RECENT AMENDMENTS TO DEBT RESTRUCTURING AND BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS Furio Samela, Partner Watson Farley & Williams Shipping and the Law 2015
Urgent measures on, inter alia, Italian bankruptcy law New rules on interim financing New rules on debt restructuring agreements Changes to preventative composition with creditors Changes to the winding-up plan Slide 2
New rules on interim financing Article 182-quinquies of the Italian bankruptcy law already allowed a debtor, filing an application for preventative composition with creditors (including the so-called concordato in bianco ), to request the authorisation of the competent Court to enter into super senior loan agreements, provided that certain requirements are met. The amended Article 182-quinquies of the Italian bankruptcy law: does no longer require an independent expert report which can be time consuming; the debtor is only obliged to ensure that the relevant application meets certain criteria; the debtor, apart from new financings, can also request the authorisation to maintain/continue to use linee di credito autoliquidanti (trade receivables credit line); the debtor, apart from granting pledges and mortgages as security, is also entitled to assign receivables as security for such financings; the Court shall consult with, inter alios, the main creditors without formalities; and the Court shall decide within 10 days of the filing of the application. Slide 3
New rules on debt restructuring agreements Large number of creditors, different and conflicting interests in the restructuring process and the consequent length of the negotiations, all play a significant role in the outcome of the debt restructuring agreements. Article 182-septies provides that, within the context of financial restructuring agreements whereby the aggregate amount of claims vis-à-vis banks and financial intermediaries is at least equal to 50% of the company s overall indebtedness, the debtor can request to the Court that the effects of the agreement be extended also to those financial creditors (belonging to the same class of creditors) who have not given their approval provided that the following conditions are met. Slide 4
New rules on debt restructuring agreements Crammed down financial creditors shall have the same legal position and economic interest as the adhering financial creditors Financial creditors that have approved the debt restructuring agreement shall represent at least 75% of the indebtedness in that class Crammed down financial creditors can be better satisfied, under the agreement, than with the other alternatives Crammed down financial creditors shall have received updated information on the assets, financial and economic conditions of the debtor and shall have been enabled to participate to the negotiations Negotiations shall have been conducted in good faith Slide 5
New rules on debt restructuring agreements Standstill agreements Where a standstill agreement has been executed by the debtor with one or more financial creditors and the standstill agreement has been approved with a majority of 75% of the credits owed to banks and financial intermediaries belonging to the same class of financial creditors, then that standstill agreement will also apply to the non-adhering (or dissenting) financial creditors, provided that certain conditions are met. The non-adhering (or dissenting) financial creditors can challenge the proposed extension/application of the standstill agreement within 30 days of the notice whereby they are informed of the execution of same and they have been provided with the certification of the expert. The competent Court shall then provide its reasoned judgment in relation to the challenge which can be appealed before the Court of Appeal within 15 days. Slide 6
New rules on debt restructuring agreements Standstill agreements In no event can any such standstill or other similar agreement impose any new obligation on the non-adhering (or dissenting) creditors or require that they provide any additional performance, grant new financing, continue to make available financing already granted or advance new funds. In order to prevent any abuse deriving from the use of this new provisions, the scope of criminal liability for fraudulent bankruptcy has been broadened so as to cover any fraudulent action by the debtor in obtaining approval of the debt restructuring agreement or the execution of the standstill agreement. Slide 7
Changes to preventative composition with creditors Creditors can now submit alternative preventative composition with creditors proposals/plans which will compete with those of the debtor provided that the following conditions are met. The debtor s proposal shall provide for the payment of less than a) 40% of unsecured debt in case of liquidation or b) 30% of unsecured debt in case of continuation of business. The competing proposal shall be submitted by one or more creditors representing at least 10% of the credits already accrued as provided in the estate report (situazione patrimoniale) of the debtor filed with the Court. In order to prevent abuses, the proposal cannot be submitted by individuals or entities controlled, controlling or under common control of the debtor. Slide 8
Changes to preventative composition with creditors The alternative proposal may contemplate an investment by third parties in the debtor, also by way of capital increase with the exclusion or limitation of the option right (diritto di opzione). In case of failure by the debtor to implement the proposed actions in compliance with the approved restructuring plan, the Court can appoint a judicial commissioner to step in, call the extraordinary shareholders meeting of the debtor to approve the capital increase and exercise the voting rights in lieu of the debtor s shareholders. These rules will create new opportunities for arrangements between the company, its shareholders and the creditors, which will also be protected from abuses by the debtor in consideration of the new powers granted to the judicial commissioner. Slide 9
Changes to the winding-up plan The winding-up plan, under the amended article 104-ter, must be drafted within 180 days of the adjudication in bankruptcy. Unjustified failure to comply within such term will lead to the revocation of the bankruptcy receiver s appointment. The winding-up plan must specify the date by which the assets will be liquidated, to be not later than 2 years of the filing of the judgment adjudicating the company in bankruptcy, or any such longer period, for certain specific assets, that the bankruptcy receiver may deem necessary to the extent that the receiver provides reasonable justification for the extension of the time bar in relation to such assets. Slide 10
Conclusions The new insolvency provisions allow creditors to take on an active, even proactive, role, rather than passively waiting for the procedures to come to a possible conclusion. Creditors will now be able to contribute to the success of the debtor s restructuring. Furthermore, the possibility for the debtor to access new financing without the need of the expert s certification and the introduction of the new debt restructuring agreement with financial creditors are very welcomed reforms which should solve the issues which have sometime prejudiced the successful conclusion of a restructuring process because of the opposition of a minority of non-adhering/dissenting creditors. Finally, the new time bars for the approval of the winding-up plan (and sale of the relevant assets) should reduce the duration of the bankruptcy proceedings. Slide 11
WFW Offices ATHENS FRANKFURT MADRID PARIS 6th Floor, Building B 348 Syngrou Avenue Kallithea 176-74, Athens T: +30 210 455 7300 Ulmenstraβe 37-39 60325 Frankfurt am Main T: +49 69 297 291 0 C/ María de Molina, 4 28006 Madrid T: +34 91 515 6300 26 avenue des Champs-Elysées 75008 Paris T: +33 1 56 88 21 21 BANGKOK HAMBURG MILAN ROME Unit 902, 9th Floor GPF Witthayu Tower B 93/1 Wireless Road Patumwan, Bangkok 10330 T: +66 2665 7800 Jungfernstieg 51 20354 Hamburg T: +49 40 800 084 0 Piazza del Carmine 4 20121 Milan T: +39 02 721 7071 Piazza Navona 49 00186 Rome T: +39 06 684 0581 DUBAI HONG KONG MUNICH SINGAPORE Office 1503, Level 15, Tower 2 Al Fattan Currency House PO Box 506896 Dubai T: +971 4 278 2300 Units 1703-1707, One Pacific Place 88 Queensway, Hong Kong T: +852 2168 6700 Gewürzmühlstraβe 11 Courtyard 80538 Munich T: +49 89 237 086 0 6 Battery Road #28-00 Singapore 049909 T: +65 6532 5335 LONDON NEW YORK 15 Appold Street London EC2A 2HB T: +44 20 7814 8000 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 T: +1 212 922 2200 Slide 12
ATHENS BANGKOK DUBAI FRANKFURT HAMBURG HONG KONG LONDON MADRID MILAN MUNICH NEW YORK PARIS ROME SINGAPORE All references to Watson Farley & Williams and the firm in this presentation mean Watson Farley & Williams LLP and/or its Affiliated Undertakings. Any reference to a partner means a member of Watson Farley & Williams LLP, or a member or partner in an WFW Affiliated Entities, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualification. This presentation constitutes attorney advertising. wfw.com