us OJ $TRICT COUR-1 RIO/\

Similar documents
Case 3:13-cr AWT Document 2 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Criminal NO. 3:13CR~S (llwrj -'"

2G17 SEP 2 6 Prl 3 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,('--,,; _.._ "9RIMINAL NO. 3:17CFJ:lj._J_/ftfn

Case 1:18-cr LY Document 3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS jp PH 1: 21 AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2017 EXHIBIT A

3:06-ar Date Filed 11/01/2006 Entry Number 259 (Court only) Page 1 of 10

Case 1:13-cr CMH Document 12 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39

Case 1:05-cr RWR Document 1 Filed 08/04/2005 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cr BEL Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:18-cr JS Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 INTRODUCTION

Case 1:14-cr PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:15-cr WTM-GER Document 1 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

Case 2:13-cr ES Document 11 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID: 62

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN (WATERLOO) DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 18-CR-2058.

Case 3:13-cr KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:17-cr AT-CMS Document 7 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : Hon. INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. No. INDICTMENT UNDER SEAL COUNT ONE

COUNT ONE (The Tax Shelter Fraud Conspiracy) Background

Case 1:14-cr JEI Document 28 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID: 105 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THEDISTRICTOFNEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINE SVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * ****** INDICTMENT. COUNT ONE (Wire Fraud)

Case 2:12-cr RWS Document 1 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (TOPEKA DOCKET)

FILED IN OPEN COURT U.S.D.C. Atlanta

Case 2:17-cr GMS Document 3 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DAVID B. CHALMERS, JR., : S1 05 Cr. 59 (DC) JOHN IRVING, LUDMIL DIONISSIEV, : BAYOIL (USA), INC., and BAYOIL SUPPLY & TRADING LIMITED, : COUNT ONE

Case 2:12-cr WHW Document 1 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

Case 1:13-cr RWS-ECS Document 1 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

RECEIVED SEP Case 3:18-cr MAS Document 64 Filed 09/25/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 89 WILLAM T. WALSHJ.D STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:18-cr BTM Document 1 Filed 06/29/18 PageID.9 Page 1 of 11. saf/\laif;\ co CASE UNSEALED PER ORDER OF COURT

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment: 1. The defendants MATTHEW BURSTEIN, ELIAS COMPRES,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * ******* SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

Case 2:13-cr LDD Document 24 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:12-cr CM Document 1 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: INTRODUCTION

Case 5:09-cr D Document 1 Filed 04/16/09 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 12 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 27

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City Docket) Case No. 09- I N D I C T M E N T COUNT ONE THE CONSPIRACY

Case 4:15-cr Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/27/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:17-cr AJN Document 2 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of X X. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act)

- - X CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE IEEPA AND THE ITR AND TO CONDUCT AN UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS. Background

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT V. INDICTMENT NO. * * * * * COUNT 1 18 U.S.C.

ROOKSIJOHNSON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. BERRY LOUIDORT RALPH MICHEL and LAUREN JASKY,

FILED JAN ~ ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. No. 1 : 18 - C R - Q 74. Count One

Case 2:13-cr KOB-TMP Document 1 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:14-cr CM Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION INDICTMENT. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud) A.

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 1 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOF EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 3:14-cr BJD-PDB Document 1 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID 1

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 1 Filed 12/20/2005 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:12-cr SD Document 1 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

2:11-cr MPM -DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

v. INDICTMENT NO. "-;fklt',j ~-- lfr/t

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET) STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cr PLF Document 1 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cr Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:17-cr NGG Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1. - against - Cr. No. (T. 15, U.S.C., 80b-6, 80b-I4 and 80b-17;

Case 1:10-cr REB Document 5 Filed 06/08/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division. Count 1: Count 2: CRIMINAL INFORMATION.

Case 2:16-cr RWS-JCF Document 1 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud) RELEVANT PERSONS AND ENTITIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE. INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2

Case 3:06-cr JWS-JDR Document 149 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 27

Case 3:15-cr JRS Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:14-cr JAR Document 1 Filed 08/06/14 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORIGINAL c:iled \!'\ CH..1E.EHS

Case 1:18-cr SHR Document 3 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Case 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 192 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA ) ) )

Case 1:06-cr EWN Document 169 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 7. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

Defendant. Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

INDICTMENT COUNT ONE. The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland charges that: Introduction

Case: 4:15-cr CDP-JMB Doc. #: 2 Filed: 07/23/15 Page: 1 of 16 PageID #: 11

Case 3:07-cr RRB Document 366 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 1 of 34


Case 3:17-mj BLM Document 1 Filed 02/08/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 12. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I so utg~c~!( us 01srR1cr cour r

Case 1:12-cr WYD Document 1 Filed 10/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. CR No. 08- :2.80 -I?," 18 U.S.C U.S.c U.S.C U~S.C.

Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 131

Case 1:08-cr Document 3 Filed 08/07/2008 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cr AT-JKL Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 6. Count One. Beginning from on or about February 1,2013, and continuing to on or about

Courthouse News Service

FILED SEP A. Parties, Relevant Persons, and Entities

Transcription:

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTZUI& SEP I 3 PH ~: 28 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION us OJ $TRICT COUR-1 RIO/\ ~ 11DOL E DISTRICT OF FL 0.. OHLAHOO. FLORIDA v. CASE No. 6:16-cr- rie-o.-\ -~.,-~~ 18 U.S.C. 1349 ERIC LEON AGER 18 U.S.C. 981 (a)(1 )(C) - Forfeiture 28 U.S.C. 2461 (c) - Forfeiture INFORMATION The United States Attorney charges: COUNT ONE A. Introduction At times material to this Information: 1. Tri-Med Corporation (Tri-Med) was a Florida corporation that claimed to be in the business of purchasing medical receivables at a discount. 2. ERIC LEON AGER was a Marketing Director for a company by the name of Tri-Med Associates (TMA). TMA was the "marketing arm" of Tri-Med. 8. Conspiracy 3. Beginning at a time unknown to the United States Attorney, but beginning at least by in or about October 2011, and continuing thereafter through and including in or about March 2014, in Orange County, Seminole County, and Pinellas County, in the Middle District of Florida, and elsewhere, ERIC LEON AGER

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 2 of 10 PageID 2 the defendant herein, did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with others, known and unknown to the United States Attorney: a. To commit mail fraud, by knowingly, willfully, and with intent to defraud, devising, and intending to devise, a scheme and artifice to defraud, and for obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises that related to material facts, and, for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, knowingly placing in any post office and authorized depository for mail matter to be sent and delivered by the United States Postal Service; knowingly depositing and causing to be deposited to be sent and delivered by a private and commercial interstate carrier; knowingly taking and receiving from the United States Postal Service and a private and commercial interstate carrier; and knowingly causing to be delivered by mail and private and commercial interstate carrier, according to the direction thereon, and at the place at which it was directed to be delivered by the person to whom it was addressed, any matter and thing, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341; and b. To commit wire fraud, by knowingly, willfully, and with intent to defraud devising and intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and for obtaining money and property, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and, for the purpose of executing the aforesaid scheme and artifice to defraud, knowingly transmitting and causing to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in 2

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 3 of 10 PageID 3 interstate and foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. C. Manner and Means 4. It was part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON AGER, and other co-conspirators known and unknown to the United States Attorney, would and did unlawfully devise and execute a scheme and artifice to defraud investors, and representatives of investors, of money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises. 5. It was a further part of the conspiracy that ERIC LEON AGER, and other co-conspirators known and unknown to the United States Attorney, would and did obtain money, and attempt to obtain money, from individuals and others through investments offered in connection with Tri-Med and TMA. 6. It was a further part of the conspiracy that the investments with Tri- Med and TMA offered by defendant ERIC LEON AGER, and other coconspirators known and unknown to the United States Attorney, were not legitimate investments, but were a "Ponzi" scheme by which money from later investors would be paid to earlier investors. 7. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, would and did solicit individuals, and representatives of those individuals, to invest with Tri-Med and TMA by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises that related to material facts, including, but not limited to, the following: 3

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 4 of 10 PageID 4 a. False claims that money invested with Tri-Med would be used to purchase medical receivables; b. False claims that money invested with Tri-Med and TMA was not at risk and was safe and secure; c. False claims that money invested with Tri-Med and TMA was backed by a major insurance company; d. False claims that Tri-Med was a group of prominent professional doctors and surgeons; e. False claims that money invested with Tri-Med and TMA would be held in trust at the law firm in Tam pa, Florida under the sole control of one of the partners of that law firm and would be so held until an appropriate case was identified and funded; f. False claims that the investors' funds would be placed in an FDIC Insured Trust Account under the control and direction of one of Florida's most respected law firms; g. False claims that money invested with Tri-Med and TMA would earn 8% a year; h. False claims that Tri-Med purchased medical receivables from its participating hospitals, surgery centers, and doctors; i. False claims that the investments were backed by a $500,000 letter of credit that was issued by Bank of America; j. False claims that Tri-Med was an "accredited" business with the Better Business Bureau; 4

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 5 of 10 PageID 5 k. False claims that a specific national law firm was one of its law firms and that the law firm had concluded that the investments offered by Tri Med and TMA were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933; I. False claims that the investment had been registered with and operated as an exempt security, as reviewed by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation. 8. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, would and did prepare, and caused to be prepared, documents and other materials that contained the false claims described in paragraph 7 above, including, but not limited to, documents entitled, "Monthly Income Agreement/Receipt, "Assignment of Interest," and "Agreement." 9. It was a further part of the conspiracy that ERIC LEON AGER, and other co-conspirators known and unknown to the United States Attorney, would and did send, and caused to be sent, to investors and others by United States Mail and interstate wire, the documents referenced in paragraph 8 above. 10. It was a further part of the conspiracy that ERIC LEON AGER, and other co-conspirators known and unknown to the United States Attorney, would and did authorize individuals to solicit investments with Tri-Med and TMA in exchange for receiving a commission that would be calculated based on a percentage of the principal that was invested with Tri-Med and TMA. 5

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 6 of 10 PageID 6 11. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, would and did use the money that had been invested with Tri-Med and TMA for purposes other than what had been represented to investors and their representatives. 12. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, in an effort to lull investors into a false sense of security concerning their investments and to convince investors that they would be receiving their money back, would and did cover-up, and attempt to cover-up, their conspiracy and scheme to defraud by engaging in the following: a. Falsely representing that investments with Tri-Med and TMA were profitable and earning the promised rates of return, when, in truth and in fact, as the defendants then and there well knew, the investments were not earning the promised rates of return and money from later investors was being used to pay earlier investors; and b. Providing investors with sham Assignments of Interest that falsely represented that investors had "indisputable liens" on specific civil lawsuits or insurance claims and that Tri-Med had assigned its interest in specific letters of protection to specific investors. 13. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, would and did fail to disclose to investors that a law firm had advised 6

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 7 of 10 PageID 7 Tri-Med that its materials contained several statements that might be inaccurate or misleading, that Trimed should conduct a rescission offer to all prior purchasers, that Tri-Med should refrain from any advertising or general solicitation of investors, and that Florida regulators could impose sanctions, require a rescission offer, or pursue other civil or criminal remedies regarding the investments that were being offered by Tri-Med and TMA. 14. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, would and did receive over $15 million from at least 200 investors, and representatives of those investors, as a result of devising and executing the conspiracy and scheme and artifice to defraud. 15. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, would and did use portions of the money that was obtained as a result of devising and executing the conspiracy and scheme and artifice to defraud for their own personal use. 7

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 8 of 10 PageID 8 16. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, would and did use the United States Mail and interstate wires in furtherance of the conspiracy and scheme and artifice to defraud, including by sending by United States Mail interest checks and copies of correspondence and various documents to investors located in the Middle District of Florida, by making interstate telephone calls from the Middle District of Florida to a conspirator located outside of Florida, by receiving interstate telephone calls in the Middle District of Florida from a conspirator located outside of Florida, by using interstate wires to send emails to a conspirator located outside of Florida, by using interstate wires to receive emails in the Middle District of Florida from a conspirator located outside of Florida, by using interstate wires in the Middle District of Florida to communicate with investors by telephone and email, and by causing wire transfers of funds to be made from the Tri-Med account in the Middle District of Florida to an account outside of Florida. 17. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant ERIC LEON Attorney, would and did perform acts and make statements to hide and conceal, and cause to be hidden and concealed, the purpose of the scheme to defraud and the acts committed in furtherance thereof. All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349. 8

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 9 of 10 PageID 9 FORFEITURE 1. The allegations contained in Count One of this Information are hereby realleged and incorporated by reference for the purpose of alleging forfeitures pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981 (a)(1 )(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c). 2. Upon conviction of the violations alleged in Count One of this Information, the defendant, ERIC LEON AGER, shall forfeit to the United States of America, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981 (a)(1 )(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461 (c), all of their interest in any property constituting or derived from proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the said violations, including, but not limited to a money judgment in the amount of at least $10,347,226 representing the amount of proceeds obtained by the defendants as a result of the allegations alleged in Count One of the Information. 3. If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants: a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; d. has been substantially diminished in value; or e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty, 9

Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 10 of 10 PageID 10 the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property under the provisions of Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461 (c). By: A. LEE BENTLEY, Ill United States Attorney ~ (~ ;;, awflp. Napje1 v Assistant United States Attorney By: Katherine M. Ho Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Orlando Division 10