3l\ SA\ J<-L\YA-~ ~Sl+A.R.iV A- ~..J AR\<.r'\ Vu ~' n6. R. A- K.D::&\:D. E:..\ G. H L-\P ~ t>i- 0-0) ~ \ "'-"\ C---L-..tA ~o l8' \. C-- C- (TYvu.v ).. i>'j_ '(."'';\-;-'''''' 2-\~ -; - tv ~\ b.tcl.'\~o\.""~.ec \ ')-")..:" :::>..~\ ij
-." " ': "; :' "' ti.
_..--~.~=~._._---_ ------ - -_.~_--- ---_ -----~.~ ;r i i Room no. - 33 3 m floor Baba Gang Nath Mars Munirka New Delhi - 0067 Website; ci-.:.buv.ill File no.: CCOM-R-208-00-SA-02 Dated: 06-.02-2.08!... f '\JSh. Basant Kumar Sharma Dwarika Puri Agra Road Etah (ll.p) - 207.0.0 Sub : nf!!!.!!'atlon under RT Act 200S Sir am to refer to your RT application dated 3~.ol-2D8 recleved in the registry of C:SA from RT Cell on 3.0-.0-2.08.The information in respect of your letter compllnt dated 8-.08-207 is as under;-......~.... No file has been created on your complaint letter dated 8-OS-2.o7. This letter has been added to the E-book of the case file no. CCBSA?-D6DDD2So. 2. No action was required to be taken on the said letter as the respondent has already complied with the Commissions decision datej.0-05-2.07 in the above said case file by submitting the required affidavit. 3 No such priority. 4. No such priority given in the RT Act. 2.0.05. S. Does not arise in view of nformation given in poi nt no. & 2 Details of First Appellate Authority in (..C is as under:- Sh. Rakesh Kumar Singh (Addl. Room no. 502 5 th Floor" Baba Gang Nath Marg Munlrka New Delhi -.0.067 Ph. :.0-2467.0982675295 Secy. 'um FAA) (Fax) E-mail: as~cic@nic.in...-l- (".K Mohapatra) Dy. Registrar & C.P.LO Copy to:. Nodal CPO w.r! CCOMR2D8DDlll dated 3.0-.0-2.08. 2. DR to Chief.e. for information.
(' " <:~NTRALNFORMATON COMMSSON c. '.' """.. _ 2nd Fioor 'B' Wing August Kranti Bhawan Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi -0066 Tel: +9--2686535 ii AppeaNo.CCBSA206000268 Appellant: ~asant Kumar Sharma Dwarika Puri Agra Road Etah-20700 Uttar Pradesh ' ": Respondent:.Central Public nformation Officer Asstt. Dir. Deptt. of Posts 00. The Postmaster General Agra Region Agra-28200 U.P. 2.Central Public nformation Officer Supdt. Deptt. of Posts i': 00. Supdt. of Post Offices Kity Road '! Etah Division Etah U.P. 3.Central Public nformation Officer Date of Hearing: Dated of Decision: Asstt. Supdt. of Posts (PG) " Oak Shawan Sansad Marg New Delhi 0.05.207 0.05.207 ': : :i ORDER Facts: ". The appellant filed RT application dated 2.06.205 seeking copy of report of PMG Agra on the basis of which D.O. letter No. 792-P.Comp dated 9.7.992 was issued by Shri A.K. Bhatnagar Director(PC) ; copy ofl~eports of Supdt. of Post Office Etah ASP and nvestigation nspector on Ute basis of which PMG Agra filed his report to the Deptt. of Posts New Delhi etdj!' 2. The epo responded on 24.06.205 and 3.07.205. The appellanti:filed first appeal dated 6.07.205 with First Appellate Authority (FAA). l:the FAA J " : :: i ~ i ' " U
0" ap~ellant (.'" responded on 27.08.205. The appellant filed second appeal on.0.20'6 before the Commission on the ground that information should be provided to him. Hearing: 3. The respondent No. 2 and appellant participated in the hearing through video conferencing. T~e respondent NO.3participated in the hearing perso'nally. 4. The appellant stated that he was falsely implicated in a case of: FERA violation so as to prevent and disqualify him from immigration abroad for a professionai job: The appellant stated that the matter was decided by i:i:6 Delhi " High Court in the' yeqr 203. The appellant said that he is seeking above documents to file his. case in the Supreme Court. The appellant stated that respondent has provided misleading information that record has been destroyed. 5. t"'""!l-e-re-s-p-o-n-a'~e-n-t:-;:n""0-.-:--""::"(lo--::2:-_-s.tjted that the information sought by the \ J (.. ".. ' was more th?-n 20 years old and the same was destroyed. Discussion! observation: 6. {Jne rese ldent~~sho]..ll5lprovide an affidavirtoffie aprelant-amj."-tothe {COffii~ion.stafing~tQat-thernave Clestroyeame sought for record pertainliig ~year Decision: r99~.::? cost. Auth~ated (S.C. Sharma) Dy. Registrar true copy -'. "' 2