Deactivating Active Share

Similar documents
Correlation and Asset Management

Advisor Briefing Why Alternatives?

Thinking. Alternative. Alternative Thinking Q4 2016: Superstar Investors. U.K. Supplement. Supplement released November 2017

Portfolio Construction Matters

Deactivating Active Share

Thinking. Alternative. Third Quarter The Role of Alternative Beta Premia

Active share is a metric proposed by Cremers

Tactical Tilts and Forgone Diversification

The Great Divide. Cliff Asness, Ph.D. Managing and Founding Principal. October For Investment Professional Use Only. AQR Capital Management, LLC

Hedge Funds, Hedge Fund Beta, and the Future for Both. Clifford Asness. Managing and Founding Principal AQR Capital Management, LLC

Can Active Management Make a Comeback? September 2015

How Active Is Your Fund Manager? Active Share and Mutual Fund Performance

Allocation Advisors Active/Passive Portfolios

Thinking. Alternative. Second Quarter Long-Term Expected Returns

Betting Against Correlation:

Adverse Active Alpha SM Manager Ranking Model

Lazard Insights. Interpreting Active Share. Summary. Erianna Khusainova, CFA, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Analyst

res Key Ideas great or Over the

Mutual Funds through the Lens of Active Share

2018 AQR Funds Supplemental Tax Information

The Timely Case for Quality and Value Stocks

New Research: Why Active Portfolios Don t Work

Alternative Thinking 4Q17. The Illusion of Active Fixed Income Diversification

Understanding the Volatility Risk Premium

THE POWER OF INDEXES: COMPARING DIVERSIFIED PORTFOLIOS OF INDEX FUNDS WITH PORTFOLIOS OF ACTIVELY MANAGED FUNDS

Portfolio Construction

Video: GIC Wealth Management Perspectives

AI: Weighted Sector Strategy DEC

Bring More to Your Clients. Active and passive investing: Uncover the power of AND

THE CASE FOR INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES

What Institutional Investors are Looking for from Hedge Funds. CTA-EXPO Chicago September 2015

Adverse Active Alpha SM : Adding Value Through Manager Selection

Volatility-Managed Strategies

Active management can add big value in small-cap equities

HSBC Vantage5 Index Methodology Guide

Highly Selective Active Managers, Though Rare, Outperform

The Select Investment Scorecard. Don t Settle for Average.

S&P INDICES VERSUS ACTIVE FUNDS (SPIVA ) SCORECARD

Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX)

Building a Better Equity Market Neutral Strategy

QUARTERLY COMMENTARY HEARTLAND VALUE FUND

Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation. Martijn Cremers (Yale) Antti Petajisto (Yale) Eric Zitzewitz (Dartmouth)

Index Information on Morgan Stanley SmartInvest Indices

Better Equity Portfolios through Active Share. September 2013

DURSO WEALTH MANAGEMENT GROUP AT MORGAN STANLEY May 31, 2016 ECONOMIC LANDSCAPE

Factor investing: building balanced factor portfolios

Seek to Improve US Equity Exposure

An All-Cap Core Investment Approach

Active Share and the Three Pillars of Active Management: Skill, Conviction and Opportunity. Martijn Cremers* University of Notre Dame

Schwab Institutional Large Cap Growth Trust Fund

Active Share. Active Share is best used as a supplementary measure in conjunction with tracking error.

When do enhanced indexation managers add alpha? In previous papers, 1 we identified market circumstances that seem to have a positive

Smart Beta: Index Investing, Evolved

Sector Investing: Essential Building Blocks for Portfolio Construction

Invesco Comstock Fund. Finding opportunity

U.S. Equities LONG-TERM BENEFITS OF THE T. ROWE PRICE APPROACH TO ACTIVE MANAGEMENT

Lazard Insights. Distilling the Risks of Smart Beta. Summary. What Is Smart Beta? Paul Moghtader, CFA, Managing Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst

Alternative. Thinking. Second Quarter Exploring Rates Sensitivity

A Snapshot of Active Share

The Realities of Diversification

Schwab Institutional Small Cap Trust Fund (Closed to new investors)

Smart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing

Investors Diversified Realty, LLC ( IDR ) February 2015

THE ACTIVE SHARE DEBATE WEBINAR. Presented by John Alexander, CFA Billy Welsh

April The Value of Active Management.

Going Beyond Style Box Investing

Taking a Closer Look at Active Share

J.P. Morgan Structured Investments

Quantitative Easing and the Dollar-Yen Carry Trade

GOAL ENGINEER SERIES PORTFOLIO HIGHLIGHTS:

MOMENTUM INVESTING: SIMPLE, BUT NOT EASY

An Economic Perspective on Dividends

Big Currency Depreciations: What Happens Next?

Private Investments - A Potential Alternative to Frothy Public Markets. January 22, 2018

Addition Through Subtraction: Thinking Strategically About Managing Tax Liabilities

Smart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing

TACTICAL INVESTMENT STRATEGIES TRADE DECISIONS AND RATIONALE December 5, 2017

Schwab Institutional Large Cap Value Trust Fund (Closed to new investors)

Smart Beta Dashboard. Thoughts at a Glance. January By the SPDR Americas Research Team

Hans Janssen Daalen General Director DUFAS. Stockholm, May 16, 2011

J.P. Morgan Structured Investments

Please read important disclosures at the end of this paper.

WHY VALUE INVESTING IS SIMPLE, BUT NOT EASY

Lazard Insights. Growth: An Underappreciated Factor. What Is an Investment Factor? Summary. Does the Growth Factor Matter?

Market Analysis / Second Quarter 2016 I NDEPENDENT W EALTH M ANAGEMENT

Global Investment Committee Themes

Smart Beta Dashboard. Thoughts at a Glance. March By the SPDR Americas Research Team

Translating Factors to International Markets

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund

Equity Portfolio Management Strategies

Pioneer Funds Top European Players

Nationwide Fiduciary Series SM Important Disclosures

INVESTMENT PLAN. Sample Client. For. May 04, Prepared by : Sample Advisor Financial Consultant.

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes. 1 Benjamin Franklin

Performance Supplement. The IBM 401(k) Plus Plan Investment Results

Active vs. Passive Money Management

The Evolution of Alternative Beta: Using Index-Based Investment Strategies

HSBC Vantage5 Index Guide

What Matters Most. The Case for Active. Risk Management

Certificates of Deposit Linked to the J.P. Morgan Alternative Index Multi-Strategy 5 (USD)

Transcription:

Deactivating Active Share Andrea Frazzini Jacques Friedman Lukasz Pomorski April 21, 2016 AQR Capital Management, LLC Two Greenwich Plaza Greenwich, CT 06830 p: +1.203.742.3600 w: aqr.com

Active Share and Performance Why Did We Write This Paper? Key claims of Active Share proponents Funds with high Active Share outperform their benchmarks Funds with high Active Share outperform funds with low Active Share Funds with Active Share below 60% are closet indexers and should be avoided More-active mutual fund and institutional money managers tout their Active Share Several leading investment consultants strongly emphasize the measure Online tools are now available to allow investors to screen managers based on Active Share. Institutional investors have embedded a high Active Share requirement in their investment guidelines Example from a public pension plan s search for a small cap manager: The firm and/or portfolio manager must: ( ) have a high Active Share in the Small-Cap Strategy, preferably greater than 75% in the last three years ; furthermore, if the Active Share is lower than 75%, please clearly state that in the RFP response and explain why the Active Share is low and why it is beneficial. 1

What We Do We use the same data as Cremers and Petajisto (2009) and Petajisto (2013) http://petajisto.net/data.html: U.S. Actively Managed Mutual funds. 1990 2009. First, replicate the original results using the same empirical setup The same Active Share groupings and performance evaluation tools. Using the same sample, we show that: Active Share performance results arise entirely from a mechanical correlation between Active Share and benchmark type. There is no reliable empirical evidence that investors have been better off by selecting high active share managers. High active share funds and low active share fund have similar (i.e., statistically indistinguishable) returns while their benchmarks are very different. Predictability disappears once you control for benchmarks 2

A Closer Today s Look at Active Agenda Share A Sort on Active Share Is a Sort on the Benchmark For each benchmark, we present the average (dots), 25th and 75th percentile (whiskers) of the Active Share of funds following that benchmark. Benchmarks are sorted on the average Active Share. Source: Petajisto (2013), AQR using data from http://petajisto.net/data.html ; Data is from 1990-2009. Active Share of U.S. equity mutual funds, computed separately each quarter when fund holdings are disclosed. The benchmark index is the official benchmark index disclosed in the prospectus. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. Please read important disclosures in the Appendix.

A Closer Look at Active Share Comparing Funds Across Widely Different Universes Is Problematic How can benchmarks have alpha? Cremers, Petajisto, Zitzewitz, 2013, Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation Over 1990-2009, small cap benchmarks had much lower four-factor alphas than large cap benchmarks Small cap benchmarks were easier to beat for investors using size, value, and momentum 4

A Closer Today s Look at Active Agenda Share What Kind of Funds Are High Active Share? U.S. Mutual Funds Sort entire universe by Active Share High Active Share Low Active Share High Low Following decision rule ignores underlying benchmark or style/cap characteristics across the universe of funds Picking high active share funds across the entire U.S. equity universe would mean holding small-cap funds For Investment Professional Use Only 5

A Closer Look at Active Share Active Share s Efficacy Controlling for Benchmarks Controlling for benchmarks U.S. Mutual Funds Large Cap Small Cap Large Cap Small Cap High Active Share minus Low Active Share A more realistic approach to institutional decision making is to compare funds within a benchmark group as a proxy for similar style/cap ranges Here, first sort by benchmark then compare Active Share within each group Now that we control for the apples-to-oranges problem, how does Active Share do? For Investment Professional Use Only 6

A Closer Look at Active Share Controlling for Benchmark, Performance Predictability Disappears Apples-to-apples comparison High versus low Active Share funds within a given benchmark After identifying these funds, form the five portfolios using the whole mutual funds universe Little evidence that Closet indexers are any different from Stock pickers The two groups are statistically indistinguishable one from the other Sorting on Active Share across all benchmarks, as in C&P Sorting on Active Share separately within each benchmark Dependent variable Bmk-adj returns Bmk-adj alphas Bmk-adj returns Bmk-adj alphas Closet indexers (P1) -0.93*** -1.05*** -0.71** -0.88*** (-3.48) (-4.66) (-2.53) (-3.76) Moderately active (P2) -0.53-0.76* -0.41-0.58 (-1.19) (-1.89) (-0.95) (-1.46) Factor bets (P3) -1.27-2.12*** -1.15-1.47*** (-1.32) (-3.13) (-1.48) (-2.64) Concentrated (P4) -0.49-1.04-0.71-1.46 (-0.32) (-0.88) (-0.40) (-1.25) Stock pickers (P5) 1.21* 1.37** 0.45-0.004 (1.81) (2.04) (0.53) (-0.01) P5 minus P1 2.14*** 2.42*** 1.16 0.88 (3.33) (3.81) (1.48) (1.48) Source: Petajisto (2013), AQR using data from http://petajisto.net/data.html ; CRSP Mutual Fund Database. Data is from 1990-2009. Active Share of U.S. equity mutual funds, computed separately each quarter when fund holdings are disclosed. The benchmark index is the official benchmark index disclosed in the prospectus. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. Please read important disclosures in the Appendix. 7

A Closer Look at Active Share Controlling for Benchmark, Performance Predictability Disappears High Active Share predicts higher returns in 8 of 17 benchmarks High Active Share predicts lower returns in 9 of 17 benchmarks For example, in the most popular mutual fund benchmarks: In S&P 500 (356 funds/month), Active Share predicts higher performance (but is insignificant) In Russell 1000 Growth (123 funds/month), Active Share predicts lower performance In Russell 2000 (106 funds/month) Active Share predicts higher performance In Russell MidCap Growth (96 funds/month) Active Share predicts lower performance Etc 8

A Closer Look at Active Share Within Individual Benchmarks, Active Share Is Just Noise Active Share predicts performance as well as a coin flip positive in 8 / negative in 9 Statistically significant in two benchmarks: one positive, one negative result Within similar groups get diverging results (works in S&P 500 but not S&P Value or Growth or Russell 1000; positive in Russell 2000 but not S&P 600 ) Source: Petajisto (2013), AQR using data from http://petajisto.net/data.html; Data is from 1990-2009. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. Broad-based securities indices are unmanaged and are not subject to fees and expenses typically associated with managed accounts or investment funds. Investments cannot be made directly in an index. Please read important disclosures in the Appendix. 9

Conclusions Active Share as with other measures of activity does not reliably predict fund performance The original studies supporting Active Share relied on sorting portfolios in a way that is inconsistent with institutional practice Results tell you more about small-cap managers vs. large-cap managers than about whether being more active is beneficial Still, one use of measures of activity, such as the Active Share, is evaluating fair fees Fees should be in line with active risk funds take Active Share is just one possible measure of active risk Possible measures include ex ante Tracking Error, ex post Tracking Error, the largest position in a stock and in an industry, number of holdings 10

Appendix

Performance Disclosures This document has been provided to you solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. This document is intended exclusively for the use of the person to whom it has been delivered and it is not to be reproduced or redistributed to any other person. This document is subject to further review and revision. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT A GUARANTEE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE. This presentation is not research and should not be treated as research. This presentation does not represent valuation judgments with respect to any financial instrument, issuer, security or sector that may be described or referenced herein and does not represent a formal or official view of AQR. The views expressed reflect the current views as of the date hereof and neither the speaker nor AQR undertakes to advise you of any changes in the views expressed herein. It should not be assumed that the speaker or AQR will make investment recommendations in the future that are consistent with the views expressed herein, or use any or all of the techniques or methods of analysis described herein in managing client accounts. AQR and its affiliates may have positions (long or short) or engage in securities transactions that are not consistent with the information and views expressed in this presentation. The information contained herein is only as current as of the date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Charts and graphs provided herein are for illustrative purposes only. The information in this presentation has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, neither AQR nor the speaker guarantees the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information. Nothing contained herein constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. There can be no assurance that an investment strategy will be successful. Historic market trends are not reliable indicators of actual future market behavior or future performance of any particular investment which may differ materially, and should not be relied upon as such. Target allocations contained herein are subject to change. There is no assurance that the target allocations will be achieved, and actual allocations may be significantly different than that shown here. This presentation should not be viewed as a current or past recommendation or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The information in this presentation may contain projections or other forward looking statements regarding future events, targets, forecasts or expectations regarding the strategies described herein, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such events or targets will be achieved, and may be significantly different from that shown here. The information in this presentation, including statements concerning financial market trends, is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Performance of all cited indices is calculated on a total return basis with dividends reinvested. The investment strategy and themes discussed herein may be unsuitable for investors depending on their specific investment objectives and financial situation. Please note that changes in the rate of exchange of a currency may affect the value, price or income of an investment adversely. Neither AQR nor the speaker assumes any duty to, nor undertakes to update forward looking statements. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made or given by or on behalf of AQR, the speaker or any other person as to the accuracy and completeness or fairness of the information contained in this presentation, and no responsibility or liability is accepted for any such information. By accepting this presentation in its entirety, the recipient acknowledges its understanding and acceptance of the foregoing statement. Broad-based securities indices are unmanaged and are not subject to fees and expenses typically associated with managed accounts or investment funds. Investments cannot be made directly in an index. There is a risk of substantial loss associated with trading commodities, futures, options, derivatives and other financial instruments. Before trading, investors should carefully consider their financial position and risk tolerance to determine if the proposed trading style is appropriate. Investors should realize that when trading futures, commodities, options, derivatives and other financial instruments one could lose the full balance of their account. It is also possible to lose more than the initial deposit when trading derivatives or using leverage. All funds committed to such a trading strategy should be purely risk capital. For Investment Professional Use Only 12