Compliance Monitor Register of Projects

Similar documents
CONSTRUCTION MONITOR Transformation Q4 2017

Inform Practice Note #16

Inform Practice Note #17

Inform Practice Note #19

CONSTRUCTION MONITOR Supply & Demand Q1 2018

CONSTRUCTION MONITOR Transformation Q4 2014

CONSTRUCTION MONITOR Employment Q3 2017

Inform Practice Note #8

Residential Property Indices. Date Published: August 2018

Residential Property Indices. Date Published: September 2018

Residential Property Indices. Date Published: July 2018

Residential Property Indices. Date Published: October 2018

LABOUR MARKET PROVINCIAL 54.3 % 45.7 % Unemployed Discouraged work-seekers % 71.4 % QUARTERLY DATA SERIES

Residential Property Indices. Date Published: February 2018

MFMA. Audit outcomes of municipalities

Residential Property Indices. Date Published: 30 June 2014

SABOA 2013 NATIONAL CONFERENCE 28 FEBRUARY 2013 CSIR CONFERENCE CENTRE

SECTION 2: OVERVIEW OF AUDIT OUTCOMES. Consolidated general report on national and provincial audit outcomes for

Who cares about regional data?

LABOUR MARKET PROVINCIAL 51.6 % 48.4 % Unemployed Discouraged work-seekers % 71.8 % QUARTERLY DATA SERIES

URBAN RENEWAL TAX INCENTIVE

Performance of Municipalities in 2015

Residential Property Indices. Date Published: August 2016

Quarterly Labour Force Survey

Residential Property Indices. Date Published: March 2018

Invitation to participate in the Independent Development Trust (IDT) Contractor Development Programme (CDP) CIDB Grade 1 to 5 GB/PE

The status of performance management. Consolidated general report on the national and provincial audit outcomes

Overview of the state of CSI in South Africa

Integrating climate risk assessment/management/drr into national policies, programmes and sectoral planning. G Midgley, South Africa

Taking accountability to improve audit outcomes

ENTREPRENUERS FUNDED BY. Luyanda Nwenya, Owner of ICU Eyecare Specialist - a Zimele - funded business.

RESULTS OF THE 2010 SURVEY OF THE. cidb CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INDICATORS MAY Prepared by: Dr HJ Marx

cidb development through partnership August 2008 Update on the National Infrastructure Maintenance Strategy (NIMS)

Status of financial management

2014 Appropriation Bill

Provincial Review 2016: KwaZulu-Natal

THE NEF APPLICATION FORM R R75 million

STRIKING THE RIGHT BALANCE IN REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF DEVELOPMENT FINANCE INSTITUTIONS

Government Gazette Staatskoerant

PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES DPW STRATEGIC PLAN AND BUDGET FOR 2012/13 15 MAY 2012

The cidb Quarterly Monitor. T h e C o n s t r u c t i o n I n d u s t r y D e v e l o p m e n t B o a r d Development Through Partnership

RESULTS OF THE 2011 SURVEY OF THE. cidb CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INDICATORS MARCH Prepared by: Prof. HJ Marx

University of Pretoria Department of Economics Working Paper Series

fundnews GEPF invests responsibly Call Centre Second Edition

BPDM Cooperative Summit

Regional and Local Governments (RLGs) Moody s Approach

Presentation to the Select Committee on Appropriations COMMUNITY LIBRARY SERVICES GRANT. 25 May 2011

Fraud and consequence management

Inaugural Gauteng Infrastructure Investment Conference

Labour. Labour market dynamics in South Africa, statistics STATS SA STATISTICS SOUTH AFRICA

GOVERNMENT NOTICE GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWING

LINKING POPULATION DYNAMICS TO MUNICIPAL REVENUE ALLOCATION IN SOUTH AFRICAN CITIES

Housing backlog: Protests and the demand for Housing in South Africa BY ESTERI MSINDO PSAM

The National Credit Act and the National Credit Regulator

SUPPLIER REGISTRATION & ACCREDITATION FORM. Registered name: Trading as name of business: Products &/ services offered:

JUTA'S WEEKLY STATUTES BULLETIN

Urban Settlements Development Grant

Performance reports. General report on the national and provincial audit outcomes for

The Competition starts at 00:00 on Thursday, 17 January 2019 and ends at 23:59 on Sunday, 31 March 2019 (Competition Period).

ANNUAL REPORT 2013/2014 WORKING FOR INTEGRATION

A SIMPLE SOLUTION TO JOB CREATION

sefa Finance Solutions

Salary Survey. The Association of South African Quantity Surveyors (ASAQS) March 2017 (Published in October 2017) South African Construction Industry

SHAREHOLDING STRUCTURE. Public

JUTA'S WEEKLY STATUTES BULLETIN

OVERVIEW OF TRANSNET CAPITAL INVESTMENTS IN KZN & EMPOWERMENT OPPORTUNITIES EDTEA s Budget Speech Engagement Session in Richards Bay 16 May 2018

Considerations in City Economic Development Strategy

Why Cape Peninsula house prices are losing out

A STUDY OF THE LABOUR MARKET IN SOUTH AFRICA ABSTRACT

ECONOMIC GROWTH PROVINCIAL INTRODUCTION QUARTERLY DATA SERIES

Municipal Infrastructure Grant Baseline Study

MUNICIPAL KEY HIGHLIGHTS DATA ANALYSIS

MUNENE RISK SERVICES. Company

Biannual Economic and Capacity Survey. July December2017

INFRASTRUCTURE DIALOGUE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION INDUSTRY INFRASTRUCTURE PERSPECTIVE

Extended PEC Lekgotla

EPIC. Economic Performance Indicators for Cape Town. 2017: Quarter 3 (July - September)

Portfolio Committee on Energy

A comprehensive view of the state of the residential rental market in South Africa Q JAN - MAR

Department of Home Affairs: Learnership Programme

1. Introduction 2. DOMESTIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS. 2.1 Economic performance in South Africa ISBN: SECOND QUARTER 2013

Quarterly Labour Force Survey Q1:2018

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Focus on Household and Economic Statistics. Insights from Stats SA publications. Nthambeleni Mukwevho Stats SA

fundnews PEO s YEAR-END MESSAGE Call Centre Third Edition

Fourth ASISA Insurance Gap Study (performed by True South Actuaries & Consultants)

Presentation to Portfolio Committee on CoGTA on debts owed to Eskom and Water Boards

South African CitiesNetwork

PROGRESS WITH THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

Portfolio Committee on Safety and Security

Terms of Reference Development of the City of Tshwane Sustainability Financing Mechanism Strategy

Dr Willem J. De Beer, Chief Operations Officer, EDI Holdings (Pty) Ltd, South Africa 23November 2010

An analysis of training expenditure in the Public Service sector

PART /18 // Submission for the Division of Revenue CHAPTER 5. Enhancing the Role of Public Entities in Rural Development

Minister Jeff Radebe: Independent Power Producer Programmes. Senior officials from all stakeholders behind this outcome

HOSPITALITY SECTOR MINIMUM WAGES AS FROM 1 JULY 2017 TABLE 1:

Statistical release P0141

REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE ON THE PROVINCIAL TREASURIES EXPENDITURE REVIEW FOR THE 2014/15 FINANCIAL YEAR, DATED 14 OCTOBER 2015

Water Regulation and Pricing RSA EXPERIENCE

Statistical release P0141

Transcription:

Compliance Monitor Register of Projects Quarter 2017

CIDB REGISTER OF PROJECTS COMPLIANCE MONITOR; JULY 2017 1. Introduction 1 2. Background and Analysis for Compliance Indicators 3 2.1 Tender Awards 3 2.2 Contract Completion 3 3. Tender Awards 4 4. Contract Completion 9 4.1 Non-Term Contracts 9 4.2 Term contracts 12

CIDB REGISTER OF PROJECTS COMPLIANCE MONITOR; JULY 2017 The cidb Register of Projects Compliance Monitor provides indicators of the level of compliance and non-compliance with the Register of Projects by client bodies. These indicators can be used by clients to verify their non-compliance with the cidb regulations, and for the cidb to support enforcement actions and sanctions. This Compliance Monitor is being rolled-out incrementally, and currently focuses on: selected national and provincial infrastructure departments; public entities; and Metropolitan Councils. The Compliance Monitor has recently been restructured, and now only focuses on tender awards and contract closure. 1. Introduction Information on tender awards and project closure is of paramount importance to the cidb, and provides the basis, amongst others, for: gathering reliable information on public sector construction expenditure, at a municipal and provincial level and at various tender Grades; assessing supply and demand in the construction industry; promoting and increasing transparency and accountability in construction procurement; monitoring and assessing the level of expenditure (through main contracts) on black-, women- and youth-owned construction enterprises; and monitoring compliance with and the impact of cidb Best Practices. The Construction Industry Development Regulations of 2004, as amended, were developed in terms of the CIDB Act 38 of 2000 to support the above objectives. In terms of these Regulations, employers in the public sector must comply with requirements for project registration, award and closure as follows: a) for the public sector, on projects of which the value exceeds R200 000.00; or b) for a public entity listed in Schedule 2 of the Public Finance Management Act, on projects of which the value exceeds R10 million. Specifically, in terms of the CID Regulations, employers (or clients) must currently comply with the following: a) registration of employers and employer s representatives on the cidb Register of Projects in terms of Clause 20; b) advertisement of tender invitations cidb Register of Projects in terms of Clause 38(6) (transitional measure); c) registration of the tender award in terms of Clause 18; and d) contract completion or cancellation in terms of Clause 21, once the transitional measures have been removed. In the case of the public sector organisations and public entities, non-compliance with the CID Regulations must in terms of Clause 21(4) be reported to the Auditor General, and can also result in fines being applied. It is the cidb s aim and objective that this Compliance Monitor will contribute to improving compliance with the CID Regulations with regard to the registration of tender awards and contract completion 1

and thereby contributing to a better understanding of public sector infrastructure spend and the development of the construction industry. The cidb Register of Projects is also closely aligned to the National Treasury Central Supplier Database. As of 1 April 2016, National Treasury has introduced the Central Supplier Database (CSD) as a single consolidated comprehensive database for national, provincial or local government in order to remove duplication and fragmentation of supplier information across spheres of government. This database applies to all services including construction. The National Treasury etender Publication Portal also forms part of this consolidation, and gives free access to public sector tender opportunities in South Africa. It was established to deal with corruption and to bring transparency to supply chain management. It requires all public sector clients to publish their tenders notices and tender awards on a single platform. Due to the introduction of these regulations by National Treasury, cidb will therefore no longer be reporting on the advertisement of tender notices on the cidb itender/ Register of Projects within the Compliance Monitor. 2

2. Background and Analysis for Compliance Indicators The background and key assumptions used in developing and in interpreting the compliance indicators used in the Compliance Monitor are highlighted below. 2.1 Tender Awards Indicators of compliance with the CID Regulation requirements for notification of tender awards are obtained in terms of the total number of tender notices recorded on the cidb Register of Projects and which have been recorded as having been awarded. To allow for the time lag between advertisement of tenders notices and award, tender notices issued within 90 days of the date of issue of this Compliance Monitor are excluded. Furthermore, tender notices which are cancelled or withdrawn are excluded. A four quarter rolling total is used. Note that the compliance indicator does not take into account any lack of compliance with the CID Regulations requirements for recording tender notices on the cidb Register of Projects or the National Treasury etender Portal. Additional indicators of compliance with the CID Regulation requirements for notification of tender awards will be included shortly, including a comparison between tender awards recorded on the cidb Register of Projects and the National Treasury etender Portal. 2.2 Contract Completion Although not a mandatory requirement yet in terms of the CID Regulation until the removal of the transitional measures, indicators of tenders awarded but not yet completed are included. To allow for the time lag between award or registration of projects and contract completion, tender awards or projects registered within 90 days for non-term contracts and 180 days for term contracts of the date of issue of this Compliance Monitor are excluded. Furthermore, tender awards which are cancelled are excluded. A four quarter rolling total is used. The indicators of contract completion are given separately for non-term contracts and term contracts. Non-term contracts are contracts which have a duration of shorter than a year and term contracts are contracts which are longer than a period of one year. 3

3. Tender Awards Indicators of non-compliance with the requirements for the award of tenders are given on the following pages, in which the number of tender notices recorded on the cidb Register of Projects which have not been recorded as being awarded for the period 2015Q2 to 2016Q3 are given. Note that entities with low numbers of tender notices recorded on the cidb Register of Projects are not reported on which could itself be an indicator of non-compliance. Furthermore, compliance rations for a particular quarter denoted as - indicates where no tender notices are recorded for the four quarters under review which again could itself be an indicator of non-compliance. Overall, it is seen that compliance ratios with the requirements for the award of tenders varies typically between 50% to 65%, with the highest ratio of compliance being for municipal entities, national departments, provincial departments and local municipalities. Low levels of compliance for the period 2015Q2 2016Q3 are seen for: Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) Eskom Holdings Limited Magalies Water Roads Agency Limpopo Department of Higher Education ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality Department of Education; Free State Agricultural Research Council City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality Johannesburg Social Housing Company Department of Health; KwaZulu-Natal Department of Police, Roads and Transport; Free State Department of Roads and Transport; Limpopo Relatively high levels of compliance for the period 2015Q2 2016Q3 are seen for: South African Police Services Department of Education; North West Department of Education; Northern Cape Department of Public Works; Limpopo Mandela Bay Development Agency Department of Health; Western Cape Department of Education; Western Cape South African National Roads Agency Limited Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality Department of Sports, Arts and Culture; KwaZulu-Natal Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs; KwaZulu-Natal Joburg Market City of Cape Town Metropolitan Department of Transport, Roads and Public Works; Northern Cape Department of Public Works, Roads and Transport; Mpumalanga Details of individual tenders notices not awarded are available from the cidb on request. 4

Number of Tender Notices not Awarded per 4 rolling Quarters Entity Type 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 District Municipalities 138 133 140 123 123 115 Local Municipalities 428 479 526 542 605 655 Metropolitan Municipalities 246 225 181 213 227 258 Municipal Entities 62 52 45 34 30 35 National Departments 147 111 152 182 199 213 Provincial Departments 430 504 587 670 738 603 State Owned Enterprises 442 415 434 387 387 318 Number of Tender Notices Awarded per Quarter per 4 rolling Quarters Entity Type 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 District Municipalities 125 119 134 117 116 130 Local Municipalities 775 817 801 794 771 690 Metropolitan Municipalities 316 306 284 218 203 163 Municipal Entities 117 101 102 91 78 60 National Departments 398 342 337 326 312 292 Provincial Departments 796 721 883 1109 1144 886 State Owned Enterprises 435 469 473 509 508 410 Tender Awards Compliance Indicator (%) per 4 rolling Quarters Entity Type 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 District Municipalities 48% 47% 49% 49% 49% 53% Local Municipalities 64% 63% 60% 59% 56% 51% Metropolitan Municipalities 56% 58% 61% 51% 47% 39% Municipal Entities 65% 66% 69% 73% 72% 63% National Departments 73% 75% 69% 64% 61% 58% Provincial Departments 65% 59% 60% 62% 61% 60% State Owned Enterprises 50% 53% 52% 57% 57% 56% 5

Tender Awards Compliance Indicator (%) per 4 rolling Quarters Metropolitan Municipalities 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality 74% 47% 45% 75% 76% 66% City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality 96% 96% 95% 91% 90% 87% City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality 90% 86% 73% 58% 43% 0% City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality 11% 27% 15% 10% 11% 0% Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality 82% 74% 59% 50% 13% 7% ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality 100% 100% 95% 92% 86% 75% Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality 0% - 11% 10% 8% 6% Tender Awards Compliance Indicator (%) per 4 rolling Quarters Municipal Entities 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 City Power Johanneburg 89% 0% - 0% 0% 0% Joburg Market 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% Johannesburg City Parks 45% 42% 45% 60% 71% 53% Johannesburg Development Agency 64% 68% 75% 83% 79% 71% Johannesburg Roads Agency 87% 90% 96% 95% 69% 69% Johannesburg Social Housing Company 0% 14% 22% 25% 29% 17% Johannesburg Water 59% 85% 79% 71% 75% 64% Mandela Bay Development Agency 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Pikitup Johannesburg (SOC) Ltd 75% 75% 50% - - - Tender Awards Compliance Indicator (%) per 4 rolling Quarters National Departments 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Department of Higher Education - - - - 0% 0% Department of Rural Development and Land Reform 67% 66% 56% 50% 46% 44% Department of Water and Sanitation 67% 67% 75% 77% 83% 50% National Department of Public Works 71% 74% 71% 68% 66% 65% South African Police Services 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 6

Tender Awards Compliance Indicator (%) per 4 rolling Quarters Provincial Departments 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Department of Agriculture and Land Administration; Northern Cape 57% 46% 46% 46% 64% 91% Department of Agriculture; Limpopo 80% 71% 45% 33% 33% 17% Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs; Mpumalanga 77% 24% 4% 7% 8% 83% Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs; KwaZulu-Natal - - 100% 100% 50% 95% Department of Education; Free State 6% 0% 2% 2% 2% 0% Department of Education; North West 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Department of Education; Northern Cape - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Department of Education; Western Cape 93% 100% - - - - Department of Health; Free State 80% 100% 86% 83% 83% 8% Department of Health; KwaZulu-Natal 67% 50% 33% 29% 11% 0% Department of Health; North West 28% 39% 71% 54% 55% 47% Department of Health; Western Cape 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 96% Department of Infrastructure Development; Gauteng 36% 50% 60% 56% 51% 42% Department of Police, Roads and Transport; Free State 0% 0% 0% 0% 38% 60% Department of Public Works and Infrastructure; Free State 73% 57% 50% 49% 50% 45% Department of Public Works; North West 41% 29% 22% 0% 0% 22% Department of Public Works; KwaZulu-Natal 80% 56% 56% 68% 62% 65% Department of Public Works, Roads and Transport; Mpumalanga 88% 87% 79% 86% 85% 88% Department of Roads and Public Works; Eastern Cape 74% 74% 79% 74% 66% 47% Department of Roads and Transport; Limpopo 17% - - - - - Department of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform; Eastern Cape 100% 100% 100% 100% 55% 42% Department of Sports, Arts and Culture; KwaZulu-Natal 100% 100% 100% 100% 84% 79% Department of Transport and Public Works; Western Cape 86% 84% 84% 83% 93% 83% Department of Transport, Roads and Public Works; Northern Cape 100% 95% 95% 96% 84% 79% Department of Transport; KwaZulu-Natal 27% 26% 28% 34% 44% 49% Department of Public Works; Limpopo 100% 100% - - - - 7

Tender Awards Compliance Indicator (%) per 4 rolling Quarters State Owned Enterprises 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Agricultural Research Council 9% 4% 5% 0% 10% 7% Airports Company South Africa Limited (ACSA) 13% 24% 27% 54% 52% 43% Amatola Water Board 88% 100% 87% 86% 86% 80% Bloem Water 25% 50% 33% 38% 50% 40% Coega Development Corporation (Coega) 100% 29% 23% 31% 32% 96% Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) - - - - 0% 0% Eskom Holdings Limited 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Independent Development Trust (IDT) 25% 55% 53% 57% 48% 46% Lepelle Northern Water 49% 43% 39% 47% 68% 89% Magalies Water 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Mhlathuze Water 44% 58% 25% 25% 27% 0% Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) 52% 47% 49% 62% 52% 35% Rand Water 64% 59% 56% 50% 38% 36% Roads Agency Limpopo 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% South African National Parks 52% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% South African National Roads Agency Limited 95% 97% 98% 99% 99% 96% South African Revenue Services 75% 100% 33% 50% 50% 36% Transnet Capital Projects 65% 57% 52% 59% 53% 60% Transnet Rail Engineering 76% 64% 62% 55% 50% 38% Transnet Freight Rail 72% 80% 76% 80% 83% 50% Transnet National Ports Authority 50% 33% 58% 54% 55% 88% Transnet Pipelines 100% 100% 100% 100% 55% 13% Transnet Property 92% 100% 100% 100% 63% 50% Umgeni Water 83% 63% 33% 47% 52% 58% 8

4. Contract Completion Indicators of tenders awarded but not yet completed are given on the following pages, in which the number of tender awards not recorded on the cidb Register of Projects which have not been recorded as being completed for the period 2015Q2 to 2016Q3 are given for non-term contracts and 2015Q1 to 2015Q4 for term contracts. Note that entities with low numbers of tender awards recorded on the cidb Register of Projects are not reported on which could itself be an indicator of non-compliance. Furthermore, compliance rations for a particular quarter denoted as - indicates where no tender awards are recorded for the four quarters under review which again could itself be an indicator of non-compliance. 4.1 Non-Term Contracts Low levels of compliance for the period 2015Q2 to 2016Q3 are seen for: Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality Ekurhuleni Municipality Metropolitan Johannesburg Development Agency Department of Rural Development and Land Reform National Department of Health Department of Education; Western Cape Coega Development Corporation (Coega) Rand Water South African National Roads Agency Limited Department of Infrastructure Development; Gauteng Department of Public Works; Limpopo Department of Public Works, Roads and Transport; Mpumalanga Department of Roads and Public Works; Eastern Cape Department of Transport and Public Works; Western Cape Department of Transport; KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture and Land Administration; Northern Cape National Department of Public Works Department of Public Works; KwaZulu-Natal Relatively high levels of compliance for the period 2015Q2 to 2016Q3 are seen for: City of Cape Town Metropolitan ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality 9

Number of Tender Awards not closed per 4 rolling Quarters Entity Type 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 District Municipalities 42 50 31 40 38 31 Local Municipalities 169 158 161 136 112 96 Metropolitan Municipalities 106 76 69 53 58 54 Municipal Entities 3 4 3 4 5 5 National Departments 14 14 17 17 16 20 Provincial Departments 540 522 565 477 383 393 State Owned Enterprises 13 16 13 9 8 8 Number of Tender Awards not closed per 4 rolling Quarters Entity Type 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 District Municipalities 2 5 4 3 3 0 Local Municipalities 25 24 22 16 12 10 Metropolitan Municipalities 101 90 85 63 60 48 Municipal Entities 0 0 0 0 0 0 National Departments 1 3 3 4 4 2 Provincial Departments 147 47 36 19 16 11 State Owned Enterprises 4 3 0 0 0 0 Entity Type 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 District Municipalities 5% 9% 11% 7% 7% 0% Local Municipalities 13% 13% 12% 11% 10% 9% Metropolitan Municipalities 49% 54% 55% 54% 51% 47% Municipal Entities 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% National Departments 7% 18% 15% 19% 20% 9% Provincial Departments 21% 8% 6% 4% 4% 3% State Owned Enterprises 24% 16% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10

Metropolitan Municipalities 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality 0% 0% - - - - City of Cape Town Metropolitan 50% 50% 50% 33% 50% 50% Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality 0% 0% 0% 0% - - ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality 55% 56% 56% 56% 51% 47% Municipal Entities 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Johannesburg Development Agency 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% National Departments 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Department of Rural Development and Land Reform 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% National Department of Health - - 0% 0% 0% 0% National Department of Public Works 10% 30% 33% 40% 44% 22% Provincial Departments 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Department of Agriculture and Land Administration; Northern Cape - - 33% 33% 20% 17% Department of Education; Western Cape 0% 0% 0% - - - Department of Infrastructure Development; Gauteng 4% 4% 5% 9% 4% 3% Department of Police, Roads and Transport; Free State 67% 13% 10% 5% 6% 4% Department of Public Works; KwaZulu-Natal 14% 23% 42% 73% 67% 37% Department of Public Works, Roads and Transport; Mpumalanga 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Department of Roads and Public Works; Eastern Cape 2% 7% 4% 4% 7% 0% Department of Transport and Public Works; Western Cape 13% 9% 4% 0% 0% 0% Department of Transport; KwaZulu-Natal 25% 67% 67% 40% 0% 0% Department of Public Works; Limpopo 3% 6% 6% 3% 17% 0% State Owned Enterprises 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 Coega Development Corporation (Coega) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - Rand Water 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% South African National Roads Agency Limited 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% Transnet Freight Rail 36% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11

4.2 Term Contracts Low levels of compliance for the period 2015Q1 to 2015Q4 are seen for: Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality Johannesburg Development Agency Johannesburg Roads Agency Department of Education; Western Cape Department of Police, Roads and Transport; Free State Department of Public Works and Infrastructure; Free State Department of Public Works; Limpopo Coega Development Corporation (Coega) Department of Transport and Public Works; Western Cape National Department of Public Works Department of Transport; KwaZulu-Natal City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality 12

Number of Tender Awards not closed per 4 rolling Quarters Entity Type 2015Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 District Municipalities 8 4 2 2 Local Municipalities 149 150 137 119 Metropolitan Municipalities 95 116 120 123 Municipal Entities 35 26 28 19 National Departments 2 1 8 9 Provincial Departments 267 245 246 185 State Owned Enterprises 15 13 6 6 Number of Tender Awards closed per 4 rolling Quarters Entity Type 2015Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 District Municipalities 2 0 0 0 Local Municipalities 18 20 18 15 Metropolitan Municipalities 3 0 0 0 Municipal Entities 0 0 0 0 National Departments 1 1 0 0 Provincial Departments 74 69 31 12 State Owned Enterprises 0 0 0 0 Entity Type 2015Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 District Municipalities 20% 0% 0% 0% Local Municipalities 11% 12% 12% 11% Metropolitan Municipalities 3% 0% 0% 0% Municipal Entities 0% 0% 0% 0% National Departments 33% 50% 0% 0% Provincial Departments 22% 22% 11% 6% State Owned Enterprises 0% 0% 0% 0% 13

Metropolitan Municipalities 2015Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality 0% 0% 0% 0% City of Cape Town Metropolitan 23% 0% 0% 0% Ekurhuleni Municipality Metropolitan 0% 0% 0% 0% Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality 0% 0% 0% 0% Municipal Entities 2015Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 Johannesburg Development Agency 0% 0% 0% 0% Johannesburg Roads Agency 0% 0% - - National Departments 2015Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 National Department of Public Works 33% 50% 0% 0% Provincial Departments 2015Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 Department of Education; Western Cape 0% 0% 0% 0% Department of Police, Roads and Transport; Free State 0% 0% 0% - Department of Public Works and Infrastructure; Free State 0% 0% 0% 0% Department of Transport and Public Works; Western Cape 0% 8% 5% 5% Department of Transport; KwaZulu-Natal 25% 26% 14% 7% Department of Public Works; Limpopo - 0% 0% 0% State Owned Enterprises 2015Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015Q4 Coega Development Corporation (Coega) 0% 0% 0% 0% 14

Gauteng Provincial Office Pretoria cidbgp@cidb.org.za Western Cape Provincial Office Cape Town cidbwc@cidb.org.za Eastern Cape Provincial Office Bisho cidbec@cidb.org.za Northern Cape Provincial Office Kimberley cidbnc@cidb.org.za Free State Provincial Office Bloemfontein cidbfs@cidb.org.za KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Office Durban cidbkzn@cidb.org.za Limpopo Provincial Office Polokwane cidblimpopo@cidb.org.za Mpumalanga Provincial Office Nelspruit (Mbombela) cidbmpumalanga@cidb.org.za North West Provincial Office Mahikeng cidbnw@cidb.org.za cidb contact number: 086 100 2432 Anonymous Fraud Line: 0800 11 24 32 email: cidb@cidb.org.za www.cidb.org.za