Indoor Propagation Models

Similar documents
EE 577: Wireless and Personal Communications

EE Large Scale Path Loss Log Normal Shadowing. The Flat Fading Channel

EELE 5414 Wireless Communications. Chapter 4: Mobile Radio Propagation: Large-Scale Path Loss

EELE 6333: Wireless Commuications

Table of Contents. Kocaeli University Computer Engineering Department 2011 Spring Mustafa KIYAR Optimization Theory

Wireless Communications

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 7. Path Loss Models. Shadowing

Indoor Measurement And Propagation Prediction Of WLAN At

EENG473 Mobile Communications Module 3 : Week # (11) Mobile Radio Propagation: Large-Scale Path Loss

Optimizing the Existing Indoor Propagation Prediction Models

The Wireless Communication Channel. Objectives

Radio Path Loss and Penetration Loss. Measurements in and around Homes. and Trees at 5.85 GHz. Mobile and Portable Radio Research Group

Probability distributions relevant to radiowave propagation modelling

Radio Propagation Modelling

Path Loss Models and Link Budget

Unit 1: The wireless channel

AN021: RF MODULES RANGE CALCULATIONS AND TEST

The Impact of Fading on the Outage Probability in Cognitive Radio Networks

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 9. Co-Channel Interference

White Paper: Comparison of Narrowband and Ultra Wideband Channels. January 2008

ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Lecture 3. Interference and Shadow Margins, Handoff Gain, Coverage

ECE 5325/6325: Wireless Communication Systems Lecture Notes, Spring 2013

Pathloss and Link Budget From Physical Propagation to Multi-Path Fading Statistical Characterization of Channels. P r = P t Gr G t L P

Proposed Propagation Model for Dehradun Region

PROPAGATION PATH LOSS IN URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREA

Statistical Analysis of On-body Radio Propagation Channel for Body-centric Wireless Communications

arxiv: v2 [cs.it] 22 Feb 2016

Attenuation over distance and excess path loss for a large-area indoor commercial topology at 2.4 GHz

ECE 5325/6325: Wireless Communication Systems Lecture Notes, Fall Link Budgeting. Lecture 7. Today: (1) Link Budgeting

Review of Comparative Analysis of Empirical Propagation model for WiMAX

Suburban Area Path loss Propagation Prediction and Optimisation Using Hata Model at 2375MHz

Path Loss Prediction in Wireless Communication System using Fuzzy Logic

On Predicting Large Scale Fading Characteristics with the MR-FDPF Method

Lecture 2: Wireless Propagation Channels

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Performance of Path Loss Model in 4G Wimax Wireless Communication System in 2390 MHz

Realistic Indoor Path Loss Modeling for Regular WiFi Operations in India

Research Article BEP/SEP and Outage Performance Analysis of L-Branch Maximal-Ratio Combiner for κ-μ Fading

A Novel Hybrid Approach For Path Loss Exponent Estimation In Vanet Application

Comparison Between Measured and Predicted Path Loss for Mobile Communication in Malaysia

Er. Neha Sharma and Dr. G.C.Lall HCTM, Kaithal(affiliated to KUK, Haryana, India)

Path Loss Measurements for a Non-Line-of-Sight Mobile-to-Mobile Environment

A Model of Coverage Probability under Shadow Fading

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF INDOOR WLAN MOBILITY

COMPARISON OF RADIO PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS AT 700 AND 2,500 MHz PERTAINING TO MACROCELLULAR COVERAGE

An Investigation on the Use of ITU-R P in IEEE N Path Loss Modelling

ANALYSIS OF A DEVELOPED BUILDING PENETRATION PATH LOSS MODEL FOR GSM WIRELESS ACCESS

Performance Evaluation of Channel Propagation Models and Developed Model for Mobile Communication

Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Quantification

I. INTRODUCTION II. COVERAGE AREA

On the Capacity of Log-Normal Fading Channels

Limit Theorems for the Empirical Distribution Function of Scaled Increments of Itô Semimartingales at high frequencies

Measurement of Radio Propagation Path Loss over the Sea for Wireless Multimedia

Equity correlations implied by index options: estimation and model uncertainty analysis

900 MHz PATH LOSS MEASUREMENTS AND PREDICTION TECHNIQUES FOR IN-BUILDING COMMUNICATION SYSTEM DESIGN. Scott Y. Seidel and Theodore S.

Version A. Problem 1. Let X be the continuous random variable defined by the following pdf: 1 x/2 when 0 x 2, f(x) = 0 otherwise.

Probability Distributions

Efficient and Consistent Path loss Model for Mobile Network Simulation

Mobile and Wireless Compu2ng CITS4419 Week 2: Wireless Communica2on

Empirical Characterization of Propagation Path Loss and Performance Evaluation for Co-Site Urban Environment

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE STOCHASTIC HYDROLOGY. Lecture -5 Course Instructor : Prof. P. P. MUJUMDAR Department of Civil Engg., IISc.

Analysis of kurtosis-based LOS/NLOS Identification based on indoor MIMO Channel Measurements

Business Statistics 41000: Probability 3

Two Hours. Mathematical formula books and statistical tables are to be provided THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER. 22 January :00 16:00

Comparative Analysis of Path Loss Propagation Models in Radio Communication

Posterior Inference. , where should we start? Consider the following computational procedure: 1. draw samples. 2. convert. 3. compute properties

Normal Inverse Gaussian (NIG) Process

IJESRT. Scientific Journal Impact Factor: (ISRA), Impact Factor: 2.114

Valuation of Volatility Derivatives. Jim Gatheral Global Derivatives & Risk Management 2005 Paris May 24, 2005

Lecture 23. STAT 225 Introduction to Probability Models April 4, Whitney Huang Purdue University. Normal approximation to Binomial

UQ, STAT2201, 2017, Lectures 3 and 4 Unit 3 Probability Distributions.

Dokumentnamn. Document - Ref PTS-ER-2004:32

EE266 Homework 5 Solutions

PATH LOSS PREDICTION FOR LOW-RISE BUILDINGS WITH IMAGE CLASSIFICATION ON 2-D AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS

Monte Carlo Methods in Option Pricing. UiO-STK4510 Autumn 2015

Dependence Structure and Extreme Comovements in International Equity and Bond Markets

PATH LOSS PREDICTION FOR GSM MOBILE NETWORKS FOR URBAN REGION OF ABA, SOUTH-EAST NIGERIA

Hedging Under Jump Diffusions with Transaction Costs. Peter Forsyth, Shannon Kennedy, Ken Vetzal University of Waterloo

ISSN: Guizhen * et al., 6(11): November, 2017] Impact Factor: 4.116

Real-Time Path Loss Modelling for a More Robust Wireless Performance

SYSM 6304 Risk and Decision Analysis Lecture 2: Fitting Distributions to Data

A Path Loss Calculation Scheme for Highway ETC Charging Signal Propagation

Value at Risk Ch.12. PAK Study Manual

A Sum-Product Model as a Physical Basis for Shadow Fading

Empirical Path Loss Models for n Wireless networks at 2.4Ghz in rural regions

Lecture Stat 302 Introduction to Probability - Slides 15

Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications: New Results for Rural Connectivity

MAS3904/MAS8904 Stochastic Financial Modelling

Adjustment of Lee Path Loss Model for Suburban Area in Kuala Lumpur-Malaysia

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PATH LOSS PREDICTION MODELS FOR URBAN MACROCELLULAR ENVIRONMENTS

F19: Introduction to Monte Carlo simulations. Ebrahim Shayesteh

IEOR 165 Lecture 1 Probability Review

Analytical formulas for local volatility model with stochastic. Mohammed Miri

Link Budget Calculation. Ermanno Pietrosemoli Marco Zennaro

The Bernoulli distribution

Path Loss Modeling Based on Field Measurements Using Deployed 3.5 GHz WiMAX Network

Stochastic Differential Equations in Finance and Monte Carlo Simulations

2.1 Mathematical Basis: Risk-Neutral Pricing

Normal Distribution. Notes. Normal Distribution. Standard Normal. Sums of Normal Random Variables. Normal. approximation of Binomial.

The data-driven COS method

Transcription:

Indoor Propagation Models Outdoor models are not accurate for indoor scenarios. Examples of indoor scenario: home, shopping mall, office building, factory. Ceiling structure, walls, furniture and people effect the EM wave propagation. Large/small number of obstacles, material of the walls etc. Modeling approach: classify various environments into few types and model each type individually. Generic model is very difficult to build. Key Model The average path loss is or in db: d ν LA ( d ) = L0 = const d ~ d d 0 d LA ( d )[ db] = L0[ db] + 10νlg d 0 ν ν (4.1) where L 0 is path loss at reference distance d 0. Lecture 4 28-Sep-16 1(27)

ITU Indoor Path Loss Model 1 The model is used to predict propagation path loss inside buildings. The average path loss in db is L ( d )[ db] = 20lg f + 10ν lg d + L ( n) 28 A f where: Limits: f is the frequency in MHz; d is the distance in m; d > 1 m; ν is the path loss exponent (found from measurements); L ( n ) is the floor penetration loss (measurements); f n is the number of floors (penetrated); 900MHz f 5200MHz 1 n 3 d > 1m 1 Recommendation ITU-R P.1238-8. Lecture 4 28-Sep-16 2(27)

Variations (fading) around the average are accounted for via lognormal distribution: ( ) ( ) L d [ db] = LA d [ db] + X σ (4.2) where X σ is a log-normal random variable (in db) of standard deviation σ [ db]. Variations on the order of (2...3) σ [ db] should be expected in practice. (2..3)σ Rule (adopted from "Empirical Rule" by Dan Kernler) Site-specific models will follow this generic model. Additional factors are included (floors, partitions, indoor-outdoor penetration etc.). Lecture 4 28-Sep-16 3(27)

T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall, 2002 Note: n = ν is the path loss exponent; f = 914 MHz. Lecture 4 28-Sep-16 4(27)

T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall, 2002 Lecture 4 28-Sep-16 5(27)

T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall, 2002 Lecture 4 28-Sep-16 6(27)

Table 4.1: path loss exponent factor 10ν in various environments Table 4.2: Floor penetration loss L ( n ) in various environments f Log-normal fading should be added as well, ( ) ( ) L d [ db] = LA d [ db] + X σ (4.2) Lecture 4 25-Sep-13 7(27)

T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall, 2002 Lecture 4 25-Sep-13 8(27)

T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall, 2002 Lecture 4 25-Sep-13 9(27)

Ericsson s Indoor Path Loss Model (900 MHz) T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall, 2002 Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 10(27)

Log-Normal Fading (Shadowing) Reminder: 3 factors in the total path loss, LP = LALLF LSF (2.5) Siwiak, Radiowave Propagation and Antennas for Personal Communications, Artech House, 1998 Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 11(27)

Log-Normal Fading (shadowing): this is a long-term (or largescale) fading since characteristic distance is a few hundreds wavelengths. Due to various terrain effects, the actual path loss varies about the average value predicted by the models above, p p [ db] L = L + L (4.5) where L p is the average path loss, L - its variation, which can be described by log-normal distribution. Overall, L p becomes a log-normal RV, where L p and db as well). ( L p ) ρ = 1 e 2πσ ( L ) 2 p Lp 2σ 2 (4.6) L p are in db, and σ is the standard deviation (in Physical explanation: multiple diffractions + the central limit theorem (in db). Shadowing: due to the obstruction of LOS path. The semi-empirical models above can be used together with the log-normal distribution. Reasonable physical assumptions result in statistical models for the PC. This approach is very popular and extensively used in practice. Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 12(27)

Log-Normal Fading: Derivation Tx Rx Assume signal at Rx is a result of many scattering/diffractions: Total Rx power: If E N = E Π Γ, Γ 1 (4.7) t 0 i i i= 1 N N 2 2 2 2 t t = 0 Π Γ i t = 0Π Γi i= 1 i= 1 N P E E or P P P = P + 20 lg Γ db 0, db i i= 1 Γ i are i.i.d., then PdB N P0, dbσdb (, ) (4.8) Log-normal distribution works well for i.i.d multiple diffractions ( N 5) and is used in practice to model large-scale fading (shadowing). In practice: σ db = 5...10 db (can take 8 db as an average). System design: allow for 2σ db margin (for about 95% reliability). Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 13(27)

Small-Scale (multipath) Fading Model E 2 E 3 E 1 E 5 Rx E 4 Many multipath components (plane waves) arriving at Rx at different angles, N E ( t) = E cos( ω t + ϕ ) t i i i= 1 N = E cosϕ cosωt E sinϕ sinωt i i i i i= 1 i= 1 This is in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) representation N E ( t) = E cos ωt E sin ω t = E cos( ω t + ϕ) t x y (4.9) Assume that i N 2 2 x y where E = E + E envelope I : E = E cos ϕ, Q: E = E sin ϕ x i i y i i i= 1 i= 1 E are i.i.d., and that ϕ [ 0,2 ] i N π are i.i.d. (4.10) Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 14(27)

By central limit theorem, E is Rayleigh distributed with pdf where 2 E, E N (0, σ ) 2 σ is the variance of E x (or E y ), x y x x ρ ( x) = exp, x 0 2 2 σ 2σ N 2 2 1 2 Ex Ei 2 i= 1 2 (4.11) σ = = (4.12) which is the total received power (for isotropic antennas). For this result to hold, N must be large ( N 5 10). 0.8 Rayleigh PDF 0.6 PDF 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5. xσ / Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 15(27)

Outage Probability and CDF Importance of the CDF in wireless system design. Rx operates well if E E If E th th the threshold effect. < E, the link is lost --> this is an outage. Outage probability = CDF is x F( x) = ρ ( t) dt = Pr( E < x) (4.13) 0 Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 16(27)

Rayleigh Fading For Rayleigh distribution, the outage probability is x 2 x 2 0 2σ (4.14) F( x) = Pr( E < x) = ρ ( t) dt = 1 exp Introduce the instantaneous signal power P 2 = P = σ = the average power, then P out { } = Pr SNR < γ P = x 2 / 2, γ P, (4.15) = 1 exp = 1 exp = F( P) γ P so that normalized SNR ( γ / γ ) or power ( P / P) PDF and CDF: and asymptotically, Note that P P x ( ) ( ) x f x = e, F x = 1 e (4.15a) P γ P P Pout = F( P) = (4.16) P γ γ = γ, where γ is the SNR. Note in (4.16) the 10db/decade law. Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 17(27)

Example: 3 3 P = 10 P = 10 P, or 30 db w.r.t. P out 3 i.e. if P out = 10 is desired, the Rx threshold is 30dB below one without fading (the average). 1 Rayleigh CDF Outage probability 1. 10 3 0.1 0.01 1. 10 4 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 γ / γ, db. Complex-valued model: N E ( t) = E e i e (4.17) t i= 1 results in complex Gaussian variables. i jϕ jωt Propagation channel gain simply normalized received signal, has the same distribution. Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 18(27)

Rayleigh Fading Channel 10 SISO 1x1 0 10 20 30 0 100 200 300 400 500 Received power (SNR) norm. to the average [db] vs distance (location, time) Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 19(27)

T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall, 2002 Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 20(27)

Measured Fading Channels T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall, 2002. Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 21(27)

LOS and Ricean Model Motivation: a LOS component. The distribution of in-phase and quadrature components is still Gaussian, but non-zero mean: N t ( ) = i cos( ω + ϕ i) + 0 cos( ω + ϕ0) (4.18) i= 1 E t E t E t Both E 0 and ϕ 0 are fixed (non-random constants). E ( t) = ( E + E )cos ωt ( E + E )sin ωt t x x0 y y0 2 2 x = y = 0, = ( x + x0) + ( y + y0) E E and E E E E E (4.19) Pdf of E has a Rice distribution( x = E, x0 = E0) : 2 2 x x xx 0 2 2 0 2 x + ρ = σ 2 σ σ 0 ( x) exp I, Note that if x 0 = 0, it reduces to the Rayleigh pdf. Introduce K-factor: 2 (4.20) K = x 2 2 0 / (2 σ ) (4.21) where x 0 / 2 is the LOS power, it is called LOS ( steady or 2 specular ) component, σ is the scattered (multipath or diffused) power, it is called diffused component. K tells us how strong the LOS is. Total average power = 2 2 2 x 0 / 2 + σ = σ (1 + K ) Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 22(27)

PDF of E becomes 2 2 2 0 x x x ρ ( x) = exp K I 2K σ 2 σ σ (4.22) 0.8 Rayleigh & Rice Densities 0.6 K=0 pdf 0.4 K=1 K=10 K=20 0.2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10. xσ / Note: normalized to the multipath power only. Q: do the same graph if normalized to the total average power. Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 23(27)

10 Rice CDF 1 0.1 Outage probability 0.01 1. 10 3 1.10 4 1.10 5 1.10 6 1.10 7 K = 0 K = 10 K = 1 K = 20 1.10 8 40 30 20 10 0 10 γ / γ, db Q.: find the CDF of Ricean distribution as a function of K and total (LOS + multipath) average power or SNR. Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 24(27)

Applications of Outage Probability 1) Fade margin evaluation for the link budget: P F P 1 out ( γth / γ 0) = ε = γ0 / γ th = 1/ out ( ε ) 2) Average outage time: T = P T out out 2) Average # of users in outage: N = P N out out To be discussed later on: level crossing rates (# of fades per unit time) average fade duration Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 25(27)

Monte-Carlo Method It is a powerful simulation technique to solve many statistical problems numerically in a very efficient way. You should be familiar with it. Detailed description of the method and many examples can be found in numerous references, including the following: [1] M.C. Jeruchim, P. Balaban, K.S. Shanmugan, Simulation of Communication Systems, Kluwer, New York, 2000. [2] W.H. Tranter et al, Principles of Communication System Simulation with Wireless Applications, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2004. [3] J.G. Proakis, M. Salehi, Contemporary Communication Systems Using MATLAB, Brooks/Cole, 2000. This is used in labs extensively. Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 26(27)

Summary Indoor propagation path loss models. Log-normal shadowing. Small-scale fading. Rayleigh & Rice distributions. Physical mechanisms. o Rappaport, Ch. 4. Reading: References: o S. Salous, Radio Propagation Measurement and Channel Modelling, Wiley, 2013. (available online) o J.S. Seybold, Introduction to RF propagation, Wiley, 2005. o https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/itu_model_for_indoor_attenua tion o Other books (see the reference list). Note: Do not forget to do end-of-chapter problems. Remember the learning efficiency pyramid! Lecture 4 4-Oct-17 27(27)