, Copyright 2007

City of Vero Beach Firefighters Relief and Pension Fund Chapter , F.S. Compliance Report

C I T Y O F O R L A N D O G E N E R A L E M P L O Y E E S P E N S I O N F U N D C H A P T E R , F. S. C O M P L I A N C E R E P O R T S E

CITY OF CLEARWATER EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN Chapter , F.S. Compliance Report In Connection with the January 1, 2018 Funding Actuarial Valuation

CITY OF SAN JOSE FEDERATED CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM POSTEMPLOYMENT HEALTHCARE PLAN. Audit of June 30, 2016 OPEB Actuarial Valuation

Kern County Employees Retirement Association

CITY OF TALLAHASSEE PENSION PLAN FOR GENERAL EMPLOYEES CHAPTER , F.S. COMPLIANCE REPORT

C H A P T E R , F. S. C O M P L I A N C E R E P O R T S E P T E M B E R 3 0,

as of July 1, 2006 Copyright October 2006 THE SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE PARENT OF THE SEGAL COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Actuarial Valuation Report

C H A P T E R , F. S. C O M P L I A N C E R E P O R T S E P T E M B E R 3 0,

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPOR

Bert Fish Medical Center, Inc.

Edison. Pension Trust

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of December 31, 2010

March 26, The purpose of the valuation of the City of Eastpointe Employees Death Benefit Plan as of November 1, 2012 is to:

Re: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2012 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund

Middlesex County Retirement System

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A G E N E R A L E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T P L

Subject: Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Ending December 31, 2016

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2005

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017

Transcription:

Local 25 S.E.I.U. and Participating Employers Actuarial Certification of Plan Status as of October 1, 2014 under IRC Section 432 Copyright 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

101 NORTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 500 CHICAGO, IL 60606 T 312.984.8500 www.segalco.com December 17, 2014 Board of Trustees Local 25 S.E.I.U. and Participating Employers 111 East Wacker Drive, 25th Floor Chicago, IL 60601-4205 Dear Trustees: As required by ERISA Section 305 and Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 432, we have completed the Plan s actuarial status certification as of October 1, 2014. The attached exhibits outline the projections performed and the results of the various tests required by the statute. These projections have been prepared based on the Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2013 and in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices and a current understanding of the law. The actuarial calculations were completed under the supervision of Harold S. Cooper, FSA, MAAA, EA. As of October 1, 2014, the Plan is in neither critical status nor endangered status. In other words, it is in the Green Zone. This certification is being filed with the Internal Revenue Service, pursuant to ERISA section 305(b)(3) and IRC section 432(b)(3). Segal Consulting ( Segal ) does not practice law and, therefore, cannot and does not provide legal advice. Any statutory interpretation on which the certification is based reflects Segal s understanding as an actuarial firm. Due to the complexity of the statute and the significance of its ramifications, Segal recommends that the Board of Trustees consult with legal counsel when making any decisions regarding compliance with ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.

We look forward to reviewing this certification with you at your next meeting and to answering any questions you may have. We are available to assist the Trustees in developing a plan management and funding policy to help guide future planning and oversight. Sincerely, Segal Consulting, a Member of the Segal Group By: Jessica Streit Harold S. Cooper, FSA, MAAA, EA Benefits Consultant Vice President and Actuary cc: Mr. Jim McArdle Lee Elberts, Esq.

December 17, 2014 ACTUARIAL STATUS CERTIFICATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 UNDER IRC SECTION 432 This is to certify that Segal Consulting, a Member of The Segal Group, Inc. ( Segal ) has prepared an actuarial status certification under Internal Revenue Code Section 432 for the Local 25 S.E.I.U. and Participating Employers as of October 1, 2014 in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices. It has been prepared at the request of the Board of Trustees to assist in administering the Fund and meeting filing and compliance requirements under federal law. This certification may not otherwise be copied or reproduced in any form without the consent of the Board of Trustees and may only be provided to other parties in its entirety. The measurements shown in this actuarial certification may not be applicable for other purposes. Future actuarial measurements may differ significantly from the current measurements presented in this report due to such factors as the following: plan experience differing from that anticipated by the economic or demographic assumptions; changes in economic or demographic assumptions; increases or decreases expected as part of the natural operation of the methodology used for these measurements; differences in statutory interpretation and changes in plan provisions or applicable law. This certification is based on the October 1, 2013 actuarial valuation, dated May 14, 2014. Additional assumptions required for the projections and sources of financial information used are summarized in Exhibit V. Segal Consulting does not practice law and, therefore, cannot and does not provide legal advice. Any statutory interpretations on which this certification is based reflect Segal s understanding as an actuarial firm. This certification was based on the assumption that the Plan was qualified as a multiemployer plan for the year. I am a member of the American Academy of Actuaries and I meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion herein. To the best of my knowledge, the information supplied in this actuarial certification is complete and accurate. As required by IRC Section 432(b)(3)(B)(iii), the projected industry activity is based on information provided by the plan sponsor. In my opinion, the projections are based on reasonable actuarial estimates, assumptions and methods that (other than projected industry activity) offer my best estimate of anticipated experience under the Plan. Harold S. Cooper, FSA, MAAA Vice President and Actuary Enrolled Actuary No. 14-03367 1

Certificate Contents EXHIBIT I Status Determination as of October 1, 2014 EXHIBIT II EXHIBIT III EXHIBIT IV EXHIBIT V Summary of Actuarial Valuation Projections Funding Standard Account Projections Funding Standard Account Projected Bases Assumed Established After October 1, 2013 Actuarial Assumptions and Methodology 2

EXHIBIT I Status Determination as of October 1, 2014 Status Critical Status Condition Test Component Result 1. Funding deficiency projected in four years? No 2. Funding deficiency projected in five years No AND present value of vested benefits for non-actives more than present value of vested benefits for actives AND normal cost plus interest on unfunded actuarial accrued liability (unit credit basis) greater than contributions for current year? 3. Funding deficiency projected in five years No AND funded percentage less than 65%? No No 4. Funded percentage less than 65% No AND assets plus contributions less than benefit payments and administrative expenses over seven years? No No 5. Assets plus contributions less than benefit payments and administrative expenses over five years? No 6. In critical status for immediately preceding plan year and funding deficiency projected within ten years? No In Critical Status? Endangered Status 1. Funded percentage less than 80% No AND not in Critical Status? Yes No 2. Funding deficiency projected in seven years No AND not in Critical Status? Yes No In Endangered Status? In Seriously Endangered Status? Neither Critical Status Nor Endangered Status Neither Critical nor Endangered Status? Yes No Final Result No No No No Yes 3

EXHIBIT II Summary of Actuarial Valuation Projections The actuarial factors as of October 1, 2014 (based on projections from the October 1, 2013 valuation certificate): I. Asset and Contribution Information 1. Market value of assets $397,090,716 2. Actuarial value of assets 375,353,949 3. Reasonably anticipated contributions a. Upcoming year 20,750,400 b. Present value for the next five years 87,101,995 c. Present value for the next seven years 114,028,093 II. Liabilities 1. Present value of vested benefits for active participants 155,965,208 2. Present value of vested benefits for non-active participants 239,449,744 3. Total unit credit accrued liability 403,773,054 4. Present value of payments Benefit Payments Administrative Expenses Total a. Next five years $115,113,152 $6,377,752 $121,490,904 b. Next seven years 157,441,446 8,570,727 166,012,173 5. Unit credit normal cost plus expenses 10,781,446 III. Funded Percentage (I.2)/(II.3) 93.0% IV. Funding Standard Account 1. Credit Balance as of the end of prior year $83,044,749 2. Years to projected funding deficiency, if within seven years N/A 4

EXHIBIT III Funding Standard Account Projections The table below presents the Funding Standard Account Projections for the Plan Years beginning October 1, 2013 through 2020. Year Beginning October 1 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1. Credit balance at beginning of year $77,826,652 $83,044,749 $87,177,104 $87,104,295 $89,991,236 $94,936,103 $98,676,643 $104,111,929 2. Interest on (1) 5,836,999 6,228,356 6,538,283 6,532,822 6,749,343 7,120,208 7,400,748 7,808,395 3. Normal cost 9,832,480 9,394,542 9,268,521 9,252,083 9,240,793 9,336,453 9,392,188 9,428,226 4. Administrative expenses 1,346,509 1,386,904 1,428,511 1,471,366 1,515,507 1,560,972 1,607,801 1,656,035 5. Net amortization charges 11,496,974 11,194,871 15,479,370 12,694,617 10,948,831 12,273,001 10,854,897 9,748,889 6. Interest on (3), (4) and (5) 1,700,697 1,648,224 1,963,230 1,756,355 1,627,885 1,737,782 1,639,116 1,562,486 7. Expected contributions 22,899,044 20,750,400 20,750,400 20,750,400 20,750,400 20,750,400 20,750,400 20,750,400 8. Interest on (7) 858,714 778,140 778,140 778,140 778,140 778,140 778,140 778,140 9. Credit balance at end of year: (1) + (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) + (7) + (8) $83,044,749 $87,177,104 $87,104,295 $89,991,236 $94,936,103 $98,676,643 $104,111,929 $111,053,228 5

EXHIBIT IV Funding Standard Account Projected Bases Assumed Established After October 1, 2013 Schedule of Funding Standard Account Bases Type of Base Date Established Base Established Amortization Period Amortization Payment Actuarial Experience Gain 10/01/2014 -$8,226,585 15 -$866,946 Actuarial Experience Gain 10/01/2015-7,273,349 15-766,491 Actuarial Experience Gain 10/01/2016-11,427,242 15-1,204,242 Actuarial Experience Gain 10/01/2017-4,793,335 15-505,138 Actuarial Experience Gain 10/01/2018-1,634,678 15-172,268 6

EXHIBIT V Actuarial Assumptions and Methodology The actuarial assumptions and plan of benefits are as used in the October 1, 2013 actuarial valuation certificate, dated May 14, 2014, except as specifically described below. We also assumed that experience would emerge as projected, except as described below. The calculations are based on a current understanding of the requirements of ERISA Section 305 and IRC Section 432. Asset Information: Projected Industry Activity: Future Normal Costs: The market value of assets as of October 1, 2014 was estimated using the market value rate of return provided by the Investment Consultant. The income and expense items were based on information about contribution, benefit and expense payments provided by the Fund Administrator. For projections after that date, the assumed administrative expenses were increased by 3% per year and the benefit payments were projected based on the October 1, 2013 actuarial valuation. The projected net investment return was assumed to be 7.5% of the average market value of assets for the Plan Years ending 2014-2020. Any resulting investment gains or losses due to the operation of the asset valuation method are amortized over 15 years in the Funding Standard Account. As required by Internal Revenue Code Section 432, assumptions with respect to projected industry activity are based on information provided by the plan sponsor. Based on this information, the number of active participants is assumed to decrease to 9,600 for the Plan Year ending September 31, 2015 and remain level thereafter. On the average, contributions are assumed to be made for each active for 1,965 hours each year. Based on the assumed industry activity, we have determined the Normal Cost based on an open group forecast with the number of active participants assumed to decrease to 9,600 for the Plan Year ending September 30, 2015 and remain level thereafter. New hires are assumed to have the same demographic mix as actual new hires in the last five years. 7

Technical Issues Segal Consulting ( Segal ) does not practice law and, therefore, cannot and does not provide legal advice. Any statutory interpretation on which the certification is based reflects Segal s understanding as an actuarial firm. Due to the complexity of the statute and the significance of its ramifications, Segal recommends that the Board of Trustees consult with legal counsel when making any decisions regarding compliance with ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. 5476699v1/10739.001 8