Liquids-Rich Montney Natural Gas Resource Play in Alberta s Deep Basin Q4 2012
Forward-Looking Statements Certain information and statements contained in this presentation contain forward-looking information or statements ( forward looking statements ) within the meaning of applicable securities laws. In particular and without limiting the foregoing, there are statements regarding Donnybrook Energy Inc. s (the Corporation ) timing of expected production, the timing of testing and completion results, exploration, development, drilling plans, number of drilling locations, initial production estimates and reserves and contingent resources estimates. All forward-looking statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature constitute forward-looking statements, and the words may, will, should, could, expect, plan, intend, anticipate, believe, estimate, propose, predict, potential, continue, or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or event to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, references to oil and natural gas production levels; capital expenditure programs; the quantity and composition of oil and natural gas reserves; projections or commodity prices and costs; supply and demand for oil and natural gas; expectations regarding the Corporation s ability to raise capital and to continually add reserves through acquisition, exploration and development and treatment under governmental regulatory regimes and tax laws. Although the Corporation believes that the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are reasonable, our forward-looking statements have been based on factors and assumptions concerning future events which may prove to be inaccurate and the Corporation s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. These factors are based on currently available information and include, but are not limited to: volatility in the market prices for oil and natural gas; liabilities inherent in oil and natural gas operations; uncertainties associated with estimating oil and natural gas reserves; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions; geological, technical, drilling and processing problems; fluctuations in foreign exchange or interest rates; health, safety and environmental risks; stock market volatility; global economic events or conditions; and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Corporation. The Corporation has made assumptions regarding: the impact of increasing competition; the general stability of the economic and political environment in which the Corporation operates; the timely receipt of any required regulatory approvals; the ability of the Corporation to obtain qualified staff, equipment and services in a timely and cost efficient manner; drilling results; the ability of the operator of the projects in which the Corporation has an interest to operate the field in a safe, efficient and effective manner; the ability of the Corporation to obtain financing on acceptable terms; field production rates and decline rates; the ability to replace and expand oil and natural gas reserves through acquisition, development of exploration; the timing and costs of pipeline, storage and facility construction and expansion and the ability of the Corporation to secure adequate product transportation; future oil and natural gas prices; currency exchange and interest rates; the regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes and environmental matters in the jurisdictions in which the Corporation operates; and the ability of the Corporation to successfully market its oil and natural gas products. As such, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as no assurance can be provided as to future results, levels of activity or achievements. This risks, uncertainties, material assumptions and other factors that could affect actual results are discussed in our Annual Information Form and other documents available under the Corporation s profile at www.sedar.com. Past performance of the Corporation or any other entities referred to in this presentation is shown for illustrative purposes only, does not guarantee future results of the Corporation and is not meant to forecast, imply or guarantee the future performance of the Corporation, which will vary. The reader is cautioned that well test results are not necessarily indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors affecting forward-looking statements is not exhaustive. Furthermore, the forward-looking information and statements are made as of the date of this presentation, and the Corporation does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking information or statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, expect as required by applicable law. The forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Boe s may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet per barrel (6mcf/bbl) of natural gas to barrels of oil equivalence is based upon an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency for the individual products at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different than the energy equivalency of the oil conversion ratio, utilizing the oil conversion ratio may be misleading as an indication of value. 1
Information Regarding Disclosure on Contingent Resources Contingent resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but may not currently be considered commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. Contingent resources are in addition to reserves booked as proved, probable and possible. The contingencies that prevent the economic contingent resources from being classified as reserves are due to the early stage of the development. Additional drilling, completion, test and production history results are required before these contingent resources are converted to reserves and for a development plan to be committed to. A development plan for a project such as this will likely be developed sequentially over a number of drilling seasons and is subject to annual budget constraints, orderly development on a staged basis, the timing of the growth of third party infrastructure, the short and long-term view on gas prices, the results of exploration and development activities in the area and possible infrastructure capacity constraints. Uncertainty ranges are described by the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook as low, best and high estimates for resources as follows: Low Estimate: This is considered to be a conservative estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the low estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90 percent probability (P90) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the low estimate. Best Estimate: This is considered to be the best estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50 percent probability (P50) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate. High Estimate: This is considered to be an optimistic estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the high estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10 percent probability (P10) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the high estimate. 2
Corporate Highlights Focused, high-quality Montney land position 46 gross (22.4 net) sections in the liquids-rich Montney gas fairway in Alberta s Deep Basin, one of the most geologically favourable Montney positions in the WCSB De-risked land base Donnybrook and industry drilling have de-risked over 2/3 of Donnybrook s land base in the Simonette / Resthaven and Bigstone areas Near-term, organic cash flow potential Extensive infrastructure in immediate area positions Donnybrook s assets well for near-term growth in production and cash flow through the drill bit Growing production base Current production (1) of ~317 boe/d from 5 gross (2 net) wells with additional production from 2 gross (0.95 net) wells expected by Q1 2013 Sizeable booked resource An independent study across a portion of Donnybrook s 14,295 net Montney acres assigned Total Proved plus Probable and Best Estimate Contingent Resource of~62 Bcf sales gas and ~2,050 Mbbl of condensate and NGLs (2) Significant growth potential Greater than 80 net potential Montney horizontal drilling locations Zero debt (1) Q3 2012 average production, includes equivalent production for GORRs (2) GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. ( GLJ ) Reserves and Resource Assessment effective April 30, 2012 3
Regional Overview Top-Tier North American Resource Play Montney supply cost is among the lowest in North America Focused Montney Position: Simonette / Resthaven: 18.9 net sections (12,055 net acres) Bigstone: 3.5 net sections (2,240 net acres) Large In-Place Resource : 20+ Bcf gas/section + 1,200 Mbbl NGLs/section Source: Alberta Geological Survey, Donnybrook Energy 4
Montney Overview Unconventional Montney Regional Overview Commentary Donnybrook s Montney properties at Simonette / Resthaven and Bigstone are located in Deep Basin region of West Central Alberta, an area of increasing industry activity The primary target in both regions is the Upper Montney, which is a silica-rich silty sandstone Simonette Resthaven Located in the Montney over-pressured window with pressure gradient ranging from 10-12 kpa/m High silica and dolomite content, which allows for improved fracture stimulations Bigstone Excellent porosity, which yields drilling rate of penetration (ROP) of up to 20 metres per hour High ROP allows for extended reach horizontal wells across two sections to be drilled economically Source: Canadian Discovery, Alberta Geological Survey, Donnybrook Energy 5
Montney Liquids Rock (13-07-071-09W6) 7.7 MMcf/d + 385 bbl/d Celtic (15-33) 15.8 MMcf/d + 1,008 bbl/d Tourmaline (10-34) 6.1 MMcf/d + condensate 7G (09-12) 4.0 MMcf/d + 1,975 bbl/d Tourmaline (06-31) 6.7 MMcf/d + condensate 7G (10-25) 1.6 MMcf/d + 670 bbl/d Daylight (11-31) 7.0 MMcf/d + 350 bbl/d Donnybrook (11-27) 3.5 MMcf/d + condensate (2) Daylight (07-29) 9.1 MMcf/d + 450 bbl/d Cequence (08-22) [DEI non-op] 1.5 MMcf/d + 250 bbl/d oil NuVista (09-22) 10.0 MMcf/d + 650 bbl/d Delphi (09-04) 0.9 MMcf/d + 153 bbl/d Paramount (Karr-Gold Crk) 13.4 MMcf/d + 670 bbl/d (1) Delphi (14-23) 16.0 MMcf/d + 800 bbl/d NuVista (02-01) 10.0 MMcf/d + 500 bbl/d Donnycreek (14-30) 5.0 MMcf/d + 974 bbl/d Simonette Resthaven Bigstone Donnybrook (13-33) 2.9 MMcf/d + 510 bbl/d (3) Donnybrook (15-32) 1.1 MMcf/d + 50 bbl/d (4) 7G (12-18) 23.9 MMcf/d + 3,372 bbl/d Delphi (16-30) 12.5 MMcf/d + 770 bbl/d Donnycreek (13-17) 8.3 MMcf/d + 1,150 bbl/d Donnybrook (14-29) 4.3 MMcf/d + 295 bbl/d 7G (03-24) 28.4 MMcf/d + 1,816 bbl/d Celtic (04-32) 3.5 MMcf/d + 263 bbl/d 7G (08-29) 4.7 MMcf/d + 1,209 bbl/d Celtic (04-05) 13.1 MMcf/d + 650 bbl/d Celtic (03-28) 2.5 MMcf/d + 1,596 bbl/d Delphi (04-02) 10.3 MMcf/d + 515 bbl/d Paramount (09-14) 12.0 MMcf/d + condensate Cequence (02-22) [DEI non-op] 6.4 MMcf/d + 100 bbl/d Paramount (01-35) 10.3 MMcf/d + 927 bbl/d Cequence (01-11) [DEI non-op] 8.9 MMcf/d + 40 bbl/d Donnybrook is located in one of the most liquids-rich regions of the Montney fairway Source: Accumap, company public disclosure of gas and free liquids test rates (1) One of several wells reported on Aug. 4, 2010 in Karr-Gold Creek; IPs range from 1.5 13.4 MMcf/d + 75 670 bbl/d (all at 50 bbl/mmcf free liquids) (2) ~55 bbl/mmcf free condensate expected based on intermittent in-line production testing 6 (3) 510 bbl/d condensate and load fluid (4) ~50 bbl/d NGLs
Simonette / Resthaven Overview Key Attributes 12,055 net concentrated acres (average WI of ~50%) Current net production (1) of ~210 boe/d Approximately 160 boe/d initial production expected from Resthaven 11-27 in Q1 2013 (2) Total Proved plus Probable Reserves of 4,714 Mboe (16% liquids) and Best Estimate Contingent Resource of 3,971 Mboe (16% liquids) (3) Opportunity to drill greater than 150 gross (~75 net) horizontal locations at four wells per section Attractive royalty incentives Wells qualify for both Alberta New Well Royalty Rate and Natural Gas Deep Drilling Program Ideally situated in close proximity to existing infrastructure, with increased liquids pricing at Simonette through Aux Sable agreement (1) Q3 2012 average production (2) Initial production rate forecast based on intermittent in-line testing (3) GLJ Reserves and Resource Assessment effective April 30, 2012 7
Simonette / Resthaven Operations and Future Plans Q1 2011 Simonette Hz 02-22 (25% WI) tested and put on-stream Additional 7.5% GORR BPO / 50% APO Tested at gross rates of 6.4 MMcf/d + 100 bbl/d free condensate (1) Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Resthaven Hz 11-27 (70% WI) tied-in Simonette Hz 08-22 (50% WI) tested and put on-stream Tested at gross rates of 250 bbl/d 43 API oil + 1.5 MMcf/d gas Feb 2012 Resthaven Hz 11-27 (70% WI) put on-stream Tested in-line intermittently at gross rates of 1 MMcf/d gas and 60 bbl/d free condensate (2) Simonette Hz 01-11 (50% WI) tested Drilled to a total MD of 5,027 m, completed with a 16-stage frac over a lateral length of 1,829 m Tested at gross rates of 8.9 MMcf/d gas and 40 bbl/d free condensate and load fluid (3) Mar 2012 Simonette Hz 01-11 (50% WI) tied-in and put on production H1 2013 Fourth Simonette Montney horizontal well (50% WI) anticipated to spud (1) Average rate after three days of cleanup (2) High line pressure of gathering system is affecting well s ability to flow consistently (3) Average flow rate at end of seven day test 8
Bigstone Overview Key Attributes 2,080 net concentrated acres Operated, 50% WI in six gross sections Two pooled sections with 25% WI (operated drilling) Current net production (1) of ~106 boe/d Bigstone 13-33 expected to be on-stream in Q4 2012 Total Proved plus Probable Reserves of 1,217 Mboe (18% liquids) and Best Estimate Contingent Resource of 2,442 Mboe (17% liquids) (2) Opportunity to drill 13 gross (5.75 net) extended reach horizontal wells across two sections Reduces well density by 50%, increases cost efficiency, and reduces surface environmental footprint Attractive royalty incentives Wells qualify for both Alberta New Well Royalty Rate and Natural Gas Deep Drilling Program Extensive infrastructure surrounding land, including Donnybrook operated surface facilities at 03-29 and 04-28 (1) Q3 2012 average production (2) GLJ Reserves and Resource Assessment effective April 30, 2012 9
Bigstone Operations and Future Plans Jun 2012 Bigstone Hz 14-29 (25% WI) put on-stream Additional 10% GORR on 75% BPO / 50% APO Tested at gross rates of 4.3 MMcf/d gas + 295 bbl/d free condensate Average gross initial production of 1.6 MMcf/d gas + 73 bbl/d free condensate (1) Jul 2012 Bigstone Hz 15-32 (50% WI) put on-stream Tested at gross rate of 1.1 MMcf/d gas + approximately 50 bbl/d NGLs Initial production 1.8 MMcf/d gas + 153 bbl/d free condensate (2) Only 6 / 23 fracs completed successfully well completion does not reflect quality of reservoir encountered Sep 2012 Bigstone Hz 13-33 (25% WI) tested Drilled to a total MD of 5,335 m, completed with a 23-stage frac over a lateral length of ~2,600 m Tested at gross rates of 2.9 MMcf/d gas and 510 bbl/d free condensate and load fluid (3) Expected to be tied-in into the DEI operated Bigstone pipeline system and on-stream in Q4 2012 H1 2013 Fourth Bigstone Montney Donnybrook operated extended reach horizontal well (50% WI) anticipated to spud (1) Average rate over first 42 days of operation; additional 30-35 bbl/mmcf NGLs expected to be extracted at plant (2) Average rate over first seven producing days 10 (3) Average flow rate during final 24 hours of a 32 hour and 15 minute test; 75% load fluid recovered to September 5, 2012
Montney Reserves and Resource 2P Reserves by Category Total 2P Reserves = 5,931 Mboe Prob. 2,694 Mboe 46% PNP 196 Mboe 3% 2P Reserves by Asset PDP 431 Mboe 7% PUD 2,610 Mboe 44% Commentary Material recoverable Montney liquids-rich gas resource that has largely been de-risked GLJ Assessment across a portion of Donnybrook s Montney interest land yielded 2P Reserves + 2C Resource of 12,344 Mboe with a BT NPV10 of $111.3MM (1) Additional unbooked upside more than 70 potential net locations at Simonette and Resthaven 2P Reserves and Best Estimate Contingent Resource Bigstone Gas 1,000 Mboe 17% Bigstone Liquids 218 Mboe 4% Simonette / Resthaven Liquids 774 Mboe 13% 2C 6,413 Mboe 52% TP 3,237 Mboe 26% Total 2P Reserves = 5,931 Mboe Simonette / Resthaven Gas 3,940 Mboe 66% 2P Reserves + 2C Resource = 12,344 Mboe Prob. 2,695 Mboe 22% (1) GLJ Reserves and Resource Assessment effective April 30, 2012 11
Experienced Management Team Experienced Management Team Malcolm Todd, President, CEO & Director Over 25 years of experience in senior positions with private and publicly traded oil and gas companies including Prairie Exploration through its sale in 2010 and Prairie Pacific Energy through its sale in 2006 Murray Scalf, COO & Director Experience in building oil and gas exploration and production companies over the past 25 years; many of which were ultimately acquired by intermediate producers, including Dorado Energy, Denim Exploration Corp., and Dorchester Energy Inc Terry Skilnick, Geologist Geologist with over 12 years experience of successfully identifying economic resource opportunities; three junior oil and gas companies built on his qualified recommendations and insight, including Denim Exploration, which was ultimately sold in 2005 Robert Todd, CFO Over 25 years of experience in senior positions with private and publicly traded natural resource companies including Prairie Exploration through its sale in 2010 and Prairie Pacific Energy through its sale in 2006 Strong Board of Directors David Patterson, Chairman and Director Chairman of Donner Metals Ltd. Randy Kwasnicia, Director Director of Total Energy Services Inc. Ken Stephenson, Director Director of Calvalley Petroleum Inc., US Oil Sands Inc. Colin Watt, Director President and CEO of Lynden Energy Corp. Malcolm Todd, President, CEO & Director President, CEO and Director of Donnybrook Energy Inc. Murray Scalf, COO & Director COO and Director of Donnybrook Energy Inc. 12
Corporate Summary (millions unless otherwise stated) Capitalization Summary (TSXV: DEI) (1) Share Price (C$/sh) (2) $0.12 Shares Outstanding Basic 193.8 Options (3) - FD Shares Outstanding 193.8 Market Capitalization $22.3 Less: Positive Net Working Capital (4) ($3.9) Enterprise Value $18.4 (1) As per company financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2012 (2) November 20, 2012 market close (3) Treasury Stock M ethod (4) Current Liabilities - Current Assets Options Dilutive Securities Exercise Price Equivalent Shares Tranche 1 $0.125 5.6 Tranche 2 $0.200 5.0 Tranche 3 $0.400 2.3 Tranche 4 $0.500 4.0 Tranche 5 $0.500 0.1 Total / Weighted Avg $0.28 17.0 TSM - Dilution - Key Attributes Approximately 12% of the corporation s shares are held by insiders Resource tax pools of approximately $39MM (5) Debt free Resource Study completed with Total Proved plus Probable and Best Estimate Contingent Resources BT NPV10 of $111.3MM Total Dilutive Securities 17.0 (5) As at October 9, 2012 13
Conclusion Concentrated asset base Material, liquids-rich gas resource potential Significant growth potential greater than 80 net potential drilling locations De-risked, development ready assets Top decile WCSB play economics Debt free company Additional development drilling planned in H1 2013 14
Corporate Information Bank: Legal: Engineering: ATB Financial (Calgary, Alberta) Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (Calgary, Alberta) GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. (Calgary, Alberta) Fekete Engineering Software & Services (Calgary, Alberta) Transfer Agent: Computershare Trust Company of Canada Donnybrook Energy Inc. 700, 717-7th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta, T2P 0Z3, Canada Telephone: (403) 237-5700 Facsimile: (403) 265-3506 mfwtodd@donnybrookenergy.ca 15