The Potential Impact of Tolling on I-70

Similar documents
$1,516 $925 $19 $2,460 $422 $1,270 $261 $413 $94 = $715 = $274 = $62 = $13 = $555 = $19 = $148 & HWY

Financial Snapshot October 2014

Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce

TECHNICAL PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA 3/18/2015; ITEM II.B. Amendment Number Four to the FY Transportation Improvement Program

A Project for The Good Roads Foundation. Arkansas Statewide Likely Voter Survey December 12-13,

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING IN THE STATES

Increased Transportation Infrastructure Investment Critical to State s Continued Economic Development

Scott E. Bennett, P.E. Director. Conway Businesss Expo

Randy Ort Assistant Chief - Administration. Southwest Arkansas Transportation

Financial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri

Changes in Fuel Tax Policy and the Impact on State and Federal Revenue

2017 Educational Series FUNDING

Estimated Financial Summary for the Highway and Bridge Construction Schedule

RPM Presentation #2. Slide 1:

Transportation Funding State Comparisons. 21 st Century Transportation Committee August 21, 2008

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED OCTOBER 15, 2018

NRI COMMITTEE SESSION

Danny Straessle. Public Information Officer. Paragould Chamber of Commerce

Meeting Future Transportation Funding Needs

Other States Models. House Select Committee on Strategic Transportation Planning and Long Term Funding Solutions.

California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives. Follow this and additional works at:

MTC OVERVIEW OF SB 1 (BEALL AND FRAZIER)

Interested Parties William E. Hamilton Transportation Needs and Revenue Distribution

23 USC 601. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

Study of Indiana Transportation Infrastructure Funding Mechanisms

Transportation Funding in the Charlotte Region

Stabilizing Missouri s Highway Funding Tom Kruckemeyer, Chief Economist Amy Blouin, Executive Director

Chairman Wathan Spade, Executive Director

STATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

Danny Straessle Public Information Officer ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1049

MOTOR VEHICLE HIGHWAY DISTRIBUTION FORMULA

STUDY SCHEDULE STUDY PURPOSE

Session of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Assessment and Taxation 3-7

P.L.2016, CHAPTER 56, approved October 14, 2016 Assembly, No. 10 (Fourth Reprint)

Indiana Transportation Funding Update

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget

Bringing Virginia s Transportation Funding Up to Speed. August 25, 2014 John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

Overview of State Highway Fund 0006 Revenues and Allocations, the Texas Mobility Fund, and the Texas Rail Relocation and Improvement Fund

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local

REVISED PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. LCB File No. R July 17, 2014

STATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1726

Mobility Fee Legislation

CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY

A Citizen s Guide to Transportation in Missouri. Patrick K. McKenna, Director Missouri Department of Transportation January 2017

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED NOVEMBER 13, 2014

Transportation Revenue Options and State Funding Initiatives

21 st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee

A New Model for Funding Transportation Virginia s Sales Tax Approach

Addressing Virginia s Transportation Needs: A 3-Step Process. Delegate S. Chris Jones Southern Legislative Conference July 19, 2015

IMPACT FEE CREDIT APPLICATION & GUIDELINES

Item # Action. SACOG Board of Directors. Support for SB 16 Transportation Funding

Transportation Funding Overview. Travis Brouwer, ODOT Assistant Director House Transportation Policy Committee March 8, 2017

Intersection Between Oregon s System of Highway Funding and Potential Carbon Policies

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH70631-LBxz-401T (1/22) Short Title: Congestion Relief/Intermodal Transport Fund.

Table of Contents. Study Overview. Corridor Needs Analysis. Financial Strategies. Legislative Review

Governor s Working Group on Highway Funding Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017

Briefing Points for Revenue Alternatives, FY 2009 Mary E. Forsberg, Research Director February 2008

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill Nos and 1960

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 S 3 SENATE BILL 20 Finance Committee Substitute Adopted 2/10/15 Third Edition Engrossed 2/12/15

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2800 CHAPTER... AN ACT

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF GREATER INVESTMENTS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE S TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDED BY AN INCREASE IN THE GAS TAX

Proposition 101 Income, Vehicle, and Telecommunication Taxes and Fees

75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2001

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 20

Proposal 15-1: Sales and Motor Fuel Tax Increases

Technical Aspects of Missouri s TDD Act KC Streetcar Implementation

Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) Tax Credit

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Taxation 5-4

RIDOT The Ten Year Plan, Asset Management, and Innovation Moving Ahead in the 21 st Century

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

(4) facilities for the furnishing of water, (6) solid waste disposal facilities, (7) qualified residential rental projects,

Economic Impact and Policy Analysis of Four Michigan Transportation Investment Proposals

American Council of Engineering Companies

September 10, Estimate of Additional Annual Construction and Maintenance Dollars Needed Scenario 1

SB 1: Debunking the Myths

RECEIVED On in I #2. 3tPm

Material Comparison ( ) County Engineer s Cost Saving Methods/ Grants How would increased revenues be used?

Referendum 51 Gets Us Moving, Safely, Again

CHAPTER 4 1 Transportation Financial Analysis

Technical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs

Senate Bill No. 1 Committee of the Whole

Total Current Revenue: $450 million Current need: $1.12 Billion Funding Deficiency: 60%

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation

Analysis of Regional Transportation Spending

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT HILLS TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE (# ) TO REPEAL SENATE BILL 1 THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

Financing Transportation Infrastructure:

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

April 25, Martin Klepper Executive Director

WHAT A 25-CENT FEDERAL GAS TAX INCREASE WOULD LOOK LIKE IN EACH STATE

Transcription:

The Greater Warren County EDC The Potential Impact of Tolling on I-70 What Warren County Needs to Know

EFFORTS OF THE EDC Jobs: 318 new 80 retained Wages: 135% of county average wage Investments: $113.8M confirmed

I-70 Economic Benefit 49% of Missouri s Employers 63% of Missouri s Jobs 61% of Missouri s Population WITHIN 30 MILES OF INTERSTATE 70 The backbone of our State s economy

The Current Situation Options for Enacting Tolls Legislative Authority Voter Approval Public Private Partnerhsips PPP(P 3 )

The MoDOT Plan MoDOT received a waiver from the Federal Highway Administration in 2005 to impose and collect tolls on the I-70 corridor (MO,VA,NC) Governor Nixon requested in 2014 that MoDOT develop a plan for tolling I-70

FAST ACT-Fixing America s Surface Transportation Subsection (c) of Section (1411) of H.R. 22. (c) Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program- Section 1216(b) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (Public Law 105-178) is amended-- (A) GENERAL TERM FOR EXPIRATION OF PROVISIONAL APPLICATION- An application provisionally approved by the Secretary under this subsection shall expire 3 years after the date on which the application was provisionally approved if the State has not-- i. submitted a complete application to the Secretary that fully satisfies the eligibility criteria under paragraph (3) and the selection criteria under paragraph (4); iv. the State has the authority required for the project to proceed. ii. completed the environmental review and permitting process under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for the pilot project; and iii. executed a toll agreement with the Secretary. (B) EXCEPTIONS TO EXPIRATION- Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the Secretary may extend the provisional approval for not more than 1 additional year if the State demonstrates material progress toward implementation of the project as evidenced by-- i. substantial progress in completing the environmental review and permitting process for the pilot project under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); ii. funding and financing commitments for the pilot project; iii. expressions of support for the pilot project from State and local governments, community interests, and the public; and iv. submission of a facility management plan pursuant to paragraph (3)(D). (C) CONDITIONS FOR PREVIOUSLY PROVISIONALLY APPROVED APPLICATIONS- A State with a provisionally approved application for a pilot project as of the date of enactment of the FAST Act shall have 1 year after that date of enactment to meet the requirements of subparagraph (A) or receive an extension from the Secretary under subparagraph (B), or the application will expire.

The Greater Warren County EDC How Did We Get To This Point? What Warren County Needs to Know

Recent History of Transportation Funding 2014 Amendment 7: three-quarters of one percent sales tax to be used solely to fund state and local highways, roads, bridges and transportation projects for ten years. Would produce $480 million annually to the state's Transportation Safety and Job Creation Fund and $54 million for local governments. 2004 Amendment 3, which requires all revenues collected from the sale of motor vehicles come to MoDOT. It requires the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission to issue bonds for building highway and bridge projects and uses these additional revenues to pay back the bonds 2002 Legislation is passed extending the 6-cents-per-gallon motor-fuel tax, which was due to expire in 2008. Proposition B-a 4-cent per gallon increase in fuel taxes and general sales tax of ½ % was defeated 2000 Legislation was passedallowing MoDOT to issue $2.25 billion in bond financing to accelerate highway improvements. MoDOT can issue up to $500 million per year in bond financing through the year 2006. 1992 A 6-cent per gallon increase in the motor fuel tax is passed by the Legislature. The 6 cents is to be phased in over a 5-year period; 2 cents in 1992, 2 cents in 1994 and 2 cents in 1996. 1987 Proposition A, a constitutional amendment to increase the motor fuel tax by 4 cents per gallon,

How Missouri Compares to Surrounding States Missouri has more than 34,000 miles of state-owned and maintained roads Missouri has 10,400 bridges to maintain Missouri has 268,201 lane miles of road surface Missouri is the 7th largest system in U.S. Missouri ranks 45th in state gas tax rate (2014)

State Comparison of Fuel Taxes Missouri (17c, State) 35.40 gas Last raised 1996 41.40 diesel Last raised 1997 US Average 48.69 gas 54.41 diesel Federal Rates 18.40 gas 24.40 diesel

Fuel Consumption 3,500 3,000 Millions of gallons 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 Gasoline Diesel - 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

The Result Revenue has not kept pace with construction costs Consumption flat No tax increase Debt service of 2000-2006 bonds and Amendment 3 using a portion of available funds Construction budget is projected to be ¼ of the high point in 2009. Construction funding primarily for maintenance of the existing system Looking for alternative funding and strategies for large projects, i.e I-70

The Greater Warren County EDC Why Oppose Tolling on I-70? What Warren County Needs to Know

The Potential Impact All merchandise shipped in will have a toll mark up. All workers entering & leaving the County (57% of workforce) will be tolled twice daily. Warren County will become non-competitive with surrounding counties for attracting jobs Warren County will no longer be considered a location of choice for new residential development A toll will have a negative impact on economic growth, businesses, jobs, housing values, and retail sales which will impact the tax base All personal, social, family, sports, lake, Mizzou trips will be affected by tolls. Impact on secondary roads and communities will be significant

The Potential Costs Cost of Commuting to/from St. Charles $3.00/day $780/year Cost to attend Mizzou game $19.50 Cost to go to Lake of Ozarks $13.50 Cost to go to Montgomery City $5.40 Cost to/from Warrenton to Wright City $2.10 Cost to go to St. Louis $3.00 Cost to go to Kansas City $57.00 * Based on MoDOT estimate of $.15 per mile roundtrip estimate PLUS YOU STILL WILL PAY FUEL TAXES Truck toll to deliver to/from St. Louis $9.00 Truck toll to deliver to/from Columbia $58.50 Truck toll to deliver to/from Kansas City $153.00 * Based on MoDOT estimate of $.45 per mile

Toll Rates Comparison

Public Private Partnerships What they are: Private firms that finance, design, build, operate and maintain publicly owned assets How they work: They control a publicly owned asset through a long term lease and charge a fee to use the asset that will recover their costs plus profits Who are they: Often times they are conglomerates that are largely funded by foreign interests. Through 2013, 5 long term lease agreements (P3s) have been executed in the U.S. Facility Length Terms Costs Notes Chicago Skyway-IL Pocahontas Parkway-VA Indiana Toll Road-IN Northwest Parkway-CO 7.8 miles 99 years $.57 to $4.52 per mile 8.8 miles 99 years $.36 to $.82 per mile 157 miles 75 years $.03 to $.55 per mile 8 miles 99 years $.43 to $.86 per mile PR-22 54.5 miles 40 years $.17 to $.72 per mile Existing toll road New roadway Existing toll road Bankrupcy-2013 Existing toll road New roadway

Solutions the EDC Supports INCREASE the current STATE fuel tax A one cent gas tax increase in MO will generate $30M/year A one cent diesel fuel tax increase in MO will generate $9.8M/year INCREASE the current FEDERAL fuel tax Levee a SALES TAX dedicated to transportation Create a BONDING mechanism for transportation projects Assess a USER FEE based on miles driven Tax ALL MOTOR FUELS equallynatural gas, electric, hydrogen, propane, and others Dedicate a percent of STATE REVENUE GROWTH to transportation Increase VEHICLE REGISTRATION and LICENSE FEES

Our Plan for Moving Forward Build a Coalition against tolling Develop a grassroots network Educate residents and business owners on the impact of tolling Lobby policymakers to prevent tolling EDC Day at the Capitol Support fair, equitable and viable transportation funding solutions

What You Can Do to Help Unify around the issue Row in the same direction Educate yourself, family members, customers, and neighbors on the impact of tolling Join the grassroots movement Spread the word with your constituents WARREN COUNTY

Questions? The Greater Warren County EDC