SUPER-REPLICATIO WITH OLIEAR TRASACTIO COSTS AD VOLATILITY UCERTAITY arxiv:1411.1229v3 [q-fi.mf 5 Ju 215 PETER BAK, YA DOLISKY AD SELIM GÖKAY HEBREW UIVERSITY AD TU BERLI Abstract. We study super-replicatio of cotiget claims i a illiquid market with model ucertaity. Illiquidity is captured by oliear trasactio costs i discrete time ad model ucertaity arises as our oly assumptio o stock price returs is that they are i a rage specified by fixed volatility bouds. We provide a dual characterizatio of super-replicatio prices as a supremum of pealized expectatios for the cotiget claim s payoff. We also describe the scalig limit of this dual represetatio whe the umber of tradig periods icreases to ifiity. Hece, this paper complemets the results i [11 ad [19 for the case of model ucertaity. 1. Itroductio We study a illiquid discrete time market with model ucertaity. As i [11 we cosider the case where the size of the trade has a immediate but temporary effect o the price of the asset. This model captures the classical case of proportioal trasactio costs as well as other illiquidity models such as the discrete-time versio ofthe model itroduced by Ceti, Jarrowad Protteri [6 forcotiuous time. By cotrast to [11, our sole assumptio o the price dyamics of the traded security is that the absolute value of the log-returs is bouded from below ad above. This is a atural discrete-time versio of the widely studied ucertai volatility models; see, e.g., [9, [22 ad [25. The paper [7 studies super-replicatio of game optios i such a discrete-time model, but does ot allow for ay market frictios. The bechmark problem i models with ucertai volatilities is the descriptio of super-replicatio prices. I our versio of such a result i a model with trasactio costs, we provide a geeral duality for Europea optios with a uppersemicotiuous payoff. Specifically, Theorem 2.2 provides a combiatio of the dual characterizatio for super-replicatio prices i frictioless ucertai volatility models see [9 with aalogous duality formulae i biomial markets with frictios see [11. Let us emphasize that, uder volatility ucertaity, we do ot defie super-replicatio prices merely i a almost sure sese because we actually isist o super-replicatio for ay possible evolutio of stock prices which respects the specified volatility bouds. Sice, i cotrast to [11, i our setup the set of all possible stock price evolutios is ucoutable we caot fid a domiatig probability Date: April 8, 218. 21 Mathematics Subject Classificatio. 91G1, 91G4. Key words ad phrases. Super replicatio, Hedgig with Frictio, Volatility Ucertaity, Limit Theorems. The authors were supported by the Eistei Foudatio Grat o.a 212 137. The secod author also ackowledges support of the Marie Curie Actios fellowships Grat o.618235. 1
2 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay measure which will give positive weight to every possible evolutio of stock prices. Hece, the duality result of Theorem 2.2 goes beyod the ow classical results for almost sure super-replicatio, ad it complemets the fidigs of [3, who cosider a probabilistically more geeral settig albeit without frictios. For a discussio of the fudametal theorem of asset pricig with proportioal trasactio costs uder model ucertaity, see [4. The key observatio for the proof of Theorem 2.2 is that for cotiuous payoffs oe ca fid approximative discrete models where classical duality results give us super-replicatio strategies that ca be lifted to the origial settig with ucertai volatilities i a way that allows us to cotrol the differece i profits ad losses. I Theorem 2.3 we cosider the special case of a covex payoff profile. I frictioless models with volatility ucertaity it is well-kow from, e.g., [2, [18 or Remark 7.2 i [15 that the super-replicatio price coicides with the oe computed i the classical model where the volatility always takes the maximal value. We show that this result also holds i our framework with oliear trasactio costs if these are determiistic. Fially, we study the scalig limit of our super-replicatio prices whe the umber of tradig periods becomes large. Theorem 2.7 describes this scalig limit as the value of a stochastic volatility cotrol problem o the Wieer space. We use the duality result Theorem 2.2 ad study the limit of the dual terms by applyig the theory of weak covergece of stochastic processes. This exteds the approach take i [11, sice we eed to exted Kusuoka s costructio of suitable martigales see [19, Sectio 5 to our settig with volatility ucertaity. As a result, we get a uderstadig of how Kusuoka s fidig of volatility ucertaity i the descriptio of the scalig limit is exteded to our settig which already starts with volatility ucertaity. I the special case of a frictioless setup, we recover Peg s [23 result that the limit is equal to the payoff s G expectatio with upper ad lower bouds as i the discrete setup. I setups with market frictios, cotiuous-time models are kow to produce trivial super-replicatio prices whe oe cosiders proportioal trasactio costs, cf., e.g., [21 ad [24, or o liquidity effect at all whe oe has oliear, differetiable trasactio costs or market impact, see [6 or [2. Our scalig limit, by cotrast, gives a value i betwee these two extremes ad ca be viewed as a covex measure of risk for the payoff as i [14 or [16. Our approach to the proof of the mai results is purely probabilistic ad based o the theory of weak covergece of stochastic processes. This approach allows us to study a quite geeral class of path depedet Europea optios, ad a geeral class of oliear trasactio costs. 2. Prelimiaries ad Mai Results 2.1. The discrete-time model. Let us start by itroducig a discrete time fiacial model with volatility ucertaity. We fix a time horizo ad cosider a fiacial market with a riskless savigs accout ad a risky stock. The savigs accout will be used as a umeraire ad thus we ormalize its value at time =,..., to B = 1. The stock price evolutio startig from s > will be deoted by S >, =,1,...,. Hece, by itroducig the log-retur
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 3 X logs /S 1 for period = 1,..., we ca write 2.1 S = s exp X m, =,...,. Our sole assumptio o these dyamics will be that there are volatility bouds o the stock s price fluctuatios i the sese that the absolute values of these logreturs are bouded from below ad above: 2.2 σ X σ, = 1,...,, for some costats σ σ <. I other words the log-returs will take values i the path-space Ω Ω σ,σ { ω = x 1,...,x R : σ x σ, = 1,..., } ad idetifyig these returs with the caoical process X k ω x k for ω = x 1,...,x Ω we fid that 2.1 allows us to view the stock s price evolutio as a process S = S,..., defied o Ω. Clearly, the caoical filtratio F σx 1,...,X, =,...,, coicides with the oe geerated by S = S,...,. Similar models with volatility ucertaity have bee cosidered i [7. The aim of the preset paper is to study the combied effects of volatility ucertaity ad oliear trasactio costs. Followig [6, 11, 17, we assume these costs to be give by a pealty fuctio g : {,1,...,} Ω R R + where g,ω,β deotes the costs i terms of our umeraire B of tradig β R worth of stock at time whe the evolutio of the stock price is determied by the returs from ω Ω. Assumptio 2.1. The cost fuctio g : {,1,...,} Ω R R + is F,..., -adapted. Moreover, for ay =,...,, the costs g,ω,β are a oegative covex fuctio i β R with g,ω, = for ay fixed ω Ω ad a cotiuous fuctio i ω Ω for ay fixed β R. Forsimplicityofotatiowewillofte suppressthedepedece ofcostsoω ad simply write g β for g,ω,β. We will proceed similarly with other fuctios depedig o ω Ω. I our setup a tradig strategy is a pair π = y,γ where y deotes the iitial wealth ad γ : {,1,..., 1} Ω R is a F -adapted process specifyig the umber γ = γ,ω of shares held at the begiig of ay period =,..., with the stock price evolutio give by ω Ω. The set of all portfolios startig with iitial capital y will be deoted by Ay. The evolutio of the mark-to-market value Y π = Y πω,..., resultig from a tradig strategy π = y,γ Ay is give by Y π = y ad the differece equatio Y π +1 Y π = γ S +1 S g γ γ 1 S, =,..., 1,
4 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay where we let γ 1. Hece, we start with zero stocks i our portfolio ad tradig to the ew positio γ to be held after time icurs the trasactio costs g γ γ 1 S, which is the oly frictio i our model. Hece, the value Y π +1 represets the portfolio s mark-to-market value before the trasactio at time +1 is made. ote that, focussig o the mark-to-market value rather tha the liquidatio value, we disregard i particular the costs of uwidig ay o-zero positio for simplicity. 2.2. Robust super-replicatio with frictios. The bechmark problem for models with ucertai volatility is the super-replicatio of a cotiget claim. We ivestigate this problem i the presece of market frictios as specified by a fuctio g satisfyig Assumptio 2.1. So cosider a Europea optio F : R +1 + R + which pays off FS whe the stock price evolutio is S = S,...,. The super-replicatio price VF = Vg σ,σ F is the defied as V σ,σ g F if { y R : π Ay with Y π ω FSω ω Ω σ,σ}. We emphasize that we require the costructio of a robust super-replicatio strategy π whichleadstoatermialvaluey π thatdomiatesthepayoffx iay coceivable sceario ω Ω. Our first result provides a dual descriptio of super-replicatio prices: Theorem 2.2. Let G : Ω R R +, =,1,...,, deote the Legedre-Fechel trasform or covex cojugate of g, i.e., G α sup{αβ g β}, α R. β R The, uder Assumptio 2.1, the super-replicatio price of ay cotiget claim F with upper-semicotiuous payoff fuctio F : R +1 + R + is give by [ VF = sup P P σ,σ E P FS G EP [S F S S where P σ,σ deotes the set of all Borel probability measures o Ω = Ω σ,σ ad where E P deotes the expectatio with respect to such a probability measure P. The proof of this theorem will be carried out i Sectio 3.1 below. Observe that this result is a hybrid of the dual characterizatio for super-replicatio prices i frictioless ucertai volatility models ad of aalogous duality formulae i biomial markets with frictios; see [8 ad [11, respectively. 2.3. Covex payoff fuctios. Our ext result deals with the special case where the payoff F is a oegative covex fuctio of the stock price evolutio S = S,...,. It is well kow that i a frictioless biomial model, the price of a Europea optio with a covex payoff is a icreasig fuctio of the volatility. This implies that super-replicatio prices i ucertai volatility models coicide with the replicatio costs i the model with maximal compatible volatility; see [2. The ext theorem gives a geeralizatio of this claim for the setup of volatility ucertaity uder frictio. Theorem 2.3. Suppose that the cost fuctio g = g,ω,β is determiistic i the sese that it does ot deped o ω Ω.
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 5 The the super-replicatio price of ay covex payoff F : R +1 + R + is give by Vg σ,σ F = V g F where V g F Vg σ,σ F deotes the super-replicatio price of F = FS i the Biomial model with frictios for S with volatility σ ad cost fuctio g. Proof. The relatio holdig true trivially, it suffices to costruct, for ay ǫ >, a strategy γ which super-replicates FS i every sceario from Ω startig with iitial capital y = ǫ+v g F. The biomial model with volatility σ ca be formalized o Ω { 1,1} with caoical process X k ω x k for ω = x 1,...,x Ω by lettig the stock price evolutio be give iductively by S s ad S S 1 expσx, = 1,...,. With F,..., deotig the correspodig caoical filtratio, we get from the defiitio of V g F that there is a F,..., -adapted process γ such that with γ 1 we have 2.3 ǫ+v g F+ γ S +1 S g γ γ 1 S FS everywhere o Ω. I view of 2.2, for ay ω Ω ad = 1,..., there are uique weights λ +1 ω,λ 1 ω with λ +1 ω+λ 1 ω = 1 such that 2.4 e Xω = λ +1 ωe σ +λ 1 ωe σ. It is readily checked that also the weights λ ω ω sum up to 1. Ideed, 2.5 λ ω ω { 1,+1} λ ω m m ω, ω = ω 1,...,ω { 1,+1}, = Moreover, for = 1,..., 1 we have 2.6 λ ω = λω m=+1 λ +1 m ω+λ 1 m ω = 1, = 1,...,. λ +1 m ω+λ 1 m ω = λ ω,ω, ω { 1+,1} which i cojuctio with 2.4 ad the adaptedess of S etails the represetatio 2.7 S ω = s λ +1 m ωeσ +λ 1 ωe σ = S ω,1,...,1λ ω ω = ωλ ω { 1,+1} ω ΩS ω ω for ay = 1,...,, ω Ω. ow evaluate 2.3 at ω Ω, multiply by λ ω ad the take the sum over all ω Ω.
6 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay The right side of 2.3 the aggregates to 2.8 R ω ΩFSωλ ω F Sωλ ω = FS ω Ω where the estimate follows from 2.5 i cojuctio with the covexity of F : R +1 + R ad where for the last idetity we exploited 2.7. O the left side of 2.3 the cotributios from the costat ǫ + V g F just reproduce this very costat because of 2.5. Sice γ ad S are F,..., - adapted, the th summad i the first sum of 2.3 cotributes I ω Ωγ ωs +1 ω S ωλ ω = ω { 1,1} x { 1,1} γ S ω,1,...,1e σx 1λ ω λ x By defiitio of λ ±1 +1 we have e σx 1λ x +1 = 1 = S ex+1 +1 S /S x { 1,1} which etails I = γ S ω,1,...,1λ ω S +1 S /S ω { 1,1} = γ S +1 S +1. where the F,..., -adapted process γ is give by γ γ ad γ ω = ω/s ω, ω Ω, ω { 1,1} γ S ω,1,...,1λ ω for = 1,..., 1. I a similar fashio the th summad from the secod sum i 2.3 gives II ω Ωg γ ω γ 1 ωs ωλ ω g γ ω γ 1 ωs ωλ ω ω Ω = g γ γ 1 S where the estimate is due to 2.5 ad the covexity of g : R R ad where the last idetity is due to the adaptedess of γ, S ad to 2.6. As a cosequece, the left side of 2.3 aggregates i the above maer to L ǫ+v g F+ I II ǫ+v g F+ γ S +1 S g γ γ 1 S.
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 7 I light of our estimate 2.8 for the aalogously aggregated right side of 2.3 this shows that γ super-replicates FS with iitial capital ǫ+v g F. This accomplishes our proof. 2.4. Scalig limit. Our last result gives a dual descriptio for the scalig limit of our super-replicatio prices whe the umber of periods becomes large, stock returs are scaled by 1/ ad eared over periods of legth 1/. The limitig tradig costs will be specified i terms of a fuctio such that h : [,1 C[,1 R R + t,w,β h t w,β for ay t [,1, w C[,1, β h t w,β is oegative ad covex with h t w, = ; for ay β R the process hβ = h t w,β t [,1 is progressively measurable i the sese that h t w,β = h t w,β if w [,t = w [,t. For techical reasos we were able to establish our scalig limit oly for a suitably trucated pealty fuctio. For a give trucatio level c >, we cosider the liearly extrapolated costs h c give by { h c t w,β h t w,β for β I c h liear extrapolatio with slope c beyod I c h { } where I c h β R : h β c deotes the iterval aroud zero where the slope of h has ot yet exceeded c i absolute value. For a trucated pealty h c the dual formula of super-replicatio prices will oly ivolve measures which satisfy a certai tightess coditio; this allows us to establish the upper boud of our scalig limit i Sectio 3.2.2. For the origial h by takig c to ifiity we ca oly prove the lower boud of the super-replicatio prices, the proof for a tight upper boud remaiig a ope problem i this case. The cost for the period model with returs i are give by Ω {ω = x 1,...,x : σ/ x σ/, = 1,...,} 2.9 g,c ω,β h c/ / S ω,β where S ω C[,1 deotes the cotiuous liear iterpolatio i C[,1 of the poits S / ω s exp x m, =,...,, for ω = x 1,...,x Ω. The techical assumptio for our asymptotics to work out is the followig: Assumptio 2.4. The Legedre-Fechel trasform H : [,1 C[,1 R R with H t w,α = sup{αβ h t w,β}, t [,1, w C[,1, α R β R
8 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay has polyomial growth i w,α uiformly i t i the sese that there are costats C,p 1,p 2 such that H t w,α C1+ w p1 1+ α p2, t,w,α [,1 C[,1 R. I additio H is cotiuous i t,w ad essetially quadratic i α asymptotically, i.e., there is a fuctio Ĥ : [,1 C[,1 R + such that for ay sequece {t,w,α } =1,2,... covergig to t,w,α i [,1 C[,1 R we have Let us give two examples. lim H t w,α / Ĥtwα 2 =. Example 2.5. i Proportioal trasactio costs: Fix c > ad cosider the cost fuctios give by g,c ω,β c β for our biomial market model with tradig periods. This example was studied i [19 for biomial models ad correspods i our setup to the case Ĥ = H. ii Quadratic costs. For a give costat Λ >, let h t w,β = Λβ 2. Fix c > ad observe that our trucatio h c of h is the { h c Λβ 2 if β c w,β = 2Λ, cβ c2 4Λ, else. Thus the pealty i the step biomial model is give by { Λβ 2, if β c g,c ω,β = c β c2 4Λ, else. 2Λ, Hece the margial costs from tradig slightly higher volumes are liear for a small total tradig volume ad costat for a large oe. This example correspods to the case where H t w,β = β2 4Λ ad Ĥtw 1 4Λ. Remark 2.6. A sufficiet coditio for a limitig cost process h to satisfy our Assumptio 2.4 is the joit validity of i there exists ǫ > such that for ay t,w [,T C + [,T, the secod derivative 2 h β t,w,β exists for ay ǫwt < β < ǫwt, ad is cotiuous 2 at t,w,, ad ii we have h t,w,, ad β if if t,w [,T C + [,T β <ǫwt 2 h β2t,w,β >. Ideed, sufficiecy of these coditios ca be verified by use of a Taylor expasio. Uder Assumptio 2.4 the scalig limit for the discrete-time super-replicatio prices ca be described as follows:
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 9 Theorem 2.7. Suppose that Assumptio 2.4 holds ad that σ >. Furthermore assume that F : C[,1 R + is cotiuous with polyomial growth: FS C1+ S p, S C[,1, for some costats C,p. The we have lim V σ/ g,c,σ/ F = sup E [FS W σ σ Σc 1 Ĥ t S σ a 2 σ t dt where E W deotes the expectatio with respect to P W, the Wieer measure o C[, 1, BC[, 1, for which the caoical process W is a Browia motio, Σc is the class of processes σ o Wieer space which are progressively measurable with respect to the filtratio geerated by W ad such that aσ t c for 1 σ 2 σ 2 2 σ, σ σ, aσ, σ σ σ, 1 σ 2 σ 2 2 σ, σ σ, S σ deotes the stock price evolutio with volatility σ: t St σ s exp σ s dw s 1 t σs 2 2 ds, t 1. The proof of this result is deferred to Sectio 3.2. Oe way to iterpret Theorem 2.7 is that it describes the scalig limit of super-replicatio prices as a covex risk measure for the payoff; see [14 or [16. The class Σc parametrizes the volatility models which oe chooses to take ito accout ad the itegral term measures the relevace oe associates with the payoff s mea uder ay such model. From this perspective the most relevat models are those where the volatility stays withi the prescribed ucertaity regio [σ, σ so that the itegral term vaishes. Oe also cosiders models with higher or lower volatilities σ t, though, for as log as aσ t c, but dimiishes their relevace accordig to the average differece of their local variaces from σ 2 o the low ad σ 2 o the high side as measured by aσ t. Iparticular, thescaliglimit ofoursuper-replicatiopricesisbouded from below by the G expectatio sup σ [σ,σ E W [FS σ. I the frictioless case where h, Ĥ the pealty for choosig a volatility model with values outside the iterval [σ, σ is ifiite ad we recover the well-kow frictioless characterizatio of super-replicatio prices uder ucertaity as the payoff s G-expectatio. 3. Proofs I this sectio we carry out the proofs of Theorems 2.2 ad 2.7. 3.1. Proof of Theorem 2.2. Theorem 2.2 is cocered with the idetity VF = UF where [ EP [S F S UF sup E P FS G. P P σ,σ S As a first step we ote:
1 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay Lemma 3.1. For ay measurable F : R +1 + R + we have that VF UF. Proof. Let π = y, γ super-replicate FS. The we have FS Y π = y + γ S +1 S g k γ γ 1 S = y + γ γ 1 S S g γ γ 1 S. Takig coditioal expectatios with respect to ay P P σ,σ this shows that [ E P [FS y +E P γ γ 1 E P [S F S g γ γ 1 S [ E P [S F S = y +E P γ γ 1 S g γ γ 1 S S [ y +E P G EP [S F S S where the fial estimate follows from the defiitio of the dual fuctios G, =,...,. Sice this holds for arbitrary P P σ,σ ad ay iitial wealth y for which we ca fid a super-replicatig strategy, the precedig estimate yields VF UF. We ext observe that a idetity aalogous to UF = VF holds for multiomial models: Lemma 3.2. For k {1,2,...} cosider the fiite set Ω k {x Ω : x i = jk σ + 1 j } σ for some j {,...,k} k ad let P k σ,σ be the subset of P σ,σ which cotais those discrete probability measures that are supported by Ω k. The we have V k F = U k F where ad V k F = if{y : Y y,γ ω FSω ω Ω k for some strategy γ} U k F = sup E P [FS EP [S F S G. P P S σ,σ k Proof. For k = 1, i.e., i the biomial case, this is just Theorem 3.1 i [11. This result is proved by observig that the idetity ca be cast as a fiite dimesioal covex duality claim. The same reasoig actually applies to the multiomial setup with k > 1 as well. This establishes our claim. I a third step we argue how to pass to the limit k, first for cotiuous F:
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 11 Lemma 3.3. With the otatio of Lemma 3.2 we have 3.1 U k F UF, k = 1,2,... If F is cotiuous we have furthermore 3.2 lim if k V k F VF. Proof. Estimate 3.1 is immediate from the defiitios of U k F ad UF as P k σ,σ P σ,σ. To prove 3.2 take, for k = 1,2,..., a strategy γ k such that Y V k F+1/k, γ k FS o Ω k. We will show below that without loss of geerality we ca assume that the sequece of γ k s is uiformly bouded, i.e., 3.3 γ k C for some costat C >. ow cosider the strategies γ k γ k p k where p k : Ω Ω k is the projectio which maps ω = x 1,...,x to p k ω = ω x 1,..., x Ω k with x i max {x x i : x = jk σ + 1 j } σ for some j {,...,k}. k For ay iitial capital y, we get Y y,γk ω Yy, γk ω = γ k ωs +1ω S ω S +1 ω S ω g ω, γ k ω γ k 1 ωs ω g ω, γ k ω γ k 1 ωs ω. Because γ k C uiformly i k = 1,2,..., the first of these two sums has absolute value less tha ws, ω ω 2C where for ay fuctio f we let wf,δ, δ >, deote the modulus of cotiuity over its domai. Similarly, we get for the secod sum that its absolute value does ot exceed wg Ω [ 2Cs e σ,2cs e σ, ω ω +2CwS, ω ω. By cotiuity of S ad g, =,..., 1, both of these bouds ted to as ω ω. It follows that there are ǫ k as k such that Y y, γk y,γk ω Y ω+ǫ k for all ω ω 1/k,y R. By assumptio F is also cotiuous ad so we get FSω FS ω+wfs, ω ω Y V k F+1/k, γ k ω+wfs, ω ω Y V k F+1/k,γ k ω+ǫ k +wfs,1/k
12 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay ItfollowsthatVF V k F+1/k+ǫ k +wfs,1/kwhichimpliesourclaim3.2. It remais to prove the uiform boudedess 3.3 of the sequece γ k k=1,2,.... Clearly,y k V k F+1/k A, k = 1,2,..., forsomea >. Foray π k = y k, γ k, k = 1,2,..., we will prove by iductio over that 3.4 Y πk ω A 1+e σ ad γ k ω A 1+e σ 1 e σ S ω for ay ω = x 1,..., x Ω k ad =,1,...,. Sice S s e σ, our claim 3.4 the holds for C A 1+e σ /1 e σ s e σ. Sice each π k super-replicates a positive claim, we must have Y πk 1 i ay possible sceario. I particular, we have y k + γ k s e σ 1 ad y k + γ k s e σ 1 whichallowsustococludethat γ k A s 1 e σ. Thus3.4holdsfor. ext, assume that 3.4 holds for ad let us prove it for + 1. From the iductio assumptio we get Y πk +1 ω Y πk ω+ γ k ωs +1 ω S ω A 1+e σ + A 1+e σ 1 e σ S ω S ωe σ 1 = A 1+e σ +1, as required. Agai, the portfolio valued at time +2 should be o egative, for ay possible sceario. Thus, Y πk +1 ω+ γk +1 ωs +1 ωe σ 1 ad Y+1 ω+ πk γ +1 ωs k +1 ωe σ 1 ad so, γ +1 k ω Y+1 πk ω 1 e σ S +1 ω A 1+e σ +1 1 e σ S +1 ω. This completes the proof of 3.4. It is immediate from Lemmas 3.1 Lemma 3.3 that VF = UF for cotiuous fuctios F. For upper-semicotiuous F we ca fid cotiuous fuctios F k with sup Ω FS F k S FS such that lim sup F k Sω k FSω k,ω k ω for ay ω Ω; see, e.g., Lemma 5.3 i [12. The proof of Theorem 2.2 will thus follow from the series of iequalities VF UF limsup k UF k = limsupvf k VF k where the first iequality is due to Lemma 3.1, the last holds because F k F ad the idetity follows because our claim is already established for cotiuous F k. Hece, the oly estimate still to be show is the secod oe: Lemma 3.4. If F is approximated by F k, k = 1,2..., as above we have UF limsupuf k. k
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 13 Proof. Without loss of geerality we ca assume that UF k k=1,2,... coverges i R. By defiitio of UF k there is P k P σ,σ such that, for k = 1,2,..., 3.5 UF k 1 k E P [F k EP k[s F S S G k. S We wish to show that the limsup of the right side of 3.5 as k is ot larger tha UF. To this ed, deote by Π the set of Borel probability measures o Ω [,s e σ. Sice Ω [,s e σ is compact, so is Π whe edowed with the weak topology. ow cosider the sequece of probabilities measures i Π obtaied by cosiderig the law of Z k X,E P k[s,e P k[s F 1,...,E P k[s F uder P k for k = 1,2,... Due to Prohorov s theorem, by possibly passig to a subsequece, we ca assume without loss of geerality that this sequece coverges weakly. By Skorohod s represetatio theorem there thus exists a probability space ˆΩ, ˆF,ˆP with a ˆP-almost surely coverget sequece of radom variables Ẑk, k = 1,2,..., takig values i Ω [,s e σ, whose laws uder ˆP coicide, respectively, with those of Z k uder P k, k = 1,2,... Let Ẑ deote the ˆP-a.s. existig limit of Ẑk, k = 1,2,..., ad write it as We will show that Ẑ = ˆX,Y,...,Y. 3.6 EˆP[S ˆX ˆX 1,..., ˆX = EˆP[Y ˆX 1,..., ˆX, =,...,. By costructio of Ẑk we have for the right side of 3.5: [ E P k F k S G X, E P k[s F S S [ = EˆP F k S ˆX k G ˆX k, EˆP[S ˆX k ˆX 1 k,..., ˆX S k ˆX k S ˆX. k The ˆP-a.s. covergeceof Ẑk ad the costructio of the sequece of F k imply that the limsup k of the term iside this last expectatio is ˆP-a.s. ot larger tha FS ˆX G ˆX, Y S ˆX S ˆX where we used the lower semi-cotiuity of G. Because of the boudedess of F o compact sets ad because G, it the follows by Fatou s lemma that the limsup of the right side of 3.5 is ot larger tha EˆP [ FS ˆX G ˆX, Y S ˆX S ˆX.
14 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay From the defiitios it follows that G ω,α is adapted ad G ω, is covex. This together with the Jese iequality ad 3.6 yields that for ay < [ EˆP G ˆX, Y S ˆX S ˆX ˆX 1,..., ˆX G ˆX, EˆP[S ˆX ˆX 1,..., ˆX S ˆX S ˆX. We coclude that the limsup of the right side of 3.5 is ot larger tha [ EˆP FS ˆX G ˆX, EˆP[S ˆX ˆX 1,..., ˆX S ˆX S ˆX. Sice the distributio of ˆX is a elemet i P σ,σ, this last expectatio is ot larger tha UF as we had to show. It remais to establish 3.6. Let < ad let f : R R be a cotiuous bouded fuctio. From the domiated covergece theorem it follows that EˆP[Y f ˆX 1,..., ˆX = lim k EˆP [EˆP[S ˆX k ˆX k 1,..., ˆX k f ˆX k 1,..., ˆX k = lim k EˆP [S ˆX k f ˆX k 1,..., ˆX k =EˆP[S ˆX f ˆX 1,..., ˆX. Thus by applyig stadard desity argumets we obtai 3.6. This accomplishes our proof. 3.2. Proof of Theorem 2.7. For the proof of the asserted limit 1 3.7 lim Ĥ t S σ a 2 σ t dt V σ/,σ/ g,c F = sup E [FS W σ σ Σc we first have to go through some techical preparatios i Sectio 3.2.1 before we ca establish ad the i 3.7 i Sectios 3.2.2 ad 3.2.3, respectively. 3.2.1. Techical preparatios. Let us start by recallig that, for = 1,2,..., Ω = {ω = x 1,...,x : σ/ x σ/, = 1,...,} allows for the defiitio of the caoical process X ω = x for = 1,...,, ω = x 1,...,x Ω. We thus ca cosider the caoical filtratio F σx m,m = 1,...,, =,...,, which clearly is the same as the oe geerated by S = s exp X m, =,...,, sice X = ls ls 1, = 1,...,. Itwillbecoveiettolet, foravectory = y,...,y R +1,thefuctioy C[,1deotethecotiuouslieariterpolatioo[,1determiedbyy / = y, =,...,. This gives us, i particular, the cotiuous time aalog S t t 1 of S,...,.
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 15 Our first observatio is that the cotiuity of F allows us to write the supremum i 3.7 i differet ways: Lemma 3.5. Let deote the right side of 3.7. 3.8 i We have R sup E [FS W σ σ Σc R = sup P P σ,σ,c E P [ FS 1 1 Ĥ t S σ a 2 σ t dt Ĥ t Sa 2 d S t /St 2 dt dt where P σ,σ,c deotes the class of probabilities P o C[,1,BC[,1 uder which the coordiate process S = S t t 1 is a strictly positive martigale startig at S = s whose quadratic variatio is absolutely cotiuous with d S t a /St 2 c, t 1, P-almost surely. dt ii The supremum defiig R does ot chage whe we take it over Σc Σc, the class of progressively measurable processes σ : [,1 C[,1 R + o the Wieer space C[,1,BC[,1,P W such that There is δ > such that 3.9 σσ 2c + +δ σ 2 σσ +2c δ uiformly o [,1 C[,1 ad such that, i additio, 3.1 σ σ, o [1 δ,1 C[,1. σ is Lipschitz cotiuous o [,1 C[,1. Proof. The proof is doe similarly to the proof of Lemmas 7.1 7.2 i [11. The followig techical key lemma ca be viewed as a adaptio of Kusuoka s results from [19 o super-replicatio with proportioal trasactio costs to our ucertai volatility settig with oliear costs: Lemma 3.6. Uder the assumptios of Theorem 2.7 the followig holds true: i Let c > ad, for = 1,2,..., let Q be a probability measure o Ω,F for which 3.11 M E Q [S F, =,...,, 3.12 is close to S i the sese that Q -almost surely M S S c, =,...,. The we have 3.13 sup E Q =1,2,... [ max,..., S p < for ay p >
16 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay ad, with 3.14 Q Xm 2 +2 Mm Sm Sm Xm, =,...,, there is a subsequece, agai deoted by, such that, for,. 3.15 LawS,M,Q Q d S s Law S,S, Ss 2 P where P is a probability measure i P σ,σ,c, S is as i Lemma 3.5 i, ad where, as before, S etc. deote the cotiuous iterpolatios o [,1 iduced by the vector S = S,..., etc. ii For ay c > ad σ Σc as i Lemma 3.5 ii, there exists a sequece of probability measures Q, = 1,2,..., as i i such that the weak covergece i 3.15 holds with P LawS σ P W. I additio we get the weak covergece as 3.16 Law S,M, M S S Q LawS σ,s σ,a σ P W. Proof. Let us first focus o claim i. It obviously suffices to prove 3.13 oly for p {1,2,...}. For this we proceed similarly as Kusuoka for his claim 4.23 i [19 ad write M+1 p = M p 1+ M +1 M p = M p 1+ p j=1 M p M +1 M j M j owobservethat, whe takigthe Q -expectatio, the cotributiofromthe summad for j = 1 ca be dropped sice it has vaishig F -coditioal expectatio due to the martigale property of M uder Q. From 3.12 ad S +1 /S = expx [e σ/,e σ/, it follows that M+1 /M = 1 + O1/ where the radom O1/ -term becomes small uiformly i ad ω. Therefore the summads for j = 2,...,p are uiformly of the order O1/. Thus, we obtai [ M p [ M p +1 = 1+O1/E Q E Q ad, so upo iteratio, E Q [ M p = 1+O1/ M p. Clearly1+O1/ isboudedi. ThesameholdsforM = s 1+O1/, where we used 3.12 ad S = s. Hece, [ M p sup E Q < =1,2,... which by Doob s iequality etails that eve [ 3.17 sup =1,2,... E Q max,..., M Because of 3.12, this yields our claim 3.13. p <..
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 17 Let us ext focus o LawM Q =1,2,... for which we will verify Kolmogorov stightesscriteriosee[5oc[,1. Tothised,recallthatM +j /M +j 1 1 = O1/ ad so the quadratic variatio of M satisfies M +l M = l E Q [M+j M+j 1 2 F+j 1 j=1 = max M 2 Ol/. From the Burkholder Davis Gudy iequality ad the boud 3.17 we thus get E Q [M +l M 4 = Ol/ 2 which readily gives Kolmogorov s criterio for our cotiuous iterpolatios M, = 1,2,... Havig established tightess, we ca fid a subsequece, agai deoted by, such that LawM Q =1,2,... coverges to the law of a cotiuous process M o a suitable probability space ˆΩ, ˆF,ˆP. We will show ext that this process M is a strictly positive martigale. I fact, by Skorohod s represetatio theorem, we ca assume that there are processes ˆM, = 1,2,..., o ˆΩ, ˆF,ˆP with LawM Q = Law ˆM ˆP which coverge ˆP-almost surely to M as. It is the immediate from 3.17 that the martigale property of M uder Q gives the martigale property of ˆM uder ˆP. To see that M is strictly positive we follow Kusuoka s argumet for 4.24 ad 4.25 i his paper [19 ad establish [ sup E Q max lm 2 3.18 < =1,2,...,..., sicethisetailsthe ˆP-itegrabilityofmax t 1 lm t byfatou slemma. For3.18 recall that M m/m m 1 = 1+O1/ uiformly i m ad ω. This allows us to use Taylor s expasio to obtai lm m lm m 1 = M m M m 1 M m 1 +O1/. Upo summatio over m = 1,...,, this gives i cojuctio with M = s 1+ O1/ : M max,..., lm m M m 1 max,..., Mm 1 +O1. Hece E Q [ max,..., lm 2 2E Q max 8E Q,..., [ M m Mm 1 M m 1 Mm Mm 1 Mm 1 2 2 +O1 +O1,
18 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay where for the secod estimate we used Doob s iequality for the martigale give by the sum for which we take the maximum i the above expressio. Recallig agai that M m /M m 1 1 = O1/ uiformly i m ad ω the above expectatio is of order O1 ad we obtai 3.18. Let us fially tur to the weak covergece 3.13 ad itroduce, for = 1,2,..., the auxiliary discrete stochastic itegrals Y Mm M m 1 Sm 1, =,...,. By applyig Theorem 4.3 i [13, 3.12 3.13 ad the already established weak covergece of LawM Q =1,2,... o C[,1, we deduce the weak covergece Law 1,M[t,Y 3.19 [t S [t Law 1 M t,m t,y t t 1 Q t 1 ˆP as o the Skorohod space D[,1 D[,1 D[,1 where Y. dm s/m s. Hece, M = M expy Y /2 ad, i particular, lm = Y. Moreover, agai by Skorohod s represetatio theorem, we ca assume that there are processes 1/Ŝ, ˆM ad Ŷ o ˆΩ, ˆF,ˆP whose joit law uder ˆP coicides with that i 3.19 ad which coverge ˆP-almost surely to 1/M, M, ad Y, respectively. ow, recallig that X m σ/ we ca Taylor expad e x = 1 + x + x 2 /2 + Ox 3 so that with 3.12 we ca write M m M m 1 S m 1 = 1+ M m Sm M Sm e X m m 1 Sm 1 = M m S m M m 1 S m 1 +Xm + 1 2 X m 2 + M m S m Sm Xm +O1/ 3. Thus, with Q as defied i 3.14, we obtai upo summig over m = 1,...,: Y = M S M S +ls ls + 1 2 Q +O1/. I terms of Ŷ, ˆM, ad ˆQ Q [t t 1 this amouts to Ŷ t = ˆM t Ŝ t ˆM Ŝ +lŝ t ls + 1 2 ˆQ t +O1/ for t {,1/,...,1}. Sice all other terms i this expressio coverge ˆP-almost surely as, so does ˆQ ad its limit is give by lim ˆQ t = 2Y t lm t +ls = Y t = lm t t 1.
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 19 ow, fix s < t 1 ad observe that lm t lm s = lim ˆQ t ˆQ s = lim [s< [t ˆX X +2M S S [σσ 2c + t s,σσ +2ct s. Hece, l M is absolutely cotiuous with desity which readily implies d lm t dt [σσ 2c +,σσ +2c, t 1, d lm t a c. dt ItthusfollowsthatP LawM ˆPliesitheclassP σ,σ,c ascosideredilemma3.5i. Bythecostructioad ˆP-almostsurecovergeceofŜM, ˆM, ˆQ,thisproves3.15 for this P. Let us ow tur to the proof of item ii of our lemma ad take a σ : [,1 C[,1 R from the class Σc itroduced i Lemma 3.5. Fix {1,2,...} ad defie o Ω the processes σ, κ, B, ad ξ by the followig recursio: ad, for = 1,...,, σ σ σ σ, B σ σ σ 1/B σ, κ 1 σ2 1/ B 2 σ 1, 2 ξ ls ls 1 σ 1 = X /σ, B B 1 + exp 1+κ X κ 1 X 1 1. 1+2κ σ Observe that the progressive measurability of σ esures that its evaluatio i the defiitio of σ ad κ depeds o B = B m m=,..., oly via its already costructed values for m =,..., 1. ext, defie the process q by 3.2 q = expκ 1X 1 exp 1+κ σ / exp1+κ σ / exp 1+κ σ /. Cosider the probability measure P o Ω,F for which the radom variables ξ1,...,ξ are i.i.d. with P ξ1 = 1 = P ξ1 = 1 = 1/2. From 3.1 it follows that there exists ǫ > for which κ > ǫ 1/2. Thus B B 1 = O/2 ad also κ κ 1 = O 1/2 because of the Lipschitz cotiuity of σ. We
2 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay coclude that, for sufficietly large, q,1 P -almost surely. For such we cosider Q give by the Rado-ikodym derivatives dq dp F = 2 q m I {ξ m =1} +1 q mi {ξ m = 1}. Sice P [ξ = ±1 = 1/2, our choice of q 3.2 esures that B is a martigale uder Q. ow cosider the stochastic process M S expκ X, =,...,. From 3.1 it follows that κ = for sufficietly large ad so M = S. Furthermore, from 3.9 we have M S S c. Observe also that 3.21 M = M 1 1+ 1+2κ σ B B 1 Hece, the predictability of σ, κ esures that, alog with B, also M is a martigale uder Q. Hece M ad Q are as requested i part i of our preset lemma. It thus remais to establish the weak covergece 3.16. By applyig Taylor s expasio we get q κ 1 σ 1 ξ 1 +1+κ σ = O/2 P -almost surely 21+κ σ Thus, 2q 1ξ 1 κ 1 σ 1 1+κ σ equality ad the defiitio of the measure Q we get that E Q [ 1+κ σ ξ κ 1σ 1ξ 1 2 F 1. = O 1/2 P -almost surely. From the last =σ 2 1+κ 2 +σ 1 2 κ 1 2 22q 11+κ σ κ 1 σ 1 ξ 1 =σ 2 1+2κ +O/2. This together with applyig the Taylor expasio yields E Q [ B B 1 2 F 1 = 1 +O 3/2. From Theorem 8.7 i [1 we get the covergece of LawB Q to Wieer measure o C[, 1. From the cotiuity of σ it follows that the cotiuous iterpolatio o [,1 of { 1+2κ σ }, i.e., the process σ [t/b uder Q coverges i law to σ uder P W o C[,1. Thus Theorem 5.4 i [13 ad 3.21 give the covergece LawB,M Q LawW,S σ P W o the space C[,1 C[,1. Fially, observe that we have the joit covergece LawS,M, κ σ Q LawS σ,s σ,a σ P W as o C[,1 C[,1 C[,1 ad 3.16 follows as required.
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 21 3.2.2. Proof of i 3.7. Applyig Theorem 2.2 with g g,c of 2.9 shows that for = 1,2,... there exists a measure Q o Ω,F such that [ 3.22 V σ/,σ/ F 1 g,c +E Q F S M G,c S where G,c is the Legedre-Fechel trasform of g,c ad where M is defied as i Lemma 3.6. Sice by costructio h c ad, thus, also g,c has maximum slope c, we have { G,c α = H / S,α if α c, otherwise. I particular, the above sequece of probabilities Q =1,2,... is as required i the first part of Lemma 3.6. We thus obtai the weak covergece 3.15 with some probability P P σ,σ,c. DuetoSkorohod srepresetatiotheoremthereexistsaprobabilityspaceˆω, ˆF,ˆP with processes Ŝ, ˆM, ad ˆQ, = 1,2,... ad a cotiuous martigale M > such that 3.23 3.24 ad such that LawS,M,Q Q = LawŜ, ˆM, ˆQ ˆP, = 1,2,..., LawS P = LawM ˆP, 3.25 Ŝ, ˆM, ˆQ M,M, lm ˆP-almost surely as. Due to 3.13 of Lemma 3.6, max t 1 Ŝt is bouded i L p ˆP for ay p >. By Lebesgue s theorem the assumed cotiuity ad polyomial growth of F i cojuctio with 3.23 ad 3.25 thus suffices to coclude that 3.26 E Q [ F Below we will argue that 3.27 lim if E Q [ S EˆP [FM as. M G,c S 1 S EˆP[ Ĥ t Ma 2 d lm t dt. dt Combiig 3.22 with 3.26 ad 3.27 the gives [ 3.28 lim sup V σ/,σ/ g F,c EˆP FM 1 S Ĥ t Ma 2 d lm t dt Because of 3.24 the right side of 3.28 ca be viewed as oe of the expectatios cosidered i 3.8. We deduce from Lemma 3.5 i that holds i 3.7. Let us coclude by provig 3.27 ad write 3.29 where E Q [ G,c M S 1 = EˆP[ S dt Ŝ H [t/, t / dt. c t ˆM [t/ Ŝ [t/ c. Ŝ [t/
22 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay Let b : R R be a covex fuctio such that bu = a 2 u for u, for istace u, u σ 2, 3.3 bu 1 σ 2 u 2 4 σ, σ 2 < u <, 2 a u 2, u. By Assumptio 2.4 ad the ˆP-almost Ŝ sure covergece of Ŝ to M, the itegrad H [t/, / coverges uiformly i t [,1 ad [ c,c to ĤtM 2. Moreover, from Lemma 3.7 below we have t 2 b ˆQ [t/. Hece, the limif i 3.27 is bouded from below by 3.31 lim if EˆP [ 1 [ 1 Ĥ t M t 2 dt limif EˆP Ĥ t Mb ˆQ [t/ dt. From their defiitio it follows that the processes ˆQ [t/ t 1, = 1,2,... take values i the iterval [σ 2 2cσ,σ 2 +2cσ, ad so they are bouded uiformly. Hece, we ca use Lemma A1.1 i [1 to fid, for = 1,2,..., covex combiatios δ of elemets i this sequece of processes with idex i {, +1,...} which coverge ˆP dt-almost every. Deote the limit process by δ t t 1. Observe that t δ u du = lim t ˆQ [u/ du = lm t ad so we coclude that δ t = d lm t /dt, ˆP dt-almost every. Hece, by Fatou s lemma, [ 1 EˆP Ĥ t Ma 2 [ 1 δ t dt = EˆP Ĥ t Mbδ t dt [ 1 limif EˆP Ĥ t Mbδ t dt. By covexity of b ad by the costructio of δ this last limif is ot larger tha the limif o the right side of 3.31. Hece, we ca combie these estimates to obtai our assertio 3.27. 3.2.3. Proof of i 3.7. Because of Lemma 3.5 it suffices to show that [ 1 3.32 lim if F E FS σ P W Ĥ S σ t a 2 σ t dt V σ/,σ/ g,c for σ Σc. For such σ, we ca apply Lemma 3.6ii which provides us with probabilities Q ad martigales M o Ω,F, = 1,2,..., such that 3.33 Law S,M, M S S Q Law S σ,s σ,a σ P W as. We ca ow use Skorohod s represetatio theorem exactly as i Sectio 3.2.2 to obtai, i aalogy with 3.26, that [ 3.34 E Q F S [ E P W F S σ as.
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 23 Set c t ˆM [t/ Ŝ [t/ Ŝ [t/ I aalogy with 3.29 we have that [ M lim E Q G,c S 3.35 = lim E Q 1 = E P W[ [ 1 S c. Ŝ H [t/, t / dt Ĥ t S σ a 2 σ t dt, where the last two equalities follow from our assumptios o H, the momet estimate i Lemma 3.6 which gives uiform itegrability ad 3.33 together with the Skorohod represetatio theorem. Combiig 3.34 with 3.35 the allows us to write the right side of 3.32 as [ 1 E FS σ P W Ĥ S σ t a 2 σ t dt = lim E Q [ F S M G,c S S. O the other had, Theorem 2.2 reveals that such a limit is a lower boud for the left side of 3.32. This accomplishes our proof that holds i 3.7 We complete the sectio with the followig elemetary iequality which we used i the previous proof: Lemma 3.7. For x,y R such that x [σ,σ we have where b deotes the fuctio of 3.3. bx 2 +2xy y 2, Proof. We distiguish four cases: i x 2 +2xy σ 2. I this case x 2 +2xy σ 2 2xy 2σ y ad so bx 2 +2xy = 1 x 2 +2xy σ 2 2 4 σ 2 y 2. ii σ 2 x 2 + 2xy σ 2. I this case bx 2 + 2xy = ad the statemet is trivial. iii x 2 +2xy σ 2. Set z = x 2 +2xy. Assume that z is fixed ad itroduce the fuctio f z u = z u2 u, u σ 2. Observe that for z [ σ 2,σ 2 the derivative f zu = 1 z 2 /u 2 ad so bx 2 +2xy = 1 4 f zσ 2 1 4 f zx 2 = y 2. iv Fially, assume that x 2 +2xy σ 2. Clearly x 2 +2xy +y 2 ad so bx 2 +2xy = x 2 2xy y 2.
24 P.Bak, Y.Dolisky ad S.Gökay Refereces [1 D. Aldous, Weak covergece of stochastic processes for processes viewed i the strasbourg maer, Upublished Mauscript, Statis. Laboratory Uiv. Cambridge, 1981. [2 P. Bak ad D. Baum, Hedgig ad portfolio optimizatio i fiacial markets with a large trader, Math. Fiace 14, 1 18, 24. [3 B. Bouchard ad M. utz, Arbitrage ad Duality i odomiated Discrete- Time Models, Aals of Applied Probability, 25, 823 859, 215. [4 B. Bouchard ad M. utz, Cosistet Price Systems uder Model Ucertaity, preprit, 214. [5.. Chetsov, Weak covergece of stochastic processes whose trajectories have o discotiuities of the secod kid ad the heuristic approach to the Kolmogorov Smirov tests, Theory Probab. Appl, 1, 14-144, 1957. [6 U. Çeti, R. Jarrow ad P. Protter, Liquidity risk ad arbitrage pricig theory, Fiace ad Stoch. 8, 311 341, 24. [7 Y. Dolisky Hedgig of Game Optios uder Model Ucertaity i Discrete Time, Electroic Commuicatio i Probability 214. [8 S. Deparis ad C. Martii, Superhedgig Strategies ad Balayage i Discrete Time, Proceedigs of the 4th Ascoa Coferece o Stochastic Aalysis, 24. [9 L. Deis ad C. Martii, A Theoretical Framework for the Pricig of Cotiget Claims i the Presece of Model Ucertaity, A. Appl. Probab. 16, 827 852, 26. [1 F. Delbae ad W. Schachermayer, A geeral versio of the fudametal theorem of asset pricig, Math. Aale. 3, 463 52, 1994. [11 Y. Dolisky ad H.M. Soer, Duality ad Covergece for Biomial Markets with Frictio, Fiace ad Stochastics. 17,447 475, 213. [12 Y. Dolisky ad H.M. Soer, Robust Hedgig with the Proportioal Trasactio Costs, to appear i Fiace ad Stochastics. [13 D. Duffie ad P. Protter, From Discrete to Cotiuous Time Fiace: Weak Covergece of the Fiacial Gai Process, Mathematical Fiace. 2, 1 15, 1992. [14 H. Föllmer ad A. Schied, Covex measures of risk ad tradig costraits, Fiace ad Stochastics 6, o. 4, 22, 429 447 [15 H. Föllmer ad A. Schied, Stochastic Fiace, de Gruyter 24 [16 M. Frittelli ad E. Rosazza Giai, Puttig order i risk measures, Joural of Bakig ad Fiace, 26 22, 1473 1486. [17 S. Gokay ad H.M. Soer, Çeti Jarrow Protter model of liquidity i a biomial market, Mathematical Fiace. 22, 25-276, 212. [18 D. Hobso, Volatility mis-specificatio, optio pricig ad super-replicatio via couplig, Aals of Applied Probability, 8 1998, 193 25. [19 S. Kusuoka, Limit Theorem o Optio Replicatio Cost with Trasactio Costs, A. Appl. Probab. 5, 198 221, 1995. [2 T.J. Lyos, Ucertai volatility ad the risk-free sythesis of derivatives, Applied Mathematical. Fiace, 2, 1995, 117 133. [21 S. Levetal ad A.V. Skorohod, O the possibility of hedgig optios i the presece of trasactio costs. A. Appl. Probab. 72, 41 443, 1997. [22 M. utz, H.M. Soer, Superhedgig ad Dyamic Risk Measures uder Volatility Ucertaity, SIAM Joural o Cotrol ad Optimizatio, 5, 265 289,
oliear trasactio costs ad volatility ucertaity 25 212. [23 S. Peg. Multi-dimesioal G-Browia motio ad related stochastic calculus uder G-expectatio, Stochastic Process. Appl., 11812, 2223 2253, 28. [24 H.M. Soer, S.E. Shreve ad J. Cvitaic, There is o otrivial hedgig portfolio for optio pricig with trasactio costs, Aals of Applied Prob., 5/2, 327 355, 1995. [25 H.M. Soer,. Touzi, ad J. Zhag, Martigale represetatio theorem for the G expectatio, Stochastic. Processes. Appl., 2 211, 265 287. Departmet of Mathematics, TU Berli, e.mail: bak@math.tu-berli.de Departmet of Statistics, Hebrew Uiversity of Jerusalem, e.mail: ya.yolisky@mail.huji.ac.il Departmet of Mathematics, TU Berli, e.mail: gokay@math.tu-berli.de