Marketing Research Report No. 961

Similar documents
COTTON GIN OPERATING COSTS IN THE MIDSOUTH: 1973/74 AND 1977/78

Economic Research Service United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 286

PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITIES

Cotton Gin Operating Costs in the San Joaquin Valley of California /72 and 1972/73

Before analysing the problem of public debt of State Governments in

SmallBizU WORKSHEET 1: REQUIRED START-UP FUNDS. Online elearning Classroom. Item Required Amount ($) Fixed Assets. 1 -Buildings $ 2 -Land $

ACTIVITY RATIO OF THE CEMENT COMPANIES

This is a placeholder for agenda item No. 9: Receive and File Treasurer Report for June 2012 as determined by the Council's meeting on 8/07/2012.

ANNUAL REPORT OF TO THE OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDING, 20 TO BE FILED NOT LATER THAN 90 DAYS AFTER FISCAL YEAR ENDS

Second Rural Access Project Credit No YEM STATEMENT OF SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS 31 DECEMBER 2015

RAPIDES ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS ALEXANDRIA LOUISIANA FINANCIAL REPORTS JUNE 30, 2006

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL rd Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA

AUDITOR'S REPORT "NIISLEL-AUDIT" LLC. Ulaanbaatar Clean Air Project No.5039-MN Financial statements as of December 31, 2016

TEXAS EDWARDS PLATEAU WESTERN

Kenya Gazette Supplement No nd June, 2007 CORRIGENDUM

Cotton Gin Fires in Arizona, California and New Mexico to

THE WOODROW WILSON NATIONAL FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. June 30, 2014

116.. Hosaka, Rotherham & Company

Full file at CHAPTER 3

QUALIFIED PAID CIRCULATION BY ISSUES. Digital Only. Total Paid. Print Only

MINUTES. Long-Range Planning Committee UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA BOARD OF TRUSTEES

-9- COASTAL BERMUDAGRASS HAY, DRYLAND, TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT

Gromo Trade & Consultancy Limited (Formerly Kamalakshi Finance Corporation Limited) CIN: L67120MH1973PLC016243

INCOME TAX CHECKLIST TAXPAYER SSN NAME BIRTHDATE OCCUPATION SPOUSE SSN NAME BIRTHDATE OCCUPATION ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE

WASHINGTON STREET HOPE CENTER, INC.

INCOME TAX CHECKLIST TAXPAYER SSN NAME BIRTHDATE OCCUPATION SPOUSE SSN NAME BIRTHDATE OCCUPATION ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE

SIGNIFICANT PROVISIONS OF STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE LAWS JANUARY 2008

0. 6. a-c-ji 5 u i fie '1. day before election Runoff. Month Day Year ri Primary Runoff I I Other Description 5 / 9,,--/ I 5 tz General ri Special

858 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 02/17/82.

U.S. Consumer Sentiment Jan 2011 Jan 2012

ANNEX. to the Commission decision on the reimbursement of personnel costs of beneficiaries of the Connecting Europe Facility

To: From: Rodolfo Sanchez, RTA, CSTA Director of Tax Collections. Date: October 16, 2014

(Accrual and Prepayment)

4/ :34. LZli. 2-3pm 3-4pm 4-Spm. Monday Total Utilization (Jan/Feb 1992) 30% 20% 1 40% 50% 70% 60% (101 80% U JO b.

Ministry of Education and Higher Education Republic of Lebanon - Second Education Development Project - EDP I - Loan# 7966

Ministry of Education and Higher Education, Republic of Lebanon - Second Education Development Project - EDP II - Loan# 7966

Analyzing and Recording Transactions QUESTIONS

UNIFORM SALES & USE TAX EXEMPTION/RESALE CERTIFICATE MULTIJURISDICTION

5: 5.1 Multiplying Polynomials. Chapter. Polynomials. 3x- 5. Math 1OC. Name:

S. FinflnCIRL DATA. Week ending August 2, MONEY STOCK (Pages 5 and 12) Prepared by Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Released: August 4, 1967

Tax Return Questionnaire Tax Year

MARY RYDER HOME AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. DECEMBER 31, 2016 and 2015

EXHIBIT 2: ANNUAL TIPPING FEE ADJUSTMENT. Disposal Services Contract

Tax Return Questionnaire Tax Year

Texas Economic Outlook: Cruising in Third Gear

After analysing the Operational performance of IDBI, the researcher. has made an attempt to assess its financial performance from three points of

NON-FLEET TRUCKING APPLICATION NEW VENTURE (1 to 2 Power Units)

18. EXHIBITS TO VALUATION REPORT OF. DiMARTINI & SONS

Tax Freedom Day 2019 is April 16th

2018 Texas Economic Outlook: Firing on All Cylinders

Municipal Budget. City of Seagraves. This budget includes a proposed tax rate of Tel Hill

HOLIDAY EXPRESS, INC. Financial Statements April 30, 2017 and 2016 With Independent Auditors' Report

GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED MYT Petition, True-up Petition Formats - Transmission

How to Prepare Your Taxes

tft Ontario I ek b 1 C H.t Financial Statement Auditor s Report L Supplementary filing including finances after December 31 (or c6 /3-3qz-7l

CLASSIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS UNIFORM ACCOUNTING SYSTEM LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT STATE OF FLORIDA

CONTINGENT COVERAGES AVAILABLE FOR AUTO LESSORS

A NEW MEASURE OP FISCAL PRIVILEGE

Income Expense Report. Category Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total Monthly Total Monthly Love INC 2017 Average Average Income

Uinta Basin Energy Summit Economic Overview September 10, 2015

CPA Australia Plan Your Own Enterprise Competition

SUN-KAP ENTERPRISES,LLC TAX AND FINANCIAL PLANNING 1260 Huntington Dr., Suite 205 South Pasadena, CA Phone Fax

Preparing Your Projections

N~e of I'Jperiment...\. ~ Date...&.LCJ./..~o./.6... Page No.D - - A. h\~c- Experi';'ent No. Experiment Result..

Linda S.Wo)druff. CPA A Professional Corporation

O GrantThornton. Project's Financial Statements and Independent Auditors' Report

presentation, which occurred on May 19, 2014 as part of the Council' s regular Budget Hearing.

Allen L. Kockler Company 2018 Tax Organizer

Fiscal Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS. City Organizational Chart Page 6

County Legislature FTE (Full Time Equivalent) by Home Department

Local Option Gas Tax 104,847.80

GROOTS KENYA GRANT NO:TF JSDF GRANT FOR ACCELERATING RURAL WOMEN'S ACCESS TO AGRICULTURAL MARKETS AND TRADE PROJECT

Variance Total Budget Amounts 26,296,028 $ 25,681, ,310 Sept.13 To Apr. 14 YTD Coll. (Net of Discounts) $ 24,075,402 $ 24,237,873 (162,472)

Introduction January 10, 2019

Audit of the Financial Statement of the "Conseil National de la Recherche Scientific" CAPWATER Project No. P Beirut - Republic of Lebanon

UNIFORM SALES & USE TAX CERTIFICATE

GADSDEN CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION, INC. AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2018 and 2017

Happy New Year! We would like to wish you and your family health, happiness and increased prosperity throughout It s also tax time again!!!

AUTO LEASE Insurance Program

TEXAS UPPER COAST SOIL RESOURCE AREA 21

CODES FOR PHARMACY ONLINE CLAIMS PROCESSING

FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Long Form)

Proposed Budget. City of Seagraves. This budget includes a proposed tax rate of Tel Hill

Town of Pembroke Park Budget Amendment

ROLAND & DIELEMAN 2018 TAX WORKSHEET

2017 Schedule C Business Tax Organizer Gurr & Company LLC

SPECIAL REPORT INCOME RECOGNITION. STATE TAX IMPACT. Generally, states use federal gross income,

SOUTHWESTERN LOUISIANA HOMELESS COALITION, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOUNTANTS* COMPILATION REPORT. December 31, 2006 and 2005

2017 TAX PROFORMA/ORGANIZER

CITY OF HAILEY BALANCE SHEET JANUARY 31, 2016 GENERAL FUND TOTAL ASSETS 2,025,537.16

Fill-in-the-Blank Equations. Exercises

50-State Property Tax Comparison Study: For Taxes Paid in Executive Summary

There being a quorum present, Mr. Combs called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m.

City of El Centro REVOLVING LOAN FUND (RLF)

OSU Name. OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE Farm Description

UNIVERSITY Of ILLINOIS LIBRARY. at URBANACHAMPAKai STACKS

Start the cashflow in the month you expect to receive theloan, regardless whether you have started

TAX ORGANIZER Page 3

Steven R. Perryman, CPA INDIVIDUAL TAX RETURN ENGAGEMENT LETTER

CALHOUN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND VISITORS CENTER

Transcription:

Marketing Research Report No. 961 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRCULTURE Enomic Research Service

ABSTRACT Average operating sts per bale of 42 West Texas gins for the 197-71 season were: out-of-pocket--$2.1, down $1.65 or 7.6 percent from the 1969-7 season; total--$24.7, down $2.82 or 1.5 percent; and total standardized-- $26.82, down $2.66 or 9 percent. The plants, grouped by rated hourly capacity, ginned 16 percent of the total West Texas tton crop. mpared with 1969-7, ginning volumes were up and sts down from all gin size groups. The average ginning volume for all groups increased 22 percent for the season, while the average rate of gin plant capacity use was up 9 percentage points--from 39 to 48 percent. Keywords: tton, ginning, sts, capacity, utilization. PREFACE This is the fifth annual report of tton gin operating sts based on a sample of West Texas gins. Previous reports are: tton Gin Operating sts in West Texas, U.S. Dept. Agr., MRR-831, Nov. 1968. tton Gin Operating sts in West Texas, 1966-67 and 1967-68, U.S. Dept. Agr., MRR-844, Mar. 1969. tton Gin Operating sts in West Texas--1968-69, U.S. Dept. Agr., MRR-93, Sept. 197. tton Gin Operating sts in West Texas--1969-7, U.S. Dept. Agr., MRR-934, Aug. 1971. Objectives of the research are to (1) determine the current sts of ginning on the igh Plains of West Texas and observe trends over time, (2) analyze the effects of changes in ginning volumes on ginning sts, and (3) nsider the possibilities of reducing operating sts through more efficient ginning. Gin st information'and rerds are mailed in annually for use in preparing these reports. The authors express their appreciation to the gin owners, managers, and acuntants for their ntinued support and assistance in this work. Washington, D.C. 225 June 1972 ii

TTON GN OPERATNG STS N WEST TEXAS--197-71 by Dale L. Shaw and Charles A. Wilmot Agricultural Enomists Marketing Enomics Division NTRODUCTON This report, although ndensed, retains the same basic format as that for the 1969-7 season (see preface). The rates used to calculate standardized depreciation and interest sts were changed to more accurately reflect actual interest and depreciation rates. They are discussed in the appendix under sting methods. The gin sample is stratified into four groups, based on rated hourly capacities of the gin stand mplexes. These are: group 1--8 bales or less; group 2--9 to 11 bales; group 3--12 to 2 bales; and group 4--21 bales or more. Size and ntent of the gin sample vary slightly from year to year, mainly because of periodic plant modifications which frequently alter capacity. This necessitates an annual review and reclassification of some plants into other size groups and the filling of voids thus created. During the 197-71 season, the 42 plants in the sample ginned a total of 254,789 bales--16. percent of the total ginnings for the West Texas area. FNDNGS Volumes ginned.--average volumes ginned were up this season, resulting in higher rates of gin plant capacity utilization, 1/ and lower per bale operating sts. mpared with last season, volumes in 197-71 ranged from 1 percent higher for group 1 plants to 53 percent higher for group 2 plants; for all groups mbined, average volume increased 22 percent (table 1). Larger ginning volumes resulted in higher rates of ginning capacity utilization in each size group. The gin capacity utilization rate for all groups mbined increased 9 percentage points over last year--to 48 percent--the highest level since the 1965-66 season when the all-group average was 65 percent. sts per bale at actual percentages of capacity utilization.--total sample gin sts 2/ per bale were down in 197-71 from 1969-7 for all size groups 1/ Ratio of volume ginned to estimated total seasonal ginning capacity without seed-tton storage. Based on typical ginning season of 96 operating hours and a sustained seasonal ginning rate capability set at 85 percent of rated capacity. 2/ Taken from gin rerds and submitted to uniform allocation procedures as outlined in the appendix. 1

Table l.--rated hourly capacities, volumes ginned, and capacity utilization, by ranges and averages, sample gin plants, West Texas, 1969-7 and 197-71 seasons Rated hourly : Annual volume : Rate of capacity Gin size group: capacity jj : ginned utilization 2/ by season : Range Average Range Average Range Average - -- - - - - - - - Bales - - - - - - - - - - - Percent - - - 1969-7: Group 1...: 7-8 7.6 1,135-5,193 3,17 18-84 53 Group 2...: 9-11 9.1 1,123-4,188 2,294 16-6 33 Group 3...: 12-2 16.2 1,595-11,613 5,179 12-86 42 Group 4...: 21-6 32.4 3,464-13,991 9,123 14-77 37 mbined...: 7-6 16.5 1,123-13,991 4,987 12-84 39 197-71: Group 1...: 7-8 7.6 1,727-5,659 3,43 28-92 59 Group 2...: 9-11 9.2 1,957-5,23 3,517 28-69 5 Group 3...: 12-2 15.8 2,1-13,4 6,93 2-19 5 Group 4...: 21-6 32.7 3,78-15,444 1,954 12-81 44 mbined...: 7-6 16.5 1,727-15,444 6,66 12-19 48 1/ Based on observations and manufacturers' ratings of gin stand mplexes. Variations in group average between seasons are due to sample gin plant modifications which altered rated capacity and size group classifications. 2/ Ratio of volume ginned to estimated total seasonal ginning capacity without seed tton storage. Based on typical ginning season of 96 operating hours and a sustained seasonal ginning rate capability set at 85 percent of rated capacity. (tables 2 and 3). For all groups mbined, the average was $24.7 per bale, a decrease of $2.82 from last season. 3/ Group 2, which howed the greatest increase in average rate of capacity utilization over last year, also showed the greatest reduction in average total st--from $29.27 to $23.29 per bale. Standardized sample gin st 4/ averages ranged from $26.19 for group 4 to $28.63 for group 1, with an average st of $26.82 per bale for all groups mbined. Last year, this st range was $27.82 for group 4 to $33.7 for group 2; the average for all groups mbined was $29.48 per bale. Out-of-pocket sts ranged from $18.2 per bale for group 4 to $22.7 for group 1. The average for all four groups mbined was $2.1 per bale. mpared 3/ See weighting procedure in appendix. 4/ See sting methods in appendix. 2

- -'-4, o -: C) -. o c-, 4-4,-4 O1 t 4 cc. La. -4 P. C.) N) 4-i 4-) C.) 4-4 ) 4-C ) ) 4-C ) Q) c'-cl 4 N. C'-) N. 1-4 D '.C) O Cl) O ) ' t C4 C N) C t Ln m ) Q N. t ) ) C'-) C') u) C'). N).z1 CC V C') C' 4J N) csj N) - C) -4 ),-4..zf N. N. '-4 '-4 Cf' C ) '-4.-4 Cr) N) t Cr) C Cr) C) f ) ) N. N..d..1- Cr).. 1 N) 4 C Cr) N. N- -. ).Zf N. C) N) C'-),4 Cf).-4 ' 1-4 N) N) Cr) N) N. Cr) CC Cr) -4 '-4 ) C C Cr) N. C N. if) 4 Cr) C Cr) ) C r-c Ct) l),-4 C) N) - ' - C N). C N) ). NC-.,4 ) N) -.T CX).t ) 4 ) N. Li') C' N) 'C) C'-) Cr).zt C ' ) ) 4 C'-) N.... C ' N) N).z1 N).1.-4 if). Ct) C'-) N. N) N) 4.4 > -O n N. t C'-) Cr) C' C ) ) ) N. ) N..J ca ) C) tc C ' C C'-) U) N. C'-)..) N. C,... -.4 4 - t -1 C'-) C') N..- N.,- ) <4- N. ) N),-4 N) -4 -.- *.,-4.-4 N) N).- ) C C C Ct) N. C.. - Cr) N),-4,-4 C'-) C'-) Li', ) C '-4 tt 4. O,- C') C' C'-,- C N) 4 C C) N) --4 C) Q,- ) ' 4). -4 <4- N) C C t N. C'-),-4 ' Cr) C Cr, C' ) ' (3) C ('-C Cl) N),-4 C ) t -- ) ) C'-),-4 C- C.)... C'- C') if) C'- C'- if N) 41-r4 ' N) N) N) Cl),.. ) $1 1.4 Cl),-4 t Cf) Cr) N. it) C') N) if) N),-4 Cr 14 CL) 'N. 4L..- N) N..- - Ct) ).-4 U) N. ) -.- it)...... W.4 C.-4 if) C C'-) N. <4- Ct) N. N) Cr) N. ) N) Cl) - C) U') ' (D 44) 4-4 ' N).,.4 N) N) ) N) N. C'-) N) Ct) Cr),-4 C'-) '-4,'. 1.) ),-4 4 N. it) C - C N) C N. Cl) o.14.... Q Cr) N) C'),-S N) C C N),-S N) 1-4 C') N) 4-i,4.) 4 * CL) t) t t C'-) N. C)) Cl) ' N. 14 C p Cr) if) C'.- ) C) 41 C C N) N) N. C') Cl),- N. - - 4.4 )) 'C) d f) C') L U') r) ) t C") N ) ' C') N) Cl) "),-1,-4.,-4,-4-4, ' - N. -4 C -4 Cr) r) 1-4 -4 CL) Cr) f) C,-4 Cr) C' ) Cr) N. N. N) ON N) o 4J P -,-4 (l)c)1.4 O,-4 Cr) N. N. N. ) - N) ' <4-14 Ci.,4 Cr) t),-4 f) 4L 44-4- -,4 ) C r) N. r) -,.4 4.4,.4 N) N) C' C N. t) N. N),-4 C' 1-4 C.) ' 44 44 CCX. Cr) C').- C O N) t 4, > 1-4 N) ',_44-) ;:S 4 14-4 14 ' ).'t) N. 1 t) ' N. N. C N. - - L) - 44 N - C C ' N) N. N. - N) ) 4) -.-4 4.4 4 Cr) N) f) Cr) 1- N) N) Cr).- N. Cr) N) C4 PoC) ' ( ' 4L )4 44 N) N) N). '-,C )444.4 'C) O). 4444.-4 N) C ),-4 N. - Cr) N. Cr) t 14 ) '4-4 '-4 '. N) -- f) rl SO.- L) N. Cr) C N. Cr) 4 N) ' C) b- OC') N) r) t N.. t - r) ) 4. 4j - 44,' - ') N) ' N. ) N) C') N) N),_ ' () l) -1,- o. N) tn) N. C C ' t t C 44.-4 4C)14 N) 1-1 - N) C'-),-1 N. _: C N),4-4 U ) - 4') 4-1.(1)1... 4J1-4' 4... - -.. j, 4-i. -. (.4. -.. SO,_4C)..4LUO 4-..- - Li-)j N - C).. -, - -.d -.- - ' 44 C). - ' ' 4 ' Cd 4,) ' a.)-lr) Cd W-'-4'C-4.. -. -- NN '.,-4--4'O 4- - -4 - -,-4-4.a Q 4-4Q CX Cd '-'C) - o.ci 4-4- C)1-4O) 4-J 41 )4. Cd )-L,--1 1, C)))) 4 ) ().,4)'-4 C'). 44 44 -,-4-1- 44 4-1 ' 14 'C (1) C). 44Q 44 ) O.4-) --. "- 44),O..,4ON)Cr).zff))S - 4J' -,-4 - c, - ' 4-i 4 ' Cl) '-4. -4 - -4 'CL) C) 4-.-1 ' -'-4 4- - 'C) - 44, ) z 3

) ) ) o ) - 1-i Ci N-. o N- cn oll 34 ) Ci) El 41 -. CC ) o Ci. o 14 Cci 1-4 ci) -4 cc. 3- Ci). 1_ ca 14 NJ C- 1-4 - o. 14 ) 34. 3-4 ci) 1-4. C) 34-4.1 Ci) o Ci 1-4 ci). ca 41 u (71 ' 1 3' NJ Cfl f C r-. N- N- C) cl) cq oo r- C> cq C')' C 1 C c'c -.J-.t NJ ' NJ NJ NJ - 4} 41 ) i N- N- '' NJ n ' NJ ON N- 3-4 N r- ' NJ NJ' C' C" NJ 3' N p.14 3 En Q) 3 C") ' C") N- NJ n n NJ C') n 11111111 3 - C C") C") 1 ') ) C N f C 3' NJ. N- n N- - 3' f) Q C) NJ Cci....... 1-4 4. ' NJ C w 14 r-i NJ p, oi)4.i.) 34 114.4 N- C NJ N- n NJ NJ -? T N- Q 3'.-4 4.1.-1 C") C") ') NJ NJ N- C C C") - C 1-4 Ci)'3 N 1; C" 1; - NJ n C" ' Ci) Ci) 34 1-1 NJ Q ) )4.1 4.4 O ) 4 - ') ' NJ - C n -. n C") NJ ON N- C C NJ ') ') NJ NJ C- N- C') -d 4 n NJ C" N- C) NJ r) 3' N '3.,-4 NJ - C - ) ci 1111111 _j Q) ) ') - C ' C") t') '3 C") NJ. C') NJ N- ' n N- C") C NJ. P. 4.i,-i - ) u C" NJ (' N N- C" NJ -1 NJ. CJ '3 - Ci.- p rd p N- C') N- -t C') NJ '3 C") C") ) ). N- C") NJ C C") ' NJ C N-..... N- NJ. NJ NJ 1; C") C") NJ ') -) C") -'.,-4c.,- '3 NJ ' ) NJ NJ 41.14 '3 14... )4.4 4.1 '3 N- C C t') '1' N- C") % ' N- C") N C N- NJ C") NJ ' C ') N- NJ -' NJ 't 14 4-4........ ). n C") C") c) f C C") NJ -' n N-, Ci) NJ C") Cl) G) Ci 41 4. 3 Q)4) cc) C") ON ON N- N- ' ' ON ON cq 4- NJ n NJ ' t C ') N- '.. i C) N o n u Ci -. '3 J.) NJ.14) NJ.34 ).Qi ) " 4.1 Ci) NJ C N- NJ - ' n n ') C') NJ C') 1 i r N- C") -' N- f) 3') C n n NJ ' C") n 4 Ci.. C. C") 1; NJ C" C). C C" C ' 4.1 '3 NJ C - NJ )d) )Ci-r-Q 34) -) ) Cci C") C') C') T ' NJ ON N- -''3 NJ -' 1 Cl) 4.1.4 D. C"). ) n f C N-N-NJ ' C) N-f) C Ci). NJ - 4-1 3-4 ) n C") ' Cl) ' N- -4 -' ) C") -' ci) Ci 14 41 4.1 C"') 1,-4 1-i 4-1 11111131 n ') - NJ C' 4J4-14- ON f " f C NJ ' NJ NJ N- N- n N- 1). '4-4 4-4 Ci N-., ' NJ OCi'34 34 NJ " C4 r4 n C C- 34 ci). ).)Ci) > ) ) '3 4J-J 14.4 '3.) C") C ' ' ' oll t') ' ' C") C') '3 -.-4. ') ON Ni N- C C '3 C"') SO 34 4.1. N..... Ci. i 4-JO4-i N n N NJ C") ' C") NJ NJ 34 Ci'3 Ci '3 NJ NJ NJ ))4.1) 34.dl-4')Cci4-4 - )3414-4 '3 3-1 14.ci) ) - C n N- t 1 C 3 C') C') cf) Cl) 34 14 N- C') n (O' N C 3') ') N. 4) 44 C. '3 d N ' C" n C n ) E..Ci4 Cl) C") Ci) Ci. i) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o 4J.,4 C ) ') SO N- '3 NJ n N- 4.1 '3 C) ' NJ -' ' ') C-i ON NJ -' n C.'3. 34 4,-43 ' NJ N C - NJ - 4 Ci 1-1 NJ NJ o Ci )..4 7'3 44 4.1 '3...-W) cli.... - 414 ). - w. 44-' Ci 'O ECiW 4.4...... Ci)- - ')..) Ci Ci Ci ci) N ).r4) Ci. Q'-,4 o, ( 4.1..14 -.. - '3 i 34. Ci - '3-4-) n -i - C/) '1-4 ') Cci )'l ' O (14.1) 4.1... 4-1 ).)..Cci. 11)114.1 '). cci,-4-do El 3ci) -Cci 41 4.1 -,- ).) 4-1.. Ci. 4-4 )4.1 Ci) CJ 1)) cci - 141 OO 4-1 Ci 14)14)4 4.14.1 144Ci)OCci.) )ci).-34 1, Ci 34 c (O.-C/). ci) 34 34 4 (i) 4-i 34 El '3. -Ci U 344 Ci. 4-4 14Ci)Ci d) 34 (1) Q) co)4.. --- --- C ).41 Ci)'d. - - 1 Ci))Ci)Ci)-.-.NJC") -'nlso Z ) Ci 41 - Q) O U) C/) Ci 4

with last season, average out-of-pocket sts in 197-71 were lower in all size groups, ranging from $.7 less per bale for group 1 to.69 less for group 2; these two showed the smallest and largest increases in average rates of capacity utilization. The average drop in out-of-pocket sts from 1969-7 to 197-71 was $1.65 per bale for all groups mbined. For all groups mbined, individual items making up out-of-pocket sts were all lower in 197-71 than in 1969-7, except for bagging and ties which remained the same for both years. Labor had the greatest drop in average st from the previous season, followed by management, repairs, and miscellaneous, in that order. Decreases in these four items amounted to $.54, $.39, $.25, and $.21 per bale. Regardless of sting method used, group 4 averaged the lowest st, even though plants in this group operated at the lowest average rate of capacity utilization. st per bale at 7-percent capacity utilization.--to allow st mparisons at the same relative ginning volume levels, group average sts were adjusted to a uniform rate of 7-percent capacity utilization (table 4). 5/ This adjustment lowered sts per bale substantially for all groups, pointing up the beneficial effect of increased volumes on unit operating sts regardless of plant size (tables 2, 3, and 4). The actual st advantages of group 4 over other groups (table 3) were further increased with the introduction of uniform rates of capacity utilization. This supports the theory that enomies of scale are available in large-size plants if ginning volumes are large enough to ensure relatively high rates of capacity utilization. mpared with 1969-7, adjusted sts were higher in group 1, but lower in all other size categories except group 4 standardized total. For all groups mbined, at 7-percent capacity use, sts for management, insurance, taxes, standardized depreciation, and standardized interests 6/ increased in 197-71 over 1969-7; sts for bagging and ties remained the same; and all other sts showed small decreases. 5/ See st Adjustmentments in appendix. 6/ Standardized interest st per bale was $.28 higher. owever, $.23 of the st increase was due to a change in the standardized interest rate from 7 to 8 percent. 5

. Cl). ci -) ' r4 4JC)j l)) N N-- 4- cic) N- 4-i CiCi rl. (Jo N- - 4-il cia-' \ Ci. C)cd N->4 4-i Q) U) Q) -i N. 4-jci ( r4 OE 1, S555 C'- ci (1) () C' ON O C') C) \C) ( C') G C- C) a-\ N CC' <') <4 C') C') C') r C'). C') C') Cl) o E CC' -1- -,t CC' C- -' ON C' <') C) ' N- C' C') C' an -i. C) 41 C') C) ' C' ( N- N- C) C') ON -Zr C' ' r4 C') CC' N ' C) C) ' an C' C' ON C') 'ci..... C') CC' CC' CC' N N- N C) (C' C') C') (1) ci N N P. P. - t Cd Cl) C') N- (DN C' C' C') \ C' -Zr C') C') N- O\ an C') C') C' -' (\ N- <') C) C' -Zr -' fl 11 ci - Ci..... Q C') CC' C') CC' CC' -' C) N r4 CC' 1-4 >4 $i 4- C') C') 1,- P. ci ( ci Ci ci -'-4 C) -Zr N- C) ' N- C' ' -Zr Cl) N- -Zr P. 4-i ( 41 CC' CC' CC' N- C') ON ' C' C' ' C) C) ON C' D4 ci ci ci..... -Cl) CC' C' C') -1- C') C') C' CC',-1 ril 14 C') C') (3) U) ci i-i D. 41 Cl) E ci, r-4 4.1 -ci Ci C) 14 "ci C' N- C' T -zt ' -Zr C) C') N r4 U) cn N C') N- C) C) CC' C' C' -:1- C' C' ' C) 'Ci N ' OEa C') CC' -z N C') C'). CC' 4i Ci d 'ci C') C') C'Ci ( Cl). ci c1 4- ci D.ci 4i a' C) C' N -1 C) N ' N- C) CC' N- <C' ci ) 4i C' C') C') N- -Zr ON C') C' ' C') N- a' ' -zr - 4)...144) Cl) CC' C') C' N C') C) ci 6 Cl) $-i 'ci 4-1 C') Ci ci 1-O Cl) D4-' Cl) ci ci -Zr N a' C') Cl) -Ct -Zr ¼ -Zr -Zr C' CC' C' C' -1- ) ol C') -, C) C) CC' N- O\ LC' C') C)' -')- Q). U)E 41 C') Zr CC' CC' C') N- C' CC' N,-4 i-i 4) - C') 44 ci 4-1. 4-4- Ci Cl).,').,.4 l) ci -tj 1-4 C) C' N- C') N- -C- ' a' CC' ' C' f1 ci ci P. r,: C') C') C' N- a' a' CC' C' CC' C') C' -Zr CC' Ci >... 17:.... o "ci 4J C') CC' C') -Zr CC' C) C') C') -1 -CT 4-i Ci. 4-4 C') C') C') ci ci a' rj-,-4.41 N 4-iCl)4J Cl) ' LC' N- ON -Zr C' ' C') ON C) -Zr C') Ci Ci "ci C' CC' CC' C) C' C) a' N- ' >4 Ci.ci -. 4 Cl) CC' C' CC' N -Zr N C' i ci 4.) 14 4 4-i ciocicid. $-1 Cl) D. ()- '- 4-) Ci. D. "d Ci. Ci).. --'cibo... ( ci -.. ci - ci ci -... Ln -i-. c1 -o ci E P..... O - -- 41$-1 Ci14>4W C' r, Ci >4 44 ' 4-i ' 41. 4-i 111 ) -d ci 4-1 E 4-' (flcio 4-i.. O) ci - i-i 4i4-))Ci. Ci CiciD. 4-1.. l)j-i N ci<l).4-1 r-,. D. Cl) CJ Ci.41 'ti -d Cl) i4 E 4-i... Cl)CiEciciCi ;j.. - O ) 4-i U,,4-4. " 4-i <1 14 <1 <1. Ci - 'tici C ci'4-4 4-4 4-i.. ç). NN 4-i.cici-"ciO W CCJ ci 4-i. r4r4 cicid.d. Ci ti-i. O(4E 4Ji Eci O) Cl)ci c4 ->-- Ci CC'L) E-4C,DCDciC) 14 <1 14 Ui 4.4 aj 4.).j " 4.) "j 41 Cl) ci 14 <1 Ci ci 14 ci ci - - U) -S E ci >4 <1OD. P. 4.J C') 4l CC'SztC' Z Cl)ciCl)ci 4 4.i4) 1-i 1-4 ci

APPENDX: METODOLOGY Gins vary widely by type of organization, ownership structure, acunting procedures used, and in many other ways. n analyzing sts reported by sample gins, uniform allocation procedures were employed to mpensate for some of these differences. sts of hauling ttonseed and lint--such as truck drivers' wages, truck depreciation, insurance, road-use taxes, and associated truck-operating sts-- were excluded. st Allocations Management: Where applicable, includes salaries, bonuses, mmissions, expense allowance, house rent, and personal insurance policies for owners and managers; bookkeeping and other office salaries, home office (line mpanies); social security taxes, workmen's mpensation insurance, and any other insurance on management and office personnel. Depreciation: ncludes allowances for depreciation exactly as carried on gin rerds except under standardized and out-of-pocket sts. nterest: ncludes interest exactly as carried on gin rerds except under standardized and out-of-pocket sts. nsurance: ncludes st of all forms of insurance on gin buildings, equipment, housing furnished management and labor, tton products, and automotive equipment (except large trucks and trailers). Taxes: ncludes all taxes on real property only. Energy: ncludes st of all utilities--electricity, gas, and water--used in ginning and directly related operations. Labor: ncludes st of gin wages, social security, workmen's mpensation, and any other insurance of gin labor borne by the gin; plus any rental housing furnished labor (excludes gin repair labor; see "Repairs" below). Bagging and ties: ncludes actual st of bagging and ties purchased. Repairs: ncludes st of gin repair wages, social security, workmen's mpensation, and other insurance on gin repair labor borne by the gin; plus the the st of repair materials and supplies. Miscellaneous: ncludes st of mbined car and pickup, tractor, and other automotive outlays; telephone and telegraph; advertising and promotion; legal and audit; dues, memberships, and subscriptions; annual meetings and directors' fees and expense; nventions and travel expenses; donations and ntributions; tton losses from fire; sampling, mpressing, and related charges; gin and office supplies; and any other sts not included elsewhere. 7

sting Methods Sample gin sts: Gin sts which have been subjected to the above allocations are identified in this report as sample gin sts. Standardized sample gin sts: Sample gin sts from which the effects of variations in rates used in mputing depreciation and interest have been eliminated by adopting uniform rates. Depreciation was set at 7 percent of the initial purchase price of capital items carried on the depreciation schedule regardless of age or former method of depreciation. Standardized depreciation sts shown in this report for 1969-7 are approximately 3 percent lower than those shown in tton Gin Operating sts in West Texas--1969-7 (U.S. Dept. Agr. Mktg. Res. Rpt. No. 934), owing to a change in the standardized depreciation rate from 1 percent to 7 percent. This change was made to better reflect the useful life of ginning equipment and to be more mpatible with rates used in similar ginning st studies on other production areas. For 197-71, interest was charged at 8 percent on the estimated average gin site land values for the general area and 8 percent on one-half the st of buildings, machinery, and equipment. For 1969-7, an interest rate of 7 percent was used in both cases. Out-of-pocket sts: Sample gin sts from which depreciation and interest have been excluded. st Adjustments Estimates of ginning sts at other than existing levels of capacity utilization were based on relationships obtained from a recent study of model gins: Looney, Zolon M., and Wilmot, Charles A., Enomic Models for tton Ginning, U.S. Dept. Agr., Agr. En. Rept. 214, Oct. 1971. Weighting n mputing per bale st averages for all groups mbined, the simple weighted average for each group was further weighted by its representative proportion of the total rated hourly ginning capacity in West Texas. This was done to reflect more accurately the st of ginning an "average" bale of tton in West Texas. F;]

UNTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRCULTURE WASNGTON, D. C. 225 OFFCAL BUSNESS PENALTY FOR PRVATE USE, $3 POSTAGE AND FEES PAD U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRCULTURE