You Down with QPP? Daniel Collins Director of Finance Orlando Health Physician Enterprise

Similar documents
MACRA Final Rule Summary

PRIMER: MACRA and the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Tara O Neill Hayes January 31, 2016

CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019

Scripps Health ACO Update

MACRA: THE FINAL RULE. Last updated 12/13/16

Key Financial and Operational Impacts from the Proposed Rule to Implement MACRA:

Medicare Quality Payment Program Overview (MACRA)

CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary

MACRA: Redefining How CMS Pays Doctors. White Paper ELLIS MAC KNIGHT, MD DAN KIEHL, JD CONTACT. Senior Vice President/CMO. Associate Consultant

MACRA: New Medicare Reimbursement Models Sharp HealthCare

Thank you, and enjoy the webinar.

4/8/17. The Changing Nature of Physician Payment and Health Care Reform in The AMA A Unifying Voice for Physicians

Predictive Qualifying Alternative Payment Model (APM) Participants (QPs) Methodology Fact Sheet What is the Predictive QP Status Analysis?

AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short)

MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) REVIEW

Medicare Releases Final Rule for the Second Year of the Quality Payment Program

Get Straight on MACRA in 2018

The Future Of Medicare Physician Reimbursement

MACRA: Alternative Payment Models Proposed Rule CY 2016

MACRA, MIPS, APMs & CPC+: What to Expect from All These Acronyms?! Monthly National Briefing April 26, 2016

Topics to be covered. Do I have to participate in MACRA/MIPS/QPP? Choices for participation. Timelines. What is changing with QPP

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (HR. 2; MACRA)

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GASTROENTEROLOGY MAKING $ENSE OF MACRA

Copyright Scottsdale Institute All Rights Reserved.

9/7/17. MACRA: The Knowns and the Unknowns. Disclosures. Goals and Objectives

The MACRA Proposed Rule on MIPS and APMs: Summary and Key Takeaways

2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule. Summary

Proposed 2018 Medicare Physician Payment and Quality Reporting Changes. Executive s Insights

MACRA: APPLICATIONS & IMPLICATIONS September 13, /13/2016. Mark Blessing, CPA, FHFMA Partner

2018 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Scoring Overview

Other Payer Advanced APM Determination

A PRIMER FOR PRIMARY CARE

Health Care Policy Landscape: Market Trends & Frontline Perspectives

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW NOVEMBER 15, 2018

Moving to Accountable Care through the ACA & MACRA

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW

MACRA and the Evolving Health Care Landscape. Jarrod Fowler, M.H.A. FMA Director of Health Care Policy and Innovation

Quality Payment Program Year 2

MACRA Medicare Payment Reform and the Implications to Medicare Advantage Plans

NAACOS Analysis Shows ACOs In Top MIPS Performance Tier

Summary of the Quality Payment Program (QPP) Year 2 Final Rule

Washington Update. Suzanne Falk, MPP Associate Director, Government Affairs

All About APMs: What Will It Take for Physicians to Earn the APM Bonus Under MACRA?

MACRA Overview. April 2016

2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

Federal Update Issues Impacting Rheumatologists and their Patients. Emily L. Graham, RHIA, CCS-P VP, Regulatory Affairs Hart Health Strategies, Inc.

Washington Update. Suzanne Falk, MPP Associate Director, Government Affairs

MACRA Update: The Top 8 For Amy Mullins, MD, CPE, FAAFP Medical Director, Quality Improvement AAFP

2018 Quality Measure Benchmarks Overview

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GASTROENTEROLOGY MAKING $ENSE OF MACRA

A Practical Discussion of Value and Quality Based Payments What Do I Do Now?

RUPRI Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis. Rural Policy Brief. Brief No NOVEMBER

New Medicare Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: Navigating Changes Under MACRA

Quality Payment Program Year 3

MACRA: How the 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Impacts Providers

Next Generation Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Model Overview

Volume to Value The Great Transformation of American Medicine

FAQs: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES & 42 CFR 414 [CMS-5522-FC

9/23/2016. Our Services. Transitioning from Fee-for-Service to Value-based Reimbursement. Key Trends and Strategies for Rural Health Providers

CMS Proposals for Quality Reporting Programs Under the 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule

First a word about the rising cost of retiree healthcare

CMS Quality Payment Program

The Road to Value. Aric R. Sharp, MHA, CMPE, FACHE Vice President Accountable Care UnityPoint Health February 3, 2017

On Track for MACRA The Provider s Guide to QPP

Washington Update. Mollie Gelburd, JD - 1 -

Growth and Success of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) in the US from Dennis Horrigan June 2016

August 21, Ms. Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland

I. Recommendations Related to the Definition of More Than Nominal Risk in Alternative Payment Models

2018 Washington Update

December 19, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:

Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, CMPE, PhD, Principal, MGMA Consulting April 10, , Telligen, Inc.

HEALTH CARE INSIDER VOLUME 7 :: ISSUE 2 THE NEW REVENUE RECOGNITION STANDARD AS IT APPLIES TO HEALTH CARE ENTITIES

Fact Sheet: 2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Payment Adjustments based on 2017 MIPS Final Scores

Current State of Medicare. Robert Roth & John Hellow Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC

Current State of Medicare

WHERE THE FRONT LINE MEETS THE BOTTOM LINE: THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE

2018 Final Rule from CMS for the Quality Payment Program

Eight Indispensable Financial Considerations of Shifting from Volume to Value Reimbursement

HEALTH ECONOMICS AND REIMBURSEMENT

The ACO Track One+ Model: New Rewards for Risk

Alternative Payment Models in the Quality Payment Program as of November 2018

5 critical issues for BPCI-A

PREPARING FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF MANAGED CARE CONTRACTING

Trump Care: Overview of Healthcare Reform Plans

Understanding and Facilitating Rural Health Transformation

2017 Proposed Rule MIPS Composite Performance Score Resource Use Performance Category

Building Capacity for Value. Missouri Rural Health Conference August 15, 2017

Health Policy Update 2017 Kevin Grumbach, MD

September 6, Re: CMS-1600-P; CY 2014 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed rule comments

AAMC Teleconference: ACO Final Regulation. November 16, 2011

What You Need to Know About CMS Quality and Resource Use Report

2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

Everything You Need to Know About the MIPS Payment Adjustment

Physician Compensation In Today s Changing Market

Health IT Public Policy Update

AMGA MIPS Collaborative. June 21, 2017

CNYCC Joint Board and Finance Committee Forum

Clinically Integrated Networks and Population Health The next chapter in healthcare

2014 Physician Quality Reporting System: Group Reporting Requirements

Transcription:

You Down with QPP? Daniel Collins Director of Finance Orlando Health Physician Enterprise

Why Was the QPP created? Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7df7chghas4

What is QPP? Quality Payment Program Created from bi-partisan legislation named MACRA (Medicare Access CHIP and Reauthorization Act) in 2015. Approved 92 to 8 in the Senate. Approved 392 to 37 in the House. 3-in-1 Approach PQRS, VM, MU QPP

Who Does It Apply To? MD s ARNP s & PA s DO s Clinical Nurse Spec Medicare Part B Reimbursement 2017 Low-Volume Threshold: - $30,000 Billed or - 100 Patients Seen

Timeline Source: https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/quality_payment_program_overview_fact_sheet.pdf; Page 4

2 Step Music Ciara & Missy Elliott 1, 2 Step Unk 2 Step Remixed by T Pain Dave Matthews Band Two Step Brad Paisley Wrapped Around History The Original Two-Step John Phillip Souza - "Washington Post March" in 1891. Now used in both country-western and hip-hop dancing

2 Different Tracks Merit Based Incentive Payment System 4 Weighted Categories: 1) Quality 2) Advancing Care Information 3) Continuing Practice Improvement Activities (NEW) 4) Cost Limited Risk Advanced Alternative Payment Model 3 Criteria: 1) Use certified EHR Technology 2) Base payments on quality measures comparable to the MIPS Quality category. 3) Bear financial risk for monetary losses Examples: MSSP Tracks 2 & 3 Next Generation ACO CPC Plus

Participation Estimates Participation Type 48.1% 14.4% 32.5% Not Eligible Type of Clinician Low-Volume Clinician Advanced APM 5% MIPS Source: MACRA: Final Rule; Vizient Southeast; Page 18

MIPS Quality Select Six (6) Individual Measures (> 270 measures) One (1) Measure = Outcome Measure Reduced from a required nine (9) measures for PQRS Mandatory All-Cause Readmission Population Based Measure CMS will choose six best scoring measures if report more than the required number of measures. All-Payer Data Required (change from only Medicare) Data Completeness 50% of denominator for measure Extra Credit Receive bonus for each measure reported using CEHRT (up to 10%) Receive bonus for each Additional High Priority Measure (up to 5%)

MIPS ACI Applies to all clinicians, instead of only physicians (under MU) No longer all-or-nothing measure threshold reporting; clinicians are scored on participation and performance 5 Required Performance Measures: Security Risk Analysis E-Prescribing Provide Patient Access Send Summary of Care Request/Accept Summary of Care Additional credit for submitting up to 9 measures

MIPS CPIA Brand NEW value category introduced by MIPS Minimum selection of one (1) CPIA activity required, with additional scoring for more activities 93 eligible activities Automatic full credit for PCMH; ½ credit for APM participation with opportunities for full credit Most activities have medium weight 10 points Some activities have high weight 20 points Max credit obtained by achieving 40 points

MIPS Cost CMS calculates based on claims submitted NO reporting requirements for providers. Feedback provided for 2017 Performance Period on 10 episodebased measures. Episode measures will change in future years and may be utilized in scoring. Weighting was originally intended to gradually increase for cost and decrease for quality. UPDATE: For 2018, CMS has increased the weight from 0% to 10%. 2 Measures in 2018 Performance Period Total per Capita Costs for all attributed beneficiaries Medicare Spending per Beneficiary.

Quality 6 individual quality measures; Score = 48 All-Cause Readmission measure = 8.5 All measures submitted using CEHRT = 5 Final Score = 61.5/70 X 60% = 52.7 ACI All 5 measures submitted; Base Score = 50 Scoring of 5 Measures = 33 Final Score = 83/100 X 25% = 20.75 Cost No Required Reporting 2 Measures Weighted for 2018 Final Score = 0/0 X 0% = 0 CPIA 1 High-Weight Activity Reported = 20 1 Medium-Weight Activity Reported = 10 Final Score = 30/40 X 15% = 11.25 Total Composite Performance Score (CPS) CPS over 70 are eligible for the exceptional performance adjustment ($500M pool) CPS = 84.7

MIPS Weighting Changes Source: https://www.surveyvitals.com/start/quality-payment-program-preparing-for-mips

Small Practices will Lose Source: https://www.advisory.com/-/media/advisory-com/research/mgsc/resources/posters/macra/34707-5-things-everyone-should-know-about- MACRA.pdf

MIPS in Hip Hop Trivia Macklemore ICE-T Pitbull Snoop Dogg

Advanced APMs New approaches to paying for medical care through Medicare that incentivizes quality & value. QPP does NOT change how current APM s function. It only creates extra incentives! Incentives for Participation: 1) Do not have to participate in MIPS 2) 5% lump sum payment adjustment bonus in payment years 2019-2024 3) Higher fee schedule updates starting in 2026. MUCH HIGHER DOWNSIDE RISK to Clinicians Requires significant infrastructure

Advanced APMs Criteria 1) Certified EHR Technology At least 50% of eligible clinicians must use CEHRT Increases to 75% after Year 1 (2017) A penalty or reward may be assigned based on the degree of CEHRT usage among clinicians. 2) Base Payment on MIPS Comparable Quality Measures No minimum number of measures Must have at least one (1) outcome measure 3) Clinicians Bear Risk for Monetary Losses Certain magnitude required > 8% of the average estimated Parts A and B revenue of the participating APM entity

Qualified Participants (QPs) Payment Amount Method 25% of Medicare Part B payments received through the Advanced APM Patient Count Method 20% of patients receiving Medicare Part B professional services received through the Advanced APM *Only QP s are eligible for Incentives from participation in an Advanced APM

Late-Comers August 31, 2017 Last snapshot date to qualify in an Advanced APM as a QP. If a provider joins an Advanced APM after this date, they will have to report separately via the MIPS route. Issue will only occur in CY17 reporting, an additional 12/31 snapshot is added in future years.

Advanced APM Examples Shared Savings Programs (Tracks 2 & 3) ACO Track 1+ Model Next Generation ACO Comprehensive ESRD Care Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Oncology Care Model (two sided risk track, available 2018) * NOT MSSP Track 1 (no downside risk)

Source: https://www.advisory.com/research/health-care-it-advisor/events/webconferences/2016/2017-macra-final-rule-detailed-analysis/ondemand; Slide 30

Finish The Lyric Shawty had them Apple Bottom Jeans, Boots with the. "To the To the Everything you own in the box to the. Fur In The Ayer Nelly Left Irreplaceable - Beyonce

Finish The Lyric And still I see no. Can t a brother get a little peace? It s war on the streets and a war in the Middle East. Changes Changes 2Pac

2017 to 2018 Final Rule Changes 2017 Low Volume Threshold $30K or 100 Part B patients Virtual Groups Not a submission option Quality Data Completeness 50% (if not met, 3 points) 2018 Low Volume Threshold $90K or 200 Part B patients Virtual Groups Can be made up of solo practitioners and groups of 10 or fewer eligible clinicians Quality Data Completeness 60% (if not met, 1 point)

2017 to 2018 Final Rule Changes 2017 Category Weights Quality = 60% ACI = 25% CPIA = 15% Cost = 0% Improvement Scoring for Quality & Cost None 2018 Category Weights Quality = 50% ACI = 25% CPIA = 15% Cost = 10% Improvement Scoring for Quality & Cost Quality = up to 10 points Cost = up to 1 point

2017 to 2018 Final Rule Changes 2017 Performance Threshold 3 points Example: 1 Quality Measure submission (does not need to meet data completeness) Performance Period 90 days to be eligible for positive payment adjustment 2018 Performance Threshold 15 points Example: 5 Quality Measure submissions that meet data completeness requirement Performance Period Full year to be eligible for positive payment adjustment

MIPS Elimination? MedPAC is looking to eliminate the MIPS track of the QPP and replace with a voluntary value program Focus on population-based measures from claims data or surveys. Eliminate reporting burden of MIPS Withhold 2% of Medicare payment for all providers Join voluntary value program or Advanced APM or forfeit amount

MIPS Elimination? March 2018 October 2017 MedPAC publicizes draft recommendations to repeal MIPS December 2017 MedPAC finalized its proposed recommendation to repeal MIPS January 2018 MedPAC voted 14-2 to get rid of MIPS and replace with the Voluntary Value Program (VPP). MedPAC will present its proposal to Congress.

Orlando Health Medical Group Case Study

OHMG Initial Strategy 1) Form a QPP Core Group with Key Stakeholders/Decision Makers Meet monthly 2) Gather Past Quality and Resource Use Reports (QRURs) 3) Choose a Third Party Vendor to perform data submission to CMS 4) Educate physicians, practice management, and executive admin

OHMG Structure OHMG Specialist TINs Primary Care TINs Large Specialist TIN Oncology Specialist TIN Small Specialist TIN Small PCP TIN Large PCP TIN Small PCP TIN 400 Physicians 50 Physicians 10 Physicians 10 Physicians 100 Physicians 10 Physicians

OHMG Specialists TINs 1) Large Specialist TIN Lower Quality Scores on QRUR 2) Oncology Specialist TIN Higher Quality Scores on QRUR 3) Small Specialist TIN Smaller physician entity of only 10 providers

OHMG Specialists TINs Large Specialist TIN Oncology Specialist TIN 2015 Annual Quality and Resource Use Reports

OHMG Specialists Strategy Combine the Oncology Specialist TIN into the Large Specialist TIN Report Oncology quality metrics that received perfect scores under PQRS The TIN combination is effective 10/1/17. 6 month lead time to communicate to Managed Care payers & CMS, Accounting, Legal, Regulatory, Providers, Billing Office, Foundation, and HR. Allows for 90 consecutive day reporting

OHMG Primary Care TINs 1) Participates in an MSSP ACO MSSP Track 1 ACO (non-advanced ACO) 2) Gained Patient Centered Medical Home status Full credit for Continuing Practice Improvement Activities category 3) Top performing MSSP ACO s in the country in 2014-2017.

OHMG Primary Care Strategy 2019 No longer will be able to participate in MSSP Track 1. Considering MSSP Track 3 or Next Generation ACO Combine specialist TINs into MSSP Track 3 or Next Generation ACO. May increase PMPM cost based on patient attribution to providers PCP attribution trumps Specialist Reduces reporting burden

OHMG Primary Care Strategy Receive 0.75% Fee Schedule increases in 2026 and beyond Take advantage of +5% Advanced APM bonus for all Provider TINs.

Resources CMS Quality Payment Program Education Website https://qpp.cms.gov Join the Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative 140,000 clinician practices over the next four years Designed to support sharing, adapting, and further developing quality improvement strategies along with adherence to the Quality Payment Program Quality Payment Program Service Center 1-866-288-8292 M-F from 8 AM - 8 PM Dan Collins, Director of Finance - OHMG Daniel.Collins@orlandohealth.com (321) 841-2216

YOU DOWN WITH QPP?

Questions?