RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 1825 Third Street Riverside, CA November 17, 2005

Similar documents
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 1825 Third Street Riverside, CA May 24, 2007

CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 1825 Third Street Riverside, CA April 28, 2005

ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FISCAL YEAR (SUMMARY) (as approved by the Board of Directors, July 16,2018)

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at November 2014 compared to November 2013.

Victor Valley Transit Authority

Special Audit & Budget Review Meeting: FY16/17 Budget June 23, 2016

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 1825 Third Street Riverside, CA April 23, 2009

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at June 2014 compared to June 2013.

Victor Valley Transit Authority

DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 VALLEY EXPRESS BUDGET

Suburban Service and Regional ADA Budget Results January 2019

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at May 2014 compared to May 2013.

CAPITAL TRANSIT MISSION STATEMENT FY13 PROPOSED BUDGET $6,707,900 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CORE SERVICES FUNDING SOURCES FOR CAPITAL TRANSIT

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA

Jefferson Transit Authority Annual Budget. November 1, 2016 PROPOSED

Victor Valley Transit Authority

Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date May 31, 2017

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16

CTA s financial results are unfavorable by $0.5 million and $1.2 million for the month and year.

Solano County Transit

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Orange County Transportation Authority's Fiscal Year Budget Workshop. PowerPoint

FY06 Operating Budget. FY2006 Proposed Operating Budget. Final Summary for Board Referral

Public Transportation

4TH QUARTER 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

Greater Portland Transit District 114 Valley Street Portland ME 04102

San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Short-Range Transit Plan, FY 2016 FY 2020

Whatcom Transportation Authority. Annual Budget. WTA Draft Budget 1

CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA Big Blue Bus Fund (An Enterprise Fund of the City of Santa Monica) Basic Financial Statements and Required and Other

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at July 2015 compared to July 2014.

3 RD QUARTER 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

Federal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2%

Matthew Tucker North County Transit District Executive Director Oceanside, CA

Jefferson Transit Authority Annual Budget. November 14, 2017 PROPOSED

2016 Budget. Lakewood, Washington

Review and Discuss Staff Presentation on Draft GCTD Operating Budget for FY

Whatcom Transportation Authority

Budget Process Overview and Cost Allocation Methodology

Whatcom Transportation Authority

Public Transportation

Financial Plan. Section 8 STATUS QUO PLAN STATUS QUO PLAN ASSUMPTIONS STATUS QUO PLAN BUDGET ITEMS

AGENDA. Board Budget and Finance Committee Meeting Riverside Transit Agency Board Room 1825 Third Street Riverside, CA 92507

Milwaukee County Transit System

Spokane Transit Authority Adopted 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets. November 15, 2018 Board Meeting Resolution Number:

Governor s FY 2016 Revised, FY 2017 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 13, 2016

AGENDA. Regular Board of Directors Meeting Board Room Harry Oliver Trail Thousand Palms, CA 92276

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Select a draft Sounder fare structure change and fare increase for public review and comment

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015

Public Transportation

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Action Item III-A. July 10, 2014

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Item #4 JANUARY 30, 2015 MEETING MINUTES PG. 2 Approve the January 30, 2015 meeting minutes.

VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Imperial County Transportation Commission & ARC-Imperial Valley. Med-Express Transit Service Report For The Year Ended June 30, 2014

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 1825 Third Street Riverside, CA March 24, Vince Rouzaud, Chief Procurement and Logistics Officer

South County Transit -Projected Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Budget -Projected Five Year Capital Budget

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction

FINANCE/AUDIT COMMITTEE AGENDA October 25, :00 a.m. 12:00 a.m. Wellness Center SunLine Transit Agency Thousand Palms, CA

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. September 2012 (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY KEY BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016

SUBJECT: Board Approval: 2/12/04 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT RULES AND REGULATIONS

Item #4 FEBRUARY 10, 2015 MEETING MINUTES PG. 2 Approve the February 10, 2015 meeting minutes.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number: 99808

Operating Budget. Second Quarter Financial Report

The total budget for this department is $7,841,325, which funds the following services in these approximate amounts:

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO

VTA Short Range Transit Plan

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at February 2015 compared to February 2014.

PLEASE NOTE: The Chairman of the Board kindly requests that cell phones be turned off during the meeting RECOMMENDATION

Review of WMATA FY 2006 Operating Budget. Jurisdictional Coordination Committee Thursday, May 12, 2005

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT DIVISION BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Chapter 8. Financial Plan

Federal Transit Funding Crisis: A Message to Congress Presented by Alex Clifford, CEO Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District (METRO) 2017

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT Guidelines

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

Valley Metro Fiscal Year 2014 Financial Results. Budget and Finance Subcommittee October 9, 2014

BOARD BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2:00 P.M. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY BOARD ROOM 1825 THIRD STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92507

New York City Transit

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

State Grants (STA) Major Funding Sources (Except Sales Tax) Transit System. FY10 Adopted d Budget $0. Historically $8.5M/2% but has been as high as

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. December 2011 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

Transit Development Plan And 2013 Annual Report. Asotin County PTBA

Public Transportation

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. November 2012

Transportation Development Act. Local Transportation Fund CLAIM MANUAL FY 2017/18

PLEASE NOTE: The Chairman of the Board kindly requests that cell phones be turned off during the meeting RECOMMENDATION 1.

Spokane Transit Authority Adopted 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets. December 14, 2017 Board Meeting Resolution Number:

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, :00 A.M.

PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF COLUSA COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

Financial Management Report... 3

METRO. Fiscal Year 2014 Monthly Board Report. May 2014

TSCC Budget Review TriMet

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2004/05 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) CONEJO CONNECTION

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Information V-D. September 10, 2015

AGENDA. Meeting of the Connect Transit Board of Trustees. January 26, :30 P.M.

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. December 2012 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

Transcription:

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 1825 Third Street Riverside, CA 92507 November 17, 2005 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Summary: BOARD OF DIRECTORS Larry Rubio, Chief Executive Officer Chris Gallanes, Chief Financial Officer Fiscal Year 2006 Midyear Budget Update/Request for Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) and Budget Amendment In May 2005, the Agency Board of Directors adopted the fiscal year 2006 operating budget, capital budget, and SRTP. These budgets supported the Agency goals of increased ridership, reduction of job related injuries, excellent customer service, and cost reduction through improved efficiencies. They reflected a strategy for conservative service growth and future bus service planning, while being sensitive to forecasted fiscal constraints. The fiscal year 2006 operating budget provided resources to support a 5 percent increase in revenue service hours and a 6 percent increase in revenue service miles from fiscal year 2005 projections. A major feature was a planned implementation of Route 1 limited, part of the Infrastructure Improvement Project (IIP) phase of the Agency s Bus Rapid Transit initiative. Other service increases were planned for connections on feeder routes. Implementation of these service changes was contingent upon the sustainability of service in future fiscal years. Sustainability was based in part on increased farebox revenues that were projected as a result of a fare modification implemented in April 2005. Another sustainability component involved was consistency in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) revenues based on Riverside County sales tax projections. System-wide ridership at the Agency has decreased at a greater than anticipated rate. The Agency implemented a fare modification in April 2005. A ridership fare price elasticity of -2.0 was modeled for the fare modification. Based in this factor, a 25 percent fare increase would result in a 5 percent decrease in ridership. The actual decrease in ridership has been 10 percent. This 10 percent decrease has been consistent with industry-wide statistics. This 133

has adversely impacted previous staff farebox revenue projections. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) has presented data to its Board of Commissioners indicating that increasing operating expenses could outpace future LTF projections. Fuel prices have increased at greater than planned rates. Given the above events, staff has prepared a midyear budget amendment that reflects an adjusted service profile that postpones the implementation of Route 1 Limited and other service changes and maintains the level of service that is currently in place. It also reflects an adjustment to operating expenditures for changes in pricing. A proposed service change profile will be discussed, followed by an analysis of budget adjustments by cost element. The analysis will conclude with a profile of the revenues necessary to fund the midyear budget, as well as impact to Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) performance indicators and the farebox recovery ratio. Service Profile A comparative schedule of proposed service is shown below: FY2005 Actual Adopted Midyear Change Incr.+/(Decr.) Revenue Service Hours 605,420 638,250 615,787 (22,463) Revenue Service Miles 9,787,847 10,252,295 9,918,965 (333,330) Passengers 7,357,581 7,922,935 7,381,949 (540,986) Staff has monitored service statistics to measure the effect of the fare modification, inclement weather, and transit-related incidents that have occurred in recent months. Ridership has decreased at a greater than projected rate. Fare elasticity projections reflected a 5 percent decrease in ridership; the actual decrease has been at a 10 percent rate. Current forecasts anticipate increased ridership in the remaining fiscal year period, and by fiscal year end, ridership is projected to be 7,381,949. This is consistent with fiscal year 2005 actual ridership and revenue service hours. Projected ridership based on current revenue service hour projections reflect a decrease of 540,986 passengers from the adopted budget. The midyear service profile assumes nominal schedule improvements to current service. Changes include additional trips on route 23 and 24 to service Murrieta and Temecula Valley High School. Revenue service hours are projected at 615,787. This represents a 1.7 percent increase in actual fiscal year 2005 revenue service hours. It represents a 22,463 decrease from adopted revenue service hours. Postponed route changes include Route 1 Limited and service improvements on route 10, 13, 15, 49, 134

74, and 79, as well other enhancements on route 23 and 24 other than the additions stated above. The recalculation of revenue service miles based on 615,787 revenue service hours show a decrease of 333,330 from the adopted budget. Operating Budget Adjustments An operating budget profile is shown below. The profile shows the change in cost element from the fiscal year 2005 actual, 2006 adopted budget, and 2006 proposed midyear budget. The specific dollar amount of the change between the fiscal year 2006 adopted and midyear budgets are shown in the table below the graph. 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - FY2005 Actual Adopted Midyear Salaries Benefits Services Materials & Supplies Purchased Transportation Other Expenses FY2005 Actual Adopted Midyear Change Incr.+/(Decr.) Salaries $ 12,160,076 $ 13,159,530 $ 13,126,855 $ (32,675) Benefits 6,580,983 7,635,264 7,773,340 138,076 Subtotal 18,741,059 20,794,794 20,900,195 105,401 Services 1,749,258 2,103,649 2,147,199 43,550 Materials & Supplies 3,063,272 3,305,837 4,621,726 1,315,889 Purchased Transportation 11,776,101 12,714,237 12,535,506 (178,731) Other Expenses 2,857,964 3,154,572 2,963,137 (191,435) Subtotal 19,446,595 21,278,295 22,267,568 989,273 Total Operating Expenses $ 38,187,654 $ 42,073,089 $ 43,167,763 $ 1,094,674 The fiscal year 2006 adopted operating budget totals $42,073,089. This budget supported a planned implementation of Route 1 Limited, as well as other feeder route changes. Current operating expense forecasts of fuel and other resources to provide the level of service provided in fiscal year 2005 totals $43,167,763, an increase of $1,094,674. Budget that is earmarked for service enhancements must be used to offset projected increases in operating expenditures. Specific changes by cost element will be discussed below. 135

Salaries and Benefits Staff analyzed the current organization structure and staffing levels to determine optimal support to Agency operations. A contract operations department was reinstated to insure consistent monitoring of Agency contracted bus operations. Additional operations supervision will provide increased street operational oversight. Specific position changes are as follows: # of Positions * FY2005 Adopted Budget 372 Midyear Adjustments Additional Operations Supervisor 1 Additional Contracted Operations Field Administrator 1 Additional Contracted Operations Analyst 1 Subtotal 3 Midyear Proposed 375 Position Reclassifications & Title Changes (No Change in Headcount) Reclassification of Training Manager 1 Operations Manager to Contracted Services Operations Manager 1 QC Analyst to Stops & Zones Supervisor 1 Operations Specialist to Contracted Operations Specialist 1 Coach Operator (P/T to F/T) 5 Facilities Project Manager to Facilities Engineer 1 Admin. Svcs. Mgr. To Performance Analysis Director 1 * Excludes on-call Customer Information Clerks Seven (7) full-time Coach Operators were budgeted to support the Route 1 Limited implementation. Because of operator attrition trends and executive staff deployment strategies, these 7 positions were filled at the beginning of fiscal year 2006. Staff proposes that the current Coach Operator headcount of two hundred twenty-five (225) be maintained. Five (5) Part-Time Coach Operators budgeted in the adopted budget were reclassified to Full-Time Coach Operators as part of the deployment strategy. Implementation of the above position changes and a reforecast of operator pay hours for directly operated service resulted in an overall decrease of $32,675 in salaries. Benefits increased by $138,076. This is attributed to the Part-Time Coach Operator reclassification stated above, as well as benefits for the additional contracted operations positions. The total increase in salaries and benefits totals $105,401. Services Estimated expenditures in the cost element of Services increased by $43,550. This is the net result of a reclassification of a planned Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) from the capital 136

budget to the operating budget, greater than planned expenditures for an Oracle Hosting contract, and contracted services for service quality control, offset by savings associated with less than planed scheduling scenarios associated with Wage Order Number 9. Federal Section 5307 funding was received in fiscal year 2005 for the COA, and will be reprogrammed to the fiscal year 2006 operating budget. Materials and Supplies Estimated expenditures in materials and supplies have increased by $1,315,889. This is attributed to greater than planned price fluctuation in the cost elements of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Unleaded Fuel. Staff estimates that the rate per therm for CNG will increase from $0.80 in April 2005 to $1.42 by June 2006. The adopted budget for CNG fuel is $1,757,794, based on a rate per therm of $0.91. Based on this current price forecast, CNG fuel expenditures will be $3,056,423. This is $1,298,629 higher than previously planned in the adopted budget. Staff estimates that unleaded fuel will increase from a rate per gallon of $2.26 in April 2005 to $3.21 by June 2006. The adopted budget for unleaded fuel is $145,760, based on a rate per gallon of $2.50. Based on this current price forecast, unleaded fuel expenditures will be $163,020. This is $17,260 higher than previously planned in the adopted budget. Purchased Transportation Total estimated purchased transportation expenditures have changed from $12,714,237 in the adopted budget to $12,535,506, a decrease of $178,731. Cost avoidance (expenditure decreases) associated with not implementing full service changes on route 23, 24, 74, and 79 is offset by estimated increases in Agency Dial-A- Ride (DAR) service. The Agency is currently in the process of rebidding this service. The current schedule is for a new vendor to begin providing DAR service in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. The increases are attributed to probable increases in contractor rates. Again, net purchased transportation expenditures are estimated to lower than the adopted budget. Other Expenses Other expenses encompass the cost elements of Utilities, Insurance, Taxes, Advertising, Dues/Subscriptions, Training, and Miscellaneous other expenses. This element reflects a net decrease of $191,435 from the fiscal year 2006 adopted budget. 137

This is the result of increases in street operations staff training offset by expenditure savings associated with implementation of Wage Order Number 9. Operating Revenues An operating revenue profile is shown below. The profile shows the change in revenue sources from the fiscal year 2006 adopted budget to the midyear budget. The specific dollar amount of the changes is shown in the table below the graph. 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 - Adopted Midyear LTF Fed. Sect. 5307 Fed. Sect. 5311 Farebox LTF Federal Section 5307 Federal Section 5311 Farebox Total Adopted Budget $ 27,018,462 $ 6,989,385 $ 189,419 $ 7,875,823 $ 42,073,089 Change (Incr./(Decr.) 1,584,931 165,115 - (655,372) 1,094,674 Midyear Budget $ 28,603,393 $ 7,154,500 $ 189,419 $ 7,220,451 $ 43,167,763 An additional $1,094,674 is needed to fully fund the midyear budget. Current farebox revenue projections that are based on the midyear revenue service hour profile reflect $7,220,451. This is $655,372 down from the farebox revenue projections developed during the fiscal year 2006 budget process. Federal Section 5307 grant funding that was awarded to the Agency in fiscal year 2005 will be used to fund the COA. To offset the decrease in farebox revenues and increased expenditures forecasted in the midyear budget, additional LTF funds of $1,584,931 is needed. In January 2005, the RCTC Board of Commissioners adopted a reserve policy that allocated $3,066,713 of LTF to be held for Agency use in the case of unforeseen revenue shortfalls or increases in operating costs. If approved by the board, staff will request that $1,584,931 be drawn down from these reserves. 138

PIP Impact The schedule below illustrates the impact of the midyear budget on the PIP: FY2005 Actual Adopted Midyear Low End Target High End Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $ 63.08 $ 65.92 $ 70.10 N/A $ 65.60 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.01% 17.73% 17.82% N/A 17.73% Subsidy Per Passenger $ 4.29 $ 4.32 $ 4.87 $ 3.62 $ 4.90 Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $ 0.64 $ 0.73 $ 0.73 $ 0.61 $ 0.83 Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $ 52.13 $ 53.58 $ 58.38 $ 44.60 $ 60.34 Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $ 3.22 $ 3.34 $ 3.62 $ 2.69 $ 3.65 Passengers Per Revenue Hour 12.15 12.41 11.99 10.46 14.16 Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.75 0.77 0.74 0.63 0.85 The Agency meets all fiscal year 2006 PIP performance indicator targets except Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour. The cost increased from $65.92 to $70.10, an increase of $4.18. The midyear forecast of a 540,986 reduction in passengers and a $655,372 decrease in the farebox revenue projection, coupled with a $1,094,674 increase in expenditures result in a $0.55 increase in Subsidy Per Passenger, a $4.80 increase in Subsidy Per Revenue Hour, and a $0.28 increase in Subsidy Per Revenue Mile. Passengers Per Revenue Hour and Passengers Per Revenue Mile both decreased by 3 percent. Farebox Recovery Ratio A predetermined farebox ratio target was developed by Agency staff and approved by both the RCTC and CalTrans. The target is 17.73 percent. Once the target is established, it cannot be revised. The fiscal year 2006 midyear farebox ratio projection is shown below: Midyear Revenues Projected Farebox Revenues $ 7,220,451 Other Local Revenues 337,369 Exempt Routes (380,011) Subtotal Revenues $ 7,177,809 Expenses Operating Expenses 43,167,763 Exempt Routes (2,885,037) Subtotal Expenses 40,282,726 Farebox Ratio 17.82% 139

Fiscal Impact: Given current revenue and expense forecasts, the Agency will realize a 17.82 percent farebox recovery ratio. This exceeds the 17.73 percent farebox ratio target. The fiscal year 2006 adopted budget totals $42,073,089. Staff currently projects year-end expenditures to be $43,167,763. This reflects an increase of $1,094,674. Current year-end farebox revenues are projected to be $655,372 less than initial projections. Federal grant funds of $165,115 that were awarded to the Agency during fiscal year 2004 will be used for a COA. Additional funding of $1,584,931 will be needed to support the continuation of current service schedules. If the Agency board approves this midyear budget request, staff will work with RCTC staff to prepare the necessary SRTP amendment documents to obtain approval from the RCTC Board of Commissioners. Committee Recommendation: Recommendation: This item was discussed at the Board Budget and Finance Committee meeting of November 9 th. The Committee members unanimously approved recommending this item to the full Board of Directors for their consideration. Adopt the proposed fiscal year 2006 midyear budget update Request additional LTF funding of $1,584,931 from LTF reserves of $3,066,713 on hand at the RCTC Direct staff to prepare the necessary documentation for an SRTP amendment to reflect these actions 140